Blog

A reinsurance contract is a specialized insurance contract where the reinsured (cedent) transfers part or all of the risk of the primary insurance policy to the reinsurer in exchange for a reinsurance premium. This mechanism allows insurance risks to be redistributed among market participants and forms a sustainable structure for the insurance portfolio of an international company. In COREDO practice, we often encounter entrepreneurs who confuse reinsurance with co-insurance or double insurance: it is important to understand that reinsurance is not duplication but rather the transfer of part of the liability to the reinsurer, which becomes the second level of protection for the business’s property interests.

At least two parties are involved in a reinsurance contract: the reinsured (usually an insurance company or a large corporate insurer) and the reinsurer (a specialized reinsurance company, syndicate, or pool). In international practice, the services of reinsurance brokers, who help select optimal reinsurance programs taking into account the specifics of the insurance portfolio and liability limits, are actively used.

Reinsurance Contract, Key Provisions

The key elements of any reinsurance contract are:

  • the object of reinsurance (specific insurance risks or a portfolio of risks)
  • insurance amount
  • liability limit of the reinsurer
  • conditions for the occurrence of an insured event
  • procedure for insurance payment

It is important to competently determine the subject of the contract, as this will depend on which risks and to what extent will be transferred and which will remain with the reinsured. In COREDO practice, we recommend detailing the types of insurance risks, methods of their assessment, and the procedure for managing insurance losses to minimize disputes and ensure transparency in reinsurance transactions.

Rights and Obligations in the Reinsurance Contract

The rights and obligations of the reinsured and reinsurer are detailed in the contract and depend on the chosen reinsurance program.
  • The reinsured is obliged to disclose all relevant information about the insurance risks, comply with the terms of underwriting, and promptly pay the reinsurance premium.
  • The reinsurer provides reinsurance protection, participates in insurance loss adjustment, pays compensation within the liability limit, and may require Due Diligence to be conducted on the reinsurance object.

Solutions developed at COREDO provide for a clear distribution of rights and obligations, which is especially important when working with international reinsurance markets and syndicates.

Types of Reinsurance, What It Is and How It Is Applied

Illustration for the section «Types of Reinsurance, What It Is and How It Is Applied» in the article «Reinsurance Contract – Key Provisions and Features»
The modern market offers a wide range of reinsurance programs that differ in the principle of risk distribution and the degree of involvement of the parties. For international companies, hybrid models that combine elements of facultative and obligatory reinsurance are particularly relevant.

Proportional and Non-Proportional Reinsurance, Distinction

In proportional reinsurance (quota share, surplus), the reinsured and reinsurer share insurance premiums and losses in a pre-established proportion. This approach ensures transparency of settlements and simplicity in managing reinsurance reserves.
In non-proportional reinsurance (excess of loss, stop-loss), the reinsurer covers losses only when they exceed a certain liability limit.

In COREDO practice, we often recommend non-proportional schemes to protect against catastrophic risks and optimize capital during international expansion.

Reinsurance and Retrocession – What Is It?

Retrocession: it is the retransfer of part of the assumed risks to other reinsurers or reinsurance syndicates.

This mechanism allows the formation of reinsurance pools and increasing reinsurance capacity, especially important for large transnational transactions. In one of COREDO’s projects in the EU: during the structuring of a reinsurance program for a holding with assets in several countries, retrocession allowed for a reduction in the total reinsurance premium and ensured resistance to cash losses even in the event of several insured events occurring simultaneously.

Reinsurance Contract: How to Conclude?

Illustration for the section «Reinsurance Contract: How to Conclude?» in the article «Reinsurance Contract – Key Provisions and Features»
Concluding a reinsurance contract requires not only legal expertise but also an in-depth analysis of insurance risks, assessing the financial stability of the reinsurer, and compliance with international compliance standards.

Assessment of Reinsurance Risks

The assessment of reinsurance risks starts with analyzing the insurance portfolio, identifying potential insurance losses, and determining liability limits.

At COREDO, we apply comprehensive underwriting of reinsurance risks, including modeling scenarios of catastrophic losses and stress-testing the financial stability of a company. Effective management of reinsurance risks is built on the principles of risk management, transparency, and constant monitoring of reinsurance programs.

Mandatory and Additional Conditions of the Contract

In the structure of the reinsurance contract, it is mandatory to specify: the object of reinsurance, a list of insurance risks, liability limit, conditions for the occurrence of an insured event, procedure for insurance payout, and reinsurance protection.
Optional conditions may include cross-border dispute resolution features, retrocession procedure, requirements for insurance reserves, and reinsurance process automation mechanisms.

COREDO’s practice confirms: clear detailing of contract conditions is the key to reducing regulatory and operational risks.

Reinsurance Premium and Commission – Calculation

The reinsurance premium is calculated based on the probability of an insured event occurring, the amount of risks transferred, and the liability limit.

The reinsurance commission is the remuneration for the reinsured for organizing and accompanying the transaction. In international practice, both fixed and floating rates are used, depending on the structure of the reinsurance program and the level of reinsurance protection. COREDO’s solutions allow optimizing settlements and automating payments using digital reinsurance platforms.

Reinsurance: Practice in the EU, Asia, and CIS

Illustration for the section «Reinsurance: Practice in the EU, Asia, and CIS» in the article «Reinsurance Contract – Key Provisions and Features»
International companies face different approaches to reinsurance regulation, compliance requirements, and features of reinsurance markets. COREDO’s experience includes supporting clients in the EU, Asia, and the CIS, where their own standards and regulatory restrictions apply.

Reinsurance Regulation in the EU, Asia, and CIS

In EU countries, reinsurance regulation is based on the Solvency II directives, which establish requirements for capital, risk management, and transparency in reinsurance transactions.
In Asia, variability is observed: Singapore and Hong Kong orient themselves to international standards and FATF, while some countries retain national regulatory features.
In the CIS, control over compliance and AML procedures is being strengthened, requirements for KYC and reporting are being introduced.

COREDO’s practice shows that competent preparation of documents and due diligence of the reinsurer is the key to successful registration and support of international transactions.

Reinsurance: AML, FATF, KYC

Modern compliance strategies require the integration of reinsurance into AML, FATF, and KYC procedures. Reinsurance becomes not only an insurance risk management tool but also an important part of the system for preventing financial crimes and sanction risks. COREDO’s team has implemented projects for the automation of compliance processes, which allowed clients to increase the transparency of reinsurance transactions and comply with international reporting standards.

Reinsurance in International Transactions

Cross-border transactions require special attention to due diligence, evaluation of cross-border risks, and protection from sanction limitations.

Reinsurance when registering a company in the EU or entering Asian markets becomes an integral part of the risk management strategy. In one of COREDO’s cases for a fintech startup in Singapore, reinsurance allowed for a reduction in capital cost and provided access to international investments, as well as successfully passed the licensing procedure with the local regulator.

Reinsurance for Risk Management

Illustration for the section «Reinsurance for Risk Management» in the article «Reinsurance Contract – Key Provisions and Features»
For modern international companies, reinsurance is not only protection against insurance losses but also a strategic tool for optimizing corporate finance, increasing investment attractiveness, and integrating into ESG strategies.

Impact of Reinsurance on Stability and Income

Reinsurance allows optimizing the structure of the insurance portfolio, reducing capital cost, and increasing ROI through risk redistribution and reduction of unforeseen losses. Solutions developed at COREDO have helped clients in the EU and Asia increase financial stability through the implementation of flexible reinsurance programs and automation of reinsurance reserve calculations.

In today’s sustainable development requirements, integrating reinsurance into corporate governance and implementing ESG strategies is becoming increasingly important.

Reinsurance in Corporate Governance and ESG

Integrating reinsurance into corporate governance promotes sustainable development, reduces regulatory and operational risks, and supports ESG compliance.

In COREDO practice, we observe increasing interest in reinsurance as part of corporate responsibility and long-term sustainable development strategy.

Reinsurance and Digital Solutions for Business

Digital reinsurance platforms and automation of reinsurance processes are becoming the standard for international companies.

Such solutions provide transaction transparency, accelerate settlements, and allow reinsurance integration into the company’s overall IT architecture. COREDO’s team has implemented several projects for the implementation of digital solutions, enabling clients to minimize operational costs and increase the efficiency of managing reinsurance programs.

In the rapidly developing market, practical recommendations for increasing competitiveness are becoming relevant.

Practical Tips for Entrepreneurs

Illustration for the section «Practical Tips for Entrepreneurs» in the article «Reinsurance Contract – Key Provisions and Features»
Practical tips for entrepreneurs will help understand the specifics of reinsurance in different markets worldwide. Differences between the EU, Asia, and CIS affect working conditions and company requirements, so it’s important to understand their key distinctions to choose the optimal business development strategy.

Reinsurance in the EU, Asia, and CIS: Comparison

Criterion EU Asia CIS
Regulatory Requirements Solvency II Directives National Regulators, FATF National Laws, FATF
AML/Compliance Strict Control Variability Enhanced Control
Documents for Conclusion KYC, Licenses, Reporting KYC, Licenses, Business Plans KYC, Licenses
Digitization Possibility High Growing Medium

How to Conclude an International Reinsurance Contract

  • Conduct due diligence on the reinsurer (rating, reputation, licenses)
  • Check compliance of the contract with international standards and jurisdiction requirements
  • Assess risks and liability limits
  • Set up compliance procedures (AML/KYC)
  • Prepare a package of documents for contract conclusion
  • Integrate reinsurance into the corporate risk management strategy

Practical Tips

  • Integrate reinsurance into the corporate risk management system: use it to optimize capital and protect against cross-border risks.
  • Choose a reinsurer based on rating, industry experience, and willingness to ensure transparent deals.
  • Automate reinsurance processes using digital platforms: this will increase speed and reduce costs.
  • Pay special attention to compliance: reinsurance should comply with AML, FATF, and KYC requirements, especially when operating in the EU and Asia.
  • Regularly assess the effectiveness of reinsurance: analyze ROI, impact on capital cost, and financial stability.

Frequently Asked Questions and Key Takeaways

The reinsurance contract is not just a legal tool but a strategic resource for international business, allowing the management of insurance risks, optimization of corporate finances, and compliance with the strictest compliance requirements.
COREDO’s experience shows that competent integration of reinsurance into corporate governance and financial modeling structure ensures resistance to shocks, accelerates international expansion, and increases a company’s investment attractiveness.

  • What strategic advantages does a reinsurance contract provide? Risk redistribution, loss reduction, increased financial stability, and compliance with international standards.
  • How does reinsurance affect ROI? By reducing unforeseen losses, reinsurance increases the predictability of returns and reduces capital cost.
  • What documents are needed to conclude a contract? KYC, licenses, reporting, business plans, compliance confirmation.
  • How to choose a reinsurer? Evaluate the rating, experience, transparency, and compliance with jurisdiction requirements.
  • How to integrate reinsurance into risk management strategy? Include reinsurance in corporate risk management, automate processes, and regularly assess effectiveness.

If you want to get individual advice on choosing a reinsurance program or integrating reinsurance into the structure of your international company – the COREDO team is ready to share practical experience and offer the best solutions for your business.

Every third business in Europe and Asia faces supply delays due to inefficient logistics, while in Africa, up to 40% of cargo loses value due to disruptions at transport corridor junctions and customs procedures. In a situation where the speed of entering new markets and transparency of supply chain management (SCM) determine competitiveness, the role of a freight forwarder extends far beyond classical forwarding. Why does a freight forwarder in logistics today become not just an intermediary but a strategic partner for international business? How to choose a partner who will ensure not only the organization of cargo transportation but also minimize risks, optimize logistics costs, and ensure compliance with international standards?

In this article, I, Nikita Veremeev, founder of COREDO, will share practical recommendations, strategic ideas, and cases from our team’s experience so you can not only understand the key functions of a freight forwarder but also gain maximum benefit for your business. If you want to understand how modern forwarders help scale exports, implement digital tools and manage the complexities of international logistics: read to the end.

What is a freight forwarder in simple terms

Illustration for the section 'What is a freight forwarder in simple terms' in the article 'Freight forwarder in logistics – key functions'
What is a freight forwarder in simple terms? It’s not just a carrier but a specialist who organizes the entire cargo delivery process – from document preparation to choosing the optimal route and transport. Let’s delve further into what exactly a freight forwarder does and what their work involves.

Freight forwarder: what it is and what it does

A freight forwarder is a professional intermediary who undertakes comprehensive organization of transport forwarding, including route planning, preparation of transport documentation (CMR, Bill of Lading), coordination of multimodal transportation, and interaction with transport service providers. Unlike traditional carriers, a logistics forwarder does not own their transport but acts as a solution integrator within third-party logistics (3PL), ensuring end-to-end control and optimization of supply chain management (SCM).

The key responsibilities of a freight forwarder include:

  • strategic planning of the supply chain;
  • cargo consolidation and delivery route optimization;
  • documentation preparation and verification;
  • incident and claim management;
  • ensuring compliance with international standards (compliance);
  • quality control of logistics services.
COREDO’s practice confirms that it is the integration of these functions that allows a forwarder to act as a driver of efficiency and transparency in international logistics.

The role of a forwarder in international logistics

A forwarder in logistics plays a key role in organizing cargo transportation between EU, Asia, and Africa countries, taking on not only physical delivery but also supply management, customs clearance, interaction with regulatory authorities, and compliance with Incoterms.

Our experience at COREDO has shown: a proper choice of freight forwarder not only accelerates processes but also significantly reduces risks associated with delays, documentation errors, and unforeseen costs. In the context of increasing demands for transparency and risk management in logistics, a forwarder becomes the link between the manufacturer, carrier, and final client, ensuring a high level of customer experience in B2B logistics.

A detailed analysis of the functions of a forwarder will help understand why their participation is critical for effective logistics.

Functions of a freight forwarder in logistics

Illustration for the section 'Functions of a freight forwarder in logistics' in the article 'Freight forwarder in logistics – key functions'

The functions of a freight forwarder in logistics cover a wide range of tasks related to transportation and supply organization. Due to their expertise and knowledge in logistics, a freight forwarder ensures the efficient, timely, and economical movement of goods from sender to recipient. Let’s consider the key activity areas that form the basis of the work of a freight forwarder in logistics.

Logistics coordination and supply management

One of the main functions of a freight forwarder: coordination of the logistics chain, including the organization of multimodal transport (sea, rail, road, air), cargo consolidation, and delivery route optimization.

The COREDO team has implemented projects where, through competent cargo consolidation and the selection of international transport corridors, it was possible to reduce logistics costs by up to 18% compared to traditional schemes.

The forwarder also oversees supply management, which includes deadline monitoring, warehouse inventory management, and route adaptation for seasonal peaks or force majeure situations.

Customs documentation preparation for transportation

A freight forwarder takes on the preparation of customs documents, including export declarations, certificates of origin, transport documentation (CMR, Bill of Lading), and electronic data interchange (EDI).

A solution developed at COREDO for clients exporting products to the EU and Asia allows automating the customs clearance process, minimizing the risks of delays and fines.

The forwarder also ensures the accompaniment of international transportation, interacting with regulatory authorities and monitoring compliance in international transportation.

