Blog

In 2024, according to international studies, over 60% of corporate losses in cross-border transactions are related to insufficient counterparty verification and neglecting due diligence. Every third case of account blocking in EU and Asian banks is a result of compliance procedure errors and a formal approach to legal business verification.

But are you ready to jeopardize your company’s reputation, assets, and strategic prospects due to one underestimated deal?

In a context where regulators in the EU, UK, Singapore, and UAE are tightening requirements for KYC and AML, and banks and payment systems are implementing automated verification systems, self-checking of counterparties becomes not just an element of internal control but a key tool for survival and growth in international markets.

Lack of comprehensive verification is not only a risk of fines, blocks, and legal proceedings but also a real threat to strategic initiatives: from entering new markets to attracting investments.

Consider: how transparent is your next partner? Are you sufficiently protected from sanction risks, fraud, corporate conflicts, and reputational losses? Are you ready to integrate best practices of due diligence into business processes, not just to meet regulatory requirements but to outpace competitors in terms of internal control?

In this article, I reveal a step-by-step algorithm for independent counterparty verification, share tools, checklists, and practical cases from COREDO that will help not only minimize risks but also enhance your business’s investment appeal. If you want to get a practical guide to due diligence, adapted to the realities of the EU, Asia, and the CIS, I recommend reading to the end.

Due diligence: what it is and why to check a counterparty

Illustration for the section "Due diligence: what it is and why to check a counterparty" in the article "Conducting Due Diligence for Counterparty Verification Independently"

Due diligence: is a comprehensive legal, financial, and operational check of counterparties aimed at identifying risks, confirming the legal purity of the deal, and compliance with procedures. In practice, it is not just a formal collection of documents but a multi-level assessment system of corporate structure, beneficiaries, financial condition, and business reputation of a potential partner.

In international business, due diligence becomes a standard of corporate governance and internal control. Compliance officer, KYC, and AML procedures, counterparty audit: these are now not only regulatory requirements but also a strategic risk management tool.

Goals of due diligence for business

  • Risk assessment in working with counterparties: timely identification of signs of fraud, corporate conflicts, affiliation, and AML/CTF non-compliance.
  • Prevention of financial and reputational losses: reducing the likelihood of account blocking, fines, legal disputes, and negative publications.
  • Ensuring the legal purity of the deal: checking corporate documents, ownership chain, and history of court decisions.
  • Compliance with international compliance standards: integrating a risk-oriented approach, automating due diligence, and implementing internal company policies.

Types of due diligence: legal, financial, operational, anti-corruption

  • Legal due diligence: analysis of corporate structure, statutory documents, identifying affiliated persons, auditing corporate conflicts and court decisions.
  • Financial due diligence: analysis of financial statements, debt obligations, assessing solvency and tax risks.
  • Operational due diligence: checking business processes, internal policies, corporate governance, analyzing operational risks.
  • Anti-corruption due diligence: identifying corruption schemes, analyzing conflicts of interest, checking compliance with international AML/CTF standards.

Counterparty verification: step-by-step instruction

Illustration for the section "Counterparty verification: step-by-step instruction" in the article "Conducting Due Diligence for Counterparty Verification Independently"

Counterparty verification requires a systematic approach and step-by-step instruction: this reduces partnership risks and helps identify potential partner issues in a timely manner. For quality due diligence, it is important to form a team that can thoroughly assess both the legal and financial aspects of verification. Next, we will examine the key steps in organizing work and analyzing counterparty data.

Gathering a team for due diligence

In practice, COREDO has implemented dozens of projects where the success of due diligence was determined not only by the quality of tools but also by the competent organization of the process. It is important to define the goals of verification, gather a team with expertise in compliance, financial analysis, and corporate intelligence, appoint a responsible compliance officer, and implement internal control.

How to gather and analyze corporate documents

The first stage: auditing corporate documents: charter, registry extracts, meeting protocols, information about directors and shareholders. COREDO practice confirms: analysis of corporate structure and identification of affiliated persons allows early detection of fictitious companies, corporate conflicts, and hidden risks.

Particular attention is paid to controlling the ownership chain and analyzing debt obligations. In several COREDO cases, it was the audit of corporate documents that revealed signs of fraudulent schemes and non-compliance with internal company policies.

Verification of beneficiaries and ultimate owners

Proper verification of beneficiaries and identification of the ultimate beneficial owner (UBO): key to managing counterparty risks. The solution developed at COREDO includes analyzing the ownership chain, collecting supporting documents, checking for affiliation, and analyzing corporate connections through international databases.

In one recent deal in the Czech Republic, the COREDO team identified a hidden beneficiary connected to an offshore structure, allowing the client to back out of a risky deal and avoid AML/CTF violations consequences.

Financial reporting and solvency

Financial due diligence: this is not just a balance check but a deep analysis of financial statements, debt obligations, assessing solvency, and tax risks. At COREDO, we apply both classical financial analysis methods and scoring systems, allowing for performance comparisons with industry benchmarks.

Particular attention is paid to analyzing debt obligations and managing investment risks. In COREDO cases for EU clients, identifying hidden debts and overdue obligations became grounds for revising deal terms.

Customer verification for AML, sanctions, and PEP

Verification for AML/CTF compliance, sanctions lists, and PEP (politically exposed persons): a mandatory stage for any international business. The COREDO solution includes automated checks against international lists, regular database updates, and KYC procedure integration.

In COREDO practice, due diligence automation allowed reducing counterparty verification time from the UK from three days to several hours, reducing the risk of sanction list inclusion and ensuring compliance with international standards.

Reputation and business reliability assessment

Managing reputational risks: a task requiring a comprehensive approach: reputational audit, court decision analysis, corporate intelligence, fraud scheme identification. At COREDO, we integrate open data collection (OSINT), media publication analysis, court decisions, and industry platform reviews.

In a case for a Singapore client, a reputational audit revealed potential partner involvement in legal proceedings, which allowed for a revised cooperation strategy.

Open sources and due diligence automation

Modern tools for independent due diligence include automated verification systems, counterparty scoring, open data collection (OSINT), and corporate platform integration. COREDO’s experience shows that due diligence automation not only speeds up the process but also enhances verification quality through multi-channel analysis.

Due diligence in the EU and Asia: differences

Illustration for the section "Due diligence in the EU and Asia: differences" in the article "Conducting Due Diligence for Counterparty Verification Independently"
Due diligence in the EU and Asia have their differences, related to legislative specifics, information disclosure requirements, and established business practices. Understanding the specifics of each jurisdiction helps avoid risks and build transparent, effective business processes when entering new markets or making deals.

Therefore, it is important to understand the due diligence procedures characteristic of European countries in advance to minimize possible difficulties when doing business in the EU.

Due diligence for business in the EU: instruction

  • Define verification goals and gather a team.
  • Request corporate documents: charter, register excerpt, information about directors and shareholders.
  • Conduct corporate structure analysis, identify ultimate beneficiaries.
  • Assess financial statements, debt obligations, tax risks.
  • Check for AML/CTF compliance, sanction lists, and PEP.
  • Conduct a reputational audit using open sources and court decisions.
  • Document the results and integrate them into internal control.

Due diligence in Asia and Africa

In Asia and Africa, due diligence requires consideration of regional standards and corporate governance specifics. In several jurisdictions (e.g., Singapore, UAE), particular attention is paid to beneficiary identification, corporate structure analysis, and AML/CTF compliance verification.

The COREDO team encountered situations where verifying a counterparty in Asia required requesting documents from multiple state registries, using local services, and considering the national legislation specifics.

Counterparty verification according to international standards

Verification for compliance with international compliance standards (KYC, AML, CTF) is an integral part of due diligence for companies operating in the EU, UK, Singapore, and Dubai. COREDO practice confirms: integrating international standards into corporate policies and automating due diligence not only ensures regulatory compliance but also reduces operational and reputational risks.

Moving to the next section: For more effective implementation of these processes, it is important to use modern tools for independent due diligence.

Tools for independent due diligence

Illustration for the section "Tools for independent due diligence" in the article "Conducting Due Diligence for Counterparty Verification Independently"
Tools for independent due diligence allow a quick and objective assessment of future partners or counterparties’ reliability without involving external consultants. Thanks to modern services, key checks can be performed independently, providing vital information for decision-making at an early stage of partnership.

Services for counterparty verification

There are dozens of tools available on the market for independent legal entity verification: from international databases (World-Check, Dow Jones Risk & Compliance, LexisNexis) to specialized platforms for corporate structure analysis and financial reporting. At COREDO, we use a hybrid approach, combining automated verification systems with manual OSINT collection and corporate intelligence.

Due diligence automation: speed and quality

Due diligence automation allows scaling the process with an increasing number of counterparties, reducing the human factor, and speeding up decision-making. Implementing counterparty scoring, integrating with internal systems, and using efficiency metrics (verification speed, identified risk level, ROI) become best practices for due diligence in international business.

In one COREDO project, due diligence automation allowed a client from Estonia to process up to 100 new counterparties a month without increasing compliance officer staff, thus improving verification quality and reducing costs.

Risk assessment and management in the project

Illustration for the section "Risk assessment and management in the project" in the article "Conducting Due Diligence for Counterparty Verification Independently"
Risk assessment and management in the project require thorough work with any potential threat sources, among which interaction with counterparties stands as paramount. Mistakes at this stage can lead to financial losses and timeline disruptions, making counterparty analysis and verification fundamental tools for effective project risk management.

Typical mistakes in counterparty verification

  • Formal approach to analyzing corporate documents and ownership chain.
  • Ignoring checks for affiliation and ultimate beneficial owner.
  • Insufficient attention to debt obligation and financial statement analysis.
  • Lack of regular AML/CTF and sanction list compliance checks.
  • Underestimation of reputational risks and court decisions.

Due diligence mistakes: examples and consequences

In COREDO’s practice, there were cases where insufficient counterparty verification led to account blocking, legal proceedings, and loss of business reputation. For example, in one UK case, a client faced a sanction risk due to a hidden beneficiary, resulting in transaction blocking and the necessity to revise the entire supply chain.
Verification Stage Main Risks Tools/Methods of Identification Recommendations for Minimization
Corporate Document Analysis Fictitious companies, forged documents Open data collection (OSINT), registry requests Verify through official sources, use multiple services
Beneficiary Check Hidden owners, affiliated persons Corporate structure analysis, KYC Request supporting documents, use scoring systems
AML/CTF and Sanctions Sanction list inclusion International list checks Regular database updates, automation
Financial Analysis Insolvency, debts Report analysis, scoring Compare with industry indicators

Due diligence in international business: recommendations

Due diligence in international business: is an essential tool that helps uncover hidden risks, ensure transaction transparency, and protect company interests when operating in new markets. This material examines key recommendations for conducting due diligence, starting with transaction and partner selection check specifics.

Due diligence in procurement and partnership

  • Integrate due diligence into every stage of procurement and partner selection processes.
  • Appoint a compliance officer responsible for internal control and counterparty audits.
  • Implement automated verification systems and counterparty scoring.
  • Regularly update internal company policies considering changes in international compliance standards.

Due diligence effectiveness metrics and ROI

Evaluating the effectiveness of due diligence includes analyzing the following metrics:

  • Time to verify one counterparty.
  • Number of identified risks and prevented incidents.
  • ROI (return on investment) from due diligence implementation: savings on legal expenses, fines, reputational losses.
  • Level of automation and process scalability.
In COREDO practice, introducing due diligence allowed clients to reduce incidents by 40% and speed up entry into new EU and Asian markets.

Tips for entrepreneurs

Independent due diligence checklist:

  • Define verification goals and appoint a responsible person.
  • Request and analyze corporate documents.
  • Check the ownership chain and identify the ultimate beneficial owner.
  • Analyze financial statements and debt obligations.
  • Check for AML/CTF compliance, sanction lists, and PEP.
  • Conduct a reputational audit through OSINT and court decision analysis.
  • Document the results and integrate them into business processes.

Risk minimization tips:

  • Use several independent sources for verification.
  • Implement due diligence automation for scalability.
  • Regularly update internal policies and train the team.
  • Don’t limit to formal checks – analyze corporate connections, court decisions, and reputational risks.

Recommendations for selecting tools and automation:

  • Choose services integrated with international databases and supporting counterparty scoring.
  • Invest in due diligence automation to speed up processes and improve verification quality.

Major mistakes and how to avoid them:

  • Don’t rely solely on formal document collection.
  • Don’t ignore corporate structure and affiliation analysis.
  • Don’t neglect regular AML/CTF and sanction compliance checks.
With the tightening of international compliance standards and the growth of cross-border transactions, independent counterparty verification becomes a strategic business asset. COREDO’s experience shows: integrating due diligence into corporate practice not only minimizes risks but also creates new opportunities for growth and development in global markets.

In 2023, international regulators imposed fines on financial and non-financial companies for AML violations totaling over $6.6 billion. In the EU and Asia alone, the number of money laundering investigations increased by nearly 30% over the year, and compliance requirements have been tightened in all key jurisdictions. More than 60% of identified violations are related to insufficient automation of AML processes and errors in compliance audits.

Why do even large international companies continue to face risks of fines, account freezes, and loss of trust from banks? How to ensure full compliance with FATF, FinCEN, CFTC, DFS requirements and avoid critical errors in AML risk management? And most importantly, what solutions allow not only to minimize costs, but also to increase business investment attractiveness?

These questions confront executives, CFOs, and owners of international companies daily. In this article, I will explain in detail how outsourcing AML audit helps not only to reduce the risk of fines but also to build a sustainable compliance management strategy using the experience of COREDO in the EU, Asia, and Africa. Read the article to the end: you will receive a step-by-step guide, practical cases, and tools that really work.

AML Audit and Outsourcing for Business

Illustration for the section "AML Audit and Outsourcing for Business" in the article "How Outsourcing AML Audit Can Save Your Company From Fines"

AML audit and outsourcing for business are tools that allow companies to timely identify risks associated with money laundering and comply with legal requirements. In today’s conditions, a competent AML audit and effective outsourcing help businesses not only avoid fines but also build a reliable compliance control system, which is especially relevant for fast-growing and regulated industries.

AML Audit and Compliance Audit

AML audit is an independent comprehensive check of the effectiveness of an anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing system (AML/CFT) and compliance with international standards (FATF, EU, CFTC, FinCEN, DFS). This audit includes the analysis of AML/CFT policies, transaction monitoring, compliance process automation, digital client identification, and risk assessment related to offshore accounts and digital currencies.
Compliance audit is broader: it covers not only AML but all aspects of financial compliance, including due diligence of suppliers and partners, AML incident management, document verification, and suspicious transaction reporting (SAR). COREDO’s practice confirms that integrating AML audit into the overall corporate governance system increases transparency and reduces risks at all levels of business.

Fighting money laundering is not only an obligation to regulators but also a strategic tool to prevent financial crimes, increase partner trust, and prove compliance for banks and investors.

Internal or External AML Audit – What to Choose?

Internal AML audit relies on the company’s own resources but is often limited by the level of expertise and access to international practices. Outsourcing AML audit involves hiring independent experts to conduct an external review of AML, analyze AML/CFT policies, and assess the effectiveness of KYC and AML in the business.

COREDO’s experience has shown that an independent external audit can reveal hidden risks that are difficult to detect within the company, especially when dealing with offshore structures, digital currencies, and complex money laundering schemes. Importantly, outsourcing AML audit ensures due diligence of suppliers and partners and facilitates the exchange of information between companies and auditors without conflicts of interest.
Criterion Internal AML Audit Outsourcing AML Audit
Expertise Limited by internal team Access to international experts
Cost High fixed costs Flexible payment, cost optimization
Relevance of practices Depends on internal training Use of best global practices
Scalability Limited by company resources Easily scalable with business growth
Independence of assessment Possible conflict of interest Objective external perspective
Speed of implementation Slower due to bureaucracy Faster due to experience and technology

AML Violations Fines in the EU, Asia, and Africa

Illustration for the section "AML Violations Fines in the EU, Asia, and Africa" in the article "How Outsourcing AML Audit Can Save Your Company From Fines"

AML violations fines in the EU, Asia, and Africa are becoming more severe: regulators are tightening control and actively applying sanctions against companies ignoring compliance requirements. Violations in the field of money laundering prevention lead not only to million-dollar fines but also to account freezes and, in some cases, loss of the right to operate in the international market. Let’s further review the specific fines and sanctions in different regions.

Fines and Sanctions for AML Violations

Regulatory requirements in the EU, Asia, and Africa for AML are becoming increasingly stringent. Violations of FATF, FinCEN, CFTC, DFS standards lead to severe sanctions: multimillion-dollar fines, account freezes, license revocations, bans on working with international banks. In some cases, companies lose market access due to insufficient reporting of suspicious activities (SAR) or ineffective transaction monitoring.

Real experience of COREDO assisting clients in the EU and Asia shows: even minor errors in AML/CFT policies or AML process automation can lead to AML fines and the urgent need to revise the entire AML risk management system.

Fines for Ineffective AML Audit

In 2022, a European fintech startup that turned to COREDO received a regulatory notice amounting to 1.2 million euros due to errors in outsourcing AML implementation: the contractor failed to take into account the specificity of offshore accounts and did not detect complex money laundering schemes through digital currencies. Only after conducting an independent AML audit and revising compliance processes was it possible to restore banks’ trust and avoid new sanctions.

COREDO’s practice confirms: key mistakes in outsourcing AML audit implementation include insufficient due diligence of the contractor, weak integration of AML services into business processes, and lack of training for AML outsourcing staff. Such missteps lead to risks of failing to meet AML requirements and losing investment attractiveness.

Outsourcing AML Audit: Benefits

Illustration for the section "Outsourcing AML Audit: Benefits" in the article "How Outsourcing AML Audit Can Save Your Company From Fines"

Outsourcing AML audit offers the opportunity not only to enhance regulatory compliance effectiveness but also to gain an independent expert risk assessment. External specialists help identify weaknesses and provide a fresh perspective, essential for companies striving to minimize potential violations and optimize processes.

Outsourcing AML Audit: How to Reduce Risks

The solution developed at COREDO for international clients is based on independent external AML review, deep risk analytics, and KYC and AML automation for businesses. This approach not only prevents AML fines but also establishes a system for preventing financial crimes, which is crucial for companies with offshore structures and digital assets.

Implementing outsourced AML provides proof of compliance for banks and investors, enhances partner trust, and reduces the likelihood of account freezes or license suspensions. AML risk management becomes transparent and predictable, granting businesses a competitive edge in the international market.

Cost of Outsourcing AML Audit

The cost of outsourcing AML audit varies depending on business scale, transaction complexity, and audit volume. However, COREDO’s practice shows: cost optimization in compliance is achieved by reducing hidden expenses (training, IT infrastructure support, regulatory updates), while AML audit ROI is expressed in reducing fines likelihood, speeding up client verification (KYC), and increasing investment attractiveness.

To evaluate outsourcing AML audit effectiveness, I recommend using metrics such as the number of prevented AML incidents, suspicious operations processing speed, compliance process automation level, and adherence to international standards.

Thus, outsourcing allows businesses not only to optimize costs but also to flexibly adapt AML processes to the specifics and scale of activity.

Flexibility of AML Solutions with Outsourcing

Scalability of AML solutions is a key factor for fast-growing companies. COREDO’s experience showed that outsourced AML implementation allows flexible adaptation of processes to new markets, integration of AML with corporate governance, and maintenance of compliance with EU, Asia, and Africa requirements without increasing internal costs.

COREDO’s comprehensive support includes regular AML/CFT policy audits, transaction monitoring automation, and integration of new AML technologies, ensuring the resilience and flexibility of business processes with any volume of operations.

Automation of AML Processes in Outsourcing

Illustration for the section "Automation of AML Processes in Outsourcing" in the article "How Outsourcing AML Audit Can Save Your Company From Fines"

Automation of AML processes in outsourcing allows companies not only to reduce operational costs and minimize human errors but also to quickly adapt to modern regulatory requirements. Cutting-edge solutions in KYC and AML automation become critically important tools for enhancing efficiency, transparency, and business sustainability in 2025.

Automation of KYC and AML: Tools for 2025

The automation of AML processes and KYC is becoming standard for international companies. The use of artificial intelligence in AML, digital customer identification, and compliance process automation allows reducing compliance costs and increasing the accuracy of detecting suspicious activities.

COREDO’s team has implemented KYC and AML automation projects for fintech companies in the EU and Asia, integrating solutions for document verification, transaction monitoring, and AML incident management. This allowed clients to speed up onboarding processes, reduce AML risks, and provide transparent reporting for regulators.

We will further explore how to effectively integrate AML services into business processes and the advantages this brings to companies.

Integration of AML Services in Business

Integration of AML services into business processes is a crucial stage for sustainable growth. COREDO’s practice confirms that the implementation of new AML technologies, AML incident management, and work with digital currencies and crypto assets in the AML context require constant updating of procedures and staff training.

Special attention is given to integrating AML audit with corporate governance, which allows not only identifying and eliminating risks but also forming a compliance culture at all organizational levels.

Choosing an AML Audit Provider: Criteria and Mistakes

Illustration for the section "Choosing an AML Audit Provider: Criteria and Mistakes" in the article "How Outsourcing AML Audit Can Save Your Company From Fines"

Choosing an AML audit provider requires a strict approach to key criteria and attention to common mistakes. It is essential to consider not only the contractor’s experience but also the technologies they use to ensure security and compliance with legal requirements. Next, we’ll explore how to choose a contractor wisely and what to focus on.

How to Choose a Contractor: Experience and Technologies

Selecting an AML audit provider is a strategic decision. Key criteria include experience in international jurisdictions, proficiency in AML process automation technologies, compliance with FATF standards, the presence of due diligence cases for suppliers and partners, and employee training and awareness programs.

I recommend requesting examples of successful implementations from the contractor, analyzing the digital identification tools they use, compliance process automation, and their level of interaction with regulators in the EU, Asia, and Africa.

Mistakes in Outsourcing AML Audit

Common mistakes include insufficient preparation for external AML audit, weak information exchange between companies and auditors, and lack of AML outsourcing staff training. COREDO’s experience shows that successful implementation requires not only technical integration of services but also forming an internal compliance culture.

It is important to avoid situations where the contractor does not consider business specifics, does not conduct regular AML/CFT policy audits, and does not ensure transparency of suspicious transaction reporting (SAR).

To enhance preparation effectiveness, let’s explore key steps that will help successfully pass an AML audit and correctly act afterwards.

AML Audit: How to Prepare and What to Do Next

AML audit is not only a formal check but also an opportunity to objectively assess the company’s readiness to meet legal requirements. To successfully pass an AML audit and minimize risks after its completion, it is crucial to prepare staff and business processes in advance and establish consistent actions at all control stages.

How to Prepare Staff and Business Processes?

Quality preparation for an external AML audit begins with training and raising employee awareness. COREDO’s solution includes the development of individual training programs, modeling AML incidents, and implementing AML incident management systems.

Special attention is paid to document verification, proper recordkeeping, and automation of KYC and AML processes for the business. This minimizes human factors and improves interaction effectiveness with external auditors.

Integrating Audit into Risk Management Strategy

Integrating AML audit results into the compliance system is the key to sustainable development. COREDO’s practice confirms: regular updates of AML/CFT policies, transaction monitoring automation, and AML integration with corporate governance not only reduce AML risks but also enhance trust from partners, banks, and investors.

I recommend using external AML audit results to adjust business processes, optimize compliance costs, and form a unified risk management strategy.

Key Takeaways on the Topic

Outsourcing AML audit is not just a way to reduce the risk of AML fines; it is also a tool for enhancing the company’s business value. COREDO’s experience in the EU, Asia, and Africa shows that independent AML audits, KYC and AML process automation, integration of new technologies, and employee training not only comply with international standards but also exceed market requirements.

For maximum ROI from AML audit, it is important to:

  • Choose a provider with international experience and technological expertise.
  • Integrate AML services into business processes and corporate governance.
  • Regularly conduct employee training and update AML/CFT policies.
  • Use efficiency metrics and analyze hidden compliance costs.
  • Implement KYC and AML automation to reduce costs and increase transparency.

Questions on External AML Audit for Business

  1. What strategic advantages does outsourcing AML audit provide for international companies?
    Outsourcing AML audit ensures independent risk assessment, access to international practices, scalability flexibility, and reduced compliance costs.
  2. How to assess the return on investment (ROI) from implementing an external AML audit?
    ROI of AML audit is calculated based on prevented fines, accelerated KYC, increased banks’ and investors’ trust, and optimization of internal compliance expenses.
  3. What risks exist when outsourcing AML audit and how to minimize them?
    Key risks include choosing an unsuitable contractor, insufficient service integration, and lack of employee training. Minimizing them involves thorough provider due diligence and regular independent AML audits.
  4. How does the automation of KYC and AML processes affect compliance department efficiency?
    Automation reduces costs, speeds up data processing, increases the accuracy of suspicious activity detection, and facilitates suspicious activity reporting (SAR).
  5. What requirements do EU and Asian regulators have for external AML audit?
    Regulators require regular independent AML audits, transaction monitoring automation, transparent reporting, and integration of AML services into business processes.
  6. How to prepare employees for interaction with external AML auditors?
    It is recommended to provide specialized training, model AML incidents, implement incident management systems, and maintain information exchange between companies and auditors.
  7. What technologies are used for automation of AML processes in outsourcing?
    Solutions based on artificial intelligence, digital customer identification, compliance process automation, and transaction monitoring are used, integrated with corporate governance.
  8. How often should an independent AML audit be conducted to meet international standards?
    It is recommended to conduct an independent AML audit at least once a year and when entering new markets or changing the business model.
  9. How to integrate the results of an external AML audit into corporate risk management strategy?
    Use audit results to adjust AML/CFT policies, update KYC and AML procedures, optimize business processes, and form a unified risk management strategy.
  10. How to avoid typical mistakes when implementing outsourced AML audit?
    Conduct thorough due diligence of the contractor, ensure employee training, integrate AML services into business processes, and maintain constant information exchange with auditors.
If you are looking for a strategic partner to implement an effective AML audit and build a robust compliance system, COREDO’s experience in the EU, Asia, and Africa is ready to be your competitive advantage.
In 2025, according to FINTRAC, the transaction volume passing through Money Service Business (MSB) in Canada surpassed CAD 1.6 trillion: and this figure continues to grow at double-digit rates annually. This scale is no coincidence: Canada has established itself as one of the most transparent and technologically advanced financial markets for international business. But behind this growth lies another side: tightening AML/CTF regulations, new requirements for licensing financial services, and constant pressure from regulators on transparency and accountability.
Why are even experienced entrepreneurs and financial directors facing registration refusals for MSB, account blocks, and FINTRAC sanctions today? How to minimize these risks, obtain a financial or crypto-license in Canada, build an effective compliance system, and scale the business without failures?

Let me ask a direct question: are you ready for the new AML Canada standards and transparency requirements that are coming into force this year? If not, this article will help you not only understand the details but also gain a strategic advantage. I’ll explain how the COREDO team implements projects for MSB registration, obtaining a FINTRAC license, implementing KYC/AML procedures, and providing comprehensive legal support to ensure you can confidently build international financial services based out of the Canadian jurisdiction. Read the article to the end – here you will find not only answers but practical tools for real growth.

MSB License in Canada: What It Is and Who Needs It

Illustration for the section "MSB License in Canada: What It Is and Who Needs It" in the article "Financial and Crypto-Licenses in Canada - All About MSB in 2025"

The Canada MSB license is a permit to conduct activities in the field of money transfers, currency exchange, cryptocurrency transactions, and other financial services, issued by FINTRAC (Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada). This license has become a standard for companies dealing with cross-border payments, crypto assets, and international transfers.
In recent years, there has been steady growth in the number of applications for a financial license in Canada, along with stricter requirements for applicants. At COREDO, we see the MSB license becoming not just a formality but a critical element for entering the North American market and integrating with global fintech platforms.

Types of Activities under the MSB License

  • Money transfers (including cross-border payments)
  • Currency and cryptocurrency exchange (crypto-license Canada)
  • Issuance and servicing of payment instruments
  • Operations with prepaid cards
  • Management of MSB branches and agents to expand geography
Implemented case by COREDO: registration of a legal entity under MSB for a large fintech startup from the EU, which, due to the FINTRAC license, was able to legally provide cryptocurrency exchange and international transfer services to clients in 27 countries.

Who Is Required to Obtain an MSB License

In Canada, all companies engaging in at least one type of MSB activity are subject to licensing requirements. Exceptions are minimal, such as companies that only deal with internal settlements and do not accept funds from third parties do not need a license.
At COREDO, special attention is given to due diligence on MSB owners and directors, as well as constructing a transparent MSB corporate governance system: this is critically important for successfully passing compliance procedures and preventing denials from the regulator.

MSB Registration in Canada – FINTRAC Requirements

Illustration for the section "MSB Registration in Canada - FINTRAC Requirements" in the article "Financial and Crypto-Licenses in Canada - All About MSB in 2025"

MSB registration in Canada is a multi-stage process that requires not only document collection but also strategic planning. A FINTRAC license entails comprehensive compliance checks with AML compliance in Canada and international compliance standards.

Documents Required for an MSB License: Requirements

  • Founding documents and personal data of the management
  • Detailed organizational structure of the MSB
  • Business plan for the license with financial forecasts
  • AML/CTF policy and description of KYC procedures
  • Confirmation of a virtual office or physical address
  • References confirming the reliability of owners and directors (due diligence)
The solution developed at COREDO includes preparing the complete set of documents and guidance at all stages of interaction with FINTRAC, minimizing the risk of refusal.

Virtual Office or Physical Address – What to Choose?

A virtual office for MSB is permissible and actively used by international companies. On the other hand, to open a bank account for MSB, confirmation of a real presence is often required. The COREDO team helps find the optimal solution, considering banking requirements and the specifics of interaction with Canadian financial institutions.

Verification of Owners and Directors, Due Diligence

Verification of MSB owners and directors is one of the most challenging stages. FINTRAC evaluates not only the absence of criminal records but also experience in the financial services industry, compliance of the corporate structure with international AML standards, as well as transparency of funding sources. At COREDO, we implement internal audits and appoint a compliance officer at early stages, which significantly speeds up coordination and reduces the likelihood of denial.

AML Policy for MSB in Canada

Illustration for the section "AML Policy for MSB in Canada" in the article "Financial and Crypto-Licenses in Canada - All About MSB in 2025"

AML Canada: it’s not just a formality; it’s the foundation of a sustainable business. In 2025, FINTRAC tightened AML requirements/CTF policy for MSB, including mandatory transaction monitoring, KYC and CTF procedures implementation, and regular reporting of suspicious operations.

KYC: Automation and Procedure Implementation

Modern KYC policy in Canada requires not only customer identification but also continual monitoring of their transactions. Implementing AML procedures in MSB, based on COREDO experience, becomes more effective with the use of AML automation technologies: integration with fintech platforms, use of machine learning to detect suspicious transactions, automation of data collection and verification about customers.

Responsibilities and Requirements for an AML Officer

The AML officer (anti-money laundering officer) is a key figure for MSB compliance in Canada. Requirements for the experience of an AML officer include knowledge of local and international legislation, experience in implementing internal policies, conducting internal controls, and audits. At COREDO, we select specialists with relevant certification and experience in international structures, ensuring compliance with the strictest standards.

MSB Reporting to FINTRAC: Fines and Sanctions

MSB reporting to FINTRAC includes regular submission of information on suspicious operations, updating branch and agent data, and annual activity reports. The absence of an MSB license or non-compliance with AML/CTF policies entails FINTRAC’s sanction measures: from large fines to full activity blocking.
Thus, careful adherence to all FINTRAC requirements and maintaining a high level of compliance are key aspects for successful MSB work in Canada. Next, let’s look at what constitutes the cost of obtaining an MSB license.

Cost of an MSB License in Canada

Illustration for the section "Cost of an MSB License in Canada" in the article "Financial and Crypto-Licenses in Canada - All About MSB in 2025"

The cost of a Canada MSB license comprises direct and indirect expenses, as well as costs for maintaining compliance and implementing AML procedures. Financial forecasts for the MSB license should contemplate not only initial investments but also regular expenses for legal support, virtual office rent, staff salaries, and process automation.

Direct and Indirect Expenses for the License

  • Government fees for registering a legal entity under MSB
  • Payment for document preparation services for the MSB license
  • Cost of virtual office rental and bank account opening for MSB
Indirect costs include expenses for implementing AML/CTF policy, staff training, IT infrastructure maintenance, and regular audits.

Financial Risks and ROI Calculation

Assessing the financial risks of MSB includes analyzing potential fines, compliance costs, and possible delays when interacting with banks. At COREDO, we develop financial forecasts for the MSB license and calculate ROI for MSB considering all variables: from licensing costs to expenses for scaling and integration with fintech platforms.

MSB in Canada: Branches, Agents, Fintech

Illustration for the section "MSB in Canada: Branches, Agents, Fintech" in the article "Financial and Crypto-Licenses in Canada - All About MSB in 2025"

Scaling MSB in Canada requires a structured system for managing branches and agents, as well as integration with modern fintech solutions to ensure transparency of financial flows and compliance with international AML standards.
Effective interaction between branches and agents becomes a key factor for sustainable growth of MSB and requires special attention to risk management and regulatory compliance.

Managing Branches and Agents – Risks and Requirements

Managing MSB branches and agents involves regularly updating data in FINTRAC, conducting partner due diligence, and implementing reliability assessment criteria. COREDO’s solutions allow centralized control and minimize risks associated with agent activities in foreign markets.

Cross-border Payments and AML Standards

Cross-border payments require particular attention to international AML standards and MSB cybersecurity. COREDO’s experience shows that implementing comprehensive monitoring procedures and transparency of financial flows increases investor and regulator trust, as well as reduces the likelihood of account blocks.

Innovation and Automation for MSB

AML automation technologies are becoming the standard for MSB in 2025. Integration with fintech platforms, automation of AML procedures, and using artificial intelligence for transaction monitoring significantly reduce costs and enhance compliance efficiency. The COREDO team implements innovative solutions that not only meet regulatory requirements but also lead market trends.

Legal Support for MSB: Risks and FINTRAC Audit

Comprehensive legal support for MSB: a key factor for success at all stages, from registration to scaling. Compliance for MSB in Canada requires continuous internal control, regular audits, and prompt preparation for FINTRAC checks.

Corporate Governance and Internal Control

Effective MSB corporate governance is built on a transparent organizational structure, clear delineation of authority, and regular internal audits. At COREDO, we implement best international practices, enabling our clients to successfully pass audits and minimize regulatory sanction risks.

Errors Leading to Sanctions in SEO

Common mistakes in obtaining an MSB license: incomplete document packages, inadequate AML/CTF policy development, absence of a qualified AML officer. Consequences of non-compliance with AML/CTF policies – from license denial to large fines and activity blockages.
COREDO’s practice shows: only a systematic approach and comprehensive legal support can mitigate these risks.

Practical Recommendations for Entrepreneurs

Practical recommendations for entrepreneurs will help navigate the key steps and nuances of doing business in Canada. The following subsections contain specific advice on launching and effectively managing MSB so every entrepreneur can confidently navigate the local business environment.

Launching and Managing MSB in Canada

Stage Practical Steps and Recommendations
Registration of a Legal Entity Prepare founding documents, choose MSB structure
Business Plan Preparation Develop financial forecasts, describe the business model
document collection for the license Gather personal data of management, company structure
Implementation of AML/CTF Policy Develop KYC/AML procedures, appoint an AML officer
opening a bank account Select a bank, consider virtual office requirements
Implementation of Automation Integrate AML/KYC platforms, automate monitoring
Managing Branches and Agents Implement due diligence, update data in FINTRAC
Preparation for FINTRAC Audit Conduct internal audit, regularly update policy

Tips for Choosing a Partner:

  • Evaluate the team’s experience in MSB registration and obtaining a FINTRAC license
  • Check for expertise in international AML standards and compliance
  • Ensure the presence of comprehensive solutions for automation and support

Recommendations for Cost Reduction:

  • Use a virtual office for MSB if acceptable by the bank
  • Implement KYC/AML automation to reduce personnel costs
  • Regularly update business processes in accordance with new FINTRAC requirements
Adhering to these steps and strategies, as confirmed by COREDO’s practice, allows not only to obtain an MSB license in Canada but also to build a sustainable, scalable, and transparent international financial business.
The year 2025 marks a record growth in the number of international crypto companies facing increased MiCA regulations in the EU, while interest in alternative jurisdictions rises. According to the European Blockchain Observatory, in just the past year, over 40% of crypto services in Europe revised their structures due to new CASP and DASP rules. Meanwhile, the number of company registrations in Panama for crypto business increased by 27% (data from the Panamanian Chamber of Commerce, 2024).
Why are entrepreneurs increasingly looking at Panama? Which choice provides a strategic advantage: stringent EU licensing or the flexibility of an offshore jurisdiction?
In this article, I will not only compare MiCA and Panama: you will receive a practical guide based on COREDO’s experience, with real scenarios, risks, and recommendations. If you’re looking for answers about licensing, AML compliance, scaling, and risk management, read on. Here you’ll find not only analysis but also strategic ideas for long-term growth.

MiCA Requirements for Crypto Business in the EU

MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) is the most significant reform of virtual asset regulation in Europe, covering CASP, DASP, and all key aspects of blockchain compliance. For a legal entity registration in Europe now requires not only a standard incorporation procedure but also obtaining an EU crypto license (VASP/CASP), certification, implementing comprehensive AML procedures and KYC processes, as well as ensuring transparent financial reporting and minimum share capital (from €125,000 for most CASP).
Implementing MiCA required crypto companies to introduce new administration standards, regular audits and certifications, as well as a detailed risk management system. Our experience at COREDO showed: breaking into the EU market now requires not only legal support for crypto companies but also a deep restructuring of business processes to meet institutional investor standards. Without this, building trust with banks and attracting major investments is impossible.

Registering a Crypto Business in Panama

Panama for crypto business: above all, regulatory flexibility, minimal bureaucratic barriers, and quick company registration (2–4 weeks). For international crypto projects, Panama offers a unique combination: no mandatory crypto license, basic AML/KYC procedures, a flexible tax system, and the ability to legalize income through transparent offshore structures.
The solution developed at COREDO for clients targeting Panama includes configuring KYC and AML procedures according to international standards, organizing corporate governance, and optimizing Panama’s tax residency to reduce international taxation. Panama allows quickly scaling crypto services without sacrificing the safety of digital assets and financial transparency: provided a competent implementation of the risk management system.

MiCA or Panama – What Should Crypto Businesses Choose?

Illustration for the section "MiCA or Panama - What Should Crypto Businesses Choose?" in the article "Should You Consider Panama Instead of MiCA"
MiCA or Panama – what should crypto businesses choose?
This question is especially pressing today for companies needing to choose between the strict but transparent rules of the European Union and more flexible offshore regulations. Understanding the differences in licensing requirements will help make an informed decision on the most suitable jurisdiction for launching or relocating a crypto project.

Company Licensing Requirements

MiCA mandates obligatory VASP/CASP licensing, strict certification, minimum share capital, and transparent ownership structures. In the EU, the process of obtaining a crypto license takes from 3 to 6 months and requires significant expenditure on documentation preparation, implementing client verification systems, ensuring digital asset security, and meeting financial reporting requirements.
In Panama, Licensing cryptocurrencies is not mandatory for most types of activities with virtual assets. Company registration in Panama takes 2–4 weeks, there is no set minimum share capital, and client verification and digital asset security requirements are determined by the company’s internal policy. COREDO’s practice confirms: this approach is especially appreciated by startups and projects focused on fast launches and scaling.

AML/KYC: What It Is and Why It’s Needed

MiCA enforces strict AML compliance requirements, including mandatory staff certification, blockchain compliance implementation, and regular regulator checks. All CASPs are required to conduct deep customer identification, transaction monitoring, and keep detailed financial records. This ensures maximum transparency of business processes and minimizes income legalization risks.
In Panama, AML/KYC procedures remain flexible: the company independently determines the depth of client checks, relying on international standards and FATF recommendations. The COREDO team implemented for clients in Panama the introduction of multi-level KYC procedures, transaction monitoring automation, and setting up a risk management system, which ensured financial transparency of the crypto business and increased trust from banks.

Access to Investments Through Banks

In the EU, licensed crypto companies have access to a wide banking infrastructure: most European banks are willing to serve licensed CASP/DASP, which facilitates attracting institutional investors and integrating with payment systems. MiCA also fosters a growth in trust from banks and investors due to high transparency and mandatory reporting.
In Panama, the banking infrastructure for crypto companies is limited, and access to international payments depends on the business structure and the chosen bank. The solution developed by COREDO for clients includes the selection of partner banks specializing in servicing crypto services, as well as organizing corporate governance to increase trust. For attracting investments through MiCA, Panama is not always optimal. On the other hand, for flexible international crypto projects, it can become an effective launching pad.

Regulatory Costs and Timelines – What You Need to Know?

The cost of a cryptocurrency license in the EU includes not only state fees and minimum share capital but also expenses for legal support, audits, AML/KYC procedures deployment, and maintaining corporate governance. On average, the costs for launching CASP in the EU exceed €150,000, and registration takes 3–6 months.
In Panama, the costs for company registration and launching a crypto business are minimal: registration takes 2–4 weeks, accompaniment and AML/KYC procedures implementation expenses are significantly lower, and the jurisdiction’s economic efficiency allows a quick market entry with minimal costs.

Risks of MiCA and Panama: Legal and Financial

Illustration for the section "Risks of MiCA and Panama: Legal and Financial" in the article "Should You Consider Panama Instead of MiCA"
Risks of MiCA and Panama are not just legal nuances, but also substantial financial challenges for crypto companies and startups. New regulatory requirements affect business stability, operational transparency, and client protection, and non-compliance with these norms can lead to severe consequences for companies of all scales.

Consequences of Non-Compliance with MiCA for Business

Non-compliance with MiCA threatens crypto companies not only with fines but also with the complete loss of VASP/CASP licenses, account blockages, and the inability to attract institutional investors. MiCA implementation complexities are associated with constantly updated requirements, the need for regular certification, audits, and high compliance costs. COREDO’s experience shows: for long-term financial stability in the EU, it is critically important to build a risk management system and ensure compliance not only with national but also international standards.

Risks of Operating in Panama

Panama is attractive for international crypto projects due to its flexibility but requires special attention to risk management when choosing the jurisdiction. The main constraints are limited access to the European banking infrastructure, the need to self-implement AML/KYC procedures, and risks associated with unclear legislative clarity. Long-term consequences of choosing Panama over MiCA can include difficulties with income legalization, international taxation, and attracting institutional investors. COREDO’s practice confirms: competent setup of client verification systems and corporate governance can minimize these risks.

Scaling Crypto Services: How to Enter the Market

Illustration for the section "Scaling Crypto Services: How to Enter the Market" in the article "Should You Consider Panama Instead of MiCA"
Scaling Crypto Services requires a well-thought-out strategy and an understanding of the peculiarities of each jurisdiction to successfully enter the international market. Below we will consider key aspects of scaling a crypto project using the example of Panama and explore what is important to consider when choosing a country to launch crypto products.

Thus, choosing Panama as a jurisdiction for scaling a crypto project requires careful preparation and consideration of local features, which will be discussed in more detail below.

How to Scale a Crypto Project in Panama

Panama for scaling crypto services means fast launch speed, minimal bureaucracy, and the ability to flexibly adapt the business model for different markets. Regulatory flexibility allows quickly testing new products, integrating innovative solutions, and scaling the crypto project without the need for complex certification procedures. The COREDO team implemented projects for clients in Panama where, by optimizing internal KYC and AML procedures, markets in Latin America and Asia were entered within 2–3 months.

Entering the European Market Through Panama

Company registration in Panama does not close the way to the European market but requires the construction of a hybrid structure: part of the operations can be carried out through European partners or subsidiaries that comply with MiCA. An alternative to MiCA is creating an international holding structure with a center in Panama and operating companies in the EU. This scenario allows attracting investments through MiCA and simultaneously leveraging Panama’s economic efficiency. COREDO’s solution for such clients includes a comparative analysis of jurisdictions and developing a phased strategy for entering the European market.
Thus, the choice of structure should be based on individual business goals and the degree of readiness to comply with European requirements.

Recommendations for Entrepreneurs

Illustration for the section "Recommendations for Entrepreneurs" in the article "Should You Consider Panama Instead of MiCA"

Recommendations for entrepreneurs allow you to prepare in advance for the main challenges that businesses face in practice. The following points will help reduce regulatory and financial risks through the implementation of proven approaches to threat assessment and risk management.

How to Reduce Regulatory and Financial Risks

  • Implement multi-level AML procedures and KYC processes that meet international FATF standards.
  • Set up a risk management system and blockchain compliance to monitor transactions and prevent income legalization.
  • Organize corporate governance with clear distribution of responsibilities and transparent financial reporting.
  • Utilize legal support for crypto companies to timely update procedures and comply with new requirements.

Panama or MiCA for Crypto Business: What to Choose?

  • Evaluate the ROI when choosing a jurisdiction: compare launch costs, registration timelines, share capital requirements, and potential scaling constraints.
  • Consider the long-term consequences of choosing Panama over MiCA: access to banking infrastructure, the ability to attract institutional investors, compliance with international standards.
  • The economic efficiency of the jurisdiction should be combined with the transparency of business processes and the ability to legalize income.

Common SEO Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

  • Underestimating the complexity of implementing AML/KYC procedures and blockchain compliance.
  • Ignoring corporate governance and financial reporting requirements.
  • Lack of a European market entry strategy when registering in Panama.
  • Using outdated administration models without considering new standards.
COREDO’s practice confirms: timely implementation of new administration standards and legal support for crypto companies help avoid most mistakes and ensure long-term business sustainability.
Thus, a comprehensive approach to internal processes and compliance with international standards becomes critically important: the question arises: choose Panama or operate under MiCA rules?

Panama or MiCA: What to Choose?

Illustration for the section "Panama or MiCA: What to Choose?" in the article "Should You Consider Panama Instead of MiCA"

**How to choose between Panama and MiCA for crypto business?**
The choice depends on your strategy: if priority is a fast launch and flexibility, Panama is preferable; if access to European investors and banks is needed, MiCA is the optimal solution.
**What advantages does company registration in Panama offer for crypto services?**
Minimal registration timelines, low costs, flexible AML/KYC, and the ability to scale without bureaucracy.
**What risks does the transition to MiCA involve for existing crypto businesses?**
High regulatory costs, the need for constant audits and certification, the risk of license loss for non-compliance.
**How to ensure financial transparency for a crypto company in Panama?**
Implement internal reporting standards, automate transaction monitoring, and use international auditing practices.

Panama or MiCA – What to Choose for Crypto Business

Criterion Panama MiCA (EU)
Licensing No special crypto license required Mandatory crypto license (VASP, CASP)
AML/KYC Basic requirements, flexibility Strict regulations, certification
Banking Infrastructure Limited, depends on the bank More accessible for licensed companies
Registration Timelines 2-4 weeks 3-6 months
Cost Low expenses High costs (minimum capital, fees)
Scalability High, minimal bureaucracy Restricted by regulatory requirements
Transparency Depends on the company’s internal policy High, mandatory reporting
Investor Trust Medium, depends on the structure High, especially for institutional

Consequences of Choosing Panama Instead of MiCA

The strategic choice between Panama and MiCA determines not only current regulatory costs but also the financial stability of the company, access to international taxation, and prospects for attracting institutional investors. Panama for crypto-business is about flexibility, speed, and economic efficiency. At the same time, for long-term sustainability and compliance with international standards, competent corporate governance and the implementation of best AML compliance practices will be required.
The solution that the COREDO team develops for clients is always built on analyzing long-term consequences: only in this way can sustained growth, transparency, and trust from partners and investors be ensured. choosing a jurisdiction is not just a formality, but a strategic step that determines the future of your crypto business.

The implementation of MiCA regulation in Poland has become not just another stage of tightening control, but a real paradigm shift for the market. Previously, the registration of crypto business in Europe, and in particular in Poland, was based on national standards, where the role of the KNF (Financial Supervision Commission) was key, but the framework was relatively flexible. Now, the EU CASP license has become a universal “pass” for cross-border crypto services, and the AML/KYC and compliance requirements are unified for the entire European market.

Thus, the transition to regulation according to MiCA standards inevitably entails a revision of approaches to licensing crypto business in Poland, which is detailed in the new requirements for market participants.

Licensing of Crypto Business in Poland: Changes

Before the implementation of MiCA, the process of obtaining a crypto license in Poland was relatively quick, with minimal capital requirements, a standard procedure for checking beneficiaries, and basic internal control. Intra-group compliance procedures were often limited to formal policies, and integration with the EU anti-money laundering directive remained at the company’s discretion.

With the implementation of MiCA, the situation changes significantly:

  • The capital requirements for CASP start at €50,000, and only own funds are considered.
  • The implementation of the MiCA transition period Poland implies mandatory integration of new standards into national law, requiring a review of all documentation and business processes.
  • Compliance becomes an integral part of operational activity: internal audit, enhanced KYC, regular reporting on suspicious transactions, and mandatory sanctions list checks.

COREDO’s experience shows: companies that started restructuring their AML/KYC procedures in advance and integrated risk assessment of crypto assets went through Licensing faster and with fewer costs.

EU CASP License for Business

MiCA opens fundamentally new horizons for Polish crypto companies. The EU CASP license provides European passporting: after approval by the KNF, you gain the right to provide services throughout the EU without needing to obtain separate licenses in each country. This radically simplifies scaling strategies for crypto businesses in the EU and significantly increases the investment appeal of crypto companies.
The COREDO team has implemented several projects on cross-border licensing: for example, for a client in the custodial services sector, we built a model in which the Polish license became the foundation for entering the markets of the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Cyprus with minimal additional costs and without creating separate structures in each jurisdiction.

MiCA Requirements for Crypto Companies in Poland

Illustration for the section "MiCA Requirements for Crypto Companies in Poland" in the article "Crypto License in Poland - How MiCA Changed the Rules"
MiCA sets standards that affect all key aspects of crypto companies’ activities: from AML/KYC to IT infrastructure and internal control requirements. The KNF Poland financial supervision now operates in close cooperation with European regulators, and bank accounts for crypto businesses in Poland are opened only with full compliance with the new standards.

As a result, crypto companies in Poland require constant procedure updates, making the implementation of new AML/KYC standards a key step towards full compliance with MiCA.

AML/KYC: New Standards and Practice

The impact of MiCA on AML procedures cannot be overestimated: now crypto companies are required to implement not only standard KYC procedures but also advanced transaction control mechanisms, automatic reporting on suspicious operations, and regular compliance checks against sanctions lists.

COREDO’s practice confirms: automating the assessment of crypto asset risks and implementing comprehensive AML/KYC policies can significantly reduce the likelihood of refusal during licensing and minimize the risks of fines.

MiCA Financial and Technical Requirements

One of the key challenges remains opening a bank account for a crypto company in Poland. Banks require transparency, confirmation of funds’ sources, insurance presence, and a clear strategy for financial sustainability. The introduction of DORA and the AI Act strengthens cybersecurity requirements for crypto companies: data protection, digital resilience, regular IT system audits are mandatory.
The solution developed by COREDO for one of its clients included integrating specialized IT solutions for transaction monitoring and automatic reporting generation for KNF, which not only accelerated the account opening process but also increased banks’ trust.

Personnel and Internal Audit: Management Structure

MiCA requires that key managers and beneficiaries undergo fit and proper checks, verifying compliance with professional and reputational standards. Internal auditing in crypto companies becomes a mandatory element: regular process checks, reputation risk management, and implementation of internal control policies.

COREDO’s experience showed: companies that invested in staff training and the development of internal control systems were not only faster at getting licensed but also reduced the likelihood of future regulatory claims.

Crypto License in Poland: New Rules

Illustration for the section "Crypto License in Poland: New Rules" in the article "Crypto License in Poland - How MiCA Changed the Rules"

Obtaining a crypto license in Poland is now a multi-step process requiring thorough preparation and strategic planning. The KNF Poland financial supervision controls each stage, and the application submission and review timelines are strictly regulated.

Application Submission Stages

The MiCA transition period in Poland provides a “window” for submitting applications: companies already operating in the market must submit a complete package of documents within 18 months of MiCA’s entry into force. New players must go through preliminary notification and get KNF approval before starting operations.

In practice, COREDO recommends preparing documents in advance: preliminary expert assessment, business process audit, and compliance due diligence significantly reduce application review time.

Documents for Application Submission

The standard package of documents includes:

  • Business plan with financial forecasts and AML/KYC strategy.
  • Confirmation of capital sources (only own funds, minimum €50,000 for CASP).
  • Internal control policies, criminal record certificates, confirmation of key employees’ qualifications.
  • Description of IT infrastructure, cybersecurity, and data protection measures.
In one of COREDO’s cases for a client in the NFT marketplace sphere, a unique set of documents was developed taking into account the specifics of working with digital assets, which allowed them to go through licensing on the first try.

Challenges for Crypto Companies in Poland Post-MiCA

Illustration for the section "Challenges for Crypto Companies in Poland Post-MiCA" in the article "Crypto License in Poland - How MiCA Changed the Rules"

Cryptocurrency regulation in the EU is becoming increasingly complex, and the liability for non-compliance with MiCA is at an all-time high. Key challenges include adapting AML procedures, managing tax and reputational risks, and ensuring transparency and resilience of the business model.

Typical Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

The most frequent mistakes encountered by COREDO’s team:

  • Underestimation of compliance requirements: a formal approach to AML/KYC leads to refusals and fines.
  • Lack of internal audit and regular checks.
  • Incomplete document package or personnel qualification mismatch.

Recommendation: conduct regular internal audits, implement due diligence at all stages, and use automated transaction control systems.

Risks for Management and Their Responsibility

MiCA increases the responsibility of managers: non-compliance with standards threatens not only fines but also license revocation, inclusion on sanction lists, and account blocking. Managing reputational risks and building an internal control system become critically important.
In one of COREDO’s cases for a large custody service, an internal control system with multi-level reporting was implemented, minimizing regulatory risks and increasing partners’ trust.

Licensing and Scaling Crypto Business in the EU

Illustration for the section "Licensing and Scaling Crypto Business in the EU" in the article "Crypto License in Poland - How MiCA Changed the Rules"

The legalization of crypto activities and the strategies for scaling crypto business in the EU require a comprehensive approach: from document preparation to building relationships with banks and implementing best practices of MiCA.

Preparation for CASP License in the EU

Effective preparation includes:

  • Development and implementation of compliance documentation in line with EU standards.
  • Training personnel on new requirements and ongoing professional development.
  • Implementing IT solutions to automate transaction monitoring and reporting.
COREDO’s practice showed that integrating specialized compliance platforms not only accelerates the licensing process but also reduces operational costs.

How to Increase Transparency and Customer Trust

Financial transparency and internal auditing of crypto companies are key to gaining trust from clients and partners. Implementation of transaction control mechanisms, regular reporting, and reputation management are mandatory elements of a modern business model.

In one of COREDO’s projects for a DAO, a transparent reporting system was implemented, attracting institutional investors and increasing the company’s investment attractiveness.

AI and Cybersecurity for MiCA

Implementing the AI Act and DORA requires integrating cybersecurity solutions: data protection, digital resilience, regular IT system testing.

For a COREDO client in the gamification field, a project was implemented to integrate AI modules for assessing transactional risks, allowing adherence to new MiCA standards and improving resilience to cyber threats.

Key Advice for Entrepreneurs

Criterion Before MiCA (national law) After MiCA (EU unified standards)
Regulatory Authority KNF (Poland) KNF (considering MiCA, EU passporting)
Capital Requirements Flexible €50,000+ for CASP, only own funds
AML/KYC National standards EU unified standards, enhanced control
Passporting No Yes, throughout the EU
Liability Limited Enhanced, including fines and license revocation
Compliance Minimal Mandatory internal audit, DORA, AI Act, etc.

Checklist for Preparing for Licensing:

  • Conduct an audit of current AML/KYC procedures.
  • Prepare and approve a business plan considering MiCA.
  • Ensure IT infrastructure compliance with DORA and AI Act requirements.
  • Verify the qualification and reputation of key employees.
  • Implement internal audit and regular reporting.
  • Prepare a document package for submission to KNF.

Actionable advice:

  • Choose jurisdiction considering strategic goals and European passporting possibilities.
  • Optimize business processes for new MiCA standards.
  • Invest in staff training and compliance automation.
  • Use COREDO’s experience to minimize risks and speed up the licensing process.

To gain maximum benefits from the implementation of new MiCA rules, familiarize yourself in advance with typical questions and features of obtaining a crypto license in Poland.

MiCA and Crypto License in Poland, FAQ

Illustration for the section "MiCA and Crypto License in Poland, FAQ" in the article "Crypto License in Poland - How MiCA Changed the Rules"
How to get a crypto license in Poland after MiCA’s implementation?

A full document package is required, undergo due diligence, implement AML/KYC standards, and submit an application to KNF. MiCA’s transition period allows existing companies to adapt within 18 months.

What requirements does MiCA impose on crypto companies in 2025?

Unified AML/KYC standards, minimum capital of €50,000, internal audits, compliance with DORA and AI Act, and a transparent management structure.

How does MiCA affect AML/KYC processes for crypto business in Poland?

Stricter requirements for customer identification, transaction monitoring, reporting on suspicious transactions, and sanctions list checks.

How to prepare a company for CASP licensing in the EU?

Conduct process audits, implement new AML/KYC policies, automate transaction control, train staff, and prepare a document package for KNF.

How to open a bank account for a crypto company in Poland?

Full compliance with new MiCA standards, capital structure transparency, confirmation of funds’ sources, and cybersecurity measures are required.

MiCA and Entering the European Market for Crypto Business

MiCA regulation transforms not only the legal and compliance environment but also the very strategy of entering the European market for crypto companies. Registering a crypto business in Europe now requires not just adherence to formal procedures, but building a sustainable, transparent, and scalable business model. Legalization of crypto activities becomes the foundation for attracting investments, increasing competitiveness, and long-term development.

COREDO’s practice shows: companies that adapt to new standards in time, invest in compliance and internal control, not only successfully go through licensing but also become market leaders. If your goal is not just to survive in the MiCA era but to use new opportunities for growth, a strategic approach and the support of COREDO experts will help achieve this task most effectively.

In 2025, over 60% of new international companies in the MENA region choose the UAE as their launchpad – and it’s no accident. Over the past five years, the UAE has entered the top 10 global jurisdictions for ease of doing business and investment protection, with the total volume of foreign direct investment exceeding $23 billion last year. But behind this success lies not only attractive taxation: today, business registration in the UAE is a strategic tool for international trade, tax optimization, and entry into the markets of Asia, Europe, and Africa.

However, behind the outward simplicity lies a whole layer of legal, compliance, and banking nuances that can become either a growth point or a source of serious risks. Why do some companies scale and attract venture investments through Hub71 or DIFC FinTech Hive, while others face account blockages or license refusals? How to choose between mainland and free zone to retain control over your business and ensure AML compliance?

In this article, I, Nikita Veremeev, share practical strategies and experience from COREDO on registering and supporting businesses in the UAE. If you want not just to open a company, but to create a protected, scalable, and compliant structure, read to the end. Here you will find answers to questions not discussed in open sources, as well as checklists and recommendations tested in practice.

Opening a Company in the UAE for Business

Illustration for the section "Opening a Company in the UAE for Business" in the article "Challenges and Advantages of Opening a Company in the UAE"

Opening a company in the UAE: it’s not just registering a legal entity, but a strategic decision affecting tax efficiency, access to capital, and scaling opportunities. COREDO’s experience confirms: the right corporate structure in the UAE not only minimizes tax burden but also builds a flexible model for international trade and investment.

Thus, the creation and competent structuring of a business in the UAE requires consideration of new tax realities and related benefits: more on the current corporate taxes and applicable benefits in 2025 will be discussed later.

Corporate Taxes and Benefits in the UAE 2025

Since 2023, the UAE has implemented a 9% corporate tax for companies with profit exceeding 375,000 AED – one of the lowest in the world among developed jurisdictions. Up to this threshold, a 0% rate applies, making the UAE extremely attractive for startups and small businesses. For international holdings and trading structures, the ability to tax plan through double taxation avoidance agreements, of which the UAE has over 130, is crucial.

VAT stands at 5%. On the other hand, many free zones provide benefits or exemptions for export-oriented companies. It’s important to consider the requirements for tax residency in the UAE: to obtain status, a company must have a real office, employees, and demonstrate economic substance.

COREDO’s practice shows that ignoring these requirements leads to the risk of losing benefits and fines.

Free Economic Zones and Mainland: Comparison

Choosing between free zone and mainland: a key stage of strategic planning. Free economic zones (more than 45 of them) offer 100% foreign ownership, quick startup, and minimal office requirements. This is optimal for e-commerce, IT companies, international trade, and startups targeting export. Mainland is suitable for those planning to work with the UAE market, participate in government tenders, and build offline infrastructure.

Criterion Free Zone Mainland
Foreign Ownership Up to 100% Up to 100% (since 2021)
Corporate Tax 0% or 9% 9% (above 375,000 AED)
Operations within UAE Restricted No restrictions
Licenses Specialized Universal
bank account opening Easier More difficult
Office Requirements Flexible Stricter
Currency Control Minimal Almost absent
A solution developed at COREDO often includes a hybrid structure: a holding company in a free zone and an operational branch in the mainland. This approach allows optimizing taxes and expanding business without restrictions.

Innovative Ecosystems and Venture Capital

UAE: one of the few markets where the state actively supports startups and tech companies through business incubators and accelerators like Hub71, In5, DIFC FinTech Hive. Venture investments in the UAE annually exceed $1 billion, and participation in accelerators opens access to international partners and grants.

The COREDO team has implemented projects for the registration of IT companies and fintech startups, which, thanks to proper licensing and support, received investments from ADGM and DIFC funds. For e-commerce and SaaS platforms, free zones offer special licenses and tax incentives, accelerating business scaling through the UAE into Asian and European markets.

Business Registration in the UAE: Challenges

Illustration for the section "Business Registration in the UAE: Challenges" in the article "Challenges and Advantages of Opening a Company in the UAE"

Despite the apparent advantages, opening a business in the UAE comes with a number of challenges that are often underestimated by foreign founders. Our experience at COREDO showed: success depends not only on the choice of jurisdiction but also on strict compliance with compliance procedures, structure transparency, and skilled risk management.

Restrictions on Foreign Ownership: What Business Forms to Choose

Although 100% foreign ownership has been allowed in most sectors since 2021, certain industries (e.g., strategic or related to national security) still require local partner participation. It is important to consider corporate governance requirements, the appointment of a secretary, the disclosure of beneficial owners, and the minimum authorized capital (from 0 to 50,000 AED depending on the license).

COREDO’s practice confirms: errors at the structuring stage (e.g., choosing the wrong free zone or ignoring office requirements) can result in license blockage or the inability to open a bank account.

AML, KYC, and Compliance: How to Avoid Fines

The UAE has integrated international standards in AML/KYC and is actively implementing automatic tax information exchange (CRS, FATCA). Compliance procedures include mandatory due diligence of founders, verification of sources of funds, disclosure of beneficiaries, and economic substance. Special attention is given to CbCR (Country-by-Country Reporting) for international groups.

A solution developed at COREDO includes a preliminary audit of the client’s structure, preparation of KYC files, and support at all stages of verification. This minimizes the risk of license refusal or account blockage due to non-compliance with AML requirements.

Opening an Account for a Company in the UAE

Bank compliance in the UAE has become one of the strictest in the region: banks require a transparent structure, confirmation of economic substance, disclosure of ultimate beneficiaries, and a business plan. The time to open an account ranges from 2 to 12 weeks, and the likelihood of refusal for companies with opaque structures exceeds 50%.

COREDO’s team accompanies clients at all stages: from preparing the document package to selecting a bank considering the specifics of the business (IT, e-commerce, trade, fintech). It is important to work out currency control, asset protection, and reputational risks in advance.

Business Registration in the UAE for Non-residents

Illustration for the section "Business Registration in the UAE for Non-residents" in the article "Challenges and Advantages of Opening a Company in the UAE"

The registration of a company in the UAE for a foreign founder is a step-by-step process requiring strategic planning and precise adherence to procedures. Below is a step-by-step algorithm that COREDO uses when working with international clients.

Choosing Jurisdiction and Corporate Structure

The first step is determining the target market (local or international), analyzing the benefits of mainland and free zone, as well as the possibility of creating an offshore UAE company for holding or investment purposes. It is essential to consider corporate governance requirements, office presence, number of directors, and corporate secretarial support.

How to Obtain a License and Register Statutory Documents

Next, select the corporate license (IT, e-commerce, trade, fintech, etc.), prepare statutory documents, determine authorized capital (from 0 to 50,000 AED), and collect documents for regulator submission. For some licenses, prior approval from relevant authorities is required.

Opening an Account and Passing AML/KYC

After obtaining a license, go through compliance procedures: prepare KYC profiles of founders, disclose sources of funds, and conduct due diligence. Only then does the bank consider the application for account opening. It’s important to prepare a business plan, office lease, and confirmation of economic substance in advance.

Registration of an IT Company in the UAE

Registering an IT company in the UAE requires choosing a free zone with a suitable infrastructure (e.g., Dubai Internet City, In5, Hub71). For e-commerce, there are special licenses allowing international payments and protecting intellectual property. COREDO’s practice shows: a well-chosen zone and license accelerate market entry and reduce compliance costs.

Corporate Reporting and Audit: Requirements

Illustration for the section "Corporate Reporting and Audit: Requirements" in the article "Challenges and Advantages of Opening a Company in the UAE"

Since 2023, UAE has tightened requirements for corporate reporting and audit. All companies in the mainland and most free zones are required to maintain international reporting, undergo annual audits, and confirm economic substance (economic substance requirements). For international groups, CbCR reporting is mandatory.

COREDO supports clients at all stages: from auditor selection to implementation of internal control systems and ESG compliance. Failure to meet requirements threatens fines and loss of tax benefits.

Legal Support for Business in the UAE

Illustration for the section "Legal Support for Business in the UAE" in the article "Challenges and Advantages of Opening a Company in the UAE"

Legal support in the UAE is not only company registration but also continuous monitoring of legislative changes, corporate risk management, and intellectual property protection.

Internal Control in Corporate Governance

Effective corporate governance in the UAE is built on the transparency of structure, regular updates of corporate documents, implementation of compliance procedures, and internal control. Corporate secretarial support and ESG factors are becoming mandatory for companies targeting international markets and attracting investments.

Protection of Intellectual Property and Assets

Intellectual property protection in the UAE requires timely registration of trademarks, patents, and copyrights, as well as the implementation of data protection and cybersecurity mechanisms. For cross-border transactions and international payments, COREDO develops strategies to minimize currency and reputational risks.

Business through UAE: Entry into New Markets

The UAE is not only an optimal jurisdiction for business registration but also a strategic hub for scaling into the markets of Asia, Europe, and Africa. International trade through the UAE is facilitated by free trade agreements, developed banking infrastructure, and support for strategic alliances.

COREDO’s experience shows: opening a branch in the UAE, business migration, and employee relocation allow rapid adaptation to new markets and reduce regulatory barriers. Strategic planning for entering new markets is built on an analysis of tax, legal, and operational risks.