Logistics risks and cargo insurance

Risk management in logistics is one of the key competencies of a modern freight forwarder. This includes cargo insurance, incident and claim management, as well as the development of SLA (Service Level Agreement), defining parameters of responsibility and service quality.

COREDO’s practice shows: integrating risk management into supply chains and insuring cargo allows clients to minimize losses in case of force majeure situations and ensure uninterrupted supply even in unstable markets.

Digitization tools in freight forwarding

Illustration for the section 'Digitization tools in freight forwarding' in the article 'Freight forwarder in logistics – key functions'
Digitization tools in freight forwarding allow companies to automate key transportation stages, enhance process transparency, and respond quickly to changes. Modern digital solutions, such as TMS systems, cargo monitoring, and electronic document interchange: are becoming an integral part of effective logistics and help better control all supply chains.

Cargo tracking: digital tools

Modern freight forwarders actively implement digital tools: track & trace systems, IT system integration, electronic data interchange (EDI), IoT solutions for cargo condition monitoring.

In one of COREDO’s cases, integrating a client’s ERP system with a forwarder’s digital platform allowed ensuring transparency and control at all stages of the logistics chain, improving decision-making speed and reducing the number of errors in data processing.

Digital freight forwarding is becoming the standard for international logistics, providing not only cargo tracking automation but also enhancing the quality of customer experience in the B2B segment.

Logistics outsourcing and planning

Outsourcing logistics processes through a freight forwarder allows companies to focus on key business tasks, entrusting expertise in supply chain strategic planning to professionals.

The COREDO team has repeatedly calculated the cost and ROI of logistics solutions for clients from the EU and Asia, demonstrating that competent logistics outsourcing can increase the efficiency of the supply chain by up to 25% and significantly reduce operational risks.

The introduction of KPIs in logistics and regular process audits help maintain a high level of service and transparency.

As a result of such comprehensive work, your logistics processes become not only more efficient but also more transparent and manageable: which is directly related to the standards and compliance requirements in key markets of the EU, Asia, and Africa.

Freight forwarder: standards and compliance in the EU, Asia, Africa

Illustration for the section 'Freight forwarder: standards and compliance in the EU, Asia, Africa' in the article 'Freight forwarder in logistics – key functions'
In modern conditions, the activity of a freight forwarder requires strict adherence to standards and compliance both in the EU and in Asia and Africa. The necessity of international certification becomes a key factor for market expansion, increasing client trust, and long-term development of forwarding companies.

International standards certification

A freight forwarder is obliged to ensure compliance with international standards (compliance), including certification and licensing of forwarders, managing contracts with carriers, and controlling the quality of logistics services.
In the EU, certification according to FIATA and ISO standards is mandatory, as well as the presence of licenses for certain types of transportation. In Asia and Africa, requirements may vary, requiring a deep understanding of local regulatory features.
COREDO accompanies clients at all stages: from selecting transport service providers to checking compliance in international transportation.

Regional features of the EU, Asia, and Africa

Choosing a freight forwarder for international delivery in the EU, Asia, and Africa requires considering regulatory specifics, service costs, and digitization levels.

In the EU, there is a high level of digitization and strict compliance standards, in Asia: emphasis on multimodal transport and flexibility, in Africa – the high role of the human factor and limited digitization.
The COREDO team analyzes local requirements and helps clients choose experienced forwarders, minimizing risks, and providing support for international transportation.

Region Average service cost Service features Compliance/Licenses Recommendations
EU from 500 EUR/shipment High level of digitization, strict standards Mandatory FIATA, ISO certification Check for licenses, digital track & trace
Asia from 350 USD/shipment Focus on multimodal transportation, flexibility Differences by country, often require local partners Clarify local requirements, choose experienced forwarders
Africa from 400 USD/shipment Limited digitization, high role of the human factor Often no unified standards, experience is important Check reputation, use insurance

How to choose a freight forwarder

Illustration for the section 'How to choose a freight forwarder' in the article 'Freight forwarder in logistics – key functions'
Choosing a freight forwarder is a key step in ensuring sustainable and efficient international transportation. The right decision not only depends on timely delivery of goods but also on the overall safety and economic feasibility of the entire logistics. Let’s understand how to choose a reliable freight forwarder and what to pay special attention to.

How to choose a reliable freight forwarder

When choosing a freight forwarder for international delivery, I recommend paying attention to the following parameters:

  • experience in target regions (EU, Asia, Africa);
  • availability of modern digital tools and track & trace systems;
  • transparency of SLA (Service Level Agreement) and clear KPIs in logistics;
  • confirmed compliance with international standards and possession of licenses;
  • level of customer experience in B2B logistics.
A solution developed at COREDO for one of the clients included implementing a digital platform for controlling the quality of logistics services and automating interaction with transport service providers, which improved transparency and manageability of processes.

An effective choice of a freight forwarder becomes especially significant when considering its role in various stages of the logistics chain.

Freight forwarder in the logistics chain

Effective integration of a freight forwarder into an existing logistics chain requires:

  • integration of IT systems (ERP, EDI, track & trace);
  • automation of interaction with transport service providers;
  • change management and staff training for new processes.
COREDO’s experience shows that phased implementation of digital solutions and configuration of electronic document interchange allow minimizing risks associated with the human factor and increasing the speed of cargo processing.

Freight forwarding market trends 2025

Freight forwarding market trends for 2025 set new rules for all logistics chain participants. The rising influence of sustainable development and the implementation of innovative technologies become key factors shaping the industry’s future look and opening new prospects for business.

Innovative technologies for sustainable development

Digital freight forwarding, implementation of IoT and artificial intelligence, and the development of sustainable logistics are becoming key market trends.

COREDO is actively exploring opportunities for applying environmentally sustainable solutions and automating logistics processes to reduce carbon footprints and improve efficiency.

The implementation of digital tools for freight forwarders allows not only enhancing transparency but also meeting new market and regulator requirements.

How to choose a freight forwarder for business

A freight forwarder becomes a catalyst for scaling export operations, accelerating entry into new markets by optimizing logistics costs, managing warehouse inventories, and adapting to seasonal peaks.

In a COREDO case for a major EU exporter, the implementation of logistics outsourcing reduced time-to-market by 30% and increased ROI when entering Southeast Asian markets.

Competent strategic planning and ROI calculation when outsourcing logistics through a freight forwarder become the key to successful expansion.

Conclusions and recommendations for business

  • A freight forwarder: is not just a forwarder, but a strategic partner ensuring coordination of the logistics chain, risk management, compliance, and the implementation of digital solutions.
  • To minimize risks and increase efficiency, choose a forwarder with confirmed expertise, modern IT solutions, and transparent SLA.
  • The integration of a freight forwarder in supply chain management allows optimizing logistics costs, improving service levels, and accelerating entry into new markets.
  • Use a checklist when choosing a partner: experience, licenses, digital tools, process transparency, flexibility, and readiness to work in target regions.

Checklist for choosing a freight forwarder:

  • Verified experience in your industry and region
  • The availability of digital platforms for track & trace and electronic document interchange
  • Certification and licenses, compliance with international standards
  • Transparent SLA and clear KPIs
  • Flexibility in organizing multimodal transportation
  • Reputation and recommendations on the market
  • Willingness to integrate with your IT systems
  • Comprehensive approach to risk management and cargo insurance
The international logistics market is becoming increasingly complex and technological. Expert solutions implemented by the COREDO team allow our clients not only to meet new requirements but also to surpass competitors, turning logistics from a cost source into a strategic advantage.
According to PwC, more than 60% of corporate fraud cases in international transactions are related to insufficient due diligence of foreign counterparties and ineffective Due Diligence. In the context of globalization, when registering a business abroad becomes a strategic tool for growth and diversification, ignoring a comprehensive check of a foreign partner can lead to legal disputes, account blocking, sanctions risks, and even asset losses. Imagine: you invest in a new market, and after a few months, you face transaction blocking due to hidden beneficiaries or sanctions restrictions.

Why do even experienced entrepreneurs and financial directors make mistakes at this stage? Often, due to underestimating the complexity of compliance, the specifics of regional registries, AML (Anti-Money Laundering) and KYC procedures, as well as the lack of a transparent risk management system. How to avoid these pitfalls? How to ensure legal business support and minimize reputational and financial risks while entering foreign markets?

In this article, I, Nikita Veremeyev, share a practical guide based on the experience of COREDO in company registration, obtaining financial licenses and deal support in the EU, Asia, and the CIS. Here you will find not only a strategy but also step-by-step tools for checking a foreign partner – from basic checks to an in-depth assessment of corporate structure and financial stability. Read the article to the end to get a systematic approach and avoid critical errors at the stage of international expansion.

Foreign Counterparty Check

Illustration for the section 'Foreign Counterparty Check' in the article 'How to Check the Reliability of a Foreign Partner Before Registering a Business'

Checking a foreign partner is not a formality, but a multi-level process that protects the business from corporate fraud, sanctions risks, and ineffective partnerships. COREDO’s practice confirms: comprehensive verification of a foreign counterparty reduces the likelihood of legal disputes, ensures transaction transparency, and lays the foundation for long-term cooperation.

Collecting Information about the Company for Analysis

The first step is gathering and verifying basic information through international company registries (Company Registry), electronic catalogs (Europages, Open Ownership), and chambers of commerce. At this stage, it is important to obtain:

  • Certificate of Incorporation, Extract from Company Registry;
  • Articles of Association;
  • Information about directors, shareholders, registration address, and actual location.

The solution developed at COREDO involves the use of both official state registries and open public sources of information for preliminary data verification. It is important to request a notarized translation if the documents are in an irrelevant language.

Beneficiaries and Company Structure Check

The next step is analyzing the corporate structure of a foreign company and identifying the ultimate beneficial owners (Ultimate Beneficial Owners, UBO). This is critical for compliance with international AML standards and preventing risks associated with hidden owners or offshore structures.

The COREDO team has implemented projects where Orbis, Dun & Bradstreet, Open Ownership databases, and local court databases are used to verify the company’s beneficiaries. Special attention is given to:

  • Transparency of the corporate structure;
  • Verifying for nominee directors and shareholders;
  • Verification of company representatives’ authority.

For complex cases, for example, when working with Asian or offshore jurisdictions – we recommend using international databases and specialized services to identify hidden beneficiaries and track ownership structure changes.

How to Assess a Company’s Financial Stability

Partner’s financial stability: a key factor in long-term relations. Our experience at COREDO has shown that analyzing the financial statements of a foreign partner from open sources, the company’s credit history, and business activity data allows potential risks to be identified even before signing a contract.

Practical tools:

  • Request audited financial statements for the last 2-3 years;
  • Check credit rating through Dun & Bradstreet, Orbis;
  • Analyze transactional activity and payment discipline;
  • Assess business reputation through reviews and ratings in international databases.

Particular attention is paid to transactional monitoring and financial compliance analysis: this helps to identify anomalies related to money laundering or corporate fraud.

For a comprehensive picture of reliability, it is also important to check court disputes and current debt obligations.

Checking Court Disputes and Debts

Legal checks of foreign companies and analysis of litigation history are mandatory steps for assessing reputational risk and the legal cleanliness of a transaction. COREDO’s solutions include:

  • Monitoring court databases by the place of company registration;
  • Checking for debts and fines;
  • Analysis of anti-corruption audits and media mentions;
  • Assessing business reputation through international databases and public sources.
In one of COREDO’s cases for a client from the EU, a hidden legal dispute was uncovered, which could have led to asset blocking after the deal’s conclusion. Regular monitoring of legal and arbitration decisions is a mandatory part of the comprehensive check of a foreign counterparty.

Checking for Sanctions and Restrictions

Checking a foreign company for sanctions and restrictions: a key element of AML support and financial compliance. International sanctions lists (OFAC, EU Sanctions, UN Sanctions) and local databases are used.

COREDO’s practice confirms: to minimize risks, it is important not only to check the company but also all its beneficiaries and affiliated persons for inclusion in sanctions lists. Moreover, it is necessary to ensure that all licenses and permits are in place, especially when it comes to financial, crypto, or payment services.

Foreign Company Verification: Europe, Asia, Africa

Illustration for the section 'Foreign Company Verification: Europe, Asia, Africa' in the article 'How to Check the Reliability of a Foreign Partner Before Registering a Business'
Regional specifics require adapting approaches to counterpart verification. The solution developed by COREDO considers the peculiarities of the legal environment, registry availability, and transparency level in Europe, Asia, and Africa.

Company Verification in Europe

Europe has a developed Company Registry system and unified KYC and AML standards, enshrined in EU directives. For verifying a counterparty in Europe, the following are used:

  • Official registries (e.g., Czech Commercial Register, UK Companies House, Estonian e-Business Register);
  • European databases (Orbis, Open Ownership, Europages);
  • License and permit verification services.
Best KYC practices in the EU include mandatory beneficiary identification, corporate structure verification, and monitoring for AML directive compliance. In one of COREDO’s cases for a client from the Czech Republic, a discrepancy between the declared structure and actual beneficiaries was discovered, thereby avoiding reputational and financial losses.

Company Verification in Asia

Verifying a partner in Asia requires accounting for regional features of corporate law and specifics of local registries. In Asian countries (Singapore, Hong Kong, UAE), closed corporate structures are often used, and access to beneficiary information may be restricted.

COREDO’s team has implemented projects where comprehensive verification of a foreign counterparty in Asian countries applied:

  • Local Company Registry and specialized databases;
  • Verification of licenses and permits through official regulators (e.g., Monetary Authority of Singapore);
  • Analysis of corporate structure and identification of hidden beneficiaries using international services.

Special attention is paid to checking the legal cleanliness of transactions and analyzing risks associated with regional compliance features.

Company Check in Africa

Checking a company in Africa is associated with limited accessibility of public registries and a high proportion of offshore jurisdictions. The COREDO solution includes:

  • Using African registries and local chambers of commerce;
  • Checking business activity and tax discipline through open sources and international databases;
  • Risk analysis of offshore structures and compliance features.
An essential element is checking the legal cleanliness of the transaction and analyzing the presence of debts, which is especially important for markets with low transparency levels. Such a comprehensive strategy provides a reliable basis for the subsequent choice of tools for verifying foreign counterparties.

Foreign Counterparty Verification Tools

Illustration for the section 'Foreign Counterparty Verification Tools' in the article 'How to Check the Reliability of a Foreign Partner Before Registering a Business'
Effective verification of a foreign partner is impossible without the use of modern tools and services, ensuring access to up-to-date information and international compliance standards.

What are International Databases?

For comprehensive verification, international company registries (Open Ownership, Orbis, Europages), electronic company catalogs, and public information sources are used. These tools allow you to:
  • Check registration and status of the company;
  • Assess the transparency of the corporate structure;
  • Get information about beneficiaries and business activities.

In COREDO’s practice, Open Ownership and Orbis services are especially in demand for verifying corporate connections and history of ownership structure changes.

Website Check Services: Paid and Free

For checking court disputes, financial stability, and credit history, both paid and free services are used:

Service Type Capabilities
Dun & Bradstreet Paid Credit reports, financial history
Orbis Paid Corporate structure, beneficiaries
Open Ownership Free Connections and beneficiaries
Court databases Free Court disputes, arbitration decisions
Europages Free Basic company information

COREDO’s solution involves integrating multiple sources to obtain an objective picture and minimize verification errors.

Documents for Verification

To comprehensively verify a foreign company, it is necessary to request:
  • Certificate of Incorporation, Extract from Registry;
  • Articles of Association;
  • List of directors and shareholders;
  • Documents confirming representatives’ authority;
  • Financial statements for the last years;
  • Licenses and permits;
  • Certificates of no debts and legal disputes.

If necessary, notarized translation of documents and legalization for use in another jurisdiction.

AML and Legal Support in International Business Registration

Illustration for the section 'AML and Legal Support in International Business Registration' in the article 'How to Check the Reliability of a Foreign Partner Before Registering a Business'

AML (Anti-Money Laundering) services and legal business support are essential elements in international business registration and choice of a foreign partner. COREDO’s practice shows that integrating an internal control system and transactional monitoring allows not only to meet international AML standards but also to minimize financial and reputational risks.

AML Requirements: How to Comply?

To comply with international AML standards it is necessary to:

  • Implement an internal control system and regular transaction monitoring;
  • Conduct beneficiary identification and verification (KYC);
  • Check the company and affiliated individuals against international sanctions lists (OFAC, EU Sanctions);
  • Conduct regular anti-corruption audits and analyze funding sources.

COREDO’s solution includes the development of individual AML policies and client support at all verification stages.

Risk Verification in Business Processes

Integrating foreign counterpart verification into the company’s risk management strategy allows:

  • Increase partnership’s information security;
  • Minimize reputational and financial losses;
  • Ensure long-term business sustainability.
In COREDO’s practice, risk management strategies include anti-corruption audit, regular monitoring of business activity, and evaluating corporate structure transparency.

Mistakes in Foreign Partner Verification

Illustration for the section 'Mistakes in Foreign Partner Verification' in the article 'How to Check the Reliability of a Foreign Partner Before Registering a Business'
Common mistakes in checking a foreign partner:

  • Focusing only on official documents without analyzing court disputes and reputation;
  • Ignoring the verification of beneficiaries and corporate structure;
  • Insufficient attention to AML requirements and sanctions restrictions;
  • Lack of regular monitoring and information updates.
COREDO’s practice shows: to identify corporate fraud and minimize reputational risk, a comprehensive approach is needed, including multi-level verification and integration of results into the risk management system.

How to Check a Foreign Partner for Business

Checking a foreign partner for business: a critically significant stage before concluding a deal, as the risks of working with foreign companies are significantly higher than with domestic ones. To protect yourself and ensure the counterparty’s reliability, it is important to systematically go through the entire checklist for checking a foreign partner for business.

Foreign Partner Verification – Checklist

Verification Stage Tools/Documents COREDO Recommendations
Collection of Basic Information Company Registry, Europages, registry extract Request a notarized translation
Corporate Structure Verification Orbis, Open Ownership, Articles of Association Analyze change history
Beneficiary Identification Dun & Bradstreet, Open Ownership Check for nominee owners
Financial Stability Assessment Financial statements, credit reports Request audited reports
Check for Legal Disputes and Debts Court databases, no debt certificates Monitor regularly
Sanctions and Restrictions Check OFAC, EU Sanctions, local sanctions lists Check all affiliated individuals
Licenses and Permits Verification Official regulators, licenses Verify authenticity
Business Reputation Analysis International databases, reviews, ratings Use several sources
Representatives’ Authority Check Articles of Association, powers of attorney Cross-check with registries
AML Support Implement internal control system, KYC Regularly update procedures

Choosing Services and Documents

  • Use a combination of international and local registries for maximum information completeness.
  • Request originals and notarized copies of documents.
  • Implement regular monitoring of corporate structure and sanctions list changes.
  • Ensure verification integration into business processes through automation and staff training.

Foreign Partner Verification, FAQ

How to verify the authority of representatives of a foreign company?
Request Articles of Association and powers of attorney, and check information in Company Registry and Open Ownership.

What documents to request from a foreign company for reliability verification?
Registry extract, Articles of Association, list of directors and shareholders, financial statements, licenses, certificates of no debts and legal disputes.

How to verify the registration address and actual location?
Cross-check data from official registries with the actual office information, use electronic company catalogs and public sources.

What services to use for checking beneficiaries of a foreign company?
Orbis, Open Ownership, Dun & Bradstreet, local Company Registry.

How to check if a foreign company is under sanctions?
Use international sanctions lists (OFAC, EU Sanctions), and also local databases.

To move to the next section:
Let’s move on to the stages of comprehensive verification for international business registration.

Comprehensive Verification for International Business Registration

Comprehensive verification of a foreign partner is not just a stage of international business registration, but a strategic tool for risk minimization, transparency increase, and ensuring long-term company stability. COREDO’s experience proves that only the integration of multi-level verification, AML support, and legal business support allows avoiding critical errors, ensuring high ROI, and laying the foundation for successful international expansion. Amid growing compliance and information security requirements, a systematic approach to checking foreign counterparties becomes a key element of a company’s strategic security.

Islamic finance and banking services represent a unique system based on Sharia principles, excluding riba (usury), which forms a distinct approach to financial operations and investments. The formation and development of Islamic finance have been formed over centuries, closely related to the history of Muslim societies and modern economic realities.

History of Islamic Finance

Islamic finance is a system of financial relationships based on the principles of Islamic law (Sharia), where the key sources are the Quran and Sunnah. Unlike traditional banking, riba (interest), gharar (excessive uncertainty), and maysir (gambling) are prohibited here.

Decisions on the permissibility of financial products are made based on ijma (consensus of scholars) and fatwas (religious rulings), supervised by Islamic financial regulators and Sharia councils.

Practice at COREDO confirms: when structuring deals for clients from the EU and Asia, we always rely on international AAOIFI standards and local fatwas, which ensures not only legal purity but also trust from partners and investors.

Islamic Finance: Development and Scale

Today, Islamic banking operates in more than 80 countries, with the largest Islamic banks and investment funds in London, Dubai, Kuala Lumpur, and Singapore. Islamic fintech platforms (e.g., Wahed, Ethis) implement digital products, and international AAOIFI and IFSB standards shape unified approaches to compliance and auditing.

The COREDO team has implemented projects for launching Islamic investment funds in the EU and supporting sukuk (Islamic bonds) transactions for corporate clients from the Czech Republic and the UK.

Islamic Finance for Business: Why Necessary?

Islamic finance is not only a religious feature but also a tool for enhancing social and ethical sustainability, integrating ESG principles, and accessing fast-growing markets in the Middle East and Southeast Asia. Halal investments enable companies to raise capital from new categories of investors, minimize reputational risks, and meet responsible business standards. COREDO’s experience shows that competent integration of Islamic financial instruments into a business model increases partner trust and opens access to new financing sources.

Principles of Islamic Finance

Illustration for the section 'Principles of Islamic Finance' in the article 'Islamic finance – basic concepts and principles'
The principles of Islamic finance reflect Sharia requirements for fairness, transparency, and ethics in economic relations. These rules form a unique system where permissible and prohibited financial practices, such as riba and participation in risks, are strictly regulated.

Prohibition of Riba: Influence on Finance

Riba is a fundamental prohibition in Islamic finance. It is not only the refusal to charge and pay interest but also a fundamental change in the logic of financial relationships: income can only be earned through participation in real business, rather than passive capital provision. All Islamic financial instruments, from mudaraba (equity financing) to sukuk, are structured to eliminate riba and ensure a fair distribution of profits and losses.

Solutions developed at COREDO for European companies provide for a legal review of contracts and the structuring of Sharia-compliant transactions, allowing clients not only to meet Islamic law requirements but also to minimize tax and compliance risks.

Gharar and Maysir in Islamic Finance

Gharar is excessive uncertainty or ambiguity in the terms of a transaction, and maysir are elements of gambling and speculation. Both phenomena are considered haram (prohibited) and unacceptable in Islamic finance.

For business, this means that derivatives, options, futures, and any deals with inherently uncertain outcomes are prohibited. In practice, COREDO has carried out a Sharia compliance audit for an investment fund in Estonia, with particular attention paid to eliminating gharar in documentation and excluding maysir from the investment policy.

Social Responsibility and Partnership

Fairness and partnership are integral elements of Islamic finance. Companies are obliged to uphold social responsibility, maintain transparency, and avoid investments in prohibited sectors (alcohol, gambling, weapons). Islamic corporate governance and ESG integration are becoming standards for international companies working with Islamic banks and funds. COREDO’s practice confirms that the implementation of Islamic corporate governance principles contributes to long-term sustainability and reduces regulatory risks.

Islamic Financial Products for Business

Instrument Description Business Applicability Key Risks/Limitations
Mudaraba Equity financing based on partnership Funding startups, investment projects Requires transparency, joint management
Musharaka Joint investment, partnership Development of new lines, M&A Need for clear role distribution
Ijarah Leasing, asset rental Purchasing equipment, real estate Need to assess fair value
Murabaha Trade financing with deferred payment Procuring raw materials, goods Risk of non-compliance with Sharia if improperly structured
Sukuk Islamic bonds Raising capital, investments Strict Sharia compliance audit
Takaful Islamic insurance Asset protection, risk mitigation Limitations on insurable risks

Mudaraba and Musharaka: Differences and Essence

Mudaraba is equity financing where one party provides capital, and the other manages the project, with profits shared in a pre-agreed proportion. Musharaka is a partnership where all participants contribute and jointly manage the business. These instruments are particularly sought after for financing startups and investment projects in the EU and Asia. COREDO has demonstrated that mudaraba minimizes risks for the investor, while musharaka provides flexibility in business scaling.

Leasing or Trade Financing: Ijarah, Murabaha

Ijarah is the Islamic equivalent of leasing, where a company rents an asset with the option to purchase it. Murabaha is trade financing where the bank buys a product and sells it to the client with a pre-agreed markup.

Both instruments are actively used for financing equipment, real estate, and working capital. COREDO’s solutions for clients in Singapore and Dubai include comprehensive legal expertise and transaction support for ijarah and murabaha, allowing our clients to effectively manage assets and liquidity.

Sukuk and Islamic Investment Funds

Sukuk are Islamic bonds backed by real assets, where income is earned not from interest but from a share in the profit from using the asset. Islamic investment funds offer Sharia-compliant collective investment tools. The COREDO team has supported the issuance of sukuk for a technology company in the UK, ensuring not only compliance with AAOIFI standards but also transparency for investors.

Thus, Islamic financial instruments encompass not only investments but also Sharia-compliant insurance.

What is Sharia Insurance?

Takaful is Islamic insurance based on principles of mutual assistance and shared risk distribution. Unlike traditional insurance, it lacks elements of gharar and maysir.

For international companies, takaful becomes an effective tool for asset protection and risk management. COREDO’s practice includes Sharia compliance audits of insurance products and the implementation of takaful for corporate clients in the EU and Asia.

Sharia Compliance in Islamic Finance

Sharia compliance in Islamic finance is a control and assessment system ensuring that all financial products and operations comply with Islamic law requirements. This approach requires not only understanding the peculiarities of the Islamic economy but also detailed structuring of each transaction following Sharia principles, highlighting the significance of the following aspects of the process.

Sharia Structuring of Deals

Structuring deals according to Sharia requires comprehensive auditing, Islamic Due Diligence, and obtaining a fatwa from an accredited Sharia council. For this, COREDO develops individual verification algorithms, including analysis of funding sources, legal review of contracts, and interaction with Islamic financial regulators.

Islamic Compliance and Auditing for Business

Compliance in Islamic finance is not only about meeting formal requirements but also about constant Sharia compliance auditing, appointing an Islamic compliance officer, and integrating AAOIFI standards into corporate governance. COREDO’s solutions allow companies to build transparent processes, reduce regulatory risks, and ensure partner and investor trust.

AAOIFI and IFSB Standards in Islamic Finance

AAOIFI (Accounting and Auditing Organization for Islamic Financial Institutions) and IFSB (Islamic Financial Services Board) set international accounting, auditing, and corporate governance standards in Islamic finance.

Adherence to these standards is a mandatory condition for entering international markets and attracting investments. COREDO’s experience shows that integrating AAOIFI standards into a company’s corporate policy accelerates deal approval and enhances transparency.

Islamic Finance: Opportunities and Risks for Business

Illustration for the section 'Islamic Finance: Opportunities and Risks for Business' in the article 'Islamic finance – basic concepts and principles'
Islamic finance opens new opportunities for business, offering instruments based on principles of fairness and financial sustainability, while also posing specific risk management requirements. For companies considering Islamic banking, it is important to understand not only growth potential but also the specifics of risks arising from unique religious and legal constraints.

Islamic Banking for Business in the EU and Asia

Islamic banking for corporate clients in the EU and Asia combines traditional banking services with Sharia requirements: current accounts, financing, investment products, and asset management. The implementation of Islamic financial technologies (fintech) allows for compliance automation, accelerated Sharia compliance auditing, and operational transparency. In practice, COREDO has implemented projects integrating Islamic financial products for companies in the Czech Republic and Singapore, enabling clients to enter new markets and attract halal investments.

Successful Cases of Islamic Finance Worldwide

In 2023, COREDO supported the launch of an Islamic investment fund in Estonia with capital raised from Gulf countries. Thanks to comprehensive expertise and the implementation of AAOIFI standards, the fund not only passed a Sharia compliance audit but also became an example of successfully integrating Islamic ethics into an investment strategy.

In Africa, COREDO’s practice involved structuring mudaraba transactions for agribusiness startups, ensuring sustainable development and business social responsibility.

Nevertheless, even with the successful implementation of Sharia standards and socially responsible strategies, companies face a number of unique challenges and risks, which will be discussed further.

Challenges and Risks for Companies

The implementation of Islamic finance comes with a range of challenges: compliance complexity, the need for constant auditing, a limited choice of Islamic banks in certain jurisdictions, as well as transparency and reporting requirements. Risk management in Islamic finance requires not only legal expertise but also a deep understanding of Sharia specifics. COREDO’s solutions include developing individual risk management strategies, tax planning, and supporting transactions at all stages.

Integration of Islamic Finance into Business

Illustration for the section 'Integration of Islamic Finance into Business' in the article 'Islamic Finance – basic concepts and principles'
The integration of Islamic finance into business opens new opportunities for companies seeking honest and transparent financing based on principles of partnership and ethics. To effectively utilize these tools, it is important to understand how to choose an Islamic bank and suitable financial products.

How to Choose an Islamic Bank and Products

  • Define strategic goals: market expansion, attracting halal investments, ESG transformation.
  • Conduct Islamic due diligence of selected banks and financial products.
  • Request a fatwa and Sharia compliance audit from accredited councils.
  • Appoint an Islamic compliance officer and implement regular audit procedures.
  • Integrate Islamic financial products (sukuk, mudaraba, ijarah) into the corporate structure.

How to Ensure Sharia Compliance?

  • Develop internal compliance policies in Islamic finance.
  • Implement regular Sharia compliance audits and AAOIFI-standard reporting.
  • Ensure transaction transparency and exclude prohibited elements (riba, gharar, maysir).
  • Leverage COREDO’s experience for deal structuring and regulator interaction.