Practical Tips for Entrepreneurs

Checklist for Business Registration in the UAE:

  • Determine the target market and suitable jurisdiction (Free Zone/Mainland)
  • Conduct preliminary due diligence and prepare statutory documents
  • Obtain the necessary license (IT, e-commerce, trade, etc.)
  • Complete AML/KYC procedures and open a corporate bank account
  • Set up internal control and corporate governance systems
  • Ensure compliance with economic substance and reporting requirements
  • Protect intellectual property and assets
  • Develop a strategy for scaling into international markets

Mistakes to Avoid:

  • Ignoring economic substance and corporate reporting requirements
  • Choosing an unsuitable free zone or license without considering business specifics
  • Underestimating the complexity of banking compliance and AML/KYC procedures
  • Lack of asset and intellectual property protection strategy

Practical Advice:

  • For IT and e-commerce, choose free zones with developed infrastructure and startup support
  • For trading in the domestic market: consider mainland with a universal license
  • Implement internal compliance and ESG procedures from day one of operation
  • Engage professional partners to handle complex procedures

Questions about Opening a Company in the UAE

How to open a company in the UAE for a foreign founder?
Step-by-step: choose jurisdiction (mainland or free zone), prepare statutory documents, obtain a license, complete AML/KYC procedures, open a bank account, set up corporate governance.
What taxes does a company pay in the UAE in 2025?
Corporate tax, 0% up to 375,000 AED profit, thereafter: 9%. VAT (VAT) – 5%. It is important to comply with economic substance and reporting requirements.
How to ensure AML compliance when opening a business in the UAE?
It is necessary to prepare KYC profiles of founders, disclose sources of funds, complete due diligence, and comply with international AML/KYC standards.
What are the reporting and audit requirements for companies in different zones of the UAE?
In mainland and most free zones – mandatory international reporting, annual audit, economic substance confirmation, CbCR for groups.
How to choose the optimal corporate structure for business in the UAE?
Depending on business goals: for international trade and IT: free zone; for working in the UAE market: mainland; for investments, UAE offshore company with a transparent structure and corporate governance.

My experience and COREDO’s practice show: success in the UAE is the result of precise planning, professional support, and constant monitoring of legislative changes. If you are looking for not just registration, but strategic partnership and long-term protection of interests, COREDO’s team is ready to offer solutions tested by time and international practice.

On July 31, 2025, a date that will go down in the history of European fintech: the new MiCA regime (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) officially comes into force in the Czech Republic, completely changing the rules for crypto businesses, financial startups, and international companies. According to the European Commission, in 2024 the crypto-asset market in the EU exceeded €1.2 trillion, with almost 60% of entrepreneurs facing legal uncertainty or license denial risk due to non-compliance with new regulatory standards.

What does this mean for business? For the first time in history, Europe is gaining a unified, transparent, and strictly controlled regime for crypto services, with Czech Republic becoming one of the key platforms for scaling and entering EU markets. However, with opportunities come new challenges: tougher licensing requirements, comprehensive AML/KYC control, strict IT infrastructure standards, and serious penalties for violations.

Is your business ready for the transition to MiCA regulation? What strategic decisions will help not only survive but also take a leading position in the new reality? In this article, I, Nikita Veremeev, share practical experiences from COREDO, highlight key nuances of the Czech Digital Finance Act, delve into the process of obtaining a CASP license, and offer step-by-step recommendations for entrepreneurs not ready to risk their future. Read to the end, and you’ll receive not only an analytical breakdown but also tools for real success in the era of MiCA Czech Republic 2025.

MiCA and Digital Finance Act: Changes in Czechia 2025

Illustration for the section "MiCA and Digital Finance Act: Changes in Czechia 2025" in the article "31.07.2025, a new crypto regime - MiCA - introduced in Czechia - exploring"
MiCA and the Digital Finance Act in 2025 inaugurate a new phase of regulation in the digital finance and crypto-assets market for Czechia. These changes unify the requirements for all market participants and introduce unified rules, which both existing companies and new market players need to prepare for.

MiCA and Czech Legislation: Key Requirements

The MiCA regulation is not just another directive but a full-fledged law integrated into Czech law through the Digital Finance Act (Act No. 31/2025 Coll.). The main aim of the reform is to create unified standards for crypto-business, ensure transparency, protect investors, and integrate national regulation into the overall EU system.

The Czech National Bank (ČNB) has received expanded powers to oversee Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASP), as well as the activities of crypto exchanges, investment platforms, and token issuers. Now the criteria for market access, financial monitoring, and capital requirements have become unified for all EU countries, paving the way for a pan-European license and passporting – the right to provide crypto services across Europe without the need for repeated licensing in each state.

COREDO’s practice confirms: integrating MiCA into Czech legislation requires not only legal expertise but also a deep understanding of the local market specifics. For example, when registering a company in Czechia to obtain a CASP license, it’s important to consider both MiCA requirements and national nuances in financial monitoring and internal control.

Crypto-Assets and Services under MiCA

MiCA covers a wide range of crypto-assets and services, including:

  • asset-referenced tokens (ARTs), tokens backed by a basket of assets (for example, stablecoins linked to multiple currencies or commodities);
  • e-money tokens (EMTs), tokens equivalent to electronic money (for example, stablecoins pegged to a single currency);
  • utility tokens, tokens providing access to digital products or services;
  • services for storage, exchange, portfolio management, placement, and trading of crypto-assets (CASP/VASP).
For token issuers and crypto exchange operators, MiCA introduces new requirements for information disclosure, reserve requirements, and internal control procedures. COREDO developed a solution for one client, an international investment platform, which not only enabled them to navigate licensing in Czechia but also optimize the tokenization of assets considering new standards.

What MiCA Does Not Regulate: List of Exceptions

MiCA does not apply to:

  • security tokens subject to MiFID II;
  • NFTs that are not mass or not used as a means of payment;
  • reverse solicitation – where the client initiates contact with the provider independently;
  • internal tokens used exclusively within closed ecosystems.
These exceptions allow for flexible business models but require thorough legal expertise to minimize regulatory risks. COREDO’s experience shows that proper qualification of tokens and services during business model design is key to successful licensing and reducing operational costs.

CASP License in Czechia: New Requirements 2025

Illustration for the section "CASP License in Czechia: New Requirements 2025" in the article "31.07.2025, a new crypto regime - MiCA - introduced in Czechia - exploring"
CASP License in Czechia: New Requirements 2025 responds to the tightening of European regulatory standards for the cryptocurrency market and the implementation of MiCA. In the near future, obtaining or renewing a CASP license will only be possible by meeting updated requirements regarding the company’s structure, making the authorization process more stringent and formalized.

How to Obtain a CASP License under MiCA

obtaining a CASP license in Czechia under MiCA is a structured process that the COREDO team has implemented for dozens of clients from the EU, Asia, and CIS. Main stages include:

  1. registration of a legal entity in Czechia, considering requirements for corporate structure and transparency of beneficiaries.
  2. Preparation of the documentation package: business plan, internal policies, AML/KYC procedures, IT infrastructure description, confirmation of capital sources.
  3. Contribution of the minimum statutory capital (amount depends on the license class and spectrum of services provided).
  4. Application to the ČNB and passing a preliminary audit for MiCA regulation compliance.
  5. Obtaining the CASP license and activation of passporting for access to EU markets.
COREDO’s practice has shown that meticulous preparation for each stage can reduce licensing times to 3–6 months and minimize the risk of denial.

Requirements for CASP IT Infrastructure

MiCA imposes special requirements on CASP IT infrastructure: the system must ensure cybersecurity, incident resilience, regular data backup, and fast recovery of operations. Internal control systems should include:

  • automated transaction monitoring;
  • procedures for identifying suspicious operations;
  • regular reporting and audit.
COREDO’s solution for one fintech startup included implementing a modular IT platform integrating AML/KYC and internal control automation tools, allowing not only compliance with MiCA requirements but also improving business operational efficiency.

Costs and Types of CASP Licenses

The cost of a CASP license in Czechia depends on the chosen class (e.g., asset custody, exchange, portfolio management). On average, minimum capital starts at €125,000 for basic operations and reaches €350,000–€750,000 for complex services (e.g., work with EMT/ART).
CASP License Class Minimum Capital Main Services Acquisition Time
Basic €125,000 Exchange, custody 3–4 mo.
Advanced €350,000 Portfolio management, trading 4–6 mo.
Full €750,000 EMT/ART issuance, investment services 6–8 mo.
In addition to capital, reserve requirements, liability insurance, and regular reporting to ČNB are mandatory.

MiCA Transitional Period for CASP in Czechia

Illustration for the section "MiCA Transitional Period for CASP in Czechia" in the article "31.07.2025, a new crypto regime - MiCA - introduced in Czechia - exploring"
The MiCA transitional period for CASP in Czechia introduces new rules and strict deadlines for all crypto businesses operating in the country. Understanding these requirements in this regulation and how to properly prepare for the transition to a new CASP license is crucial to ensuring seamless operations.

Transition to MiCA: How to Prepare Your Business

The MiCA transitional period: is a unique window of opportunity for existing CASPs and new players. Until October 31, 2025, companies already providing crypto services in Czechia can use grandfathering (transition provisions) to adapt business models without the risk of operational disruption.
COREDO’s experience shows: effective preparation includes auditing current processes, developing a compliance strategy, updating internal policies, and training personnel in new MiCA regulations.

What is Grandfathering and How to Apply It?

To minimize operational risks and costs during the transition period, I recommend:

  • Conducting a gap analysis of current procedures’ compliance with MiCA standards;
  • Implementing automated monitoring and reporting tools;
  • Using transition provisions for phased migration of the business model;
  • Pre-agreeing with ČNB on the plan for adapting IT infrastructure and internal policies.
In one of COREDO’s cases for an international crypto exchange, grandfathering preserved the client base and ensured a seamless transition to new standards without losing the license.

Transition for Startups and Small Businesses: Key Points

MiCA for startups and small enterprises opens up new opportunities but demands flexibility and quick adaptation. For fintech startups, the COREDO team recommends:
  • Using modular solutions for AML/KYC and internal control;
  • Engaging external experts for speedy compliance procedure implementation;
  • Building scalable IT infrastructure considering future passporting.
COREDO’s comprehensive support allows startups not only to undergo licensing but also to quickly scale the business under new MiCA regulation requirements.

Risks and Sanctions MiCA in Czechia

Illustration for the section "Risks and Sanctions MiCA in Czechia" in the article "31.07.2025, a new crypto regime - MiCA - introduced in Czechia - exploring"
Risks and Sanctions MiCA in Czechia become a key issue for all participants in the crypto market. Non-compliance with these regulatory requirements can lead to significant fines, activity restrictions, and inclusion in high-risk entity registries. Below we will examine specific risks for crypto businesses in the context of MiCA.

Non-Compliance Risks of MiCA for Crypto Business

Non-compliance with MiCA entails severe consequences: fines of up to 5% of annual turnover, license revocation, and EU market access restrictions. Administrative liability extends not only to the company but also to management, who bear personal responsibility for internal control and information disclosure.
COREDO’s practice confirms: key risks include insufficient preparation for new standards, errors in AML/KYC processes, and untimely reporting to ČNB.

Business Executive Duties 2025

With MiCA’s introduction, executives and owners of CASPs must:

  • Ensure transparency of the corporate structure;
  • Implement regular audits and risk information disclosure;
  • Control the compliance of crypto services advertising with new standards;
  • Timely update internal policies and procedures.
The COREDO team regularly conducts training and audits for clients, helping minimize risks and avoid sanctions.

Investor and Consumer Rights

MiCA and the Czech Digital Finance Act introduce strict requirements for investor rights protection: mandatory information disclosure, reserve requirements, compensation funds for consumer protection. For COREDO clients, this means not only a reduction in regulatory risks but also increased trust from partners and investors.

MiCA and AML for Crypto Business

Illustration for the section "MiCA and AML for Crypto Business" in the article "31.07.2025, a new crypto regime - MiCA - introduced in Czechia - exploring"
The MiCA law and AML requirements become key guidelines for crypto businesses in the European market. Modern regulations not only set new rules of the game but also significantly influence AML/KYC practices, especially in jurisdictions like Czechia.

Impact of MiCA on AML/KYC in Czechia

MiCA regulation tightens AML/KYC requirements: all CASPs are obliged to implement automated procedures for client identification, transaction monitoring, and financial monitoring. Czech anti-money laundering legislation is integrated with European standards, requiring businesses to regularly update internal policies and train staff.
COREDO’s experience showed: implementing comprehensive AML/KYC solutions not only meets MiCA requirements but also enhances risk management efficiency.

Implementing AML Policies: Practical Advice

For successful adaptation to new standards, I recommend:

  • Using specialized AML systems with CASP IT infrastructure integration capabilities;
  • Regularly updating internal control procedures;
  • Conducting independent audits of AML/KYC processes.
COREDO’s solution for one client included implementing a unified platform for monitoring all operations, reducing operational risks, and enhancing financial transparency.

AML for Cross-Border and DeFi Operations

MiCA for the first time introduces AML/KYC requirements for cross-border services and DeFi operations. Passporting allows CASPs to provide services across the EU but requires compliance with each jurisdiction’s standards. For DeFi operations, it’s crucial to ensure the transparency of smart contracts and participant identification.

The COREDO team has developed a risk assessment methodology for cross-border activities, allowing clients to effectively scale their businesses without breaching MiCA regulation requirements.
Thus, skillful MiCA implementation provides companies with significant advantages while simultaneously setting new governance and oversight requirements, which is especially important for assessing compliance prospects and risks.

Opportunities and Risks of MiCA for Business

Opportunities and risks of MiCA for business become key factors for all companies wishing to work with crypto-assets in the EU. The new regulation opens the market but simultaneously sets strict licensing and operational requirements, necessitating careful preparation for passporting and licensing.

Passporting and Licensing for Entering the EU Market

MiCA opens up strategic scaling opportunities: obtaining a pan-European CASP license and using passporting enables the provision of crypto services in all EU countries without the need for repeated licensing. For international companies, this means reduced costs, accelerated market entry, and access to new investment opportunities.
The solution implemented by the COREDO team for one client allowed them to enter the markets of five EU countries within six months, leveraging the advantages of passporting and a single license.

MiCA and Tokenization: What Changes for Platforms

MiCA regulation stimulates the development of investment platforms and asset tokenization, setting transparent rules for utility tokens, ARTs, and EMTs. For businesses, this offers new opportunities for raising capital, entering international markets, and implementing innovative business models.

COREDO’s practice shows: proper token structuring and compliance with MiCA standards not only secure a license but also enhance the project’s attractiveness for investors.

Opportunities for Fintech Startups and Businesses

MiCA for startups is a chance to quickly scale the business, using unified standards and passporting. For international companies, new markets open up, as do opportunities for business model migration and integration with the European financial ecosystem.

The COREDO team accompanies clients at all stages: from choosing a jurisdiction and company registration to implementing IT solutions and preparing for MiCA licensing.

Business: Conclusions and Recommendations

Practical Steps for Preparing for MiCA Errors to Avoid ROI Metrics for MiCA Compliance Implementation
Conduct an audit of the business model and processes Ignoring the transition period Reduction in time to market
Develop a compliance strategy Underestimation of IT requirements Increase in market reach
Implement automated AML/KYC Lack of internal control Reduction in regulatory risks
Prepare a document package for ČNB Errors in information disclosure Increased investor trust
Use grandfathering for adaptation Untimely policy updates Savings in licensing
For legal support and consultation on implementing MiCA regulation, contact COREDO experts – we are ready to offer solutions for any task.
Before moving to the FAQ section, we have gathered key points for gradual preparation and successful implementation of MiCA compliance in your business.

Entrepreneur Questions, FAQ

**What strategic advantages does the CASP license under MiCA provide?**: Unified pan-European license, possibility of passporting, access to markets of all EU countries, reduced regulatory barriers.
**What sanctions are provided for MiCA violations?**: Fines up to 5% of annual turnover, license revocation, market access blockage, administrative liability of executives.
**How does MiCA affect market entry timelines and costs?**

  • Licensing timelines, 3–8 months, cost depends on CASP class and service volume; unified standards allow for faster business model adaptation.
**What is grandfathering for CASP in Czechia?**: Transition provisions allowing existing companies to adapt to new MiCA standards without the risk of losing their licenses.
**What requirements does MiCA impose on CASP IT infrastructure?**

  • Cybersecurity, incident resilience, monitoring automation, regular data backup, integration with AML/KYC systems.

Consequences of MiCA for the Czech Market

The implementation of MiCA regulation and the Czech Digital Finance Act is not just a new chapter in crypto-asset regulation but a fundamental transformation of the investment climate and business environment. For companies ready to invest in compliance, IT infrastructure, and internal control procedure development, unique opportunities for scaling, capital attraction, and integration with European markets are opening up.
COREDO’s experience shows: strategic planning, timely business model adaptation, and professional support not only minimize regulatory risks but also allow businesses to become leaders in the new, dynamically developing crypto service market in Europe.
In 2024, more than 60% of European crypto startups faced delays in licensing due to tightened MiCA requirements and more complex AML procedures. At the same time, according to international research, Georgia entered the top 10 countries in terms of the growth rate of registered companies in the field of digital assets, surpassing several EU and Asian jurisdictions.
Why are entrepreneurs focused on Web3 and digital finance increasingly considering Georgia as an alternative jurisdiction for crypto business and company registration instead of MiCA?

In recent years, the team at COREDO has implemented dozens of projects for the registration of legal entities and obtaining licenses for crypto business in the EU, the UK, Singapore, and Dubai. However, Georgia has become a magnet for clients seeking a balance between regulatory flexibility, speed of launch, and availability of banking tools. Strategic planning for Web3 companies today is unimaginable without analyzing MiCA alternatives: and Georgia confidently occupies a special place in this regard.

If you are wondering how to quickly and legally enter the international market, minimize compliance risks, and obtain banking services for digital assets, this article will provide you with a structured guide and practical recommendations. I will explain how COREDO’s experience allows for finding optimal solutions for registering a business in the EU vs Georgia, what advantages and limitations await crypto companies, and how to choose a strategy that is resilient to regulatory changes.

Georgia Registration and Licensing for Crypto Companies

Illustration to the section "Georgia Registration and Licensing for Crypto Companies" in the article "Georgia as an Alternative Jurisdiction Instead of MiCA"
Georgia is one of the few jurisdictions where the procedure of registering legal entities and obtaining a crypto license takes 2 to 3 weeks, with minimal requirements for authorized capital and founders’ composition. This approach is especially in demand among entrepreneurs who need a fast start and flexible corporate structure for international business.

Registration of a Legal Entity and Crypto License in Georgia

COREDO’s practice confirms: registering a cryptocurrency company in Georgia in 2025 will require a minimal package of documents, a charter, information on beneficiaries (UBO), proof of address, and identification of founders. After submitting documents to the National Agency of Public Registry, registration takes 1-2 working days. The next stage: preparation for licensing, where key importance is given to due diligence for crypto business and legal transparency of the structure.

  • Proof of funds sources and identification of beneficiaries (UBO)
  • Description of the business model and internal AML/KYC procedures
  • Coordination with the regulator (National Bank of Georgia or Securities Commission)
  • Opening a corporate account in a Georgian bank

The solution developed at COREDO allows clients to prepare all documents in advance, minimize timelines, and undergo the licensing procedure without additional requests from the regulator.

Thus, a complete package and competent preliminary preparation of documents will serve as a reliable foundation for the further registration of the company in the Free Industrial Zone.

Registration in Free Industrial Zone for Crypto Business

Free Industrial Zone Georgia: a unique tool for tax optimization for companies in the digital asset sector. Registration in the free industrial zone (FIZ) provides zero corporate taxation, no VAT, and simplified foreign exchange control procedures. Our experience at COREDO has shown that this format is especially beneficial for structures with international shareholder capital and operations in multiple jurisdictions.

Key Advantages of FIZ for Crypto Business:

  • Full tax optimization and transparency for foreign investors
  • Opportunity to open brokerage and settlement accounts in leading Georgian banks
  • Flexible corporate structure for international business
On the other hand, it is important to consider: to enter EU markets, compliance with additional AML and KYC standards, as well as preparation of reports according to international standards, will be required.

AML and KYC for Crypto Business in Georgia

Illustration to the section "AML and KYC for Crypto Business in Georgia" in the article "Georgia as an Alternative Jurisdiction Instead of MiCA"

In 2025, Georgia implemented updated AML compliance and KYC requirements, oriented towards international financial monitoring standards (FATF, EU AMLD). This enables companies registered in Georgia to integrate with global payment systems and ensure investor protection in the crypto sector.

AML and KYC in Georgia – How to Meet Standards

COREDO clients often ask: how to ensure compliance with international AML standards when operating in Georgia? The solution is the implementation of automated compliance procedures, regular auditing of internal policies, and staff training. Best compliance practices for crypto companies in Georgia include:

  • Using international providers to check clients and transactions
  • Implementing customer onboarding procedures with mandatory identification of beneficiaries
  • Developing an internal financial monitoring policy for transactions
COREDO’s practice confirms: transparency and automation of compliance processes minimize compliance risks and accelerate integration with foreign banks and payment systems.

AML/KYC for Foreign Founders

Features of AML procedures for non-residents in Georgia include the requirement to provide an expanded package of documents confirming the origin of funds and ownership structure. Customer onboarding for foreign clients requires adapting procedures to international standards, as well as considering legal barriers for non-residents.

COREDO has implemented projects where the automation of KYC allowed reducing client verification times to 48 hours, which is especially important for companies with international shareholder capital.

Opening a Bank Account for Crypto Business in Georgia

Illustration to the section "Opening a Bank Account for Crypto Business in Georgia" in the article "Georgia as an Alternative Jurisdiction Instead of MiCA"
Georgia’s banking infrastructure is characterized by a high degree of digitalization while maintaining an individual approach to clients in the digital asset sector. Corporate services in Georgian banks are available both for residents and foreign companies, but they require thorough document preparation and compliance procedures.

Opening an Account for a Crypto Company

How to open a settlement account in a Georgian bank for crypto business? In COREDO’s practice, this process includes:

  • Preliminary due diligence of the company and founders
  • Preparation of a business plan and description of funds sources
  • Passing customer onboarding and KYC procedures of the bank
Among the banks that open accounts for foreign companies in the crypto asset sector, Bank of Georgia and TBC Bank stand out. Opening brokerage accounts is possible with a license and a transparent corporate structure.

Risks for Non-residents in Georgian Banks

Among the legal risks when choosing Georgia as a jurisdiction, the following stand out:

  • Possible requests for additional verification and disclosure of beneficiaries’ information
  • Restrictions on working with companies from sanctioned lists
  • The need for regular confirmation of the legality of operations for the bank’s compliance department
The solution implemented by COREDO involves preliminary auditing of the corporate structure and preparation for possible bank requests, minimizing legal barriers for non-residents.

Corporate Taxes and Benefits for Crypto Business in Georgia

Illustration to the section "Corporate Taxes and Benefits for Crypto Business in Georgia" in the article "Georgia as an Alternative Jurisdiction Instead of MiCA"
Georgia offers unique tax benefits for crypto business, including zero profit taxation for companies registered in FIZ and reduced rates for residents. Tax residency in Georgia for companies is processed within 1-2 months and allows the use of tax optimization tools for international settlements.

This makes Georgia one of the most attractive destinations for cryptocurrency companies and investors; now let’s consider the taxation specifics in EU countries.

Taxes for Crypto Business: Georgia and EU

Criterion EU (MiCA) Georgia (FIZ/standard)
Corporate tax 12-25% 0% (FIZ), 15% (standard)
VAT 18-22% 0% (FIZ), 18% (standard)
Dividend tax 5-15% 5% (standard), 0% (FIZ)
Tax benefits Limited Individual approach, FIZ

Comparing the licensing conditions of MiCA and Georgian legislation shows that Georgia provides more flexible tax regimes and transparent procedures for obtaining tax resident status.

MiCA or Georgian Laws for Crypto Business

In 2024-2025, MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) became the standard for comprehensive crypto asset regulation in the EU but simultaneously: a source of high regulatory burden and significant compliance costs. Georgian legislation, on the contrary, focuses on minimal interference and support for innovations.

Criterion MiCA (EU) Georgia
Type of regulation Strict, comprehensive Flexible, minimal interference
License requirements High, multi-step Simplified, fast process
AML/KYC European standards National norms, market adaptation
Registration period 2-6 months 2-3 weeks
Tax benefits Limited FIZ, low rates, individual approach
Account opening Challenging for non-residents More accessible, but with nuances
Long-term risks High regulatory burden Possible legislative changes

Georgia for Crypto Startups: Pros and Cons

Advantages:

  • Quick Registration of legal entities and obtaining a crypto license
  • Favorable tax regulation and access to FIZ
  • Flexible corporate structure and legal transparency
  • Opportunity for strategic planning for Web3 companies

Disadvantages:

  • The need to independently ensure compliance with international AML/KYC standards
  • Possible restrictions when entering EU markets due to regulatory differences
  • Risks of changes in national legislation in the next 2-3 years

Risks of Choosing Georgia Instead of MiCA

Choosing Georgia as an alternative to MiCA allows significantly reducing launch and business maintenance costs. However, it requires regular monitoring of legislative changes and constant improvement of compliance procedures. For scaling and entering EU markets, additional Licensing or the creation of subsidiary structures in the EU may be needed.

Legal Support for Business in Georgia

Illustration to the section "Legal Support for Business in Georgia" in the article "Georgia as an Alternative Jurisdiction Instead of MiCA"
Comprehensive legal support for business in Georgia includes not only registration and licensing but also support on financial reporting, auditing, and corporate governance in cross-border structures. COREDO’s practice shows: timely implementation of compliance automation processes and preparation for auditing are key to the long-term sustainability of a business.

Reporting and Audit Requirements for Companies

For crypto companies in Georgia, requirements are set for annual financial reporting according to international standards (IFRS), mandatory auditing for companies with foreign capital, and transparency in corporate governance. The audit of crypto company activities is conducted by independent auditors, ensuring trust among investors and partners.

Compliance Tools for Crypto Business in Georgia

Modern tools for automating compliance and monitoring allow:

  • Real-time financial transaction monitoring
  • Automating customer onboarding procedures and beneficiary identification
  • Reducing compliance risks through integration with international databases
Solutions implemented by the COREDO team allow clients to minimize compliance costs and increase the efficiency of corporate governance.

Georgia vs MiCA: How to Choose a Jurisdiction?

  • Define the strategic goals and scale of the business: for a quick start and flexible regulation, Georgia is the optimal choice.
  • Study the AML/KYC and corporate governance requirements, prepare internal policies, and regulations.
  • Consider registration in the Free Industrial Zone for tax optimization and access to international markets.
  • Prepare a complete set of documents for account opening and license acquisition in advance.
  • Implement compliance process automation and regularly update internal policies considering legislative changes.
  • Consult with COREDO experts to minimize legal risks and strategically plan entry into new markets.

Entrepreneur Questions Answered

Georgia company registration is a fast and transparent process, allowing crypto businesses to access international markets at minimal costs. MiCA’s alternative in the form of Georgian jurisdiction is suitable for companies focused on flexibility, speed, and an individual approach to taxation.

Legal business support in Georgia includes all stages: from registration to audit and compliance automation. Among the legal risks when choosing a jurisdiction are potential difficulties with integration into international payment systems and the need to comply with EU standards when scaling.

For registering a crypto business in Georgia, you will need:

  • Charter and beneficiary information
  • Proof of funds sources
  • Description of the business model and AML/KYC procedures
Difficulties may arise when integrating Georgian companies with international payment systems. Nonetheless, COREDO’s practice shows that competent preparation and support minimize these barriers.

Crypto Business in Georgia: Registration and Operations

Which banks in Georgia open accounts for foreign companies in the crypto asset sector?

Bank of Georgia, TBC Bank, and Liberty Bank provide corporate services for crypto businesses, subject to advanced due diligence and a transparent ownership structure.

What are the requirements for identifying beneficiaries in Georgia?

Beneficiary identification (UBO) is conducted according to international standards, with mandatory disclosure of the ownership structure, proof of funds sources, and completion of customer onboarding.

What are the features of customer onboarding for foreign clients?

Customer onboarding procedures require providing an expanded set of documents, including passports, proof of address, business information, and funds sources. For non-residents, additional requests from banks and regulators may be possible.

What advantages does the Free Industrial Zone offer for crypto business?

FIZ provides zero taxation, simplified currency operations, and a flexible corporate structure for international business.

How to minimize legal risks when registering a business in Georgia?

It is recommended to conduct a preliminary audit of the corporate structure, prepare internal AML/KYC policies, use compliance automation, and consult with international law experts.
COREDO’s experience proves: competent strategic planning, a deep understanding of international standards, and comprehensive support at all stages are the keys to a successful launch and development of crypto business in Georgia as an alternative jurisdiction instead of MiCA.

International anti-money laundering practices are built upon the understanding of three key stages: placement, layering, and integration. Each of these stages uses specific money laundering techniques, and schemes are becoming increasingly complex with technological advancement and heightened regulatory scrutiny.

Introduction of funds into the financial system – how does it work?

At this stage, illicit proceeds enter the legal financial circuit for the first time. Commonly used methods include:

  • Cash transactions: Depositing large sums through cash-intensive businesses (restaurants, car washes, pawnshops), breaking down amounts into small tranches (transaction structuring or smurfing), and depositing cash via ATMs and terminals.
  • Cash transportation: Courier delivery across borders, use of prepaid cards and anonymous payment tools.
COREDO’s practice confirms that it is crucial to implement systems for detecting suspicious transactions and cash operations control during the placement stage. In several cases, the COREDO team assisted clients from the EU and Singapore in establishing automated monitoring, which helped identify attempts to split large sums and prevent further involvement of funds in laundering schemes.

SEO Keywords: cash operations control, detection of suspicious transactions, cash transportation, cash-intensive businesses

Further actions for legalizing proceeds involve using multi-layered schemes – more about the layering stage in the next section.

Multi-layered schemes in Layering

In the second stage, layering: funds go through a series of complex operations to conceal their origin:

  • International transfers through offshore companies (shell companies): Using complex corporate structures, registering companies abroad in low-transparency jurisdictions, hiding beneficial owners.
  • Invoice fraud and trade financing: Creating fictitious contracts, inflating or deflating the value of goods and services, manipulating invoice fraud.
  • Transaction structuring (smurfing): Splitting large sums into multiple smaller transfers through different accounts and countries.
Solutions implemented by COREDO for clients in the Czech Republic and Cyprus included comprehensive financial monitoring, enabling tracking of layering schemes through anomaly analysis in transaction structures and automatic reconciliation of information about beneficial owners.

SEO Keywords: international money laundering schemes, financial monitoring, fund transfer through offshore companies, invoice fraud, trade financing, transaction structuring

What is the legalization of criminal proceeds?

At the integration stage, laundered funds return to the economy as legitimate income:

  • Real estate investments: Purchasing luxury residential and commercial real estate, often through front structures or affiliated persons.
  • Purchase of luxury items: Paintings, cars, antiques, jewelry.
  • Integration of funds into legitimate business: Financing startups, acquiring stakes in companies, issuing loans.
COREDO’s experience shows that at this stage, many international companies face corporate risks associated with the legalization of proceeds through real estate and luxury items. Implementing multi-level due diligence and real estate transaction analysis helps to identify and prevent such schemes.

SEO Keywords: legalization of proceeds through real estate, corporate risks, real estate investments, purchase of luxury items, integration of funds into legitimate business

Money Laundering Schemes in 2024–2025

Illustration for the section "Money Laundering Schemes in 2024–2025" in the article "The Most Popular Methods of Money Laundering"
Modern money laundering methods are becoming more technological and international. Over the past two years, the COREDO team has noted an increase in the use of digital currencies, trade financing, and legal schemes for fund withdrawal.

SEO Keywords: popular money laundering schemes, money laundering methods, financial crimes, anti-money laundering, AML, digital currencies and crypto-assets, trade financing, lawsuits as a tool for fund withdrawal, international payment systems, whistleblowing

Money laundering through trade

Trade-Based Money Laundering (TBML): one of the most difficult methods to detect. Essence: manipulating contracts, invoices, and the value of goods in international trade:
  • Invoice fraud: Inflating or deflating costs, fictitious deliveries, using layering to obscure traces.
  • Manipulation with contracts and goods: Discrepancy between actual and declared volumes, delivery of non-existent goods.
In one of COREDO’s cases, supporting a client from the EU, a TBML scheme was identified through the integration of automated invoice analysis and trade financing monitoring. This allowed preventing the legalization of a large sum through fictitious export operations.

SEO Keywords: money laundering through trade, invoice fraud, international schemes, layering, invoice fraud, trade financing, manipulation with contracts and goods

Offshore and shell companies – what is it?

Shell companies, a classic tool for hiding beneficiaries and complicating corporate structures. Registering companies abroad in offshore jurisdictions allows for creating ownership chains, making financial monitoring and control challenging.
  • Hidden beneficiaries: Using nominee directors, trust structures, corporate secretaries.
  • Registration in countries with low transparency: Cyprus, Belize, BVI, Estonia.
The COREDO team has implemented projects to disclose beneficial owners for clients from the UK and Singapore using international databases and KYC automation. This approach not only complies with regulatory requirements in the EU and Asia but also minimizes corporate risks.

SEO Keywords: use of shell companies, registration of companies abroad, corporate transparency, offshore jurisdictions, hidden beneficiaries, corporate structure

Money laundering through cryptocurrency: schemes

Since 2024, there has been a sharp increase in schemes related to money laundering through cryptocurrency:
  • Anonymous transactions: Using mixers, P2P platforms, crypto cards.
  • Cybercrime: Extortion, phishing, hacks followed by fund withdrawal through digital currencies.
  • Monitoring automation: Modern AML tools allow blockchain analysis and detection of suspicious transfer chains.
Solutions developed at COREDO include blockchain analytics implementation and automation of crypto operations monitoring for clients in Dubai and Singapore. This approach ensures early detection of suspicious transactions and reduces the risk of legal liability.

SEO Keywords: money laundering through cryptocurrency, digital currencies and crypto-assets, detection of suspicious transactions, crypto cards, anonymous transactions, cybercrime, monitoring automation

Cash operations and prepaid cards

Despite the development of digital technologies, cash operations and prepaid card schemes remain relevant:
  • Courier cash delivery: Cross-border transfers, division of sums.
  • Anonymous payment tools: Prepaid cards, e-wallets without identification.
COREDO’s experience shows that effective control of cash operations and limiting anonymous tools significantly reduces the risks of a company becoming involved in money laundering schemes.

SEO Keywords: cash operations control, prepaid card schemes, courier cash delivery, anonymous payment tools

Legalization of income through real estate

Real estate and luxury items remain a favorite way to integrate laundered funds:
  • Investment in luxury real estate: Often through offshore structures or front persons.
  • Purchase of art, cars, antiques: Complexity of valuation, high liquidity.
COREDO’s practice confirms that thorough due diligence and analysis of real estate transactions allow for identifying attempts to legalize criminal proceeds at early stages.

SEO Keywords: legalization of income through real estate, financial crimes, investment in luxury real estate, purchase of art, cars, antiques

Litigation schemes and fictitious lawsuits

In recent years, there has been an increase in the use of lawsuits as a tool for fund withdrawal:
  • Fictitious debts and court rulings: Creating artificial obligations, recovering funds under fraudulent contracts.
  • Legalization through court processes: Transferring funds based on foreign court decisions.
The COREDO team has supported investigations to identify such schemes in the EU, allowing to minimize risks for clients and ensuring legal protection of assets.

SEO Keywords: lawsuits as a tool for fund withdrawal, international money laundering schemes, fictitious debts, legalization through court decisions

Industries vulnerable to money laundering in the EU, Asia, and CIS

Illustration for the section "Industries vulnerable to money laundering in the EU, Asia, and CIS" in the article "The Most Popular Methods of Money Laundering"

Comprehensive analysis of corporate risks shows that no company operating in international markets is immune to involvement in money laundering schemes – particularly in industries with high cash turnover and complex payment structures.

SEO Keywords: corporate money laundering risks, business risks in the EU and Asia, anti-money laundering, industries with high cash turnover, registration of companies abroad, financial sanctions, EU and Asia regulatory requirements

Vulnerable industries and companies

  • Restaurants, car washes, pawnshops: High cash turnover, complexity of control.
  • Luxury goods trading: High value, low transparency of transactions.
  • Offshore structures: Use of shell companies to hide beneficiaries.
  • Charitable organizations: Weak control over funding sources.
The COREDO team regularly conducts due diligence for companies in these sectors, identifying corporate risks and developing individual AML strategies.

SEO Keywords: popular money laundering schemes, due diligence for companies, restaurants, car washes, pawnshops, luxury goods trading, offshore structures, charitable organizations

Regional differences and new challenges 2025

  • Regulatory sandboxes and digital client identification: Regulatory sandboxes and digital KYC tools are actively implemented in Asia and the EU.
  • International cooperation on AML: Strengthening information exchange between regulators, integrating OFAC and EU sanction lists.
  • Increased transparency requirements: New FATF standards and local regulatory requirements demand the disclosure of beneficiaries and automation of due diligence.
COREDO’s solutions for implementing AML policies in international business allow clients to effectively adapt to new challenges, minimizing risks and ensuring compliance with the requirements of different jurisdictions.

SEO Keywords: international money laundering schemes, implementation of AML policies in international business, regulatory sandboxes, digital client identification, international AML cooperation

AML technologies: how to detect money laundering

Illustration for the section "AML technologies: how to detect money laundering" in the article "The Most Popular Methods of Money Laundering"

The technological breakthrough of recent years has radically changed the approach to combating money laundering. Automation, artificial intelligence, and big data analytics are becoming key tools for effective AML.

SEO Keywords: AML, compliance and AML, financial monitoring, automation of AML processes, artificial intelligence in detecting suspicious operations, real-time transaction monitoring, digital client identification, internal AML audit, KYC, bank suspicious activity reports, due diligence automation

Transaction monitoring and fraud detection

  • Monitoring automation: Using algorithms for real-time transaction analysis, detecting anomalies and patterns characteristic of layering and smurfing schemes.
  • Risk management in AML: Assessing risks by countries, counterparties, industries.
  • Financial intelligence (FIU): Interaction with national and international bodies, filing SAR (Suspicious Activity Reports).
Solutions implemented by COREDO in Estonia and the UK allowed clients to automate the monitoring of suspicious operations, reducing the workload on compliance departments and improving the quality of financial control.

SEO Keywords: detection of suspicious transactions, control of financial flows, monitoring automation, risk management in AML, financial intelligence

KYC/AML for international companies

  • Digital client identification: Use of biometrics, electronic documents, global databases.
  • Integration of AML into business processes: Implementing KYC and compliance control at all stages of working with clients and counterparties.
  • Internal audit and control: Conducting regular checks, personnel training, due diligence automation.
COREDO’s experience shows that the integration of KYC/AML into business processes without losing efficiency is possible only through proper automation and clear regulation of procedures.

SEO Keywords: implementation of AML policies in international business, compliance control, digital client identification, integration of AML into business processes, internal audit and control

In the context of tightening regulatory requirements, automation becomes a key element of successful AML policy implementation in international business. Next, we will look at how modern solutions based on artificial intelligence and machine learning transform AML and compliance control processes.

AI and machine learning in AML

  • Financial flow analysis: AI systems detect anomalies, build client profiles, and predict risks.
  • Detection of complex schemes: Machine learning allows identifying new money laundering methods, including layering and smurfing.
  • Modern AML technologies: Use of cloud platforms, integration with international databases.
COREDO’s solutions for integrating AI into AML processes have already proven their effectiveness in practice: automation enabled clients to identify schemes that previously remained unnoticed even during manual checks.

SEO Keywords: artificial intelligence in detecting suspicious operations, automation of AML processes, financial flow analysis, anomaly detection, modern AML technologies

Liability for AML violations and sanctions

Illustration for the section "Liability for AML violations and sanctions" in the article "The Most Popular Methods of Money Laundering"

Violations of AML requirements lead not only to fines but also to criminal liability, account blocking, and inclusion in sanction lists.

SEO Keywords: legal AML support, corporate liability for AML violations, anti-money laundering, financial sanctions, sanction lists, EU and Asia regulatory requirements, lawsuits, whistleblowing, internal investigations

Responsibility and fines for companies

  • Criminal and administrative liability: In the EU and Asia, fines for AML violations reach tens of millions of euros, possible disqualification of management, and criminal prosecution.
  • Long-term consequences for business: Loss of licenses, account blocking, inclusion in OFAC and EU sanction lists, reputational losses.
The COREDO team supports clients at all stages – from implementing AML policies to protecting interests in investigations and lawsuits.

SEO Keywords: corporate liability, financial crimes, criminal and administrative liability, long-term consequences for business

AML check, how to prepare?

  • Internal audit: Regular process checks, due diligence automation, preparation for regulatory inspections.
  • Implementation of AML policies: Development and update of internal documents, personnel training, integration of new technologies.
  • Preparation for regulatory inspection: Document collection, business process analysis, system stress testing.
Projects implemented by COREDO in the Czech Republic and Singapore showed that a systematic approach to preparing for AML checks minimizes risks and avoids sanctions.

SEO Keywords: due diligence for companies, implementation of AML policies, internal audit, due diligence automation, preparation for regulatory inspection

How to protect business from money laundering

Illustration for the section "How to protect business from money laundering" in the article "The Most Popular Methods of Money Laundering"
Based on years of experience, the COREDO team recommends:

  • Implementing best AML practices: Use international FATF standards, regularly update internal policies.
  • Developing risk management: Assess risks for each business area, implement an early warning system.
  • Ensuring corporate transparency: Disclose beneficiaries, automate KYC and due diligence.
  • Strengthening international cooperation: Use global databases, exchange information with partners and regulators.
  • Integrating KYC and AML into all business processes: Automation and digitization of procedures – the key to efficiency and compliance.

Advice for international business

  • AML is not just a regulatory requirement but a strategic tool for business protection.
  • Combating money laundering requires a systematic approach: from technology implementation to continuous personnel training.
  • Corporate risks can only be minimized under the conditions of transparency, automation, and regular internal audit.
  • Use modern monitoring tools, artificial intelligence, and international standards to enhance AML effectiveness.
  • Be proactive: timely integration of KYC and AML, preparation for inspections, and collaboration with COREDO experts are the keys to your business’s sustainability on the international stage.

Methods of money laundering and their detection

Money laundering method Description/Example Key business risks Effective AML tools
Trade financing Invoice fraud, layering High Transaction monitoring, AI, due diligence
Use of offshore companies Shell companies, hidden beneficiaries Medium KYC, corporate transparency
Cryptocurrencies and digital assets Anonymous transfers, crypto cards Very high Blockchain analytics, monitoring automation
Cash operations and prepaid cards Courier delivery, anonymous cards Medium Cash operations control, limits, reporting
Legalization through real estate Purchase of luxury real estate, luxury items High Transaction analysis, beneficiary control

SEO Keywords of the section: AML, combating money laundering, corporate risks, main insights, practical steps, risk minimization, transparency enhancement, automation, and technology

This article is not just a review but a practical guide based on COREDO’s real expertise. If you are interested in protecting your business and finding reliable solutions, the COREDO team is ready to share its expertise and support you at every stage of international company development.

Registering a cryptocurrency company in Costa Rica opens up flexible business opportunities in a jurisdiction with a favorable economic environment and modern regulations. The country’s economic stability and liberal approach to cryptocurrencies make Costa Rica an attractive choice for starting and further developing a crypto business.

Economic Stability and Regulation

Costa Rica has long established itself as a stable and innovation-friendly jurisdiction. Cryptocurrency companies operate under a territorial tax principle here: taxes are only levied on income earned within the country, allowing international operators to optimize their tax burden. Minimal capital requirements and the absence of mandatory audits for most companies make starting a business quick and cost-effective.

COREDO practice confirms: registering a crypto business abroad through Costa Rica allows clients not only to legalize digital assets but also to build a transparent corporate governance structure that complies with international FATF standards and AML compliance requirements.

Legalizing Crypto Business in Costa Rica

Strategies for entering the Latin American market through Costa Rica are particularly popular among projects aimed at quick launches and integration with international payment systems. Opening a corporate account for a crypto company in Costa Rica is possible with both local and foreign banks, facilitating cross-border payments and customer interactions from the EU and Asia.

The COREDO team has implemented cases where setting up a cryptocurrency company in Costa Rica allowed a client to start legal operations within 3-4 weeks while fully complying with KYC requirements and investor rights protection. This approach is especially effective for projects dealing with asset tokenization, stablecoins, and VASP (Virtual Asset Service Providers).

Buy a Cryptocurrency Company in Costa Rica

For those interested in the fastest market entry, a ready-made cryptocurrency company in Costa Rica is the optimal solution. The key stage here becomes due diligence: checking the legal purity of the company, transaction history, status concerning financial intelligence (UIF), and no restrictions from regulators.

Our experience at COREDO has shown that purchasing a ready-made company with a transparent history and properly executed corporate documents not only speeds up the launch but also minimizes risks for investors. It is important to ensure the protection of all participants’ rights and compliance with international AML/KYC standards.

Registering a Crypto Company in Costa Rica

Illustration for the section "Registering a Crypto Company in Costa Rica" in the article "Cryptocurrency Company in Costa Rica instead of MiCA"

Registering a crypto company in Costa Rica provides access to a stable business climate and loyal regulations for blockchain projects. To take advantage of these benefits and legally operate in the jurisdiction, it is important to clearly understand the registration stages and licensing requirements. Below are the key steps in setting up a crypto company in Costa Rica.

Registration and Licensing: Stages

Registering a company for crypto operations in Costa Rica involves several key stages:

  • Selecting a unique name and reserving it in the registry.
  • Preparing the company’s charter considering the specifics of cryptocurrency activities.
  • Appointing a director and determining the shareholder structure.
  • Registering as a virtual asset service provider (VASP) if necessary.
  • Setting up a corporate account for the crypto company.
  • Implementing corporate governance and AML compliance policies.

The solution developed by COREDO allows the client to go through all the registration stages with minimal time and financial costs, ensuring legal purity and a transparent structure.

Documents for Registering a Crypto Business

Standard documents required for registering a cryptocurrency company in Costa Rica include:

  • Company charter with a description of activities.
  • Identity documents of shareholders and directors.
  • Address verification.
  • Description of the business model and funding sources.
  • Confirmation of KYC/AML procedures implementation.
  • Licensing documents for crypto operators (if required to handle client funds or conduct ICO/STO).

COREDO’s practice shows: thorough documentation preparation and preliminary due diligence significantly speed up the licensing process and minimize the risk of refusal from banks and regulators.

Corporate Account for Crypto Business in Costa Rica

Opening a corporate account for a cryptocurrency company in Costa Rica requires special attention. Banks and payment providers pay close attention to transaction transparency, source of funds, and AML policy. In some cases, additional coordination with financial intelligence (UIF) and an expanded set of documents are required.

The COREDO team supports clients at all stages of integration with international payment systems, ensuring compliance with due diligence requirements and data protection (GDPR, DPA).

AML and KYC for Crypto Companies in Costa Rica

Illustration for the section "AML and KYC for Crypto Companies in Costa Rica" in the article "Cryptocurrency Company in Costa Rica instead of MiCA"

AML and KYC for crypto companies in Costa Rica are not just legal formalities but important tools for protecting both the company and its clients from financial risks and abuses. As international standards are implemented and the regulatory framework evolves, the Costa Rican government emphasizes transparency and security in crypto transactions.

Implementation of International Standards: Requirements

AML for cryptocurrency companies in Costa Rica is based on FATF recommendations and includes mandatory KYC, CFT procedures, and regular transaction monitoring using blockchain analytics technologies. Compliance and KYC for crypto businesses become integral parts of corporate governance and investor protection rights.

The practical implementation of these requirements requires not only the development of internal policies but also constant staff training, integration with blockchain analytics providers, and regular procedure audits.

Thus, effective execution of these measures lays the foundation for further consideration of the differences between national and European regulatory standards.

AML Requirements Costa Rica and EU: Comparison

Criterion Costa Rica EU (MiCA)
Licensing Requirements Minimal, often not required Strict, mandatory licensing
AML/KYC Basic, FATF-oriented EU standards, high control
Taxation Territorial principle Worldwide income
Registry Openness Closed Open
Work with European Clients Restrictions due to blacklists No restrictions
Reporting Requirements No mandatory audit Audit and reporting mandatory

The comparison between MiCA and Costa Rican legislation shows that despite more flexible requirements in Latin America, working with European clients will require the implementation of additional procedures for data protection (GDPR, DPA) and transaction transparency.

Transparency and Compliance Outside the EU

Transparency of transactions and investor rights protection when operating outside the EU are achieved through the implementation of corporate governance, internal control, and regular due diligence. Managing reputational risks requires constant monitoring of legislative changes and integration with international AML and KYC systems.

COREDO practice confirms: using blockchain analytics technologies and independent auditors ensures compliance even in the absence of formal audit requirements.

Cryptocurrency Regulation: Costa Rica and EU

Illustration for the section "Cryptocurrency Regulation: Costa Rica and EU" in the article "Cryptocurrency Company in Costa Rica instead of MiCA"

cryptocurrency regulation: Costa Rica and EU, this is a vivid example of how different countries approach digital assets. Let us examine the main features of regulatory models to understand the principles underlying the policies of Costa Rica and the European Union and how they affect the cryptocurrency market.

Key Differences in Approaches

Cryptocurrency regulation in the EU (MiCA) is built on the principle of strict licensing, mandatory audit, and open registries. In Costa Rica, the approach is more flexible: Licensing of crypto operators is only required for certain activities, and corporate governance can be tailored to the needs of the business.

For companies focused on the legalization of digital assets, tokenization, and conducting ICO/STO, Costa Rica offers a quicker and less costly path to market entry. However, when working with clients from the EU, compliance with MiCA standards and the implementation of additional consumer protection procedures will be required.

Risks of Operating Outside MiCA

Operating outside MiCA opens up new possibilities for scaling a crypto business but also carries certain risks:

  • Restrictions on working with European clients due to blacklists.
  • The need to independently implement AML and KYC standards.
  • Increased scrutiny from banks and investors regarding the legal purity of the company.
  • Possible difficulties in cross-border payments and integration with European payment systems.

A solution implemented by COREDO for one of its clients allowed minimizing legal risks by implementing international AML standards and engaging independent auditors to confirm transaction transparency.

Corporate Taxation and Management

The territorial principle of taxation in Costa Rica allows optimizing the tax burden for international crypto businesses. Transparency of operations is achieved through the implementation of internal control and corporate governance, and the absence of mandatory auditing reduces administrative costs.

The COREDO team recommends implementing internal control procedures and regular audits during the registration phase to increase trust from investors and partners.

Thus, a comprehensive approach to internal procedures will be the key to a successful launch and effective operation of the company in Costa Rica.

Launching a Cryptocurrency Company in Costa Rica

Illustration for the section "Launching a Cryptocurrency Company in Costa Rica" in the article "Cryptocurrency Company in Costa Rica instead of MiCA"

Launching a cryptocurrency company in Costa Rica offers unique opportunities due to flexible regulation, accessible taxation, and the ease of registration. It is essential to consider local market features and activity legalization requirements before scaling the business to ensure stable market entry and successful project development.

Scaling the Business and Market Launch

Scaling a crypto business outside the EU requires a clear strategy for quick market entry, integration with international payment systems, and the implementation of KYC/AML procedures at a level comparable to European standards. Choosing a reliable consulting partner becomes a key success factor.

The solution implemented by COREDO includes comprehensive support at all stages – from selecting the optimal corporate structure to assistance with account opening and blockchain analytics integration.

How to Reduce Legal and Reputational Risks

Minimizing legal risks when registering a crypto company in Costa Rica is achieved by:

  • Conducting expanded due diligence on all participants.
  • Implementing international AML/KYC standards.
  • Regular auditing of operations and transparency of the corporate structure.
  • Protecting investors’ rights through the implementation of internal policies and procedures.

The COREDO team accompanies clients at all stages, helping to build a reputation risk management system and ensure the legal purity of the company.

Mistakes When Choosing a Jurisdiction

Typical mistakes include underestimating jurisdictional risk assessment, a formal approach to compliance, and the absence of independent audits. The legal purity of the company and transaction transparency must be confirmed not only by internal procedures but also by external auditors.

COREDO’s experience shows that thorough preparation and a comprehensive compliance approach allow avoiding most mistakes and ensuring long-term business sustainability.

Main Conclusions and Recommendations

Illustration for the section "Main Conclusions and Recommendations" in the article "Cryptocurrency Company in Costa Rica instead of MiCA"

A cryptocurrency company in Costa Rica: this is not just an alternative to MiCA for cryptocurrency companies but a strategic tool for quick international market entry, tax burden optimization, and minimizing administrative barriers. choosing a jurisdiction should be based on a deep risk assessment, transparent corporate structure, and readiness to integrate international AML/KYC standards.

COREDO practice confirms: comprehensive business support, due diligence implementation, and constant monitoring of regulatory changes allow not only the legalization of crypto business in Latin America but also ensure its long-term sustainability and investment attractiveness.

If your goal is scaling a crypto business outside the EU, protecting investor rights, and ensuring transaction transparency, Costa Rica becomes one of the most promising jurisdictions. The COREDO team is ready to offer practical solutions tailored to the specifics of your project and international market requirements.

$13 billion in net profit per year, that is the amount, by the most conservative estimates, generated by Tether, the largest stablecoin issuer, in 2024–2025. For comparison: the revenues of many traditional banks and asset managers with comparable asset volumes are significantly lower. How did Tether and Circle, the issuers of USDT and USDC, transform into an invisible “printing machine” for the cryptoeconomy, and why have their business models become the subject of close interest not only from entrepreneurs but also regulators worldwide?

Today, stablecoins are not merely a tool for fast international transactions or hedging volatility. Their market capitalization exceeds $200 billion, and the liquidity of USDT and USDC has become the standard for institutional clients, venture funds, and fintech companies on all continents. However, behind the apparent simplicity—one token equals one dollar—lies a complex system of backing, reserve management, banking interactions, and strategic partnerships.

Why does Tether’s profit exceed Circle’s revenue despite less transparency? How are interest incomes distributed between the issuer and institutional partners? What risks does Tether’s model pose for corporate clients, and how is regulation in the EU and Asia changing the rules of the game for the entire market?

In this article, I, Nikita Veremeev, founder of COREDO, propose to dissect the business models of Tether and Circle, reveal their real income sources, uncover regulatory nuances, and provide practical recommendations for companies that already use or plan to integrate stablecoins into their processes. If you want not just to understand how this market works but to gain strategic ideas for business development, read on.

Profits of Tether and Circle Stablecoins

Illustration for the section "Profits of Tether and Circle Stablecoins" in the article "How Tether and Circle Actually Make Money. The Invisible $13 Billion Printing Machine"
Profits of Tether and Circle Stablecoins are largely formed due to their unique approach to reserve and investment management. To understand how issuers ensure token stability and generate income, it’s essential to examine their approaches to issuance and reserves.

Issuance and Reserves of Stablecoins

The basic logic behind stablecoin issuance is simple: every new USDT or USDC is issued under the provision of fiat currency (usually the US dollar) or equivalent liquid assets. A client, whether an exchange, OTC desk, or institutional investor, sends dollars to the issuer’s bank account, receiving tokens in return. During the reverse operation—redemption—the issuer burns tokens and returns fiat.

However, in practice, stablecoin backing is not just about fiat deposits. Reserves of Tether and Circle include US Treasury bonds, bank deposits, commercial papers, and in Tether’s case, several less transparent instruments. Reserve management becomes a separate income source: the funds held in accounts work for the issuer, bringing in interest income.

Our experience at COREDO has shown that for large corporate clients, the key question is not only the liquidity of stablecoins but also the transparency of token redemption mechanisms as well as the quality of reserve assets. In crisis situations, such as mass withdrawals: it’s the reserve structure and the ability to quickly convert them into fiat that determine an issuer’s sustainability.

Income from Interests and Investments

The main source of stablecoin profits is interest income from investing reserves. In an environment of high Fed rates in 2023–2025, the yield on short-term US Treasury bonds exceeded 5% per annum. With reserves amounting to hundreds of billions of dollars, even a small difference between the asset’s interest rate and the issuer’s liabilities results in billion-dollar profits.

The solution developed at COREDO to analyze issuers’ financial flows highlights several key elements:

  • Tether invests a significant portion of reserves in treasuries and other liquid instruments, receiving interest income that almost entirely remains with the issuer. According to COREDO estimates, in 2024, Tether’s revenues exceeded $13 billion due to rising interest rates and an increase in USDT issuance.
  • Circle, on the other hand, shares up to 50% of the interest income with institutional partners, primarily Coinbase. This reduces the issuer’s net profit but ensures a stable institutional infrastructure and a high level of trust from corporate clients.
  • In addition to interest income, there are hidden profit sources: issuance and redemption fees, investments in high-yield instruments, income from operations with crypto reserves, and partnership programs with exchanges.

COREDO’s practice confirms: for companies dealing with large volumes of stablecoins, it is important to consider not only the nominal reserve yield but also the risks associated with asset structure and liquidity management strategies.

Distribution of Income Between Partners and Issuers

The profit distribution strategy distinguishes Tether from Circle. In Tether’s model, almost all interest income stays with the issuer, ensuring maximum profitability but creating conflicts of interest with institutional clients and partners. In the case of Circle, up to 50% of USDC reserve income is divided between the issuer and partners, primarily Coinbase, which lowers the margin but increases the ecosystem’s sustainability.

COREDO’s team has implemented projects for clients for whom understanding how income is distributed between the issuer and their bank-partner or exchange was critically important. In several jurisdictions, especially in the EU and Asia, transparency in income distribution becomes a regulatory requirement and a factor in the choice of issuer for corporate clients.

Comparison of Tether and Circle’s Reports

Illustration for the section "Comparison of Tether and Circle

Comparing Tether and Circle’s reports helps to understand how the largest stablecoin issuers ensure user trust in their tokens through regular financial data disclosure. Differences in transparency levels and auditor roles play a key role in the perceived reliability of each project, especially against the backdrop of increasing scrutiny of reserves and control mechanisms in the stablecoin sector.

Disclosure of Reserves: Auditor’s Role

The issue of reserves transparency is one of the most pressing for the stablecoin market. Circle publishes monthly reserve reports, and the audit by Deloitte and Touche, a recognized Big Four auditor, provides an additional layer of trust. USDC’s reserves are primarily held in US Treasury bonds and accounts at the Bank of New York Mellon, meeting institutional reporting standards.

Tether, on the contrary, offers periodic reports and does not conduct regular independent audits according to Big Four standards, creating risks for institutional clients and complicating the assessment of the actual quality of reserves.

COREDO’s experience in licensing and compliance support for clients in the EU and Asia shows: to enter new markets and work with major institutional partners, financial transparency as well as compliance with international audit and reserve certification standards is required.

Transparency or Profitability: What to Choose?

Tether’s model demonstrates: minimal transparency allows for maximum profitability, but increases long-term risks for the issuer and clients. Circle, however, sacrifices part of the income for the sake of transparency and sustainability.

In COREDO’s corporate practice, we have encountered cases where clients chose a less profitable but more transparent stablecoin for integration into their business processes, especially with the tightening of regulation and reserve audit requirements. The long-term sustainability of the business directly depends on balancing transparency and profitability, as well as the issuer’s ability to adapt to new market requirements.

Stablecoin Regulation in the EU, Asia, and Africa

Illustration for the section "Stablecoin Regulation in the EU, Asia, and Africa" in the article "How Tether and Circle Actually Make Money. The Invisible $13 Billion Printing Machine"
Stablecoin Regulation in the EU, Asia, and Africa significantly changes the global crypto-assets market. The introduction of unified standards, such as MiCA in Europe, requires issuers to adopt new approaches to transparency and risk management, while Asian and African countries gradually form their own rules to keep pace with global trends. This creates new challenges and opportunities for profitability and the development of stablecoins in each region.

The Impact of MiCA on Stablecoin Profits

The introduction of MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) in the EU has become a turning point for the stablecoin market. The new regulation requires not only full disclosure of reserve structures but also regular independent audits, implementation of KYC/AML procedures, and emission restrictions for non-qualified investors.

COREDO’s solutions for clients in the EU and Slovakia showed that implementing MiCA leads to increased compliance costs and reduced issuer margins, but at the same time increases trust from institutional clients. For Tether, this means the need to restructure its business model, reduce the share of opaque assets, and increase spending on audits and information disclosure. For Circle, new requirements become a competitive advantage, allowing for expanded presence in the European market.

AML/KYC for Business

Modern KYC/AML procedures and financial compliance are an integral part of the corporate infrastructure when dealing with stablecoins. Non-compliance with these requirements leads to risks of account blocking, fines, and loss of access to key markets.

COREDO’s practice in Asia and the EU confirms that for successful integration of USDT and USDC into corporate processes, it is necessary to build internal compliance procedures, automate transaction monitoring, and regularly conduct audits to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. This allows minimizing non-compliance risks and increasing efficiency in working with institutional partners.

Regulation in Asia and Africa

In Asia, stablecoin regulation ranges from strict licensing requirements (Singapore, Hong Kong) to more flexible regimes (UAE, some Southeast Asian countries). In Africa, there is growing institutional demand for transparent stablecoins for cross-border payments and inflation protection.

The COREDO team has implemented projects for company registration and obtaining financial licenses in Singapore, Dubai, and Estonia, where meeting local information disclosure requirements and forming strategic partnerships with banks and payment providers was key to success. For business scaling in these regions, it is critical to consider regulation specifics and build institutional infrastructure that meets international standards.

Risks for Issuers and Corporate Clients

Illustration for the section "Risks for Issuers and Corporate Clients" in the article "How Tether and Circle Actually Make Money. The Invisible $13 Billion Printing Machine"

Risks for issuers and corporate clients become especially significant in the rapidly changing cryptocurrency market and limited regulation. Besides high volatility and technical complexities, companies need to pre-assess potential threats associated with liquidity, token redemption, and reserve reliability to minimize possible losses and protect client interests.

Liquidity and Token Redemption: Reserve Testing

The liquidity of stablecoins and an issuer’s ability to ensure quick token redemption are key parameters for corporate clients. During periods of market turbulence, it is the quality of reserve assets and the presence of stress-testing that determine an issuer’s sustainability.

COREDO’s solution for assessing the liquidity of USDT and USDC includes analyzing reserve structures, asset diversification, and stress-testing scenarios. For companies working with large volumes, it is crucial to regularly conduct independent reserve checks and evaluate liquidity risks in case of mass fund withdrawals.

Thus, for a comprehensive assessment of sustainability, it is important to consider not only an issuer’s internal mechanisms but also external macroeconomic factors, such as the dynamics of interest rates and inflation.

The Impact of Interest Rates and Inflation

Stablecoin profitability is directly tied to Fed interest rates and macroeconomic factors. Rising rates increase Tether’s and Circle’s revenues but simultaneously raise requirements for reserve quality and risk management. Inflation and market volatility can lead to emission limits and reduced profitability, especially under stricter regulation conditions.

COREDO’s practice has shown: for long-term business sustainability, it is necessary to implement hedging tools for interest and currency risks, and to regularly review reserve management strategies considering market capitalization changes and regulatory requirements.

Loss of Trust: Market Consequences

A loss of trust in the issuer is a scenario that may occur with insufficient transparency, problems with token redemption, or identified reserve structure inconsistencies. For Tether, this means potential capital outflows and increased regulatory pressure. For Circle, risks are linked to possible failures in the partnership infrastructure and changes in income distribution.

Tether’s key competitive advantage is its scale and liquidity, but long-term stability requires adaptation to new transparency standards and corporate governance. Comparison with traditional asset managers like BlackRock underscores that institutional demand for transparent and sustainable stablecoins will only increase.

Tether or Circle – What to Choose?

Illustration for the section "Tether or Circle - What to Choose?" in the article "How Tether and Circle Actually Make Money. The Invisible $13 Billion Printing Machine"

The question of Tether or Circle, what to choose? concerns everyone seeking stability and reliability in the world of stablecoins. To make an informed choice, it is important to understand the key parameters and indicators of each project: from capitalization and transparency to the level of regulation and usage specifics.

Parameters and Indicators of Tether and Circle

Parameter Tether (USDT) Circle (USDC)
Market Capitalization ~$146 billion (2025) ~$60 billion (2025)
Reserve Structure US Treasury bonds, cash 80% treasuries, 20% – Bank of NY Mellon
Level of Transparency Limited, irregular audit Monthly reports, Deloitte audit
Reserve Yield Higher (revenue $13 billion in 2024) Lower, 50% shared with Coinbase
Income Distribution In favor of the issuer 50%: institutional partners
Main Partners Crypto exchanges, OTC desks Coinbase, Bybit, banks
Scaling Strategies Global expansion Focus on compliance and EU

Thus, differences in reserve management, transparency, and partnership strategies define each stablecoin’s specific nature and are relevant when evaluating their usage for businesses.

Risks and Applications of Stablecoins for Businesses

Risks and Applications of Stablecoins for Businesses are not just new opportunities for asset management and transactions but also pose important questions regarding trust, regulation, and stability. Before integrating such tools into business processes or considering them for investments, key risks and criteria for choosing the right stablecoin should be carefully evaluated.

How to Choose a Stablecoin for Investment

Assessing the issuer’s reliability is the first step when integrating stablecoins into corporate processes. Selection criteria include reserve transparency, the presence of independent audits, compliance with institutional reporting standards, and the quality of partnership infrastructure.

COREDO recommends requesting regular reserve reports from the issuer, verified by Big Four auditors, and analyzing asset structures and token redemption mechanisms. For companies operating in the EU and Asia, compliance with MiCA and local regulatory requirements becomes mandatory.

Compliance and KYC/AML for Business

Implementing stablecoins requires building internal compliance procedures, automating KYC/AML, and integrating financial compliance across all stages of token operations. A solution developed by COREDO allows for transaction monitoring automation, risk minimization of non-compliance, and enhancing interaction efficiency with banks and institutional partners.

For corporate clients, it is important not only to comply with regulatory requirements but also to build processes that minimize transaction costs and enhance operation transparency.

Metrics and KPIs for Stablecoin Implementation

Key efficiency metrics include:

  • ROI of stablecoin implementation in corporate payments
  • Reduction in transaction costs compared to traditional tools
  • Liquidity level and token redemption speed
  • Share of operations compliant with KYC/AML and compliance requirements
  • Regularity and quality of reserve audits

COREDO’s practice shows that integrating these metrics into corporate reporting not only enhances work efficiency but also minimizes strategic risks during business scaling.

Key Insights for Businesses and Leaders

  • The business models of Tether and Circle demonstrate different approaches to balancing profitability and transparency. Tether focuses on maximizing income through minimal transparency, Circle: on institutional stability and compliance.
  • Regulation (primarily MiCA in the EU) becomes a determining factor for issuers’ long-term sustainability and competitiveness. Companies choosing stablecoins for corporate payments must consider not just current profitability but also risks associated with changing regulatory environments.
  • Regular reserve audits, transparency in asset structure, and implementing compliance procedures that meet international standards are critically important. This minimizes non-compliance risks and increases trust from partners and regulators.
  • Integrating stablecoins into corporate processes requires strategic planning, ROI assessment, and implementing efficiency metrics. Solutions implemented by the COREDO team enable not only cost reduction but also long-term sustainability of the business in a rapidly changing financial ecosystem.
If you plan to scale your business in the EU, Asia, or Africa, integrate stablecoins into corporate processes, or obtain a financial license, COREDO’s experience and our comprehensive solutions will help build an effective and secure infrastructure that meets tomorrow’s requirements.

In 2025, the UK’s digital asset market enters a new era: according to the FCA, over 70% of companies previously working with UK clients do not meet the new authorisation requirements and are forced to revise their business models. Amidst this, the number of requests for FCA authorisation for crypto platforms has doubled over the last six months. Why such sweeping changes? New FCA crypto rules and UK cryptoasset regulation are not just another wave of compliance, but a strategic shift that changes the rules of the game for international companies, institutional investors, and fintech startups.

Today, digital asset regulation in the UK is becoming one of the most comprehensive and detailed in Europe. HM Treasury crypto policy and UK crypto legislation now cover not only traditional exchanges and wallets but also DeFi protocols, stablecoin issuers, intermediaries, and even foreign platforms working with UK retail clients.