ESG and Islamic Finance: Integration

  • Include ESG criteria in investment policy and corporate governance.
  • Develop a system for assessing the social and ethical sustainability of projects.
  • Integrate Islamic ethics into investment decisions and asset management.
  • Adopt COREDO’s best practices for integrating ESG principles into Islamic financial strategies.

Conclusions and Business Advice

Illustration for the section 'Conclusions and Business Advice' in the article 'Islamic finance – basic concepts and principles'
Islamic finance is not only an alternative to traditional banking but also a strategic tool for international business. The principles of Islamic finance ensure transparency, fairness, and sustainability, while Islamic banks and financial products offer new opportunities for investment attraction and risk management. Practical steps, developed based on COREDO’s experience, enable companies to minimize legal and compliance risks, integrate ESG, and enter new markets. For successful transformation, it is crucial to ensure constant Sharia compliance audits, use international standards, and engage professional consultants.

Questions About Islamic Finance For Business

Illustration for the section 'Questions About Islamic Finance For Business' in the article 'Islamic finance – basic concepts and principles'

What are the strategic advantages of Islamic finance for international business?
Islamic finance allows attracting capital from new sources, ensures ESG compliance, and reduces regulatory risks due to transparency and social responsibility.
How to ensure Sharia compliance when entering Middle Eastern markets?

You need to conduct a Sharia compliance audit, obtain a fatwa, and integrate AAOIFI standards into corporate procedures.

What risks and limitations exist when using Islamic financial instruments?

Key risks include compliance complexity, a limited choice of banks, the need for constant auditing and transparency.

How to evaluate the return on investment (ROI) in Islamic financial products?

ROI is calculated based on the share of profit earned through partnership or investments, considering the absence of interest and prohibited income.

What are the corporate governance requirements in Islamic finance?

The integration of fairness, transparency, social responsibility, and regular Sharia compliance audits is required.

How to scale business using Islamic financing?

Use tools such as mudaraba, musharaka, sukuk, and integrate Islamic banking into the corporate structure, considering local and international standards.

What are the international standards and regulators for Islamic finance?

The key standards are AAOIFI, IFSB. Regulators include central banks of Islamic countries, Sharia councils, and international organizations.

How to integrate ESG principles into an Islamic financial strategy?

Include ESG criteria in investment decisions, corporate governance, and reporting, leveraging Islamic ethics and AAOIFI standards.

If you plan to implement Islamic finance into your business model or enter new markets, the COREDO team is ready to offer comprehensive support – from strategic planning to transaction facilitation and Sharia compliance auditing.

In 2023, according to the European Commission, more than 32% of international companies encountered legal difficulties at the very first stage of entering new markets, and direct losses from legal errors and unaccounted regulatory risks exceeded 21 billion euros. Even more telling: according to the World Bank Doing Business analysis, companies that ignore compliance and substance requirements are 2.7 times more likely to face account blocks or sanction restrictions.

Why are even experienced entrepreneurs, successfully operating in local markets, vulnerable when expanding internationally? What legal traps await businesses when registering a company abroad, opening accounts, obtaining licenses, and integrating with international payment systems? How to ensure not just legal protection of your business but also its sustainability, reputation, and freedom to scale?

In practice, the COREDO team has encountered dozens of cases where subtle nuances of corporate structuring, compliance, and tax planning became critical to the success or failure of an international project. In this article, I will thoroughly discuss how strategically and tactically to build legal protection for a business when entering new markets: from jurisdiction selection to supporting M&A deals and integrating ESG compliance. Read till the end: you will get answers to the most pressing questions and practical tools that will minimize legal risks and ensure the long-term sustainability of your business.

Legal Protection of Business in a New Market

Illustration for the section 'Legal Protection of Business in a New Market' in the article 'How to Ensure Legal Protection of Business When Entering New Markets'

Legal protection of business in a new market requires a careful approach to new rules and regulatory nuances faced by companies during international expansion. Understanding potential legal risks and a competent legal strategy are key to a successful entry and sustainable business development abroad.

Legal Risks in International Expansion

International expansion is always accompanied by legal turbulence: differences in regulations, sanction compliance, requirements for corporate transparency, and risks of being blacklisted by the EU and FATF. Common errors include:

  • Ignoring local substance requirements (real presence), leading to tax claims and account blocks.
  • Underestimating sanction restrictions, especially for companies from the CIS working with European and Asian markets.
  • Lack of systematic legal risk management, for example, an opaque ownership structure or neglected KYC requirements.

In one of COREDO’s cases, when a technology company entered the Southeast Asian market, the lack of prior reputational check of a local partner led to the blocking of all payments due to its connection with individuals on the OFAC sanctions list. Only immediate background checks and restructuring of contractual relations allowed restoring payments and avoiding litigation.

Structuring and Asset Protection Abroad

Corporate structuring is the key to asset protection abroad and minimizing legal risks. The use of corporate holdings, SPV structures, and captive trading companies are not only tax optimization tools but also effective mechanisms for protecting trade secrets and managing conflicts of interest.

Implementing such structures requires deep knowledge of international contract law, Double Tax Treaties, and the specifics of corporate taxation in chosen jurisdictions. COREDO’s practice confirms: a correctly structured holding not only protects assets from external claims but also boosts the company’s business rating, easing access to international financial institutions.

Where to Register a Business Abroad?

Illustration for the section 'Where to Register a Business Abroad?' in the article 'How to Ensure Legal Protection of Business When Entering New Markets'

The question “Where to register a business abroad?” is relevant for entrepreneurs aiming for growth and global scaling of their business. Choosing a country for registration directly influences the tax burden, access to foreign markets, and the ability to integrate with international payment systems. Next, we will consider the main features of opening a company in the EU, Asia, and Africa.

Where to Open a Company in the EU, Asia, or Africa

The selection of jurisdiction for business determines not just the tax burden but also the level of compliance requirements, access to banking services, and risks of being included in sanction lists. Key criteria include:

  • Tax rate and availability of Double Tax Treaties
  • Substance requirements and corporate transparency
  • Business rating (Doing Business) and jurisdiction reputation
  • Banking compliance specifics and AML procedures

Below is a comparative table of popular jurisdictions:

Jurisdiction Taxes Substance Requirements Bank Accounts Blacklist Risks Compliance Features
Cyprus Medium High Moderately difficult Low Strict AML/KYC
Singapore Low High Easy Very low Transparency, ESG
UAE Low Medium Easy Low Flexible requirements
Hong Kong Medium Medium Difficult Medium Strict KYC

COREDO’s experience shows: for technology and fintech companies, Singapore and the UAE remain optimal payment hubs, while for holding structures with a European orientation, Cyprus and Luxembourg are preferable.

Substance and Business Transparency Requirements

Since 2020, EU and Asian regulators have tightened substance requirements: the presence of an office, employees, management infrastructure. Non-compliance leads to loss of tax benefits and the risk of being deemed a shell company.

A crucial aspect is corporate transparency and disclosure of beneficial ownership. An example from COREDO’s practice: when structuring a holding for an international trading group in the Czech Republic, implementing a corporate transparency system with registration of all beneficiaries allowed not just passing bank Due Diligence, but also avoiding tax authority claims regarding tax residence.

AML and Compliance: How to Avoid Account Blocking

Illustration for the section 'AML and Compliance: How to Avoid Account Blocking' in the article 'How to Ensure Legal Protection of Business When Entering New Markets'

Today, AML and compliance are key tools for protecting businesses from account blocking and sanctions. Proper implementation of AML procedures and adherence to KYC help international companies minimize risks associated with suspicious transactions and regulatory requirements.

AML and KYC for International Companies

Modern international AML/KYC standards require not only client and partner verification but also ongoing transaction monitoring, implementation of automated compliance procedures, and conducting due diligence on suppliers. KYC specifics in the EU, Asia, and Africa vary in depth of checks, but everywhere the key importance lies in:

  • Documentary confirmation of source of funds
  • Checks against sanction lists and PEP
  • Compliance with automatic tax information exchange (CRS) requirements

In one of COREDO’s projects on supporting the registration of a payment company in Estonia, implementing a comprehensive KYC platform allowed not only passing the licensing review but also reducing the risk of account blocking in European banks.

In conditions of constantly tightening regulatory requirements, it is especially important to understand what mistakes can lead to being blacklisted by the EU or FATF, and how to avoid them.

How Not to Get Blacklisted by the EU and FATF

Getting blacklisted by the EU or FATF can paralyze international payments and lead to asset blocking. To minimize these risks, it is important to:

  • Conduct regular background checks on all key counterparties
  • Implement sanction compliance at the corporate policy level
  • Use specialized IT solutions for transaction monitoring

The solution developed by COREDO for one of the export-import holdings included automated verification of all new counterparties against global sanction databases, which allowed avoiding blacklists and maintaining access to international payment systems.

International Tax Planning

Illustration for the section 'International Tax Planning' in the article 'How to Ensure Legal Protection of Business When Entering New Markets'

International tax planning allows companies and investors to efficiently manage tax liabilities when entering foreign markets. A competent approach to ATP helps reduce the tax burden legally and take into account all potential risks.

Tax Risks When Entering Foreign Markets

Effective international tax planning is based on using Double Tax Treaties, correctly determining tax residence and considering CFC (Controlled Foreign Companies) rules. It is important to:

  • Structure the holding in accordance with treaties between countries
  • Ensure compliance with substance requirements
  • Conduct regular legal audits of international operations

In the COREDO case of restructuring a group of companies with offices in the EU and Asia, implementing an SPV structure in Singapore reduced tax burden by 18% and ensured legitimacy of cross-border transfers.

How to Prepare for CRS Reporting

CRS (Common Reporting Standard) obliges financial institutions to automatically transmit tax information about non-resident accounts. To prepare a company for CRS, it is necessary to:

  • Ensure correct determination of all beneficiaries’ tax residence
  • Implement corporate transparency procedures
  • Collect and update the document package for banks and regulators

COREDO’s practice showed that companies that pre-implemented internal CRS procedures did not face account blocking and tax authority claims when scaling the business.

Opening Accounts and Integrating with Payment Systems

Illustration for the section 'Opening Accounts and Integrating with Payment Systems' in the article 'How to Ensure Legal Protection of Business When Entering New Markets'

Opening accounts and integrating with payment systems are key stages for launching and scaling a business working with international transactions. This process includes both selecting a suitable bank or fintech platform and implementing modern payment services for customer convenience and company efficiency.

Opening Accounts in Foreign Banks and Fintech

Opening an account in a foreign bank is one of the most challenging procedures for international business. The requirements in the EU, Asia, and Africa differ in document volume, depth of KYC, and application review periods.

Region Main Documents Opening Period KYC/AML Features
EU Charter, proof of substance, beneficiary KYC 2–6 weeks Strict AML, background checks
Asia Charter, business plan, licenses, KYC 1–4 weeks Focus on source of funds
Africa Charter, KYC, address confirmation 2–8 weeks Flexible approach, but often manual check

The COREDO team implemented integration with fintech platforms for clients working in e-commerce and IT, significantly speeding up settlements and reducing currency operation costs.

Currency Regulation and Operations

Currency legislation in the EU and Asia requires considering the specifics of cross-border payments, controlling the source of funds, and complying with operation limits. Key advice for managing currency risks:

  • Use multi-currency accounts and payment platforms
  • Implement automated systems for exchange rate and limit control
  • Conduct regular legal audits of currency operations

Implementing such solutions in COREDO projects allowed clients to reduce conversion costs and avoid fines for violating currency regulations.

Brand and Intellectual Property Protection

Brand and intellectual property protection: this is a strategic task for any business aiming to retain its competitive edge and market exclusivity. Trademark and patent registration legally secures rights to unique developments, preventing unauthorized use by third parties.

Trademark and Patent Registration Worldwide

Intellectual property protection when entering a market starts with registering trademarks and patents in target jurisdictions. Features include:

  • In the EU – a unified registration system through EUIPO
  • In Asia – national procedures, often with mandatory localization
  • In Africa – regional organizations (ARIPO, OAPI)

A typical mistake: delaying registration until sales launch. COREDO’s experience shows: prior registration of brand and patents reduces the risk of litigation and saves up to 60% on rights protection costs.

Protection of Trade Secrets and Reputation

Tools for protecting trade secrets include NDA, internal information access policies, background checks for hiring and partner selection. In one of COREDO’s cases, implementing a system of reputational checks revealed hidden connections between top management of a partner company and offshore entities, preventing commercial information leaks and reputational losses.

M&A and Cross-Border Deal Support

M&A and cross-border deal support requires a deep understanding of legal, financial, and organizational aspects, especially for projects involving foreign jurisdictions. Quality legal support minimizes risks and ensures successful execution of even the most complex and large-scale deals.

Legal Support for M&A Abroad

M&A deals abroad require thorough due diligence, contract law analysis, sanction, and tax risk assessment. In COREDO’s practice, supporting M&A in the EU included:

  • Checking ownership and beneficiary structures
  • Analyzing corporate agreements
  • Assessing compliance procedures in both jurisdictions

This prevented legal consequences of business scaling and ensured asset integration without blocks.

Further stages of support often include interaction with foreign authorities, dispute resolution, and unlocking assets.

Unblocking Foreign Assets and Disputes

Unblocking foreign assets requires a comprehensive approach: from negotiations with banks and regulators to participating in international litigation. COREDO’s solutions include:

  • Legal audit of blockage reasons
  • Developing a strategy for interaction with regulators
  • Supporting court proceedings in the EU and Asia

In one case, thanks to competent work with trust managers and local lawyers, access to assets was restored within 4 months.

ESG Compliance for Legal Entities

ESG compliance for legal entities becomes a key element of responsible and sustainable business, reflecting the requirements for environmental, social, and governance aspects of a company’s activities. Implementing ESG standards helps organizations not only comply with regulatory norms but also create competitive advantages in the modern business environment.

ESG Standards in Company Strategy

ESG compliance (Environment, Social, and Governance standards) becomes a mandatory element for companies focused on long-term sustainability and investment appeal. Implementing ESG policies allows:

  • Improving business rating
  • Reducing legal and reputational risks
  • Ensuring compliance with international investor requirements

In COREDO projects, integrating ESG compliance often becomes a key factor for successful fundraising and market entry.

ROI of Legal Support for Expansion

Evaluating the effectiveness of legal support can be done through the following ROI metrics:

  • Reduction in the number of legal incidents
  • Tax and fine savings
  • Speed of market entry and payment system integration
  • Resilience of corporate structure to external risks

Strategic foresight of risks and regular audits of legal processes not only minimize losses but also increase business value during scaling.

Practical Advice for Entrepreneurs

  • Conduct comprehensive due diligence on the market and partners
  • Select a jurisdiction considering tax, compliance, and substance requirements
  • Register trademarks and patents before market entry
  • Implement automated compliance and AML/KYC procedures
  • Regularly update documents for banks and regulators
  • Conduct legal audits of international operations at least once a year
  • Assesses reputational risks and integrate ESG standards

Choosing a legal partner is critical: pay attention to their experience in supporting international business, expertise in selected jurisdictions, and ability to work with complex structures.

Frequently Asked Questions from Entrepreneurs

How to choose a jurisdiction for business registration?
Evaluate the tax rate, substance requirements, business rating, access to banking services, and sanction risks. Use comparative tables and consult COREDO experts for individual analysis.