Businesses face questions: how to maintain market access, ensure compliance with new requirements, minimize costs, and not miss new opportunities? In this article, I will thoroughly dissect the key changes in UK crypto regulation 2025, their strategic and operational impacts, and provide practical recommendations based on COREDO’s experience in supporting international projects for legal entity registration, licensing, and implementing AML/KYC in the EU, the UK, Singapore, and Dubai. If you want to not just survive but become a leader in the new market: this guide is for you.

Key Changes in Cryptocurrency Regulation in the UK 2025

Illustration for the section "Key Changes in Cryptocurrency Regulation in the UK 2025" in the article "Major UK Crypto Regulation Update 2025"
Key changes in cryptocurrency regulation in the UK 2025 reflect a new stage in forming the legal framework for digital assets and stablecoins. Starting from early 2025, UK authorities introduce updated rules aligning cryptocurrency service requirements with traditional financial sector standards. Below, we explore the main elements of this regulatory framework and precisely what has changed for all market participants.

Regulatory Framework: What Has Changed?

In 2025, the UK crypto regulatory framework 2025 comes into effect, introducing for the first time the concepts of “qualifying cryptoassets” and “qualifying stablecoins”. Now, not only traditional utility tokens but also a wide range of digital assets, including stablecoins, security tokens, and even certain NFTs used as payment or investment instruments, fall under regulation.
Special attention is given to expanding the list of regulated activities: issuance, custody, trading, administration, exchange, as well as reserve management and redemption for stablecoins. For the first time, the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 officially applies to crypto assets, necessitating mandatory licensing for anyone providing services in the UK or working with UK clients.

FCA Licensing Requirements 2025

Starting in 2025, mandatory FCA authorisation applies to all crypto trading platforms, stablecoin issuers, cryptoasset intermediaries, and even overseas crypto exchanges if they serve UK retail clients. The registration process includes several stages: preparing the corporate structure, implementing compliance procedures, IT infrastructure audit, and AML/KYC, as well as demonstrating readiness for safeguarding and administration of cryptoassets.
The solution developed at COREDO for clients entering the UK market involves step-by-step preparation for FCA crypto rules: from analyzing the business model to implementing UK crypto compliance requirements and preparing for Cryptoasset exchange authorisation. Special attention is given to new requirements for cryptoasset intermediary authorisation and procedures for overseas crypto exchanges UK authorisation, where the key barrier becomes the need for a physical presence and UK-centric infrastructure.

Geographical Requirements and Restrictions

UK cross-border crypto regulation now covers all companies offering services to UK clients, regardless of their registration jurisdiction. Territoriality requirements and physical presence requirement are introduced: obtaining authorisation requires a local branch, a local team, and IT infrastructure that complies with FCA standards.
For cross-border crypto services, this means revising operational models and significant investments in localization. The COREDO team’s experience has demonstrated that successfully overcoming these barriers is possible only through early integration of FCA requirements into the market entry strategy and building UK-centric infrastructure.

Regulation of the Crypto Market by Segments

Illustration for the section "Regulation of the Crypto Market by Segments" in the article "Major UK Crypto Regulation Update 2025"
Regulation of the crypto market by segments is becoming increasingly specific: different parts of the market require their own rules and standards. This approach allows for taking into account the features of each direction and building effective control mechanisms, starting with stablecoin regulation and standards for their issuers.

Stablecoin Regulation and Standards for Issuers

UK stablecoin regulation introduces strict requirements for reserves, transparency, and redemption. Issuers must ensure 100% fund reserving, regular reporting, and the possibility of immediate fund return upon customer request. Cryptoasset safeguarding and cryptoasset administration rules become mandatory elements of internal control.
For stablecoin issuers, this means the need to revise business models, implement new procedures for cryptoasset listing requirements, and prepare for regular audits. COREDO’s experience in supporting stablecoin issuance projects in Europe and Asia confirms: early compliance with new standards reduces the risk of operational blocks and increases confidence among institutional investors.

DeFi: New Staking Rules

UK DeFi regulation first formalizes criteria for truly decentralized protocols: if there is no controlling party, such projects can get an exemption from regulation. However, for most DeFi platforms and services like staking and crypto lending regulation, new requirements for AML/KYC, smart contract transparency, and risk management are introduced.
Implementing Decentralised Finance (DeFi) compliance becomes mandatory for anyone attracting funds from retail or institutional investors. COREDO’s practice showed that integrating procedures of crypto staking regulation and crypto lending regulation at an early stage of product development significantly accelerates the authorisation process and reduces compliance process adjustment costs.

Regulation of Crypto Exchanges and Brokers

Cryptoasset trading platforms (CATPs) are now required to undergo separate authorisation and meet new standards for risk management, safeguarding, and reporting. Cryptoasset intermediaries FCA has stricter requirements for corporate governance, asset validation, and client protection.
Implementing these standards requires new procedures for cryptoasset trading platforms authorisation and revising internal policies. The COREDO team has implemented comprehensive projects to prepare platforms for new requirements, enabling clients not only to pass authorisation but also to increase investment attractiveness for institutional partners.

AML, KYC and Investor Protection

Illustration for the section "AML, KYC and Investor Protection" in the article "Major UK Crypto Regulation Update 2025"
AML, KYC and **investor protection mechanisms** become the standard for all financial market participants. Such measures not only minimize risks of money laundering and fraud but also directly contribute to strengthening trust and safety for clients and investors.

New Requirements for AML, KYC, and Safeguarding

Crypto compliance UK reaches a new level: implementing best practices of AML (Anti-Money Laundering) for crypto and KYC (Know Your Customer) in crypto becomes mandatory for all market participants. The FCA requires not only the technical implementation of procedures but also their integration into business processes, regular staff training, and independent audits.
Safeguarding cryptoassets is another key element: companies must keep client assets separate from their own, use segregated accounts, and ensure constant transaction monitoring. COREDO’s experience has shown that implementing comprehensive cryptoasset safeguarding requirements reduces the risk of account blockages and increases the level of trust from clients and regulators.

Monitoring and Abuse Prevention

Starting in 2025, new requirements for cryptoasset monitoring and reporting are introduced: all operations must be recorded, analyzed for market manipulation (pump and dump), insider trading prevention, and cryptoasset fraud prevention. Companies are required to implement automatic monitoring systems, provide regular reports to the FCA, and be ready for unplanned inspections.
COREDO’s practice confirms: integrating modern solutions for monitoring and fraud prevention allows not only to comply with new requirements but also to significantly improve operational efficiency and reduce the cost of incident investigations.

Consumer and Investor Rights

UK crypto investor protection comes to the forefront: new rules provide for asset return mechanisms, property rights protection, and the introduction of standards for cryptoasset governance rules. Special attention is given to digital asset property law and ensuring transparency in corporate governance.
For institutional and retail investors, this means an increased level of protection, and for businesses, the need to implement new procedures for governance, validation, and reporting. Solutions implemented by COREDO for clients from the EU and the UK showed that a proactive stance in consumer protection in crypto helps attract large investors and reduces regulatory risks.

Implementation of New Rules: Practical Steps

Illustration for the section "Implementation of New Rules: Practical Steps" in the article "Major UK Crypto Regulation Update 2025"
Implementing new rules requires a detailed analysis of current business processes and the search for growth points. Practical steps on this path will help adapt the company model to maximize return on investment (ROI) and sustainable development in new conditions.

Adapting the Business Model for ROI Growth

Cryptoasset business model adaptation becomes a key challenge: new requirements lead to increased compliance, IT, and staff training costs, but simultaneously open up access to a wider range of institutional clients. Evaluating cryptoasset ROI metrics requires considering not only direct expenses but also potential benefits from increased trust, reduced operational risks, and market expansion.
The COREDO team helps clients build cryptoasset scaling strategies, optimizing compliance processes and reducing costs at each stage of implementing new standards. Conducting a cryptoasset regulatory impact assessment allows for assessing the impact of changes on the business model in advance and adjusting the development strategy.

Company Registration and Corporate Governance

Starting in 2025, the procedure for cryptoasset legal entity structuring and company registration in the UK becomes more complicated: more detailed corporate structure development, the implementation of procedures for cryptoasset governance, and asset validation is required. UK crypto business legal requirements include the mandatory presence of independent directors, auditors, and the implementation of internal control systems.
COREDO’s practice has shown that early integration of governance and validation requirements can expedite the registration and authorisation process and minimize the risk of rejection by the FCA. For clients entering the UK market, we develop individual roadmaps for adapting corporate governance to new standards.

Impact on International Companies and Operations

UK cross-border crypto regulation creates new barriers for overseas crypto exchanges and companies from Europe and Asia, but simultaneously opens opportunities for those ready to invest in localization and compliance. Requirements for physical presence and UK-centric infrastructure necessitate revising operational models, but offer a strategic advantage in accessing UK institutional investors.
Solutions implemented by COREDO for international clients include comprehensive preparation for overseas crypto exchanges UK authorisation, adapting business processes to UK crypto regulation for institutional investors, and building effective cross-border compliance strategies.

Challenges and Opportunities for Market Participants

Illustration for the section "Challenges and Opportunities for Market Participants" in the article "Major UK Crypto Regulation Update 2025"
Challenges and Opportunities for Market Participants the role of **platforms** and **intermediaries** is especially important, as they determine the rules of engagement between manufacturers, buyers, and other market players.

Platforms and Intermediaries – What Are They?

Cryptoasset intermediary authorisation becomes one of the most resource-intensive processes: new compliance costs, the need to implement complex monitoring and reporting systems, and increased corporate governance requirements. Cryptoasset market entry barriers are rising, but for those who successfully undergo authorisation, new niches and opportunities for partnership with major institutional players open up.

What Institutional Investors and Banks Need to Know

UK crypto regulation for institutional investors introduces new market access standards, risk management, and compliance requirements. For banks and funds, this implies the need to revise investment strategies, implement new risk assessment procedures, and continuously monitor legislative changes.
COREDO’s experience has shown that proactive adaptation to new standards allows institutional investors to minimize regulatory risks and increase portfolio returns.

SEO for Startups and Fintech Companies

Crypto market innovation and support from the UK Plan for Change open up new opportunities for startups: simplified authorisation procedures for innovative projects, access to regulatory sandbox, and the ability to test new business models in a controlled environment. Cryptoasset regulatory roadmap allows for building a phased market entry strategy and minimizing compliance costs.

Practical Business Advice

  • Analyze your business model: Determine whether your activities fall under the new UK crypto regulation 2025 requirements.
  • Prepare your corporate structure: Implement procedures for governance, safeguarding, and asset validation.
  • Plan for FCA authorisation: Gather the necessary documents, implement AML/KYC, and prepare IT infrastructure.
  • Implement best AML/KYC practices: Use modern solutions for automating client checks and transaction monitoring.
  • Optimize your tax burden: Consult with experts on cryptoasset tax compliance UK.
  • Prepare for transition phases: Follow updates from the FCA Consultation Paper CP25/14, CP25/15, and HM Treasury draft legislation.
  • Evaluate compliance ROI: Use efficiency metrics to adapt compliance procedures for strategic adjustments.

Insights for Entrepreneurs and Executives

UK crypto regulation 2025 is not just a tightening of rules but a new reality where those who can quickly adapt, invest in compliance, and build transparent business models succeed. For a successful market entry in the UK, it is important to:
  • Implement comprehensive compliance procedures at an early stage.
  • Prepare corporate structure and IT infrastructure for new requirements.
  • Leverage the experience of reliable partners to minimize risks and accelerate authorisation.
  • Constantly monitor legislative changes and adjust the development strategy.
COREDO’s practice has shown: a proactive approach to adopting new standards not only reduces regulatory risks but also opens access to strategic opportunities in one of Europe’s most promising markets.

Licensing Requirements for Participants

Type of Participant FCA authorisation Requirements AML/KYC Safeguarding Monitoring & Reporting Key Features 2025
Crypto trading platforms Yes Yes Yes Yes New CASS, CRYPTO standards
Stablecoin issuers Yes (UK issuers) Yes Yes Yes Reserve and redemption requirements
Overseas exchanges Yes (if working with UK retail clients) Yes Yes Yes Physical presence requirement
DeFi protocols (truly decentralised) No No No No Exemptions if no controlling party
Cryptoasset intermediaries Yes Yes Yes Yes New governance requirements
If you are planning to scale your business, enter the UK market, or adapt your existing structure to new requirements – COREDO’s team is ready to offer strategic solutions based on deep expertise and practical experience in international legal and financial consulting.

Today, businesses face unprecedented complexity in EU AML legislation, tightened controls on beneficial ownership transparency, and the need to integrate digital onboarding and eKYC. Moreover, companies from the CIS entering European and Asian markets face challenges of cross-jurisdictional compliance, differences in due diligence procedures, and the necessity to comply with FATF recommendations by 2025.

As CEO of COREDO, I see daily how these challenges transform the market and require new strategies from businesses. In this article, I will detail the key changes to KYC procedures in 2025 and EU AML requirements, share practical solutions that the COREDO team has implemented for clients in the EU, Singapore, Dubai, and the CIS, and provide specific recommendations on how to prepare your business for the new standards. If you want not just to survive the era of regulatory changes but to use them as a competitive advantage, read to the end. Here you will find not only an in-depth analysis but also practical steps for effective AML/KYC compliance.

KYC for Business in the EU and CIS 2025

Illustration for the section "KYC for Business in the EU and CIS 2025" in the article "New Requirements for KYC-AML Procedures in the EU and CIS from 2025"

KYC for business in the EU and CIS in 2025 becomes a key tool for ensuring transparency and preventing financial crimes in conducting international activities. It is important to note that KYC requirements can vary significantly between different jurisdictions, with regulators tightening controls and increasing responsibilities for non-compliance with standards. Below, we will discuss which KYC standards will be relevant for companies in 2025 in these regions.

KYC Standards for Companies in 2025

Starting in 2025, businesses in the EU and CIS are required to implement customer due diligence (CDD) and enhanced due diligence (EDD) based on a risk-based approach. The new KYC 2025 standards require mandatory electronic identification of clients (eKYC) using digital onboarding and remote verification, as established in the updated eIDAS requirements and the EU’s AML directives (6AMLD).

COREDO’s practice confirms: implementing platforms with automated document verification, biometric identification, and integration with state registries allows not only to speed up onboarding but also significantly reduce operational risks. For instance, a project launching digital onboarding for a European payment provider reduced the client verification time from 3 days to 40 minutes while the false positive rate in sanctions screening dropped by 60%.

Identification of Business Beneficiaries

From 2025, the verification of beneficiaries (beneficial ownership transparency) becomes mandatory, including identification of the ultimate beneficial owner (UBO), source of funds verification, and continuous client status monitoring. Beneficiary ownership registers in the EU are now integrated with national and international systems, requiring businesses to maintain transparency in ownership structure and regularly update data.

A solution developed by COREDO for a large holding with offices in the Czech Republic and Estonia allowed the automation of the collection and verification of beneficiary data, the implementation of continuous customer monitoring, and effective sanctions screening including PEP and their associates. This approach minimizes the risks of fines and account freezes and facilitates interactions with regulators.

KYC for CIS Companies and International Deals

CIS companies entering the EU markets face additional challenges: differences in KYC standards, the absence of a unified beneficiary registry, and the complexity of cross-border payments compliance.

For instance, company registration in Singapore or Dubai requires the integration of remote verification and eKYC procedures as well as compliance with the harmonization of standards between the EU and Asian jurisdictions. Our experience shows that only a comprehensive strategy including due diligence procedures, cross-jurisdictional compliance, and regular compliance audits allows for risk minimization and sustainable business development.

In the face of rapid changes in the EU regulatory framework, preparation for the new AML requirements in 2025 becomes critically important for a successful expansion into European markets.

EU AML Requirements 2025, Business Changes

Illustration for the section "EU AML Requirements 2025, Business Changes" in the article "New Requirements for KYC-AML Procedures in the EU and CIS from 2025"

In 2025, EU AML requirements undergo significant changes that impact a wide range of businesses – from financial institutions to crypto companies and new sectors. For businesses, this means not only tighter control and procedures but also the need to review and adapt their internal regulations to the new regulatory standards.

6AMLD and AMLR: What Changed?

From 2025, the 6th EU AML directive (6AMLD) and AMLR regulation come into force, strengthening AML/KYC compliance requirements for all financial market participants. Key innovations include the expansion of the list of predicate offences, the establishment of a single European anti-money laundering authority (AMLA), enhanced reporting obligations, and increased penalties for violations.

COREDO’s team implemented a project for an international investment fund where new suspicious activity reporting (SAR) procedures and internal control automation allowed not only compliance with new requirements but also increased the company’s investment attractiveness through transparency of compliance processes.

Monitoring and Reporting of Suspicious Activities

In 2025, transaction monitoring becomes fully automated: transaction monitoring systems with AI support, transaction scoring, AML filters for sanction lists, and PEP monitoring are implemented. New standards require continuous operation analysis, detection of unusual patterns, and immediate reporting on suspicious activities (SAR).

Implementing such systems at COREDO for a European fintech startup enabled the integration of machine learning into KYC and AML, improved the accuracy of detecting suspicious transactions, and reduced the costs associated with manual data processing. As a result, the company successfully passed a compliance officer audit and received a license for payment services in the EU.

Preventing Money Laundering: Control

The 2025 money laundering prevention policy requires not only formal procedures but their deep integration into the company’s internal processes. Compliance officer duties include regular internal AML/KYC audits, the implementation of whistleblowing procedures, self-assessment compliance, and outsourcing of certain functions if necessary.

COREDO’s experience shows that an effective internal control policy is not just about compliance but a tool for risk management and enhancing trust from partners and investors. Implementing automated compliance audits and regular employee training minimizes the human factor and increases the business’s resilience to regulatory changes.

KYC/AML Automation: Trends 2025

Illustration for the section "KYC/AML Automation: Trends 2025" in the article "New Requirements for KYC-AML Procedures in the EU and CIS from 2025"

KYC/AML automation becomes a key trend in 2025, allowing businesses to respond more quickly to new challenges and more effectively counter financial fraud. The development of technologies, including artificial intelligence and anti-fraud integration, forms new standards in client verification and money laundering prevention.

KYC Automation and Anti-Fraud Integration

In 2025, KYC process automation and anti-fraud system integration become standards for companies working with fintech, payment services, and cryptocurrencies. The use of AI, digital onboarding, KYC utilities, and anti-fraud tools not only speeds up the identification processes but also improves client verification quality.

The COREDO team implemented a platform for one of the large European merchant aggregators, which combines automated KYC, transaction scoring, and integration with external anti-fraud services. This approach ensures a high level of identity theft prevention and effectively identifies high-risk clients at early stages of interaction.

GDPR and AML/KYC: How to Comply with Requirements?

One of the main challenges of 2025 becomes balancing between GDPR requirements and AML/KYC. Data protection, the implementation of eIDAS, and electronic identification require companies to strictly adhere to data privacy vs. AML principles, especially during remote verification and digital onboarding.

A solution implemented by COREDO for a fintech company in Estonia allowed the integration of AML/KYC compliance with internal IT systems, ensured automatic reporting, GDPR compliance, and enhanced client trust through transparency in data processing.

AML in Fintech and Cryptocurrencies

AML for crypto and fintech businesses in 2025 requires a special approach: implementing KYC for crypto companies, using blockchain and AML, participating in regulatory sandboxes, and continuously updating procedures in line with FATF recommendations.

COREDO’s practice shows that only adaptive AML/KYC processes based on machine learning and continuous customer monitoring allow fintech companies and crypto businesses to successfully pass Licensing and scale operations in international markets.

Effective management of these processes is impossible without the involvement of a qualified compliance officer, whose role becomes crucial at all stages of AML/KYC.

The Role of a Compliance Officer in AML/KYC Business

Illustration for the section "The Role of a Compliance Officer in AML/KYC Business" in the article "New Requirements for KYC-AML Procedures in the EU and CIS from 2025"

The role of a compliance officer in AML/KYC business is becoming increasingly key, as these specialists are responsible for building, implementing, and continuously improving the systems combating financial crimes. In modern realities, the compliance officer ensures compliance with AML and KYC requirements, acting as a liaison between the business and the regulator.

Duties of a Compliance Officer in 2025

In 2025, the duties of a compliance officer go beyond classic monitoring: a deep understanding of AML/KYC standards, conducting regular compliance audits, implementing whistleblowing, and managing internal policies are required. The legal responsibility of compliance officers for non-compliance with the new standards significantly increases, necessitating continuous training and the integration of new technologies.

The COREDO team, in accompanying clients in the UK and Slovakia, implemented an internal audit system that allows compliance officers to promptly identify and eliminate discrepancies and prepare the company for regulatory inspections.

Preparing for Audits and Company Inspections

Legal business support in the EU and CIS in 2025 includes preparation for compliance audits, self-assessment compliance, and the formation of reports according to new standards. It is important not only to have formal policies but to ensure their actual implementation in practice.

A solution implemented by COREDO for an international holding included checklists for audits, data collection automation, and integration with state registries. This approach significantly reduces preparation time for inspections and the risk of fines.

How to Reduce Risks and Costs for AML/KYC

COREDO’s experience shows that compliance cost optimization is possible through the introduction of technologies, outsourcing some functions, and selecting effective platforms for KYC/AML. For example, transferring to cloud compliance platforms with AI support allowed one of the clients to reduce AML costs by 35% without compromising quality.

Best practices for risk management include regular reviews of the risk-based approach, client segmentation by risk, transaction monitoring automation, and staff training. This approach ensures not only compliance with new standards but also the long-term sustainability of the business.

AML and KYC: Comparison of the EU and CIS

Illustration for the section "AML and KYC: Comparison of the EU and CIS" in the article "New Requirements for KYC-AML Procedures in the EU and CIS from 2025"

In recent years, regulation in the field of AML and KYC has changed significantly, and comparing the approaches of the EU and CIS becomes especially relevant for financial organizations. Standards and practices for combating money laundering and customer identification form different requirements and procedures, affecting both day-to-day activities and strategic business decisions.

Differences in EU and CIS Legislation

Criterion EU (2025) CIS (2025)
KYC Procedures Unified standards, EDD, eKYC Variability, paper-based processes
Beneficiary Verification Full transparency, UBO registers Partial transparency
Transaction Monitoring Automation, AI, scoring Manual monitoring, selectively
Sanctions for Violations High fines, AMLA control Lower fines, local regulators
Digital Onboarding Standardized, eIDAS Partially implemented
Comparing EU and CIS requirements shows that companies operating in multiple markets must consider differences in approaches to customer due diligence, transaction monitoring, and sanctions for violations. The EU dominates in automation, transparency, and strict control, while the CIS displays variability in procedures and local regulatory features.

Harmonization of Standards and Business: What to Know

The harmonization of AML standards between the EU and CIS becomes a strategic task for international businesses. The role of FATF in unifying requirements, the introduction of regulatory sandboxes, and the development of cross-border operations open new opportunities for companies ready to invest in compliance.

COREDO’s experience shows that the implementation of KYC/AML in the B2B segment, company registration in Asia and Africa, as well as integration with international platforms, allows businesses not only to meet the requirements of different jurisdictions but also to increase investment attractiveness through transparency and sustainability of compliance processes.

Practical Recommendations for Business

Summary of Key Changes:

  • From 2025, KYC procedures in the EU and CIS require automation, the implementation of eKYC, digital onboarding, and continuous client monitoring.
  • EU AML requirements are tightened: 6AMLD, AMLR, new fines, a single agency AMLA, expanded reporting obligations.
  • The compliance officer becomes a key figure responsible for internal audit, whistleblowing implementation, and staff training.
  • Technologies (AI, machine learning, anti-fraud tools) allow cost optimization and increase compliance efficiency.

Checklist for Preparing a Company for New KYC/AML Standards:

  • Perform an audit of current KYC/AML procedures.
  • Implement digital onboarding and eKYC considering eIDAS requirements.
  • Update the policy for beneficiary verification and source of funds verification.
  • Automate transaction monitoring and integrate anti-fraud systems.
  • Appoint a compliance officer with expanded powers.
  • Ensure GDPR compliance in personal data processing.
  • Prepare the company for compliance audit and interaction with regulators.

Recommendations for Choosing Technologies and Partners:

  • Evaluate the ROI of implementing new AML/KYC platforms.
  • Use solutions supported by AI and automation.
  • Choose partners with experience in cross-jurisdictional compliance and deep knowledge of EU, CIS, Asia, and Africa legislation.

Advice on Reducing Risks and Costs:

  • Regularly review the risk-based approach and client segmentation.
  • Outsource some compliance functions to optimize costs.
  • Implement staff training and internal whistleblowing procedures.
COREDO’s practice confirms that timely adaptation to new KYC/AML standards is not only a regulatory requirement but a strategic asset for international business development. Readiness for changes, investment in technology, and partnership with COREDO experts will ensure your business’s sustainability and competitive advantage in the global market.
In 2025, Hong Kong continues to maintain its position as one of the most influential international financial centers. According to The Global Financial Centres Index, Hong Kong consistently ranks in the top 5 global jurisdictions for investment attractiveness, regulatory environment transparency, and financial stability. In less than two decades, the volume of foreign direct investment in Hong Kong has increased 3.5 times, and the number of new incorporated companies has exceeded 1.4 million, a clear indicator of trust from the global business community.

So why do entrepreneurs from Europe, Asia, and the CIS massively choose to register a company in Hong Kong? The key advantages are clear:

  • Free trade and absence of currency control: Hong Kong is a free port with no restrictions on capital movement, providing maximum flexibility for international settlements and multi-currency operations.
  • Strategic location: Geographically, Hong Kong is the ideal entry point to the Southeast Asian markets and Mainland China. Thanks to integration into regional trade-economic alliances, a company in Hong Kong gains barrier-free access to major Asian markets.
  • Global business integration: Hong Kong is a recognized international financial center, home to the largest global banks, funds, and payment systems. This ensures fast entry to global markets and easy integration into international holding structures.
  • Absence of VAT and customs duties: No VAT or customs fees are levied on the import and export of goods through Hong Kong, significantly reducing costs for exporters and importers.
COREDO’s practice confirms: these factors become decisive for clients seeking sustainable business development and risk diversification on an international level.

# Why starting a business in Hong Kong is profitable for exports and international operations

Illustration for the section "# Why starting a business in Hong Kong is profitable for exports and international operations" in the article "Why it is profitable to establish a company in Hong Kong"

Considering Hong Kong as a foothold for exporting to China and APEC countries, it is important to take into account its unique role in the global economy. Hong Kong is not only the “gateway to China” but also a free trade center with access to over 30 international free trade agreements.

For companies focused on export, registering a business in Hong Kong allows:

  • Minimizing logistics and customs clearance costs thanks to its free port status.
  • Utilizing international payment systems for instant settlements with partners worldwide.
  • Conducting multi-currency transactions without restrictions and additional conversion costs.
  • Participating in regional trade-economic alliances, facilitating access to Southeast Asian markets.

The COREDO team has implemented dozens of projects on integrating Hong Kong companies into holding structures, allowing our clients to optimize supply chains, reduce tax burdens, and enhance the transparency of international operations.

Hong Kong’s tax system and preferential taxation for foreign companies

Illustration for the section "Hong Kong

# Territorial taxation principle and tax rates

Illustration for the section "# Territorial taxation principle and tax rates" in the article "Why it is profitable to establish a company in Hong Kong"

One of the key reasons why registration of a company in Hong Kong is so in demand: the unique tax system based on the territorial principle. This means that only profits sourced from Hong Kong are taxable. Income from overseas operations is not taxed if the company can confirm their foreign origin.
Indicator Hong Kong Singapore Cyprus
Corporate tax rate 8.25% / 16.5% 17% 12.5%
VAT Absent 8% 19%
Customs duties No No Yes
Currency control No No No
Territorial taxation principle Yes Yes No
Double tax avoidance agreements 45+ 90+ 60+

For foreign companies, the following aspects are especially relevant:

  • Preferential taxation for non-residents: Profits from operations outside Hong Kong can be fully exempt from corporate tax.
  • Absence of VAT and customs duties: This reduces operating costs for companies engaged in international trade.
  • A network of double tax avoidance agreements (DTA): Over 45 agreements allow for tax optimization when dealing with foreign counterparts.
The solution developed at COREDO allows clients to build effective international tax planning schemes using the advantages of Hong Kong jurisdiction.

# How to optimize taxation through a Hong Kong company

Illustration for the section "# How to optimize taxation through a Hong Kong company" in the article "Why it is profitable to establish a company in Hong Kong"
COREDO’s experience has shown that taxation optimization through a company in Hong Kong is possible thanks to a combination of territorial principle, absence of currency control, and flexible economic substance requirements. For companies working with foreign clients, key tools include:

  • Structuring deals through an offshore in Hong Kong for tax benefits.
  • Using automatic exchange of tax information (CRS) to ensure transparency and compliance with international standards.
  • Implementing financial monitoring systems to control economic substance and confirm income sources.
COREDO’s practice confirms: competent tax planning not only reduces fiscal risks but also increases the investment appeal of a business for international partners.

Legal support in Hong Kong: corporate law, compliance and AML

Illustration for the section "Legal support in Hong Kong: corporate law, compliance and AML" in the article "Why it is profitable to establish a company in Hong Kong"

# Corporate law of Hong Kong and asset protection

Hong Kong corporate law is based on the principles of the British legal system, ensuring predictability, transparency, and a high level of property rights protection.

For foreign investors, this means:

  • Flexibility of corporate structure: The ability to use nominee service (nominee directors and shareholders), establish holding companies and manage assets remotely.
  • Transparency of the regulatory environment: All changes in company structure and beneficiary data are recorded in open registers, increasing trust from banks and partners.
  • Asset protection: Hong Kong’s legislation effectively protects property rights, and its judicial system is considered one of the most independent in Asia.
The COREDO team has repeatedly supported asset restructuring projects and integration of Hong Kong companies into international holding structures, allowing our clients to minimize legal risks and ensure long-term investment security.

# Compliance and AML in Hong Kong: requirements and best practices

In recent years, requirements for AML and compliance in Hong Kong have significantly tightened, related to global trends in combating money laundering and terrorist financing (FATF).

For new companies, this means the need for:

  • Pursuing strict KYC/AML procedures during registration and opening of bank accounts.
  • Conducting regular due diligence on beneficiaries, shareholders, and business partners.
  • Implementing internal compliance control policies and financial monitoring.
COREDO’s completed projects show: timely implementation of best AML and compliance practices allows not only to avoid fines and account blocks but also increase corporate transparency, which is critically important for working with international banks and investors.

Registration and incorporation procedure in Hong Kong: step-by-step guide 2025

# How to register a company in Hong Kong remotely

In 2025, the incorporation procedure in Hong Kong has become highly digitized. Remote company registration in Hong Kong is possible for non-residents, which is especially relevant for entrepreneurs from Europe and the CIS.

Main stages:

  1. Selection of corporate structure: Private Limited Company, the most popular form for international business.
  2. Preparation of incorporation documents: Charter, information about directors, shareholders, and beneficiaries.
  3. Appointment of a corporate secretary: A mandatory requirement for all companies.
  4. Application submission through the electronic Companies Registry portal: The entire procedure takes 1-3 business days.
  5. Using nominee service (if necessary): To ensure confidentiality and management of the corporate structure.
  6. Opening a corporate account: After obtaining the certificate of incorporation.
COREDO solutions enable clients to complete all stages remotely, including electronic document submission, beneficiary identification, and remote company management.

# Cost, timeframes, and registration features for non-residents

The cost of incorporating a company in Hong Kong for non-residents remains among the most competitive in the region.
On average, registration and legal support expenses range from 1,500 to 3,000 USD, including corporate secretary services and the preparation of all necessary documents. Registration timeframes are from 1 to 5 business days.

Features for non-residents:

  • Business immigration opportunity through Hong Kong upon meeting certain economic substance requirements.
  • Licensing of certain activities: Financial, insurance, crypto, and payment services require obtaining special licenses.
  • Flexibility of remote management: All corporate procedures can be implemented remotely, including holding meetings and signing documents.

Opening a bank account and financial support for a Hong Kong company

# How to open a Hong Kong bank account for a non-resident

opening a bank account in Hong Kong for non-residents requires careful preparation for KYC/AML procedures.

The bank requests:

  • Incorporation documents of the company.
  • Confirmation of ownership structure and beneficiaries.
  • Business plan and description of income sources.
  • Recommendations from partner banks (desirable).
The financial stability of Hong Kong and its developed network of international payment systems allow using multi-currency accounts, conducting international payments, and integrating the company into global settlement chains. COREDO’s practice shows: with proper document preparation and transparency of structure, an account is opened within 2-4 weeks.

# Financial reporting and audit: requirements for foreign companies

Companies in Hong Kong are required to annually submit financial reports and undergo an audit, regardless of the volume of operations.

Key requirements:

  • Corporate reporting must comply with international standards (IFRS).
  • Economic substance: It is necessary to confirm the reality of the business and the presence of business activity.
  • Features of bookkeeping: For companies with foreign capital, it is important to consider disclosure requirements of information on beneficiaries and ownership structure.
COREDO supports clients at all stages of report preparation, ensuring compliance with local and international standards.

Support programs for startups and small businesses in Hong Kong

# Startup ecosystem and access to venture capital

Hong Kong is one of Asia’s leading startup hubs. Here, programs for supporting small and medium-sized businesses, accelerators, venture funds, and government grants are actively developing.

Hong Kong’s startup ecosystem provides:

  • Access to venture capital and investment platforms.
  • Information and mentorship support for new projects.
  • Integration into international business communities and strategic partnerships with China.
COREDO’s experience shows: participating in acceleration programs and government grants allows startups to quickly scale and enter new markets.

# How to access support programs and grants

To access startup support programs in Hong Kong, it is necessary:

  • Register a company and confirm economic substance.
  • Prepare a business plan and apply for a program.
  • Pass selection into an accelerator or incubator.
COREDO assists clients at all stages – from document preparation to supporting negotiations with investors and government funds.

Risks and limitations of doing business in Hong Kong for foreign companies

# Legal and tax risks for international companies

Despite obvious advantages, registering a company in Hong Kong is associated with several legal and tax risks:
  • Automatic exchange of tax information (CRS): Companies are required to disclose information about beneficiaries and income sources.
  • Tightening of compliance and AML controls: Banks and regulators thoroughly check ownership structure and business activities.
  • Financial monitoring: Any suspicious transactions may lead to account freezing.
COREDO’s practice confirms: timely implementation of internal policies on risk management and transparency minimizes negative consequences.

# How to ensure activity transparency and business protection

To ensure corporate transparency and protect business in Hong Kong, it is important to:

  • Implement best compliance practices and conduct regular due diligence.
  • Use nominee service and corporate secretary to manage the structure.
  • Protect intellectual property and assets through registration of rights and implementation of internal control procedures.
COREDO supports clients in matters of business protection, corporate transparency, and legal risk management.

Practical steps and recommendations for registering and conducting business in Hong Kong

# Checklist for company registration and account opening

  • Determine legal structure and corporate model.
  • Prepare a package of incorporation documents.
  • Appoint a corporate secretary and, if necessary, use nominee service.
  • Undergo due diligence and KYC procedure.
  • Submit registration application through the electronic portal.
  • Open a bank account, providing justification of business model and income sources.
  • Organize bookkeeping and corporate reporting.
  • Implement internal compliance and AML control policies.

# Key findings and actionable advice for entrepreneurs

  • Tax optimization: Use the territorial taxation principle to minimize tax burden.
  • Risk minimization: Implement modern compliance and financial monitoring tools.
  • Choosing a legal partner: Entrust comprehensive legal support to experts with international experience.
COREDO’s practice shows: a systematic approach to registration and business support in Hong Kong not only reduces costs but also creates a sustainable platform for scaling in Asian and global markets.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) about registration and conducting business in Hong Kong

how to register a company in Hong Kong remotely?
The entire procedure is conducted through the electronic Companies Registry portal, documents are submitted online, and beneficiary identification is done remotely.
What taxes does a company in Hong Kong pay when working with foreign clients?
Profit earned outside Hong Kong is not taxed. Domestic profit is taxed at a rate of 8.25%/16.5%.
How to open a bank account for a Hong Kong company for a non-resident?
You’ll need to prepare incorporation documents, disclose ownership structure, undergo KYC/AML procedures, and justify the business model.
What compliance and AML risks exist for foreign company owners?
Main risks are related to automatic exchange of tax information, tightening KYC/AML procedures, and financial monitoring.
How to choose a legal structure for business in Hong Kong?
The most popular form is Private Limited Company, providing flexibility, asset protection, and the ability to integrate into international holding structures.
What are the requirements for corporate reporting and audit?
Annual financial reporting and mandatory audit according to IFRS standards regardless of the volume of operations.
What support programs are available for startups and small businesses?
Government grants, accelerators, venture funds, and mentorship programs are available for new companies registered in Hong Kong.
What are the timeframes and costs of incorporation for non-residents?
Timeframes range from 1 to 5 days, cost from 1,500 USD, including corporate secretary services and document preparation.
How to integrate a Hong Kong company into an international holding structure?
Possible through the creation of holding companies, using nominee service, and structuring asset ownership considering international tax agreements.
How to ensure the protection of intellectual property?
Registration of trademarks and patents, implementation of internal control procedures, and legal support at all stages.
COREDO: your strategic partner for building international business through Hong Kong. Our experience and expertise allow us to solve the most complex tasks, ensuring transparency, safety, and sustainable growth of your business in Asia and beyond.

In 2025, more than 70% of new European holding structures and investment companies choose Cyprus as their main jurisdiction for business registration. The reason is not only the attractive corporate taxation in Cyprus but also a unique combination of flexibility, transparency, and access to EU, Asian, and Middle Eastern markets.

However, behind this statistic lies another reality: according to international research, up to 40% of foreign investors face rejections in opening bank accounts, compliance delays, and errors in choosing company structure in Cyprus.
Why, despite the obvious advantages, does Company Registration in Cyprus become a challenge for experienced entrepreneurs? How to minimize risks, ensure AML/KYC compliance, and get the most out of the Cypriot jurisdiction?

In this article, I, Nikita Veremeev, share a practical step-by-step guide based on the experience of COREDO – from strategic structure selection to nuances of tax planning and asset protection. Read to the end to gain not just an action algorithm but strategic ideas that will help take your international business to a new level.

Company Registration in Cyprus: Main Steps and Requirements

Illustration for the section "Company Registration in Cyprus: Main Steps and Requirements" in the article "How to Register a Legal Entity in Cyprus — Step-by-Step Guide"

Choosing a Company Structure: LLC, Holding, or Branch

Key Step: determining the optimal corporate structure in Cyprus. In practice, the COREDO team has implemented projects for creating:

  • Limited Liability Company (LLC Cyprus) – a universal choice for trading, IT, and financial companies, as well as for international holdings.
  • Holding Company in Cyprus, a tool for owning assets, tax optimization, and intellectual property protection.
  • Branch of a Foreign Company: a solution for businesses wanting to maintain control of the main structure but gain access to EU benefits.
In 2025, substance requirements Cyprus have tightened: for recognition of economic presence (economic substance), it is required not only to have a real office and employees but also to confirm the managerial function in Cyprus. COREDO’s practice confirms: ignoring these requirements leads to the loss of tax benefits and the risk of the company being reclassified as an offshore in Cyprus.

Requirements for Founders, Directors, and Corporate Secretary

To register a company in Cyprus, you need:

  • At least one director (can be non-resident, but a Cypriot is recommended for substance).
  • One shareholder (individual or legal entity; nominee service Cyprus is allowed).
  • Corporate Secretary Cyprus: a mandatory figure responsible for corporate governance and interaction with regulators.
Special attention is paid to ultimate beneficial owner (UBO) disclosure Cyprus: since 2023, the Cypriot register of shareholders and beneficiaries is open to regulators and banks. A solution developed by COREDO allows structuring UBO disclosure in accordance with international KYC/AML standards in Cyprus and automatic exchange of tax information (CRS) requirements.

Preparation of Founding Documents and Confirmation of Legal Address

The set of founding documents Cyprus includes:

  • Charter (Memorandum & Articles of Association).
  • Affidavit of a Cypriot lawyer, notarized confirmation of document compliance.
  • Confirmation of legal address in Cyprus (lease agreement, utility bill).
Since 2024, electronic submission of documents Cyprus speeds up the registration process; however, COREDO’s practice has shown: for non-residents, it is critical to properly complete due diligence Cyprus and provide an extended set of supporting documents.

Step-by-Step Guide for Registering a Legal Entity in Cyprus

Illustration for the section "Step-by-Step Guide for Registering a Legal Entity in Cyprus" in the article "How to Register a Legal Entity in Cyprus — Step-by-Step Guide"

Step 1: Reserving and Approving the Company Name

The first step is checking the uniqueness and reserving the name in the Cyprus company register (Department of Registrar of Companies and Intellectual Property). The name should reflect the field of activity and not duplicate existing brands. For certain sectors, approval from relevant regulators is required.

Step 2: Preparing and Submitting a Document Package to the Company Register

The package includes:

  • Founding documents Cyprus.
  • Affidavit of a Cypriot lawyer.
  • Confirmation of legal address Cyprus.
  • KYC questionnaires for all directors and shareholders.
Electronic submission of documents Cyprus allows for expedited consideration, but non-residents often require personal presence or notarization of documents in their country of residence.

Step 3: Obtaining a Certificate of Registration and Mandatory Certificates

After approval, the following are issued:

  • Certificate of Incorporation in Cyprus.
  • Certificate of Directors and Shareholders.
  • Proof of Registered Address.
These documents are necessary to open a bank account and further licensing activities in Cyprus.

Step 4: Obtaining a Tax Number (TIN) and VAT Registration

To conduct business in Cyprus, the company is required to obtain a Cyprus tax number (TIN) from the tax service and, upon reaching the turnover threshold, register as a VAT payer.

Our experience at COREDO has shown: timely VAT registration in Cyprus is critical for VAT refund and building a transparent scheme of tax residency for a company in Cyprus.

Step 5: Opening a Bank Account for the Company in Cyprus

The process of opening a bank account in Cyprus requires undergoing multi-level KYC and AML procedures. Cyprus international banking requirements involve providing a complete set of corporate documents, proof of source of funds, and a business plan.

COREDO’s practice confirms: for non-residents and new companies, banks may request additional documents, including affidavits, recommendations, and confirmation of substance. It is important to prepare a compliance package in advance to avoid delays.

Step 6: Additional Licenses and Permits (by Type of Activity)

For financial, crypto-, forex, and payment companies, specialized licenses in Cyprus are required (CySEC, Central Bank of Cyprus, etc.). The COREDO team has supported clients in obtaining licenses in the fields of investment services, EMI, PSP, and crypto-assets, ensuring full compliance with international AML/KYC standards and economic presence requirements.

Compliance, AML, and KYC: Key Requirements for Companies in Cyprus

Illustration for the section "Compliance, AML, and KYC: Key Requirements for Companies in Cyprus" in the article "How to Register a Legal Entity in Cyprus — Step-by-Step Guide"

Economic Presence (Substance) and New Requirements for 2025

As of 2025, substance requirements Cyprus include:

  • The presence of a real office and employees in Cyprus.
  • Actual management of the company from the Cyprus territory.
  • Maintaining corporate accounting Cyprus and conducting audits.
The solution developed by COREDO provides a comprehensive economic presence check, allowing the company to avoid reclassification to offshore in Cyprus and retain tax benefits for companies in Cyprus.

Disclosure of Ultimate Beneficiaries (UBO) and Shareholder Register

Ultimate Beneficial Owner (UBO) disclosure Cyprus has become mandatory for all companies. Beneficial ownership data is entered into the Cyprus shareholder register and is accessible to regulators, banks, and, in certain cases, international authorities under CRS. The COREDO team has implemented projects for ownership structuring in compliance with GDPR requirements and privacy protection.

Taxation and Reporting for Companies in Cyprus

Illustration for the section "Taxation and Reporting for Companies in Cyprus" in the article "How to Register a Legal Entity in Cyprus — Step-by-Step Guide"

Corporate Taxes, Benefits, and Obligations

Corporate taxation Cyprus: one of the most attractive in the EU:

  • Standard corporate tax rate: 12.5%.
  • Tax benefits for Cyprus companies engaged in holding activities, intellectual property, and international trade business.
  • Absence of tax on dividends for non-residents when substance is complied with.
However, the tax obligations of holding companies in Cyprus include submitting annual reports, paying corporate levies and fees, and complying with cross-border taxation requirements Cyprus.

Accounting, Auditing, and Automatic Information Exchange (CRS)

All companies are required to maintain accounting records, undergo annual audits, and submit reports and audits for companies in Cyprus. As of 2024, the automatic exchange of tax information (CRS) Cyprus covers all companies with foreign beneficiaries: this requires special attention to the transparency of the corporate structure and the proper handling of corporate reporting.

Practical Aspects: Cost, Timing, Typical Mistakes, and Risks

Illustration for the section "Practical Aspects: Cost, Timing, Typical Mistakes, and Risks" in the article "How to Register a Legal Entity in Cyprus — Step-by-Step Guide"

Comparison Table: Cost, Timing, and Registration Features for Residents and Non-residents

Parameter Residents Non-residents
Registration Time 10-15 working days 12-20 working days
Cost (approx.) from €2000 from €2500
Required Documents standard package + address confirmation, due diligence
Restrictions minimal additional KYC/AML checks

Main Risks and How to Avoid Them

Key Risks:

  • Errors in choosing the company structure in Cyprus and non-compliance with substance requirements Cyprus.
  • Insufficient preparation for due diligence Cyprus and UBO disclosure.
  • Compliance and AML violations in Cyprus: reasons for bank account rejection or operation blocking.
COREDO’s practice has shown: minimizing risks is achieved through early auditing of the corporate structure, preparing a full compliance package, and supporting the registration of a company in Cyprus by a professional team.

Business Scaling and Asset Protection through a Cypriot Company

Opportunities for International Business and Tax Burden Optimization

Cyprus: an ideal platform for international tax planning, business scaling, and EU market entry. The use of holding structures, registration of intellectual property in Cyprus, and application of tax benefits for Cyprus companies allow legal tax burden optimization and asset protection.

Protection of Intellectual Property and Assets

Registration of intellectual property in Cyprus ensures international legal protection, and the structuring of assets through a Cypriot company effectively safeguards against risks and claims. Solutions implemented by the COREDO team include creating holding companies, trusts, and implementing nominee service Cyprus to enhance business confidentiality and security.

Key Conclusions and Practical Recommendations for Entrepreneurs

  • Company registration in Cyprus: it is not only access to EU markets but also a tool for effective tax planning, asset protection, and business scaling.
  • It is critically important to correctly choose the company structure, ensure compliance with substance requirements Cyprus, and prepare a complete package of documents for due diligence Cyprus.
  • For successful bank account opening and obtaining licenses in Cyprus, impeccable compliance and AML preparation is necessary, as well as UBO disclosure in accordance with international standards.
  • Supporting company registration in Cyprus by an experienced team allows minimizing risks, avoiding common mistakes, and ensuring long-term protection of business interests.
The COREDO team is ready to become your strategic partner at every stage: from choosing the structure and registering the company in Cyprus to comprehensive legal support, licensing, and building an effective corporate governance system.
In 2025, the European payment services market found itself at the center of seismic shifts: according to the European Central Bank, in just the last year, the share of non-bank payment service providers (NB-PSPs) in cross-border transactions grew by 27%, and the volume of funds placed in safeguarding accounts exceeded €100 billion for the first time. But behind this growth lies a new reality: the enactment of Regulation (EU) 2024/886 and accompanying ECB rules, already described as the most stringent regulatory challenge for the fintech industry in recent years.

Why such ambitious reforms? The regulator aims not only to enhance financial stability and transparency of Eurosystem payment systems but also to level the playing field between banks and NB-PSPs, tightening requirements for access, fund storage, and AML compliance. However, for most non-bank players, these changes do not just present new tasks but a real stress test for business models and operational processes.

Are you ready for NB-PSP fund storage limits at central banks to be monitored in real time, and new compliance requirements violations to lead to instant financial sanctions and even expulsion from payment system? How to avoid the traps of Regulation (EU) 2024/886 and turn new challenges into strategic opportunities?
In this article, I, Nikita Veremeev, founder of COREDO, share practical case studies, adaptation strategies, and expert analysis of new ECB rules — so you not only survive but strengthen your position in the new competitive environment. Read to the end: here you will find not only risk analysis but also step-by-step recommendations, proven in practice by our team.

Regulation (EU) 2024/886 for NB-PSPs

Illustration for the section "Regulation (EU) 2024/886 for NB-PSPs" in the article "ECB’s New Rules- A Nightmare for NB-PSPs"

Regulation (EU) 2024/886 for NB-PSPs fundamentally changes the rules of participation for non-credit payment organizations in the EU payment infrastructure. Now NB-PSPs can gain direct access to the TARGET system, creating new opportunities for competition and innovation in the payment market. Below are the key access criteria for NB-PSP to TARGET under this regulation.

NB-PSP Access Criteria to TARGET

Regulation (EU) 2024/886 introduces unified access standards for non-bank payment organizations to key Eurosystem infrastructures, including TARGET and related settlement systems. Now NB-PSPs, electronic money institutions (EMIs), and payment institutions (PIs) can apply for direct TARGET system access if they meet objective admission criteria: having a license in one of the EU countries, demonstrating robust IT infrastructure, and a transparent ownership structure.
Implementation of non-discriminatory access means that banks and NB-PSPs are formally equal in rights, but in practice, non-bank players must undergo a more complex due diligence procedure, including an assessment of operational risks, AML/KYC requirements, and compliance monitoring. Our experience at COREDO shows that successfully gaining access to central bank accounts requires not only legal preparation but also a deep understanding of the specifics of the Settlement Finality Directive (SFD) and integration with Eurosystem payment systems.

Fund Storage Restrictions and Safeguarded Accounts

One of the most sensitive innovations: strict restrictions on client fund storage in central bank accounts. Regulation (EU) 2024/886 establishes limits, the excess of which is automatically recorded in real time. For NB-PSPs, this means the need for constant monitoring of volumes in safeguarding accounts and the implementation of automated monitoring systems.

COREDO has repeatedly encountered cases where international NB-PSPs, entering the EU market, underestimated requirements for safeguarding client funds. A solution developed by our team includes the integration of compliance monitoring modules and regular audits, allowing risks of limit violations to be timely identified and the likelihood of sanctions minimized.

Therefore, implementing an effective client fund storage control system becomes critically important, especially in the context of potential access restrictions or exclusion of NB-PSPs from payment systems, which are detailed further.

Exclusion from Payment Systems: Conditions and Sanctions

The new ECB rules provide clearly defined financial sanctions for NB-PSPs for violations of fund storage limits and other compliance requirements. In some cases, expulsion from the payment system is possible — exclusion from TARGET or other key infrastructures, effectively meaning loss of access to the EU market.

COREDO’s practice confirms: to minimize the risk of fines and exclusion, it is crucial not only to comply with the limits but also to document all actions concerning safeguarding funds, maintain transparent reporting, and regularly interact with national regulators. Otherwise, even a single violation can lead to multimillion financial penalties and operational blockage.

Risks for Non-Bank Payment Organizations

Illustration for the section "Risks for Non-Bank Payment Organizations" in the article "ECB’s New Rules- A Nightmare for NB-PSPs"
Risks for non-bank payment organizations are becoming an increasingly relevant topic amidst their growing role in the financial system. Regulatory peculiarities, technological, and operational challenges form a complex of factors that can affect the stability of such companies: let’s examine key risks and their consequences in more detail.

Consequences of Fund Storage Limit Violations

Violations of central bank account fund storage limits are now automatically recorded, and sanctions can be applied without prior notification. For NB-PSPs, this means not only financial losses but also reputational risks and the threat of expulsion from the payment system. In one COREDO case, a client faced operational blockage after exceeding the limit by just 2%, necessitating the urgent implementation of an automatic monitoring system and a review of internal procedures.

AML/KYC Risks for NB-PSP After 2025

Regulation (EU) 2024/886 and new ECB standards tighten AML compliance requirements for payment organizations. Now NB-PSPs are obliged not only to implement a risk-based approach to client identification but also to ensure continuous compliance monitoring, integrating processes with national and European registries. Special attention is given to crypto-asset service providers (CASPs), for whom AML/KYC requirements become even stricter.

The COREDO team implemented a comprehensive strategy for a major NB-PSP, including regular internal audits, staff training, and process automation for client verification. This approach not only meets new requirements but also reduces operational risks.

IT Risks and Infrastructure Requirements

The implementation of new ECB rules requires NB-PSPs to modernize their IT infrastructure, integrate fraud prevention technologies, and ensure the uninterrupted operation of safeguarding accounts. Special attention is given to cybersecurity, data protection, and compatibility with instant payments infrastructure.

In COREDO’s practice, cases were reported where insufficient IT system readiness led to settlement delays and even temporary suspension of TARGET access. Therefore, we recommend regular infrastructure testing and investing in modern compliance monitoring solutions.

NB-PSP Adaptation to Regulation (EU) 2024/886

Illustration for the section "NB-PSP Adaptation to Regulation (EU) 2024/886" in the article "ECB’s New Rules- A Nightmare for NB-PSPs"
Adapting NB-PSP to Regulation (EU) 2024/886 requires implementing new procedures and revising existing practices to comply with European standards for payment services provision. Special attention is paid to risk management and ensuring effective client fund protection, which becomes a central element amidst the tightening regulation and responsibility of payment service providers.

Risk Management and Client Fund Protection

Effective safeguarding account management is a key element of the adaptation strategy. The COREDO team recommends implementing automated limit control systems integrated with internal and external registries, as well as conducting regular stress tests of operational processes. This approach allows timely identification of potential violations and risk minimization of sanctions.

In one of COREDO’s projects for a European NB-PSP, an automatic notification system about approaching the fund storage limit was implemented, allowing the client to avoid fines and maintain regulator trust.

Moving on to legal support issues for NB-PSP in Europe, it is important to consider the specifics of local regulation and compliance requirements.

Legal Support for NB-PSP in Europe

Legal support becomes a critical success factor for NB-PSPs entering the EU market or expanding their activities. Licensing NB-PSPs in the EU requires a deep understanding not only of Regulation (EU) 2024/886 and PSD2 but also of the specifics of interacting with national regulators.
COREDO’s experience shows that regular legal audits, preparation for inspections, and support during the licensing process help not only minimize compliance risks but also expedite entry into new markets.

Instant Payments: Integration and Innovation

Instant payment infrastructure is becoming the standard for the European market, and integration with instant payments regulation opens new opportunities for fintech companies. For NB-PSPs, this means the need to modernize IT systems, implement new security protocols, and train staff.

COREDO developed a phased integration strategy for instant payments for one of its clients, considering ECB and national regulator requirements, which not only increased transaction speed but also strengthened competitive market positions.

New ECB Rules and EU Fintech

Illustration for the section "New ECB Rules and EU Fintech" in the article "ECB’s New Rules- A Nightmare for NB-PSPs"
New ECB rules and EU fintech initiatives fundamentally change the financial services landscape, setting stricter requirements for innovations, security, and regulation of digital payments. In this context, understanding how the new standards affect the operations of traditional banks and non-bank fintech companies, as well as their differences, becomes particularly important.

Banks and NB-PSP: What’s the Difference?

Regulation (EU) 2024/886 formally equalizes the rights of banks and NB-PSPs to payment system access, but in practice, differences in capital adequacy requirements, operational reserves, and compliance monitoring remain. This creates new barriers for non-bank players, but also stimulates innovation and the development of open banking.

COREDO notes that NB-PSPs investing in process digitalization and digital euro integration gain a competitive edge through speed and flexibility in client servicing.

NB-PSP Prospects in Asia and Africa

The influence of new ECB rules extends beyond the EU: NB-PSPs planning expansion into Asian and African countries face the need to adapt business processes to varying compliance and fund safeguarding standards. COREDO’s experience in supporting cross-border payments shows that a successful market entry strategy requires not only legal support but also a deep understanding of local regulatory requirements.

In a recent case, COREDO’s team provided comprehensive support to an NB-PSP launching operations in Singapore and Dubai, integrating European AML/KYC and safeguarding accounts standards with local requirements.
This approach allows companies to minimize regulatory risks and ensure sustainable development when entering new markets.

Practical Advice for NB-PSP and Business

Risk/Requirement Practical Solution Responsible Department
Fund Storage Limits Implementation of Automatic Monitoring Financial/IT
AML/KYC Compliance Audit and Staff Training Legal/Compliance
Instant Payment Integration IT Infrastructure Modernization IT/Operational
Interaction with Regulators Regular Consultations with Lawyers Management/Legal

COREDO’s practice shows that effective adaptation to Regulation (EU) 2024/886 requires a systematic approach:

  • Analyze new compliance requirements and integrate them into business processes.
  • Implement automated compliance monitoring and limit control systems.
  • Organize regular internal and external audits, including preparation for inspections by national and European regulators.
  • Invest in employee training on AML/KYC requirements and risk-based approach.
  • Modernize IT infrastructure for integration with instant payment infrastructure and fraud prevention.
  • Maintain constant dialogue with regulators and participate in industry initiatives for developing unified access standards.

Conclusions and Recommendations for Business

Illustration for the section "Conclusions and Recommendations for Business" in the article "ECB’s New Rules- A Nightmare for NB-PSPs"
The implementation of Regulation (EU) 2024/886 and new ECB rules: is not just another wave of regulation, but a fundamental transformation of the competitive environment for NB-PSPs. The tightening of requirements for safeguarding accounts, fund storage limits, and AML compliance calls for strategic re-evaluation of business models, investments in IT, and legal expertise by entrepreneurs and top managers.

COREDO’s experience confirms: those who perceive new rules as an opportunity for development rather than a threat gain access to new markets, strengthen customer and partner trust, and minimize risks of financial sanctions and expulsion from the payment system.

I recommend using this period of change for comprehensive process diagnostics, implementing modern compliance monitoring tools, and building partnerships with regulators. Only then can NB-PSPs not only comply with Regulation (EU) 2024/886 but also become leaders in the new fintech ecosystem of Europe and the world.

In 2024, Germany confidently entered the top 5 European countries in terms of the number of new foreign companies: over the past 12 months alone, more than 77,000 new legal entities with foreign participation were registered. This figure is not just statistics but a direct reflection of the attractiveness of the German jurisdiction for international business. Why has company registration in Germany become a strategic choice for entrepreneurs from the EU, Asia, and CIS?

On one hand, Germany offers a unique combination of a transparent legal environment, access to the largest EU market, and a developed startup support infrastructure. On the other hand, strict regulatory requirements, a complex licensing system, and high costs for business support often become barriers to market entry, especially for small and medium businesses. How to start a business in Germany with minimal costs without losing legality and reputation? What pitfalls await foreigners when setting up a company in Germany, and how to avoid common mistakes?

Me: Nikita Veremeev, CEO and founder of COREDO. In 8 years, the COREDO team has completed over 350 projects on company registration in Germany, the Czech Republic, the UK, Estonia, Singapore, and Dubai. In this article, I share not only a structured step-by-step guide but also practical recommendations that will help you go from choosing the form of ownership to cost optimization and integration into the European market. If you are looking for real experience, proven solutions, and strategic ideas: I recommend reading the material to the end.

Company Registration in Germany: Main Stages and Minimal Costs

Illustration for the section "Company Registration in Germany: Main Stages and Minimal Costs" in the article "How to Register a Company in Germany with Minimal Costs"

Starting a business in Germany for foreigners is not only a legal procedure but also a strategic project that requires careful preparation and a deep understanding of local realities. COREDO’s practice confirms: minimal costs for company registration in Germany are possible only with competent planning and strict adherence to the stages.

Choosing the Form of Ownership: GmbH, UG, AG, Which is Cheaper and Easier for Small Businesses

Choosing the legal form is a key stage determining not only the cost of opening a firm in Germany but also the requirements for share capital, management structure, and tax burden. The most popular forms are:
Form of Ownership Minimum Share Capital Main Costs Features
GmbH €25,000 Registration fees, notary, document translation Optimal for small and medium businesses, capital can be paid in stages
UG (Mini-GmbH) from €1 Similar to GmbH but lower capital Requires annual profit reservation up to €25,000
AG €50,000 High audit and management costs Suitable for large businesses and attracting investments
COREDO’s experience shows that for small businesses and startups, the optimal form remains GmbH or UG. GmbH (Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung) provides a balance between reputation, flexibility, and asset protection, while UG allows starting almost without capital investment but imposes restrictions on profit distribution.

Step-by-Step Guide to Registering a GmbH: How to Open a Firm with Minimal Expenses

The step-by-step guide to registering a GmbH includes the following stages:

  1. Choosing and Reserving a Name: Check uniqueness and reserve through the online portal Handelsregister.
  2. Preparation of Constitutive Documents (Gesellschaftsvertrag): Develop a founding agreement considering the specifics of the activity.
  3. Notarization of Documents: All founding documents must be certified by a German notary.
  4. Opening a Corporate Account in a German Bank: Deposit share capital and obtain confirmation for the trade register.
  5. Registration in the Trade Register (Handelsregister): Electronic submission of documents, payment of registration fees.
  6. Obtaining a Tax Number (Steuernummer) and VAT Number: Register with the tax office and get an identification number for VAT.
  7. Registration with the Chamber of Industry and Commerce: Payment of annual contributions and integration into the business community.
A solution developed by COREDO allows optimizing this process through digital tools, electronic document management, and remote interaction with notaries and banks.

Minimum Share Capital and Its Optimization: How Much Needs to Be Invested Initially

The minimum share capital for registering a GmbH in Germany is €25,000, of which at least €12,500 must be deposited at registration. The remaining amount can be contributed later as the business grows. For UG, €1 is sufficient; however, 25% of the net profits must be reserved annually until reaching €25,000.
COREDO’s team recommends using staged capital contributions and choosing banks offering preferential conditions for startups, which significantly reduces initial costs. It’s important to note: the share capital must be placed in a separate business bank account, and its use before registration is prohibited.

The Cost of Opening a Firm in Germany: Mandatory and Hidden Costs

The cost of opening a firm in Germany consists of:

  • Registration fees (from €150 to €400 depending on the region)
  • Notarial services (from €500 to €1,200)
  • Translation and legalization of documents (from €300)
  • Opening a corporate account (from €100)
  • Annual contributions to the chamber of industry and commerce (from €150)
  • Legal address (from €50 per month)
COREDO’s experience shows: cost optimization is possible by choosing a region with minimal fees, using electronic services, and startup partnership programs.

How to Reduce Costs for Business Registration in Germany: Practical Tips

Illustration for the section "How to Reduce Costs for Business Registration in Germany: Practical Tips" in the article "How to Register a Company in Germany with Minimal Costs"

Opening a business in Germany with minimal costs is an achievable task if modern tools are used and regional peculiarities are taken into account.

Choosing a Region and Online Registration: Where It Is Cheaper and Faster to Open a Business

The cost of registering a company in Germany depends on the federal state. For example, in Berlin and Leipzig, registration fees and legal address costs are lower than in Munich or Frankfurt. Online registration of a company in Germany through specialized platforms can reduce the timeframe from 4–6 weeks to 7–10 days and lower logistics and notary service costs.
In practice, COREDO has implemented projects where choosing a region and online document submission saved up to 30% of the startup budget.

Outsourcing Accounting and Legal Services: When Is It Beneficial?

Outsourcing accounting and legal support for a business in Germany is an effective way to reduce ongoing expenses and ensure compliance with international reporting standards (IFRS). For small businesses, it’s more beneficial to outsource financial record-keeping, tax declaration preparation, and annual balance than to maintain a full-time accountant.
COREDO’s outsourcing solutions allow clients to save up to 40% on administrative and tax expenses while minimizing the risk of penalties for reporting violations.

Optimizing Tax Burden and Obtaining Benefits for New Companies

Proper tax planning in Germany starts with choosing the optimal taxation system and timely registration of the tax number (Steuernummer). New companies and startups may be eligible for tax benefits, subsidies, and grants, especially in innovative and technological sectors.
COREDO’s experience shows: integration into European business associations and participation in startup support programs not only reduce the tax burden but also expedite market entry into the EU.

Documents and Licenses for Opening a Business in Germany: What a Foreigner Will Need

Illustration for the section "Documents and Licenses for Opening a Business in Germany: What a Foreigner Will Need" in the article "How to Register a Company in Germany with Minimal Costs"

Business in Germany for foreigners requires special attention to document preparation and adherence to migration requirements.

What Documents Are Needed to Register a GmbH in Germany

To register a GmbH, the following are necessary:

  • Constitutive documents (Gesellschaftsvertrag)
  • Certified copies of passports of founders and directors
  • Confirmation of the company’s legal address
  • Bank confirmation of share capital deposit
  • Application for registration in the trade register (Handelsregister)
All documents must be translated into German and notarized. COREDO’s team facilitates the legalization and translation of founding documents, speeding up registration and reducing refusal risks.

Obtaining Licenses and Permits: Specifics for Different Types of Activities

Certain types of businesses in Germany require special licenses: financial, insurance, cryptocurrency, payment, as well as permits for commercial real estate. Compliance (AML/KYC) and banking compliance for non-residents play an important role.
COREDO’s practice confirms: preliminary due diligence and preparation for AML checks speed up license acquisition and prevent account blockages.

Opening a Checking Account in a German Bank: Requirements and Pitfalls

Opening a checking account in a German bank is one of the most challenging stages for foreigners. Banks require confirmation of fund sources, a business plan, and the passing of KYC and AML procedures. Additional documents are often requested: tax residency certificates, corporate structures, and confirmation of business reputation.
COREDO’s team has developed interaction algorithms with banks that increase the likelihood of opening a corporate account in a European bank even for non-residents, minimizing refusal risks.

Legal Support for Business in Germany: How to Avoid Mistakes and Penalties

Illustration for the section "Legal Support for Business in Germany: How to Avoid Mistakes and Penalties" in the article "How to Register a Company in Germany with Minimal Costs"

Reliable legal support for business in Germany: a guarantee of long-term stability and investment protection.

AML/KYC Compliance: How to Ensure Conformity and Avoid Account Blockages

Adherence to AML/KYC requirements is a mandatory condition for opening a business in Germany and accessing banking services. Financial transaction monitoring, implementation of internal control procedures, and employee training in international reporting standards (IFRS), all minimize the risk of account blockages and penalties.
COREDO’s team implements comprehensive compliance solutions tailored to the client’s activity specifics and German regulatory requirements.

Common Mistakes in Business Registration and Operations: How to Avoid Them

Frequent mistakes include incorrect preparation of founding documents, untimely reporting submission, neglecting corporate governance and due diligence requirements. Such errors lead to penalties, account blockages, and loss of business reputation.
COREDO’s recommendations: use professional legal consultations for business, regularly conduct audits of corporate procedures, and monitor legislative changes.

Scaling and ROI: How to Assess the Effectiveness of Business Registration in Germany

Illustration for the section "Scaling and ROI: How to Assess the Effectiveness of Business Registration in Germany" in the article "How to Register a Company in Germany with Minimal Costs"

Company registration in Germany is an investment, the effectiveness of which is determined not only by initial costs but also by the opportunities for scaling to EU markets.

How to Calculate the Payback Period (ROI) When Opening a Company in Germany

To calculate the ROI of business registration in Germany, consider:

  • Cost of opening a firm (registration fees, notary, support services)
  • Annual expenses (accounting services, fees, taxes)
  • Expected revenues and tax benefits
  • Potential subsidies and grants
COREDO’s experience shows: the average payback period for small businesses is 12–24 months with proper financial accounting and tax burden optimization.

Opportunities for Business Scaling to EU Markets and International Agreements

Germany is an ideal entry point for scaling a business in the EU due to international agreements to avoid double taxation, the ability to register branches, and integration into European business associations. Company registration in Germany opens access to major markets, facilitates license acquisition, and simplifies labor migration of employees.
COREDO’s team supports clients at all stages of scaling: from branch registration to European market integration and international tax optimization.

Key Takeaways and Practical Recommendations for Entrepreneurs

Company registration in Germany: a strategic step requiring an expert approach and deep understanding of local realities. Practical steps verified by COREDO:

  • Choose the optimal form of ownership (GmbH or UG) to minimize startup costs.
  • Use online registration and choose regions with low fees.
  • Outsource accounting and legal support to reduce ongoing expenses.
  • Implement modern compliance (AML/KYC) and financial accounting tools.
  • Conduct regular due diligence and monitor legislative changes.
  • Utilize tax benefits, subsidies, and grants for new companies.
  • Plan scaling to EU markets, considering international agreements and integration into business associations.
COREDO’s experience shows: only a comprehensive approach, process transparency, and professional support at all stages allow opening a business in Germany with minimal costs and maximum efficiency. If you are seeking a reliable partner for company registration in Germany and further support, COREDO’s team is ready to offer solutions proven by international practice.

# Digital Banks: What Are They and Can Businesses Trust Them in the EU, Asia, and Africa

Digital Bank – What It Is and How It Differs

Illustration for the section "Digital Bank - What It Is and How It Differs" in the article "Digital Banks - What Are They and Can They Be Trusted"

In 2024, more than 70% of corporate clients in Europe and Asia have used digital bank services at least once, and the volume of international B2B payments through digital banks has exceeded $2 trillion – such data is published by McKinsey. But what lies behind this rapid growth? Why is digital banking becoming not just an alternative but often the only effective tool for international business? And the main question, can digital banks be trusted with corporate finances, compliance, and business scaling across different jurisdictions?
The world of banking technology is changing faster than ever. Digital banks are not just online banks but entire digital ecosystems integrated with SaaS solutions, open banking APIs, and digital signatures. At COREDO, we see that for international companies, a digital bank becomes a strategic partner capable of providing not only speed but also transparency, control, and compliance with regulatory requirements in the EU, Asia, and Africa.

Reading the article to the end means obtaining a practical guide on selecting, implementing, and safely using digital banks for your business, based on real cases and COREDO’s experience.

Types of Digital Banks: Neo, Challenger, Platform

In modern practice, there are three main models of digital banks:

  • Neo-bank, a fully digital structure without physical branches, operating on its own or partner license. Example: N26 (Germany), Revolut (United Kingdom). For COREDO clients, a neo-bank often becomes an optimal choice for quickly opening multi-currency accounts and integration with digital platforms for B2B.
  • Challenger bank, a digital bank that competes with traditional banks through innovative services and flexibility. Often has its own banking license and developed digital infrastructure. In COREDO cases, such banks are used for servicing international holding structures and startups.
  • Platform bank, a digital bank that provides API interfaces for integration with ERP, CRM, and other corporate systems. This solution is chosen by companies for which automation of KYC/AML, electronic identification of beneficiaries, and a digital compliance officer are important.

Thus, the choice of a digital bank model directly depends on business tasks and the expected level of digital integration: further, we will explain how a digital bank works in practice.

Digital Bank: How It Works

Digital bank is based on the digital transformation of banking processes:

  • API integration for business allows instant connectivity of banking services to ERP, accounting, and e-commerce platforms.
  • Electronic documents and digital signatures ensure the legal significance of remote operations.
  • Open banking (open banking API) provides the ability to manage accounts and transactions through third-party applications, increasing flexibility and transparency.
  • Digital ecosystem of digital banks includes multi-currency accounts, digital wallets, KYC/AML automation, and SaaS solutions for banks.
COREDO’s practice confirms modern digital banks can provide a full cycle of business services – from legal entity registration to complex compliance and international transfers.

Benefits of Digital Banks for Business

Illustration for the section "Benefits of Digital Banks for Business" in the article "Digital Banks - What Are They and Can They Be Trusted"
The benefits of digital banks for business manifest not only in the speed and convenience of working with finances but also in a wide range of additional services that simplify business operations and open up new opportunities for companies of all scales. Below we will analyze how these advantages are implemented in practice, starting, for example, with the process of opening an account for an international company.

Let’s take a closer look at how exactly the account opening process becomes easier and more accessible thanks to digital solutions.

Opening an Account for an International Company

One of the key requests from COREDO clients is the quick opening of a business account in a digital bank in the EU or Asia. Unlike traditional banks, a digital bank offers:
  • Remote verification and electronic identification (eID), the KYC process takes 1 to 3 days, and full digital client onboarding allows for opening a corporate account without visiting a branch.
  • Accessibility for international companies and non-residents, including startups, IT companies, and e-commerce businesses, as confirmed by COREDO’s experience in registering legal entities through a digital bank in the Czech Republic, Estonia, Singapore, and the United Kingdom.
  • Multi-currency accounts and digital wallets, which are particularly in demand for cross-border payments and currency operations.

Automation in Digital Banking: How to Scale?

A digital bank becomes a catalyst for business scaling:

  • Integration with ERP and accounting systems allows automating financial processes, reducing manual labor costs, and increasing transparency.
  • SaaS solutions and digital platforms for B2B enable rapid service connectivity, corporate card management, and tax reporting optimization.
  • In COREDO cases, scaling business with digital banking was accompanied by an increase in ROI due to reduced compliance time and accelerated international transfers.

Transparency and Control of Operations

A digital bank provides:

  • Instant currency operations and international transfers with transparent commissions and digital signatures.
  • Open banking and electronic documents allow controlling all transactions in real-time, integrating data with ERP and CRM.
  • KYC/AML automation reduces risks and accelerates compliance procedures.
Our experience at COREDO shows: the transparency and control provided by digital banks become critical for companies with distributed structures and international operations.

Security of Digital Banks and Risks

Illustration for the section "Security of Digital Banks and Risks" in the article "Digital Banks - What Are They and Can They Be Trusted"

The security of digital banks and risks are becoming more relevant as more financial operations transition to the online environment. Today, digital banks face new challenges in data protection and cyber threat prevention, requiring the implementation of modern technologies and constant monitoring of potential vulnerabilities.

Cybersecurity in Digital Bank

The question of trust in digital banks is directly related to security:

  • Cybersecurity in digital banking is based on biometric authentication, anti-fraud systems, and machine learning for AML.
  • GDPR and data protection, digital banks in the EU and the United Kingdom are required to comply with the strictest standards for personal data storage and processing.
  • Electronic signatures and digital identification provide legal force to remote operations.
COREDO has implemented projects where the introduction of digital banks reduced fraud incidents by 40% through the integration of anti-fraud systems and multi-factor authentication.

AML and Compliance in Digital Bank

A digital bank implements:

  • Automation of KYC/AML – machine learning analyzes transactions, identifying suspicious operations in real-time.
  • Digital compliance officer and digital identification of beneficiaries accelerate verification processes and reduce the risk of fines.
  • Compliance in digital banking in the EU, Singapore, and Dubai is built on international FATF standards, as confirmed by COREDO’s practice of licensing cryptocurrency and payment companies.

Regulation of Digital Banks Worldwide

Regulatory requirements for digital banks differ by region:

  • PSD2 is in effect in the EU, obliging banks to open APIs for third-party services and strengthen KYC/AML requirements.
  • In Asia and Africa, regulatory sandboxes are actively used to test innovative fintech solutions under regulatory oversight.
  • For non-residents and international companies, remote verification and electronic document requirements are of particular importance.
The solution developed by COREDO for clients in Singapore and Estonia considers the specifics of local regulators and facilitates faster registration of legal entities through a digital bank.

Open an Account in a Digital Bank for Business

Illustration for the section "Open an Account in a Digital Bank for Business" in the article "Digital Banks - What Are They and Can They Be Trusted"
Opening an account in a digital bank for business: it is not just a step towards modern service, but an opportunity to gain instant financial transaction access, automate processes, and simplify company management. Further, we will analyze how to open a corporate account in a digital bank and what steps your business will need.

How to Open a Corporate Account in a Digital Bank

COREDO’s practice shows that successfully opening a business account in a digital bank in the EU or Asia requires:

  1. Choosing the jurisdiction and digital bank with an appropriate license and the ability to serve non-residents.
  2. Gathering documents: statutory documents, beneficiary data, address confirmation, business plan.
  3. Undergoing remote verification and electronic identification (eID), most digital banks use video conferences, digital signatures, and biometric authentication.
  4. Completing an online application and digital onboarding: the automation of KYC/AML allows for completion within 1-3 days.
  5. Integrating the account with ERP and accounting for automating reporting and operations control.

Features of SEO for Startups and E-commerce

The digital bank becomes especially in demand for:

  • Startups in Asia: minimal requirements for authorized capital, quick launch of multi-currency accounts, integration with SaaS platforms.
  • IT companies and e-commerce, the ability to automate currency operations, use digital platforms for B2B, and integrate banking services with ERP and CRM.
  • Holding structures, centralized control, transaction transparency, KYC/AML automation for subsidiaries.
The COREDO team has implemented projects for opening accounts for international holdings in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Singapore, where digital banks allowed for compliance cost reduction and operational speed increase.

Integration of Digital Bank with ERP and Accounting

Integration of a digital bank with corporate systems ensures:

  • API integration for business – automatic data exchange between the bank and ERP, accounting, and tax services.
  • Electronic documents and digital signatures, legally significant operations without paper document flow.
  • Automation of tax reporting and currency operations, which are especially important for companies operating in multiple jurisdictions.
COREDO’s experience shows: integration of digital banks with business processes not only accelerates financial transactions but also enhances transparency for auditors and regulators.

Risks of Digital Banks and Ways to Mitigate Them

Illustration for the section "Risks of Digital Banks and Ways to Mitigate Them" in the article "Digital Banks - What Are They and Can They Be Trusted"

The risks of digital banks are becoming more relevant with the rapid technological advancements and the transition to online services. Ensuring sustainable operation and client trust requires timely identification and mitigation of key threats such as cyberattacks, fraud, and tech disruptions. Below we consider the key types of these risks and effective ways to minimize them.

Cyber Threats, Fraud, Disruptions

A digital bank, like any fintech service, is subject to several risks:

  • Cyber threats and hacks: despite a high level of cybersecurity, attacks on digital banks are becoming more sophisticated.
  • Fraud and phishing, attempts to compromise credentials through fake interfaces.
  • Platform disruptions, technical issues can lead to temporary service unavailability.
In COREDO cases, KYC/AML automation and the implementation of biometric authentication helped reduce fraud levels and increased cybersecurity resilience.

How to Reduce Business Risks

For risk minimization, the COREDO team recommends:

  • Checking licenses and regulation of the digital bank in the chosen jurisdiction.
  • Using multi-factor authentication and anti-fraud systems.
  • Automating compliance and KYC/AML, appointing a digital compliance officer.
  • Keeping up with regulatory updates and using regulatory sandboxes to test new solutions.
  • Integrating digital banks with corporate systems for transparency and control.
COREDO’s practice confirms: a systematic approach to security and compliance allows trusting digital banks even when working with large corporate clients.

Digital Banks for International Companies: Trends

Digital banks for international companies today create a new reality of financial services, actively implementing cutting-edge technologies and offering innovative solutions for global business. These trends are changing safety standards, management, and customer interaction, determining the industry’s competitiveness by 2025. Below we consider the key technologies that set the development vector – from open banking and AI to blockchain.

New Technologies: AI, Blockchain, Open Banking

The future of digital banks is defined by the implementation of:

  • Artificial intelligence in banking services – compliance automation, risk prediction, service personalization.
  • Blockchain in banking infrastructure – enhancing transparency, reducing costs of international transfers.
  • Open banking and digital wallets, expanding the ecosystem of digital banks through third-party service integration.
COREDO actively implements AI and blockchain-based solutions for clients interested in AML automation and international settlements.

The Future of Digital Banking Regulation

  • PSD2 in the EU sets standards of openness and security for all digital banks.
  • Regulatory sandboxes in Asia and Africa allow for quick testing of innovative fintech products.
  • GDPR and local data protection laws create new requirements for information storage and processing.
The digital bank market is becoming increasingly global, and regulation is becoming more transparent and technological.

The Effectiveness of Digital Banks for Business

Implementing a digital bank allows for:

  • Reducing account maintenance and compliance costs by up to 40% (according to Accenture data).
  • Accelerating international transfers and currency transactions.
  • Improving transparency and manageability of financial flows through digital platforms for B2B and SaaS solutions.
COREDO clients report ROI growth in the first year after transitioning to digital banking, especially when scaling business into new jurisdictions.

Practical Recommendations for Business

Digital banks are not just alternatives to traditional financial institutions but strategic tools for international business, allowing for quick legal entity registration, compliance automation, and enhanced operational security. On the other hand, trust in digital banks should be built on thorough license checks, integration with corporate systems, and continuous risk monitoring.

Advantages and Risks of Digital Banks for Business

Advantages of Digital Banks Risks of Digital Banks Practical Recommendations
Fast account opening, remote identification, multi-currency accounts, integration with ERP and accounting, KYC/AML automation, transparency of operations Cyber threats, regulatory restrictions, complexity of reliability checking, possible disruptions, compliance requirements Check licenses and regulations, use two-factor authentication, automate compliance, integrate digital banks with business processes, stay updated with regulatory changes

COREDO’s Recommendations:

  • Choose a digital bank considering the jurisdiction, license, and ability to serve international companies.
  • Integrate banking services with ERP and accounting for automating financial processes.
  • Implement multi-level data protection, KYC/AML automation, and digital beneficiary identification.
  • Monitor regulatory changes and use regulatory sandboxes to test new fintech solutions.
  • Consider the digital bank as a strategic partner for scaling and managing business in the EU, Asia, and Africa.
The practice of COREDO proves that a competent choice and implementation of digital banks is a path to growth, transparency, and security for international business.

Did you know that according to the European Commission, over 65% of new wholesale companies in the EU choose Central Europe as their starting and scaling location? Slovakia, despite its compact size, ranks in the top 5 countries for export growth rates and the volume of attracted foreign investments in the B2B trading sector. But why do so many entrepreneurs from Europe, Asia, and the CIS choose this jurisdiction? How can it be explained that Company Registration in Slovakia has become one of the most in-demand tools for entering the European market, legalizing business in the EU, and optimizing tax burdens?

In recent years, the COREDO team has observed a steady trend: entrepreneurs face bureaucratic barriers, opaque compliance requirements, difficulties in opening bank accounts, and the risks of double taxation. My experience confirms that the choice of jurisdiction for a wholesale business is a strategic decision that affects not only the speed of the start but also long-term sustainability, asset protection, scaling opportunities, and access to EU markets.

In this article, I will analyze in detail why opening a company in Slovakia is not just a formality but a thoughtful investment in the future of your business. If you’re looking for transparent rules of the game, competitive tax rates, flexible corporate structures, and reliable legal protection: read to the end. Here you will find not only answers to questions but also practical tools for effective entry into the European market.

Company Registration in Slovakia: a Fast Start for Wholesale Business in the EU

Illustration for the section "Company Registration in Slovakia: a Fast Start for Wholesale Business in the EU" in the article "Why a Company in Slovakia is an Excellent Choice for Wholesale Business"

How to Open a Wholesale Company in Slovakia: A Step-by-Step Guide

My experience shows: registration of a company in Slovakia is a process that can be completed in 2-4 weeks with proper document preparation and a clear understanding of legal requirements. The classic form for a wholesale business, S.R.O. (Spoločnosť s ručením obmedzeným), is the European equivalent of an LLC. The minimum share capital for S.R.O. is 5,000 euros, with only 2,500 euros needed before registration, and the rest within a year. This makes market entry accessible for both startups and experienced players.

The entire procedure includes:

  • Preparation of founding documents (charter, resolution to create, information about directors and shareholders).
  • Checking the uniqueness of the name and its reservation.
  • Opening a temporary bank account to deposit share capital.
  • Registration of a legal address (commercial property or a virtual office is acceptable).
  • Submission of documents to the Slovak Trade Register.
  • Obtaining an identification number (IČO) and a tax number (DIČ).
  • VAT registration when necessary – particularly relevant for wholesale companies working with clients across the EU.
COREDO’s practice confirms: foreign founders and directors can own and manage the company on equal terms with residents, and personal presence is not required for registration: all stages can be done remotely with the help of a trusted representative.

Opening a bank account is a separate stage that requires thorough preparation of KYC dossier and a business plan. The solution developed at COREDO allows minimizing rejection risks via prior compliance checks and support in negotiations with banks.

Legal Support for Companies and Compliance in Slovakia

The modern AML compliance requirements and implementation of KYC procedures in Slovakia comply with European standards and the EU Directive 2015/849. For wholesale companies, this means the need for a transparent ownership structure, regular updating of beneficiary information, and maintaining corporate reporting according to EU standards.

The COREDO team has successfully implemented dozens of business legalization projects in the EU, including the preparation of internal AML/KYC policies, personnel training, and support during bank compliance checks. This approach not only allows successful registration but also prevents account blocking, fines, and reputational risks.

Advantages of the Slovak Jurisdiction for Wholesale Business

Illustration for the section "Advantages of the Slovak Jurisdiction for Wholesale Business" in the article "Why a Company in Slovakia is an Excellent Choice for Wholesale Business"

Why Slovakia: One of the Best Jurisdictions for Wholesale Business in Europe

Slovakia offers a unique combination of factors that make it attractive for business scaling:

  • Friendly tax system: the corporate tax rate is 22%, and under certain conditions, it can be optimized to 15% for small businesses.
  • Political stability and transparency of the legal framework: the country is in the eurozone, fully integrated into the EU economic area, and upholds corporate governance and investment protection standards.
  • Minimal state interference: business registration and maintenance are highly automated, with most procedures online.
  • Productive and affordable workforce: salary levels and labor taxes are lower than in Western Europe, with a highly qualified workforce.
  • Economic integration with the EU: free movement of goods, services, and capital, access to EU public and corporate tenders.
  • Flexible S.R.O. corporate structure: the ability to create holding and trading companies, outsource business processes, and protect assets.
COREDO’s practice shows: for wholesale business, the speed of registration, lack of hidden barriers for foreigners, and the possibility of legalizing a business to work with large European clients are particularly important.

Confidentiality, Anonymity, and Asset Protection

Slovak corporate law provides a high level of corporate anonymity and asset protection. Owners of S.R.O. are not required to disclose their data in public registers, and information about beneficiaries is available only to regulators and banks within AML/KYC procedures.

Investment protection agreements and a developed judicial system guarantee the safety of investments, and holding structures allow centralized asset management and tax optimization. Solutions developed by COREDO enable building a corporate structure taking into account individual goals for confidentiality and capital protection.

Taxation in Slovakia: Optimization for International Trade

Illustration for the section "Taxation in Slovakia: Optimization for International Trade" in the article "Why a Company in Slovakia is an Excellent Choice for Wholesale Business"

How to Legally Optimize Taxes When Conducting Wholesale Business in Slovakia

Slovakia offers transparent and competitive tax conditions for international trading companies:

  • Corporate tax: the basic rate is 22%, but for small companies with a turnover of up to 49 million euros – 15%.
  • Minimal dividend tax rate: for EU residents: 7%, for non-residents – 35%, but there are many double taxation avoidance agreements that can reduce the effective rate.
  • European VAT (VAT): the standard rate is 20%, with the possibility of VAT refund when exporting to other EU countries.
  • Tax incentives for large investment projects: profit tax exemption for 5-10 years when creating new jobs or investing in infrastructure.
The EU Council Directive No. 2011/96/EU (Parent-Subsidiary Directive) completely exempts dividends from taxation when paid between EU companies, which is especially relevant for holding structures.

The COREDO team supports clients at all stages of tax planning, including obtaining a tax residency certificate, preparing financial statements according to EU standards, and implementing legal tax optimization schemes.

Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements and International Settlements

Slovakia has signed more than 60 double taxation avoidance agreements, allowing the minimization of tax costs in cross-border transactions and dividend transfers. For wholesale companies, this means the ability to legally reduce the tax burden when working with clients and partners from different countries.

Obtaining a tax residency certificate is a standard procedure confirming the status of a Slovak company as an EU tax resident. The solution implemented by COREDO includes comprehensive document preparation and interaction with tax authorities.

Residence and Citizenship Through Business in Slovakia: Opportunities for Entrepreneurs

Illustration for the section "Residence and Citizenship Through Business in Slovakia: Opportunities for Entrepreneurs" in the article "Why a Company in Slovakia is an Excellent Choice for Wholesale Business"

How to Obtain Residence and Citizenship Through Company Establishment

Opening a business in Slovakia paves the way to obtaining a residence permit (Residence) and, eventually, EU citizenship. Residence through business is granted to founders and top managers of the company if they conduct real activities, create jobs, and meet financial reporting requirements.

COREDO’s practice shows: a well-structured business plan, transparent corporate structure, and timely submission of reports according to EU standards significantly increase the chances of Residence approval. After several years of successful business operation, it is possible to obtain permanent residence and citizenship.

Practical Aspects of Business Relocation from the CIS to Slovakia

Relocating a business from the CIS to the EU involves considering numerous nuances: from migration legislation to currency control and integration into the local business environment. The COREDO team supports clients at all stages of corporate migration, from risk analysis to adapting business processes to European standards.

Typical challenges include the need to confirm sources of funds, undergo banking compliance procedures, and adapt corporate reporting. COREDO solutions minimize these barriers and ensure a smooth transition to the European market.

Holding Company in Slovakia and Scaling Wholesale Business

Illustration for the section "Holding Company in Slovakia and Scaling Wholesale Business" in the article "Why a Company in Slovakia is an Excellent Choice for Wholesale Business"

Scaling and Integration into International Supply Chains

The Slovak jurisdiction is ideal for establishing holding and trading companies, integrating into international supply chains, and attracting financing. The S.R.O. corporate structure allows centralized management of subsidiaries in different countries, optimizing taxes and protecting assets.

COREDO’s experience confirms: Slovak companies successfully attract bank loans, participate in EU government tenders, and outsource business processes to reduce costs. This approach ensures the flexibility and scalability necessary for a dynamic wholesale business.

Comparison with Other European Jurisdictions for Wholesale Business

Criterion Slovakia Poland Hungary Czech Republic
Corporate tax rate 22% 19% 9% 19%
Minimum share capital S.R.O 5,000 EUR 5,000 PLN 3,000,000 HUF 1 CZK
Possibility of 100% foreign ownership Yes Yes Yes Yes
Residence through business Yes Yes Yes Yes
Registration period 2-4 weeks 2-4 weeks 2-4 weeks 2-4 weeks
Reporting requirements EU standards EU standards EU standards EU standards
A comparative analysis shows: Slovakia combines entry affordability, flexible corporate structure, and a high level of investment protection. Meanwhile, compliance procedures and bank checks in Slovakia, according to COREDO’s experience, are faster and more transparent than in many neighboring countries.

Key Findings and Practical Recommendations for Wholesale Companies

  • Company registration in Slovakia: an optimal choice for quickly and legally entering the European market.
  • Legal support and compliance: a systematic approach to AML/KYC, preparation of reports, and interaction with banks minimizes the risks of blocking and penalties.
  • Asset protection and corporate anonymity: the flexible S.R.O. structure and well-developed judicial system ensure the safety of investments and confidentiality of owners.
  • Tax load optimization: utilizing double taxation avoidance agreements, VAT refund, and tax incentives legally reduce costs and increase ROI.
  • Scaling and integration into EU supply chains: Slovak companies easily integrate into international projects, attract financing, and participate in tenders.
  • Business relocation and Residence through business: opening a company in Slovakia is an effective tool for obtaining Residence and long-term integration into the EU economy.
COREDO’s practice proves: a strategic approach to choosing a jurisdiction, comprehensive legal support, and a deep understanding of Slovak legislation specifics allow not only to minimize risks but also to unlock the full potential of the wholesale business in the European market.

99% of companies dealing with finance, cryptocurrencies, or payment services in the Czech Republic will eventually face an AML audit by the FAU. Last year alone, requests from the Financial Analytical Office (FAU Czech Republic) to legal entities increased by 40%: and this is not the limit: in 2025, stricter anti-money laundering legislation and an expansion of the list of AML obliged entities are expected. Why do successful entrepreneurs, who meticulously build business processes, suddenly face account blockages, fines, and licensing threats? How can you ensure not only formal but also real compliance with FAU requirements, minimize risks, and protect your business reputation?

My experience and the cases of COREDO show: passing the FAU AML audit is not a one-time task but a strategic process that requires systematic preparation, a thorough understanding of regulatory requirements, and constant improvement of internal control. In this article, I will thoroughly analyze how to prepare a company for the FAU audit in the Czech Republic, what documents and procedures are necessary, what mistakes even experienced market players make, and how to avoid them. Here you will find not only a step-by-step guide but also practical recommendations based on real COREDO cases, which will help you pass the FAU audit with minimal risks and maximum efficiency.

If you want not just to “report” to the regulator but to build a sustainable AML compliance system capable of supporting the scaling and growth of your business in the Czech Republic and the EU – read on. This guide will give you a strategic advantage.

FAU Czech Republic and AML audit: what businesses should know

Illustration for the section "FAU Czech Republic and AML audit: what businesses should know" in the article "How to Pass an FAU Audit in the Czech Republic"

The role of the FAU in the Czech financial monitoring system

The Financial Analytical Office (FAU Czech Republic) is the central financial monitoring authority that controls compliance with the anti-money laundering legislation of the Czech Republic and the EU. The responsibility of the FAU includes not only banks but also all companies falling under the definition of AML obliged entities: fintech, cryptocurrency services, payment institutions, investment funds, accounting and law firms, as well as a number of other sectors.

Example Image

COREDO’s practice confirms: the FAU is not limited to a formal document check but evaluates the real effectiveness of internal control, the completeness of KYC procedures, the transparency of the origin of funds, and the company’s ability to identify suspicious transactions. This is why implementing comprehensive AML compliance for companies in the Czech Republic becomes an integral part of sustainable business development.

Who and when does the FAU audit

An FAU audit of a business can be scheduled (as part of annual monitoring) or unscheduled: for example, triggered by a suspicious activity report, a customer complaint, or in connection with an investigation into high-risk jurisdictions. FAU requirements for legal entities apply to all companies that:

  • conduct activities related to managing clients’ monetary resources;
  • perform cryptocurrency exchange or storage;
  • conduct payment operations, investment services, accounting, or legal business support in the Czech Republic.

The COREDO team has implemented dozens of projects where the FAU audit impacted not only large financial institutions but also startups that had just registered a company in the Czech Republic. It’s important to understand: even if the company’s turnover is small, the formal status of an AML obliged entity requires full compliance with the anti-money laundering legislation of the Czech Republic.

Main FAU requirements for companies

The FAU sets comprehensive requirements for legal entities, among which the key ones are:

  • the presence and regular updating of internal AML policies and procedures;
  • the implementation of an internal control system aimed at detecting suspicious transactions;
  • effective KYC procedures and maintaining a client dossier;
  • transparent ownership structure and beneficial ownership;
  • regular risk assessment, including work with high-risk jurisdictions;
  • appointment of an AML contact person and their registration with the FAU;
  • timely reporting of suspicious activities.

The solution developed at COREDO for clients from the cryptocurrency and payment services sectors demonstrates that only the integration of all AML compliance elements allows passing the FAU audit without significant remarks and fines.

How to prepare a company for an AML audit by the FAU in the Czech Republic

Illustration for the section "How to prepare a company for an AML audit by the FAU in the Czech Republic" in the article "How to Pass an FAU Audit in the Czech Republic"

Documents for the FAU audit: full list

One of the most common requests from COREDO clients: what documents are needed for passing the AML audit in the Czech Republic? In practice, the FAU requires:

  • the company’s statutory documents (charter, excerpt from the Czech Commercial Register);
  • a business plan for the regulator (especially for crypto and fintech companies);
  • internal AML/KYC policies and procedures;
  • documents confirming the origin of funds;
  • dossiers on clients and counterparties (KYC procedures Czech Republic, due diligence);
  • reports on internal and external audits of financial statements;
  • confirmation of the registration of the AML contact person;
  • evidence of the implementation of an internal control and reporting system for businesses in the Czech Republic.

In one of COREDO’s cases, preparing a complete set of documents allowed the client to pass the FAU audit without additional requests, which significantly reduced the duration and operational costs.

Implementing and updating AML/KYC policy

An effective AML/KYC policy for the FAU is not just a formal document but a live risk management tool. At COREDO, we recommend:

  • regularly reviewing and updating internal policies in light of legislative changes;
  • implementing a risk-oriented approach to clients and operations;
  • using automated systems to monitor suspicious transactions;
  • training employees on AML procedures and KYC.

Our experience shows that companies that integrate AML compliance into daily business processes demonstrate better resilience to FAU audits and scale more quickly into new markets.

Registration of the AML contact person and their responsibilities

Registration of the AML contact person in the Czech Republic is a mandatory requirement for all AML obliged entities. The compliance officer is responsible for:

  • interaction with the FAU;
  • timely reporting of suspicious activities;
  • implementation and control of AML procedures;
  • organization of staff training.

In 2025, FAU requirements for the qualification and experience of the contact person will be tightened: confirmed education, experience in the AML field, and knowledge of Czech legislation will be necessary. COREDO’s practice confirms: appointing a professional compliance officer reduces the risk of fines and speeds up communication with the regulator.

Risk assessment and preparation for due diligence

Risk assessment during an AML audit in the Czech Republic: a key preparation stage. It is important to:

  • identify high-risk jurisdictions and types of suspicious operations;
  • conduct internal due diligence on clients and partners;
  • document the results of the assessment and adjust internal procedures.

The COREDO team recommends using specialized tools for automating due diligence and assessing the sustainability of the business model, especially when working with international clients.

Stages of passing the FAU audit in the Czech Republic: step-by-step guide

Illustration for the section "Stages of passing the FAU audit in the Czech Republic: step-by-step guide" in the article "How to Pass an FAU Audit in the Czech Republic"

Pre-audit and internal control

Before submitting documents to the FAU, it is important to conduct an internal audit – a test check of compliance with all processes and documents. At COREDO, we use checklists and methodologies based on FAU requirements and European directives to identify weaknesses and eliminate them before the official audit. An external audit of financial statements can also be an additional argument in favor of business transparency.

Document submission and interaction with the regulator

Document submission is carried out through FAU electronic forms. It is important to:

  • provide a complete set of documents;
  • accurately fill in all forms;
  • promptly respond to FAU requests.

Negotiating with the FAU requires professionalism and clear argumentation. COREDO’s experience shows: transparent communication and a readiness for dialogue minimize the risk of prolonged audits and additional requirements.

Verification of funds’ origin and KYC procedures

The FAU pays special attention to verifying the origin of funds in the Czech Republic and the effectiveness of KYC procedures. Companies must:

  • documentally confirm funding sources;
  • conduct client identification through a multi-level scheme (KYC, enhanced due diligence);
  • maintain a client dossier with regular information updates.

In one of COREDO’s projects for a fintech company, implementing an automated KYC platform significantly reduced operational costs and improved the quality of customer verification.

Responding to FAU requests and corrective actions

During an AML audit in the Czech Republic, the FAU may send additional requests, require clarifications or procedural adjustments. It is important to:

  • promptly respond to all messages;
  • document all actions taken to address comments;
  • if necessary, initiate a dialogue with the regulator to clarify positions.

COREDO’s practice includes cases where promptly providing explanations for suspicious activities helped avoid fines and limit requirements to modify internal procedures.

Errors and risks during AML audit: how to avoid them

Illustration for the section "Errors and risks during AML audit: how to avoid them" in the article "How to Pass an FAU Audit in the Czech Republic"

Common errors by companies and their consequences

Among the most common errors companies make during FAU audits:

  • formal approach to implementing AML/KYC policy;
  • absence of current documents for the FAU Czech Republic audit;
  • insufficient qualification of the AML contact person;
  • ignoring requirements for maintaining a client dossier;
  • untimely reporting of suspicious operations.

The responsibility of accountants under Czech AML law and company management is personal, and fines for AML violations in the Czech Republic can reach millions of crowns and lead to license revocation.

How to minimize risks and prepare the team

Minimizing risks during the FAU audit in the Czech Republic is possible through:

  • regular staff training on AML procedures;
  • conducting internal training and test audits;
  • automation of due diligence and KYC processes.

COREDO develops training programs and methodological materials that enable quick team preparation for any FAU audit scenario.

Practical cases and successful strategies

One of COREDO’s cases: supporting the registration of a crypto exchange in the Czech Republic: thanks to comprehensive document preparation, the implementation of an automated internal control system, and regular staff training, the company passed the FAU audit with minimal remarks and obtained a crypto exchange license in the Czech Republic in the shortest possible time.

Among the best practices for interacting with the FAU to minimize the risk of fines are proactive communication, regular self-assessment of risks, and the use of external audits to confirm the transparency of business processes.

Features of the FAU AML audit for cryptocurrency and fintech companies

Illustration for the section "Features of the FAU AML audit for cryptocurrency and fintech companies" in the article "How to Pass an FAU Audit in the Czech Republic"

License for crypto exchange and FAU registration

For cryptocurrency and fintech companies, registration in the Czech Republic and obtaining a license for a crypto exchange in the Czech Republic require special attention to AML compliance. At COREDO, we assist clients at all stages – from preparing a business plan for the regulator to FAU registration for crypto businesses, considering the specifics of working with digital assets and international payments.

Requirements for internal control and funds segregation

Crypto and fintech companies are required to implement segregated accounts for companies in the Czech Republic, ensure the segregation of client funds, and ensure transparency of all operations. The implementation of internal control for the FAU must consider the specifics of digital assets, and the automation of monitoring suspicious transactions becomes a mandatory standard.

New FAU requirements and European directives

Starting in 2025, new FAU requirements based on the latest European AML directives will come into effect. This includes:

  • expanding the list of AML obliged entities;
  • tightening requirements for identifying beneficial owners;
  • regular updates of internal AML policies;
  • integration of FAU requirements into the business processes of international companies.

COREDO tracks all legislative changes and helps clients timely adapt to new standards, ensuring compliance with both Czech and pan-European regulatory requirements.

Practical recommendations and checklist for successfully passing the FAU audit

Stage Key actions Documents/tools Responsible persons
Preliminary audit Internal analysis, test check AML/KYC policy, internal audit Compliance officer
Document collection Prepare full set Charter, business plan, AML/KYC documents Legal department
Registration of contact person Appointment, FAU notification Application, qualification confirmation Management
Interaction with FAU Respond to queries, resolve comments Electronic forms, correspondence Compliance officer
Staff training Conduct training sessions Guidelines, online courses HR, compliance officer

Practical steps for passing the FAU include regular updates of internal control, KYC automation, maintaining a client dossier, and constant communication with the regulator. This approach allows you to prepare the company for the FAU audit in the Czech Republic and minimize risks.

Answers to frequently asked questions by entrepreneurs about the FAU audit

What strategic risks are associated with passing the FAU audit in the Czech Republic?
Strategic risks include account blocking, license revocation, loss of business reputation, and significant financial losses. Implementing comprehensive AML compliance reduces the likelihood of these events occurring.
What is the cost and ROI of implementing AML compliance for medium-sized businesses?
The cost depends on the scale of the business and the chosen automation tools. ROI manifests in the reduction of penalties, accelerated entry into new markets, and increased trust from partners and investors.
How to automate AML/KYC processes?
Use specialized platforms for transaction monitoring, due diligence automation, and maintaining client dossiers. COREDO recommends integrating such solutions into daily business processes.
What are the criteria for selecting an AML contact person?
The contact person must have a relevant education, experience in the AML field, knowledge of Czech and English languages, and confirmed qualifications. In 2025, qualification requirements are tightening.
How to appeal FAU decisions in case of refusal?
The appeal procedure includes submitting written objections, providing additional evidence, and, if necessary, going to court. COREDO’s practice shows: a well-prepared appeal often leads to a reconsideration of the regulator’s decision.

Key conclusions and recommendations for business

  • Passing the FAU audit in the Czech Republic is a strategic process requiring a systematic approach to AML compliance.
  • The key to success is integrating internal AML policies, automating KYC, regularly assessing risks, and having a professional team.
  • Use checklists, train staff, and maintain transparent communication with the regulator.
  • Keep up with legislative changes and promptly update internal procedures.
  • For self-preparation, we recommend using current FAU, European regulator resources, and professional tools for automating due diligence and transaction monitoring.

COREDO’s experience shows: only a comprehensive and proactive approach to AML audits allows not just complying with FAU requirements but creating a competitive advantage in the Czech and EU markets.

In 2025, company registration in Poland becomes not just an administrative procedure but a strategic step for international entrepreneurs seeking sustainable growth and entry into European markets. According to the European Commission, Poland ranks among the top three EU countries in terms of GDP growth and the number of new legal entities, with the share of foreign founders exceeding 28% in the structure of new companies. This statistic is not just surprising, it prompts reflection: why is Poland becoming a business hub for Europe, Asia, and the CIS?

However, behind the attractive figures lie challenges: tightening of compliance and AML procedures, new requirements for disclosing beneficiaries (UBO), difficulties in opening bank accounts, and constant changes in corporate and tax legislation. How can one minimize risks, save time and resources, and most importantly, gain a real competitive advantage? How to build a structure that will withstand audits, tax inspections, and allow for business scale-up in the EU?

In this article, I share a practical step-by-step guide based on COREDO‘s experience in the implementation of hundreds of projects on legal entity registration in Poland for clients from Europe, Asia, and the CIS. If you want not just to open a company in Poland but to create a sustainable platform for international business, read to the end. Here you will find not only answers to the most pressing questions but also strategic ideas that will allow you to stay ahead of the market.

Company Registration in Poland: Main Requirements and Stages

Illustration for the section "Company Registration in Poland: Main Requirements and Stages" in the article "How to Register a Company in Poland in 2025"

Requirements for Foreign Founders and Choice of Legal Form

In 2025, opening a company in Poland is possible for virtually any foreign citizen or legal entity, regardless of the country of origin. The key condition is compliance with KYC and AML procedures, as well as transparency in ownership structure. In practice, the COREDO team has implemented projects involving founders from the EU, Asia, and the CIS, including complex holding structures and joint ventures.

The most popular form is: Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnością (Sp. z o.o.), or LLC. It is optimal for small and medium-sized businesses, as well as for holding structures. For large investment projects or going public, a joint-stock company (S.A.) is used. It is also possible to register a branch of a foreign company or a representative office, the decision depends on goals, tax strategy, and licensing requirements.

Restrictions for foreign founders are minimal: there are no residency requirements for directors, but in regulated fields (finance, payment services, crypto) additional Licensing and stricter due diligence will be required. COREDO’s practice confirms that a pre-planned corporate structure and a well-thought-out disclosure of beneficiaries significantly speed up the registration process and reduce the risk of refusals from banks and regulators.

Necessary Documents for Company Registration in Poland

For LLC registration in Poland (Sp. z o.o.), the following package of documents is required:

  • Company memorandum and articles of association (in Polish)
  • Resolution on appointment of directors and distribution of shares
  • Confirmation of legal address (lease agreement or ownership certificate)
  • Power of attorney for a representative (if used)
  • Translations of founders’ documents (with apostille if required)
  • Application for entry into the KRS register
All documents must be notarized and, if necessary, legalized for use in Poland. COREDO’s experience shows that special attention should be paid to the accuracy of translations and data relevance: even a minor mistake can lead to registration delays or refusal in KRS.

Legal Address for Business in Poland: Requirements and Nuances

A legal address for business in Poland is a compulsory condition of registration. It determines the company’s tax residency and affects the choice of tax office. To confirm the address, a lease agreement or ownership certificate, and landlord consent to use the premises as a legal address are required.

The COREDO team recommends choosing an address depending on planned activities, logistics, and licensing requirements. In some cases, it is optimal to use a virtual office service, especially for holding structures and companies with international management. It is important to remember: tax residency is determined not only by address but also by the actual place of management of the company.

Electronic Company Registration in Poland: S24, KRS, and Digital Signature

Illustration for the section "Electronic Company Registration in Poland: S24, KRS, and Digital Signature" in the article "How to Register a Company in Poland in 2025"

Online Registration through the S24 Platform

From 2025, electronic company registration in Poland through the S24 platform has become the most convenient and fastest method. The platform allows registering an LLC (Sp. z o.o.) online in just 1–3 days, provided that documents are prepared correctly and founders have a qualified electronic signature (kwalifikowany podpis elektroniczny) or a trusted profile (Profil Zaufany).

Step-by-step guide:

  1. Create an account on S24 and upload founding documents (articles of association, memorandum, data of founders).
  2. Sign documents with the electronic signature of each founder.
  3. Pay the registration fee online.
  4. Send the document package to KRS through the platform.
  5. Receive registration confirmation and extract from KRS.
The solution developed by COREDO allows automating document preparation and integrating an electronic signature, which significantly reduces time frames and minimizes the likelihood of errors.

KRS Registration: Features and Differences from CEIDG

KRS (Krajowy Rejestr Sądowy) is the national judicial registry into which all legal entities (LLCs, JSCs, branches) are entered. Unlike CEIDG (register of individual entrepreneurs), KRS is used for companies with a corporate structure and mandatory share capital.

The main difference: CEIDG registration is suitable only for individuals, while KRS is for all forms of legal entities. Entering data into KRS requires precision and compliance of all documents with Polish corporate law standards. In practice, COREDO often encounters situations where clients confuse these registers, leading to delays and additional costs.

PESEL, Trusted Profile, and Electronic Signature

PESEL for business is a personal identification number required for founders and directors who are not Polish citizens. Obtaining PESEL is possible through a visit to the municipality or online if you have a trusted profile (Profil Zaufany).

For electronic registration, a qualified electronic signature (kwalifikowany podpis elektroniczny) is required, which foreign founders can obtain through accredited centers in Poland or abroad. COREDO’s practice shows that properly organizing the process of obtaining PESEL and an electronic signature helps avoid bureaucratic delays and speeds up registration.

Share Capital, Share Payment, and Ownership Structure

Illustration for the section "Share Capital, Share Payment, and Ownership Structure" in the article "How to Register a Company in Poland in 2025"

Share Capital: Minimum Requirements and Forms of Contribution

The minimum share capital for a company in Poland for an LLC is 5,000 PLN (≈1,150 euros). Important: capital can be contributed not only in cash but also in assets, intellectual property, and claims. Asset valuation upon registration is conducted by an independent expert if the capital is contributed in a non-monetary form.

COREDO’s experience confirms that proper structuring of share capital (especially in cross-border transactions and IP investments) allows optimizing taxes and increasing corporate structure transparency.

Ownership Structure, Beneficiary Disclosure, and UBO

Starting in 2025, requirements for beneficiary disclosure (UBO disclosure) have tightened: all companies are required to enter data on ultimate beneficial owners in the Central Register of Beneficiaries (CRBR) within 7 days of registration. Failure to meet deadlines may result in significant penalties.

The ownership structure affects not only taxation but also compliance procedures, including due diligence by banks and licensing authorities. COREDO’s practice is to conduct an ownership structure audit before submitting documents to exclude the risk of account blockages and registration refusals.

Compliance and AML Procedures in Business Registration in Poland

Illustration for the section "Compliance and AML Procedures in Business Registration in Poland" in the article "How to Register a Company in Poland in 2025"

Due Diligence and Legal Risk Audit

Before registration, the COREDO company always conducts due diligence for registration: a comprehensive check of the founders, funding sources, corporate structure, and business history. This allows identifying and mitigating legal and tax risks, especially for foreign founders.

  • Non-compliance of documents with KRS requirements
  • Insufficient transparency of the ownership structure
  • Presence of negative information about beneficiaries
  • Errors in translations and notarization
Early risk identification allows adjusting the strategy and avoiding refusals by regulators and banks.

AML Requirements: How to Ensure Compliance

Compliance and AML Procedures in Registration: These are not formalities but an essential condition for access to banking and financial services. Main stages:

  • Identification and verification of all founders and beneficiaries
  • Confirmation of the source of funds for share capital
  • Check for sanctions and negative information
  • Entering data into the CRBR and other state registers
The COREDO team developed algorithms to automate compliance checks and prepare the company for any AML audits, which is crucial for businesses in fintech, crypto, and payment services sectors.

Opening a Bank Account and VAT Registration

Illustration for the section "Opening a Bank Account and VAT Registration" in the article "How to Register a Company in Poland in 2025"

Procedure for Opening a Bank Account for the Company

Company Bank Account – one of the most difficult stages for foreign founders. Banks require a full package of corporate documents, confirmation of legal address, UBO disclosure, and completion of AML procedures.

To minimize the risk of refusals, COREDO recommends:
  • Prepare documents in advance, including translations and apostilles
  • Conduct an internal audit of compliance risks
  • Choose a bank specializing in working with foreign capital
  • Use recommendations and support from an experienced legal partner
COREDO’s solution: client support at all stages, including communication with the bank and preparation for the interview.

VAT Registration and Tax Aspects

VAT registration in Poland is mandatory for companies planning to conduct trade or service activities in the EU. The procedure takes 1–2 weeks and requires providing a business plan, lease agreement, and share capital confirmation.

Key taxes for companies in Poland:
  • CIT (corporate tax), 19% (or 9% for small businesses)
  • VAT, 23% (standard rate)
  • Dividend tax, 19% (with the possibility of reduction through international agreements)
COREDO’s practice shows that proper business structuring and the use of international agreements can significantly optimize taxes and reduce fiscal risks.

Corporate Governance and Business Support in Poland

Corporate Governance, Asset Protection, and Intellectual Property

Requirements for corporate governance in Polish companies include holding regular meetings, keeping minutes, disclosing information about beneficiaries, and complying with GDPR. Special attention should be paid to protecting intellectual property, especially when registering IT companies, startups, and holdings.

COREDO has implemented cases where IP protection and proper structuring of dividend payments allowed clients to avoid corporate disputes and tax claims from regulators.

Legal Support and Document Flow Automation

The role of a legal partner goes beyond registration: company registration support in Poland includes document flow automation, preparation for audits, tax, and compliance checks. COREDO’s solutions allow for the integration of electronic document circulation, speeding up processes, and reducing costs.

Features of Company Registration for Residence Permit (Karta Pobytu)

Karta Pobytu, a residence permit, which can be obtained through company registration and job creation. Requirements include conducting real economic activity, having an office, paying taxes and contributions. COREDO’s experience shows that an optimal business structure and transparency of financial flows significantly increase the chances of obtaining a residence permit for founders and employees.

Challenges, Mistakes, and New Legislative Changes in 2025

Typical Mistakes and Difficulties in Registration

Most common mistakes:
  • Incorrect translations and lack of document notarization
  • Violation of UBO disclosure deadlines
  • Insufficient attention to AML procedures
  • Errors in choosing legal address and ownership structure
Registering a company with several foreign founders requires special attention to document alignment and information disclosure in CRBR. COREDO’s solution: comprehensive support, including risk audits and preparation for potential bank and regulator requests.

New Changes in Legislation on Legal Entity Registration

In 2025, new rules on beneficiary disclosure have come into effect, AML and compliance requirements have tightened, and the list of licensed activities has expanded. To enter the EU, Asia, and Africa markets, it is important to consider requirements for cross-border business structuring, personal data protection (GDPR), and integration with European payment systems.

Key Conclusions and Practical Recommendations

Registration Stage Duration (days) Main Costs (euros) Key Risks and Nuances
Document preparation 2–5 300–800 Translations, notarization
Opening a legal address 1–3 100–500 Lease agreement, address confirmation
Registration through S24/KRS 1–7 150–300 Electronic signature, PESEL
Opening a bank account 3–10 0–200 AML check, possible refusals
VAT registration 7–14 0–100 Tax office check

Actionable Advice

  • Start with an audit of ownership structure and preparation of a complete document package considering KRS and CRBR requirements.
  • Use electronic registration through S24 to speed up processes and reduce costs.
  • Obtain PESEL and electronic signature for all founders in advance.
  • Conduct compliance and AML checks before submitting documents to avoid account blockages and bank refusals.
  • For complex structures and international projects, involve COREDO experts for support at all stages, including opening accounts, VAT registration, licensing, and intellectual property protection.
  • Implement document flow automation to improve transparency and preparedness for audits.
  • Monitor legislative changes and update the corporate structure in line with new requirements.
Legal consultation on business registration and comprehensive support from COREDO is not just a formality, but a strategic tool for minimizing risks and successfully scaling business in Poland and the EU.
In 2025, Czech Republic continues to surprise entrepreneurs: according to Eurostat, the country is in the top 5 EU countries for export growth rates and investment attractiveness among small and medium enterprises. But what makes the jurisdiction of the Czech Republic for business not just another point on the map of Europe, but a real center of attraction for international companies?

Firstly, the strategic location of the Czech Republic provides direct access to key EU transport and trade routes. COREDO’s practice has repeatedly confirmed: for clients focused on scaling their business in Europe and integrating with European logistics chains, Czech registration becomes the optimal launch platform. Geographically, the Czech Republic borders Germany, Austria, Poland, and Slovakia, allowing companies to minimize delivery times and logistics costs when entering EU markets.

The second non-obvious but extremely important factor is the developed infrastructure and sustainable international partnership networks. In recent years, the COREDO team has implemented projects to support export-oriented companies for which the Czech Republic has become not only an entry point but also a hub for building partnerships throughout the EU. Czech industrial parks, incubators, and accelerators provide access to innovative solutions, while government entrepreneurship support programs enable quick business scaling.

# Advantages of registering a business in the Czech Republic for foreign entrepreneurs

Illustration for the section "# Advantages of registering a business in the Czech Republic for foreign entrepreneurs" in the article "Why it is beneficial to establish a company in the Czech Republic in 2025"
Why is opening a company in the Czech Republic not just a formality but a strategic choice? In practice, COREDO has shown: Czech jurisdiction combines a transparent tax system, flexible corporate legislation, and a high degree of protection of owners’ rights. For foreign investors and startups, the Czech Republic offers:

  • Access to EU markets through the Czech Republic with minimal administrative barriers.
  • Startup support programs and preferential taxation for innovative companies.
  • The opportunity for long-term investments in the EU with asset and intellectual property protection.
  • Government initiatives to reduce operating costs and develop export-oriented business.
A real case from COREDO’s practice: support in registering an IT company with international participation, which increased turnover by 2.5 times in the first year of work in the Czech Republic due to integration with European logistics and payment systems, as well as using local tax incentives.

Main forms of doing business in the Czech Republic: LLC (S.R.O) and Sole Trader (živnostenský list)

Illustration for the section "Main forms of doing business in the Czech Republic: LLC (S.R.O) and Sole Trader (živnostenský list)" in the article "Why it is beneficial to establish a company in the Czech Republic in 2025"

# Czech LLC (S.R.O): features, requirements, advantages

Illustration for the section "# Czech LLC (S.R.O): features, requirements, advantages" in the article "Why it is beneficial to establish a company in the Czech Republic in 2025"
Czech LLC (S.R.O), the most popular form for medium and large companies focused on long-term operation and scaling. The minimum share capital is a symbolic amount: 1 CZK, making the entry threshold accessible to most entrepreneurs. The key advantages noted by the COREDO team:

  • Limited liability of the founders, personal assets are protected.
  • The ability to attract investments, create holding structures, and conduct export-oriented business.
  • A high level of corporate governance and transparency.
  • The application of corporate taxation in the Czech Republic at a rate of 19%, with the possibility of optimizing the tax burden through international planning.
From practice: for clients transferring business from the CIS, S.R.O allows not only legalizing activities in the EU but also accessing European financial instruments, including preferential business loans in the Czech Republic.

# Czech Sole Trader (živnostenský list): pros, cons, and nuances for non-residents

Illustration for the section "# Czech Sole Trader (živnostenský list): pros, cons, and nuances for non-residents" in the article "Why it is beneficial to establish a company in the Czech Republic in 2025"
Czech Sole Trader (živnostenský list), the optimal choice for freelancers, consultants, and micro-enterprises. Among the advantages:

  • Simplified business management system in the Czech Republic and minimal reporting requirements.
  • Fast registration and low startup cost.
  • The possibility of legal employment and participation in social and medical funds.
However, as the experience of COREDO shows, there are restrictions for non-residents: the level of asset protection is lower, and opportunities for scaling and obtaining a residency permit are limited. At the same time, for market testing or launching pilot projects, this form can be effective.

# Comparative table: S.R.O vs. Sole Trader for foreigners

Criterion LLC (S.R.O) Sole Trader (živnostenský list)
Minimum share capital 1 CZK Not required
Liability Limited Unlimited
Residency permit possibility High Limited
Registration complexity Medium Low
Registration cost Medium Low
Corporate taxation 19% 15%
Social funds Yes Yes
Scaling opportunities High Medium

Step-by-step guide to registering a company in the Czech Republic in 2025

Illustration for the section "Step-by-step guide to registering a company in the Czech Republic in 2025" in the article "Why it is beneficial to establish a company in the Czech Republic in 2025"

# Document preparation and selection of corporate structure

The first stage is choosing a corporate structure in the Czech Republic based on the business model and goals. The solution developed by COREDO includes:

  • Preparation of founding documents (charter, information about beneficiaries, corporate structure).
  • Conducting a due diligence procedure and disclosing information about beneficiaries according to AML and KYC requirements.
  • Collecting additional permits for specific types of activities (financial services, licensed sectors).

# Opening a bank account and interaction with EMI

The next step: opening a bank account for a company in the Czech Republic. Here it is important to consider:

  • For non-residents, banks require an extended package of documents and proof of legal origin of funds.
  • An alternative becomes Electronic Money Institutions (EMI), which allow launching transactions quickly and integrating with European payment systems.
  • COREDO’s experience shows: preliminary preparation and support at the account opening stage significantly speed up the process and minimize risks of rejection.

# AML procedures and compliance for new companies

Czech legislation strictly regulates compliance and AML issues. For new companies, it is important:

  • To implement internal policies for client identification (KYC) and transaction monitoring.
  • To ensure transparency of the corporate structure and disclosure of beneficiaries.
  • To regularly undergo financial monitoring and provide reporting in accordance with local and international standards.
COREDO’s practice confirms: proper preparation for AML checks and the introduction of compliance procedures from the start helps avoid account blocks and fines.

Taxation in the Czech Republic: corporate rates, benefits, and optimization

# Corporate taxes and tax incentives for new companies

Corporate taxation in the Czech Republic is one of the most transparent and predictable in the EU. The base rate is 19%, and for certain types of income and innovative companies, there are tax benefits and incentives. In 2025, they remain:

  • Reduced rates for startups and companies investing in R&D.
  • The ability to use international agreements to prevent double taxation.
  • Programs for optimizing the tax burden for export-oriented businesses.
The COREDO team regularly accompanies clients on tax planning issues, allowing cost minimization and increasing project profitability.

# Taxation specifics for export-oriented businesses

For companies focused on export, the Czech Republic offers a number of advantages:

  • No currency control – free capital movement within the EU.
  • Preferential taxation for income received outside the Czech Republic.
  • Asset and intellectual property protection in the EU.
Implemented case COREDO: support in registering a holding structure for an international trading company, allowing for tax optimization and ensuring asset protection in several EU jurisdictions.

# Financial reporting and audit requirements

The Czech Republic has strict financial monitoring and reporting requirements. Companies must keep accounting records according to IFRS standards, provide annual reports, and, under certain conditions, undergo mandatory audits. For COREDO clients, automating accounting processes and implementing digital tools significantly reduce administrative burden and increase business transparency.

Business immigration and residency through company establishment in the Czech Republic

# How to obtain a business visa and residence permit for entrepreneurs

One of the key inquiries: Czech business visa and residence permit for entrepreneurs in the Czech Republic. In practice:

  • Starting a company (especially an S.R.O) gives the right to apply for a long-term business visa.
  • By meeting turnover requirements, creating jobs, and adhering to tax discipline, an entrepreneur may qualify for permanent residency, and subsequently, citizenship.
COREDO supports clients at all stages: from business plan preparation to passing immigration interviews.

# Step-by-step algorithm: residency and permanent residency for business owners

  1. Company registration in the Czech Republic and opening a bank account.
  2. Preparing a package of documents for a business visa (business plan, proof of financial viability, company details).
  3. Submitting an application and undergoing checks by immigration authorities.
  4. Obtaining residency and, with successful business operation: permanent residency.

Business scaling and international cooperation through the Czech Republic

# Opportunities for expansion to EU markets through the Czech jurisdiction

A Czech company: it is not just a tool for the local market, but an effective mechanism for business scaling in Europe. Through the Czech Republic, it is easy to:

  • Open branches and representations in other EU countries.
  • Leverage international partnership networks and integrate into European logistics chains.
  • Participate in government and private tenders, access European grants.
COREDO has successfully implemented projects to accompany the expansion of technology and manufacturing companies, for which the Czech Republic became a platform for entering the markets of Germany, Austria, France, and the Benelux countries.

# Relocating business from the CIS to the Czech Republic: risks and advantages

For companies from the CIS, relocating business to the Czech Republic is not only about reducing legal and tax risks but also the opportunity to legalize assets in the EU. However, it is important to consider:

  • The need to undergo compliance procedures and confirm sources of funds.
  • Adapting the corporate structure to Czech legal requirements.
  • Implementing international reporting and management standards.
The COREDO team supports clients at all stages, from risk assessment to integration into the European business environment.

Practical aspects and risks when opening a business in the Czech Republic

# Barriers for non-residents and ways to overcome them

Among the main barriers are difficulties opening bank accounts, AML and compliance requirements, and the need to disclose beneficiary information. The solution developed by COREDO includes:

  • Preliminary preparation of a complete document package.
  • Support during bank and KYC procedures.
  • Implementation of internal regulations on AML and corporate governance.

# Confidentiality, asset protection, and intellectual property

Czech legislation provides a high level of business confidentiality and intellectual property protection. For COREDO clients, solutions are implemented for:

  • Trademark and patent registration in the EU.
  • Structuring corporate rights with regard to beneficiary disclosure requirements.
  • Using holding structures for asset protection.

Key conclusions and practical recommendations for entrepreneurs

# Check-list: what to consider when opening a company in the Czech Republic in 2025

  • Determine the optimal corporate structure (S.R.O or Sole Trader).
  • Prepare foundational documents and undergo the due diligence procedure.
  • Select a bank or EMI to open a corporate account.
  • Implement internal policies for AML and KYC.
  • Develop a tax planning strategy.
  • Evaluate business immigration opportunities and residency acquisition.
  • Engage a professional consultant for registration support.

# Expert advice on minimizing risks and accelerating market entry in the EU

  • Use accounting automation and digital tools for reporting.
  • Implement international standards of corporate governance and compliance.
  • Apply modern solutions for intellectual property and asset protection.
  • Participate in startup support programs and accelerators in the Czech Republic for accelerated growth.
COREDO’s experience shows: careful planning, competent legal support, and integration into the Czech business environment not only minimize risks but also allow for a quick entry into EU markets, ensuring long-term stability and business growth.
In 2024, global business losses from lawsuits, raider attacks, and creditor claims exceeded $3 trillion: this amount is comparable to the GDP of entire countries. Every third entrepreneur working in Europe, Asia, or the CIS faces the threat of account blockages, asset freezes, or sudden corporate conflicts. In the context of tightened AML procedures, increased multi-jurisdictional barriers, and pressure on corporate confidentiality, standard asset protection tools become ineffective.

How can you ensure business resilience and preserve assets when your contractors, partners, and regulators operate under different rules? Why might even a well-structured corporate structure not withstand international litigation or creditor attacks? And how to use international legal tools not only to protect company assets but also to ensure transparency, compliance, and tax optimization?

In this article, I, Nikita Veremeev, founder of COREDO, and the company’s team of experts share practical strategies we have implemented for clients in the EU, Asia, and the CIS. Here you will find not just an overview of effective tools, but also a clear action plan that allows for establishing multi-level asset protection for a company amid international risks. Read the article to the end to get answers to key questions and learn how to avoid typical mistakes when structuring international business protection.

Company Asset Protection: Key International Legal Tools

Illustration for the section "Company Asset Protection: Key International Legal Tools" in the article "How to Protect Company Assets with International Legal Tools"
In international practice, company asset protection is based on the integration of several tools: corporate trusts, offshore companies, funds, holding structures, and the implementation of due diligence standards and risk management. Each serves its function, but only a comprehensive approach provides resilience against external and internal threats.

Corporate Structure for Asset Protection: How to Properly Build a Multi-Level System

COREDO’s experience shows: a multi-tiered corporate structure, including holding companies in the EU and Asia, separate operational companies, and specific SPVs (Special Purpose Vehicles), allows not only for risk distribution but also the creation of efficient protocols for business segregation. A key element is an individual operating agreement for each LLC, clearly outlining rights, responsibilities, conflict resolution mechanisms, and capital management procedures.
In one of COREDO’s cases, a client owning production assets in the Czech Republic and intellectual property in Singapore avoided account blockages and asset losses by implementing a multi-layered structure with separate legal entities for each business segment. This approach minimizes the risk of corporate debts and limits shareholder liability.

Trusts and Funds for Business: Comparative Analysis and Application

Trusts and funds are recognized international legal tools for company asset protection and succession planning. A classic example is the Nevis trust structure, offering high confidentiality and asset management flexibility. An alternative is the Panama fund, which provides strict asset transfer control and resilience to external legal threats.
Criterion Nevis Trust Structure Panama Fund
Jurisdiction Nevis Panama
Confidentiality High Medium/High
Tax Consequences Depends on structure Depends on structure
Asset Transfer Flexible Strict as per charter
Management Trustee Board of Governors, Trustee
Succession High High
AML/Compliance Required Required
The solution developed at COREDO for an international group of companies included the creation of a trust in Nevis with the appointment of an independent manager and the development of business segregation protocols. This approach ensured asset protection from creditor claims and lawsuits, as well as enabled asset succession planning without the risk of forced inheritance.

Overseas Company Registration: Choosing Jurisdiction and Tax Aspects

Registering companies abroad is a key stage in building effective asset protection. COREDO practice confirms: jurisdiction selection should consider not only the tax aspects of funds and trusts but also transparency requirements, resilience to external legal threats, and opportunities for international tax optimization.
For foreign investors, popular tools remain LLCs in the USA, offshore companies in Cyprus, Estonia, and Singapore. Important: individual operating agreements for LLCs allow adapting the structure to specific business tasks, while the integration of legal structures in the EU and Asia provides flexibility and protection for liquid investment assets.

Practical Mechanisms for Protecting Assets from External and Internal Threats

Illustration for the section "Practical Mechanisms for Protecting Assets from External and Internal Threats" in the article "How to Protect Company Assets with International Legal Tools"

Modern threats, lawsuits against business, raider seizures, corporate debts – require not only legal but also operational solutions. Company asset protection is impossible without implementing corporate risk management, limiting shareholder liabilities, and constant monitoring of external and internal threats.

How to Use LLCs and Holding Structures to Minimize Risks

LLC for foreign investors is a universal tool that allows implementing limited shareholder liability and protecting operating assets from external claims. In one COREDO project for a client from the EU, a holding structure with several LLCs was established, each responsible for a separate business direction. Individual operating agreements and clear function divisions between the operating company and holding allowed reducing the risks of corporate debts and ensured the protection of liquid investment assets even when multi-jurisdictional barriers arise.

Protocols and Internal Regulations: How to Ensure the Resilience of a Multi-Level Structure

Without clear protocols for business entity segregation and corporate agreements, even the most well-thought-out structure becomes vulnerable. The COREDO team implemented a set of internal regulations for a large Asian group, including due diligence procedures, compliance and AML procedures, as well as algorithms for monitoring corporate risks in the EU and Asia. This ensured the structure’s resilience amidst legislative changes and allowed for timely responses to external threats.

Intellectual Property Protection and Asset Ownership Confidentiality

Protection of intellectual property through foreign structures is a mandatory element of international expansion. Using funds and trusts not only ensures corporate confidentiality and protection of beneficial ownership but also implements modern risk monitoring technologies. In one of COREDO’s cases, a client integrated software rights into a Singapore fund structure, avoiding asset loss during international litigation.

International Court Decisions, Compliance, and AML: How Not to Lose Assets

Illustration for the section "International Court Decisions, Compliance, and AML: How Not to Lose Assets" in the article "How to Protect Company Assets with International Legal Tools"

In globalization conditions, company assets may become the subject of recovery under international court decisions. Legal business support requires not only procedural knowledge but also the ability to manage multi-jurisdictional barriers, integrate due diligence standards, and build effective AML procedures.

How International Legal Mechanisms Operate and How to Manage Them

International court decisions and assets – one of the most complex topics for entrepreneurs. The solution developed at COREDO for a client with assets in the EU and Asia included creating a multi-level structure where assets were distributed across jurisdictions with different protection levels against external claims. This approach minimized the risks of forced court decision enforcement and preserved control over key assets even when lawsuits against the business arise.

AML Procedures and Compliance: Requirements, Risks, and Implementation Practices

Modern demands for compliance and AML for protecting assets abroad are becoming increasingly stringent. Implementing international due diligence standards and integrating AML procedures in the corporate structure: an obligatory condition for sustainable company asset protection. COREDO’s practice shows: only regular audits, transparency of corporate agreements, and the implementation of modern risk monitoring algorithms meet regulator expectations and ensure the long-term sustainability of the business.

Mistakes and Risks in Structuring International Asset Protection

Illustration for the section "Mistakes and Risks in Structuring International Asset Protection" in the article "How to Protect Company Assets with International Legal Tools"

Even the most advanced tools do not guarantee protection if mistakes are made during the structuring phase or if corporate risk management is lacking. Asset loss is often linked to insufficient due diligence, lack of internal regulations, and improper asset succession planning between generations.

Typical Mistakes in Creating International Structures and How to Avoid Them

COREDO’s experience shows: the most common mistakes include choosing a jurisdiction without considering tax ramifications, lack of protocols for business entity segregation, and ignoring transparency requirements. In one case, a client lost part of their assets due to a lack of internal regulations and inefficient compliance procedure integration. The solution is regular audits of the structure, implementing corporate agreements, and continuously updating due diligence.

Risks of Asset Transfer Between Generations and Succession Planning

Asset succession planning is a separate task for international business. Without using funds for asset transfer and considering forced inheritance risks, a company becomes vulnerable to external claims and internal conflicts. The COREDO team implemented a structure for a family group in the EU with a fund clearly outlining asset transfer mechanisms between generations, trustee appointment, and corporate risk management protocols.

Practical Steps and Recommendations for Protecting Company Assets

Illustration for the section "Practical Steps and Recommendations for Protecting Company Assets" in the article "How to Protect Company Assets with International Legal Tools"
Effective asset protection requires not only choosing the right tools but also clearly implementing strategy at every stage.

Algorithm for Implementing an International Asset Protection Structure

  1. Analyze corporate risks and determine priority assets for protection.
  2. Select the optimal jurisdiction for registering the holding structure and operating companies.
  3. Develop individual operating agreements and corporate protocols.
  4. Appoint a professional managing company and implement compliance and AML procedures.
  5. Integrate legal structures of the EU and Asia to ensure flexibility and resilience.
  6. Conduct regular structure audits, update due diligence, and monitor legislative changes.

Criteria for Selecting Jurisdiction and Managing Company

  • Resistance to external legal threats and lawsuits.
  • Opportunities for international tax optimization and protection of liquid assets.
  • Transparency requirements, AML, and compliance procedures.
  • Access to modern risk monitoring technologies and capital management.
  • Reputation and experience of a professional managing company in the chosen jurisdiction.

Key Conclusions and Actionable Advice for Entrepreneurs and Managers

Asset protection is not a one-time task but a comprehensive strategy requiring constant improvement. International legal instruments like corporate trusts, funds, multi-level structures, and compliance procedure integration allow minimizing risks and ensure long-term business sustainability.