What documents are needed to open an account in a foreign bank?
Typically: charter, substance documents, beneficiary KYC, business plan, address confirmation, licenses (if necessary).

How to ensure compliance and avoid sanctions?
Implement regular background checks, automated AML/KYC procedures, track changes in sanction lists.

How to protect intellectual property?
Register trademarks and patents in target jurisdictions before market entry, implement NDA and internal trade secret protection policies.

Main Conclusions and Recommendations

  • Legal protection of a business entering new markets is not just about registering a company abroad but a comprehensive system for managing legal, tax, and reputational risks.
  • Critically important are: jurisdiction selection, compliance with substance and corporate transparency requirements, implementation of modern compliance and AML procedures.
  • Regular legal audits, integration of ESG standards, and strategic foresight of risks ensure long-term sustainability and investment attractiveness of the business.
  • To minimize legal risks and ensure successful international expansion, use checklists, automated tools, and consult experts with confirmed international business support experience.

If you plan to enter new markets or encounter legal issues when scaling your business, the COREDO team is ready to offer strategic solutions based on deep expertise and practical experience in the EU, Asia, and Africa.

Jurisdiction Capital Terms Features
EU €125,000+ 3-6 months MiFID II, ESMA, strict AML/KYC
Singapore SGD 250,000+ 2-5 months MAS, digital procedures, fintech integration
South Africa ZAR 1 million+ 4-9 months FSCA, local partners, focus on ESG
Regulatory requirements for compliance and AML/KYC vary depending on the jurisdiction, determining reporting and control at subsequent stages.

Compliance and AML for Dealers: Regulation

Illustration for the section 'Compliance and AML for Dealers: Regulation' in the article 'Securities Dealer License - Rules and Features'

Compliance and AML for dealers are an integral part of modern regulation aimed at preventing risks associated with financial crimes and money laundering. For successful and legal operations, dealers need to consider both basic standards and regularly updated AML and KYC requirements. In the following sections, we will look more closely at the key standards and requirements that market participants face.

AML and KYC: Standards and Requirements

Illustration for the section 'AML and KYC: Standards and Requirements' in the article 'Securities Dealer License - Rules and Features'

Combating money laundering (AML) and implementing KYC: mandatory elements for all dealer companies. International standards (FATF, ESMA, MAS) require multi-level customer verification, automation of due diligence, and regular updates of anti-corruption control procedures. In the EU and Singapore, regulators conduct unscheduled inspections, assessing not only the formal existence of procedures but also their actual effectiveness.
The experience of COREDO has shown that the integration of automated solutions for AML not only meets the requirements but also speeds up client onboarding, reducing operational costs.
Thus, competent implementation of AML and KYC lays a solid foundation for further control of dealer activities and interaction with regulators.

Dealer Control and Reporting to the Regulator

Illustration for the section 'Dealer Control and Reporting to the Regulator' in the article 'Securities Dealer License - Rules and Features'

Internal control procedures for dealers include: regular internal audits, preparation for regulatory audits, compliance automation, dealer reporting to the regulator, and implementation of incident management systems.
In the EU, quarterly transaction reporting is required, in Asia: mandatory internal control audits, in Africa, focus on preventing conflicts of interest and corporate governance.
The practice of COREDO confirms: transparent reporting and timely updates of procedures are the key to successfully passing any inspections.

Automation of Compliance in Fintech and Regtech

Illustration for the section 'Automation of Compliance in Fintech and Regtech' in the article 'Securities Dealer License - Rules and Features'

Modern digital platforms for dealer activities allow automating compliance processes, integrating AML/KYC modules, and conducting internal audits in real-time. The implementation of new technologies (fintech, regtech) reduces human error, speeds up data processing, and increases the profitability of dealer operations.
In one of COREDO’s projects for a client from the EU, a compliance automation system was implemented, which reduced the report preparation time from 10 to 2 days and improved the quality of internal control.
“86% of international companies planning to register a business in Europe by 2025 face delays or rejections when opening bank accounts due to sanction restrictions and tightened compliance,” – these are the findings of the latest report by the European Banking Federation. This statistic is not just impressive; it is a game-changer for anyone considering an EU market entry strategy or diversifying corporate accounts abroad. Today, EU sanctions are not just a foreign policy tool but a factor that radically affects daily business processes: from registering a company in Europe to obtaining a financial activity license and managing international payments.
The question every owner or CFO should ask themselves: “Is my business ready for the new realities: account blockages, secondary sanctions, tightened KYC and AML, the need for transparent corporate structuring?” In an environment where geopolitics dictates banking requirements and compliance becomes an ongoing process, standard solutions no longer work.

In this article, I will detail how EU sanctions and international regulations transform account opening and business licensing in Europe, the strategic and tactical mistakes companies often make, and the practical tools that really work to minimize risks. Drawing on COREDO’s practice, I will show how to build a sustainable business model even under sanction pressure. If you not only want to survive but scale your business in Europe in 2025, read on.

EU Sanctions for Business: Consequences 2025

Illustration for the section “EU Sanctions for Business: Consequences 2025” in the article “Impact of sanctions on account opening and business licensing in Europe”

In 2025, EU sanctions for business are becoming more complex, affecting a wide range of economic and industry sectors. For entrepreneurs, these measures mean new challenges and a revision of usual operations as the consequences affect both market access and the use of key technologies and financial instruments.

Types of Sanctions for Entrepreneurs

Today’s EU sanctions are a multi-level system of restrictions, including both sectoral and targeted measures against legal and physical entities, as well as secondary sanctions against companies cooperating with sanctioned entities. In 2025, financial sanctions against legal entities, limiting access to banking services, international payment systems, and business licensing in Europe, become particularly significant. Geopolitics directly affects bank accounts: banks and fintech companies are forced to implement strict currency controls, account blockages, and asset freezes at the slightest suspicion of sanction regime violations.
In practice, the COREDO team has repeatedly encountered situations where even indirect mentions of connections with sanctioned jurisdictions led to a refusal to open a corporate account abroad or block an existing account. This requires businesses to have not only deep expertise in Due Diligence but also constant financial monitoring of all transactions.

Consequences of Sanctions for Business in Europe

The long-term consequences of sanctions go far beyond the current restrictions. The legal risks of doing business in the EU are significantly increasing: companies are forced to invest in managing reputational risks, strategic planning for EU market entry, and building transparent corporate structures. COREDO’s practice confirms: successful scaling is possible only with the integration of compliance risk management into the company’s development strategy.
In the face of sectoral sanctions and the threat of secondary sanctions, it is critically important not only to comply with regulator’s requirements but also to be able to respond promptly to changes in the sanction landscape. This requires regular audits of the corporate structure and constant interaction with international legal consultants.

Opening a Bank Account in Europe under Sanctions

Illustration for the section “Opening a Bank Account in Europe under Sanctions” in the article “Impact of sanctions on account opening and business licensing in Europe”

Opening a bank account in Europe under sanctions is becoming an increasingly complex task due to the tightening of restrictions and the emergence of new requirements for financial operations. In 2025, additional EU rules come into effect that significantly change the procedure for interacting with banks for clients from countries under sanctions.

New Banking Rules in the EU 2025

In 2025, opening a bank account in Europe for international business is associated with a number of new requirements. Banks have strengthened preliminary compliance audits, implemented enhanced client identification procedures (CIP), and require detailed disclosure of the sources of funds. For non-residents and companies from the CIS and Asia, the difficulties in opening an account are exacerbated by the need to provide a full set of documents, including not only corporate reporting but also biographies of directors and shareholders, proof of tax residency, and a detailed business plan.
The solution developed in COREDO involves step-by-step preparation of documents and preliminary audit of the corporate structure, allowing to minimize the risk of rejection during the application review by the bank. Special attention is paid to justifying the legality of fund origin and the transparency of the corporate structure.

Beneficiary Verification and PEP KYC Standards

KYC and AML standards in Europe have been tightened: banks conduct in-depth verification of beneficiaries, paying special attention to PEP (Politically Exposed Persons) status, connections with sanctioned regions, and operation history. In 2025, requirements for disclosing information about beneficiaries became even stricter: banks require not only passport data but also proof of the legality of funds and an analysis of corporate ties for secondary sanction risks.
COREDO’s experience shows that successful compliance can only occur if a pre-prepared package of documents and a transparent ownership structure are in place. In several cases, the COREDO team conducted a preliminary compliance audit, allowing clients to avoid account blockages and speed up the opening process.

Account Blocking and Asset Freeze

Account blocking in European banks and asset freeze: a reality for companies that do not meet the new compliance requirements or fall under sanctions. In response, international business is actively seeking alternative payment tools: digital banks, fintech solutions, international payment systems, and financial intermediaries capable of ensuring international payment processing under sanction pressure.
COREDO’s practice confirms the effectiveness of using multi-banking and diversifying payment channels. In a recent case, a client was able to maintain operational stability by integrating digital banks and alternative payment platforms, minimizing account blockage risks.

Diversification and Multi-Banking for Business

Diversification of banking partners and multi-banking become key financial control tools in the EU. Strategic planning for EU market entry now includes assessing banks for sanction resilience, evaluating alternative jurisdictions for business, and building reserve payment routes. Solutions implemented by the COREDO team allow clients not only to reduce account blockage risks but also to increase flexibility in managing international payments.

Business Licensing in Europe – New Requirements

Illustration for the section “Business Licensing in Europe - New Requirements” in the article “Impact of sanctions on account opening and business licensing in Europe”

Licensing of business in Europe is continuously evolving, and by 2025 new requirements are introduced for companies operating in the EU. This affects both traditional sectors and financial and digital services, emphasizing the importance of a thorough comparison of licensing conditions in individual European Union countries.

Licensing in the EU: Country Comparison 2025

Business licensing in Europe in 2025 is not only about complying with EU and FATF regulatory requirements but also proving tax residency, confirming the center of financial interests, and providing corporate reporting according to international standards. Licensing specifics in different jurisdictions (e.g., Czech Republic, Cyprus, Estonia, United Kingdom) require deep analysis: some focus on economic citizenship and physical presence, others on corporate structure transparency and source of funds.
COREDO’s experience shows that successful licensing of financial companies in the EU is only possible with thorough preparation and adaptation of the corporate structure to the specific jurisdiction’s requirements.

How to Prepare a Business for Compliance

A transparent corporate structure is the key factor for successful compliance and obtaining a license. The preliminary audit of the corporate structure, implemented by the COREDO team, includes analyzing connections between shareholders, checking beneficial ownership, assessing secondary sanction risks, and preparing a full package of documents for licensing.
International corporate structuring and implementing compliance risk management procedures allow reducing the likelihood of licensing refusal and ensuring long-term financial transparency of the business.

Moving on to the question of the license, let’s review the necessary documents and the procedure for obtaining them in 2025.

License: Documents and Procedure for Obtaining in 2025

In 2025, obtaining a license for financial activities in the EU requires an expanded package of documents: corporate reporting, proof of source of funds, biographies of directors and shareholders, business plan, documents confirming tax residency, and financial interest center. Banks and regulators require completion of preliminary compliance audits and implementation of client identification procedures (CIP).
The COREDO team accompanies clients at all stages of document preparation, ensuring compliance with international standards and regulatory requirements.

How to Reduce Business Risks Due to Sanctions

Illustration for the section “How to Reduce Business Risks Due to Sanctions” in the article “Impact of sanctions on account opening and business licensing in Europe”

Sanction pressure on business is constantly increasing, raising financial and operational risks. To effectively reduce business risks due to sanctions, it is important to understand typical mistakes made when opening accounts and obtaining licenses that can lead to operation blockages and additional checks.

Mistakes When Opening Accounts and Licensing

The most common mistakes: insufficient document preparation, non-transparent ownership structure, lack of due diligence and financial monitoring, and attempts to hide connections with sanctioned regions. COREDO’s experience shows that even minor discrepancies in documents or shareholder biographies can lead to account opening or licensing refusal.
The solution is implementing multi-level document quality control and regular corporate structure audits.
Thus, only a systematic approach to document preparation and verification can minimize risks and increase the chances of successful operations in the EU.

Compliance for Business in the EU: How to Prepare

Compliance for business in the EU is not a one-time procedure, but a continuous process, including preliminary compliance audits, AML/KYC internal regulation implementation, automatic data exchange, and monitoring adherence to banking secrecy. Managing reputational risk requires constant monitoring of changes in the sanction and regulatory field.
At COREDO, we implement comprehensive solutions that allow clients not only to pass complex compliance but also to maintain a high level of financial transparency on an ongoing basis.

Alternative Payment Tools 2025

Amidst sanction pressure, alternative payment tools prove effective: digital banks, international payment systems, fintech solutions, and financial intermediaries capable of ensuring currency control and flexibility in international payments. The selection of alternative jurisdictions for business reduces account blockage risks and ensures the stability of international operations.
The COREDO team has implemented several projects integrating digital banks and multi-banking, allowing clients to maintain operational activity even when accounts in traditional banks are blocked.
A comprehensive approach to selecting tools and jurisdictions can significantly enhance business resilience: further, we will consider practical steps to reduce blockage and sanction risks.

How to Reduce the Risk of Blockage and Sanctions

Minimizing the risk of account blockages and secondary sanctions requires strategic planning, implementing compliance risk management, and diversifying banking partners. COREDO’s practice confirms that only a comprehensive approach, including sanction status analysis, corporate structure audits, and selecting resilient banking partners, allows reducing risks to a minimum level.

Practical Tips for Entrepreneurs

Illustration for the section “Practical Tips for Entrepreneurs” in the article “Impact of sanctions on account opening and business licensing in Europe”

Practical tips for entrepreneurs in 2025 are especially relevant; in a rapidly changing market, it is important to remain flexible and ready for new challenges. The following insights will help prepare for future changes and effectively develop your business, relying on real trends and expert experience.

Key Insights 2025

  • EU sanctions and international restrictions radically change the approach to opening bank accounts and licensing business in Europe.
  • Success depends on the transparency of the corporate structure, thorough document preparation, and continuous compliance.
  • Diversification of banking partners and the use of alternative payment tools are key to business resilience.

How to Open an Account and Obtain a License

Step Description and Key Actions Important Documents/Tools
Sanction Status Analysis Check the company, beneficiaries, PEP, sources of funds Due diligence, KYC, AML
Structuring Preparation Transparent corporate structure, connection audit Corporate reporting, audit
Choosing a Jurisdiction Compare EU, Asia, alternative country requirements Comparative analysis, consultations
Document Preparation Gather a full package for the bank and licensing Passports, charter, business plan, reports
Choose Bank/Fintech Evaluate reliability, sanction resilience Bank ratings, reviews, recommendations
Multi-Banking Strategy Diversify accounts and payment tools Alternatives list, fintech solutions
Continuous Compliance Implement AML procedures, regular monitoring Internal regulations, training

How to Choose a Jurisdiction and Bank

  • Assess not only regulatory requirements but also the sanction resilience of the chosen jurisdiction.
  • Priority should be given to countries with a developed system of financial monitoring and transparent KYC/AML procedures.
  • Use multi-banking and alternative payment tools to diversify risks.

If you want to receive individual consultation on opening a bank account, business licensing in Europe, or minimizing sanction risks, the COREDO team is ready to offer comprehensive support at every stage. Assess your risks and gain a strategic advantage today – contact COREDO experts.