Practical advice from COREDO:

  • Build a structure considering multi-jurisdictional barriers and transparency requirements.
  • Use business trusts and funds for asset protection and succession planning.
  • Implement corporate agreements, internal regulations, and modern risk monitoring technologies.
  • Regularly review the structure, integrating new corporate risk management tools and aligning with international due diligence standards.
  • Rely on professional managing companies with experience in the EU, Asia, and the CIS to ensure time savings, process transparency, and long-term asset protection.
My experience and COREDO practice show: only a comprehensive, flexible, and professionally implemented approach allows entrepreneurs and managers to maintain business control amidst global challenges and ensure sustainable company development in the international market.

In 2024, the volume of transactions in stablecoins exceeded $10 trillion: this is more than the annual GDP of most countries in the world. Over the past three years, the percentage of companies integrating USDT and USDC into their corporate finances has more than doubled. Why? Because stable cryptocurrencies have become not just a trend but the foundation for fast, transparent, and global transactions.

Today entrepreneurs and financial directors face a paradox: on one hand, the desire for innovation, on the other: increasing requirements for compliance, transparency, and risk management. How to choose between USDT and USDC for international transactions? How to ensure security, liquidity, and compliance with regulatory standards?

In this article, I, Nikita Veremeiev, CEO of COREDO, share the practical experience of the COREDO team in implementing stablecoins into the business processes of clients from the EU, Asia, and the CIS. We will examine the key differences between USDT and USDC, assess risks and advantages, and most importantly: offer strategic insights for your business. If you are looking for practical solutions and a deep understanding, I recommend reading to the end: here you will find answers that will help you make decisions at the level of international corporate governance.

Main differences between USDT and USDC for business

Illustration for the section "Main differences between USDT and USDC for business" in the article "What is the difference between USDC and USDT and why the latter is more popular"

Issuers and reserve backing structure

USDT is issued by Tether Limited, and USDC by the CENTRE consortium, founded by Circle and Coinbase. In practice, this means differences in reserve management and backing approaches.

  • USDT is backed by a combination of assets: bank reserves, short-term US Treasury bills, commercial paper, and other instruments. However, Tether’s reserve structure has historically raised questions from auditors and regulators. Despite regular reports, the level of transparency is limited: third-party auditors are engaged irregularly, and the issuer’s financial statements do not always disclose the full composition of assets.
  • USDC is backed exclusively by highly liquid assets: bank reserves and short-term US Treasury bills. Audit and reporting of USDC reserves are conducted monthly by independent auditors, allowing corporate clients to gain maximum transparency and confidence in asset stability.
COREDO practice confirms: for companies focused on long-term corporate liquidity management and compliance with international standards, the transparency of reserve structures becomes a critical factor when choosing a stablecoin.

Transparency and regulation of stablecoins

In recent years, the regulation of stablecoins in the US, EU, and Asia is tightening. For corporate clients, this means the need to verify the origin of funds, undergo KYC procedures, and comply with AML compliance.

  • USDT has faced claims from regulators related to insufficient reserve transparency and a history of legal disputes. Despite this, Tether has strengthened compliance control and started publishing more detailed reports; however, the level of transparency still falls short of USDC.
  • USDC was initially created as a compliance-oriented product. The issuer Circle fully complies with AML/KYC requirements, and the issuer’s financial statements are regularly audited by independent auditors. This facilitates the integration of USDC into corporate processes, especially for companies operating in strictly regulated jurisdictions in the EU and Asia.
A solution developed at COREDO for clients from Europe often relies on choosing USDC as the main stablecoin for companies where the priority is the transparency of financial operations and compliance with international standards.

Technological differences and blockchain support

Both stablecoins are supported on multiple blockchains, providing flexibility for integration into corporate fintech solutions.

  • USDT is available on Ethereum, Tron, BNB Chain, Solana, and other networks. This provides maximum multi-blockchain support and minimizes transaction costs, especially when using Tron.
  • USDC is also supported on Ethereum, Solana, Avalanche, Algorand, and several other blockchains. However, in some networks, USDC’s liquidity is lower than USDT, which can affect the cost and speed of cross-border transactions.
COREDO experience shows: the choice of blockchain for corporate transactions depends on the balance between speed, transaction costs, and security requirements. For large international companies, multi-blockchain support becomes a strategic advantage when scaling the business.

Why USDT is more popular than USDC: analysis of market capitalization and liquidity

Illustration for the section "Why USDT is more popular than USDC: analysis of market capitalization and liquidity" in the article "What is the difference between USDC and USDT and why the latter is more popular"

Scale of distribution and liquidity on exchanges

USDT holds leading positions in market capitalization and liquidity among all stablecoins. On most crypto exchanges, USDT is the main instrument for settlements, trading, and fund withdrawals.

  • USDT liquidity is maximum on major exchanges: in terms of trading volume and the number of supported pairs, it surpasses USDC multiple times. This is critical for companies that need to quickly conduct large international payments and manage corporate liquidity in real-time.
  • USDC shows high liquidity in the B2B segment and among fintech companies, but in terms of trading volume, it lags behind USDT. In corporate transactions, USDC is more commonly chosen by companies prioritizing compliance and transparency over maximum transaction speed.
The COREDO team has implemented projects where USDT was used for instant cross-border transactions, especially in Asian and CIS countries, where liquidity on local exchanges is critical for business.

Trust factors and user preferences

Despite questions about Tether’s reserve transparency, USDT continues to dominate thanks to its historically established infrastructure and resilience to market volatility. For many companies, the trust factor is determined not only by transparency but also by the practical ability to quickly perform operations with minimal costs.

  • USDT is chosen for its speed, liquidity, and broad support on exchanges and OTC platforms.
  • USDC is becoming the standard for corporate clients focused on long-term reliability, minimization of blockage risks, and meeting regulatory requirements.
COREDO practice shows: to diversify corporate reserves and strategic planning, it is optimal to use both stablecoins, distributing risks and quickly responding to changes in market infrastructure.

Transparency, compliance, and audit: how to choose a stablecoin for business

Illustration for the section "Transparency, compliance, and audit: how to choose a stablecoin for business" in the article "What is the difference between USDC and USDT and why the latter is more popular"

Impact of reserve transparency on trust and compliance

  • USDC provides maximum transparency: monthly audits, publication of financial statements, independent third-party auditors. This is critically important for companies undergoing international audits and working with corporate clients from the EU and Asia.
  • USDT publishes reserve reports, but their detail and frequency lag behind USDC. For companies where reserve transparency is a key criterion, USDT may not comply with internal compliance control policies.
Solutions developed at COREDO for clients with high compliance requirements often include the integration of USDC as the main tool for corporate transactions, especially when working with banks and financial institutions.

AML/KYC and regulation in the EU, Asia, and the US

  • USDC fully complies with AML/KYC requirements, confirmed by regular audits and a transparent issuer structure. This facilitates compliance procedures when working with European and Asian banks.
  • USDT has strengthened AML compliance in recent years, but its history of legal disputes and reserve transparency questions can complicate integration into the business processes of companies operating in strictly regulated jurisdictions.
COREDO experience showed: for companies operating in the EU, the optimal choice is USDC, whereas for markets with less stringent regulation, USDT may be preferred due to liquidity and transaction speed.

Practical aspects of implementing USDT and USDC in corporate processes

Illustration for the section "Practical aspects of implementing USDT and USDC in corporate processes" in the article "What is the difference between USDC and USDT and why the latter is more popular"

Cases of stablecoin usage in Europe and Asia

Implementing stablecoins into business processes is not just a technological novelty but a strategic tool for managing corporate liquidity and optimizing international transactions.

  • In one of COREDO’s projects for a fintech company from the Czech Republic, USDC integration accelerated settlements with European counterparts and reduced currency operation costs.
  • For a client from Singapore, the COREDO team implemented a corporate settlement scheme through USDT, ensuring instant transfers between Asian and European branches, minimizing currency risks, and increasing transparency of financial flows.
In both cases, a key factor for success was the competent setup of corporate wallets, custodial services, and compliance controls.

Risks of blocking and freezing funds, safety recommendations

  • USDT is subject to blocking risks at the issuer level and individual blockchains, especially when suspected of AML/KYC violations.
  • USDC features a stricter but transparent blocking mechanism, reducing risks for companies complying with compliance.
To ensure the security of corporate funds, the COREDO team recommends:

  • Use multiblockchain wallets supporting USDT and USDC.
  • Regularly update compliance control procedures.
  • Diversify reserves among several stablecoins.
  • Apply custodial services with independent audits.

Comparison Table of USDT and USDC for business

Criteria USDT (Tether) USDC (Circle)
Market Capitalization Higher Lower
Liquidity Maximum, top-1 on exchanges High, but lower than USDT
Reserve Transparency Limited, periodic reports Regular audits, maximum transparency
Regulatory Status Had issues, compliance strengthening Full compliance with requirements
Blockchains Ethereum, Tron, BNB Chain, and others Ethereum, Solana, and others
Popularity among Businesses Maximum Growing among corporate clients
Blocking Risks Medium Lower
Suitable for High-liquidity operations, trading Compliance-critical corporate transactions

Key conclusions and practical recommendations for entrepreneurs

Illustration for the section "Key conclusions and practical recommendations for entrepreneurs" in the article "What is the difference between USDC and USDT and why the latter is more popular"
The choice between USDT and USDC depends on business tasks, geography of operations, and compliance requirements.

  • USDT is optimal for companies that value maximum liquidity, transaction speed, and a broad selection of blockchains. This is the solution for high-turnover operations, trading, and markets with less stringent regulations.
  • USDC: is the choice for companies where reserve transparency, compliance with AML/KYC, and long-term reliability are critical. It is especially relevant for businesses in the EU and Asia, where financial reporting and compliance requirements are maximal.
Recommendations from COREDO:

  • Diversify corporate reserves between USDT and USDC.
  • For international settlements with large sums, use USDT but do not neglect risk control tools.
  • For integration into banking and fintech solutions in the EU and Asia, prioritize USDC.
  • Implement corporate wallets with multiblockchain support and set up custodial services with independent audits.
  • Regularly update compliance procedures and monitor regulatory changes in your jurisdiction.

FAQ: Answers to key questions from entrepreneurs about USDT and USDC

How to choose a stablecoin for a company’s international transactions?

Evaluate the geography of operations, compliance and liquidity requirements. For markets with high regulatory burdens – USDC, for maximum liquidity – USDT.

What integration technologies for stablecoins are most effective for companies?

Use corporate wallets with multiblockchain support, custodial services with independent audits, integration with ERP and fintech platforms.

How to ensure AML compliance when using USDT?

Implement KYC procedures for all counterparts, track the origin of funds, use transaction monitoring services, and regularly update compliance policy.

What are the risks associated with using USDT for corporate settlements?

Main risks include limited reserve transparency, potential blocking of funds at the issuer level, and compliance issues in some jurisdictions.

Why does USDT remain more popular than USDC among entrepreneurs?

Thanks to maximum liquidity, broad support on exchanges, and minimal transaction costs, especially in the Asian and CIS segments.

How to reduce risks when using stablecoins in international transactions?

Diversify reserves, implement multiblockchain solutions, use custodial services, regularly conduct audits, and update compliance procedures.

What are the long-term consequences for corporate clients when choosing USDT over USDC?

USDT offers speed and liquidity but requires more rigorous risk control. USDC bets on transparency, compliance, and long-term reliability, especially with tightening regulations.
COREDO experience shows: A strategic approach to choosing and implementing stablecoins not only optimizes international transactions but also enhances corporate financial resilience to regulatory and market risks. If you are looking for solutions that work in real market conditions of the EU, Asia, and CIS – the COREDO team is ready to share practice and support your business at each stage of digital transformation.
In 2024, the global volume of chargebacks exceeded $100 billion, and this figure continues to grow with the development of e-commerce and digital payments. Every third company operating in an international environment has faced transaction disputes, and over 60% of consumers have initiated a card refund at least once.

Why has the chargeback become an integral part of the modern financial system? How does this tool affect consumer protection and business sustainability? And why is strategic chargeback management not only a matter of financial compliance but also survival in the global market?

In practice, the COREDO team has encountered situations where even experienced entrepreneurs lost tens of thousands of euros due to incorrect chargeback processing or ignoring acquiring and payment system nuances. Meanwhile, the competent use of chargebacks allows not only to recover funds in cases of card fraud but also to build effective client interest protection and minimize reputational and financial risks.

In this article, I will analyze in detail what a chargeback is, how the card refund procedure works, the strategic challenges companies and consumers face in Europe, Asia, and Africa, and share practical recommendations based on COREDO’s experience. If you want to not only understand chargebacks but learn to use them as a protection and growth tool, I recommend reading this guide to the end.

What is a chargeback and how does the card refund process work?

Illustration for the section "What is a chargeback and how does the card refund process work" in the article "What is a chargeback and how to use them correctly as a consumer"

Basic principles and stages of the chargeback process

A chargeback is a transaction dispute mechanism that allows a cardholder to initiate a refund through the issuing bank if the service was not provided, the item not delivered, or fraud occurred. The chargeback process is regulated by international payment systems (Visa, Mastercard, UnionPay) and includes several key stages:
  • Chargeback initiation: The client submits a claim to their issuing bank, stating the reason for the dispute (chargeback reason codes).
  • Bank investigation: The issuing bank analyzes documents, requests information from the acquirer (merchant’s bank), and initiates the chargeback dispute process.
  • Refund: If the claim is justified, the funds are temporarily returned to the client’s card (chargeback life cycle).
  • Chargeback representment: If the seller disagrees with the chargeback, they can provide counter-evidence.
  • Arbitration: In complicated cases, the dispute is transferred to the payment system for a final decision (arbitration chargeback).
COREDO’s practice confirms: the success of a chargeback depends on the correct documentation, timely responses, and understanding of payment system rules in each jurisdiction.

When can you initiate a chargeback: typical reasons

The most common reasons for chargebacks include:
  • Credit card fraud: Unauthorized charges, data theft, chargeback fraud.
  • Service not provided or item not delivered: A classic case for e-commerce and online subscriptions.
  • Double charging: Technical acquiring failure.
  • Contract breach: Product not matching the description, refusal to refund.
  • Consumer fraud: When a client abuses the chargeback procedure.
A real case from COREDO’s practice: a European SaaS provider faced massive chargebacks on service subscriptions due to incorrect communication of auto-renewal terms. Proper handling of the chargeback dispute process and implementing a transparent refund policy reduced the chargeback ratio below the critical threshold of payment systems.

Difference between a chargeback and a standard refund

A classic refund for a product or service: a voluntary action by the seller under the return payment policy. Chargeback: a forced procedure initiated through the bank and payment system when parties can’t agree directly, or fraud is involved. For businesses, it’s important to understand: a chargeback automatically triggers a bank dispute over the transaction and can affect the chargeback threshold and acquiring relationships.

How to correctly initiate a chargeback: a step-by-step instruction for consumers

Illustration for the section "How to correctly initiate a chargeback: a step-by-step instruction for consumers" in the article "What is a chargeback and how to use them correctly as a consumer"

What documents are needed for a chargeback for an online purchase and other cases

To successfully process a chargeback, you need to gather a package of documents confirming the dispute:
  • Receipts, account statements, payment confirmation
  • Correspondence with the seller (emails, chats)
  • Proof of service non-delivery/item not delivered (screenshots, tracking)
  • Contract or offer
  • Complaint letter to the seller
The solution developed by COREDO involves creating a single documentation template for different dispute categories, which significantly speeds up the bank investigation and increases the likelihood of a refund through the issuing bank.

Chargeback review times and stages in different countries and payment systems

Chargeback review times depend on the payment system and country:
  • Visa/Mastercard: Typically 30–120 days from the transaction date.
  • PSD2 (EU): Tightened requirements for chargeback life cycle times and transparency.
  • UnionPay (Asia): Extended periods up to 180 days are possible, especially for international payments.
In Europe, chargebacks often involve additional documentation requirements and mandatory pre-trial settlement. In Asia and Africa, periods can be longer, with less formalized evidence requirements. COREDO’s experience showed that prompt action and a full document package are key to success.

Common mistakes when processing a chargeback and how to avoid them

Common mistakes:

  • Incomplete document package
  • Missing submission deadlines
  • Incorrectly selected reason code
  • Lack of attempt to settle the dispute directly
COREDO practice: implementing a checklist for clients reduces the number of chargeback denials by 40%. It’s important to remember: prevention of chargeback starts with effective communication and transparent deal terms.

Chargeback for business: risks, opportunities, and best practices

Illustration for the section "Chargeback for business: risks, opportunities, and best practices" in the article "What is a chargeback and how to use them correctly as a consumer"

How chargebacks affect business: financial and reputational impacts

A high chargeback ratio threatens acquirer blocking, fines from payment systems, and loss of client trust. The chargeback threshold for most payment systems is 1%, exceeding this threshold can lead to a review of cooperation terms or even termination of the contract with the acquiring bank. Financial disputes in e-commerce and chargeback liability shift: real challenges for any international business.

How to protect your business from unwarranted chargebacks and chargeback fraud

Effective chargeback mitigation includes:
  • Implementing a multi-level KYC procedure
  • Regular transaction audits
  • Use of anti-fraud systems
  • Transparent refund policy and client communication
  • Timely response to chargeback representment
The COREDO team implemented projects for automating the chargeback dispute process for large e-commerce platforms, which reduced costs of refund payouts and minimized chargeback fraud.

Integration of chargeback processes with AML/KYC and compliance policies

Modern PSD2 standards and international financial compliance requirements oblige companies to integrate chargeback procedures with AML and KYC policies. This not only reduces the risk of consumer fraud but also increases the transparency of financial risk management. COREDO’s experience showed that automating chargeback monitoring and implementing a risk-based approach allow companies to quickly detect anomalies and prevent chargeback fraud at early stages.

Characteristics of chargebacks in Europe, Asia, and Africa: international nuances

Illustration for the section "Characteristics of chargebacks in Europe, Asia, and Africa: international nuances" in the article "What is a chargeback and how to use them correctly as a consumer"

Comparison Table: main differences in chargeback across jurisdictions

Region Review times Document requirements Features
Europe 30–90 days Detailed, per PSD2 Strict compliance, consumer protection
Asia 30–120 days Depends on the country Restrictions may apply to transaction types
Africa 30–180 days Often simplified Dependence on local regulations
Chargeback reason codes and requirements of issuing banks can vary significantly. For example, chargeback for non-EU residents requires additional identity verification and source of funds confirmation. In international transactions, payment system rules and local refund standards play a crucial role.

Practical recommendations: how to effectively use chargebacks and minimize risks

Illustration for the section "Practical recommendations: how to effectively use chargebacks and minimize risks" in the article "What is a chargeback and how to use them correctly as a consumer"

Checklist for consumers and businesses

  • Check return conditions before payment
  • Keep all transaction documents
  • In case of a dispute: first, try to settle the issue with the seller
  • If there is no result: initiate a chargeback through the issuing bank
  • Use chargeback documentation templates developed by experts
  • For businesses: implement regular chargeback audits and monitor the chargeback ratio
  • Integrate chargeback mitigation into the company’s risk management

Key takeaways and actionable advice for entrepreneurs and managers

  • Chargeback, not only consumer protection but also a strategic risk management tool for businesses
  • Proper chargeback mitigation reduces costs, protects reputation, and strengthens relationships with payment providers
  • Integration of chargeback processes with AML/KYC and compliance policies is a mandatory standard for international companies
  • Use chargeback analytics to identify trends and optimize refund costs
  • COREDO is ready to offer tailored solutions for chargeback automation and support in any jurisdiction

Frequently Asked Questions about Chargebacks (FAQ)

What to do if the bank denied a chargeback?
It is recommended to request a written justification for the refusal, prepare additional evidence, and if necessary, initiate an arbitration chargeback through the payment system.

What are the review times for chargebacks in Europe and Asia?
On average, 30–90 days for Europe and 30–120 days for Asia, but times depend on the specific payment system and the type of dispute.

Can a chargeback be initiated for a legal entity?
Yes, but documentation and dispute justification requirements are higher for businesses, especially in B2B transactions and international payments.

How to protect a business from chargeback fraud?
Implement multi-level customer identification, use anti-fraud systems, train staff, and regularly analyze the chargeback ratio.

How is a chargeback related to VAT refunds and tax reporting?
In some countries, refunding funds via chargeback may require adjusting tax reporting and VAT refund. COREDO practice: we recommend consulting tax experts for large refund transactions.

What modern technologies automate chargeback investigations?
Specialized SaaS platforms, integration with acquiring, AI algorithms for detecting chargeback fraud, and analytics dashboards for monitoring the chargeback life cycle are used.

Effective chargeback management is not only about protecting the client’s interests but also a strategic factor in the resilience of international business. Solutions developed by the COREDO team enable companies and entrepreneurs not just to react to chargebacks but to use this tool for growth, trust, and long-term success.

Did you know that according to the European Banking Association, the volume of online payments in Europe exceeded 1.5 trillion euros in 2024, and the share of international acquiring for e-commerce grew by 17% over the year? Such growth is not just numbers. It’s a challenge for any online business striving to scale, work with customers worldwide, and meet strict security and compliance standards.

Why is connecting European acquiring becoming a strategic issue for companies from Europe, Asia, and the CIS? The answer is simple: without reliable internet acquiring in Europe, it’s impossible to ensure fast, secure, and transparent online payments for businesses, which means losing competitiveness in the global market.

But what lies behind this “acquiring” in practice? What risks, requirements, and nuances await entrepreneurs at every stage? I am Nikita Veremeev, founder of COREDO, and together with my team, we have helped dozens of clients navigate the journey from company registration to obtaining a license and connecting acquiring in the EU, UK, Singapore, and Dubai. In this article, I share practical strategies that truly work. Read to the end to get not only a clear guide but also an understanding of how to avoid key mistakes and choose the best solution for your business.

Basic Concepts and Participants of Acquiring in Europe

European acquiring is a complex online payments system involving:
  • Acquiring bank: a financial institution that opens a merchant account for your business and provides transaction processing.
  • Payment gateway: a technological platform integrated with a website or e-commerce platform, ensuring the transmission of payment data between the buyer, acquiring bank, and payment systems.
  • Fintech providers and payment aggregators: modern alternatives to classic banks, offering flexible solutions for internet acquiring in Europe, including white label acquiring, escrow services, and multi-currency settlements.
For foreign companies and non-EU residents, choosing an acquiring bank and complying with PSD2, PCI DSS, and integrating modern customer authentication tools (3D Secure, two-factor authentication) are crucial.

How Internet Acquiring Works in Europe

The process of accepting online payments in Europe involves several technological and legal stages:
  • The client makes a payment on the site, data is transmitted through the payment gateway where customer authentication occurs.
  • The acquiring bank checks the transaction using anti-fraud systems, risk scoring, and PSD2 mechanisms.
  • Once approved, the funds are credited to the merchant account, and then to the company’s settlement account in the EU.
Acquiring integration with the site is usually implemented via the provider’s API documentation, allowing for quick connection of recurring payments, automated reconciliation, and multi-currency operations. COREDO’s practice shows that SaaS platforms, marketplaces, and B2B services critically need providers with custom payment page options and SEPA payment support.

Requirements for Connecting Acquiring in Europe for Online Business

Illustration for the section "Requirements for Connecting Acquiring in Europe for Online Business" in the article "How to Get European Acquiring for Online Business in 2025"

Documentation and Legal Requirements for Acquiring

Connecting acquiring in Europe requires preparing a package of documents, which may vary depending on jurisdiction and business type:
  • Company registration in Europe: most acquiring banks require a local or European entity with a confirmed legal address.
  • KYC/AML procedures: foundational documents, information about beneficiaries, business model description, source of funds confirmation (customer due diligence) are necessary.
  • Merchant onboarding: banks and fintech providers conduct a thorough check of compliance officer, MCC (merchant category code), as well as evaluate risks according to the business model.
COREDO’s experience shows that for companies from the CIS and Asia aiming for e-commerce acquiring in the EU, it is crucial to prepare all documents in advance according to PSD2 and GDPR requirements to minimize rejection chances.

AML/KYC and Compliance: How to Adhere to EU Standards

Adhering to AML/KYC standards is a key factor for successfully connecting acquiring. European banks and fintech companies implement multi-level risk scoring, KYC automation, and require the implementation of a proprietary AML policy for online business.
  • Compliance officer must be appointed for transaction monitoring, reporting, and interaction with regulators.
  • Fraud prevention and anti-fraud systems: mandatory for all companies working with high-risk merchant accounts and cross-border payments.
  • GDPR and personal data protection: integration with payment systems must comply with European standards for data storage and processing.
At COREDO, we develop individual AML policies and support clients at all merchant onboarding stages, which accelerates the process and reduces rejection risks from the acquiring bank.

How to Choose and Connect European Acquiring: Step-by-Step Guide

Illustration for the section "How to Choose and Connect European Acquiring: Step-by-Step Guide" in the article "How to Get European Acquiring for Online Business in 2025"

Criteria for Choosing an Acquiring Provider for Online Business

Choosing an acquiring provider is a strategic decision influencing conversion, security, and profitability of online business. Key considerations:
  • Geography and support for foreign companies: not all banks provide acquiring for non-residents, especially startups and SaaS platforms.
  • Multi-currency settlements and SEPA payments: crucial for international acquiring and cross-border payments.
  • Commission fees and rolling reserve conditions: consider transaction fees, hidden charges, settlement delay, and minimum turnover requirements.
  • High-risk merchant account: if the business is in a high-risk category, support for anti-fraud systems and extended risk scoring is necessary.
  • White label solutions and custom payment pages: relevant for marketplaces, B2B, and B2C platforms.

# Comparison of European Acquiring Services

Provider Countries of Operation Commission Minimum Turnover High-Risk Support Multi-Currency Features
Bank A EU 1.2% €10,000 Yes Yes Fast onboarding
Fintech B EU, Asia 1.5% €0 No Yes White label
Aggregator C EU, CIS 1.8% €5,000 Yes No Escrow
The solution developed at COREDO allows selecting the optimal provider based on industry specifics, turnover, and client geography.

Step-by-Step Process for Connecting Acquiring

  1. Analyze business model and acquiring requirements: determine MCC, volumes, payment geography.
  2. Register a company and settlement account in the EU: COREDO’s practice confirms that having a European entity speeds up merchant onboarding.
  3. Collect and submit documents for KYC/AML: founding documents, address confirmation, AML process descriptions.
  4. Merchant onboarding journey: pass risk scoring, agree on limits, rolling reserve, and compliance officer configuration.
  5. Integrate acquiring API: connect to the website, ERP/CRM, set up recurring payments, and customize payment pages.
  6. Testing and launch: check anti-fraud systems, customer authentication, monitor initial transactions.
COREDO’s experience has shown that KYC automation and integration with payment aggregators reduce acquiring connection time for SaaS and e-commerce to 2-3 weeks.

Acquiring Integration with Website and E-Commerce Platform

Integrating acquiring with CMS and ERP/CRM requires not just technical expertise but also consideration of security requirements:
  • Use provider’s API documentation for seamless integration.
  • Implement 3D Secure, PCI DSS compliance, regularly update anti-fraud systems.
  • Customize payment pages to fit the company’s brand, support recurring billing, and automate reconciliation.
The COREDO team has implemented acquiring integration projects with B2B platforms and marketplaces, where key requirements included support for escrow solutions, multi-currency settlements, and instant SEPA payments.

Fees, Risks, and Security of Internet Acquiring in Europe

Illustration for the section "Fees, Risks, and Security of Internet Acquiring in Europe" in the article "How to Get European Acquiring for Online Business in 2025"

Commission Structure and Hidden Fees

Acquiring fees in the EU consist of:
  • Transaction fees (usually 1.2–2.5% depending on turnover and business type)
  • Rolling reserve (reserving a portion of turnover for 3–6 months)
  • Settlement delay (payout delay – 1–5 days)
  • Hidden fees for chargebacks, multi-currency operations, API integration
How to reduce fees: COREDO’s practice – negotiations with providers, choosing fintech aggregators with a transparent fee structure, optimizing business processes to reduce chargebacks.

Risk Management, Chargeback, and Anti-Fraud

Chargeback risks are one of the main issues of international acquiring. Effective management includes:
  • Implementing a chargeback management system and fraud prevention services
  • Using 3D Secure, two-factor authentication, automatic risk scoring
  • Training personnel on working with returns and payment disputes
Projects implemented by COREDO have shown that for high-risk merchant accounts, it’s critical to integrate automated transaction monitoring systems and regularly update the AML policy.

Security and Data Protection of Clients

Security of internet acquiring in Europe is built on:
  • PCI DSS compliance, a mandatory standard for all payment process participants
  • GDPR: strict requirements for processing and storing personal data of EU clients
  • Customer authentication: implementing modern authentication methods and monitoring suspicious operations
COREDO’s recommendation: regularly audit the IT infrastructure, update security policies, and use certified payment gateways.

Specific Features of Acquiring for Different Business Models in the EU

Illustration for the section "Specific Features of Acquiring for Different Business Models in the EU" in the article "How to Get European Acquiring for Online Business in 2025"

Acquiring for B2B, B2C, SaaS, and Marketplaces

B2B and SaaS platforms have specific acquiring requirements:
  • Support for recurring payments and billing automation
  • Integration with ERP/CRM systems for reconciliation
  • Escrow solutions for marketplaces, customization of payment scenarios
Marketplaces require multi-currency settlements, instant payouts, and escrow services to protect sellers and buyers.
Real COREDO cases: successful integration of white label acquiring for SaaS platforms with support for regular payments and automated risk scoring.

White Label Acquiring and Alternative Solutions

White label acquiring is a tool for companies wishing to control the payment infrastructure and create their fintech products. Alternatives to bank acquiring include:
  • Payment aggregators with flexible integration
  • Fintech providers working on a revenue-sharing model
  • Solutions for high-risk merchant accounts with extended compliance support
COREDO’s practice: white label acquiring allows marketplaces and B2B services to quickly scale business, minimize settlement delay, and customize payment processes to their tasks.

Common Difficulties and Solutions When Connecting European Acquiring

Illustration for the section "Common Difficulties and Solutions When Connecting European Acquiring" in the article "How to Get European Acquiring for Online Business in 2025"

Rejections in Opening Merchant Accounts: Reasons and Solutions

Common reasons for rejections:
  • Non-compliance with KYC/AML requirements
  • High chargeback level or negative transaction history
  • Document errors or absence of a compliance officer
What to do: the solution developed at COREDO – preliminary document audit, preparation of an individual AML policy, selection of a provider tailored to MCC and business model specifics.

How to Accelerate Merchant Onboarding and Minimize Risks

The merchant onboarding journey can be accelerated by:
  • Automating KYC/AML procedures
  • Using customer due diligence services
  • Preparing a complete set of documents before application submission
COREDO’s experience: implementing digital onboarding and integrating with fintech providers reduces the time to connect acquiring for online businesses to 7–10 days.

Key Takeaways and Practical Recommendations for Online Business

European acquiring is not just a tool for accepting online payments but a strategic asset for scaling business in the international market. Key recommendations:
  • Select your provider carefully, considering fees, rolling reserve conditions, support for high-risk merchant accounts, and customization options.
  • Prepare documents and AML policy in advance, considering PSD2, GDPR, and EU regulators’ requirements.
  • Invest in security: PCI DSS compliance, modern anti-fraud systems, and customer authentication.
  • Use white label solutions and fintech platforms for flexibility and scaling.
  • Evaluate acquiring efficiency by KPIs: conversion, payout speed, chargeback level, transaction cost.
The COREDO team is ready to be your reliable partner at every stage, from company registration and licensing to acquiring connection and comprehensive business support in the EU, UK, Singapore, and Dubai.

If you’re looking not just for a provider but a strategic partner who understands the specifics of international acquiring and can offer tailored solutions: your next step is clear.

In 2025, over 60% of crypto-companies focusing on Europe faced the need to revise their strategy due to the tightening of MiCA and related regulatory barriers. This fact confirms: jurisdiction selection for registering a crypto-company is no longer just a tax optimization issue: it’s a strategic decision that determines market access, scaling speed, and long-term business legality.
Why are international projects forced to seek alternative jurisdictions for crypto-activities? Which countries offer flexibility, transparency, and real growth opportunities outside the constraints of MiCA? How to ensure compliance with AML requirements and investor protection without losing development pace?
In this article, I will analyze the key reasons for the migration of crypto-business beyond the EU, conduct an expert comparison of leading alternative jurisdictions, and provide step-by-step recommendations for registering and licensing crypto-companies abroad. If your goal is not just to survive in the new conditions but to use them for strategic growth, I recommend reading to the end: here, you will find not only analytics but also practical tools for decision-making.

Why are companies seeking an alternative to MiCA?

Illustration for the section "Why are companies seeking an alternative to MiCA?" in the article "Alternative Jurisdictions for Crypto Activities, instead of MiCA"

MiCA restrictions and risks for crypto-companies

MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) has become one of the most discussed regulatory acts of recent years. Its goal is to establish uniform standards for cryptocurrency regulation in Europe, increase transparency, and protect investors. However, in practice, MiCA imposes extremely high requirements on crypto-companies.
  • Significant tightening of AML/KYC procedures and mandatory registration of all market participants.
  • Increase in compliance costs: implementing internal control procedures and regular monitoring of transactions can increase operating expenses by 20–30%.
  • Challenges in opening accounts: EU banks are reluctant to work with crypto-companies, especially in the early stages.
  • Restrictions on issuing and circulating stablecoins, reserve requirements, and reserve confirmations.
  • Risks of transaction blocking and asset freezing with the slightest suspicion of non-compliance with AMLD5 or FATF recommendations.
Practice by COREDO confirms: for many international projects, such conditions become a barrier to market entry or a reason to migrate the business to more flexible jurisdictions.

Criteria for choosing an alternative jurisdiction

Choosing a country for registering a crypto-company: it’s a balance between legality, flexibility, and speed of launch. The most in-demand criteria are:

  • Regulation transparency and predictability: clear rules and understandable licensing procedures.
  • AML/KYC flexibility: the ability to implement modern customer identification solutions without excessive bureaucracy.
  • Speed of registration and account opening: minimal application review time and no industry discrimination.
  • Scalability opportunities: access to international markets, investor protection, support for innovations (DeFi, NFT, CBDC).
  • Interaction with regulators: openness to dialogue and willingness to consider the specifics of the crypto-business.

The COREDO team has implemented dozens of projects where these parameters determined market entry success.

Best countries to open a crypto-company in 2025

Illustration for the section "Best countries to open a crypto-company in 2025" in the article "Alternative Jurisdictions for Crypto Activities, instead of MiCA"

Europe: Switzerland, Portugal, Lithuania, Poland, Georgia

Switzerland remains a benchmark for transparency and technical support for blockchain projects. It operates under the principle of “technological neutrality,” and the FINMA regulator actively interacts with the industry. Licensing requires strict adherence to AML/KYC, but in return, companies gain access to a strong financial infrastructure and a DeFi-friendly environment. Opening accounts is challenging but achievable with a well-prepared corporate structure.

Portugal attracts with low tax burdens; until recently, cryptocurrency income was tax-free. Registering a crypto-company takes 1–2 weeks, licensing requirements are moderate, and banks are gradually opening up to working with digital assets. Special attention is paid to implementing KYC procedures and transaction monitoring.

Lithuania: a leader in registration speed and issuing licenses for crypto exchanges. Capital requirements and internal policies are quite strict, but the process is transparent and takes from 2 to 4 weeks. Interaction with the regulator takes place via an online portal, speeding up application processing.

Poland and Georgia offer a quick start for crypto startups. In Georgia, no separate license for crypto-activity is required, and the tax burden is minimal. Poland is gradually tightening rules but remains flexible for small teams and innovative projects.

Asia and Africa: Singapore, Hong Kong, UAE, Mauritius, South Africa

Singapore is one of the most attractive centers for crypto-business in Asia. Company registration requires a local director and address, but the process takes only a few days. Licensing is conducted through MAS (Monetary Authority of Singapore), and AML/KYC requirements meet international FATF standards. The introduction of CBDC and support for blockchain projects make Singapore an ideal platform for scaling.

Hong Kong is actively introducing new crypto regulation standards, including licensing exchanges and DeFi platforms. The “sandbox” principle operates here, allowing innovative products to be tested without the risk of sanctions.

UAE (Dubai, Abu Dhabi), a region with minimal tax burdens and flexible conditions for international projects. Licensing is possible through specialized zones (ADGM, DMCC), and local regulators support the introduction of new technologies.

Mauritius and South Africa are jurisdictions where licensing and AML requirements are moderate, and the tax burden is minimal. They are increasingly popular among projects focusing on Africa and the Middle East.

Latin America and Offshore: El Salvador, Panama, Seychelles

El Salvador, the first country to recognize Bitcoin as an official payment method. Company registration takes just days, no licensing required, and banks open accounts without additional checks. However, the lack of strict regulation poses risks to investor protection and long-term legality.

Panama and Seychelles – offshore jurisdictions with minimal reporting and licensing requirements. These are convenient places to launch DeFi and NFT projects, but one must consider restrictions in dealing with international banks and potential reputational risks.

Comparison of jurisdictions for crypto business

Illustration for the section "Comparison of jurisdictions for crypto business" in the article "Alternative Jurisdictions for Crypto Activities, instead of MiCA"

Table: Key parameters and requirements in top jurisdictions

Jurisdiction Licensing AML/KYC Taxes Account Opening Features
Switzerland Yes Strict Moderate Difficult Transparency, DeFi-friendly
Portugal Partial Moderate Low Average No crypto income tax
Lithuania Yes Strict Average Difficult Fast registration
Georgia No Lenient Low Easy No license, quick start
Singapore Yes Strict Average Difficult CBDC adoption
El Salvador No Lenient Low Easy Bitcoin legal tender

Taxation features for crypto-companies in Asia and Africa

In Asia and Africa, the tax burden on crypto-companies ranges from symbolic rates (Mauritius, Singapore) to progressive scales (South Africa). COREDO’s solution involves a comprehensive assessment of not only tax rates but also the structure of tax obligations for cross-border operations and asset tokenization.

AML and Compliance for Crypto Businesses in Alternative Jurisdictions

Illustration for the section "AML and Compliance for Crypto Businesses in Alternative Jurisdictions" in the article "Alternative Jurisdictions for Crypto Activities, instead of MiCA"

International standards and local requirements

FATF and AMLD5 remain the foundation for building compliance processes in most developed jurisdictions. Implementing client identification (KYC) procedures, transaction monitoring, and reporting suspicious transactions: mandatory conditions for obtaining a license and opening accounts. In some countries (e.g., Lithuania and Singapore), regulators require a separate compliance officer and automated reporting.

How to ensure compliance and protect investors

COREDO’s experience has shown that automating AML/KYC and integrating with international databases can reduce operational costs and increase transaction transparency. Implementing a risk-based approach to transaction monitoring and regular internal audits are key tools for protecting investors and minimizing account blocking risks.

Regulation of new crypto-products: Stablecoins, DeFi, NFT

Illustration for the section "Regulation of new crypto-products: Stablecoins, DeFi, NFT" in the article "Alternative Jurisdictions for Crypto Activities, instead of MiCA"

Regulation features for stablecoins and tokens

Outside the EU, the requirements for stablecoin reserve coverage and reserve confirmations vary. In the US, the “federal qualified issuer” principle applies (GENIUS Act), in Asia and offshore, more flexible approaches allow the launch of innovative products with minimal costs. However, the lack of a single standard requires careful legal restructuring of the token’s structure and investor protection mechanisms.

CBDC and blockchain technology integration into business

The integration of central bank digital currencies (CBDC) is becoming a new trend for international companies. The COREDO team has supported projects integrating CBDC into corporate payment processes, which enhanced transaction speed and reduced cross-border transfer costs. In some jurisdictions, there are pilot programs for testing CBDC in conjunction with DeFi and asset tokenization.

Practical steps: how to choose and register a crypto-company outside the EU

Step-by-step instruction on registration and licensing

  1. Business model analysis: Determine target markets, products (DeFi, NFT, stablecoins), and transaction volumes.
  2. Choose jurisdiction: Evaluate licensing requirements, AML/KYC, tax burdens, and availability of banking services.
  3. Document collection: Founding documents, business plan, AML/KYC policies, beneficiary information.
  4. Application submission and interaction with the regulator: Use online portals (e.g., ACRA in Singapore), be prepared for interviews and providing additional information.
  5. Open corporate account: In some countries, the personal presence of the director or the use of a licensed agent’s services might be required.
  6. Implement compliance procedures: Appoint a compliance officer, integrate transaction monitoring systems.

Criteria for jurisdiction selection for scaling

  • ROI: Evaluate the total costs for registration, licensing, and business maintenance.
  • Risks: Analyze legal and reputational risks associated with the jurisdiction.
  • Legality: Ensure international recognition of the license and the ability to work with major banks and payment systems.
  • Investor protection: Verify deposit insurance mechanisms and dispute resolution options.

Risks and advantages of registering a crypto-company outside the EU

Main risks: legal, financial, reputational

Registering a crypto-company outside the EU may involve:

  • Insufficient protection of investor rights and limited access to international judicial mechanisms.
  • Risks of account blocking and service denial by banks.
  • Reputational costs when operating in offshore jurisdictions.
The COREDO team encountered cases where the lack of a transparent structure and unaccounted FATF requirements led to asset freezes and the need for urgent business migration.

Advantages: flexibility, speed, tax optimization

At the same time, alternative jurisdictions allow:

  • Launching projects in 1–2 weeks with minimal costs.
  • Using tax benefits and the absence of double taxation.
  • Scaling business without restrictions on types of activities and geography.
A COREDO-completed project for launching an NFT platform in Portugal enabled the client to enter the market in 10 days and integrate DeFi modules without additional approvals.

Key conclusions and recommendations for entrepreneurs

  • Alternative jurisdictions for crypto activities: it’s not only a way to bypass MiCA’s restrictions but also an opportunity to build a sustainable business model considering global trends.
  • Best countries to open a crypto-company in 2025: Switzerland, Portugal, Lithuania, Singapore, UAE, and Georgia, each offering a unique balance between legality, flexibility, and tax optimization.
  • Registering a crypto-company abroad requires a comprehensive approach: analyzing the business model, choosing jurisdiction, implementing compliance procedures, and continuous monitoring of legislative changes.
  • To minimize risks and ensure long-term business legality, I recommend relying on the experience of professional consultants, integrating international AML/KYC standards, and building a transparent corporate structure.
COREDO’s practice confirms: a strategic approach to jurisdiction selection and competent legal support not only reduce costs but also ensure sustainable growth even amid constant changes in global regulation.
In 2024, over 70% of international companies experienced delays in opening accounts and executing cross-border payments due to tightened compliance procedures and new transparency requirements for corporate structures. At the same time, according to the latest World Bank reports, more than 60% of entrepreneurs believe that the choice of jurisdiction for international business affects access to investments, financing costs, and resilience to regulatory changes.

Why do some companies successfully scale in Europe and Asia, while others spend months agreeing on documents and face account blockages? How to ensure the legalization of income in international business, reduce tax risks, and protect assets abroad without landing on the EU and FATF blacklists? These questions become critical for anyone planning to register a company abroad or start a business in Europe, Asia, or offshore jurisdictions.

In this article, I will discuss how the COREDO team helps clients choose the optimal country for business registration in 2025, which criteria really matter, and how to avoid key mistakes when comparing business jurisdictions. If you want a practical guide to international legal support, learn about the latest trends in corporate taxation, AML compliance, and integration with international banks, I recommend reading to the end. Here, you’ll find not only analysis but also real steps verified by COREDO’s practice.

Criteria for Selecting a Jurisdiction for International Business in 2025

Illustration for the section "Criteria for Selecting a Jurisdiction for International Business in 2025" in the article "How to Choose a Jurisdiction for International Business in 2025"
Choosing a jurisdiction for international business: a strategic decision that affects not only the tax burden but also the company’s reputation, access to international settlements, and resilience to regulatory changes. At COREDO, we always start with a comprehensive analysis of the following criteria:

  • Corporate taxation: tax levels, availability of Double Tax Treaties, tax residency requirements, and CFC rules.
  • Substance requirements: need for actual presence, economic presence, influence of new EU and Asia standards.
  • AML compliance and KYC: current compliance procedures, risks of being blacklisted by the EU and FATF, automatic exchange of tax information (CRS).
  • Jurisdiction reputation: prestigious business ratings (Doing Business), reputational risks, integration with international payment systems and banks.
These parameters form the basis of COREDO’s internal due diligence methodologies for jurisdictions and risk assessments when registering companies in the EU, Asia, and offshore zones.

Corporate Taxation and Tax Risks

In 2025, corporate taxation in different countries is becoming less predictable due to global initiatives for minimum corporate tax and automatic exchange of tax information. For example, when structuring holding companies in the EU, the COREDO team considers not only nominal rates but also the presence of Double Tax Treaties, tax residency requirements, and CFC rules.
In one of COREDO’s cases for an IT company with European and Asian clients, a multi-level corporate structure was implemented using a holding in the Netherlands and operating companies in Estonia and Singapore. This approach reduced the tax burden, ensured income legalization in international business, and minimized tax risks in cross-border payments.

Substance Requirements and Real Presence

Since 2024, substance and economic presence requirements have been tightened in almost all European jurisdictions. To register a company abroad in the EU, a nominal address is no longer sufficient; an actual office, local staff, reporting, and confirmation of economic activity are required.

COREDO’s practice confirms: when choosing a jurisdiction for international business in 2025, it is important to assess in advance whether you can meet the substance requirements to avoid claims from tax authorities and banking sanctions. This is especially relevant for offshore jurisdictions, where substance becomes a key factor for opening accounts and accessing international settlements.

AML Compliance and KYC: New Standards and Risks

AML compliance and KYC remain crucial for international legal support. In 2025, banks and payment systems require not only complete disclosure of beneficial ownership but also transparency of capital sources, automatic exchange of tax information (CRS), and adherence to all compliance procedures.

The COREDO team has implemented projects where the key to success was the preliminary internal due diligence of the client and the preparation of a complete package of documents for banks and regulators. This approach minimizes the risk of account opening refusals and reduces the likelihood of blockages due to suspected AML violations.

Jurisdiction Reputation and Prestigious Rankings

The reputation of a jurisdiction is one of the main factors for attracting investments, partners, and access to international markets. Countries with high positions in Doing Business rankings, stable banking systems, and transparent compliance procedures not only protect assets abroad but also facilitate integration with international payment systems.

COREDO’s experience shows: when choosing a country for business registration, it is important to consider not only tax and legal aspects but also reputational risks associated with being listed on EU, FATF, and other regulators’ blacklists.

Comparison of Popular Jurisdictions for Company Registration in the EU, Asia, and Africa

Illustration for the section "Comparison of Popular Jurisdictions for Company Registration in the EU, Asia, and Africa" in the article "How to Choose a Jurisdiction for International Business in 2025"
Selecting the optimal country for business registration in 2025 requires a deep analysis not only of tax rates but also of substance requirements, AML compliance, banking capabilities, and reputation. In COREDO’s practice, we analyze jurisdictions in the following areas:

Best European Countries for Business Registration in 2025

For technology and IT-focused companies, Estonia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, and Poland remain relevant in 2025. Estonia offers a unique e-Residency program, allowing remote company management and integration with international payment systems. Poland and the Czech Republic attract incentives for IT and R&D, while Cyprus offers possibilities for structuring holding companies and family offices with minimal tax burdens.

Solutions developed by COREDO for European clients often include holding structures considering substance requirements and licensing requirements (e.g., for fintech and payment services).

Asian Jurisdictions: Advantages and Limitations

Singapore and Hong Kong remain key destinations for accessing Asian markets due to stable legal systems, favorable corporate taxation, and high integration with international banks. However, from 2025, requirements for real presence (local director, office, substance) and beneficiary disclosure have tightened.

COREDO’s experience shows: to open a company in Asia with minimal risks, it is important to prepare a document package for banks in advance, ensure transparency of the structure, and consider the specifics of registering companies with foreign participation.

Offshore Zones and Africa: When They Are Relevant

Offshore jurisdictions (e.g., Seychelles, Belize) lose appeal in 2025 due to enhanced AML compliance, EU blacklisting, and difficulties with opening accounts. However, for tasks of asset protection abroad, business ownership confidentiality, and family office structuring, such solutions may be justified given compliance with all substance and beneficial ownership requirements.

In Africa, Mauritius and South Africa present opportunities, offering flexible regimes for international investments, but require thorough due diligence and assessment of reputational risks.

Comparison Table of Key Jurisdictions by Main Criteria

Jurisdiction Taxation Substance Requirements AML/Compliance Reputation Account Opening Features
Estonia 0% on reinvest Minimal High High Moderate e-Residency
UAE 0-9% Required Medium Medium Easy Free zones
Seychelles 0% (IBC) Minimal Enhanced Low Difficult EU blacklisted
Poland 9-19% Required High High Easy IT incentives

Practical Aspects of Registering a Company Abroad

Illustration for the section "Practical Aspects of Registering a Company Abroad" in the article "How to Choose a Jurisdiction for International Business in 2025"

COREDO’s extensive experience confirms that the success of registering a company abroad depends on a clear step-by-step strategy, sound corporate structure planning, and adherence to all licensing requirements.

Step-by-Step Guide to Registering a Holding Company in the EU

  1. Analyze business goals and structure: Define objectives (asset management, intellectual property protection, family office).
  2. Select the optimal country considering substance requirements and tax treaties.
  3. Conduct due diligence: Check founders, capital sources, beneficial ownership.
  4. Prepare incorporation documents and register the company.
  5. Open a bank account and integrate with international payment systems.
  6. Establish corporate administration and financial monitoring systems.
In one of its recent cases, COREDO implemented a phased company registration for a holding structure in Estonia and Cyprus, followed by activity licensing and connection to European banks.

Opening a Bank Account and International Settlements

In 2025, banks in the EU and Asia require new companies to fully disclose their structure, confirm substance, and provide transparency of fund sources. COREDO’s practice shows: for successful account opening, it is important to prepare a compliance package in advance, including a business plan, due diligence documents, and confirmation of economic presence.

  1. For international settlements and currency operations, we recommend choosing jurisdictions highly integrated into SWIFT, SEPA, and other payment systems, with resilience to banking sanctions.

Adhering to AML and KYC When Registering a Business

Adhering to AML requirements when opening a company abroad: a key factor for long-term success. COREDO solutions include developing internal compliance procedures, implementing automatic tax information exchange (CRS), and regular financial monitoring.

Remote Registration and Servicing of Companies

Digital services, such as Estonian e-Residency, allow for fully remote business registration and administration, which is especially relevant for e-commerce and IT companies. The COREDO team supports clients at all stages of remote registration, ensuring full compliance with substance and corporate administration requirements.

How to Minimize Risks and Increase the Resilience of International Business

Illustration for the section "How to Minimize Risks and Increase the Resilience of International Business" in the article "How to Choose a Jurisdiction for International Business in 2025"

In the context of ongoing regulatory changes and increased transparency demands, resilience of international business requires a comprehensive approach to asset protection, tax risk management, and adherence to all compliance standards.

How to Avoid Double Taxation and Sanctions

Utilizing international tax agreements (Double Tax Treaties) and proper structuring of the corporate structure can minimize the risks of double taxation.

COREDO’s experience shows: regular audits of tax residency and structure transparency help avoid sanctions and account blockages.

Current Requirements for Transparency and Beneficial Ownership

From 2025, almost all jurisdictions require disclosure of beneficiary information, automatic exchange of tax information (CRS), and implementation of financial monitoring. COREDO solutions include building transparent corporate structures that meet the expectations of foreign investors and regulatory requirements.

The Impact of EU and FATF Blacklists on Jurisdiction Selection

A jurisdiction’s inclusion on EU or FATF blacklists leads to restrictions on international settlements, complicates account openings, and increases reputational risks. In practice, COREDO recommends avoiding company registration in countries with low reputation, even if they offer attractive tax rates.

Key Conclusions and Practical Recommendations for Choosing a Jurisdiction in 2025

Illustration for the section "Key Conclusions and Practical Recommendations for Choosing a Jurisdiction in 2025" in the article "How to Choose a Jurisdiction for International Business in 2025"
Main Selection Criteria:

  • Level of corporate taxation and presence of Double Tax Treaties
  • Substance and economic presence requirements
  • AML compliance and KYC standards
  • Jurisdiction reputation and business rankings
  • Opportunities for account opening and integration with international payment systems

Practical Tips:

  • Conduct comprehensive due diligence for jurisdictions using professional risk analysis and country comparison services.
  • Structure your business considering substance requirements and beneficial ownership transparency.
  • Regularly audit the corporate structure and comply with new regulatory requirements.
  • Utilize digital tools for remote registration and corporate administration.
  • Assess ROI not just by tax rates, but also by banking access, reputation, and resilience to regulatory changes.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Choosing a Jurisdiction for International Business

1. What criteria should be considered when choosing a jurisdiction for international business in 2025?
Key parameters: corporate taxation, substance requirements, AML compliance standards, jurisdiction reputation, opportunities for account opening, and integration with international payment systems.
2. How have substance and real presence requirements changed in the EU and Asia?
In most EU and Asian countries, from 2024, economic presence requirements have tightened: an actual office, local staff, confirmation of business activity are required.
3. Which jurisdictions offer the best conditions for asset protection and risk management in 2025?
Estonia, Cyprus, UAE, and Singapore: optimal for structuring holdings, family offices, and asset protection subject to all compliance requirements.
4. How to choose a country for company registration to simplify international settlements and bank access?
Focus on jurisdictions with high integration in SWIFT, SEPA, stable banking systems, and absence from EU and FATF blacklists.
5. What are the risks associated with registering a company in an offshore zone, and how can they be minimized?
Main risks – difficulties with account opening, increased substance requirements, reputational limitations. Risks can be minimized through transparent structure, compliance with all AML standards, and regular audits.
6. How do new AML and KYC standards affect the choice of jurisdiction for international business?
Tightening AML and KYC standards require full structure transparency, disclosure of beneficiaries, and source of funds, affecting the choice of country and corporate structure design.
7. What tools and services help analyze and compare jurisdictions for business registration?
Use professional platforms for due diligence, Doing Business rankings, FATF reports, and specialized tax and compliance risk analysis services.
Choosing a jurisdiction for international business: not just a formality but a strategic step that determines your company’s resilience, transparency, and effectiveness in the global market. COREDO’s experience shows that only a comprehensive approach, deep analysis, and professional support can achieve long-term success and minimize risks in a rapidly changing regulatory environment.

In 2024, the global volume of laundered criminal proceeds, as estimated by the FATF, exceeded $2 trillion, more than the GDP of most European countries. While EU and Asian regulators are tightening corporate compliance requirements, over 60% of international companies face delays in business registration or account opening due to insufficient AML procedures. Why do so many entrepreneurs still postpone implementing anti-money laundering systems despite the obvious risks to corporate security and reputation?

In an environment where anti-money laundering legislation is becoming increasingly complex, and regulatory requirements in the EU, Asia, and Africa demand not just formal compliance but deep integration of AML procedures into business processes, delaying their implementation can cost a company not only money but also the very right to operate in international markets.

I see every day how even experienced executives underestimate the consequences of non-compliance with AML – from multi-million dollar fines to account freezes and loss of investor trust. But there’s another side to it: implementing effective AML procedures opens access to new markets, speeds up company registration in the EU and Asia, ensures corporate security, and builds a stable reputation.

In this article, I will explain why delaying AML implementation in business is a strategic mistake, and which practical steps allow not only to comply with the requirements but also to turn compliance into a competitive advantage. If you want to understand how to minimize risks, avoid fines, and build a transparent, scalable business: read to the end.

Why implementing AML procedures is a critical element of corporate security

Illustration for the section "Why implementing AML procedures is a critical element of corporate security" in the article "6 reasons not to delay the implementation of AML procedures in business"
AML procedures are not just a formality for “checking a box”. In practice, the COREDO team has implemented dozens of projects for company registration in the EU, Asia, and the UAE, where having well-crafted anti-money laundering policies became the decisive factor for account opening and obtaining financial licenses.

Implementing compliance business processes allows:

  • Preventing financial crimes: Transaction monitoring, sanction screening, and identification of beneficial owners reduce the likelihood of involvement in money laundering schemes.
  • Ensuring corporate transparency: Modern due diligence procedures and PEP screening build trust with banks, partners, and investors.
  • Strengthening corporate compliance: Internal compliance policies become part of the corporate culture, which is especially important for international companies.

Our experience at COREDO has shown: companies that integrate AML procedures early significantly reduce legal support costs and minimize the risks of account freezes.

Key reasons to implement AML procedures in business right now

Illustration for the section "Key reasons to implement AML procedures in business right now" in the article "6 reasons not to delay the implementation of AML procedures in business"

Reducing money laundering and financial crime risks

Illustration for the section "Reducing money laundering and financial crime risks" in the article "6 reasons not to delay the implementation of AML procedures in business"
Anti-money laundering legislation in all leading jurisdictions (EU, Asia, UK, UAE) requires not only a formal presence of an AML policy but also real control over financial operations. Implementing a risk-based approach, regular financial monitoring, and automation of suspicious activity reporting (SAR) allows for the early detection of suspicious transactions.

In one of COREDO’s cases, a client in the field of international trade faced account blockages at a European bank due to the lack of transparent procedures for identifying beneficial owners. Implementing a comprehensive AML policy and automating transaction monitoring not only restored account access but also allowed for a subsequent AML audit to be passed without remarks.

Avoiding fines and sanctions for non-compliance with AML

Regulatory fines for AML non-compliance in 2024–2025 reached record highs: in the EU, amounts exceed €10 million, in Asia – up to 5% of the company’s annual turnover. In Africa, where regulatory requirements are only getting stricter, the first cases of blocking assets of international companies have already been recorded.

COREDO’s practice confirms: automating compliance and implementing digital tools for AML audits allows not only to reduce costs but also to ensure timely response to legislative changes. For example, in a project for licensing a fintech company in Estonia, KYC procedure automation helped avoid fines for overdue client data updates.

Simplifying company registration and account opening abroad

In 2025, banks and regulators in the EU and Asia require new companies not only to provide the standard set of documents but also to have a well-developed AML policy, due diligence procedures, and digital client identification. Without this, company registration in the EU or account opening in Singapore, Dubai, or the UK can be delayed for months or become impossible.

A solution developed by COREDO for a startup in the Czech Republic included integrating AML requirements into the preparation of incorporation documents. This accelerated the registration process and obtained a payment service license without additional requests from the regulator.

Protecting reputation and investor trust

Managing reputational risks through AML: a key factor for attracting investments and entering new markets. The absence of transparent procedures for combating money laundering becomes a reason for banks, funds, and strategic partners to refuse cooperation.

In one of COREDO’s cases, a company in the e-commerce sector lost a contract with a major European investor due to insufficiently developed corporate ethics and financial operation control procedures. Implementing a comprehensive AML policy, integrating KYC, and employee training restored trust and successfully closed the deal within 6 months.

Business scalability and technological resilience

Automating AML processes is not only about reducing costs but also about scaling a business without losing control quality. Using modern technologies (AI-driven transaction monitoring, digital client identification, AML compliance outsourcing) provides flexibility and resilience when entering new markets.

The COREDO team implemented solutions for fintech companies in the UK and Singapore, where compliance automation reduced operating expenses by 30% and doubled the effectiveness of detecting suspicious operations. This is especially relevant for startups and companies with a distributed structure.

Compliance with new AML requirements in 2025

In 2025, updated FATF and EU and Asia regulators’ requirements came into force: rules for identifying beneficial owners were tightened, new standards for digital identification and sanction screening were introduced, and requirements for internal compliance policies and personal data protection (AML and GDPR) were expanded.

COREDO’s practice shows: companies that pre-emptively adapt their processes to new standards gain a competitive advantage: the ability to quickly enter new markets, obtain licenses, and attract international partners.

Practical steps for implementing AML procedures for international business

Illustration for the section "Practical steps for implementing AML procedures for international business" in the article "6 reasons not to delay the implementation of AML procedures in business"

How to integrate AML and KYC for maximum protection

Synergy of AML and KYC: the foundation of effective financial operation control and risk minimization. Integrating digital client identification, sanction screening, and automated KYC procedures not only speeds up onboarding but also improves the quality of due diligence.

In one of COREDO’s projects for a payment system in Estonia, integrating AML and KYC reduced the time for checking new clients from 5 to 1 day, decreasing false positives by 40%.

How to automate AML processes and reduce costs

Modern technologies (AI, machine learning, cloud platforms) allow for automation of key stages of AML compliance – from transaction monitoring to suspicious activity reporting. Implementing AML compliance outsourcing is especially effective for small and medium-sized businesses, allowing them to focus on growth rather than routine checks.

I recommend attention to your jurisdiction, certifications, and integration with internal IT systems when choosing an AML compliance provider. Solutions implemented by the COREDO team for international companies have shown: well-executed compliance automation reduces costs by 25–35% without compromising control quality.

How to prepare for an AML audit in different jurisdictions

The specifics of preparing for an AML audit depend on the requirements of regulators in the EU, Asia, and Africa. Key steps:

  • Conduct an internal compliance audit and update the company’s AML policy.
  • Ensure employee training on new requirements.
  • Prepare documentation for due diligence, beneficial owner identification, transaction monitoring.
  • Check compliance with internal compliance policies and FATF requirements.

The COREDO team supports clients at all stages of audit preparation, helping to minimize risks and successfully pass the inspection in any jurisdiction.

Common mistakes when implementing AML and how to avoid them

Illustration for the section "Common mistakes when implementing AML and how to avoid them" in the article "6 reasons not to delay the implementation of AML procedures in business"
From COREDO’s practice, I highlight the main mistakes that hinder effective AML implementation:

  • Formal approach: Lack of real control, formal policies without practical implementation.
  • Insufficient automation: Manual checks, lack of integration with IT systems.
  • Ignoring a risk-based approach: Universal procedures instead of adaptation to business and jurisdiction specifics.
  • Insufficient employee training: Lack of regular knowledge updates on new requirements.
  • Mistakes in AML integration for fintech and cryptocurrencies: Underestimating transaction specifics, lack of specialized tools.
To minimize these risks, I recommend:

  • Implementing compliance automation considering the scale and specifics of the business.
  • Regularly conducting internal audits and updating the AML policy.
  • Ensuring staff training and certification.
  • Using a risk-based approach in procedure development.

Key takeaways and practical recommendations

Reason for implementing AML Risks of delaying Practical steps
Reducing money laundering risks Criminal/administrative liability, account blockage Implementing risk-based approach, regular audit
Avoiding fines Regulatory sanctions, losses Compliance automation, staff training
Protecting reputation Loss of investor and client trust Integrating AML and KYC, transparency
Compliance with new requirements Inability to enter new markets Monitoring legislative changes, policy adaptation

Actionable advice:

  • Assess the maturity of your AML procedures and identify priority areas for automation.
  • Invest in staff training and regular updates of internal compliance policies.
  • Integrate AML and KYC for comprehensive business protection and faster client processes.
  • Use modern technologies for scalability and cost reduction.
  • Engage experienced AML compliance providers for outsourcing complex tasks and audit preparation.

COREDO’s experience proves: implementing effective AML procedures is not only about legal compliance but also about strategic resilience, access to international markets, and partner trust. Don’t postpone, act today.

In 2025, more than 70% of international companies faced delays in opening bank accounts abroad, and one in three encountered transaction blocks due to sanction restrictions and new compliance procedures. This is not just statistics: it is a reality that entrepreneurs, executives, and financial directors in Europe, Asia, and the CIS work with daily. Fragmentation of the world economy, trade protectionism, new international sanctions, and tightened AML and KYC requirements are already dictating the rules of the game for businesses seeking scalability and sustainability.

Why is geopolitics in 2025 becoming a key factor for international business? Because today political decisions and sanction risks directly affect the availability of banking services, licensing opportunities, jurisdiction choice, and even corporate governance structure. In a situation where every new regulatory requirement can lead to account blocks or license denial, strategic planning becomes not a luxury, but a necessity.

Presented here is an analytical guide, where I, as the founder of COREDO, share not only an in-depth analysis of global changes but also practical solutions tested in practice. If you want to understand how to minimize account blocking risks, choose a sustainable jurisdiction, or integrate modern AML technologies, I recommend reading the article to the end. Here you’ll find not theory but practical tools for adapting and growing your business in new geopolitical realities.

Geopolitical fragmentation and its consequences for international business

Illustration for section "Geopolitical fragmentation and its consequences for international business" in the article "The impact of geopolitics on bank accounts and business licensing in 2025"

Fragmentation of the world economy and trade protectionism: new challenges of 2025

Since 2022, the world has been moving towards increasing geoeconomic fragmentation. Universal US tariffs, countermeasures by the EU and Asia, and the rise of trade protectionism are radically changing the structure of global supply chains. In practice, the COREDO team observes that even large European and Asian companies are forced to restructure logistics, seek new channels for international settlements, and diversify banking relationships.
Inflation risks and the reduction of interest rates by global central banks further complicate financial planning. For example, in 2024–2025, the European Central Bank and the Bank of England reduced rates to historical lows to support the economy during trade wars. This led to an increase in international loan costs and an increase in requirements for corporate structure transparency.

Sanction pressure and political risks for business

International sanctions in 2025 have become not only a tool of political pressure but also a factor determining the availability of banking services and licensing. The sanction pressure on banks has led many European and Asian banks to enhance internal compliance procedures, and some have even stopped working with companies from certain jurisdictions.

COREDO practice confirms: the long-term consequences of geopolitical conflicts are not just an increase in due diligence costs but also the need for constant monitoring of political risks for investors. In 2025, even a minor change in shareholder structure or the emergence of a new politically exposed person (PEP) could lead to a revision of service conditions or the blocking of a corporate account.

Bank accounts abroad: new realities and risks of 2025

Illustration for section "Bank accounts abroad: new realities and risks of 2025" in the article "The impact of geopolitics on bank accounts and business licensing in 2025"

Opening bank accounts in Europe, Asia, and Africa: challenges and requirements

In 2025, opening bank accounts in Europe has become a complex task, requiring not only a transparent corporate structure but also a deep understanding of new compliance procedures. For example, in the Czech Republic and Estonia, banks require disclosure of all ultimate beneficiaries, detailed descriptions of the source of funds, and business model.
In Asia, especially in Singapore, there remains flexibility for foreign companies, but the requirements for AML business support and verification of corporate structures have noticeably tightened. In Africa, according to COREDO’s experience, compliance procedures when opening accounts are often less formalized, but banks are increasingly implementing international KYC and AML standards, especially for companies with foreign capital.
Account blocking risks have increased significantly: even minor non-compliance with new requirements can lead to fund freezes. Therefore, the solution developed at COREDO includes a preliminary audit of the corporate structure and preparation of a complete package of documents, considering the specifics of each jurisdiction.

KYC, beneficiary verification, and new compliance procedures

In 2025, the requirements for KYC and beneficiary verification have become a key barrier to opening corporate accounts. Banks in the EU and Asia require not only standard documents but also confirmation of the legality of funds’ origin, detailed biographies of directors and shareholders, and disclosure of information about PEPs.
Our experience at COREDO shows that preparation for due diligence should begin long before applying to the bank. This is especially relevant for companies operating in sectors with increased sanction risks or using complex corporate structures. It’s essential to consider new licensing requirements, which include automatic beneficiary verification through international databases and integration with state registers.

Diversification strategies and alternative international payment tools

In the context of increasing account blocking risks and currency control, an effective strategy is to diversify banking partners and use alternative international payment tools. The COREDO team has implemented projects where clients opened corporate accounts in multiple jurisdictions (for example, Czechia + Singapore + Cyprus), allowing them to minimize the impact of local sanctions and political decisions.
Among alternative international payment tools, the role of central bank digital currencies (CBDC) and new international payment systems not dependent on SWIFT is growing. Such solutions streamline international settlements and reduce costs for currency conversions and compliance.