In 2025, the volume of global transactions using cryptocurrency exceeded $4 trillion for the first time, and over 60% of international companies made at least one transaction using digital assets. However, behind these impressive figures lies another reality: less than 10% of businesses have integrated cryptocurrency payments into their processes in a way that is truly legal, secure, and efficient. Why? Because the legalization of cryptocurrency as a means of payment is not only a technological issue but also a complex legal, tax, and compliance challenge where the stakes for businesses are particularly high.

In recent years, the COREDO team has encountered dozens of cases where successful entrepreneurs from the EU, Asia, and Africa found themselves in a state of uncertainty: Is it legal to accept payments in cryptocurrency? What is the status of bitcoin in a particular country? How can businesses avoid account freezes or regulatory claims? How can transparency and compliance be ensured in international settlements using digital assets? These questions today define the development strategy of any business entering the international market.

I am convinced: now it is essential not just to follow trends, but to deeply understand where and how cryptocurrency becomes a legal and effective tool for business. In this article, I—and the COREDO team—share a practical guide to help you not only understand the nuances of regulation but also build a strategy for the legal and safe use of cryptocurrency as a means of payment. If you are looking for answers and solutions that really work—read to the end: here you will find the latest data, best practices, and proven strategies for your business.

Where cryptocurrency payments are allowed

Illustration for the section 'Where cryptocurrency payments are allowed' in the article 'Cryptocurrency as a means of payment – which countries allow it.'
The legalization of cryptocurrency as a means of payment is one of the key challenges for international companies in 2025. The world is divided into several camps: some jurisdictions officially allow cryptocurrency payments, while others limit them to the status of digital assets, and a third group prohibits them entirely. For businesses, this means the need to understand precisely where and how cryptocurrency can be used for company settlements and where it can only be used for investments or storage.

Cryptocurrency regulation in Europe

In recent years, the European Union has demonstrated a systematic approach to cryptocurrency regulation. With the adoption of the MiCA Regulation (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) coming into effect in 2025, the EU has established the status of cryptocurrency as a digital asset but allowed its use for company settlements and payment for services in several countries, subject to strict compliance with AML/KYC standards and obtaining the necessary licenses.

In Germany, for example, bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies are recognized as legal means of payment between companies. There is a clear customer identification procedure (KYC) in place, and companies providing cryptocurrency payment gateways must have a BaFin license. COREDO’s experience has shown that integrating cryptocurrency payments into German business processes is only possible with transparent reporting on cryptocurrency operations and compliance with digital taxation.

In Estonia, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Cyprus, cryptocurrency is also permitted for corporate settlements but with several restrictions: mandatory Licensing, financial monitoring of crypto operations, regular reporting on cryptocurrency transactions. Solutions developed by COREDO allow clients not only to legally accept cryptocurrency payments in Europe but also to optimize taxation by using corporate wallets and smart contracts for settlements.

Cryptocurrency regulation in Asia

Asian markets are characterized by a dynamic approach to cryptocurrency regulation. Singapore remains one of the most progressive jurisdictions: cryptocurrency is legalized for business, and a crypto license is issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). COREDO’s practice confirms that obtaining a license in Singapore is possible within 3-6 months, provided there is full compliance with AML and KYC requirements and a financial monitoring system for crypto operations.

In Hong Kong, Japan, and South Korea, cryptocurrency is allowed for company settlements, but only with a license and after undergoing regular Due Diligence procedures. Implementing cryptocurrency payments in these countries requires integration with local cryptocurrency payment gateways and adherence to national cryptocompliance standards.

Meanwhile, in China and India, the use of cryptocurrency for company settlements is prohibited, and violations are subject to heavy fines. Therefore, when choosing an Asian jurisdiction for registering a company working with cryptocurrency, it is important to carefully analyze the legal status of cryptocurrency and licensing requirements.

Cryptocurrency in Africa – market prospects

The African continent is becoming one of the fastest-growing markets for cryptocurrency settlements. In South Africa, Nigeria, Kenya, and Ghana, cryptocurrency is allowed for international company settlements but requires passing KYC and AML procedures. In South Africa, for example, companies are required to report cryptocurrency operations and integrate corporate wallets with national payment systems.

COREDO’s team has implemented several projects for integrating cryptocurrency payments for e-commerce and B2B companies in Africa, where particular attention is paid to cross-border cryptocurrency transfers and managing sanction risks. Here, not only legal aspects are important but also technical integration with international crypto exchanges and payment gateways.

Countries where cryptocurrency is legalized in 2025

Country Status of Cryptocurrency Can be used for settlements AML/KYC Requirements Licensing Taxation Features
Germany Legalized Yes Yes Yes Capital gains tax
Singapore Legalized Yes Yes Yes Friendly taxation
UAE Legalized (ADGM, DMCC) Yes Yes Yes Exemption for residents
Estonia Legalized Yes Yes Yes Mandatory reporting
South Africa Partially allowed Limited Yes No Mandatory reporting
Japan Legalized Yes Yes Yes Special tax
Czech Republic Legalized Yes Yes Yes Standard tax
Cyprus Legalized Yes Yes Yes Friendly taxation
United Kingdom Legalized Yes Yes Yes Capital gains tax

Requirements for cryptocurrency settlements

Illustration for the section 'Requirements for cryptocurrency settlements' in the article 'Cryptocurrency as a means of payment – in which countries is it legal.'
Cryptocurrency regulation in 2025 is built on three pillars: compliance with anti-money laundering (AML) laws, client identification (KYC), and business licensing. For businesses, this means setting up processes so that each cryptocurrency payment is transparent and all operations align with international FATF standards and national regulators’ requirements.

AML and KYC for corporate crypto payments

AML and KYC have become obligatory components of any cryptocurrency infrastructure. In the EU and Singapore, companies are required to conduct client identification, analyze the source of funds, and monitor suspicious transactions. COREDO’s practice has shown that implementing automated solutions for financial monitoring of crypto operations not only reduces the risk of account closures but also increases trust from banks and investors.

In COREDO cases on supporting company registrations for cryptocurrency operations in Estonia and the United Kingdom, special attention was paid to the Due Diligence of partners and counterparties, as well as the integration of cryptocompliance tools into clients’ ERP systems. This ensures not only the legal purity of operations but also transparency for auditors and tax authorities.

License for cryptocurrency operations

Obtaining a license for cryptocurrency activities is a crucial step for companies planning to work with cryptocurrency legally. In the EU and Asia, the principle applies: no license means no right to conduct cryptocurrency settlements between companies. In Singapore, for example, licensing takes 3 to 6 months and requires a local office, a local director, and an internal AML/KYC control system.

COREDO’s solution for clients includes selecting the optimal legal form, preparing a complete document package, and supporting all licensing stages: from application to integration with regulatory sandboxes.

Taxes and cryptocurrency reporting

Implementing cryptocurrency payments in business processes requires accounting for the features of digital taxation and reporting. In Germany and the UK, there is a capital gains tax on cryptocurrency, while in Singapore and Cyprus: a friendly tax regime for companies working with digital assets. COREDO’s experience showed that tax optimization is achieved through the correct choice of jurisdiction, using corporate wallets, and integrating automated cryptocurrency transaction reporting systems.

Important nuance: in most European and Asian countries, companies must provide detailed reporting on all cryptocurrency transactions, including cross-border transfers, which requires implementing specialized financial monitoring solutions.

In the context of increased control, special attention should be paid to managing possible risks associated with using cryptocurrencies in settlements.

Business risks in cryptocurrency settlements

The key risks for businesses in cryptocurrency settlements include sanction restrictions, transaction block risks, exchange rate volatility, and financial monitoring complexity. COREDO’s practice confirms that minimizing risks is achieved by implementing risk management systems, conducting regular audits of cryptocurrency operations, and using reliable payment gateways with AML/KYC support.

In several jurisdictions (e.g., the USA and China), strict restrictions apply to cross-border cryptocurrency transfers for businesses, and violations can lead to serious sanctions. Therefore, when building international cryptocurrency settlements, it is important to assess sanction risks in advance and integrate compliance procedures at all stages.

Cryptocurrency for Business: How to Implement?

Illustration for the section 'Cryptocurrency for Business: How to Implement?' in the article 'Cryptocurrency as a means of payment – in which countries is it legal.'
Integrating cryptocurrency payments into business processes: is not only a technological but also a strategic challenge. Successful integration requires taking into account the specifics of corporate settlements, choosing appropriate tools, and ensuring full compliance with compliance requirements.

Let’s consider the steps necessary to organize the acceptance of digital assets in the company.

How to accept cryptocurrency payments

In practice, implementing cryptocurrency payments for legal entities starts with choosing a jurisdiction and obtaining a license. Next is the integration of corporate wallets and payment gateways, setting up due diligence procedures, and staff training. COREDO’s solutions enable the integration of cryptocurrency payments into companies’ ERP systems, ensuring automatic transaction processing, commission accounting, and payment transparency for investors and auditors.

Particular attention is paid to choosing a payment gateway: it must support necessary AML/KYC standards, be integrated with corporate accounts, and provide protection against sanction risks.

Tools for compliance and transparent settlements

Modern cryptocompliance tools allow for automated financial monitoring, tracking the origin of funds, and generating cryptocurrency transaction reports in accordance with international standards. COREDO’s practice has shown that integrating solutions for compliance and transparent settlements reduces the risk of account closures and increases trust from banks and regulators.

In COREDO cases on supporting B2B payments in cryptocurrency, special attention was paid to implementing tools for transaction control, automatic data reconciliation, and preparing reports for tax authorities.

Stablecoin and DeFi in international settlements

Stablecoin and DeFi are becoming key tools for international settlements between companies. Stablecoin helps reduce volatility risks and enable fast cross-border transfers with minimal fees. In several countries (Singapore, UAE, Estonia), stablecoin is officially recognized as a means of corporate settlement, and its regulation is based on transparency and compliance principles.

The COREDO team has implemented projects to integrate DeFi protocols and asset tokenization for corporate clients, optimizing settlements and enhancing the liquidity of digital assets on company balances.

How to choose a jurisdiction for business

Illustration for the section 'How to choose a jurisdiction for business' in the article 'Cryptocurrency as a means of payment – which countries allow it.'
Choosing a jurisdiction for registering a crypto company is a strategic decision that determines not only the legality but also the efficiency of using cryptocurrency in business. Here it is important to consider not only the legal status of cryptocurrency but also the requirements for licensing, taxation, AML/KYC, and reporting.

How to choose a jurisdiction for crypto business

COREDO’s practice shows that the best jurisdiction is where cryptocurrency is legalized as a means of payment, where there is transparent regulation, and where the licensing and reporting process is as transparent as possible. It is crucial to consider FATF client identification requirements, the presence of regulatory sandboxes, and the possibility of integration with international payment systems.

Key criteria:

  • The status of cryptocurrency as a means of payment
  • The availability and transparency of the licensing procedure
  • AML/KYC and Due Diligence requirements
  • Taxation and reporting features
  • The possibility of integrating with corporate wallets and payment gateways

Conditions for business in the EU, Asia, and Africa

Region Cryptocurrency legalization Licensing AML/KYC Taxation Reporting
EU Yes (in most countries) Yes Yes Standard/capital gains Mandatory
Asia In several countries (SG, JP, HK) Yes Yes Friendly/special regimes Mandatory
Africa Partially (South Africa, Nigeria) Not always Yes Standard/reporting Mandatory

Practical recommendations for businesses

Illustration for the section 'Practical recommendations for businesses' in the article 'Cryptocurrency as a means of payment – which countries allow it.'

Cryptocurrency as a means of payment is not just a technological trend but a strategic tool for business scaling, optimizing international settlements, and increasing financial flexibility. On the other hand, the legalization of cryptocurrency requires a deep understanding of regulation, choosing the optimal jurisdiction, and establishing a compliance system at all stages.

Practical steps for business:

  1. Review current business processes and identify where and how cryptocurrency payments can be integrated.
  2. Select a jurisdiction with transparent regulation and the ability to obtain a license for cryptocurrency activities.
  3. Implement AML/KYC and financial monitoring systems for all cryptocurrency operations.
  4. Integrate corporate wallets and payment gateways that meet international standards.
  5. Optimize taxation using the possibilities of digital taxation and automated reporting.
  6. Regularly conduct Due Diligence for partners and counterparties to minimize sanction and compliance risks.
  7. Prepare for audits of cryptocurrency operations by integrating solutions for transaction transparency and traceability.
COREDO’s practice confirms that a comprehensive approach to the legalization and integration of cryptocurrency payments not only reduces legal and financial risks but also ensures sustainable business growth in the context of global digitalization. If you strive to use cryptocurrency as a legal, efficient, and safe means of payment—the COREDO team is ready to be your reliable partner on this path.
In 2025, more than 70% of transactions in global capital markets are conducted through licensed structures, and the cost of jurisdiction errors for an investment company can reach 15% of annual turnover: these are data rarely discussed publicly, but which the COREDO team has encountered in real cases. Why has licensing of investment activities become not just a formality but a strategic success factor for businesses in the EU, Asia, and Africa? How do you choose the right type of investment license to not only meet international standards but also minimize risks, enhance transparency and access capital markets?
Today, entrepreneurs and leaders face increasing regulatory complexity, tightening requirements for AML and KYC, and the need to implement modern compliance technologies. Mistakes at the licensing stage can cost the company not only time and money but also its reputation. In this article, I will detail the main types of investment licenses, their differences and requirements in key jurisdictions, and share practical recommendations based on COREDO’s experience. If you are striving for strategic business development and want to avoid common mistakes: I recommend reading this guide to the end.

Types of Investment Licenses: Differences and Classification

Illustration for the section “Types of Investment Licenses: Differences and Classification” in the article “Investment License – Main Types and Their Differences”
Types of investment licenses differ in authority, requirements, and areas of application, defining their classification and specifics for obtaining. Understanding these differences is crucial for selecting the necessary permit for a specific type of investment activity: from asset management to investment advising. Next, we will discuss the features of specific types of licenses, starting with the CMS license for capital markets.

CMS License for Capital Markets

Keywords: capital markets services license, license for brokerage firms, license for asset managers, license for investment advisors, securities market regulation, investment broker

The Capital Markets Services (CMS) license is foundational for companies dealing with securities, derivatives, asset management, and investment consulting. Such a license is necessary for brokerage firms, asset managers, investment advisors, and depositaries. In various jurisdictions, CMS license requirements differ significantly: for instance, in Singapore, it is issued by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), while in the EU, by national regulators under ESMA supervision.
COREDO’s practice confirms: the CMS license is not merely a permit for activity but a tool for accessing international capital markets, enhancing trust among investors and partners. It is important to note that the license for brokerage firms and asset managers differs in the scope of permitted operations, capital requirements, and internal control structures.

Asset Management and Financial Services License

Keywords: financial services license, license for asset managers, license for investment funds, license for family office, fund management license, fiduciary management license

The financial services license encompasses a wide range of activities: from fund and family office management to fiduciary management and investment insurance. For investment funds and family offices, key criteria include ownership structure transparency, minimum statutory capital, and compliance procedures implementation.
Solutions developed at COREDO for international investment funds show: successful Licensing requires not only well-prepared documents but also the establishment of a corporate governance system that aligns with international standards. For example, a fund management license in the EU mandates the presence of an independent auditor and the implementation of financial monitoring procedures.

License for an Investment Company

Keywords: license for fintech companies, license for SPV, license for private equity, investment platform licensing, license for investment apps, investment insurance license

Specialized licenses are essential for companies operating in fintech, private equity, SPV (Special Purpose Vehicle), investment platforms, and apps. Licensing investment platforms is particularly focused, where AML, KYC, and due diligence requirements have significantly tightened in recent years.
COREDO’s experience in supporting fintech companies in Singapore and the EU shows: successful licensing requires integration of digital compliance tools, KYC process automation, and constant updating of procedures in line with new regulatory requirements. For SPV and private equity, transparency of beneficiaries and financial sustainability are key requirements.

Licenses for Securities and Alt-Assets

Keywords: securities operations license, futures trading license, tokenized assets issuance license, investment ICO/IEO licensing, cryptocurrency asset licensing, crowdfunding license

The modern market demands licensing not only for classic securities operations but also for work with alternative assets: tokenized assets, ICO/IEO, crowdfunding, and cryptocurrencies. In the EU and Asia, cryptocurrency asset and investment platform licensing have become distinct fields with specific Due Diligence and financial monitoring requirements.
The COREDO team has executed projects for licensing crowdfunding platforms and tokenized asset issuance in Estonia and Singapore, where AML procedures and ownership structure transparency are of great importance. A futures trading and securities operations license mandates the implementation of automated risk monitoring systems and regular investment audits.

Licenses for Investments: EU, Asia, Africa

Illustration for the section “Licenses for Investments: EU, Asia, Africa” in the article “Investment License – Main Types and Their Differences”
Investment licenses in the EU, Asia, and Africa differ significantly in requirements and regulatory characteristics. Choosing the appropriate jurisdiction directly affects the conditions for investment activities and the set of required documents for obtaining a permit. Next, we’ll dissect the key aspects of obtaining an investment license within the European Union’s territory.

License in the EU: Requirements and Features

Keywords: licensing in the EU, investment license requirements, minimum statutory capital, beneficiary transparency, AML, KYC, investment audit

In the European Union, the licensing of investment activities is governed by the MiFID II and AIFMD directives and national laws under ESMA supervision. To obtain a capital market or fund management license, a minimum statutory capital (starting at 125,000 EUR), full beneficiary transparency, and the implementation of stringent AML/KYC procedures are required.
COREDO’s practice shows: successful licensing of an investment fund or platform in the EU is impossible without comprehensive investment audit, financial sustainability confirmation, and readiness for regular regulatory inspections. Special attention is given to corporate governance, independent auditing, and compliance process automation.
Therefore, investment activity licensing in the EU demands a comprehensive approach to compliance and corporate governance; approaches to licensing in key Asian jurisdictions significantly vary in structure and requirements.

Licensing in Asia: Main Markets

Keywords: licensing in Asia, license for fintech companies, crowdfunding license, tokenized asset issuance license, investment due diligence

In Asia, Singapore, Hong Kong, and the UAE remain key licensing centers. In Singapore, capital markets and fintech service licenses are issued by MAS, while in Hong Kong by the SFC. Here, investment due diligence, AML, and KYC requirements are considered some of the strictest globally.
The COREDO team has assisted in launching investment platforms and licensing crowdfunding services in Singapore, where particular importance is placed on digital compliance automation tools and financial monitoring. For fintech companies and crypto platforms, procedures for source of funds verification, regular audits, and innovative solutions for managing investment risks are mandatory.

Business Licensing in Africa

Keywords: licensing in Africa, investment license for international business, financial sustainability, investment risks

African jurisdictions, such as Mauritius and South Africa, are becoming increasingly attractive for international business due to flexible licensing requirements and relatively low entry thresholds. However, the regulatory specifics demand special attention to the financial sustainability of the company and management of investment risks.
COREDO’s experience in supporting clients in African markets shows: key success factors are ownership structure transparency, readiness for external audits, and implementation of financial monitoring procedures that comply with international standards.

Requirements for Investment Licenses in the EU, Asia, and Africa

Criterion EU Asia (Singapore, Hong Kong) Africa (Mauritius, South Africa)
Minimum Capital from 125,000 EUR from 500,000 SGD from 50,000 USD
Time to Obtain 3-9 months 4-8 months 2-6 months
AML/KYC Requirements Strict Very strict Average
Beneficiary Transparency Mandatory Mandatory Mandatory
Permitted Activities Wide range Wide range Limited
Key Regulators ESMA, national MAS, SFC FSC, FSCA

Investment License: How to Obtain?

Illustration for the section “Investment License: How to Obtain?” in the article “Investment License – Main Types and Their Differences”
An investment license is an important permit that allows legal investment activity within the chosen jurisdiction. In this section, we will explore how to get an investment license, what stages and requirements to face, and what international companies should consider when choosing a country and license type.

Investment License for an International Company

Keywords: process of obtaining an investment license, stages of obtaining an investment license, due diligence investments, investment audit, compliance

  1. Analysis and choice of jurisdiction, assessment of business goals, license requirements, tax residency, and investment risks.
  2. Corporate structure preparation – forming a transparent ownership structure, appointing directors, determining the amount of statutory capital.
  3. Collection and preparation of documents: constituent documents, business plan, source of funds confirmation, AML/KYC procedures.
  4. Due diligence investments: verification of beneficiaries, source of capital, financial sustainability.
  5. Application submission and interaction with the regulator: processing the application, responding to inquiries, providing additional information.
  6. Investment audit and compliance – implementing financial monitoring procedures, preparing for external audit.
  7. obtaining the license and starting activities, registration in the registry, obtaining work permits, setting up internal compliance procedures.

Documents for an Investment License

Keywords: what documents are needed for an investment license, beneficiary transparency, minimum statutory capital, corporate governance

  1. Articles of association and founding documents of the company
  2. Information on beneficiaries and ownership structure
  3. Confirmation of minimum statutory capital
  4. Business plan describing the investment strategy
  5. AML/KYC policies and procedures
  6. Proof of qualifications of management and staff
  7. Contracts with independent auditors and compliance officers
COREDO’s corporate governance solutions enable clients not only to gather the required document package but also to build a transparent ownership structure, significantly speeding up the licensing process.

AML, KYC, and Financial Monitoring – What Are They?

Keywords: AML, KYC, financial monitoring, compliance, regulation of investment activities

Implementing AML and KYC procedures: a prerequisite for obtaining and maintaining an investment license in any jurisdiction. COREDO’s practice shows: automating client verification processes, integrating digital transaction monitoring tools, and regularly updating compliance policies help minimize risks and enhance business efficiency.

For companies dealing with crypto-assets or crowdfunding, the implementation of comprehensive financial monitoring systems complying with international FATF standards and local regulatory requirements is of particular importance.

Beneficiary Verification and Investment Audit

Keywords: how the audit is conducted when obtaining an investment license, beneficiary verification, investment audit

Regulators in the EU, Asia, and Africa focus heavily on beneficiary verification and investment audit. In practice, COREDO has encountered situations where delays in providing information about ultimate owners led to license denial or a substantial extension of the application review timeline.
For successful audit completion, it’s important to prepare all supporting documents in advance, maintain transparency in structure, and demonstrate the company’s financial sustainability.

Investment Licenses: Pros and Risks for Business

Illustration for the section “Investment Licenses: Pros and Risks for Business” in the article “Investment License – Main Types and Their Differences”

Investment licenses open new opportunities for businesses, allowing legal engagement in specific types of investment activities and entry into financial markets. However, obtaining them is associated with additional benefits as well as a range of risks and limitations, which are important to consider when developing a company strategy.

Impact of License on Capital Access

Keywords: capital market license, investment license for international business, return on investment, investment risks

An investment license opens access to international capital markets, boosts investor and partner trust, and enables business scaling through an expanded service range. COREDO’s experience shows: licensing directly affects return on investment (ROI), reducing operational and legal risks.

For international companies, a license becomes not only a compliance tool but also a strategic asset, allowing the attraction of funding, launching new products, and entering new markets.

Risks When Choosing a Jurisdiction

Keywords: risks when choosing jurisdiction for an investment license, tax residency, investment risks, license holder restrictions

Choosing a jurisdiction for obtaining an investment license is associated with various risks: from tax residency changes and currency control to restrictions on activity types and disclosure requirements. In COREDO’s practice, there have been cases where companies faced unforeseen limitations, such as the need for regular external audits or restrictions on attracting investments from specific countries.
To minimize risks, it’s essential to conduct thorough due diligence of the jurisdiction, analyze tax and operational implications, and consult experts with regional experience.

Licensing Technologies for Investment Activity

Keywords: new licensing technologies, cryptocurrency assets licensing, investment apps, digital compliance tools

Modern trends in licensing investment activities are tied to the implementation of digital tools, compliance process automation, and cryptocurrency asset regulation development. COREDO’s digital compliance solutions allow clients to expedite KYC, transaction monitoring, and regulatory reporting processes.
Special attention is given to licensing investment applications and platforms employing artificial intelligence for portfolio management and risk analysis. The introduction of new technologies not only ensures regulatory compliance but also enhances business competitiveness.

How to Get an Investment License

Illustration for the section “How to Get an Investment License” in the article “Investment License – Main Types and Their Differences”
To begin legal investment activities, it is essential to understand how to get an investment license and what types of licenses exist. This process demands a grasp of financial legislation specifics and the right choice of license considering planned services and jurisdiction.

How to Choose an Investment License

Keywords: how to choose the type of investment license, license for fintech companies, license for family office, license for investment fund

Choosing the type of investment license depends on the company’s activity field, strategic goals, capital requirements, and jurisdiction specifics. COREDO’s experience shows: for fintech companies, jurisdictions with a developed digital infrastructure and flexible licensing requirements are optimal, while for family offices, regions offering high confidentiality and transparency protection are preferable.

For investment funds, key criteria include capital requirements, opportunities for international investment attraction, and double taxation avoidance agreements.

Due Diligence Practices and Transparency

Keywords: due diligence investments, ownership structure transparency, financial sustainability

Ensuring ownership structure transparency, conducting independent audits, and confirming financial sustainability are crucial for successful licensing. Solutions realized by COREDO include implementing automated systems for due diligence, preparing detailed business plans, and regularly updating beneficiary information.

These measures not only expedite the license acquisition process but also minimize rejection risks from the regulator.

Errors in Preparing for Licensing

Keywords: errors in preparing for licensing, investment consulting, corporate governance

The most common errors companies make when preparing for licensing include incomplete ownership structure transparency, insufficient corporate governance attention, and untimely AML/KYC procedure implementation. The COREDO team has often assisted clients in adjusting strategies after regulator rejections by implementing comprehensive corporate governance and compliance automation solutions.

To prevent errors, it is crucial to engage experts with international investment consulting experience and regularly update internal procedures in line with legislative changes.
Thus, minimizing errors in the licensing process requires a systematic approach and timely response to regulatory requirement changes, which will be further explored in the conclusions and practical recommendations for entrepreneurs.

Conclusions and Advice for Entrepreneurs

  • The choice of investment license type should be based on business strategic objectives, capital requirements, and jurisdiction specifics.
  • Transparency of ownership structure and the implementation of modern compliance procedures are key factors for successful licensing.
  • Implementing digital tools for automating KYC, AML, and financial monitoring enhances business efficiency and lowers risks.
  • Deep due diligence of the chosen jurisdiction allows avoiding unforeseen limitations and minimizing investment risks.
  • Timely expert engagement and regular updates of corporate governance procedures ensure long-term stability and competitiveness in international markets.
COREDO’s practice confirms: a strategic approach to licensing investment activities is not just compliance with formal requirements but an investment in the future of your business.
In 2024, more than 70% of deals involving the sale of stakes in international companies include a Right of First Refusal (ROFR) or Right of First Offer (ROFO) – tools that can protect a business from hostile takeovers or cause corporate conflicts and legal disputes. Why do some shareholder agreements provide transparency and control while others lead to lengthy litigations and company value loss? How to avoid common mistakes when structuring deals with ROFR and ROFO in the EU, Asia, and Africa, considering the specifics of corporate law and AML compliance requirements?

In practice, the COREDO team has repeatedly encountered situations where formally identical mechanisms led to diametrically opposite results – everything depends on the nuances of implementation and support. This article is not just an overview but a practical guide where I share strategies, case studies, and best practices accumulated by COREDO in supporting international deals, company registrations, and obtaining financial licenses in Europe, Asia, and Africa. If you want to understand how to use ROFR and ROFO to protect shareholder interests, minimize legal risks, and enhance the business’s investment appeal: I recommend reading to the end.

Right of First Refusal and Right of First Offer

Illustration for the section ‘Right of First Refusal and Right of First Offer’ in the article ‘Right of First Refusal (ROFR) and Right of First Offer (ROFO) – comparison’
For effective legal support to businesses, it is important to clearly distinguish between the Right of First Refusal (ROFR) and the Right of First Offer (ROFO). Both mechanisms are widely used in shareholder agreements, investment memorandums, and corporate exit procedures. However, their legal nature and consequences differ significantly.

Right of First Refusal: What It Is

ROFR is a contractual right granting certain shareholders or investors the advantage of purchasing a stake if another participant decides to sell it. A classic example: a shareholder intends to sell their stake to a third party but must offer it to existing shareholders first on the same terms. If they refuse, the sale to a third party is possible.

In COREDO’s practice, the following types of ROFR are often encountered:

  • Standard ROFR: applies to all types of transactions with shares or stakes, including M&A and corporate restructuring.
  • Limited ROFR: applies only when selling to strategic investors or exceeding a certain value threshold.
  • Multi-tier ROFR: involves sequentially offering the stake to different categories of shareholders (e.g., majority shareholders first, then minority shareholders).
In one of COREDO’s cases during a deal in the Czech Republic, implementing ROFR allowed the founders to maintain corporate control while attracting an external venture investor, minimizing the risk of a hostile takeover and ensuring transparency in the transfer conditions.
Thanks to these mechanisms, ROFR serves as an important tool for protecting shareholder interests and forming a sustainable corporate governance structure. Next, we’ll consider the Right of First Offer (ROFO) and its specifics.

Right of First Offer (ROFO): What It Is

ROFO: this is the right whereby a shareholder wishing to sell their stake must first offer it to specific individuals (usually other shareholders) before approaching third parties. Unlike ROFR, deal terms are decided in negotiations between the seller and ROFO holders, not copied from a third-party offer.

COREDO’s practice shows that ROFO is often used in strategic partnerships and joint ventures, as well as in corporate restructuring, where it is important to maintain seller flexibility and reduce the risk of deal blocking. For example, during a company registration in Singapore, our experience showed that ROFO is effective in protecting minority interests and preventing corporate conflicts when one partner exits.

ROFR and ROFO: What is the Difference?

Illustration for the section ‘ROFR and ROFO: What is the Difference?’ in the article ‘Right of First Refusal (ROFR) and Right of First Offer (ROFO) – comparison’
A deep understanding of the differences between ROFR and ROFO allows not only optimal shareholder protection but also avoids common mistakes leading to corporate risks and legal disputes.