Business licensing in the EU, Asia, and Africa: new rules and opportunities

Illustration for section "Business licensing in the EU, Asia, and Africa: new rules and opportunities" in the article "The impact of geopolitics on bank accounts and business licensing in 2025"

Licensing businesses and fintech companies under sanctions

In 2025, business licensing in the EU and Asia requires not only compliance with standard regulatory requirements but also consideration of political decisions by the US and EU, which directly affect the availability of licenses for fintech companies and financial intermediaries. For example, new universal US tariffs and cross-border operation restrictions force companies to seek alternative jurisdictions for licensing and business scaling.
The solutions developed at COREDO include comprehensive licensing preparation considering sanction pressure and requirements for corporate structure transparency. In some cases, we assisted clients in obtaining licenses for crypto and payment services in Singapore and Estonia, where regulators maintain flexibility but require strict adherence to AML and KYC.

Company registration in Asia and Africa: optimizing tax burdens and choosing a jurisdiction

Choosing a jurisdiction for business registration in 2025 involves balancing sanction pressure resistance, tax optimization, and beneficiary disclosure requirements. For example, Singapore remains one of the most stable and attractive jurisdictions for international business, thanks to low taxation, flexible corporate structure requirements, and modern compliance procedures.
In Africa, company registration is often accompanied by minimal capital and transparency requirements, but there is rising demand for implementing international AML and KYC standards. COREDO’s practice confirms that optimizing tax burdens is possible only with a thorough analysis of all risks associated with currency control and sanctions.

Comparing jurisdictions for business registration in 2025

Jurisdiction Sanction resistance AML requirements Beneficiary transparency Tax burden Licensing features
EU Medium High High Medium Strict
Asia (Singapore) High Medium Medium Low Flexible
Africa Low Low Low Low Simple procedure

AML business support: new requirements and technologies 2025

Illustration for section "AML business support: new requirements and technologies 2025" in the article "The impact of geopolitics on bank accounts and business licensing in 2025"

New AML requirements and process automation

In 2025, AML business support reaches a new level: regulators require not only formal compliance with procedures but also the integration of modern technologies to automate AML processes. In Asia, especially Singapore, implementing automated transaction monitoring systems and beneficiary checks has become mandatory for all companies applying for financial licenses.
The COREDO team implements solutions that allow integrating AML technologies into client business processes, significantly speeding up due diligence and lowering account blocking risks. The role of the compliance officer becomes strategic: responsible not only for compliance but also for building an effective risk management system.

Transparency of corporate structures and beneficiary disclosure

In 2025, requirements for transparency of corporate structures and beneficiary disclosure have tightened in all key jurisdictions. Banks and regulators demand full disclosure of information about ultimate owners, sources of fund origin, and governance structure.
Our experience shows that a transparent corporate structure is not only a legal requirement but also a reputation risk management tool for banks. A solution implemented by COREDO for a client in the EU allowed not only successful completion of all compliance checks but also to access international settlements without restrictions.

Practical steps and recommendations for businesses under geopolitics 2025

Illustration for section "Practical steps and recommendations for businesses under geopolitics 2025" in the article "The impact of geopolitics on bank accounts and business licensing in 2025"

  • Minimize risks of account blocking and sanction pressure: Diversify banking relationships, regularly update KYC files, and monitor political risks for investors.
  • Prepare for new compliance procedures in the EU: Implement automated AML systems, train personnel, and appoint an experienced compliance officer.
  • Integrate ESG and sustainable development into business strategy: This is not only a trend but also a requirement of many European regulators during licensing and account opening.
  • Evaluate ROI in licensing and banking support: Analyze not just the license cost, but also long-term compliance and corporate structure maintenance costs.
  • Follow the COREDO checklist:
    • Prepare a complete package of documents for due diligence.
    • Choose a jurisdiction considering sanction resistance and transparency requirements.
    • Conduct an audit of the corporate structure and sources of funds.
    • Implement automated AML and KYC procedures.
    • Regularly update internal risk management policies.

Key conclusions and answers to frequent questions

Geopolitics 2025 sets new rules for international business: from opening bank accounts to licensing and cross-border operation support. World economy fragmentation, sanction pressure, and tightened compliance procedures require a strategic approach, risk diversification, and modern technology implementation.
Frequently Asked Questions:

Which jurisdictions are most resilient to sanction pressure? – Singapore, Cyprus, Estonia, and several Asian countries where regulators react flexibly to changes but require strict AML and KYC compliance.
How to reduce the risks of corporate account blocking? – Diversify banking relations, implement automated compliance procedures, maintain transparent corporate structure.
Which technologies are most effective for AML?: Use automated transaction monitoring systems, integration with international databases, and machine learning algorithms to detect suspicious operations.

Prospects for 2026: further tightening of transparency requirements, growing role of central bank digital currencies, and expansion of tools for alternative international payments. COREDO solutions allow not only adapting to these changes but using them as a competitive advantage for business scaling in new markets.

In 2024, according to international regulators, up to 40% of applications for opening a corporate account in a foreign bank are rejected already at the compliance check stage. Even more telling: among the companies that pass the initial screening, about 15% face account blocking within the first year of operation due to non-compliance with AML/KYC requirements.

Why do even experienced entrepreneurs and international holdings often become hostages of bank compliance? How to minimize strategic, reputational, and operational risks when registering a company abroad and supporting business overseas?

Today, compliance check in a foreign bank: is not just a formality but a key filter determining access to financial infrastructure, investments, and international markets. Mistakes at this stage can cost not only time and money but also strategic opportunities.

In this article, I, Nikita Veremeev, founder of COREDO, share practical strategies that the COREDO team has developed over years of working with banks in Europe, Asia, and the CIS. Read to the end: you will learn how to pass a compliance check when opening an account in a foreign bank, avoid common mistakes and build a transparent, sustainable business structure that meets the strictest international AML/CFT standards.

Compliance check in a foreign bank: goals, stages, risks

Illustration for the section "Compliance check in a foreign bank: goals, stages, risks" in the article "How to pass a compliance check when opening an account in a foreign bank"
Compliance check in a foreign bank is a multi-level process aimed at client identification (KYC), analysis of the company’s income sources, and assessment of risks associated with money laundering (AML) and terrorism financing (CFT). Bank compliance: is not only a legal requirement but also a tool for managing the bank’s own reputation, protecting against sanctions and tax risks.

Main stages of client verification by the bank

In practice, compliance check consists of several key stages:

  • Initial KYC check: collection and analysis of corporate documents, passports, address verification, ownership and control structure. Special attention is paid to the transparency of the business structure, including verification of beneficiaries and politically exposed persons (PEP).
  • Due diligence: deep audit of funding sources, analysis of business reputation, check of the company and its partners against international sanctions lists and fraud databases.
  • AML check: assessment of risks related to income legalization, real-time transaction monitoring, analysis of compliance with the bank’s internal policies and international AML/CFT standards.
  • Financial monitoring: regular operation checks, automated risk assessment systems, internal audit.
COREDO’s practice confirms that successfully passing each stage requires not only document preparation but also strategic analysis of the corporate structure, transparency of business processes, and readiness for dialogue with the bank’s compliance officer.

Compliance requirements when opening an account: what is important to know

In different jurisdictions, the set of documents and requirements may vary, but the basic principles are unified:

  • Founding documents: charter, registration certificate, meeting protocols.
  • Beneficiary information: passport data, address confirmation, information on ownership shares.
  • Financial statements: balance sheets, cash flow reports, confirmation of the company’s income sources.
  • Corporate structure: ownership scheme, information about affiliated companies and partners.
  • FATCA and CRS reporting: for companies with international shareholders or operations.
The solution developed by COREDO includes the automation of document collection and verification, which significantly reduces compliance processing times and decreases the likelihood of errors.

Main risks and reasons for account opening refusal

According to the COREDO team’s experience, the main reasons for refusal to open an account and account blockage in a foreign bank include:

  • Non-transparent business structure: complex ownership chains, offshore elements without an explanation of economic rationale.
  • Insufficient verification of beneficiaries: presence of PEP, individuals on sanction lists, persons with dubious reputations.
  • Unconvincing income sources: lack of supporting documents, mismatch between declared income and actual operations.
  • Non-compliance with the bank’s internal regulations: differences in AML/CFT standards, lack of international reporting.
  • Jurisdiction-related risks: increased scrutiny of companies from high compliance-risk countries.

KYC and AML check: how to prepare for successful passing

Illustration for the section "KYC and AML check: how to prepare for successful passing" in the article "How to pass a compliance check when opening an account in a foreign bank"
Compliance check is not only a document review but also a test of the maturity of business processes, transparency of corporate connections, and readiness for international regulation.

Which documents and data are most often requested by banks

From COREDO’s practice, the list of mandatory documents for a compliance check includes:

  • Founding documents: charter, registration certificate, extract from the register.
  • Documents for beneficiaries and directors: passport copies, address confirmation, information on professional experience.
  • Financial statements: audited balance sheets, tax returns, bank statements.
  • Contracts with key counterparties: confirmation of business reality, analysis of income structure.
  • FATCA/CRS reports: for companies with an international shareholder structure.
In recent years, banks have actively been implementing digital identification and electronic documents for KYC, which speeds up the process but requires special attention to the format and legitimacy of the provided data.

How to increase the chances of successful compliance passing

Our experience in COREDO has shown that the likelihood of successful compliance passing significantly increases by observing a number of strategic recommendations:

  • Maximum transparency: clear disclosure of the corporate structure, funding sources, business connections.
  • Preparation for compliance officer questions: pre-prepared answers to typical questions about the account opening purpose, business model, partners.
  • Internal audit: regular verification of business processes adherence to international AML/CFT standards.
  • Use of automated platforms: integration of fintech solutions for document collection, storage, and transmission.
  • Constant business support abroad: professional support at all stages of interaction with the bank.
For example, the COREDO team supported the launch of a fintech startup in Singapore, where thanks to compliance automation and a transparent structure, it was possible to pass the KYC and AML check in less than three days: which is an excellent indicator for a region with high requirements for non-residents.

Compliance features in the EU, Asia, and Africa: a comparative analysis

Compliance check requirements vary significantly depending on the jurisdiction. A deep understanding of these differences allows not only to avoid account opening refusals but also to optimize the corporate structure for international business objectives.

Jurisdiction Main KYC/AML requirements Documents for compliance Features/Risks
EU Strict AML/CFT standards, transparency in structure Statutory documents, income source confirmation, FATCA/CRS reporting PEP check, high level of automation
Asia Variability between countries, focus on beneficiaries KYC questionnaire, address confirmation, corporate structure Special requirements for non-residents, fast checks in fintech banks
Africa Enhanced non-resident control, fraud prevention Statutory documents, KYC, source of funds confirmation High blockage risks, unstable regulatory environment

Compliance procedures in the EU: requirements and nuances

In the EU, banks require maximum transparency of corporate connections, full disclosure of beneficiary and income source information.

The implementation of fintech solutions and digital identification allows for faster KYC and AML checks, but automated risk assessment systems instantly detect inconsistencies or attempts to conceal information.

COREDO’s practice shows that for companies with an international structure, special attention is paid to FATCA and CRS reporting, as well as reputational risk analysis.

Asian banks: KYC and AML approach features

In Asia, particularly in Singapore and Hong Kong, banks set high demands for business structure transparency and fund origin, but processes are often more flexible and faster due to the integration of compliance platforms and automation.

For startups and fintech companies, it is critically important to prepare a KYC questionnaire, disclose all connections with foreign beneficiaries, and use electronic documents.

Solutions implemented by the COREDO team allow minimizing the verification time and ensuring compliance with the bank’s internal policies.

African banks: risks, opportunities, and specifics

Compliance procedures in Africa are characterized by enhanced non-resident control and a focus on fraud prevention.

Banks require confirmation of fund origin, conduct real-time transaction monitoring, and the instability of the regulatory environment increases account blockage risks.

Under such conditions, account opening support for business and regular internal audits become essential strategy elements.

Technology and compliance automation: modern business solutions

Illustration for the section "Technology and compliance automation: modern business solutions" in the article "How to pass a compliance check when opening an account in a foreign bank"
Modern bank compliance is unimaginable without process automation, fintech solution integration, and the use of artificial intelligence for risk assessment and transaction monitoring.

How automated solutions impact account opening speed and ROI

Implementing automated compliance systems allows:

  • To reduce verification times: digital identification and electronic documents speed up KYC and AML checks manifold.
  • To increase due diligence accuracy: automated risk assessment systems minimize the human factor and the possibility of errors.
  • To increase ROI: reduced costs for document collection and verification, acceleration of market entry.
In practice, COREDO’s integration of compliance platforms allowed one client: an international holding with offices in the EU and Asia: to open corporate accounts in three banks within one week, with all verification stages conducted online with minimal management involvement.

Best practices for compliance platform integration

For successful compliance platform integration, the COREDO team recommends:

  • Regular internal audits: verify process compliance with international AML/CFT standards.
  • Staff training: improve employee qualifications on compliance and risk management issues.
  • Real-time transaction monitoring: automated systems for detecting suspicious transactions.
  • Flexible adjustment of the bank’s internal policies: adaptation to business specifics and jurisdiction requirements.

Common mistakes and typical problems when passing compliance

Illustration for the section "Common mistakes and typical problems when passing compliance" in the article "How to pass a compliance check when opening an account in a foreign bank"
Even experienced entrepreneurs face typical mistakes that lead to account opening refusals or blockage of an already active account.

How the reputation of beneficiaries and business structure affects the bank’s decision

Business structure analysis for the bank and beneficiary verification are key factors in decision-making.

The presence of PEP or individuals with a negative reputation, non-transparent corporate connections, offshore elements without economic justification – all this increases reputational risk and the likelihood of refusal.

COREDO’s practice confirms that transparency of the corporate structure and proactive disclosure of beneficiary information significantly enhances the chances of successful compliance passing.

What to do if the bank refuses after compliance

Service refusal without explaining reasons: a common practice, especially in banks of the EU and Asia. In this case, it is important to:

  • Conduct an internal audit: identify and eliminate refusal reasons, analyze business structure and documents.
  • Seek legal support: The COREDO team often helps clients prepare an appeal or select an alternative bank with a more flexible compliance policy.
  • Revise internal policies: adapt business processes to the requirements of the chosen jurisdiction.

Key conclusions and practical recommendations for successful compliance check passing

Illustration for the section "Key conclusions and practical recommendations for successful compliance check passing" in the article "How to pass a compliance check when opening an account in a foreign bank"
A compliance check in a foreign bank is a strategic stage that determines not only the opening of an account in a foreign bank but also the long-term stability of international business. Based on COREDO’s experience, I recommend:

  • Prepare documents and disclose business structure in advance: This minimizes refusal risks and speeds up the verification process.
  • Invest in compliance automation and staff training: modern fintech solutions allow integrating KYC/AML processes into daily operations.
  • Regularly conduct internal audits and transaction monitoring: This is not only a bank requirement but an effective risk management tool.
  • Select banks and jurisdictions considering business specifics and readiness for international regulation: analyze banks’ internal regulations, FATCA/CRS requirements, specifics of working with non-residents.
  • Build partnerships with the bank’s compliance officer: openness, willingness for dialogue, and transparency: the key to long-term cooperation.
COREDO’s implemented projects demonstrate: a strategic approach to compliance, a deep understanding of international AML/CFT standards, and competent business support abroad allow not only successful compliance check passing but also creating a foundation for business scaling in any jurisdiction.

In 2024, over 5,000 credit institutions operate in the European market, but only about 3% of new bank license applications in the EU reach final approval. This statistic is not only surprising but also underscores that banking Licensing in Europe is one of the most complex and competitive processes in international business. Why is such a high percentage of applications rejected? The reason is not only the strict requirements but also strategic errors during document preparation, underestimation of compliance risks, and a lack of understanding of the specifics of interaction with European and national regulators.

Today, entrepreneurs and executives planning to launch a bank or fintech project in the EU face a unique challenge: how to navigate the multi-level oversight system, comply with CRD IV, SSM, AML/CTF, and national standards, and most importantly – prepare a document package that withstands the scrutiny of the ECB and national authorities.

In this article, I unveil a practical algorithm for document preparation to obtain a banking license in Europe, share COREDO’s experience, analyze common mistakes, and provide strategic recommendations that will help not just pass the licensing process but lay the foundation for a scalable and sustainable business. If you want not only to understand how to compile documents but also to learn how to avoid rejection and build trust with the regulator – I recommend reading to the end.

Key Requirements for a Banking License in the EU

Illustration to the "Key Requirements for a Banking License in the EU" section in the article "How to Prepare Documents to Obtain a Banking License in Europe"

The Role of the ECB, SSM, and National Regulators

The European banking system operates a unique supervisory mechanism, the SSM (Single Supervisory Mechanism), which combines the powers of the European Central Bank (ECB) and national competent authorities (NCA). For most applicants, the ECB sets the standards for banking licensing in the EU, including capital requirements, ownership structure, corporate governance, and compliance. National regulators (for example, BaFin in Germany, Bank of Lithuania in Lithuania) are responsible for the preliminary analysis of documents, due diligence, and local-level interaction with the applicant.

COREDO’s practice shows: licensing success depends on how well interaction with both levels of supervision is built. For significant banks (SI), the ECB plays a key role, while for less significant ones (LSI): the national authority, however, SSM and CRD IV standards are mandatory for all.

Main Regulatory Acts: CRD IV, RTS, and National Standards

EU banking licensing is regulated by the CRD IV (Capital Requirements Directive), which sets minimum requirements for capital, corporate governance, information disclosure, and internal control. Regulatory technical standards (RTS) detail the requirements for the format and content of documents, AML/CTF procedures, and the business and operational plan structure.

The COREDO team has implemented projects in the Czech Republic, Estonia, Cyprus, and the UK, where national legislation may complement or tighten CRD IV requirements. For example, in Germany, special attention is paid to due diligence of owners, while in Lithuania, to the transparency of the capital structure and IT infrastructure.

Step-by-Step Document Preparation for Obtaining a Banking License

Illustration to the "Step-by-Step Document Preparation for Obtaining a Banking License" section in the article "How to Prepare Documents to Obtain a Banking License in Europe"

Composition and Structure of the Mandatory Document Package

A key stage: forming a complete and structured document package for submission to the ECB and NCA. The standard list includes:

  • Business Plan: a detailed development strategy, financial forecasts, market analysis, unique value proposition.
  • Operational Plan: description of business processes, organizational structure, IT architecture, internal control system.
  • Financial Statements in IFRS: for shareholders and investors, confirmation of financial stability.
  • Internal Policies and Procedures: compliance, AML/CTF, risk management, corporate governance.
  • Documents on Ownership Structure: disclosure of all beneficiaries, confirmation of capital sources.
  • Top Management Qualification: CV, proof of experience, fit & proper assessment.
  • Due Diligence Documents: KYC, proof of fund legality, certificates of no criminal record.
Our experience at COREDO showed: missing at least one of these documents or non-compliance with the RTS format leads to requests for revision and increases the application review time by 2-3 times.

Business Plan and Operational Plan: Requirements and Mistakes

The business plan for a banking license in Europe is not just a formality but a key tool for the regulator to assess the viability and sustainability of the future bank. The ECB requires:

  • A clearly defined business model, description of target segments, and competitive advantages.
  • Financial forecasts for 3-5 years, including stress scenarios.
  • ROI assessment, scaling strategy, risk analysis, and measures to minimize them.
The operational plan should reveal details of IT infrastructure, KYC, AML/CTF processes, internal audit, and liquidity management. The solution developed by COREDO for one of the projects in Estonia allowed the integration of an automated transaction monitoring system, which increased the regulator’s trust and accelerated the application approval.
Common mistakes encountered by the COREDO team when auditing client applications:

  • Insufficient detailing of the business model and operational processes.
  • Absence of stress-testing scenarios.
  • Weak justification of income sources and expenses.
  • Non-compliance of the business plan structure with RTS requirements.

Confirmation of Capital Sources and Transparency of Ownership Structure

Requirements for the transparency of the ownership structure and confirmation of capital sources are among the most sensitive aspects of EU banking licensing. Regulators require:

  • Full disclosure of all ultimate beneficial owners (UBO).
  • Documents verifying the source of funds: bank statements, tax returns, sales contracts.
  • Reputation risk assessment of each shareholder.
In one of COREDO’s cases for a bank in Lithuania, special attention was paid to the transparency of the corporate structure and capital verification through international auditors, which helped avoid additional ECB requests.

Qualification and Experience of Top Management

Fit & proper assessment is a mandatory procedure for all board members and top management. Regulators evaluate:

  • Professional experience (at least 5 years in the banking or financial sector).
  • Reputation, absence of convictions, and conflicts of interest.
  • Competencies in corporate governance, compliance, internal audit.
COREDO regularly assists clients in preparing CVs, recommendations, and supporting documents, as well as organizing preliminary interviews with the regulator to minimize refusal risks.

Compliance Documentation and AML/CTF

Comprehensive compliance documentation for a bank should include:

  • Policy for preventing money laundering and terrorism financing (AML/CTF).
  • Description of KYC procedures and customer due diligence.
  • AML risk assessment – risk evaluation for each product and customer segment.
  • Internal control procedures, the role of the compliance officer, AML systems integration.
COREDO’s practice confirms: quality AML/CTF documentation is one of the main success factors in licensing, especially for banks with international capital structures.

Due Diligence of Owners and Beneficiaries

Due diligence of owners and ultimate beneficiaries includes:

  • Verification of the legality of fund origins.
  • Assessment of business reputation and asset ownership history.
  • Analysis of ties with politically significant persons (PEP), sanction lists.
In one of COREDO’s projects in the Czech Republic, the team organized an independent audit of the ownership structure, which helped expedite the application review and increase the level of trust from the NCA.

Internal Policies, Procedures, and IT Infrastructure

Internal policies and procedures should cover:

  • Management of operational, credit, market, and reputation risks.
  • Internal audit, regular inspections, bank stress testing.
  • IT infrastructure requirements: data protection, cybersecurity, system backup.
COREDO develops tailored regulations considering jurisdiction specifics and ECB requirements, which is especially important for banks with digital business models and remote customer service.

Regulatory Requirements for Charter Capital and Financial Stability

Jurisdiction Minimum Charter Capital Licensing Features
Lithuania 1 million € (special bank), 5 million € Fast licensing, SSM
Germany 5 million € Strict due diligence, ECB
Cyprus 5 million € Popular for EMI/PI
The minimum charter capital for a banking license in Europe ranges from 1 to 5 million euros depending on the jurisdiction and type of license (universal bank, EMI, PI). Financial statements in IFRS, confirmation of stability, and stress testing are mandatory document package elements.
The COREDO team recommends forming capital reserves considering not only the minimum requirements but also the planned scale of operations, which reduces rejection risks and facilitates subsequent business scaling.

Interaction with Supervisory Bodies and the Application Review Process

Illustration to the "Interaction with Supervisory Bodies and the Application Review Process" section in the article "How to Prepare Documents to Obtain a Banking License in Europe"

Submitting Documents to the ECB and National Authorities (NCA)

The process of licensing banks in Europe begins with submitting a complete document package to the national competent authority (NCA), which conducts a preliminary analysis and forwards the application to the ECB. It is important to:

  • Follow the formats and RTS requirements.
  • Prepare documents in English (or the jurisdiction language).
  • Ensure transparency of the corporate structure and capital sources.
COREDO assists clients at all stages of communication with regulators, including preparing responses to requests and organizing meetings with ECB and NCA representatives.

Common Reasons for Rejection and License Revocation

Among the most frequent reasons for rejection or revocation of a banking license in the EU:

  • Insufficient detailing of the business and operational plans.
  • Non-compliance of compliance documentation with ECB and national standards.
  • Lack of transparency in ownership structure or capital sources.
  • Insufficient qualification of top management.
  • AML/CTF procedure violations.
COREDO’s practice shows: thorough preliminary preparation and independent document audit can reduce rejection risk by 60–70%.

Features of SI and LSI Bank Licensing

Illustration to the "Features of SI and LSI Bank Licensing" section in the article "How to Prepare Documents to Obtain a Banking License in Europe"

Under the SSM, banks are divided into significant (SI) and less significant (LSI) institutions. For SI, licensing and oversight are carried out directly by the ECB, while for LSI – by the national authority under SSM control. Differences concern the depth of due diligence, capital requirements, frequency of supervisory checks, and the volume of disclosed information.

COREDO develops individual licensing strategies considering the bank’s status, which allows optimizing time and resources for document preparation.

Practical Steps and Recommendations for Successful Banking License Acquisition

Illustration to the "Practical Steps and Recommendations for Successful Banking License Acquisition" section in the article "How to Prepare Documents to Obtain a Banking License in Europe"

  • Conduct an independent audit of the business model and capital structure before applying.
  • Invest in developing comprehensive compliance documentation, integrating AML systems, and staff training.
  • Ensure transparency of all corporate connections and funding sources.
  • Prepare an operational plan considering IT infrastructure requirements, internal control, and stress testing.
  • Organize preliminary consultations with NCA and ECB to clarify the specific requirements of the chosen jurisdiction.
  • Utilize the experience of external consultants with successful licensing practice in the EU – this minimizes rejection risks and accelerates the application review process.

Key Conclusions and Actionable Advice for Entrepreneurs

Obtaining a banking license in Europe: this is not only a matter of document preparation but also a strategic project requiring a deep understanding of regulatory requirements, business transparency, and readiness for long-term interaction with supervisory bodies. COREDO’s experience confirms: success is achieved where entrepreneurs invest in the quality of the business plan, ownership structure transparency, team qualification, and strategic compliance.

I recommend:

  • Start licensing preparation with an internal audit and independent business model assessment.
  • Form a team with experience in international banks and knowledge of SSM, CRD IV, AML/CTF requirements.
  • Implement modern IT solutions for risk management, compliance, and financial monitoring.
  • Consider licensing as part of long-term strategic planning and scaling business in the EU.
The COREDO team is ready to be your partner at every stage – from jurisdiction selection to successful license acquisition and building a sustainable bank that meets the highest European standards.

Almost 60% of new fintech companies in Asia experience delays or rejections in licensing due to non-compliance with updated AML and KYC requirements, and the total amount of fines imposed on payment organizations in Singapore and Hong Kong for 2024 exceeded $250 million. These figures are not just statistics but a real challenge for any business aiming to scale in Asian markets. Why do even experienced international players waste time and money during the licensing phase? What will change in 2025, and how can a company prepare for new standards to not only remain competitive but also strengthen its market position?

In this article, I, Nikita Veremeev, founder of COREDO, share practical strategies and a fresh perspective on financial licensing regulation in Singapore and Hong Kong. Here you will find not only an analysis of the key changes but also answers to questions that truly concern fintech company executives. If your goal is to take your business to the next level in Asia, read on to the end: you will obtain tools that will help avoid critical mistakes and use the new rules to your advantage.

Financial Licensing Regulation in Singapore: Key Changes and Trends

Illustration for the section "Financial Licensing Regulation in Singapore: Key Changes and Trends" in the article "Changes in Financial Licensing Regulation in Singapore and Hong Kong"

New Payment Services Act Requirements and MAS Roles in 2025

Singapore continues to strengthen the regulation of financial licenses, focusing on transparency, sustainability, and consumer protection. The Payment Services Act (PSA) remains the primary piece of legislation governing the licensing of financial services, including payment systems, e-money, and cryptocurrency services. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) in 2025 is introducing new AML/CFT requirements, strengthening KYC standards, and implementing additional audit procedures for all license holders.

The changes affect not only local but also international companies working with foreign clients. For instance, now, to renew a Major Payment Institution (MPI) or Standard Payment Institution (SPI) license, it is necessary to undergo an annual compliance audit, provide extended suspicious activity reports, and update internal AML policies in line with the latest MAS recommendations. The implementation of new KYC standards requires modernization of the compliance infrastructure, integration of automated monitoring systems, and regular employee training.
COREDO’s practice has shown that companies that have invested in automating due diligence and implementing digital risk management tools in advance undergo the MAS audit without delays and minimize license renewal costs.

Types of Financial Licenses in Singapore: SPI, MPI, Money-Changing, DTSP

In 2025, the structure of financial service licensing in Singapore became even more differentiated. The main types of licenses:

  • Standard Payment Institution (SPI): Suitable for startups and small fintech companies with a limited transaction volume (up to 3 million SGD per month). Capital and corporate governance requirements are lower, but transaction limits restrict scaling opportunities.
  • Major Payment Institution (MPI): For mid-sized and large players operating without payment volume limits. Requires stricter AML/KYC controls, regular audits, and a robust IT infrastructure.
  • Money-Changing License: Required for companies conducting currency exchange. In addition to standard requirements, proof of sound procedures for preventing money laundering is required.
  • Digital Token Service Provider (DTSP): A new category introduced to regulate digital token and cryptocurrency operations. In 2025, DTSP requirements include mandatory integration with international payment systems and enhanced due diligence procedures for clients.
The solution developed at COREDO for a client, an international group entering the Singapore market with a digital wallet service, included comprehensive business plan preparation, building a corporate structure under MPI, and implementing an automatic transaction monitoring system to comply with new MAS standards.

Licensing Features for Foreign Companies and International Fintech Groups

Registering a company for a financial license in Singapore requires well-thought-out strategic planning. For foreign companies, compliance with MAS for overseas clients becomes a key factor: it is necessary not only to meet local AML/CFT standards but also to integrate the corporate structure considering international investor and client protection requirements.

The COREDO team has implemented projects for European and Asian fintech groups, where optimizing the corporate structure and preparing a business plan for licensing significantly accelerated the licensing process. It is important to consider that MAS pays special attention to the transparency of capital sources, management qualification, and the presence of sustainable risk management procedures.
For international fintech operations in Asia, it is critical to address cross-border payments, integration with international payment systems, and personal data protection for clients in advance.

New Fines and Penalties for Non-compliance with Regulatory Requirements

From 2025, MAS tightens penalties for non-compliance with regulatory requirements. The amount of fines for violating new AML/CFT standards and suspicious activity reporting has doubled. Special attention is given to risk management in financial services: the absence of effective internal control procedures can lead not only to financial sanctions but also to license revocation.

COREDO’s practice confirms: the implementation of automated tools for operations monitoring and regular updating of internal policies significantly reduces regulatory risks and avoids costly inspections.

Financial Licensing Regulation in Hong Kong: Latest Updates and Prospects

Illustration for the section "Financial Licensing Regulation in Hong Kong: Latest Updates and Prospects" in the article "Changes in Financial Licensing Regulation in Singapore and Hong Kong"

Main Types of Financial Licenses: SFC, SVF, MSO

Hong Kong maintains its status as one of Asia’s leading financial centers due to its flexible yet strict licensing system. The following main licenses are available for fintech companies:

  • SFC License: Regulates brokerage, management, and advisory activities with financial instruments. Requires stringent corporate governance, AML policy implementation, and regular audits.
  • SVF (Stored Value Facility) License: Required for e-money issuers and digital wallets. In 2025, the requirements for IT infrastructure, client protection, and operating limits management have been significantly strengthened.
  • MSO (Money Service Operator) License: For companies making money transfers and currency exchanges. Includes mandatory due diligence procedures, KYC, and regular reporting to the regulator.
COREDO’s experience shows that for successful licensing in Hong Kong, it is important to prepare a comprehensive compliance infrastructure in advance, integrate risk management procedures, and ensure transparency of the corporate structure.

New AML/CFT and KYC Requirements for Financial Companies

In 2025, Hong Kong introduces updated AML/CFT standards synchronized with international FATF recommendations. New KYC procedures, extended compliance audits, and the implementation of automated systems for monitoring suspicious operations are mandatory for all license holders.

Special attention is paid to IT infrastructure requirements for AML/KYC: companies must ensure the storage and analysis of large data volumes and integrate with national and international databases on suspicious clients.
The implementation of such solutions by the COREDO team for clients in the digital assets sector not only enabled them to pass the SFC audit without remarks but also increased trust from banks and investors.

Licensing for Cryptocurrency and Web3 Projects: What’s Changed

In 2025, Hong Kong strengthens the regulation of cryptocurrency exchanges and Web3 projects. To obtain a license for storing digital assets and conducting operations with digital tokens, proving funding sources and implementing multi-layered systems for client and investor protection is now required.

Licensing digital wallets and crypto exchanges involve mandatory IT infrastructure audits, regular suspicious activity reporting, and mandatory integration with international payment systems.
Solutions implemented by COREDO for clients in the Web3 sector included the development of a flexible compliance infrastructure that simultaneously meets the requirements of SFC and MAS, as well as the automation of due diligence processes to accelerate the onboarding of new clients.

Comparison of Hong Kong and Singapore Requirements for Fintech Companies

Type of License Jurisdiction Main Requirements Limits/Restrictions Suitable For
SPI (Standard Payment Institution) Singapore Capital, KYC, AML, MAS Up to $3 million/month Startups, small fintech companies
MPI (Major Payment Institution) Singapore Stricter Requirements No limits Medium and large fintech companies
Money-Changing License Singapore Currency exchange procedures Currency exchange only Exchangers, travel market
SFC License Hong Kong SFC, AML, Corporate Governance By service types Brokers, asset managers
SVF License Hong Kong AML, IT infrastructure By stored value E-money issuers, wallets
MSO License Hong Kong AML, KYC, due diligence By transaction volume Money transfers, currency exchange
COREDO’s practice shows: the choice of jurisdiction and type of license should be based not only on current business needs but also on strategic scaling plans, requirements for integration with international payment systems, and tax incentives for fintech companies.

AML Compliance in Asia: New Standards and Business Challenges

Illustration for the section "AML Compliance in Asia: New Standards and Business Challenges" in the article "Changes in Financial Licensing Regulation in Singapore and Hong Kong"

How AML/CFT Requirements Have Changed in Singapore and Hong Kong

In 2025, new AML/CFT requirements in Singapore and Hong Kong emphasize proactive risk management and the adoption of technologies for automating KYC and transaction monitoring. Companies are obliged to regularly update internal policies, conduct compliance audits, and provide extensive suspicious activity reports.

Corporate governance receives special attention: executives and key individuals must be suitability screened, while the corporate structure must be fully transparent to regulators.

Practical Steps for Implementing a Compliance Infrastructure

In practice, implementing an effective compliance infrastructure requires:

  • Developing and regularly updating AML policies in line with the latest MAS and SFC recommendations.
  • Implementing automated due diligence and client monitoring systems.
  • Integrating IT infrastructure for storing, analyzing, and transmitting data on suspicious operations.
  • Conducting regular training sessions for employees and management.
The COREDO team has carried out numerous compliance process automation projects, enabling clients to reduce operating costs and increase the speed of audit and reporting for financial licenses.

Fines and Risks for Business Non-compliance with New Standards

Non-compliance with the new AML/CFT standards results in not only large fines but also strategic business risks: from account blocking to license revocation and loss of trust from partners and investors. To minimize risks, COREDO recommends implementing comprehensive risk management, conducting regular compliance audits, and using modern compliance automation tools.

Practical Recommendations for Entrepreneurs and Fintech Company Executives

Illustration for the section "Practical Recommendations for Entrepreneurs and Fintech Company Executives" in the article "Changes in Financial Licensing Regulation in Singapore and Hong Kong"

How to Choose the Optimal License Type for Your Business

The choice of license depends on the scale of the business, the intended markets, and the specifics of the services. For example:

  • SPI: For startups and small companies with limited turnover.
  • MPI: For mid-sized and large players focused on scaling.
  • Money-Changing License: For companies specializing in currency exchange.
  • SVF/MSO: For projects in Hong Kong related to e-money, wallets, and money transfers.
COREDO’s experience shows that choosing the right license at the strategic planning stage helps avoid future restrictions and optimize tax burdens.

Preparation for Licensing: Documents, Business Plan, Corporate Structure

Key steps:

  • Preparing a detailed business plan for licensing that takes into account MAS/SFC requirements.
  • Building a transparent corporate structure in line with international standards.
  • Conducting due diligence and collecting a full set of documents for registering a company for a financial license.
  • Ensuring MAS compliance for overseas clients, including the implementation of KYC/AML procedures.
The COREDO team guides clients at all stages, helping to minimize timelines and increase the chances of successfully obtaining a license.

Scaling the Business and Entering New Markets in Asia

Strategic planning for market entry in Asia requires integration with international payment systems, operating limit management, and understanding regulatory specifics in each jurisdiction. For international fintech operations, it is important to address client and investor protection and tax optimization in advance.

How to Prepare for Audit and Regular Reporting

For successful audit and reporting to MAS and SFC, it is necessary to:

  • Implement modern technologies for automating operation monitoring.
  • Regularly update internal AML/CFT policies.
  • Prepare extensive suspicious activity reports and engage with regulators in real-time.
Solutions implemented by COREDO enable clients not only to meet new requirements but also to build long-term partnerships with banks and investors.

Key Takeaways and Actionable Recommendations for Business

Illustration for the section "Key Takeaways and Actionable Recommendations for Business" in the article "Changes in Financial Licensing Regulation in Singapore and Hong Kong"

  • Key Changes: In 2025, financial licensing regulation in Singapore and Hong Kong becomes stricter, particularly concerning AML/CFT and KYC.
  • Impact on Business: Tightening requirements demand investments in compliance infrastructure, automation, and staff training.
  • Practical Steps: Choosing the optimal license, preparing a business plan, building a transparent corporate structure, and implementing modern IT solutions for AML/KYC.
  • Risk Minimization: Regular audits, automation of compliance processes, and active interaction with regulators.
  • Market Prospects: Companies adapting to new standards gain competitive advantages and access to international markets.

FAQ: Frequently Asked Questions About Financial Licensing Regulation in Singapore and Hong Kong

How to obtain a financial license in Singapore for foreign companies?

You need to register the company with a local director, prepare a business plan, undergo due diligence, and submit an application to MAS. It is important to pre-plan the corporate structure and AML/CFT compliance.

What are the changes in cryptocurrency license regulation in Singapore in 2025?

New requirements for DTSP have been introduced, KYC standards have been strengthened, reporting has been extended, and additional audit procedures have been implemented for digital token operations.

What documents are needed for a currency exchange license in Singapore?

Founding documents, a business plan, proof of capital sources, AML/KYC procedures, and management information are required.

How to comply with AML/CFT when registering a payment company in Asia?

Implement automated KYC systems, develop internal AML policies, regularly update due diligence procedures, and train staff.

How to choose between SPI and MPI licenses for business scaling?

SPI is suitable for startups with limited turnover, while MPI is for companies planning to scale and operate without transaction limits.

What are the IT infrastructure requirements for AML in Singapore?

It is necessary to ensure the storage and analysis of large data volumes, integration with international databases, and automation of operation monitoring.

How to obtain a license for storing digital assets in Hong Kong?

A business plan must be prepared, a multi-level client protection system must be implemented, and IT infrastructure audits must be passed, meeting SFC requirements.

What are the prospects for digital token regulation in Asia after 2025?

Further tightening of AML/CFT standards is expected, along with integration with international monitoring systems and the development of requirements for investor and client protection.

If you plan to scale your business in Asia or enter the market with an innovative fintech product, the COREDO team is ready to be your reliable partner at every stage: from strategic planning to successful audit completion and building an effective compliance infrastructure.

In 2025, the number of legal entities whose assets were frozen due to EU sanctions lists increased by 38% compared to the previous year. More than 22 banks have been completely cut off from international settlements, and the dynamic oil pricing mechanism has become mandatory for all traders working with exports to Europe. For companies from Europe, Asia, and the CIS, this is not just statistics, but a daily reality where every decision is associated with the risk of account blockage, supply chain disruption, or even criminal liability for circumventing sanctions.

EU sanctions are becoming increasingly complex: the 18th package of restrictions leaves no room for error, and the new requirements for compliance procedures and legal support for transactions demand not only a deep understanding of international sanctions law but also flexibility in corporate structuring. How to set up business processes to avoid ending up on the blacklist? Which counterparty monitoring and verification tools really work? How to minimize corporate risks and protect assets under sanctions pressure?

I am convinced: understanding the new rules is not just a matter of survival, but a strategic advantage. In this article, I share the experience of COREDO so that you can not only adapt but also use sanctions compliance as a growth tool. Read to the end: you will receive not only a current analysis of the 18th EU sanctions package but also practical recommendations to help your business maintain resilience and competitiveness.

Brief Overview of the 18th European Union Sanctions Package

Illustration for the section "Brief Overview of the 18th European Union Sanctions Package" in the article "European Union Adopts the 18th Sanctions Package"

Main Goals and Principles of the New Restrictions

The 18th EU sanctions package: it’s not just another expansion of restrictive measures against Russia. Its key aim is to strengthen control over the circumvention of sanctions, increase transparency of international settlements, and minimize risks to the European financial system. The focus is on individual EU sanctions against individuals and legal entities, strengthening sanctions monitoring, and the introduction of new sanction risk management mechanisms.
COREDO’s practice confirms: the new restrictions require businesses not only to formally comply with EU sanctions lists but also to implement comprehensive due diligence procedures, regularly update KYC processes, and automate sanctions monitoring. In conditions where secondary sanctions pose a real threat to companies from the CIS and Asia, sanctions risk management becomes a top priority.

Who Are Affected by the New Sanctions: Sectors and Jurisdictions

The 18th EU sanctions package significantly expanded the geographical and sectoral coverage of the restrictions:
  • Banking Sector: a ban on operations with 22 banks, including SWIFT blockage and account freezes, effectively excludes them from the international financial system.
  • Energy and Oil Trading: new sanctions against the oil sector, export restrictions on oil, automatic price cap adjustments, and the introduction of a dynamic pricing mechanism.
  • Shipping and Logistics: EU blacklist of ships, sanctions against captains and shadow fleet management companies, restrictions for international flag registries.
  • Crypto Sector: sanctions against the crypto sector, tightening of cryptocurrency regulation in the EU, new AML and KYC requirements for fintech companies.
  • Individual Sanctions: the list of individuals and companies involved in circumventing sanctions has been expanded, including against the Russian Direct Investment Fund and Indian refineries working with Russian oil.
A solution developed at COREDO for clients showed: effective corporate structuring in the EU and jurisdiction diversification are key to reducing operational and sanctions risks.

Key Innovations of the 18th EU Sanctions Package

Illustration for the section "Key Innovations of the 18th EU Sanctions Package" in the article "European Union Adopts the 18th Sanctions Package"

Ban on Operations with Russian Banks and Financial Institutions

Sanctions against banks are one of the most sensitive elements of the new package. The ban on operations with 22 banks, SWIFT blockage, and account freezes mean that any company conducting settlements through these institutions risks facing a complete block on international payments. The COREDO team has implemented projects to relocate settlement centers to alternative EU and Asian jurisdictions, allowing clients to maintain access to cross-border payments and minimize the risk of account blockage.
Special attention is paid to sanctions due diligence: regular checks of banking partners against EU sanctions lists and the implementation of automated platforms for real-time monitoring of changes.

Restrictions for the Energy Sector and Oil Trading

For the energy sector, the 18th EU sanctions package is a challenge: new export restrictions on oil, sanctions against traders and shadow fleet management companies have been introduced. The dynamic oil pricing mechanism and automatic price cap adjustments compel reviewing all contracts and implementing automated financial monitoring systems.
COREDO’s experience showed: updating contract terms, integrating sanctions monitoring into ERP systems, and conducting regular sanctions audits of supply chains allows reducing the risk of secondary sanctions and ensuring transparency for European regulators.

Sanctions against Shipping and Logistics

The EU blacklist of ships, sanctions against captains, and restrictions for international flag registries severely complicate supply chain management under sanctions. For companies working with exports and imports, this means the necessity to review logistical routes, implement monitoring tools for shipping companies, and conduct sanctions due diligence for each supply chain link.
COREDO’s practice confirms: only a comprehensive sanctions audit of logistics and the use of alternative routes allow avoiding supply disruptions and maintaining business resilience.

New Restrictions for the Crypto Sector

Sanctions against the crypto sector and tighter cryptocurrency regulation in the EU are another strategic challenge for fintech and trading. New KYC/AML requirements, sanctions restrictions on cryptocurrencies, and mandatory transaction monitoring using compliance platforms have been introduced. For COREDO clients, implementing automated solutions for sanction monitoring of crypto counterparties has become standard, allowing for reduced risk of account blockage and secondary sanctions.

Practical Consequences for Business: Risks and Challenges

Illustration for the section "Practical Consequences for Business: Risks and Challenges" in the article "European Union Adopts the 18th Sanctions Package"

How the 18th EU Sanctions Package Affects Business in Europe, Asia, and the CIS

The introduction of new EU sanctions in 2025 transforms not only the structure of international settlements but also the export and import strategy for companies from Europe, Asia, and the CIS. The cost and availability of international settlements are decreasing, and sanctions barriers for M&A deals and corporate restructuring become a serious obstacle to business scaling.
COREDO’s experience showed: for companies from the CIS and Asia, the key is not only to comply with formal requirements but also to implement regular corporate sanctions reporting, which reduces the risk of account blockage and increases trust from European banks.

Risks of Secondary Sanctions and Liability for Circumvention

Secondary sanctions pose a real threat to international holdings and subsidiaries working with Russian assets or contractors. Violating the sanctions regime results not only in asset blockage for legal entities but also in criminal liability for bypassing sanctions.
The COREDO team recommends implementing sanctions risk management at the holding structure level: conducting regular sanctions audits, monitoring changes in international sanctions regimes, and documenting all compliance procedures to demonstrate good faith to EU regulators.

Impact on Investment Climate and Corporate Deals

Sanction barriers for investments, stricter corporate governance, and new sanction reporting requirements significantly affect the ability to scale business in Europe. For foreign investors, this means the necessity for in-depth due diligence, implementing sanctions monitoring systems, and regular corporate risk assessment.
COREDO’s solutions in corporate structuring in the EU and supporting M&A deals allow clients to minimize risks associated with sanctions pressure and maintain flexibility when entering new markets.

Compliance, AML, and due diligence under New EU Sanctions

New Compliance and AML Requirements for European and International Companies

The 18th EU sanctions package tightened compliance procedures, AML, and due diligence requirements for all financial market participants. Now not only standard KYC is mandatory, but also regular checks against EU sanctions lists, automating sanctions monitoring, and the expanded role of the compliance officer.
COREDO’s team implements comprehensive compliance platforms for clients, integrated with international sanctions registries, allowing timely risk identification and prevention of violations. Special attention is paid to training employees on new financial monitoring standards and documenting all procedures for EU regulators.

Counterparty Checks and Working with Sanctions Lists

Checking counterparties for sanctions affiliation becomes an obligatory part of due diligence. In 2025, working with EU sanctions lists requires not only manual verification but also the implementation of automated monitoring tools capable of identifying new risks in real-time.
COREDO’s solutions allow integrating such tools into business processes, reducing the likelihood of errors and speeding up decision-making processes. For companies conducting cross-border operations, this is critically important for maintaining resilience and transparency.

Preparing for Sanctions Audit and Internal Monitoring

Sanctions audit becomes an integral part of corporate governance. Preparing for an audit requires not only up-to-date corporate sanctions reporting but also organizing internal sanctions monitoring that records all actions for sanctions compliance control.
COREDO’s practice showed: regular internal checks, automation of reporting, and training employees allow successfully passing audits by European regulators and minimizing the risk of fines and account blockage.

Practical Steps for Minimizing Risks and Adapting Business

Illustration for the section "Practical Steps for Minimizing Risks and Adapting Business" in the article "European Union Adopts the 18th Sanctions Package"

Recommendations for Protecting Assets and Preventing Freezes

Freezing assets of legal entities and accounts is one of the most serious risks of the new sanctions regime. To prevent them, COREDO recommends:
  • Regularly update the list of banking partners, excluding sanctioned institutions from settlement chains.
  • Implement systems for automated transaction and sanctions list monitoring.
  • Prepare Legal Opinions for each transaction confirming compliance with the sanctions regime.

Strategies for Adapting Corporate Structure and Business Processes

Restructuring corporate structure under new sanctions requires a comprehensive approach:
  • Restructuring business considering export and corporate licensing requirements under sanctions.
  • Optimizing cross-border capital movement considering restrictions on international settlements.
  • Implementing alternative logistics routes and diversifying supply chains.
COREDO’s experience shows: timely adaptation of business processes allows not only reducing risks but also maintaining competitiveness in European and Asian markets.

Best Practices in Legal Support and Compliance

Effective legal support for transactions under sanctions pressure is based on:
  • Conducting sanctions expertise for each transaction.
  • Implementing corporate compliance and AML standards.
  • Using legal consultations on EU sanctions for timely response to legislative changes.
The COREDO team supports clients at all stages – from deal structuring to preparing corporate sanctions reports.

Key Takeaways and Actionable Advice for Business

Change in the 18th Package Risks for Business Recommendations
Ban on operations with 22 banks Account blockage, settlement restriction Verify banking partners, use alternative settlement schemes
Dynamic oil pricing mechanism Increased volatility, new reporting requirements Update contracts, implement automated price monitoring
Shipping restrictions Supply chain disruptions Review logistics, use alternative routes
Sanctions against the crypto sector Risks for fintech and trading Strengthen KYC/AML, implement sanction monitoring of crypto counterparties

Brief Checklist for Executives and Compliance Officers

  • Update the list of banking and logistic partners.
  • Implement automated platforms for sanctions monitoring.
  • Conduct an internal sanctions audit and train employees on new requirements.
  • Ensure transparency and documentation of all compliance procedures.
  • Prepare corporate sanctions reporting for EU regulators.

Useful Tools and Platforms for Sanctions Monitoring

  • International EU sanctions lists registries.
  • Compliance platforms with automatic sanctions list updates.
  • ERP systems with integrated sanctions monitoring.
For an individual strategy to adapt to new EU sanctions, contact COREDO experts. We are ready to offer solutions that will ensure the sustainability and growth of your business under sanctions pressure.

In 2024, Asia became the world’s leader in fintech market growth rates: the investment volume in digital financial services in the region exceeded $150 billion, and the number of new licensed players grew by more than 30% in a year. But behind these impressive numbers lies a different reality; for most international companies striving for expansion, the financial license in Asia becomes a crucial barrier and simultaneously a strategic resource.

Why is this the case?

Without licensing for financial activities, a legal entry into the markets of Singapore, Hong Kong, UAE, or Kazakhstan is impossible: banks refuse services, partners are not ready to cooperate, and regulators quickly block illegal operations. Moreover, the absence of a transparent structure and the status of a licensed company often leads to the loss of investors and the impossibility of scaling.

At COREDO, we encounter questions daily:

“How to choose the optimal jurisdiction for business registration in Asia?”, “What are the real advantages of a financial license in Asia?”, “What requirements do the regulatory bodies of Asia impose?”
These questions are not random: the correct answers determine the investment attractiveness of the jurisdiction, the speed of market entry, and the business’s resilience.

If you’re not just looking for an overview but a practical guide that will help avoid critical mistakes and gain strategic advantage:

I recommend reading the article till the end. Here, I systematize the experience of the COREDO team, revealing five key reasons why a financial license in Asian countries is not just a formality but the foundation of your success.

Financial License in Asia: Opportunities and Competitive Advantages

Illustration for the section "Financial License in Asia: Opportunities and Competitive Advantages" in the article "5 Reasons to Obtain a Financial License in Asian Countries"

How a financial license in Asia opens access to international markets

Obtaining a license for financial companies in Asia is not only about complying with regulatory requirements but also a direct route to international access to financial markets. COREDO’s practice confirms: a payment operator license in Singapore or a banking license in Hong Kong allows integration with global banks, ensuring cross-border payments and working with clients worldwide.
For example, one of our clients, a European fintech startup: after obtaining an electronic payments license in Singapore, entered the Southeast Asian markets and attracted strategic partners from Japan and South Korea. Thanks to the license, the company not only ensured legal transparency but also gained access to innovative payment infrastructure and international settlements.

Development of innovative payment solutions and fintech ecosystem

Asia is the world’s center of the fintech ecosystem. A license for a fintech company in Asia opens access to regulatory sandboxes, where innovative payment solutions can be tested in real conditions with minimal regulatory barriers. The solution developed by COREDO for clients in Singapore and Hong Kong showed that participation in sandboxes accelerates the market launch of new digital financial services and reduces compliance costs.
Implementation of digital financial services, integration with bank APIs, and partner platforms, and working with cryptocurrency become available only with the appropriate license. This is why financial regulation in Asia today is built on supporting innovation and flexibility for new players.

Transparency, Trust, and Legal Protection: The Role of Licensing

Illustration for the section "Transparency, Trust, and Legal Protection: The Role of Licensing" in the article "5 Reasons to Obtain a Financial License in Asian Countries"

License as a tool to increase customer and partner trust

In the highly competitive Asian market, trust is a key asset. A financial license in Asia becomes a transparency guarantee, protecting the interests of customers and partners. COREDO’s experience shows: having a license for investment activities or electronic payments significantly increases the trust level from banks, institutional investors, and corporate clients.

Moreover, a license serves as a tool for analyzing scaling risks: when entering new markets, having a license reduces the likelihood of account blocks and service refusals. Protecting the rights of financial service consumers, implementing internal procedures for managing reputational risks, and internal auditing are mandatory elements of licensing that form business sustainability.

Legal guarantees and protection against regulatory risks

Licensing is not only access to the market but also legal support for business in Asia. Regulatory bodies in Asia (MAS in Singapore, HKMA in Hong Kong, AFSA in Kazakhstan) impose strict requirements for internal control, compliance officer appointment, division of management functions, and reputational risk management.
COREDO’s team executed projects where legal support during the licensing stage allowed clients to avoid fines and blocks related to non-compliance with AML/CTF requirements. Financial oversight in Asia is built on the principles of transparency and protection of all market participants’ interests, and a license is a legal guarantee of stability.

Compliance with International AML and KYC Standards

Illustration for the section "Compliance with International AML and KYC Standards" in the article "5 Reasons to Obtain a Financial License in Asian Countries"

How to ensure compliance with FATF, Basel, IFRS requirements

Modern financial activity licensing in Asia is impossible without the integration of international standards: FATF, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, financial reporting IFRS. Our experience at COREDO showed: successful licensing requires the implementation of internal audit systems, risk management, and regular reporting according to international standards.

The implementation of procedures to counter money laundering and terrorist financing is a mandatory condition for obtaining a license. Regulators require not only formal compliance but real functioning of transaction monitoring systems, customer identification (KYC), and internal control.

Practical aspects of implementing AML/KYC in Asian jurisdictions

AML compliance in Asia is not just a set of documents but a comprehensive risk management system. The solution developed by COREDO for a fintech company in Singapore included transaction monitoring automation, compliance officer appointment, and regular staff training. This approach allowed not only to pass licensing but also to minimize the risks of fines and future license loss.
Particular attention is paid to customer identification (KYC), transaction monitoring, and internal control procedures. Regular internal audits and scaling risk analysis become mandatory elements for all licensed companies.

Regulatory Flexibility and Variety of Licenses in Asian Countries

Illustration for the section "Regulatory Flexibility and Variety of Licenses in Asian Countries" in the article "5 Reasons to Obtain a Financial License in Asian Countries"

Comparison of licensing conditions in key jurisdictions

Jurisdiction License Type Min. Capital Timeframe Regulatory Features
Singapore EMI, payment operator from 100,000 SGD 4-6 months Strict AML, fintech support
Hong Kong MSO, banking from 300,000 HKD 6-9 months Flexible regulation, DLT
Kazakhstan Payment systems from 50,000 USD 4-8 months Development of digital services

Company’s real presence, a legal address in the licensing country, residency requirements for directors, and minimum charter capital are basic parameters to consider when choosing a jurisdiction. In each case, the COREDO team analyzes the investment attractiveness and regulatory specifics.

How to choose the optimal country for financial business licensing

COREDO’s experience shows: the choice of country depends on the business model, target markets, and financial company structure for licensing. For example, Singapore offers the best conditions for fintech startups, Hong Kong for banking and investment projects, Kazakhstan for payment systems and digital services. The long-term benefits of licensing in Asia are regulatory flexibility, innovation support, and potential scalability across the entire region.

Economic Efficiency and ROI of Obtaining a Financial License

Illustration for the section "Economic Efficiency and ROI of Obtaining a Financial License" in the article "5 Reasons to Obtain a Financial License in Asian Countries"

How a license helps optimize taxation and reduce costs

Registering a business in Asia and obtaining a financial license allows optimizing international taxation, reducing costs on cross-border payments, and integration with global banks. For example, Singapore has one of the most transparent and beneficial tax systems for international companies, while Kazakhstan offers special regimes for fintech projects.

The COREDO team has implemented cases where optimizing the group structure through licensing in Asia allowed clients to reduce tax burden by 15–20% and ensure stable access to international settlements.

ROI metrics and assessment of licensing efficiency

The following ROI metrics are used to assess the efficiency of obtaining a financial license in Asia:
  • Reduction in service and compliance costs
  • Increase in the number of international clients and partners
  • Revenue growth through entering new markets
  • Reduction of operational and legal risks
  • Increase in the company’s investment attractiveness

The long-term benefits of licensing are not only cost savings but also increased competitiveness in the Asian market, the possibility of integration with global banks, and sustainable scalability.

Practical Steps for Obtaining a Financial License in Asia

Main stages of the licensing process

The process of obtaining a financial license in Asia involves several key stages:
  1. Preparation of a business plan that meets the regulators’ requirements (service description, company structure, risk analysis, financial forecasts)
  2. Collection and preparation of documents: charter, management information, confirmation of capital sources, internal AML/KYC policies
  3. Reputation check of management and compliance officer
  4. Application submission and interaction with regulatory bodies
  5. Implementation of internal control and risk management systems, organization of internal audit

COREDO’s practice confirms: the success of licensing depends on the quality of document preparation and transparency of the corporate structure.

Errors and difficulties in document preparation

The main errors entrepreneurs face:
  • Insufficient elaboration of the business plan and financial model
  • Non-compliance of internal control with regulatory requirements
  • Document errors, lack of confirmation of the company’s actual presence
  • Insufficient qualification of the compliance officer and management

The COREDO team assists clients in identifying and mitigating these risks at early stages, significantly increasing the chances of successful licensing and reducing document amendment costs.

Key Conclusions and Recommendations

A financial license in Asia is not just a formality but a strategic tool for entering international markets, developing innovative products, and protecting the business from regulatory risks. Here are five key reasons to obtain a license specifically in Asian countries:
  • Access to international markets and integration with global banks
  • The opportunity to test and implement innovative payment solutions
  • Increasing trust from clients, partners, and investors
  • Compliance with international AML/KYC standards and protection against regulatory risks
  • Economic efficiency, tax optimization, and sustainable scaling
I recommend entrepreneurs and executives to proactively analyze the investment attractiveness of the jurisdiction, thoroughly prepare the business plan, and pay special attention to internal control and compliance. Professional legal support and an experienced team are the keys to successful licensing and long-term success in the Asian market.

COREDO remains your reliable partner at every stage: from choosing the country and preparing documents to integrating into Asia’s fintech ecosystem and managing reputational risks.

According to the European Commission, approximately 1.5 trillion euros are laundered annually in the EU—a sum comparable to the GDP of the world’s leading economies. This fact is not just shocking: it highlights how crucial the fight for corporate ownership transparency and AML compliance for businesses is in the face of global competition and stricter regulatory requirements. Today, no international entrepreneur can ignore the trend towards disclosure of beneficiaries in Europe: otherwise, the risks of losing access to banking services, investors, and markets become real.

How will the investment climate, corporate reporting, and due diligence procedures change when the EU implements a unified register of beneficiaries? What strategic opportunities and risks does the new reality open up for international companies?

The practice of COREDO shows: the transition to a single standard of transparency is not just a formality but a fundamental transformation of corporate governance affecting every company operating in the EU and beyond. In this article, I will examine in detail what changes for business, how to prepare for new requirements, and what solutions today allow not only to comply with the law but also to enhance the investment appeal of a company. I recommend reading to the end: you will gain not only a deep understanding of the reform but also concrete tools to protect your business interests.

Goals of Creating a Unified Register of Beneficiaries in Europe

The implementation of the EU unified register of beneficiaries is a response to the challenges of the digitalization and globalization era. The main task: ensure transparency of corporate ownership and create effective barriers to money laundering (AML) and terrorism financing, in line with international FATF standards. The new register makes information about beneficial owners of companies accessible to regulators, banks, and, in certain cases, investors, significantly simplifying due diligence procedures and reducing risks for the financial system.

The COREDO team has implemented projects where the disclosure of beneficiaries became a key condition for opening accounts in European banks and obtaining financial services licenses. Our experience confirms: transparency of the corporate structure is not only a legal requirement but also a competitive advantage for companies focused on long-term development and investment attraction.

Which Companies Must Disclose Beneficiaries in the EU

Disclosure of information about ultimate beneficial owners becomes mandatory for all legal entities registered in EU countries, including limited liability companies, joint-stock companies, partnerships, and foundations. Exceptions are only possible for public companies whose shares are traded on regulated markets, as their structure is already transparent to regulators and investors.

The legal entity register in the EU is now integrated with the platform for beneficiary registration, providing a unified standard for identifying the ultimate beneficiary. The solution developed by COREDO for clients with multi-level holding structures allows for the correct reflection of the ownership chain and avoids declaration errors.

New EU Requirements for Companies on Disclosing Beneficial Owners

Illustration for the section "New EU Requirements for Companies on Disclosing Beneficial Owners" in the article "Establishing a Unified Register of Beneficiaries in the EU — What Changes for Companies"
The reform of EU corporate law has tightened requirements for company beneficial owners and intensified control over their identification. Companies are now required not only to disclose information about ultimate beneficiaries but also to update it with any structural changes.

What Information and Documents Need to Be Submitted to the Register

  • Full name, date of birth, nationality, and residential address of the beneficial owner;
  • information about the shareholding or other control in the company;
  • supporting documents (passport, registry extract, founding documents);
  • electronic signature for filing declarations through a digital platform.
In practice, COREDO has faced questions about how to correctly fill out the declaration of beneficial owners to avoid regulator rejection. It is important to meticulously verify data against the bank’s KYC procedures and internal corporate documents to ensure compliance with legal requirements.

Submission Deadlines for Beneficiary Declaration and Implementation Stages

The deadlines for submitting the beneficiary declaration depend on the jurisdiction, but in most EU countries, companies are required to submit information within 30 days of registration or making changes to the ownership structure. The implementation of the unified register of beneficiaries in the EU is carried out in stages: initially, the integration of national registers, followed by the launch of a pan-European digital platform for data submission and updates.

The COREDO team recommends establishing internal procedures for monitoring structural changes and updating beneficiary data to avoid missing deadlines and sanctions.

Automation of Beneficiary Declaration and EU Digital Platform

The move to automation of beneficiary declaration and the launch of the digital platform for submitting beneficiary data are key elements of the reform. This not only speeds up compliance processes but also reduces the likelihood of errors associated with human factors.

How to Submit Beneficial Owner Information Through the EU Online Platform

  • registration on the digital platform using an electronic signature;
  • filling out the form with automated data verification;
  • uploading supporting documents;
  • receiving notification of acceptance and review status.
The COREDO solution for automating compliance processes allows integration of a company’s internal systems with the EU governmental platform, significantly saving time and resources. This approach is especially effective for international holdings where simultaneous beneficiary declaration is required in multiple jurisdictions.

Integration of AML Systems with EU Registers and Best Practices

Integration of AML systems with EU registers is a crucial stage for companies working with financial licenses and subject to mandatory due diligence. Best practices include:

  • automated verification of beneficiaries’ data against international and national registers;
  • regular audits of the corporate structure;
  • data exchange between registers in the EU, Asia, and Africa for global groups.
COREDO practice confirms: integration of internal AML platforms with government registers minimizes risks and improves compliance quality, which is especially important when obtaining banking, crypto and payment licenses.

Responsibility and Risks: Fines for Non-Disclosure of Beneficiaries

The tightening of control over the disclosure of beneficiaries entails not only administrative but also criminal liability for company directors and owners. Business risks for non-compliance with new rules include account blockage, loss of licenses, and reputational damage.

Violation Sanctions and Fines Consequences for Business
Late Disclosure Administrative fines Account access restriction
Concealing Beneficiaries Large fines, account blockage Criminal liability, reputational risks
Data Errors Correction, re-submission Enhanced oversight, audit

What Happens for Concealing Beneficiary Information in Europe

Concealing beneficiary information in Europe is punishable by large fines, account blockages, and even criminal liability for directors. In some cases, blocking EU sanctions against companies can occur, leading to a complete halt of operations and loss of business reputation. The solution developed by COREDO for clients with an international structure includes regular audits of corporate structure and automated data checks to minimize such risks.

Typical Errors in Declaring Beneficial Owners

COREDO’s experience shows that the most common errors in declaring beneficial owners are related to:

  • incorrect identification of the ultimate beneficiary;
  • untimely data updates with structural changes;
  • inconsistency of data with internal KYC procedures and bank requirements.

Compliance procedures for international companies should include regular data checks and staff training on new EU standards.

Impact of the Unified Beneficiary Register on Business and Investment Climate

Illustration for the section "Impact of the Unified Beneficiary Register on Business and Investment Climate" in the article "Establishing a Unified Register of Beneficiaries in the EU — What Changes for Companies"
The implementation of the unified beneficiary register significantly changes the rules for international business. On one hand, corporate transparency for investors is strengthened, which increases trust and facilitates funding attraction. On the other hand, the burden on corporate governance and compliance departments increases.

How New EU Rules Affect Company Investment Attractiveness

Company ownership transparency becomes a key factor for investors and banks. New EU requirements for beneficiary disclosure allow for simpler due diligence procedures and reduced risks for financial institutions. The COREDO solution for automating the submission of beneficiary information has already helped clients expedite funding and improve investment attractiveness.

Features of Beneficiary Disclosure for Holding and Multi-Level Structures

For holding and multi-level structures, disclosing beneficiaries requires special attention: it is important to accurately reflect the entire ownership chain, including foreign and nominee shareholders. Auditing the corporate structure and automating compliance processes help avoid errors and ensure compliance with new EU requirements.

Protection of Beneficiaries’ Personal Data and GDPR

Illustration for the section "Protection of Beneficiaries’ Personal Data and GDPR" in the article "Establishing a Unified Register of Beneficiaries in the EU — What Changes for Companies"
In the context of digitalization and data exchange between EU, Asia, and Africa registries, the protection of beneficiaries’ personal data comes to the forefront. Companies must comply not only with European GDPR standards but also with international FATF standards for preventing money laundering.

How to Ensure Data Protection for Beneficiaries in New Conditions

To ensure the protection of beneficiaries’ personal data, COREDO recommends:

  • using automated verification systems with data encryption;
  • restricting register access to authorized individuals only;
  • regularly performing compliance audits to GDPR and FATF standards.
Our experience shows: integrating internal systems with government platforms requires special attention to cybersecurity and information protection.

Restrictions and Exceptions: When a Company May Not Disclose Beneficiaries

In some cases, a company may be exempt from disclosing beneficiary information—for example, if shares are traded on regulated markets or the company is under blocking sanctions. However, such exceptions are strictly regulated, and attempts to abuse them lead to severe sanctions.

Practical Steps for Companies: How to Prepare for New EU Requirements

Illustration for the section "Practical Steps for Companies: How to Prepare for New EU Requirements" in the article "Establishing a Unified Register of Beneficiaries in the EU — What Changes for Companies"
Implementing new procedures requires a systematic approach and a revision of internal regulations. COREDO’s experience shows that successful adaptation is only possible with close interaction among legal, compliance, and IT departments.

Action Algorithm for Businesses to Implement New Procedures

  1. Audit the corporate structure and identify ultimate beneficiaries.
  2. Update internal KYC and AML policies considering new EU requirements.
  3. Implement automated tools for submitting and updating beneficiary data.
  4. Appoint individuals responsible for monitoring structural changes and timely declarations.
  5. Organize personnel training on new compliance procedures.
  6. Prepare for the inspection of beneficiary data by governmental bodies.
The solution implemented by the COREDO team for a large holding allowed the automation of beneficiary data updates during company reorganization and avoided fines for untimely disclosure.

Automation Tools and Best Practices for Compliance with New Requirements

The most effective tools for complying with new EU requirements are:

  • automated compliance platforms with integration into government registers;
  • electronic document management and electronic signature systems;
  • services for automatic data verification and monitoring of structural changes.
COREDO practice shows: digitizing legal services and automating compliance processes not only reduce costs but also improve corporate governance and risk management quality.

Key Conclusions and Recommendations for Entrepreneurs and Leaders

The implementation of the EU unified register of beneficiaries is not just a new formality but a strategic challenge and opportunity for business. Companies that timely adapt their compliance procedures, automate declarations, and ensure personal data protection receive:

  • access to financial services and investments;
  • reduced corporate risks and reputational losses;
  • increased transparency for investors and partners.
COREDO’s experience confirms: a systematic approach to AML compliance, corporate structure audits, and digital platform implementation is the key to sustainable development and long-term success in European and international markets.

According to international studies, up to 40% of companies face banking refusals to open accounts after registering abroad due to document errors or non-compliance with compliance procedures. Even more alarming statistics: every third entrepreneur who opens a business in Europe or Asia faces tax risks and penalties within the first year of operation. Why is this happening, despite the availability of information?

Why do companies make mistakes when registering a business abroad?

The international company registration market is more complex today than ever: changing regulatory requirements, tightening of AML compliance, sanctions restrictions, as well as growing demands for substance and transparency of the corporate structure. An error at the registration stage can lead not only to financial losses but also to account blockages, reputational risks, and the inability to scale the business.

I observe how many entrepreneurs underestimate the depth of these challenges, relying on outdated schemes or unverified intermediaries. In this article, I will analyze 5 key mistakes in registering a legal entity abroad that the COREDO team has identified in practice and offer concrete strategies to prevent them. If you want to not just open a company, but build a sustainable international business, read until the end: you will receive not only risk analysis but also tools for their minimization.

Why do companies make mistakes when registering a business abroad

Illustration for the section 'Why do companies make mistakes when registering a business abroad' in the article '5 mistakes when registering a legal entity abroad'
International corporate law imposes a complex set of requirements for registering a legal entity abroad, which often change depending on the jurisdiction. In practice, the COREDO team has repeatedly encountered situations where even experienced entrepreneurs make mistakes due to:

  • Lack of information about the specifics of legislation in the selected country;
  • Complexity of due diligence procedures and identification of beneficial owners;
  • Lack of understanding of current compliance risks and requirements to the corporate structure;
  • Rapidly changing regulatory standards (especially in the EU, Singapore, UAE, Cyprus, and Malta).

As a result, mistakes in registering a company abroad lead to delays, increased costs, refusals in banking services, and even the impossibility to start operational activities.

Mistake #1. Wrong choice of jurisdiction for business

Illustration for the section 'Mistake #1. Wrong choice of jurisdiction for business' in the article '5 mistakes when registering a legal entity abroad'

How to choose a jurisdiction to register a company in the EU, Asia, or Africa

One of the most common missteps is choosing a jurisdiction “on the advice of acquaintances” or based solely on the low cost of registration. In practice, COREDO has demonstrated that the optimal jurisdiction is determined not only by the tax rate but also by:

  • Substance requirements (real presence): for example, in the EU and the UK, regulators increasingly require confirmation of the presence of an office, staff, and business activity.
  • Political stability and transparency of legislation: business registration in Asia (e.g., Singapore) is attractive due to its predictable legal environment and developed investment protection system.
  • Opportunities for business immigration and market access: for some COREDO clients, opening a company in Europe became a key to entering new markets and obtaining residency permits.
  • Corporate structure features: In Poland, Cyprus, or Malta, charter requirements and PKD codes (types of activity) differ, affecting business opportunities.

Sanctions and regulatory risks when choosing a country

Sanctions restrictions and automatic exchange of tax information (CRS/FATCA) are another trap for international business. The solution developed by COREDO involves mandatory auditing of sanctions and political risks before registration: we analyze not only current restrictions but also the likelihood of their tightening. For example, registering a company in the UAE or Singapore requires considering beneficiary transparency requirements and readiness for automatic information exchange with tax authorities of other countries.

Incorrect choice of jurisdiction can lead to account opening refusals, payment blockages, and reputational losses – especially if the country falls under international sanctions or is suspected of inadequate transparency.

Mistake #2. Ignoring AML compliance and KYC procedures

Illustration for the section 'Mistake #2. Ignoring AML compliance and KYC procedures' in the article '5 mistakes when registering a legal entity abroad'

How to ensure AML/KYC compliance when registering a business

Today, banks and payment systems (Payoneer, Wise, Stripe, PayPal) impose demands on foreign companies comparable to financial institutions’ requirements. In practice, COREDO confirms: insufficient attention to AML compliance and KYC procedures leads to account blocking, service refusal, and fines.

Key points:

  • Identification and verification of founders and beneficiaries: a complete package of documents proving identity, source of funds, lack of criminal records, and sanction risks is required.
  • Development and implementation of KYC/AML policy: for companies operating in the financial sector (crypto, payment services, investment platforms), this is a mandatory condition for obtaining a license and opening accounts.
  • Compliance with international standards of corporate documents: banks and regulators require transparency in the ownership and control structure.

Problems with opening a business account for a foreign company

Even after successfully registering a company abroad, many face the problem of opening a business account. Reasons:

  • Corporate documents not meeting bank requirements;
  • Doubts about business substance;
  • Lack of transparent corporate reporting.

The COREDO team has implemented comprehensive support for the registration of a legal entity and account opening: we prepare the document package in advance, taking into account the requirements of specific banks and payment systems, and conduct internal due diligence.

Mistake #3. Incorrect preparation of corporate documents

Illustration for the section 'Mistake #3. Incorrect preparation of corporate documents' in the article '5 mistakes when registering a legal entity abroad'

How to ensure corporate documents meet international standards

Errors in corporate documents are one of the most common reasons for a company’s registration or account opening refusal. An example from COREDO practice: a client, registering a business in Asia, did not consider local requirements for the operating agreement and charter, leading to the need for a complete revision of the documents and project startup delay.

Important aspects:

  • The corporate charter and operating agreement should reflect the management structure, rights, and obligations of the participants, profit distribution order, and comply with international standards (especially in cross-border transactions).
  • PKD codes and types of activity: errors in their selection can lead to the inability to obtain a license or refusal to open a bank account.
  • Offshore company registration requires special attention to the requirements of registration authorities and compliance with corporate reporting.

Errors in choosing the type of activity and corporate structure

The choice of corporate structure influences tax residency, the possibility of using nominee services (nominee directors/shareholders), intellectual property protection, and tax burden optimization. COREDO’s practice shows that errors at this stage can pose not only legal but also reputational risks.

Mistake #4. Underestimating tax and reporting risks

Illustration for the section 'Mistake #4. Underestimating tax and reporting risks' in the article '5 mistakes when registering a legal entity abroad'

How to avoid double taxation when registering internationally

Double taxation risks are one of the main causes of financial losses when registering a legal entity abroad. International tax optimization requires:

  • Accurate determination of the tax residency of the company and its beneficiaries;
  • Analysis of double tax treaties between the countries of presence;
  • Consideration of automatic exchange of tax information requirements (CRS/FATCA).

At COREDO, we recommend modeling the tax load in advance and developing scenarios for interaction with tax authorities in different jurisdictions.

Corporate reporting issues and real presence requirements

Delayed reporting, non-compliance with substance requirements (presence of an office, staff, business activity) are frequent reasons for fines and denial of banking services. Company registration without a physical office requires specific attention to corporate reporting issues and audit preparedness.

COREDO clients receive detailed instructions on maintaining reporting and preparing for regulator audits in each selected jurisdiction.

Mistake #5. Working with unreliable intermediaries and lack of comprehensive legal support

How to choose a reliable consulting partner

One of the most dangerous mistakes: trusting the registration of a company abroad to unverified intermediaries. Consequences: loss of funds, data leaks, registration or account opening refusal, reputational risks.

Recommendations from COREDO:

  • Conduct due diligence on intermediaries: check for licenses, reviews, legal history, experience with the chosen jurisdiction.
  • Check board members for criminal records and sanction risks.
  • Demand transparency in judicial fees, nominee service, and corporate beneficiaries.

Practical recommendations for service quality control

  • Use electronic company registration only through official portals and accredited agents.
  • Carefully study licensing conditions for specific activity types (financial, insurance, investment services).
  • Include force majeure and intermediary liability for regulatory requirements clauses in contracts.

COREDO’s implemented projects demonstrate: comprehensive legal support for business: the key to the long-term stability and scalability of an international company.

Key conclusions and practical recommendations

Mistake Consequences Best practices
Wrong choice of jurisdiction Sanctions, tax risks, account denial Analyze substance, political risks
Ignoring AML/KYC Account block, fines, service denial Implement KYC/AML policy, prepare documents
Errors in corporate documents Registration denial, bank issues Check standards, involve experts
Underestimating tax and reporting risks Double taxation, fines Optimize structure, meet deadlines
Working with unreliable intermediaries Loss of funds, reputational risks Conduct due diligence, choose verified

Practical recommendations:

  • Conduct a thorough jurisdiction analysis: consider substance requirements, political stability, sanctions, and tax risks.
  • Prepare corporate documents according to international standards: consider requirements for charter, operating agreement, PKD codes.
  • Implement AML/KYC policy considering your sector’s specifics: prepare a full document package for banks and regulators.
  • Optimize tax load and corporate structure: model tax scenarios, consider double tax treaties.
  • Conduct due diligence on all intermediaries and partners: check their licenses, reputation, legal history.

FAQ: Frequently Asked Questions about registering a business abroad

1. What documents are needed to open a business account for a foreign company?
The package usually includes the charter, operating agreement, beneficiary documents, address confirmation, KYC/AML policy, and a business plan.
2. How to choose a corporate structure for international business?
Consider the business goals, tax residency requirements, asset protection, and nominee service opportunities.
3. What are the real presence (substance) requirements in Europe and Asia?
Most jurisdictions require a physical office, staff, real business activities confirmed by corporate reporting.
4. How to check board members for criminal records and sanctions?
Use international databases, requests in state registers, conduct due diligence with expert involvement.
5. What to do if a bank refuses to open a foreign company account?
Audit corporate documents, fix mismatches, prepare an alternative package for other banks or international payment systems.
6. How to avoid mistakes when filling the charter of a company in Poland or Singapore?
Involve lawyers familiar with local requirements, check compliance of corporate documents with international standards.
7. What are the consequences of late reporting of a foreign company?
Fines, account blockage, loss of tax benefits, difficulties in subsequent licensing and business scaling.
Registering a legal entity abroad introduces an entrepreneur to many nuances and risks. COREDO’s experience shows: only a systematic approach, attention to detail, and professional support can help avoid critical mistakes and create a sustainable international company.

In 2024, the global market for AML violation fines exceeded $6.6 billion, with regulators in the EU alone imposing over 800 sanctions for non-compliance with anti-money laundering standards in the past 12 months. These figures are not just statistics but a real indicator of how high the risks are for any international business that ignores compliance and AML audit requirements. Reputational losses, account freezes, loss of partners, and even criminal liability become inevitable consequences for companies that underestimate the strategic role of AML checks.

Why is the issue of undergoing an AML audit and building an effective corporate risk management system so pressing? Today, financial and legal regulators in the EU, Asia, and Africa are synchronizing their approaches by implementing FATF standards and EU directives, with increasing demands for business transparency and client due diligence. At COREDO, we regularly encounter cases where even experienced international companies face sudden AML audit requests or risk fines for AML violations due to non-obvious procedural gaps.

Ask yourself: Is your business ready to pass an AML audit without critical remarks, and how protected are you from sanctions and reputational risks?

If you have doubts, this article is for you. I will explain how to pass an AML audit in an international company, avoid fines, and build compliance that becomes a competitive advantage rather than a formality. Read to the end, as you will receive not only practical recommendations but also strategic ideas based on COREDO’s real experience in the EU, Asia, and CIS.

What is an AML audit and AML check: key concepts and stages

Illustration for the section "What is an AML audit and AML check: key concepts and stages" in the article "How to Pass an AML Audit and Avoid Fines in International Business"

An AML audit is a comprehensive independent review of the anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing system (Anti-Money Laundering), including the assessment of compliance effectiveness, KYC procedures, internal policies, and transaction monitoring tools. In international business, undergoing an AML audit is not just a regulatory requirement but a key element of corporate risk management and long-term sustainability.

Main stages of an AML audit for international business

In practice, the COREDO team implements the following algorithm:

  • Preliminary AML risk audit: analysis of the business model, client base, payment channels used, and geography of operations.
  • Assessment and testing of internal AML procedures: checking the completeness and relevance of internal policies, compliance with FATF standards and EU directives (4AMLD–6AMLD).
  • Verification of KYC procedures and client due diligence: analysis of the completeness of beneficiary identification, checks against sanction lists, and monitoring of suspicious transactions.
  • Transaction analysis for AML compliance: testing automated monitoring systems, detecting anomalies, evaluating the effectiveness of responses to suspicious operations.
  • Final report and recommendations: preparing a report with identified risks, a list of violations, and a roadmap for closing gaps.
The experience of COREDO shows: systematic AML risk audits not only help avoid fines but also enhance the company’s investment attractiveness to international partners.

The role of KYC procedures and client identification

KYC (Know Your Customer) is a fundamental part of AML compliance. In international business, digital client identification, analysis of sources of funds, and detection of suspicious transactions are becoming standard. COREDO-developed solutions include the implementation of automated KYC platforms, integration with global sanction lists, and developing a “know your customer” policy at all holding levels. This minimizes the risk of being blacklisted and ensures the transparency of the client portfolio.

International standards and directives: FATF, 4AMLD–6AMLD

The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) establishes global standards for combating money laundering, while EU directives (4AMLD, 5AMLD, 6AMLD) set mandatory requirements for companies operating in Europe. COREDO’s practice confirms that integrating international AML standards and continuously monitoring changes in regulatory requirements are keys to successfully passing an AML check in any jurisdiction.

How to prepare for an AML audit in an international company

Illustration for the section "How to prepare for an AML audit in an international company" in the article "How to Pass an AML Audit and Avoid Fines in International Business"

Comprehensive preparation for an external AML audit begins with an internal compliance audit and the implementation of current internal AML policies. At this stage, not only the formal presence of documents is important, but also the real operability of procedures.

Risk audit and implementation of internal AML policies

At COREDO, we recommend starting with an AML risk assessment: analyze business processes, identify vulnerabilities, and conduct an internal compliance audit. Based on the results, internal AML policies are developed and implemented, covering:

  • procedures for client and beneficiary identification,
  • transaction monitoring algorithms,
  • AML reporting standards (including the preparation of Suspicious Activity Reports – SAR),
  • regulations for internal investigations into AML violations.
Corporate responsibility for AML is not just a regulatory requirement but a tool for protecting a business from financial and reputational losses.

Staff training and the formation of a compliance corporate culture

Effective AML compliance is impossible without regular employee training. Our experience at COREDO has shown that AML specialist training and certification programs, internal seminars on identifying suspicious transactions, and incident investigations significantly increase the company’s readiness for external audits and regulatory inspections. A compliance corporate culture is formed by involving all personnel levels in AML control processes.

Documents and regulations for successful audit passage

A full set of documents is necessary for the successful completion of an external AML audit:

  • internal AML policies and procedures,
  • KYC regulations,
  • transaction monitoring logs,
  • reports on suspicious operations (SARs),
  • documents on internal investigations and compliance audit results.
The COREDO team supports clients at all stages of preparation, ensuring documentation compliance with international standards and regulatory requirements.

AML compliance in the EU, Asia, and Africa: features and differences

Approaches to AML compliance vary significantly across regions, requiring flexibility and a deep understanding of local requirements from international business.

Region Key requirements and directives Audit specifications Documents and reporting
EU 4AMLD, 5AMLD, 6AMLD, FATF Strict control, emphasis on KYC SAR, internal policies, reports
Asia FATF, local regulators Country-specific, focus on FIU Local forms, KYC
Africa FATF, regional standards Lack of unification, risks Simple KYC, local reports

EU, directives 4AMLD, 5AMLD, 6AMLD, and best practices

The European Union imposes some of the strictest requirements on businesses: mandatory beneficiary identification, transaction monitoring automation, and integration with national and international sanction lists. For fintech companies and payment institutions, implementing procedures that fully comply with FATF directives and 6AMLD becomes a mandatory condition for obtaining licenses and accessing banking infrastructure. COREDO solutions for implementing automated AML systems enable our clients to successfully pass inspections and minimize the risk of AML violation fines.

Asia: local requirements and interaction with regulators

In Asia, AML compliance requirements vary from country to country: in Singapore and Hong Kong, there is strict supervision by FIUs and mandatory external AML audits for financial institutions, while in some other countries, the focus is on local reporting forms and specific KYC requirements. COREDO’s experience in supporting the registration and licensing of companies in Singapore and Hong Kong shows: the key to success is adapting internal policies to local standards and establishing effective interaction with regulators.

Africa: AML audit specifics and documentation

In African countries, there is often a lack of standardization, creating additional risks for international businesses. To successfully pass an AML check here, it is important to prepare simplified KYC procedures, adapt internal policies to regional requirements, and ensure transparency in reporting. In COREDO’s cases of supporting clients in Africa, special attention is paid to preparing local forms and interacting with national financial intelligence units.

How to avoid fines for AML violations: practical recommendations

Illustration for the section "How to avoid fines for AML violations: practical recommendations" in the article "How to Pass an AML Audit and Avoid Fines in International Business"
Fines for AML violations can reach tens of millions of euros, with further consequences including account blocking, license revocation, partner loss, and reputational risks. Avoiding AML fines requires not only formal compliance but also the actual effectiveness of implemented procedures.

Typical mistakes when preparing for an AML audit

The most common mistakes encountered by the COREDO team:

  • a formal approach to implementing internal AML policies,
  • insufficient automation of transaction monitoring,
  • outdated KYC procedures and lack of regular client data updates,
  • weak preparation for an external AML audit,
  • lack of internal compliance audit and incident investigation system.
COREDO’s practice confirms: regular internal compliance audits and stress testing of procedures allow identifying and correcting errors before the regulator’s arrival.

Integration of KYC and AML into corporate risk management strategy

Effective corporate risk management is built on integrating KYC and AML processes into a single system. Solutions developed by COREDO include:

  • automation of KYC procedures,
  • integration of AML and KYC into ERP systems,
  • establishing a corporate AML responsibility system,
  • regular assessment of AML program effectiveness using KPI and metrics.
This allows minimizing operational costs for AML compliance without losing effectiveness and increasing the business’s transparency for partners and regulators.

Interaction with regulators and financial intelligence units

In international practice, timely and accurate reporting of suspicious operations (SAR) and establishing a constructive dialogue with financial intelligence units (FIUs) are crucially important. COREDO’s experience shows that transparency, proactive positioning, and readiness for open communication with regulators significantly reduce the risk of sanctions and simplify the passage of external audits.

Technologies and automation of AML processes: modern solutions

Illustration for the section "Technologies and automation of AML processes: modern solutions" in the article "How to Pass an AML Audit and Avoid Fines in International Business"
Modern AML compliance is not possible without introducing automated monitoring systems, artificial intelligence, and RegTech solutions, which not only increase efficiency but also reduce costs.

Artificial intelligence and machine learning in AML

The deployment of artificial intelligence for transaction monitoring and anomaly analysis has become standard for large international holdings. Examples from COREDO practice show: using machine learning allows identifying complex money laundering schemes, automating the analysis of AML compliance transactions, and significantly accelerating audit passage.

Blockchain and digital customer identification

Blockchain technologies and digital customer identification open new possibilities for transparency and reliability in KYC procedures. Implementing mobile solutions and integrating with global digital identification platforms allow COREDO to implement projects for automating KYC and reducing the risk of errors in beneficiary identification.

Selecting and implementing RegTech solutions for international companies

RegTech solutions for AML involve not only automating reporting and monitoring but also integrating AML processes into corporate ERP systems, assessing ROI from new technology deployment, and regularly evaluating AML program effectiveness. COREDO’s experience confirms: wisely choosing a RegTech platform and adapting it to business specifics is the key to successfully passing an AML audit and minimizing fine risks.

Key conclusions and practical steps for business

Illustration for the section "Key conclusions and practical steps for business" in the article "How to Pass an AML Audit and Avoid Fines in International Business"

  • Conduct an AML risk audit: start with an internal compliance audit, identify vulnerabilities, and develop a plan to close the gaps.
  • Implement automated transaction monitoring systems: use modern RegTech solutions and artificial intelligence for transaction analysis and identification of suspicious transactions.
  • Update internal AML policies and procedures: adapt documents to the requirements of FATF, EU directives, and local regulators.
  • Organize regular employee training: invest in AML specialist certification and compliance corporate culture formation.
  • Integrate KYC and AML processes into a single risk management strategy: ensure transparency and manageability of procedures at all holding levels.
  • Build open interaction with regulators and FIUs: submit timely reports on suspicious operations and maintain dialogue with supervisory bodies.
  • Seek legal business support from experts: COREDO’s experience in international business, licensing, and AML consulting: your resource for minimizing risks and successful development in global markets.
In the modern world, an AML audit is not just a formality but a strategic tool for protecting and growing international business. A reliable compliance system, built on the best global practices and modern technologies, becomes the key to stability, partner trust, and long-term success.

Did you know that, according to international research, more than 60% of companies entering foreign markets encounter legal or compliance errors at the registration stage? Nearly a third of business licensing projects fail due to the wrong choice of consulting partner or non-transparent business processes. In a world where the cost of a single mistake can be measured not only in money but also in reputation, strategy, and even the fate of a business, choosing a partner for company registration abroad and business licensing becomes a matter of survival, not just convenience.

Why do even experienced entrepreneurs get caught in the trap of bureaucracy, lose months on document approvals, or face account blocking due to formal inconsistencies? How to minimize risks, ensure transparency and safety of processes, and most importantly, get real support, not just a formal business registration escort?

This article is not just analytics, but a practical guide based on the experience of COREDO in dozens of jurisdictions in Europe, Asia, and Africa. Here you will find strategic ideas, checklists, and answers to questions that are usually left behind. If you are looking for business consulting services, planning legal entity registration in the EU, Asia, or Africa, considering activity licensing, or choosing a long-term partner, read to the end. You will get tools that really work.

Why choosing a consulting partner is critical for international business

Illustration for the section "Why choosing a consulting partner is critical for international business" in the article "How to Choose a Reliable Consulting Partner for Registration and Licensing"

Risks and consequences of a wrong choice

In COREDO’s practice, there were cases where even large companies lost months and hundreds of thousands of euros due to formal errors at the registration or licensing stage. Major risks:

  • Legal and compliance errors. Insufficient elaboration of compliance procedures leads to license rejection, account blocking, or fines from international regulators (FATF, EU, OFAC).
  • Reputation losses. One unsuccessful case and the reputation of the consulting firm is threatened, and the client’s business becomes toxic to banks and partners.
  • Long-term consequences. Mistakes at the start can lead to the need for a complete business restructuring, a review of corporate governance, and even litigation.
COREDO’s experience confirms: risk assessment when choosing a consulting partner is not a formality but a mandatory step for any entrepreneur who values their business and time.

How consulting services for business impact the success of registration and licensing

Comprehensive consulting is not just about documents. It involves market entry strategy, competent cross-border business structuring, support for M&A transactions, and the implementation of corporate policies that comply with international AML and KYC standards.

A project implemented by the COREDO team for licensing a fintech company in Singapore showed that only the integration of legal support, compliance procedures, and international tax planning allows obtaining permits without delays and minimizing costs at each stage.

Criteria for choosing a consulting partner for registering companies abroad

Illustration for the section "Criteria for choosing a consulting partner for registering companies abroad" in the article "How to Choose a Reliable Consulting Partner for Registration and Licensing"

Checking the reliability of the consulting company: due diligence and compliance

The first step is independent verification (due diligence of consulting companies). It is important to ensure that the partner has:

  • Transparent compliance procedures (presence of a compliance officer, implementation of KYC and AML standards, regular audits).
  • Certification and membership in international associations (for example, recognition by EU regulators or FATF).
  • Independent Legal Expertise, the ability to obtain an opinion from a third party on key issues.
At COREDO, we always recommend that clients request confirmation of compliance policy implementation and results of recent audits.

Assessing experience and expertise: portfolio, reviews, specialization

Expertise is not an abstraction but specific realized cases. What to pay attention to:

  • Consulting firm portfolio: successful projects in relevant jurisdictions (EU, Asia, Africa).
  • Client reviews, not only on the website but also on independent platforms, in professional communities.
  • Specialization: experience in licensing specific types of activities (crypto, fintech, payment services, investment funds).
  • Support for obtaining permits: how quickly and efficiently the company resolves issues with regulators.
The COREDO team, for example, supported the registration and Licensing of banking and crypto companies in the Czech Republic, Estonia, the UK, and Singapore, as confirmed by client reviews and real results.

Reputation and transparency of business processes

The reputation of a consulting firm is not only about impressive cases but also about the transparency of business processes:

  • Corporate services and reporting – regular client updates on project status, access to corporate documentation.
  • Conflict of interest management: documented policies and procedures.
  • Reputation risk assessment: analysis of past cases, absence of litigation and conflicts with regulators.
Solutions developed at COREDO always imply a transparent interaction architecture, allowing the client to control every stage.

Features of registering legal entities and licensing in the EU, Asia, and Africa

Illustration for the section "Features of registering legal entities and licensing in the EU, Asia, and Africa" in the article "How to Choose a Reliable Consulting Partner for Registration and Licensing"

Registration of legal entities in the EU: requirements, documents, licensing

To register a company in the EU, the following are required:

  • Preparation of founding documents, charter, information about beneficial owners.
  • Passing KYC procedures, confirmation of sources of funds.
  • Choosing a registration agent, submitting documents to the local registration authority.
  • In some countries, it is mandatory to have a local director and physical address.
  • For business licensing in the EU (financial, payment, investment services), a separate package of documents is needed, compliance with EU directives and international AML standards.
COREDO’s practice has shown that competent international tax planning and implementation of corporate policies can significantly accelerate the process and minimize business registration support costs.

Registration of companies in Asia: best practices and risks for foreign investors

Asian jurisdictions (Singapore, Hong Kong, UAE) are attractive for their flexibility but require special attention to detail:

  • In Singapore, for example, a local director and registered address are required, and for some types of activities: additional permits from regulators.
  • Key documents: charter, information about management, address confirmation, KYC questionnaires.
  • Business licensing procedures may vary in terms of timing and cost depending on the sector (fintech, crypto, forex).
The COREDO team has implemented projects for supporting the registration and licensing of companies in Singapore and Hong Kong, where special attention was paid to intellectual property protection and automation of legal processes.

Registration of companies in Africa: specifics, cost, typical errors

African markets offer new opportunities but also increased risks:

  • Registration periods can range from 2 to 8 weeks depending on the country.
  • Document requirements often change, requiring local expertise.
  • The cost of legal registration support is higher due to the need for constant monitoring of legislative changes.
  • Typical errors include choosing the wrong form of ownership, incomplete documentation packages, underestimating TCO (total cost of ownership).
COREDO’s solutions for supporting the registration of offshore companies in Africa include strategic partnerships with local agents and the implementation of automated control tools.

# Comparison Table

Jurisdiction Registration Timeframe Main Requirements Cost Key Risks
EU 1–4 weeks Local director, charter, KYC, reporting Medium/High Compliance, tax audits
Asia 1–2 weeks Local director, address, licenses Medium Licensing, regulatory changes
Africa 2–8 weeks Local partner, document adaptation Medium/High Legal uncertainty, TCO

Practical steps: how to choose a consulting company for registration and licensing

Illustration for the section "Practical steps: how to choose a consulting company for registration and licensing" in the article "How to Choose a Reliable Consulting Partner for Registration and Licensing"

Selection algorithm: step-by-step guide

  1. Conduct due diligence: check licenses, history, lawsuits, membership in associations.
  2. Evaluate compliance procedures: presence of a compliance officer, implementation of KYC and AML standards.
  3. Request portfolio and reviews: ensure relevant experience and successful cases.
  4. Agree on SLA (service level agreement): clearly define timelines, stages, and responsibilities of parties.
  5. Check data transfer transparency: use secure channels, clarify storage and processing policy.
  6. Evaluate integration of business processes: how ready the partner is to adapt processes to your tasks.
This algorithm was successfully implemented in a number of COREDO projects for supporting entry into foreign markets for fintech and investment companies.

Questions to ask a consulting partner before signing a contract

  • What is your team’s experience in registering and licensing companies in the chosen jurisdiction?
  • What compliance procedures and KYC tools do you use?
  • How is transparency and security of corporate data transfer ensured?
  • What metrics and quality control tools do you apply?
  • What SLA can you offer and how are project changes documented?
COREDO’s practice confirms: only open dialogue and clear fixation of expectations allow avoiding misunderstandings and ensuring the quality control of services.

How to compare offers based on cost and service volume

  • Evaluate total cost of ownership (TCO): consider not only direct legal registration support costs but also hidden expenses (commissions, additional services, permit support).
  • Comparison by service volume: check if the package includes license support, corporate policy implementation, and legal process automation.
  • SLA and change control: clarify how additional work is documented and how efficiency is evaluated.
COREDO’s solutions are always built on a transparent pricing model and a clear structure of service packages.

Quality control and long-term collaboration with a consulting partner

Illustration for the section "Quality control and long-term collaboration with a consulting partner" in the article "How to Choose a Reliable Consulting Partner for Registration and Licensing"

Metrics and tools for assessing the effectiveness of legal support

  • Speed of registration and obtaining licenses: compare with market benchmarks.
  • Number of corrections and modifications – an indicator of document preparation quality.
  • Level of legal process automation – reduces human factor risks.
  • Corporate reporting and communication transparency: regular reporting and access to documentation.
  • Flexibility in change management, how quickly the partner responds to new regulatory requirements.
COREDO has automated quality control systems and corporate reporting, allowing clients to monitor each project stage in real-time.

Advantages of long-term strategic partnership

  • Integration of business processes – the partner deeply understands your business specifics and can offer proactive solutions.
  • Asset protection and corporate policy implementation: a long-term partner helps not only register but also protect the business.
  • Cost optimization, continuous support minimizes costs at each stage, not just at the start.
  • Flexibility and adaptation to changes – the partner quickly responds to new market challenges and regulatory changes.
COREDO’s many years of experience show that strategic partnerships bring clients not only time and resource savings but also a sustainable competitive advantage.

Key takeaways and recommendations for entrepreneurs and leaders

Choosing a consulting partner for company registration abroad and business licensing is a strategic decision impacting business security, efficiency, and ownership cost.

Recommendations:

  • Always conduct due diligence and assess compliance procedures.
  • Analyze the partner’s portfolio and specialization, especially if specific licenses are involved.
  • Demand transparency of business processes, corporate reporting, and clear SLAs.
  • Compare offers by TCO, service volume, and quality control metrics.
  • Aim for a long-term strategic partnership: it minimizes risks and optimizes costs.
COREDO’s practice proves that only a systematic approach based on international AML standards, corporate policy implementation, and constant quality control allows not just entering new markets but building a sustainable and protected business.

If you are looking for not just a contractor, but a strategic partner who shares your values and is accountable for results: COREDO’s approach will be a reliable foundation for growth and expansion in international markets.

In 2025, international business faces an unprecedented wave of changes: according to the European Commission, more than 65% of companies planning to register in the EU and Asia note the complication of procedures, increased requirements for the disclosure of beneficiaries, and stricter AML compliance. For many executives, these changes become not just a challenge but a strategic question of survival and business scaling. Can your project pass a compliance check in the Czech Republic or Singapore? How to avoid bank rejection when opening a corporate account in Europe? Why is remote company registration in the EU becoming the new norm but requires digital maturity and transparency from founders?

Today, it is not enough just to know the rules – it is important to have practical tools that allow not only to comply with the updated requirements of company registration in the EU 2025 or company registration in Asia 2025 but also to effectively use new opportunities for growth. Over the years, the COREDO team has implemented dozens of projects for legal business support in the EU and Asia, helping clients adapt to legislative changes, minimize risks, and build sustainable corporate structures.

If you are looking for not just an overview of changes but a strategic guide with practical recommendations, this article is your source of solutions and insights. Read to the end to get clear answers to the key questions of 2025 and learn how to use the updated company registration requirements to your advantage.

Key changes in company registration legislation in the EU and Asia in 2025

Illustration for the section "Key changes in company registration legislation in the EU and Asia in 2025" in the article "Updates in company registration requirements in the EU and Asia in 2025"

New company registration requirements in the EU 2025

In 2025, company registration in the EU underwent a series of fundamental changes affecting both documents for company registration in the EU 2025 and the procedure itself. One of the key innovations is mandatory digital identification of founders and the introduction of electronic signatures at all stages, which accelerated remote company registration in the EU and reduced risks of document forgery. COREDO practice confirms: now most EU countries require not only the standard set of founding documents but also confirmation of the source of funds, KYC forms, and disclosure of information about ultimate beneficiaries in accordance with the new beneficiary disclosure requirements 2025.

Particular attention is paid to capital requirements: in the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Estonia, the minimum threshold remains symbolic (from 1 euro), however, for a number of regulated industries (financial services, crypto, payment systems), the requirements have significantly increased. The introduction of electronic registers and registration of a legal address through digital platforms have reduced company registration times in different EU countries to 1–3 weeks for standard businesses and up to 4–6 weeks for high-risk activities.

Updates in business registration rules in Asia 2025

Company registration in Asia 2025 has also become more transparent and technological. In Singapore and Hong Kong, the process of digital identification of founders and automation of KYC procedures became mandatory. A solution developed at COREDO for one of the fintech clients allowed integrating online verification through government platforms, which accelerated the establishment of companies with foreign founders in Asia and reduced legal risks of business registration in Asia.

A significant innovation is the tightening of due diligence of founders: now banks and regulators require detailed financial monitoring of new companies, as well as confirmation of business reputation and sources of capital origin. For high-risk and IT companies in Asia, separate compliance procedures have emerged when opening a business, including the mandatory integration of AML services into business processes and the appointment of a compliance officer.

Comparative table of changes in the EU and Asia

Criterion EU (2025) Asia (2025)
Main documents Certificate of incorporation, charter, KYC, AML Founding documents, KYC, AML
Registration periods 1–5 weeks (depends on the country) 2–6 weeks (depends on the country)
Requirements for beneficiaries Full disclosure, digital identification Enhanced requirements, KYC, sanction lists
Remote registration Implemented in many countries Being gradually implemented, depends on jurisdiction
AML compliance Strict, integration of digital solutions Enhanced, automation of procedures
Features for high-risk business Increased control, Licensing Additional checks, restrictions

Practical aspects of business registration in 2025: documents, timelines, remote procedures

Illustration for the section "Practical aspects of business registration in 2025: documents, timelines, remote procedures" in the article "Updates in company registration requirements in the EU and Asia in 2025"

Documents for company registration in the EU and Asia in 2025

COREDO’s experience shows that in 2025, the standard set of documents for company registration in the EU includes:

  • certificate of incorporation and charter,
  • confirmation of the legal address,
  • digital identification of founders (video verification, eIDAS, BankID),
  • KYC forms and information about beneficiaries,
  • confirmation of the source of funds,
  • electronic signatures.
For the registration of companies with foreign founders in Asia, additionally notarized translations of documents, certificates of business reputation, and information about the corporate structure (SPV, holding) may be required. The implementation of electronic platforms allows opening a company in Europe without personal presence if all documents are prepared correctly.

Remote company registration and digitalization of procedures

Remote company registration in the EU has become standard for most jurisdictions. The COREDO team implemented projects where electronic submission of documents and the introduction of electronic signatures allowed clients to complete all registration stages in 7–10 days. A key condition is the correct digital identification of founders and the integration of AML services into business processes. In Asia, the automation of legal procedures is developing unevenly: it is already the norm in Singapore and Hong Kong, while in other countries it is being implemented gradually.

Timelines and cost of company registration in various European and Asian countries

The timelines for company registration in different EU countries range from 1 week (Estonia, Cyprus) to 4–6 weeks (United Kingdom, Luxembourg) for complex structures. In Asia, registration takes 2–6 weeks, depending on the jurisdiction and the completeness of due diligence of founders. The cost depends on the chosen country, the volume of legal services for company registration, and the need for licensing of certain types of activities. For business immigration to Europe, timelines may increase due to additional checks and the issuance of a business visa for founders.

AML compliance and beneficiary disclosure: new challenges for businesses

Illustration for the section "AML compliance and beneficiary disclosure: new challenges for businesses" in the article "Updates in company registration requirements in the EU and Asia in 2025"

AML compliance for new companies in the EU and Asia

AML compliance for new companies in 2025 requires not only standard KYC procedures but also the integration of digital solutions for financial monitoring of new companies. In the EU, automated data exchange between registrars and banks became mandatory, allowing potential risks to be identified at an early stage. In Asia, compliance procedures for business registration have been tightened: banks require transparency of the corporate structure, the appointment of a compliance officer, and regular reports on funds movements.

New requirements for beneficiary disclosure and confidentiality

In 2025, new requirements for beneficiary disclosure 2025 came into effect: now all EU countries and most Asian jurisdictions require full disclosure of ultimate owners, including digital identification of founders and checks against sanctions lists. A solution developed at COREDO allows automating due diligence of founders and reducing legal risks of business registration in Asia. However, increased transparency reduces business confidentiality – balancing this becomes a key challenge for owners.

Liability of directors and corporate governance

The liability of directors during company registration in 2025 has significantly increased: significant fines and even criminal liability are provided for inaccurate information about beneficiaries and non-compliance with compliance procedures. Effective corporate governance requires the introduction of ESG criteria for new companies, regular compliance officer training, and automation of internal control processes.

Bank requirements and financial monitoring for new companies

Illustration for the section "Bank requirements and financial monitoring for new companies" in the article "Updates in company registration requirements in the EU and Asia in 2025"

Opening corporate accounts and banking requirements in the EU and Asia

Banking requirements for new companies in the EU have become stricter: banks require not only standard KYC documents but also confirmation of business reputation, a business plan, information about the corporate structure, and the source of funds. For high-risk businesses and foreign founders, opening corporate accounts in European banks is possible only if full AML compliance is met and transparency of all transactions is ensured. COREDO’s experience shows: to avoid bank rejection when opening a new company account in Europe, it is important to prepare a complete set of documents in advance and conduct preliminary due diligence of founders.

In Asia, banks have also tightened requirements, especially for companies with foreign capital and complex structures. Financial monitoring of new companies is carried out in real time, and non-compliance with compliance procedures may lead to account blockages.

Financial reporting, audit, and tax benefits for new companies

Corporate reporting in the EU and Asia in 2025 requires not only the timely submission of financial reports but also the integration of ESG criteria data. For new companies in Europe, tax benefits are available, especially in the IT and innovation sectors, provided agreements on the avoidance of double taxation and international tax planning are observed. In Asia, the emphasis is on transparency and automation of financial monitoring and reporting, which reduces risks for investors and partners.

Features of registration of companies with foreign capital and high-risk businesses

Illustration for the section "Features of registration of companies with foreign capital and high-risk businesses" in the article "Updates in company registration requirements in the EU and Asia in 2025"

Registration of companies with foreign founders in Asia and Europe

Registering a company with foreign founders in Asia and Europe requires enhanced due diligence of founders, confirmation of the source of funds, and often obtaining a business visa for founders. The COREDO team successfully supported projects where business immigration to Europe was carried out through creating SPV structures, optimizing the tax burden, and ensuring transparency of corporate governance.

Features of registration of high-risk and IT companies in the EU and Asia

Features of registering high-risk businesses in Europe and Asia include mandatory licensing of certain activities, additional checks against sanctions lists, and the implementation of regulatory sandboxes for testing innovative business models. For IT companies in Europe, special support programs are in place, including accelerated registration, tax benefits, and intellectual property protection. A solution implemented by COREDO for a fintech client allowed obtaining an EU license in record time through the automation of legal procedures and integration of AML services.

Innovations and automation: new tools for registration and business management

Automation of legal procedures and digital identification

In 2025, the automation of legal procedures became a key trend: the introduction of electronic signatures, digital identification of founders, and integration of AML services into business processes accelerate company registration and reduce compliance costs. Regulatory sandboxes and business accelerators in the EU and Asia allow testing new solutions in a safe environment. COREDO’s practice shows that automation not only speeds up processes but also reduces the risk of errors in document preparation.

ESG criteria and their impact on company registration in Europe

The integration of ESG criteria for new companies in Europe becomes a mandatory element of corporate reporting. Companies that integrate ESG approaches in corporate governance and financial monitoring gain access to additional benefits and investment programs. A solution by COREDO for a client in the Czech Republic not only reduced audit costs but also increased the business’s investment attractiveness due to transparency and sustainability.

Selecting jurisdiction and business scaling strategy in 2025

The best countries for registering businesses and IT companies in Europe and Asia

In 2025, the best countries for registering an IT company in Europe: Estonia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, thanks to flexible corporate legislation, low tax rates, and the possibility of remote company registration in the EU. For business scaling in Asia, Singapore and Hong Kong are the most attractive: here, the minimum capital requirements, developed infrastructure, and fast procedures for opening a company abroad 2025.

Choosing a jurisdiction for registering a company in Asia in 2025 should take into account not only tax benefits but also features of the corporate structure (SPV, holding), requirements for beneficiary disclosure, and the existence of double taxation avoidance agreements.

Strategies for minimizing legal and compliance risks

Best practices for managing legal risks when entering EU and Asia markets include:

  • conducting comprehensive due diligence of founders and partners,
  • appointing an experienced compliance officer,
  • regular monitoring of sanctions lists,
  • automation of compliance procedures,
  • integration of digital AML services.
A solution implemented by COREDO for an international group allowed minimizing legal risks of business registration in Asia and ensuring the stability of the corporate structure at all stages of scaling.

Key takeaways and practical recommendations for entrepreneurs and executives

The year 2025 brings new challenges for company registration in the EU 2025 and business registration in Europe 2025, as well as for opening companies in Asia. Success depends on readiness for digitalization, transparency of the corporate structure, and readiness for enhanced AML compliance. COREDO practice confirms: timely document preparation, choice of optimal jurisdiction, and automation of legal procedures allow not only to comply with updated company registration requirements but also to create sustainable business models.

Checklist for registering a company in the EU/Asia in 2025:

  • Prepare a complete set of founding documents considering new beneficiary disclosure requirements.
  • Complete digital identification of founders and ensure electronic submission of documents.
  • Appoint a compliance officer and integrate AML services into business processes.
  • Select a jurisdiction taking into account industry requirements, tax benefits, and remote registration opportunities.
  • Conduct due diligence of founders and partners, check against sanctions lists.
  • Prepare a business plan and documents for opening corporate accounts in European or Asian banks.
  • Implement ESG criteria and automate corporate reporting.
The COREDO team is ready to be your reliable partner at all stages: from choosing a jurisdiction to full legal support of business in the EU and Asia, ensuring compliance with the new standards of 2025 and sustainable growth of your project.

“`html

Introduction: Why It Is Important to Open a Bank Account Abroad for an International Company

Illustration for the section "Introduction: Why It Is Important to Open a Bank Account Abroad for an International Company" in the article "How to Open a Bank Account in a Foreign Bank for an International Company"
Did you know that more than 60% of international companies face rejection on their first attempt to open a corporate account abroad? And this is not just bureaucracy; behind every rejection is a complex system of compliance checks, changing regulatory requirements, and increasing de-risking risks. Today, as business seeks globalization, opening a bank account for an international company is not just a formality, but a strategic step that determines scalability, financial flexibility, and business resilience.

Why are entrepreneurs from Europe, Asia, and the CIS increasingly choosing foreign banks? Because a corporate account abroad is not only access to multi-currency operations and international payments but also a tool for tax optimization, asset protection, and entering new markets. However, the path to such an account is fraught with pitfalls: from choosing a jurisdiction and bank to undergoing strict AML/KYC procedures and confirming economic substance.

If you are a business owner or manager planning to go beyond your home jurisdiction, this article is your practical guide. There are no common phrases or template advice here. Only specifics, verified cases from the COREDO team, and step-by-step instructions to help you not only open an account but do it as efficiently as possible, taking into account the latest trends of 2025.

Opening a Bank Account Abroad: Strategic Advantages for International Business

Illustration for the section "Opening a Bank Account Abroad: Strategic Advantages for International Business" in the article "How to Open a Bank Account in a Foreign Bank for an International Company"

What Tasks Does a Corporate Account Abroad Solve?

A corporate account in a foreign bank is not just a “wallet” for international payments. It is a key element of corporate structuring that allows:

  • Conducting multi-currency transactions without losses on conversion and currency control.
  • Optimizing taxation by choosing a jurisdiction with a favorable tax regime and participating in international agreements (CRS, FATCA, BEPS).
  • Increasing partner trust: an account in a respectable bank in the EU, Asia, or the Middle East enhances the company’s image.
  • Streamlining the management of holding structures: centralizing group finances, minimizing transaction costs.
  • Gaining access to modern financial services – corporate cards, payment gateways, integration with ERP systems, automation of cash management.
In practice, the COREDO team has repeatedly encountered situations where the absence of a foreign account became a barrier to entering global markets or participating in international tenders. For example, for an IT company from the Czech Republic, opening an account in Singapore allowed not only entry into the Asian market but also attracting investments from regional funds, the company’s banking history became part of the investors’ due diligence.

When and Who Needs an Account in a Foreign Bank

A corporate account abroad is not necessary for everyone, but there are situations when it is indispensable:

  • International expansion: entering new markets, opening branches, working with foreign clients and suppliers.
  • Tax burden optimization: using double taxation avoidance agreements, participating in IP-box and other preferential regimes.
  • Asset protection, diversification of banking risks, minimizing the impact of local crises.
  • Working with cryptocurrency, fintech, payment systems: many traditional banks do not work with such businesses, while specialized jurisdictions (Malta, Estonia, Singapore) offer licensed solutions.
  • Complex ownership structure – holdings, SPVs, trusts require transparent banking support.
It is important to understand: the choice between offshore and onshore jurisdiction is not a matter of “where it is easier”, but a strategic decision that affects reputation, access to financing, and the long-term sustainability of the business. COREDO’s practice shows: even for companies from the CIS, opening an account in the EU or Asia today is not a luxury, but a necessity for business growth and protection.

Requirements for Opening an Account in a Foreign Bank: What to Know in 2025

Illustration for the section "Requirements for Opening an Account in a Foreign Bank: What to Know in 2025" in the article "How to Open a Bank Account in a Foreign Bank for an International Company"

Documents for Opening an Account for a Legal Entity

The standard document package includes:

  • Incorporation documents: charter, certificate of registration, extract from the register (Certificate of Incorporation, Articles of Association, Certificate of Good Standing).
  • Documents of beneficiaries and directors – passports, address verification, resumes, sometimes, recommendation letters.
  • Business plan and proof of business reality – contracts, invoices, website, social media, business model description.
  • Financial statements, balance sheet, income statement, tax returns.
  • Legal address and substance requirements: confirmation of the presence of an office, employees, operational activity in the chosen jurisdiction.
Important: requirements vary greatly by country and bank. For example, in Singapore, a local director and legal address are mandatory, while in Germany a detailed business plan and proof of economic presence are required. COREDO’s team always prepares clients for the fact that the bank may request additional documents or conduct an interview with the management.

Beneficiary Verification and KYC: Modern Bank Requirements

Know Your Customer (KYC) and verification of beneficial owners are key stages. Banks use automated systems to screen against sanctions lists, check sources of funds, and assess reputational risks. Increasingly, e-KYC – digital identification and remote verification – is being applied.
Special attention to the ownership structure. Complex schemes with nominees, offshore companies, or opaque ownership chains are almost certain to lead to rejection. Banks expect a clear understanding of who actually controls the business and the willingness to provide supporting documents (e.g., trust declarations, shareholder agreements).

Economic Substance and Substance Requirements

The requirements for economic presence (substance requirements) are tightening worldwide. Banks and regulators want to see a real business: office, employees, operations, tax residency. “Paper” companies without substance face refusals or account blocks.

For example, in Singapore, having a local director and a registered address is mandatory for company registration. In the EU, confirmation of actual activity through contracts, payments, financial reporting.
COREDO’s practice confirms: preparation for a substance check is not a formality but a part of the company’s long-term strategy.

Step-by-Step Guide: How to Open a Corporate Account Abroad

Illustration for the section "Step-by-Step Guide: How to Open a Corporate Account Abroad" in the article "How to Open a Bank Account in a Foreign Bank for an International Company"

Choosing a Jurisdiction and Bank for an International Company

Choosing a jurisdiction: the first and most important step. You need to consider:

  • Country and bank reputation: affects partners’ trust and access to financing.
  • Substance requirements, where it is easier to confirm the reality of the business.
  • Tax regime – rates, double taxation avoidance agreements, CRS/FATCA participation.
  • Loyalty to non-residents: in which countries it is easier to open an account for foreign owners.
  • Licenses available for fintech, crypto, payment services.
COREDO’s team recommends starting with an analysis of the business model and long-term goals. For example, for an IT startup with global ambitions, Estonia or Singapore will be suitable, for a holding, Cyprus or the UAE, for e-commerce, EU payment institutions.

Preparation and Submission of Documents: Nuances for the EU, Asia, Africa

The account opening process usually includes:

  1. Selecting a bank and preliminary screening: evaluating the chances of success, preparing pre-approval.
  2. Collecting and preparing documents: translation, apostille, notarization, preparation of explanatory letters.
  3. Submitting the application, online or through a registration agent.
  4. Undergoing an interview – in person or via video call, questions about the business, sources of funds, plans.
  5. Making the minimum deposit – from $1,000 to $50,000 depending on the bank and country.
  6. Account activation and service connection – internet banking, corporate cards, API integration.
In Singapore, for example, the company registration process takes 1-3 days after documents are submitted to ACRA, and account opening, another 1-2 weeks. In the EU, the timeline may be longer due to stricter compliance.

Passing Compliance Checks and AML Business Support

AML (Anti-Money Laundering) and compliance: critically important stages. Banks check:

  • Sources of funds – the origin of capital, the legality of operations.
  • Business model – compliance with the declared activity, money laundering risks.
  • Ownership structure – transparency, absence of PEP (politically exposed persons), sanctions risks.
  • Transaction history: if the company was already operating, the bank will request statements from old accounts.
COREDO’s practice shows: preparation for a compliance check is not only about collecting documents but also preparing scenarios for answers to potential bank questions. Sometimes the assistance of an independent compliance officer or outsourcing AML support helps.

Remote Account Opening for Legal Entities: Pros and Cons

Remote account opening is a trend in recent years. Many banks and EMIs (electronic money institutions) offer a fully remote process with e-KYC and digital signature.

Pros – speed, convenience, availability for non-residents.
Cons: higher risks of refusal, less personalized support, sometimes limited account functionality. For complex cases (holdings, fintech, high-risk businesses), personal presence or working through a trusted partner is still required.
The solution developed at COREDO is to combine remote and in-person stages to maximize the chances of success.

Main Risks and Challenges of Opening an Account in a Foreign Bank

Illustration for the section "Main Risks and Challenges of Opening an Account in a Foreign Bank" in the article "How to Open a Bank Account in a Foreign Bank for an International Company"

Reasons for Refusal and How to Minimize Them

The most common reasons for refusal:

  • Opaque ownership structure – complex schemes, nominees, offshore.
  • Lack of substance: “paper” company without real activity.
  • Reputational risks – links with sanctioned individuals, countries, sectors.
  • Insufficient documentation, lack of contracts, reporting, address confirmation.
  • High-risk business model – crypto, gambling, adult, without a license.

How to minimize the risks:

  • Prepare a complete set of documents: the more detailed, the better.
  • Work out the ownership structure: minimal intermediaries, maximum transparency.
  • Confirm the reality of the business – website, social media, contracts, payments.
  • Bring in a professional consultant to prepare for due diligence and support at all stages.

Specifics for Offshore and Onshore Companies

Offshore companies face the most difficulties: many banks in the EU and Asia do not work with offshore or require enhanced due diligence. Onshore companies (EU, Singapore, UAE) have better chances, but it is still important to confirm substance and transaction transparency.
COREDO’s practice confirms: even for offshore structures, it is possible to find a banking solution if documents are prepared competently and the correct jurisdiction is chosen. However, in the long term, moving to an onshore model is a more sustainable solution.

Transaction Limits and Currency Control

After opening an account, it is important to understand the limitations:

  • Operational limits, by amount, currency, payment purpose.
  • Transaction monitoring, banks automatically track suspicious transactions, and may request explanations.
  • Currency control – in some countries (e.g., China, India) there are strict controls on capital withdrawal.
  • Fees – for opening, maintenance, transfers, conversion. For non-residents, tariffs are often higher.
Managing these risks is part of the comprehensive banking support that the COREDO team offers its clients.

Comparison of Popular Jurisdictions and Banks for Opening a Corporate Account

Table Comparing Account Opening Conditions in the EU, Asia, Africa

Jurisdiction Opening Timeframes Substance Requirements Minimum Deposit Loyalty to Non-Residents Compliance Features
Germany 2-4 weeks High €10,000 Medium Strict AML/KYC, interview
Singapore 1-3 weeks Medium $5,000 High Fast e-KYC, local director
UAE (Dubai) 1-2 weeks Medium $10,000 High Flexible requirements, no tax
Hong Kong 2-6 weeks High $1,000 Medium Careful due diligence
Cyprus 1-2 weeks Medium €1,000 High Lenient compliance, EU standards

Alternatives to Traditional Banks: EMI, PSP, Fintech Solutions

For some businesses (IT, e-commerce, fintech), traditional banks are not the only option. Electronic Money Institutions (EMI), Payment Service Providers (PSP), and neobanks offer:

  • Fast account opening: sometimes in 1-2 days.
  • Flexible fees – lower fees, multi-currency options.
  • Integration with payment systems: acquiring, gateways, API.
  • Specialization for niche businesses, crypto, SaaS, marketplaces.
But such solutions also have drawbacks: limited banking license, lower deposit protection, sometimes issues with conversion and fund transfers. The COREDO team always analyzes the risks and benefits of each option for the client’s specific task.

Practical Steps and Recommendations for Successful Account Opening

How to Prepare Your Business and Documents for Due Diligence

  • Gather a complete set of corporate documents, charter, protocols, certificates, extracts.
  • Prepare proof of business reality, contracts, invoices, website, social media.
  • Work out the ownership structure, minimize chains, ensure transparency of beneficiaries.
  • Prepare financial statements, balance sheet, P&L, tax returns.
  • Ensure substance, office, employees, operations in the chosen jurisdiction.
  • Conduct preliminary screening: check founders and beneficiaries against sanctions lists, PEP databases.

Selecting a Consulting Partner and Legal Support

Opening an account abroad is a complex process where every detail matters. Professional support is not a luxury but a necessity. The COREDO team offers:

  • Business model analysis and jurisdiction selection: considering tax, regulatory, and reputational risks.
  • Document preparation and due diligence passage: from document collection to bank interviews.
  • AML support and compliance: assistance with building internal processes, staff training.
  • Turnkey account opening, from bank selection to connecting all services.
  • Post-opening support – assistance with reporting, audit, operation optimization.
Our experience at COREDO shows: even in the most complex cases (offshores, high-risk businesses, complex structures) a solution can be found if approached systematically and professionally.

Key Takeaways and Actionable Advice for Entrepreneurs

Opening a bank account abroad for an international company in 2025 is an achievable task, but it requires deep expertise, preparation, and a strategic approach.
Here are the key recommendations that the COREDO team gives to its clients:

  • Choose your jurisdiction wisely: don’t chase “cheapness”, assess reputation, substance requirements, tax implications.
  • Prepare for due diligence: transparency, documentation, proof of business reality do more than connections or intermediaries.
  • Do not skimp on professional support – mistakes at the account opening stage can cost months of waiting and thousands of euros in lost profit.
  • Build long-term relationships with the bank – regular operations, reporting, AML compliance reduce the risk of account blocking.
  • Consider alternatives to traditional banks – EMI, PSP, fintech solutions may be optimal for niche businesses.
  • Plan for structural development – as the business grows, possible transition to more reputable jurisdictions, opening accounts in multiple countries, optimizing taxes and cash flow.
COREDO: your reliable partner in international corporate structuring, account opening, licensing, and comprehensive business support. We know how to make the process as transparent, fast, and safe as possible because we have been through this path hundreds of times with our clients from Europe, Asia, and the CIS.
If you are ready to take your business to the next level – let’s discuss your needs. Together we will find the optimal solution that will work for years to come.

“`

In 2024, the share of stablecoins in the total volume of cryptocurrency transactions in Europe exceeded 58%. However, from July 1, 2025, the world’s largest stablecoin: USDT from Tether Limited: will be banned from trading on European exchanges and in transactions between companies. For many entrepreneurs and financial directors, this is not just news, but a challenge that could change the structure of international settlements, approaches to liquidity management, and even investment strategy. Why has the USDT ban in the EU become a reality, how are the new MiCA Regulation rules radically changing the market, and what steps should businesses take to maintain their competitive advantage?

Today, companies are faced not only with the need to quickly adapt to new requirements but also with building long-term compliance strategies amidst growing regulatory pressure, tightening AML compliance, and the emergence of central bank digital currencies. How can financial transparency, regulatory risk minimization, and efficiency in international settlements be ensured? Answers to these questions require not only a deep understanding of the market but also practical experience in implementing solutions across different jurisdictions.

In this article, I will explore in detail the reasons and consequences of the USDT ban in Europe, discuss how the COREDO team is helping clients prepare for the new rules, what alternatives are available to businesses, and which legal and compliance solutions truly work in practice. If you want not just to survive in the era of MiCA but to effectively scale your business, read to the end. Here you will find not only analysis but also specific recommendations, tested on real cases.

Reasons for the USDT Ban in the EU: MiCA Regulation of Cryptocurrencies and Tether Restrictions

How MiCA Changes the Rules for Stablecoins

The introduction of the MiCA Regulation (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) marked a turning point for the European cryptocurrency market. This regulatory act for the first time established clear requirements for the issuance, circulation, and control of stablecoins, including parameters such as reserve transparency, audit, issuer responsibility, and mandatory compliance procedures.

Now any stablecoin used in the EU must meet strict criteria:

  • Full disclosure of reserves and liquidity guarantee mechanisms.
  • Regular independent audit.
  • Transparent AML/KYC procedures and AML process automation.
  • Compliance with capital and risk management requirements.
COREDO’s practice confirms: for companies focused on international settlements, these changes mean the need to review not only tools but also the entire policy of financial monitoring and corporate management of crypto assets.

Why Tether (USDT) Does Not Meet New Requirements

The main reason why USDT has become illegal in Europe is its non-compliance with MiCA standards for transparency and reserve management. Despite its scale and liquidity, Tether Limited does not provide a sufficient level of openness about the stablecoin’s backing structure, and independent audits are not always available in real-time. This creates risks for corporate clients related to possible asset freeze, liquidity reduction, and even suspicions of financial fraud.

Our experience at COREDO showed that many companies using USDT for cross-border transfers faced difficulties with financial due diligence and passing banking compliance procedures. As a result, using USDT is now associated with high regulatory risks and can lead to the blocking or confiscation of digital assets.

The Role of AML Compliance and Anti-Money Laundering

One of the key factors influencing the USDT ban was the tightened control over AML (Anti-Money Laundering) and the fight against money laundering through stablecoins. European regulators require not only blockchain transparency but also full traceability of operations, automation of KYC/AML, and the implementation of corporate risk management policies. Solutions developed in COREDO allow companies to integrate automated AML procedures and ensure compliance with new standards, which becomes a mandatory condition for working with any digital assets in the EU.

Consequences of the USDT Ban for Business and the European Crypto Market

Illustration for the section "Consequences of the USDT Ban for Business and the European Crypto Market" in the article "Why USDT is banned in the EU"

The Delisting of USDT on European Cryptocurrencies: How It Happens

From 2025, the largest cryptocurrency exchanges in Europe started a phased delisting of USDT, automatic conversion of balances into alternative stablecoins (such as USDC or euro-stablecoins), and a temporary freeze of funds until compliance procedures are completed. In several cases, the COREDO team assisted clients in transitioning to new tools, helping to minimize liquidity losses and avoid the blocking of corporate wallets.

Impact on International Transfers and Corporate Settlements

For many companies, the USDT ban became a challenge: traditional P2P cryptocurrency exchange schemes and cross-border transfers in stablecoins were put at risk. COREDO’s practice showed that timely transition to MiCA compliant stablecoins allows maintaining the speed and transparency of settlements, as well as reducing risks associated with corporate management of crypto assets.

How the USDT Ban Affects the P2P Market and Alternative Schemes

The P2P market in Europe is undergoing significant transformation: USDT delisting has led to liquidity reduction, fee increases, and the emergence of new settlement schemes using the digital euro and other compliant-stablecoins. COREDO’s solutions for integrating blockchain solutions allow companies to quickly adapt to new conditions and ensure the financial security of the business even under restrictions.

Legal Consequences of Holding USDT in the EU After the Ban

Holding USDT after the ban takes effect can lead to serious legal consequences: from fines and sanctions to confiscation of digital assets at the request of regulators. At COREDO, we recommend conducting a corporate wallet audit, timely replacing USDT with MiCA compliant stablecoins, and updating compliance strategies to minimize risks.

Alternatives to USDT in Europe: What Businesses Should Choose After the Ban

Illustration for the section "Alternatives to USDT in Europe: What Businesses Should Choose After the Ban" in the article "Why USDT is banned in the EU"

Comparison of Stablecoins: USDC, DAI, Digital Euro

Stablecoin MiCA Compliance Reserve Transparency Availability in the EU Fees Issuer
USDC Yes High High Medium Circle
DAI Partially Decentralized High Medium MakerDAO
Digital Euro Yes Maximum In progress Low ECB
USDT No Low Limited Medium Tether Limited

USDC from Circle and the digital euro being introduced by the ECB are becoming the main alternatives for settlements and liquidity storage. DAI, as a decentralized stablecoin, partially meets MiCA but requires separate risk assessments and compliance procedures.

How to Prepare a Company for Transitioning to New Stablecoins

Transitioning to compliant-stablecoins requires not only technical migration but also revisiting corporate policies, automating KYC/AML, and integrating new blockchain solutions. COREDO’s experience shows: timely preparation, staff training, and updating internal procedures can minimize costs and ensure a seamless transition to new tools.

Implementation of Digital Euro and the Impact of CBDC on the Stablecoin Market

The introduction of CBDC (Central Bank Digital Currency) – digital euro – forms a new infrastructure for corporate settlements, reducing fees, and increasing financial transparency. COREDO’s solutions for integrating CBDC into corporate processes allow businesses not only to meet new requirements but also to leverage the advantages of digital currencies for scaling businesses.

AML Compliance and Legal Support for Cryptocurrency Transactions in New Conditions

Illustration for the section "AML Compliance and Legal Support for Cryptocurrency Transactions in New Conditions" in the article "Why USDT is banned in the EU"

How AML and KYC Procedures for Crypto Companies Will Change

With the MiCA Regulation coming into force, AML and KYC requirements are significantly tightened: now every crypto asset transaction must be accompanied by automated monitoring, financial due diligence, and cryptocurrency reporting. COREDO’s practice shows that integrating modern compliance solutions not only reduces operational risks but also boosts trust from banks and investors.

Registration and Licensing of Crypto Companies in the EU After the USDT Ban

Registration of crypto companies and Licensing of services in the EU is now impossible without full compliance with the new MiCA standards, including information disclosure on beneficiaries, the introduction of compliance officers, and automation of AML processes. The COREDO team has implemented dozens of successful cases of registration and licensing of cryptocurrency services in the Czech Republic, Estonia, Slovakia, and Cyprus, helping clients navigate all due diligence stages and obtain necessary permits.

Practical Recommendations for Legal Support and Risk Minimization

To minimize risks, it is important not only to implement automated compliance strategies but also to regularly conduct an audit of corporate policies, update contracts with counterparties, and train staff on new requirements. COREDO’s solutions in the field of legal support allow companies to protect investors’ interests, ensure financial transparency, and minimize tax and regulatory risks.

Key Conclusions and Practical Steps for Business

  • Conduct an audit of current crypto assets and assess the risks of holding USDT.
  • Prepare for the transition to MiCA compliant stablecoins (USDC, DAI, digital euro).
  • Review and automate AML/KYC procedures, implement modern compliance solutions.
  • Update corporate policies on crypto asset management and integrate blockchain solutions.
  • Conduct staff training and consult COREDO experts on new EU requirements.
  • Review contracts with counterparties, considering new regulatory restrictions.
  • Prepare cryptocurrency reporting and ensure financial transparency.

FAQ – Answers to Key Questions from Entrepreneurs and Managers

How will the USDT ban in the EU affect my company if we use stablecoins for settlements?
The ban will necessitate a transition to compliant stablecoins. Lack of timely migration may lead to blocked funds and sanctions.
Which alternatives to USDT are the safest for businesses in Europe?
USDC and digital euro, are most compliant with MiCA and ensure maximum transparency, DAI requires separate risk assessments.
How to ensure compliance with the new MiCA requirements when working with cryptocurrencies?
Implement automated AML/KYC procedures, conduct a corporate policy audit, and use only licensed services.
What risks does storing USDT on corporate wallets pose after the ban?
Risks include fund freezing, fines, asset confiscation, and loss of liquidity access.
How will the cost and speed of international transfers change after the USDT delisting?
Transition to compliant stablecoins and digital euro may reduce fees and increase transparency, but will require process adaptation.
What threatens companies for storing USDT in the EU after the ban?
Legal consequences: from fines to criminal liability and asset confiscation.
How will AML and KYC procedures for crypto companies change in the EU?
Financial monitoring, process automation, and mandatory reporting on all operations will be strengthened.

Prospects for Cryptocurrency Regulation: Experience from the EU, Asia, and Africa

Comparison of Stablecoin Regulation Approaches in the EU, Asia, and Africa

The EU’s experience with MiCA implementation has become a benchmark for several Asian and African countries. In Singapore and Japan, requirements for crypto company licensing are also being tightened, financial due diligence and AML process automation are being introduced. In Africa, there is a growing interest in DeFi regulation and the integration of blockchain solutions into corporate processes.
The COREDO team regularly supports projects on company registration and licensing of cryptocurrency services in Singapore, Dubai, the United Kingdom, and other jurisdictions, helping clients adhere to international standards and minimize regulatory risks.

Long-term Consequences for the Cryptocurrency Market and Investment Attractiveness

The USDT ban and MiCA implementation will lead to increased investment attractiveness of compliant stablecoins, improved market transparency, and reduced risks of financial fraud. However, the liquidity structure on European crypto exchanges will change, and companies unprepared for new requirements will face restricted market access and sanctions.

COREDO’s practice shows: timely adaptation to new rules, implementation of automated compliance solutions, and integration of blockchain technologies are key factors for long-term success in the international digital asset market.
In 2024, the volume of cryptocurrency transactions in EU countries exceeded 1.3 trillion euros, with more than 7% of this turnover attributed to Slovakia. However, only 18% of companies, according to the European Banking Authority, are confident in their ability to comply with new AML and financial monitoring requirements. Why is such a dynamically growing market facing such serious barriers? How to ensure the legalization of cryptocurrency in Slovakia without losing business flexibility and avoiding account blockage?
Today’s cryptocurrency regulation in Slovakia is not just a set of laws, but a strategic tool for protecting investors, fostering innovation, and entering international markets. But these opportunities also come with serious challenges: from licensing complexities to the nuances of taxation and banking services. In this article, I will discuss how the regulatory system works in practice, what requirements are imposed on crypto businesses, and why Slovakia is becoming a focal point for international projects. If you want to understand how to effectively start or scale a cryptocurrency business in the EU – read to the end. Here you will find not only a legislative analysis but also practical recommendations based on the experience of the COREDO team.

Laws on Cryptocurrency in Slovakia: Basics of Regulation and Legal Status

Illustration to the section "Laws on Cryptocurrency in Slovakia: Basics of Regulation and Legal Status" in the article "Cryptocurrency Regulation in Slovakia"

Slovakia recognizes cryptocurrency as a special type of virtual asset, which is not a legal tender but is permitted for circulation and taxation. This approach aligns with European directives on cryptocurrencies and FATF recommendations, ensuring harmonization of regulation with other EU countries. Slovakia views virtual assets as property, operations with which are subject to accounting and reporting, and digital wallets and their regulation are part of a comprehensive system for controlling the origin of funds.
COREDO’s practice shows that for clients launching a cryptocurrency business in Slovakia, understanding the status of tokens, NFTs, and other digital assets is crucial—their legal qualification affects licensing, taxation, and compliance requirements.

Main Legislative Acts and Their Impact on Crypto Business

Three key laws form the basis of cryptocurrency regulation in Slovakia:
  • Corporate Income Tax Law in Slovakia, which sets the rules for taxing income from virtual asset operations.
  • Accounting Law for Cryptocurrency Companies – establishes requirements for financial reporting and audit of operations.
  • Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Law, which implements FATF recommendations and European directives, including mandatory KYC procedures for crypto exchanges and wallet providers.
A solution developed by COREDO for one of the international crypto exchanges included the integration of automated financial monitoring systems, which not only met the Slovak Ministry of Finance requirements but also increased trust from banks and investors.

Cryptocurrency Licenses in Slovakia: Types of Licenses and Requirements

Illustration to the section "Cryptocurrency Licenses in Slovakia: Types of Licenses and Requirements" in the article "Cryptocurrency Regulation in Slovakia"

There are two main categories of licenses for crypto businesses in Slovakia:
  • Cryptocurrency Exchange Licenses: required for companies that conduct exchanges of digital assets for fiat money and vice versa.
  • Cryptocurrency Storage Licenses – required for virtual wallet providers and custodial services.
For both categories, the following are mandatory:
  • Appointment of a compliance officer with experience in AML.
  • Implementation of KYC procedures for crypto exchanges, including customer identification and verification.
  • Description of business model, management structure, and beneficiary transparency.
Our experience at COREDO showed that for successful licensing, it’s important to prepare internal policies in advance for due diligence of crypto business clients and automation of monitoring processes.

Step-by-Step Guide for Obtaining a Cryptocurrency License for Foreign and Local Companies

  1. Choose the legal form and prepare the founding documents.
  2. Collect a package of documents: charter, information about beneficiaries, business plan, AML policy, confirmation of the management’s business reputation.
  3. Submit the application to the Financial Administration of the Slovak Republic.
  4. Check for compliance with requirements: transparency of the crypto business management structure, presence of compliance officer, implemented KYC/AML procedures.
  5. Receive the license and register in the relevant state registers.
The COREDO team has implemented projects where, for foreign companies, a step-by-step roadmap was built: from choosing the structure to integrating automated systems for fund source control.

AML/CTF Compliance and Financial Monitoring in the Cryptocurrency Business in Slovakia

Illustration to the section "AML/CTF Compliance and Financial Monitoring in the Cryptocurrency Business in Slovakia" in the article "Cryptocurrency Regulation in Slovakia"

Slovakia requires full AML compliance from cryptocurrency companies, including:
  • Mandatory KYC procedures for crypto exchanges.
  • Maintaining a registry of transactions with virtual assets.
  • Financial monitoring of operations and automation of compliance processes.
COREDO’s practice confirms that automating due diligence and implementing fund source control tools minimizes risks and expedites business scaling. For one client, we integrated a solution that met international FATF standards and European directives, ensuring resistance to financial fraud and increasing bank loyalty.

Fines and Sanctions for Non-Compliance with AML/CTF Requirements

Fines for non-compliance with AML/CTF standards in Slovakia can reach 1 million euros and, in some cases, lead to license revocation and account blocking. The Financial Administration of the Slovak Republic actively uses financial monitoring tools for operations and audits of cryptocurrency operations to identify violations.
COREDO’s recommendation: regular internal auditing and staff training are key to resilience against financial fraud and maintaining your license.

Taxation and Financial Reporting for Cryptocurrency Companies in Slovakia

Illustration to the section "Taxation and Financial Reporting for Cryptocurrency Companies in Slovakia" in the article "Cryptocurrency Regulation in Slovakia"

Income from cryptocurrency operations in Slovakia is subject to corporate income tax at a rate of 21% for legal entities. The Slovak Corporate Income Tax Law requires all cryptocurrency transactions to be recorded in accounting and reporting on transactions with virtual assets to be provided.
A COREDO project on integrating cryptocurrencies into corporate finance demonstrated that correct classification of income and expenses allows for optimizing the tax burden and avoiding claims from tax authorities.

Financial Reporting and Transparency of Management Structure

Financial reporting for crypto companies in Slovakia must comply with EU standards and include:
  • Disclosure of information about beneficial owners.
  • Audit of cryptocurrency operations.
  • Transparency of the management structure of the crypto business.
For COREDO clients, we implement procedures to ensure transparency and reliability of corporate governance, which is critically important for attracting investors and passing due diligence.

Banking Services and Cryptocurrency Integration

Illustration to the section "Banking Services and Cryptocurrency Integration" in the article "Cryptocurrency Regulation in Slovakia"

Banking services for crypto businesses in Slovakia come with several restrictions:
  • Not all banks open accounts for cryptocurrency companies due to financial monitoring operation risks.
  • Delays are possible with international payments in cryptocurrency.
  • Full compliance with AML/CTF standards and transparency of fund sources is required.
Risk management developed by COREDO for clients includes preliminary business process auditing and preparation of document packages confirming the legality of fund sources.

Practical Aspects of Cryptocurrency Settlements and International Payments

Features of cryptocurrency settlements in Slovakia include:
  • The need to integrate cryptocurrencies into corporate finance through legal payment gateways.
  • Compliance with security standards for crypto exchanges and custodial services.
  • Maintaining reporting on international cryptocurrency payments considering EU requirements.
A COREDO solution for one client allowed automating compliance processes and simplifying interaction with banks, accelerating international settlements and reducing operational risks.

Advantages of Registering a Crypto Business in Slovakia

Slovakia offers several strategic advantages:
  • Transparent and predictable cryptocurrency regulation in Slovakia, aligning with international cryptocurrency regulation standards and FATF recommendations.
  • Openness to foreign investors and flexible licensing conditions for cryptocurrency companies.
  • Low entry threshold for startups and innovative projects.
COREDO’s case: for a European fintech company, registering a crypto business in Slovakia allowed entry into EU markets, reduced administrative costs, and simplified the licensing procedure.

Key Risks, Implementation Challenges, and Long-term Consequences of Legislative Changes

Main risks for businesses when working with cryptocurrency in Slovakia:
  • Frequent legislative changes and tightening requirements for corporate governance in the crypto sphere.
  • Legal risks for investors related to the classification of tokens and virtual assets.
  • Scaling risks for crypto companies due to banking service restrictions and the need for constant compliance process updates.
The COREDO team’s recommendation: regular monitoring of legislative changes and flexible adaptation of internal policies can minimize long-term consequences for investors and crypto business owners.

Practical Steps and Recommendations for Launching and Scaling a Cryptocurrency Business in Slovakia

  • Conduct comprehensive due diligence of crypto business clients and implement compliance process automation.
  • Ensure transparency of the crypto business management structure and disclosure of beneficiary information.
  • Adhere to international FATF standards when launching a crypto business in Slovakia, integrating fund source control and fraud prevention.
  • Engage with regulators and financial authorities at early stages, using best practices developed by COREDO.
  • Regularly update internal policies and train staff on new AML/CTF requirements.
For a COREDO client, we implemented a project to scale a cryptocurrency business under Slovak regulation: compliance process automation and audit tool integration reduced costs by 30% and expedited entry into new EU markets.

Key Conclusions and Recommendations for Entrepreneurs and Investors

  • Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovakia creates unique opportunities for business scaling but requires a deep understanding of legislation and compliance.
  • The cryptocurrency business in Slovakia benefits from transparency, flexible licensing, and integration of international standards.
  • Compliance of Slovak cryptocurrency companies: a key to sustainability and long-term success: automation, audit, transparency of beneficiaries, and regular interaction with regulators become market standards.
  • Integration of cryptocurrencies into corporate finance and tax load optimization is only possible with accurate financial reporting and compliance with security standards for crypto exchanges.
COREDO’s practice proves that a strategic approach to launching and developing a crypto business in Slovakia allows not only minimizing legal and financial risks but also creating a solid foundation for growth in a rapidly changing digital asset market.

Introduction: The Importance of Proper Drafting of International Contracts

Illustration for the section "Introduction: The Importance of Proper Drafting of International Contracts" in the article "How to Properly Draft Contracts in International Deals"

Did you know that up to 70% of international deals face legal challenges already at the contract drafting stage? This is not just a statistic; it’s a daily reality for entrepreneurs entering the markets of Europe, Asia, and the CIS. One incorrect clause, an overlooked license, or a wrongly chosen jurisdiction — and the deal can turn into multimillion-dollar losses, legal battles, or even business blockage.
At Coredo, we see companies striving for globalization often underestimate the risks associated with drafting international contracts. Meanwhile, competent legal support is not just a formality, but a foundation for scaling the business, protecting assets, and minimizing tax and regulatory risks. This is why I decided to share a practical guide based on our experience in supporting hundreds of deals in the EU, UK, Singapore, Cyprus, Estonia, Czech Republic, Slovakia, the UAE, and other jurisdictions.
If you want to not only avoid common mistakes but also gain a competitive edge through transparent, secure, and efficient international contracts, this article is for you. Here, you’ll find not just theory but also concrete steps, case studies from COREDO’s practice, and strategic recommendations to help your business confidently operate on the international stage.

International Contracts and Deal Drafting: Basic Concepts and Legal Foundations

Illustration for the section "International Contracts and Deal Drafting: Basic Concepts and Legal Foundations" in the article "How to Properly Draft Contracts in International Deals"

Types of International Contracts and Agreements

International contracts form the basis of any cross-border activity. They regulate relationships between companies from different countries, establish the rights and obligations of parties, and set the procedure for dispute resolution. In COREDO’s practice, we most frequently encounter the following types of agreements:
  • Sale and Purchase Agreements – for the supply of goods and services between residents of different countries.
  • Licensing and Franchising Agreements, for the transfer of technologies, brands, and business models.
  • Investment Agreements – for capital raising and joint projects.
  • Agency and Distribution Agreements, for entering new markets through local partners.
  • Joint Venture (JV) Agreements, for creating alliances and joint enterprises.
Each of these types requires a special approach to structure, wording, and drafting procedure. For instance, when registering a company in the UK or Cyprus, not only the contract itself but also accompanying documents such as the charter, memorandum of association, address confirmation, and, in some cases, licenses and regulatory approvals are critical. The COREDO team always emphasizes that there are no universal templates; every contract must be tailored to the business specifics and the requirements of the particular jurisdiction.

Main Stages of International Deal Drafting

Drafting international deals is a multi-step process that starts with partner selection and ends with the fulfillment of obligations. Our experience shows that the following stages are the most critical:
  • Preliminary Negotiations and Due Diligence, counterparty check, analysis of their financial status, reputation, and regulatory compliance.
  • Condition Alignment – defining the contract’s subject, price, timeline, guarantees, calculation procedure, and party responsibilities.
  • Document Preparation and Para-signing – drafting the agreement, discussing it, and preliminarily signing (or para-signing) it.
  • Final Signing and Entry into Force: signing the final version, sometimes involving a notary or state registration.
  • Fulfillment and Support – monitoring compliance with terms, resolving arising disputes, and making amendments.
At each stage, there can be legal, tax, and regulatory risks. For example, when registering a company in the UK, it’s essential not only to properly draft founding documents but also to register with tax authorities, obtain necessary licenses, and comply with AML (Anti-Money Laundering) requirements. COREDO’s practice confirms that transparency and detailed elaboration at each stage are the keys to successful international deals.

Structure and Content of International Contracts: Key Elements

Illustration for the section "Structure and Content of International Contracts: Key Elements" in the article "How to Properly Draft Contracts in International Deals"

Title, Preamble, Main and Final Parts

The structure of an international contract is not merely a formality but a tool for minimizing risks and enhancing the legal strength of the document. At COREDO, we recommend adhering to the following scheme:
Contract Element Description and Function
Title Name, parties, contract subject, date, and place of signing
Preamble Goals, principles, references to international law norms, and conclusions basis
Main Part Rights, obligations, execution conditions, calculation procedure, guarantees, and liability
Final Part Entry into force, termination, language, signatures, dispute resolution procedure
Appendices Protocols, rules, exchange letters, additional agreements
For instance, when drafting a sale and purchase agreement between an EU company and an Asian partner, it’s crucial to state not just the parties but also the applicable law and the dispute resolution mechanism (arbitration, court) in the preamble. In the main part, detail the supply terms, Incoterms, timelines, payment procedures, and quality guarantees. In the final part, determine when the contract comes into force, termination conditions, and the communication language.

Specific Wording and Legal Techniques

Legal techniques for drafting international contracts require special attention to wording. Ambiguous or overly general terms can lead to disputes and litigation. At COREDO, we always recommend:
  • Using clear, unambiguous terms, avoiding ambiguities.
  • Specifying the applicable law and jurisdiction for dispute resolution.
  • Detailing the amendment mechanism and notification procedures.
  • Including confidentiality and personal data protection clauses, especially in light of GDPR and other international standards.
For example, when drafting a licensing agreement for software use between a Singapore company and a European partner, it’s essential to not only define the scope of rights but also to foresee the audit procedure, termination conditions of the license, and liability for copyright infringement.

Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and International Standards of Drafting

Illustration for the section "Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties and International Standards of Drafting" in the article "How to Properly Draft Contracts in International Deals"

Key Provisions of the Vienna Convention

The 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties is a fundamental document regulating the conclusion, execution, and termination of international contracts. Although originally developed for interstate relations, many of its principles apply in commercial practice, especially when resolving disputes in international arbitration.
Key provisions of the Convention to consider in drafting international deals:
  • Freedom of Contract: parties have the right to determine the agreement’s terms independently, provided they do not contradict imperative norms of international law.
  • Good Faith: parties must act in good faith in executing the contract.
  • Conclusion Procedure: a contract is considered concluded from the moment consent is expressed to be bound by its terms.
  • Contract Invalidity: a contract may be deemed invalid in cases of mistake, fraud, bribery, or coercion.
In COREDO’s practice, we often encounter situations where parties overlook these principles, leading to serious legal consequences. For example, an attempt to circumvent tax or regulatory requirements of one jurisdiction can result in a contract being deemed invalid and significant financial losses.

Procedures for Signing, Para-signing, Approval, and Ratification

The procedure for concluding international agreements can include several stages:
  • Para-signing, preliminary signing of the document by the initials of authorized persons, confirming agreement with the text but not obliging execution.
  • Conditional Signing, signing with a reservation for subsequent approval, like by a board of directors or a regulator.
  • Final Signing, signing the final version of the document, after which it comes into effect.
  • Approval and Ratification, in some cases (especially for government contracts or deals involving state-owned companies), additional approval by higher authorities or parliamentary ratification might be required.
In commercial practice, a simplified procedure usually prevails, such as exchanging signed documents through email or specialized electronic document management platforms. However, in certain jurisdictions (e.g., UK company registration or obtaining a financial license in Cyprus), the original document with a “wet” signature and sometimes an apostille or legalization is required.

Practical Aspects of Drafting Contracts in International Deals

Illustration for the section "Practical Aspects of Drafting Contracts in International Deals" in the article "How to Properly Draft Contracts in International Deals"

How to Properly Draft an International Sale and Purchase Agreement

An international sale and purchase agreement is one of the most common types of contracts in COREDO’s practice. Here are the key steps we recommend for entrepreneurs:
  1. Identify the Parties and Contract Subject – clearly specify names, details, and describe the product or service.
  2. Set Price and Payment Terms: state currency, payment terms, deferral conditions, and penalties for delay.
  3. Define Delivery Terms (Incoterms) – choose a suitable delivery basis (FOB, CIF, EXW, etc.) to minimize risks and expenses.
  4. Detail Guarantees and Liability – specify warranty periods, return procedures, conditions for compensation of damages.
  5. Specify Applicable Law and Dispute Resolution – choose jurisdiction, arbitration, or court for possible disagreements.
For example, when handling a deal between a European equipment supplier and an Asian buyer, the COREDO team always emphasizes the necessity of a detailed description of the product’s technical specifications, acceptance conditions, and dispute resolution through international arbitration.

Documents Needed for Signing and Registration of International Agreements

Signing and registration of international agreements typically require the following documents:
  • Company Foundation Documents – charter, registration certificate, registry extract.
  • Powers of Attorney: confirmation of the authority of individuals signing the contract.
  • Financial Statements – to confirm the counterparty’s solvency.
  • Licenses and Permits – if activities require licensing (e.g., financial, pharmaceutical, telecommunications).
  • Documents Confirming Compliance with AML Requirements – particularly relevant for deals involving financial institutions.
In some cases (e.g., UK company registration), additional requirements include address confirmation, business activity description, and tax authority registration. COREDO’s practice demonstrates that the absence of even one of these documents can result in delays or refusal to register the deal.

The Importance of Licenses, Permits, and Compliance with Customs/Currency Controls

Licenses and permits are crucial aspects of international deals, especially in regulated industries (finance, cryptocurrency, payment services, healthcare). For instance, providing payment services in the EU requires an EMI (Electronic Money Institution) license, and activities involving crypto-assets need registration with relevant regulatory bodies.
Additionally, international trade mandates compliance with customs and currency controls. For example, exporting goods from the EU to Asian countries requires export declaration, certificates of origin, and sometimes special permits. Violating these requirements can lead to cargo delays, fines, or even criminal liability.
The COREDO team always supports clients at all stages of obtaining licenses and permits, helping to minimize risks and accelerate market entry.

Risks and Legal Support for International Deals

Typical Errors and Risks in Drafting International Contracts

In COREDO’s practice, we regularly encounter typical mistakes entrepreneurs make when drafting international contracts:
  • Insufficient Counterparty Check: Collaboration with an unreliable partner can lead to non-fulfillment and financial losses.
  • Inaccurate Wording – ambiguous terms cause disputes and litigation.
  • Ignoring Regulatory Requirements, lacking necessary licenses, or violating AML norms can result in account blocking, fines, or criminal charges.
  • Not Considering Tax Implications, improper deal structuring can lead to double taxation or claims from tax authorities.
For instance, when supporting a business acquisition deal in the Czech Republic, the COREDO team discovered that the seller lacked necessary permits to operate, which could lead to the deal being deemed invalid and significant losses for the buyer.

Legal Proceedings and Dispute Resolution Methods

International disputes are a special category of cases requiring deep knowledge of private international law, arbitration procedures, and practice in enforcing decisions across different jurisdictions. At COREDO, we recommend pre-specifying the dispute resolution procedure in the contract, through international arbitration (e.g., ICC, LCIA, SIAC) or national courts.
Key aspects to consider:
  • Choice of Arbitration Institution and Venue: influences procedure, duration, and cost of the dispute resolution.
  • Language of Arbitration Proceedings – important to determine the language for negotiations and document creation.
  • Enforcement of Decisions, ensure the jurisdiction is a signatory of the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards.
COREDO’s practice confirms that a well-drafted arbitration clause is an effective tool for protecting business interests in international deals.

Modern Trends and Technologies in Drafting International Contracts

Simplified Procedures: Document Exchange, Electronic Signatures, LegalTech

Modern technologies are drastically changing the approach to drafting international contracts. At COREDO, we actively utilize platforms for electronic document management, electronic signatures (e-signature), and LegalTech solutions to automate routine processes.
  • Speed: A deal can be concluded within hours, even if parties are in different world parts.
  • Security: contemporary systems ensure data protection and document authenticity confirmation.
  • Transparency: all deal stages are recorded electronically, minimizing manipulation risks.
For example, when handling a deal between a Singapore company and an Estonian partner, the COREDO team organized contract signing via the DocuSign platform, saving parties time and avoiding the need for a physical meeting.

The Impact of Brexit and Other Geopolitical Factors on International Deals

Brexit significantly altered the rules for drafting deals between EU companies and the UK. Contract conclusions now require accounting for new customs, tax, and regulatory requirements. For example, goods delivery from the EU to the UK necessitates additional documents, customs duties, and compliance with new standards.
Additionally, geopolitical changes (sanctions, currency regulation changes, tightened AML requirements) require continuous monitoring and contractual practice adaptation. At COREDO, we constantly analyze current changes and swiftly inform clients of new risks and opportunities.

Scaling Business Abroad Using International Contracts

How to Use International Contracts to Enter New Markets

International contracts are not only a tool for one-off deals but also a foundation for business scaling. At COREDO, we help clients build long-term partnerships, create joint ventures, and open branches and subsidiaries in new jurisdictions.
  • Building a Network of Reliable Partners through agency, distribution, and franchising agreements.
  • Optimizing Tax and Legal Structure: considering the specifics of each jurisdiction.
  • Utilizing International Trade Agreements – to reduce customs barriers and expedite market entry.
For example, when supporting a European IT company’s entry into the UAE market, the COREDO team developed a joint venture structure with a local partner, allowing the client to quickly obtain necessary licenses and commence regional operations.

Legal Support and Choosing Reliable Partners

Successful business scaling abroad is impossible without professional legal support. At COREDO, we not only assist in drafting contracts but also support clients through all stages, from due diligence to dispute resolution and business process optimization.
  • Transparency, all work stages and potential risks are discussed openly.
  • Individual Approach, every decision is tailored to the business specifics and client goals.
  • Comprehensiveness: we support not only legal but also financial, tax, and regulatory aspects of the deal.

Key Conclusions and Practical Recommendations for Entrepreneurs

Checklist: How to Minimize Risks and Ensure Successful International Deals

Stage Recommendations
Partner Selection Conduct due diligence, check reputation, financial status, and AML compliance
Contract Preparation Use clear wording, specify applicable law, dispute resolution procedure
Registration and Licensing Ensure all necessary documents, licenses, and permits are in place
Obligation Execution Monitor condition compliance, react promptly to changes
Support Engage professional consultants to minimize risks and optimize processes

Where to Seek Support

If you plan to enter international markets, conduct complex deals, or obtain financial licenses, the COREDO team is ready to be your reliable partner. Our experience, expertise, and individualized approach will help you minimize risks, save time, and achieve your goals.

International contracts aren’t just paperwork. They’re the foundation of your global success. Entrust their drafting to professionals.
“`

The banking sector plays a key role in the sustainable development of the global economy by ensuring the stability of financial systems, protecting consumer interests, and supporting entrepreneurial activity. However, regulatory approaches vary depending on each country’s regional and economic characteristics as well as historical context.

In this article, we will examine the specifics of banking activity in several European countries — Liechtenstein, Belgium, the Netherlands, Norway, and Hungary — as well as in one of Africa’s largest economies, the Republic of South Africa. Particular attention will be given to how local legislation and regulatory bodies contribute to achieving transparency, stability, and trust in the financial sector.

The evolution of the banking system in Liechtenstein

The Principality of Liechtenstein benefits greatly from its highly advantageous location in the heart of Europe, which enables it to hold a prominent position in the financial services market. Banks in the country serve companies from many foreign states.

Key aspects of banking regulation

The mid-1990s marked a turning point for the Principality’s entire banking and financial system. The system underwent profound changes. For example, the Banking Act (1992/108) established the foundations for the operation of banks in Liechtenstein, setting out requirements for their activities and supervision. This legislation was complemented by the Banking Ordinance (1994/022), which refined regulatory norms and standards, enhancing the financial system’s transparency and stability.

In 1996, Liechtenstein adopted the Private International Law Act and amendments to the regulation of individuals and corporations. These developments reflected the Principality’s efforts in the mid-1990s to reform and modernise its legal system, including aspects related to the financial sector.

Additionally, the emergence of new technologies (such as the internet) and Liechtenstein’s accession to the European Economic Area (EEA) had a significant impact on the development and modernisation of the country’s banking sector. Liechtenstein abandoned its principle of information secrecy and data protection barriers, opting instead for unrestricted entry into the European market.

Over time, the prompt resolution of tax matters and cooperation with foreign states became a key priority.

Currently, the country is home to 16 banking institutions, primarily engaged in asset management. The international banking sector, particularly in fintech, has long demonstrated significant potential for growth. LGT Bank AG currently holds a leading position in the country.

Obtaining a licence to conduct banking activities in Liechtenstein is a mandatory requirement. An organisation can provide financial services only after obtaining the required licence. As of today, 16 banks in Liechtenstein hold the necessary licence. Five of these are subsidiaries of financial institutions based in Switzerland, Austria, and Luxembourg.

Regulation in the banking sector

The Currency Treaty with Switzerland, signed in 1980, plays a significant role for financial services companies in Liechtenstein.

Under this agreement, the Swiss franc was designated as the official legal tender of Liechtenstein. Additionally, the treaty outlines specific Swiss legal and administrative provisions that apply within the Principality. The Swiss National Bank has been appointed as the national bank of Liechtenstein, requiring certain financial intermediaries, such as investment firms and banks, to submit reports within specified deadlines to the Swiss National Bank.

However, the oversight and regulation of financial services licensed in Liechtenstein remain the responsibility of the local supervisory authority. The Currency Treaty is a bilateral agreement that is regularly updated and amended as necessary.

What are the advantages of registering financial companies in the Principality?

Like Norway and Iceland, Liechtenstein is a member of the European Economic Area (EEA), which provides access to the four economic freedoms:

  • free movement of capital,
  • free movement of services,
  • free movement of persons,
  • free movement of goods.

As a result, all European directives and regulations governing the banking sector, investment funds, undertakings for collective investment in transferable securities (UCITS), asset management, and other types of financial activities are applicable in Liechtenstein. This provides Liechtenstein with a significant advantage, offering a «European passport» to organisations operating in the financial market and their products. Entrepreneurs looking to register their financial company in Liechtenstein have the opportunity to enter the European market without obstacles.

Banking system in LiechtensteinHowever, Switzerland is not a member of the EEA. This necessitated adapting to the situation, introducing transitional periods, and adopting additional measures. The Vaduz Convention helped address many of these challenges.

Switzerland has partial access to the European financial services market through a series of bilateral agreements with the EU; however, this access is not as comprehensive as that of EEA members, including Liechtenstein. Swiss financial companies must rely on bilateral arrangements and establish subsidiaries in EU countries to fully provide their services.

Significantly earlier, in 1960, the European Free Trade Association (EFTA) Convention was signed, primarily regulating trade in goods. However, it underwent revision in 2001 under the Vaduz Convention. This revision was driven by the need to account for the evolving contractual relationship between Switzerland and the EU. The outcome of the revision was the alignment of treaty obligations between Switzerland and EFTA member states with those towards the EU.

The Vaduz Convention came into effect on 1 June 2002, alongside the implementation of seven bilateral agreements between the EU and Switzerland. The Vaduz Convention expanded and redefined its scope to include trade in services and investments.

How to obtain a financial licence

To engage in certain types of activities within Liechtenstein’s financial market, it is necessary to obtain the appropriate licences. Licences are required for the following areas:

  • payment services,
  • electronic money operations,
  • other types of financial activities.

The most comprehensive authorisation is a banking licence, which allows the holder to carry out all the above-mentioned activities without needing additional permits. However, company employees must possess the relevant education, knowledge, and preferably experience in the field.

Oversight of the banking sector in Belgium

The National Bank of Belgium is the primary regulatory authority overseeing the activities of all banks and financial institutions in the country. It is responsible for regulating organisations involved in lending. In addition, the Financial Services and Markets Authority (FSMA) regulates the activities of financial institutions, including companies listed on the stock exchange, as well as firms providing financial services and products, including intermediaries. The FSMA also handles consumer protection and the collection of relevant information.

Credit companies are subject to prudential supervision, which includes adherence to regulations and laws governing banking activities. These laws are applied alongside the SSM Regulation of 15 October 2013, which governs the division of supervisory functions between the European Central Bank (ECB) and national authorities, including the National Bank of Belgium.

Obtaining a financial licence

Alternative investment fund in the Czech Republic for saleThe European Central Bank (ECB) has the authority to issue and revoke licences for all credit institutions, regardless of their size. The ECB also evaluates transactions involving the acquisition or transfer of assets between companies. In the supervisory process, the regulator is authorised to apply both European and national legislation.

The Central Bank of the state plays a crucial role in ensuring the stability of the country’s financial system. Its activities focus on overseeing less significant financial institutions and identifying and minimising potential threats to the financial sector. To achieve these objectives, the Central Bank performs the following tasks:

  • Identifying and monitoring factors and events that could destabilise the country’s financial system, including crises, liquidity threats, and systemic risks;
  • Developing and implementing strategies and recommendations for national regulatory authorities and EU institutions. These recommendations aim to strengthen the financial system’s resilience and prevent crises.

Credit companies are required to coordinate the implementation of new strategic decisions with the supervisory authority. If such initiatives are developed, the companies must notify the regulator, which has two months to review them. During this period, the regulator may reject the proposed changes if it deems that they:

  • Contradict the Banking Act; or
  • Pose risks to financial stability.

If a credit institution is found to be non-compliant with legislative requirements, the supervisory authority may issue an official notice demanding the correction of the identified violations. A similar warning may be issued if there is reason to believe that the organisation has committed violations within the past year. Typically, a deadline is set within which the credit institution must address the identified violations.

Bank management in Belgium

Before registering a financial company in Belgium, entrepreneurs must carefully plan the structure of the business. For the company to function successfully, the following key elements must be prepared:

  • A rational management structure, with a clear delegation of duties and responsibilities among employees;
  • A strict accounting and administrative system, along with the establishment of internal control bodies;
  • Various methods for identifying and managing risks that may arise in the course of operations;
  • An independent internal audit, as well as risk management mechanisms and compliance with legislative norms.

Each financial organisation is required to develop a corporate governance document, which provides detailed information about its internal structure. In addition, the organisation must create four committees:

  • Audit committee;
  • Risk management committee;
  • Appointments committee;
  • Remuneration committee.

All the main requirements for managing credit institutions are outlined in a special guide published by the local supervisory authority at the end of 2015 and updated in October 2018.

Capital and liquidity requirements for obtaining a banking licence

Banking system in BelgiumThe Basel III standards have been integrated into EU legislation through the CRD IV Directive and the CRR Regulation, and are also included in Belgium’s regulatory framework under the Banking Act.

Each credit institution is required to set liquidity and capital requirements based on the specific nature and scope of its operations. To this end, the board of directors develops a long-term management strategy that reflects both current and future capital and liquidity needs.

To apply for a banking licence in Belgium, a credit institution must prepare a capital and liquidity management policy.

This policy must take into account the volume, nature, and specifics of the company’s operations, as well as potential risks. The established indicators are subject to regular assessment and updating as necessary.

If a company’s policy does not align with its risk profile, the regulatory authority may impose additional solvency and liquidity requirements to ensure the stability and reliability of the credit institution’s operations.

The banking sector in the Netherlands

The banking sector in the Netherlands is thriving, with local banks successfully operating both domestically and internationally. Prominent financial institutions in the Netherlands include Rabobank, ABN AMRO, and ING.

Regulatory framework for the banking sector

The regulation of banking activities in the Netherlands focuses on two key aspects:

  • systemic and prudential supervision;
  • oversight of financial activities conducted by the organisation.

Systemic and prudential supervision in the Netherlands is shared between the European Central Bank (ECB) and the Dutch Central Bank (DCB).

The regulation of the financial services market is overseen by the Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM). The primary responsibilities of the AFM include:

  • ensuring transparency and accessibility of information for financial market participants;
  • promoting fair and clear relationships between market participants;
  • supervising the activities of companies providing financial services to clients.

Key regulatory framework

Securities Dealer Licence COREDOThe principal legislative framework governing financial institutions in the Netherlands is the Financial Markets Supervision Act (FMSA), enacted in 2007, along with related regulations and guidelines.

In 2016, a decision was made to revise the FMSA to align it with the modern realities of Europe. However, in 2019, the Dutch Minister of Finance decided to halt the revision process due to its complexity and significant financial costs, deeming it impractical at that time. As a result, the issuance of banking licences continues to be based on the provisions of the 2007 FMSA without significant changes.

In most cases, Dutch banks are subject to EU-level regulatory standards. A review of the FMSA reveals that many of its provisions are rooted in the implementation of European directives. With the modern drive for the integration of a unified market, numerous regulatory requirements are now enforced through European regulations.

Key among these are the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD IV) and the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR). On 9 July 2024, the updated Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR3) also came into effect.

Bank licence application process

Any bank in the Netherlands must hold a licence to carry out its activities.

All applications are processed by the Dutch Central Bank (DNB) and the European Central Bank (ECB). Strict requirements are set during the application review process, and compliance is monitored:

  • Management qualifications: the bank’s policies must be overseen by individuals who are suitably qualified to conduct banking activities in the Netherlands. These same qualifications apply to all members of the management team. Members of the supervisory board or its equivalent must meet the qualification requirements set by the regulatory authorities.
  • Business practices: the bank must ensure sound business practices, including client onboarding and effective risk management.
  • Executives: at least two individuals must be responsible for the daily operations of the bank and must perform their duties within the Netherlands.
  • Supervisory board composition: the supervisory board must include at least three members.
  • Control structure: the internal control system must be transparent and clear to the regulatory authorities.
  • Financial requirements: the bank must comply with solvency, liquidity, and minimum capital adequacy requirements (regulated under international standards, such as Basel III and relevant European directives).

These requirements must be adhered to even after the bank has obtained its licence in the Netherlands. Failure to comply with these standards may result in the revocation of the licence. Only organisations that strictly comply with all regulatory provisions can obtain a Dutch banking licence. The Netherlands actively supports innovation in the financial sector, and since 2017, the Dutch Central Bank (DNB) has used an individual assessment approach when reviewing applications for new financial products.

New changes in obtaining a financial licence

Since the beginning of 2019, the processing time for applications for a banking licence has been extended. As of 2025, the time required to issue a licence for conducting financial activities ranges from 6 to 9 months.

Banking in the NetherlandsAdditionally, a new requirement has been introduced: applicants must provide a document detailing the procedure for ceasing banking activities. This document must include a clear action plan in case the applicant decides to cease operations, aiming to minimise the impact on clients and the financial system.

Moreover, changes have been made to the capital requirements for banks and their operations. If a banking institution in the Netherlands decides to expand its activities and start offering investment services, it must apply for an extended licence. In this case, the regulator imposes additional requirements, as investment activities are considered new for the company.

For most payment and financial services, a licensed bank does not need to obtain an additional licence. These services include:

  • Consumer lending
  • Providing advice on financial products (excluding financial instruments)
  • Acting as an intermediary for such products.

However, if the bank decides to offer other services, such as those related to investment instruments or asset management, it will need to obtain the relevant authorisation.

Banking regulation in Norway

The financial sector in Norway includes 97 registered banking institutions, of which 82 are savings banks and the rest are commercial banks. It is worth noting that their number has significantly decreased over the past decade. Additionally, 40 credit companies are operating in the country, including branches of foreign banks, although not all of them offer a full range of services. The primary activity of these institutions is equipment financing.

The two largest and most influential commercial banks in Norway are DNB Bank ASA and Nordea Bank ABP, along with two savings bank groups: Eika Group and SpareBank 1 Group.

Foreign banks operate actively in Norway through branches, playing a key role in industries such as oil, maritime, and shipping.

How is banking regulated in Norway?

Norway is not a member of the European Union, but it has an agreement with the member states of the European Economic Area (EEA) and aligns with the adoption of relevant European financial directives. This agreement allows companies from EEA countries, as well as Norwegian entrepreneurs, to provide financial services within their jurisdiction, adhering to standards and requirements similar to those in Eurozone countries.

To accept deposits and issue loans, a bank in Norway must hold a Norwegian license, as required by national law. Banks operate under the “Financial Enterprises and Financial Groups Act,” adopted in 2015. This law mandates compliance with several European directives and regulations, including:

  • Capital Requirements Directive IV (CRD IV);
  • Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD);
  • Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR).

Alternative Investment Fund in the Czech RepublicThe Financial Enterprises Act regulates the activities of various organizations and structures, including:

  • Companies providing credit services;
  • Financial institutions;
  • Payment institutions;
  • Holding companies within financial groups;
  • E-money institutions;
  • Pension and insurance funds.

For banking companies involved with investment projects and funds in Norway, two key pieces of legislation are in place: the Alternative Investment Fund Act, adopted in 2014, and the Investment Fund Act, adopted in 2011. These laws regulate the operations of funds, including their structure and management requirements.

Since October 2018, Norway has implemented the Anti-Money Laundering (AML/CFT) Act, making it mandatory for Norwegian legislation to comply with the European Union’s Directive No. 4 on Anti-Money Laundering. This is crucial information for business owners intending to obtain a banking license in Norway.

Cryptocurrency transactions are permitted in Norway; however, an important requirement is that all such transactions must be registered and reported to the Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway (FSAN). Companies providing cryptocurrency services are required to obtain the appropriate license. To do so, they must notify the FSAN, which is responsible for overseeing and regulating cryptocurrency activities in the country.

Additionally, there is another important piece of legislation governing the activities of all financial organizations in Norway — the Financial Supervisory Act. The primary authority responsible for financial supervision is the FSAN. Its main functions include:

  • Monitoring and overseeing the activities of financial institutions;
  • Issuing licenses to all financial institutions operating in Norway;
  • Regulatory development;
  • Information management.

Acceptance of deposit funds

In Norway, the acceptance of deposit funds from the public is only permitted for financial companies holding a Norwegian banking license. Credit institutions without a banking license may accept repayable funds from the public, but not deposits, through the issuance of bonds or other similar securities.

Credit companies from EEA countries operating in Norway with a license from their home state are allowed to accept deposits only if this is explicitly stated in their license.

Issuance of loans

In Norway, the issuance of loans is a regulated activity that requires obtaining the appropriate license from the authorities. There is specific legislation in Norway that allows individuals to engage in crowdlending (peer-to-peer lending). Financial companies may not hold a banking license but can obtain a non-bank lending institution license to offer loans. One example of such companies are mortgage lending institutions that operate in the covered bond market. These organizations typically have savings groups, and they acquire their loan portfolios from banks.

Crowdlending is a form of lending where private companies can directly offer loans without the involvement of banks. Experts from our company, COREDO, have thoroughly researched this method and all the necessary legislation regulating crowdlending. If you are interested in the regulation of crowdlending, we are ready to provide you with consultation on all related matters.

Investment companies can also offer loans, but they must obtain the appropriate license.

Currency exchange

Foreign currency trading is permitted for banks, various payment institutions, and financial companies, provided they obtain a special licence issued by the regulator to conduct such activities.

Payment services

In Norway, registering a company to provide payment services and commencing operations is only possible with the appropriate licence.

The guiding document for organisations offering payment services (PSP) is the Payment Services Directive, which was incorporated into Norwegian legislation in 2010.

In 2018, Norway adopted the Payment Services and Electronic Money Act, which partially aligned national legislation with the requirements of the European PSD2 directive. This law regulates the activities of payment service providers and electronic money institutions, ensuring the safety and transparency of payment transactions.

Banking in NorwayPSD2 was fully implemented into Norwegian legislation following the enactment of the new Finance Agreements Act on January 1, 2023.

Investment proposals

Investment services are permitted in Norway for banks and limited liability companies, provided they hold the appropriate licenсe. This licenсe can be obtained directly by the bank or through its subsidiaries. Foreign companies holding a passport may also provide investment services within Norway.

Bank structures in Norway

Banks in Norway are organised under two primary legal structures:

  • Savings banks – these can raise capital through the issuance of equity certificates. Unlike shares, these securities do not grant their holders ownership rights to the bank’s charter capital.
  • Commercial banks – these are registered as public or private limited liability companies (LLCs). According to the Financial Institutions Act, all commercial banks established after January 1, 2016, must be public companies. However, if a bank operates as a subsidiary within a financial group, it can be organised as a private entity.

The minimum share capital requirement for all banks is the same – it must be at least €5,000,000.

Branches and cross-border services

According to EU and EEA directives, foreign banks registered in countries within the European Economic Area (EEA) are allowed to establish branches in Norway.

The primary regulatory authority for such banks is the Norwegian regulator, which oversees the activities of these branches on par with the bank’s internal structures. The main legislative act governing the operations of foreign banks in Norway is the Financial Institutions Act. These banks are also subject to the supervision of the Financial Supervisory Authority of Norway (FSAN).

Foreign banks operating in Norway can provide cross-border services under EU and EEA regulations.

However, banks registered outside the EEA are required to obtain a license in Norway by establishing a branch.

Regulation of banks in Hungary

The financial market in Hungary is overseen by the country’s main financial regulator, the Hungarian National Bank (MNB). The MNB is also responsible for managing systemic risks in the financial sector, protecting consumer rights, and supervising the capital and insurance markets.

Glossary COREDO AML auditThe key aspects of banking regulation in Hungary include:

  • Governmental control;
  • Deposit insurance;
  • Ensuring the fulfillment of risk and capital management requirements;
  • Guaranteeing monetary and fiscal stability;
  • Safeguarding protection of consumer rights and banking secrets.

If a banking institution violates the regulation, the MNB is entitled to:

  • Make a statement about a violation;
  • Require a bank to obey banking and prudential regulations;
  • Request an urgent report from a bank;
  • Demand the preparation and application of an action plan.

If a violation is considered serious, the MNB has the authority to appoint a supervisory commissioner to oversee the operations of a bank or its subsidiaries. This ensures compliance with regulations and facilitates the prompt resolution of any violations.

Governmental takeovers

When a systematic crisis takes place in Hungary’s financial sector, the regulator is required to notify the Minister for Monetary Regulation. The Minister decides on the appropriate course of action, which could involve increasing the capital of a financial institution or temporarily nationalising its shares. During nationalisation, the state gains the right to take control of financial institutions registered in Hungary.

Bankruptcy cases

When a bank is on the verge of bankruptcy, a supervisory commissioner is appointed to assume the rights and responsibilities of the Board of Directors. During the commissioner’s tenure, Board members are not permitted to make decisions. The task for banking institutions then is to invent a recovery plan that always depends on several factors, such as the seriousness of risks connected to their financial services and business model.

Capital adequacy requirements

To establish a bank in Hungary, a minimum capital of 2 billion Hungarian forints (approximately 6.3 million US dollars) is required. The same rules apply to foreign subsidiaries. All banking institutions must maintain the minimum level of capital to meet the requirements for solvency, liquidity, and risk mitigation related to banking activities.

In addition, banks are required to allocate 10% of their annual profit to a general reserve to cover operational losses. Failure to comply with capital adequacy requirements results in penalties.

Additionally, there are instances when the Board of Directors must notify the MNB within 48 hours about:

  • Changes in the bank’s share capital;
  • Suspension or cessation of the bank’s activities.

Insolvency

Before initiating the bankruptcy process, the MNB typically requires urgent measures to be taken, including:

  • Suspension of certain transactions;
  • Preparation of a schedule for the capital structure calculation;
  • Setting a maximum interest rate;
  • Holding a general meeting of shareholders;
  • Cancellation of consent for the appointment of personnel;
  • Compelling bank owners to carry out the required actions.

In the event of insolvency, the Board of Directors must immediately notify the MNB in writing. Once it is done, a bank or the MNB starts a liquidation process. If the court orders the liquidation of the bank, creditors are given a two-month period to submit their claims.

Regulation of banking activities in South Africa

The regulation of banking activities in South Africa is based on a strategic document issued by the country’s National Treasury, titled “A Safer Financial Sector to Serve South Africa Better.” Responsibility for protecting the national currency and ensuring sustainable economic growth is designated to one of the main financial regulators, the South African Reserve Bank (SARB).

In 2018, South Africa introduced a new law — the Financial Sector Regulation Act (FSR). This law became the foundation for the regulatory structure of the financial sector and is aimed at protecting clients, preventing financial crimes, and increasing public trust in the country’s financial system.

Banking in South AfricaIts main objectives include:

  • Protecting clients of financial institutions and ensuring fair treatment;
  • Preventing financial crimes;
  • Transforming the country’s financial system to enhance its efficiency;
  • Increasing public trust in the financial system;
  • Ensuring the safety and reliability of financial institutions.

The banking sector in South Africa is regulated and supervised based on the following legislative acts:

  • Companies Act
  • Banks Act
  • Mutual Banks Act
  • Co-operative Banks Act
  • National Payment System Act

Entrepreneurs planning to register a banking company in South Africa should note that banks are regulated by the following institutions:

  • FIC — Financial Intelligence Centre
  • BSD — Bank Supervision Department
  • NCR — National Credit Regulator

Additionally, local authorities have introduced new requirements in addition to the Banks Act. These aim to ensure compliance with BCBS (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision) standards. These requirements include:

  • Limited liquidity claims
  • Liquidity disclosure
  • Liquidity review
  • Intraday liquidity management
  • Capital disclosure
  • Public disclosure related to the leverage ratio.

For entrepreneurs planning to start financial activities in South Africa, it is important to consider all mandatory conditions for compliance with local standards established for banks and other key financial market participants.

These requirements relate not only to the observance of regulatory acts but also to ensuring financial stability and operational security.

This article provides an overview of the key principles and regulations governing the banking sector in countries such as Liechtenstein, Belgium, the Netherlands, Norway, Hungary and South Africa. However, it is important to note that for a full understanding of the specifics of doing business in each of these countries, it is advisable to consult with specialists who have detailed knowledge of the relevant laws and practices.

If you have any questions or need additional consultations on doing business in one of the above-mentioned countries, you can reach out to the specialists at COREDO. The COREDO team is always ready to help clarify legal and financial aspects and provide detailed assistance on any matters.

Challenges Faced by PSD2 and the Need for PSD3

On 28 June 2023, the European Commission presented a series of proposals comprising the Payment Services Directive 3 (PSD3)1 and the Payment Services Regulation (PSR). These new rules are the successors of the Payment Services Directive 2 (PSD2)2, which was introduced to transform the European Union payment market by enhancing user protection, fostering innovation and creating a fair environment for payment service providers (PSPs).

Evolution of European Payment Services Regulation PSD3 vs PSD2While PSD2 has brought notable improvements, it has faced particular challenges that have required updating the regulatory framework to adapt to the rapidly changing payment landscape.

Significant progress was made under PSD2. In particular, strong customer authentication (SCA) was introduced, which could be interpreted as a crucial step in the fight against fraud. In addition, PSD2 improved the efficiency, transparency and choice of payment instruments for users, offering them enhanced options and greater control over their payments.

However, PSD2 also faced difficulties in creating a level playing field for all PSPs. Non-bank PSPs often needed direct access to major payment systems, which created an imbalance between bank and non-bank PSPs. This imbalance hindered fair competition and innovation in the payment market.

Open Banking also faced challenges related to data access interfaces for service providers, and cross-border payment services expanded while payment systems remained centred in individual Member States. This led to differences in regulation and forum shopping3 between service providers, which further required regulatory changes.

PSD3’s main changes

Despite the excitement of the European Commission’s initial announcements about the need to reform European payment services legislation rather than radical changes, PSD3 introduces enhancements that are unlikely to require significant infrastructure changes but will improve security and service levels.

As digital innovation reshapes financial services, PSD3 becomes a critical step to strengthen customer protection and create a level playing field for non-bank payment service providers.

  1. Stricter requirements for strong customer authentication (SCA)

One of the key changes in PSD3 is more comprehensive requirements for strong customer authentication (SCA), which will add a layer of security to payment transactions. Additional proposed preventative measures include:

  • Require PSPs to verify that the payee’s name and unique identifier match before initiating credit transfers;
  • Providing a legal basis for PSPs to share fraud-related information;
  • Improved transaction monitoring;
  • Improve consumer rights;
  • Introducing an obligation for PSPs to inform their employees and customers about the risks and consequences of payment fraud.
  1. Increase consumer protection and trust in payments

Additional attention is being paid to combating fraud, including complex cases such as “spoofing4. Using IBANs and enhanced transaction monitoring represent new security measures to increase protection.

Open Banking, introduced by PSD2, will also change PSD3. New standards and more efficient data exchange mechanisms will be introduced to improve the concept further. In addition, consumer rights will be enhanced through more transparent communication and the provision of information on payment fees and delayed funds. Separately, more strictly obliging banks to provide bank account services to non-bank PSPs should be emphasised. With appropriate safeguards, this component of PSD3 gives these non-bank PSPs the right to have a bank account. This indicates a “levelling of the playing field” between banks and payment institutions.

  1. New opportunities for customers

PSD3 aims to increase the availability of cash by providing new methods, such as cashback without compulsory purchases in shops and incentivising an increase in the number of ATMs. New rules for managing temporarily held funds will ensure that unused funds are quickly returned to the customer.

Thus, PSD3 represents not only a change in legislation but also a strategic improvement of the payments system aimed at ensuring security, transparency and protection of the interests of all financial market participants in the EU. Nevertheless, in our view, the PSD3 innovations should not be considered “revolutionary” but rather “evolutionary” changes, representing a significant step towards a world of open finance.

What should we prepare for?

The potential effects of PSD3 on financial institutions, payment service providers, consumers, regulators and others falling within the scope of the Directive could be as follows:

  1. Increased competition in the financial market

In light of the fact that PSD3 emphasises the importance of providing PSPs with direct and indirect access to all EU payment systems, including bank accounts and digital banking schemes, and states that credit institutions will be obliged to provide PSPs with access to bank accounts in the future, the Directive essentially takes a position where full integration of PSPs into banking is required, giving them unrestricted access to financial instruments within the European Union.

  1. Changes in the banking landscape

Banks contemplating expansion in Europe or beyond are advised to explore the implementation of Open Banking. The possibility of more accessible access to payment systems may incentivise a bank looking to expand its global footprint to view itself as an electronic money institution (EMI) rather than obtaining a full banking licence.

  1. Improving the level of security of payment transactions

More burdensome payment security requirements will require payment service providers to implement advanced technologies for solid authentication, improve payer data verification systems, actively engage in fraud information sharing, implement more effective transaction monitoring mechanisms, and adapt to new regulations that expand consumers’ refund rights.

Implementation of PSD3 in the Legislation of the EU Member States

Evolution of European Payment Services Regulation PSD3 vs PSD2The implementation of PSD3 in the Member States of the European Union will follow a structured timetable similar to previous directives. The European Commission will publish the final text of PSD3, specifying its provisions and requirements. EU member states will have a set period to transpose the Directive into national legislation.

The timeframes for transposition may vary but usually range from one to two years after the publication of the final text.

During this period, each Member State must adapt its existing laws and regulations to align them with the provisions of PSD3, ensuring uniformity and consistency across the EU.

Implementing the PSD3 into national law is a pivotal step to ensure its effective implementation. It involves the relevant public authorities of each Member State taking the necessary legislative measures to implement the requirements of the PSD3 in their national jurisdictions. This process may require the amendment of existing laws or the adoption of new legislation to comply fully with the Directive’s provisions.

Entry into Force

The final implementation schedule for PSD3 and PSR has yet to be determined. Final versions should be available by the end of 2024. Typically, Member States are given a transition period of 18 months, which implies that PSD3 and PSR could enter into force around 2026.

In conclusion, all persons subject to the scope of the new rules require a clear strategy, risk assessment, and diligent execution to successfully manage the potential consequences of the entry of the regulations under PSD3 and PSR into force.

It is critical for financial institutions to remain informed of all changes affecting them and to clearly define the overall strategy and interim steps to achieve compliance with such changes.

COREDO’s team of experts can advise you on any of the above points and their potential impact on your business and help you better navigate the new regulatory landscape.

By Dmitry Vyalkov, LLM, lawyer at COREDO.

————-
1 Proposal for a DIRECTIVE OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL on payment services and electronic money services in the Internal Market amending Directive 98/26/EC and repealing Directives 2015/2366/EU and 2009/110/EC
2 Directive (EU) 2015/2366 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 November 2015 on payment services in the internal market, amending Directives 2002/65/EC, 2009/110/EC and 2013/36/EU and Regulation (EU) No 1093/2010, and repealing Directive 2007/64/EC (Text with EEA relevance)
3 “forum shopping” refers to the practice of selecting the more “appropriate” court that will view a lawsuit most favourably.
4 “Spoofing” is an impersonation fraud that blurs the distinction between unauthorised and authorised transactions because the consent given by the customer to authorise the transaction is subject to manipulative techniques by the fraudster, who, for example, uses the bank’s phone number or email address.

We are being approached by more and more clients who have bought/established a crypto-company in the Czech Republic but are not sure what all activities this company can perform or are not sure how to run their business in a way that does not violate the law.

Cooperation with COREDO eliminates these concerns. COREDO is headquartered in the Czech Republic, has a wide client base from all over the world, and most importantly has experienced staff that handles various situations related to the cryptocurrency business on a daily basis.

Information on how we work

  1. Already, during the registration of crypto-companies, we address whether the client also needs other authorisations for so-called accompanying services. That means that we deal with the individual business models of our clients. This approach is a good prevention against unauthorised provision of services (e.g. payment or investment services).

How to protect your business from chargeback claims

  1. We provide the option of renting an office that will not be treated as a virtual office – this can make all the difference when opening a bank account.
  1. We have a wide network of banking partners who are willing to open a bank account for our clients (not a payment account or e-wallet).
  1. Clients can make any changes within their crypto-company and deal with authorities or partners (contractual negotiations) through us. Their presence in the Czech Republic is thus not a condition for running their businesses.
  1. We enable comprehensive servicing of crypto companies, including AML, accounting, whistleblowing, data protection, preparation of contractual documents, etc.
  1. It doesn’t end with the sale/registration of the company for us. If you buy a crypto company directly from us, we will give you priority service when you contact us later with any problem or question.

We have published articles on cryptocurrency companies in the past that may help you find answers to your most common questions. Cryptocurrencies have long been an area of interest for us.

At COREDO, we also already know that no problem is so big that it can’t be solved! Your success is our priority.

Sincerely,
COREDO team

In the world of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technologies, the classification of crypto assets plays a crucial role in defining their characteristics and legal status. The reflection of this classification in legislation is paramount for companies engaging in operations involving such assets. In this article, we will explore the widely accepted classification of crypto assets, their regulation at the European Union level, and the legal status of various crypto assets in the Czech Republic, with a particular emphasis on the role of the Czech VASP (Virtual Assets Service Provider) licence in this context.

What does Crypto Asset mean?

A crypto asset (token) is a digital representation of value or rights that can be transferred and stored electronically using distributed ledger technology (DLT) or similar technology.

According to the commonly accepted classification of crypto assets, tokens are differentiated as follows:

Classification of Crypto Assets

Fungible Tokens are tokens that are not identical and can be exchanged with one another. Fungible tokens are typically classified as follows:

  • Payment Tokens can serve as a means of exchange or payment;
  • Utility Tokens may provide access to a specific product or service;
  • Investment Tokens may represent financial claims against the issuer or grant governance rights to their holders (token-holders).

Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) tokens that cannot be interchangeable due to their uniqueness. Such a token is tied to specific information or an asset, such as a music track, video, or image.

How are Crypto Assets regulated at the European Union level?

The crypto-sphere is subject to regulation by the MiCA Regulation and MiFID II Directive. MiCA aims to establish uniform rules for crypto-assets in the European Union. In contrast, MiFID II focuses on financial instruments and the provision of investment services. MiCA’s provisions will come into effect from December 30, 2024. However, the final version of the Regulation has already been published and approved as of June 23, 2023. Moreover, specific token categories may also fall under the regulation of MiFID II.

The MiCA Regulation sets standards for identifying and classifying crypto-assets in the European Union. Based on the crypto-assets definition, MiCA differentiates individual tokens into three subcategories: utility tokens, asset-referenced tokens, and electronic money tokens.Classification of Crypto Assets

  • Utility Token (as per MiCA interpretation) is a digital token that provides access to goods or services through digital platforms. It lacks financial purposes and is associated with the token issuer. Unlike asset-referenced or electronic money tokens, a utility token is not tied to a specific asset. Its primary purpose is to facilitate the functional use of blockchain systems rather than creating future cash flows.
  • Asset-Referenced Token is a type of crypto-asset aimed at maintaining price stability by being pegged to multiple fiat currencies, commodities, or other crypto-assets. It can be used for payments and savings. For the public offering or trading such tokens, the issuer must obtain a licence from the competent authority of its EU member state. It is important to note that, unlike utility token issuers, issuers of asset-referenced tokens must submit a “White Paper” for approval to the competent authority of their EU member state. The “White Paper” is considered approved upon the issuer obtaining a licence for the public offering or trading of such tokens on a crypto platform. This requirement is introduced to enhance consumer protection and market integrity.
  • Electronic Money Token – a crypto-asset tied to a fiat currency and designed for stable payments. Unlike asset-referenced tokens, this token is primarily used for purchasing goods and services. The issuer of such a token must comply with a banking licence or electronic money provider licence requirements (depending on the situation) and publish its “White Paper.” Companies wishing to deal with this crypto-asset do not need a separate licence, as the issuance of this token is regulated by banking and electronic money laws. The issuer must also publish the “White Paper,” notifying the supervisory authority of its EU member state. However, similar to the utility token, the “White Paper” of an electronic money token does not necessarily require approval by the competent authorities of its EU member state.

However, despite the MiCA Regulation closing the existing regulatory gap regarding crypto-assets, it does not affect the regulation of crypto-assets already falling under the existing regulatory framework (e.g., MiFID II).

An interesting point

Notably, some non-fungible tokens (NFTs) remain outside the scope of MiCA Regulation. The Regulation explicitly states: “This Regulation should not apply to crypto-assets that are unique and not fungible with other crypto-assets, including digital art and collectables.”

Nevertheless, MiCA establishes that merely assigning a unique identifier to a token does not indicate its non-fungibility. According to the Regulation, tokens issued in large series may be deemed fungible, and, consequently, issuers and providers may need to obtain the necessary licence. At the same time, NFTs could hypothetically fall under the scope of MiFID II if the token exhibits characteristics of a financial instrument (e.g., representing a tokenized security or tokenized share).

Therefore, non-fungible tokens currently remain outside the realm of precise legal regulation at the EU level. In this regard, we strongly recommend issuers and providers to carefully examine the features and characteristics of each NFT they intend to work with to obtain the relevant licence if necessary and avoid penalties and criminal prosecution.

Considering the aspects reflected in the MiCA Regulation and MiFID Directive, the differentiation of crypto-assets can be illustrated as follows:

Classification of Crypto Assets

And what is the situation with the status of a crypto asset in the Czech Republic?

The status of crypto-assets in the Czech Republic involves a combination of European and Czech legal frameworks, each contributing its definitions and regulations for dealing with crypto-assets. Here are some clarifications based on Czech legislation.

In the Czech Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Act, the term “virtual asset” was established by the legislator. A virtual asset, as defined in the AML Act, is a unit stored or transmitted electronically capable of performing payment, exchange, or investment functions, except when it qualifies as a security, investment, or monetary instrument under the Payment System Act.

What are the Requirements for an FCA AuthorizationAccording to the AML Act, a virtual asset, in its broad sense, covers all types of crypto-assets described above, excluding tokens exhibiting characteristics of securities and qualifying as investment instruments under the Investment Company and Investment Funds Act.

The Czech National Bank asserts that although Czech legislation does not recognise digital securities (except for dematerialized securities held in central or separate custody), foreign crypto-assets may be considered securities under foreign law. Similarly, Czech or foreign crypto assets may be regarded as derivatives under Czech and foreign law.

From the above, it follows that tokens acting as investments may fall under the definition of an investment instrument under the Investment Company and Investment Funds Act. For instance, a security token could be such an investment instrument. Therefore, anyone wishing to provide services related to security tokens can engage in such activities only based on a licence issued by the Czech National Bank and in line with the Investment Company and Investment Funds Act. A Czech VASP licence would be sufficient in all other cases. Further details about its capabilities are provided in our article How we helped our client launch a cryptocurrency exchange in the Czech Republic?”

An exciting nuance

Due to the favourable climate in the cryptocurrency sphere in the Czech jurisdiction, individuals without a VASP licence in the Czech Republic are authorised to engage in the following activities:

  • Simply accepting virtual assets as payment for goods or services;
  • Managing a mining centre or mining pool;
  • Issuing in-game currency (i.e., when a computer game operator issues in-game currency, but it is not considered a virtual asset).

Thus, despite the incompleteness of the legal regulation of the crypto sphere, we observe how European legislators are gradually taking steps to fill gaps in the legal status of crypto assets and related activities.

The Czech Republic is keeping pace with overall European trends and is systematically and flexibly introducing new norms to regulate the cryptocurrency industry, creating a favourable landscape for individuals wishing to engage in crypto activities within the Republic.

However, in Czech legislation, like in other jurisdictions, there are specific nuances, especially considering that the MiCA Regulation still needs to be in effect. In such intricacies, the company COREDO can assist you. Understanding the classification of crypto assets and their regulation is crucial for successful business operations in the Czech Republic and the European Union as a whole.

By Dmitry Vyalkov, LLM, lawyer at COREDO

————–
1 Please be advised that for the purposes of this article, the terms “crypto asset” and “token” are used synonymously.
2 
Point 5 § 1 art. 3 of REGULATION (EU) 2023/1114 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 31 May 2023 on markets in crypto-assets, and amending Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010 and (EU) No 1095/2010 and Directives 2013/36/EU and (EU) 2019/1937 (hereinafter – “MiCA Regulation”). Date of access: 30.11.2023.
3 
 Directive on Markets in Financial Instruments repealing Directive 2004/39/EC and amending Directive 2011/61/EU and Directive 2002/92/EC (MiFID II). Date of access: 30.11.2023
4 
Art. 11 of the MiCA Regulation
5 
Points 8 and 9 § 4 of  Zákon č. 253/2008 Sb. o některých opatřeních proti legalizaci výnosů z trestné činnosti a financování terorismu. Date of access: 30.11.2023
6 
Zákon č. 240/2013 Sb. o investičních společnostech a investičních fondech (hereinafter “ZISIF”). Date of access: 30.11.2023

Legal regulation of crypto activities in the Czech Republic

In the Czech Republic, crypto activities are regulated by several legislative acts, including the Act on Certain Measures Against the Legalisation of Proceeds from Criminal Activities, the Financing of Terrorism and the Trade Licensing Act. Therefore, obtaining a licence for entrepreneurial activities related to cryptocurrency services (Virtual Assets Service Provider Licence) in the Czech Republic follows the above mentioned laws.

How to protect your business from chargeback claimsNotably, a company holding a VASP licence in the Czech Republic can offer its services to clients from other countries. However, if such services are provided in another European Union country (remotely, without establishing a branch), it can only be done temporarily and irregularly.

Additionally, the advantages of the Czech Republic include:

  • Transparency of the tax system;
  • Economic stability in a country located in the heart of Europe;
  • The ability to register a company for non-residents;
  • Registered capital starting from 1 CZK;
  • No need for personal presence during registration.

The situation

The client approached us with a request to launch a cryptocurrency exchange with the capability to exchange fiat for cryptocurrency and vice versa. The client’s primary requirement was working with both residents and non-residents of the EU. Due to time constraints, the client requested minimal involvement in the process. Additionally, the client asked for an evaluation of the legality and feasibility of his business model.

Tasks at hand

Our task was to assist the client in choosing the most suitable jurisdiction for his requirements.

We suggested considering the Czech Republic’s developed financial infrastructure and business-friendly environment. The client agreed with our reasoning, and we began implementing the project.

Firstly, we helped the client assess the feasibility of their business model and adapted it to Czech legislation. We then prepared all the necessary documentation for registration with regulatory authorities. After registering the legal entity, we obtained the required type of licence for the client and notified the Financial Analytical Office of the Czech Republic (FAU).

Furthermore, we utilised our comprehensive document base (drafts), essential for operating a cryptocurrency exchange (user agreement, cookie policy, internal documentation, and other crucial documents), significantly speeding up the business launch process.

The result

we helped our client launch a cryptocurrency exchange in the Czech RepublicThrough our efforts, we achieved the following:

  1. Identified the most suitable jurisdiction for the client’s needs;
  2. Adapted the client’s business model to Czech legislation;
  3. Registered the legal entity without the client’s physical presence;
  4. Opened a payment account in a European bank;
  5. Obtained the necessary licence (fiat/crypto and vice versa);
  6. Prepared all necessary internal documentation and policies for the website.

In conclusion, we helped our client launch his cryptocurrency exchange in the desired format.

Our main goal is to simplify our client’s lives and help them bring their ideas to life, leveraging our knowledge of the nuances and advantages of Czech jurisdiction due to our specialists’ presence in the Czech Republic. Suppose our clients need clarification or refinement of business models.

In that case, we are ready to assist them, drawing on our extensive experience and knowledge in obtaining cryptocurrency licences in the Czech Republic, launching cryptocurrency exchanges, and providing ongoing legal, financial, and AML (anti-money laundering) support.

By Dmitry Vyalkov, LLM, Lawyer at COREDO

Cryptocurrencies and crypto-business have become integral parts of the modern economy. Consequently, questions about obtaining cryptocurrency licences in different countries are becoming increasingly relevant. However, on this journey, one may encounter various myths and misconceptions that can lead to misunderstanding and delay the process. Let’s debunk 5 common myths about obtaining a cryptocurrency licence in the Czech Republic.

Myth 1: The licence is issued by the Czech National Bank (CNB)

Myths about obtaining a cryptocurrency licence in the Czech RepublicThe first myth is that many believe the Czech National Bank issues the licence for crypto-business.

In reality, the licensing of cryptocurrency activities in the Czech Republic is carried out by the Trade Licensing Office. Subsequently, the Financial Analytical Office of the Czech Republic, the main supervisory body for AML regulation concerning the activities of all cryptocurrency exchanges in the country, is informed about the company’s contact person.

Myth 2: A business plan is required for the regulatory authority

The second common myth is related to the regulatory authority’s need to provide a business plan.

In reality, the Trade Licensing Office does not require a business plan to obtain a cryptocurrency licence, making the licensing process simpler than in Estonia.

Myth 3: Only EU citizens can be directors

The third myth is that only European Union citizens can be directors of companies obtaining a cryptocurrency licence in the Czech Republic.

This is not true. Czech law allows foreign citizens to hold corporate leadership positions, including crypto-companies.

The critical condition is compliance with all necessary legal requirements and providing the required documentation when applying for a licence.

Myth 4: A bank account is required for company registration and capital contribution

Another common misconception is the requirement for a bank account for company registration and capital contribution.

In reality, there is an alternative method in the Czech Republic. You can contribute the statutory capital in cash to the administrator of the cash deposit, who can be the director of the registering company. You must only open a bank account after the company’s registration.

However, please be advised that there are limitations on the amount of statutory capital that can be paid in this way.

Myth 5: Personal presence is required for company registration and licensing

Yet another common myth is the belief that personal presence in the country is required for company registration.

However, this is not the case. The registration of a crypto-company in the Czech Republic can be done remotely, without physical presence in the country. All stages, including document collection and submission, interaction with registration authorities, notaries, and obtaining the necessary licences, can be done remotely through an authorised representative with power of attorney. However, consulting only qualified specialists with experience in this process is strongly recommended.

In conclusion, by adhering to all legal requirements and providing the necessary documentation, it is possible to successfully obtain a crypto licence in the Czech Republic and start your crypto business quickly. The COREDO team is ready to assist you at all stages of this process, providing maximum support and attention to detail.

By Dmitry Vyalkov, LLM, lawyer at COREDO