ROFR and ROFO: Examples in the EU, Asia, Africa

In Europe, ROFR is traditionally used to protect the interests of minority shareholders and prevent undesirable changes in the shareholder structure, especially in highly regulated industries (financial services, fintech, insurance). In Asia, based on COREDO’s experience, ROFO is more often applied in structures with several strategic investors, where flexibility and transaction speed are important. In Africa, where corporate law and foreign investment regulation can vary significantly across countries, the choice between ROFR and ROFO depends on deal objectives, capital structure, and local regulatory requirements.

In one of COREDO’s projects registering a company in Estonia for a fintech startup, implementing ROFR effectively integrated AML compliance and KYC procedures, reducing the risk of EU law violations when transferring stakes to foreign investors.

ROFR and ROFO: Impact on Company Value

The presence of ROFR or ROFO directly affects business valuation in M&A, venture investments, and corporate restructuring. On one hand, these mechanisms increase transaction transparency and protect shareholder interests, positively impacting the investment memorandum and reducing risks for investors. On the other hand, excessively restrictive terms can deter potential buyers, reduce stake liquidity, and complicate corporate exit procedures.

COREDO’s team executed a case in the UK where optimizing ROFO terms increased the company’s value by 12% when attracting a strategic investor, by reducing the risk of corporate conflicts and enhancing transparency of deal terms.

Errors and Risks in ROFR/ROFO Arrangement

Key legal risks in arranging ROFR and ROFO include:

  • unclear formulation of the exercise conditions (e.g., periods, notification procedures, deal terms);
  • lack of enforcement mechanisms in different legal systems;
  • conflicts between shareholders when exercising the right (especially in multi-tiered structures);
  • non-compliance with AML/KYC compliance requirements during stake transfer.
COREDO’s practice confirms: typical mistakes, lack of Due Diligence in ROFR/ROFO implementation, ignoring tax consequences, and inconsistency with other corporate rights (drag-along, tag-along, pre-emptive rights) can lead to legal disputes and loss of business control.

ROFR and ROFO: How to Implement in Practice

Illustration for the section ‘ROFR and ROFO: How to Implement in Practice’ in the article ‘Right of First Refusal (ROFR) and Right of First Offer (ROFO) – comparison’
Effective implementation of ROFR and ROFO requires not only legal literacy but also compliance procedure integration, automation, and consideration of industry best practices.

Structuring Deals: ROFR and ROFO

In practice, COREDO has developed the following algorithm for structuring deals with ROFR and ROFO:

  1. Analyze goals and capital structure: define shareholder protection tasks, corporate control, and investment appeal.
  2. Choose the mechanism (ROFR or ROFO): considering jurisdictional features, shareholder composition, industry, and local regulations.
  3. Prepare a shareholder agreement: clear articulation of the right’s conditions, terms, notification procedures, and business evaluation for ROFR/ROFO.
  4. Integrate compliance procedures: AML/KYC, corporate due diligence, coordination with international tax planning.
  5. Test enforceability: verify the agreement’s enforceability within the relevant jurisdiction, considering judicial practices and local regulations.
  6. Automate control: implement digital tools to monitor ROFR/ROFO adherence and deal transparency.

ROFR, ROFO, and Drag-along: How to Combine?

To minimize corporate risks and protect investor interests, it is crucial to coordinate ROFR/ROFO with drag-along rights (forced sale rights), tag-along rights (right to join sale), and pre-emptive rights (right of first purchase). In one of COREDO’s projects supporting M&A in Slovakia, integrating these mechanisms ensured a balance between corporate control and minority stakeholders’ exit flexibility.

Digital Tools for ROFR/ROFO Management

Modern legal tech solutions allow automating legal procedures for ROFR/ROFO: from electronic shareholder notifications to monitoring timelines and deal condition adherence. In COREDO’s practice, implementing such tools significantly reduced shareholder agreement breach risks and enhanced corporate governance transparency, especially in multinational structures.

ROFR and ROFO: How to Consider EU, Asia, Africa Requirements

Illustration for the section ‘ROFR and ROFO: How to Consider EU, Asia, Africa Requirements’ in the article ‘Right of First Refusal (ROFR) and Right of First Offer (ROFO) – comparison’
International practice shows the effectiveness of ROFR and ROFO is largely determined by corporate law specifics and local regulations.

Taxes with ROFR and ROFO in Different Countries

In Europe, the tax consequences of stake transfers with ROFR/ROFO are regulated by both corporate and EU tax laws. In Asia and Africa, additional registration requirements may apply, including stamp duties and international tax planning specifics. COREDO’s experience shows that preliminary tax consequence analysis is a mandatory due diligence step when implementing ROFR/ROFO.

Judicial Practice on ROFR and ROFO Disputes

International judicial practice includes cases where vague ROFR/ROFO wording led to transaction invalidation or prolonged corporate disputes. In a recent COREDO case in Estonia, proper ROFR mechanism integration and corporate procedure transparency helped avoid a legal conflict between founders and minority investors.

Recommendations for Entrepreneurs and Executives

Illustration for the section ‘Recommendations for Entrepreneurs and Executives’ in the article ‘Right of First Refusal (ROFR) and Right of First Offer (ROFO) – comparison’
Recommendations for entrepreneurs and executives on using ROFR/ROFO will help avoid typical mistakes and maximize these tools’ effectiveness in protecting business interests. It is important to understand the key differences and implementation specifics of such agreements so every decision is balanced and aligns with your strategic goals.

How to Implement ROFR/ROFO Without Mistakes

  1. Conduct a comprehensive due diligence of the capital structure and deal objectives.
  2. Select the optimal mechanism (ROFR or ROFO) considering jurisdiction and shareholder composition.
  3. Clearly state the conditions for exercising the right, timelines, notification procedures, and business evaluation.
  4. Integrate AML/KYC compliance and tax planning.
  5. Coordinate ROFR/ROFO with drag-along, tag-along, and pre-emptive rights.
  6. Implement automated tools for deal control and transparency.
  7. Verify shareholder agreement enforceability in the relevant jurisdiction.

How to Minimize Legal and Tax Risks

  • Use international corporate governance standards and best practices for ROFR/ROFO implementation.
  • Regularly update shareholder agreements with legal changes in the EU, Asia, and Africa.
  • Engage professional consultants for deal support and compliance procedure integration.
  • Implement digital tools to automate ROFR/ROFO compliance monitoring.

What is ROFR and ROFO, Answers to Questions

What is the key difference between ROFR and ROFO?

ROFR is exercised after receiving a third-party offer, ROFO: before approaching third parties. This affects deal flexibility and shareholder interest protection.

When is it advantageous to use ROFR, and when ROFO?

ROFR is preferable for protecting corporate control, ROFO for enhancing flexibility and minimizing deal blocking risks, especially in multinational companies.

How to ensure ROFR/ROFO enforceability in different jurisdictions?

Requires clear condition formulation in the shareholder agreement, compliance procedure integration, and regular checks for changes in the respective country’s corporate law.

How to account for AML/KYC compliance when transferring stakes with ROFR/ROFO?

Include beneficiary identification and verification procedures in corporate documents, use automated monitoring systems.

ROFR and ROFO: Differences and Risks

Criterion ROFR (Right of First Refusal) ROFO (Right of First Offer)
Implementation Timing After a third-party offer Before approaching third parties
Seller Flexibility Lower Higher
Minority Protection Medium High
Corporate Conflict Risks Medium Lower
Applicability in M&A Often Often
Regional Features Important Important
Implementing ROFR and ROFO, a strategic tool for business protection, corporate structure optimization, and enhancing company investment appeal. COREDO’s practice confirms: only a comprehensive approach, compliance integration, and regional considerations allow using these mechanisms as effectively and safely as possible.
Did you know that in 2024 more than 20% of European internet users visit torrent sites at least once a month, and the total damage from digital piracy in the EU is estimated in billions of euros annually? Meanwhile, fines for downloading torrents in Germany can reach tens of thousands of euros for a single episode, and the legal practice on torrents is becoming increasingly strict and predictable. What are the real legal risks for businesses and individuals, and why can even accidental use of peer-to-peer (P2P) networks lead to serious consequences for companies?

Today, torrent network regulation in the EU: it’s not just a matter of copyright, but a complex issue of compliance, data protection, corporate responsibility, and even cybersecurity. Blocking torrent sites, monitoring IP addresses, Abmahnung notifications, internet traffic filtering, and GDPR requirements all shape a new reality for entrepreneurs and executives working in Europe, Asia, and the CIS.

In this article, I will thoroughly examine what is legally permitted in relation to torrents in Europe, how approaches differ across countries, what risks businesses bear, and which strategies for minimizing legal and reputational losses actually work in practice. If you want not only to avoid fines, but also to establish a transparent, sustainable policy in the field of digital content, I recommend reading to the end – you will receive not only a deep analysis but also concrete tools for implementation.

Legality of Torrents in the EU by Country

Illustration for the section 'Legality of Torrents in the EU by Country' in the article 'Torrent Sites in Europe – What Is Permitted by Law'
Torrent sites in Europe are regulated by multiple levels of legislation: national, supranational (EU), and international agreements (WIPO, TRIPS). The legality of torrents in the EU depends on the nature of the content and the purposes of use. It’s important to distinguish legal torrents in Europe (e.g., distribution of open-source or licensed content) and the use of P2P networks for downloading copyrighted materials without the permission of the rights holder.

Thus, a key factor is compliance with the legislation and choosing verified platforms for legal use of P2P networks.

Torrent Sites Allowed in the EU

In most EU countries, the principle applies: access to torrent sites in itself is not prohibited. However, downloading or distributing unlicensed content is a violation of the law. For example, in Germany, France, Italy, and the UK, there is a strict policy of blocking torrent sites by IP and DNS, and internet providers are obliged by agreements with rights holders to restrict access to major pirate resources. Meanwhile, in Spain and the Czech Republic, legislation allows the personal use of torrents for downloading content if it’s not for commercial gain, yet court practices increasingly view even such use as copyright infringement.

In practice, the COREDO team has implemented projects for company registration in the Czech Republic and Estonia, where clients faced questions about the legality of P2P network use for internal needs. Our experience showed: even if there is no formal ban, providers may block access to certain torrent sites at the request of rights holders, and companies can be held accountable for the actions of their employees.

Is it Legal to Use Torrents for Personal Use?

Personal use of torrents in Spain and some Eastern European countries is permitted if the downloaded content is not used for commercial purposes or distributed to third parties. Still, even in these jurisdictions, the court practice on torrents is becoming stricter: courts acknowledge the act of downloading as a violation if the rights holder proves damage. In particular, in Spain, the number of copyright lawsuits has increased in recent years, and fines for torrents in Germany remain among the highest in the EU.

Recommendation developed by COREDO for clients: even if legislation formally permits personal use, companies should implement compliance procedures that exclude the use of torrents by employees on corporate devices to avoid legal risks.

Even considering these trends, additional attention should be given to the decisions of the European Court of Justice, which define the boundaries of permissible restrictions and practice at the EU level.

Restrictions and ECJ Practice

The European Court of Justice (ECJ) has repeatedly emphasized: downloading or distributing copyrighted content via torrent networks without permission is a violation, regardless of the file transfer method. International agreements (WIPO, TRIPS) and EU directives set minimum standards for intellectual rights protection, and ECJ case law establishes a uniform approach to user and provider responsibility.

In one of COREDO’s cases, a client from the UK managed to minimize risks thanks to the timely implementation of Notice-and-Takedown procedures and cooperation with rights holders, which helped avoid lawsuits and penalties.

Responsibility for Torrents and Fines

Illustration for the section 'Responsibility for Torrents and Fines' in the article 'Torrent Sites in Europe – What Is Permitted by Law'
The question of responsibility for downloading torrents in Europe is among the most pressing for businesses. Copyright infringement through P2P networks is classified as a civil, and in some cases, a criminal offense. Court practice on torrents in the EU shows: fines for torrents in Germany, France, and the UK can reach tens of thousands of euros, and in some cases, lead to the blocking of corporate resources.

Fines for Torrents in Germany and the EU

Germany operates a system of Abmahnung, pre-trial notices of copyright infringement sent to users or companies whose IP addresses were recorded downloading unlicensed content. The fine for torrents in Germany can range from 800 to 5000 euros for a single episode, and in cases of repeated violations, the amount increases significantly. In other EU countries (e.g., France, Italy), copyright lawsuits often lead to access blocks or significant financial penalties.

The COREDO team has supported clients who received Abmahnung for torrents in Germany. The solution developed at COREDO included an immediate legal response, negotiations with rights holders, and reducing fine amounts through a lawyer: in some cases, we achieved a significant reduction of sanctions and avoided litigation.

Legal Responsibility of Businesses and Employees

Legal risks for businesses using torrents by employees include not only fines but also reputational losses and possible criminal liability in case of systematic violations. The company owner is responsible for organizing corporate policy on the use of P2P networks, and the IT department for monitoring and preventing illegal torrent use on work devices. COREDO’s practice confirms: a lack of clear internal regulations and Due Diligence procedures often leads to increased risks and costs for dispute resolution.

Abmahnung Court Notification: What to Do?

Receiving an Abmahnung: it’s not a reason to panic, but requires competent and timely response.

COREDO’s recommendation: do not ignore the notification; immediately consult a professional lawyer to assess the validity of the claim and develop a strategy to minimize losses. In some cases, it’s possible to reduce the fine amount and prevent further lawsuits through the implementation of Notice-and-Takedown procedures and a revision of corporate policy.

Blocking Torrent Sites: How to Bypass Restrictions

Illustration for the section 'Blocking Torrent Sites: How to Bypass Restrictions' in the article 'Torrent Sites in Europe – What Is Permitted by Law'
Blocking torrent sites in Europe is implemented in various ways: from traffic filtering and IP/DNS blocking to agreements with internet providers restricting access to pirate sites. In some countries (e.g., UK, France), such measures are enshrined in legislation, and providers are required to transparently report on blockages.

Blocking Torrent Sites in Europe

In the UK and France, torrent site blocking is implemented through court decisions and agreements with providers, who are obliged to filter traffic and restrict access to a list of prohibited resources. In the Czech Republic and Estonia, blocking is often targeted and applied at the rights holder’s request. In Spain, blocking torrent sites is less common; however, court practice is gradually tightening.

The COREDO team analyzed cases of clients facing sudden unavailability of file-sharing resources—the solution was to transition to legal platforms and implement alternative channels for digital content distribution.

VPN: Legal Risks and Bypassing Blocks

Using VPN to bypass torrent site blocks is a common practice, but from a legal perspective, it poses additional risks for businesses. In many EU countries, attempting to bypass restrictions using VPN may be considered an aggravating factor in copyright violations, and digital trace monitoring and user identification are becoming more effective thanks to cybersecurity technology advancements.

Recommendation from COREDO: implement a corporate policy prohibiting the use of VPN for bypassing blocks and educate employees on the principles of online privacy and lawful internet resource use.

GDPR and IP Address Monitoring: How to Handle Data

IP address monitoring of torrent users in the EU is conducted by providers and rights holders to identify violations. Data processing must comply with GDPR requirements: transparent procedures, employee notification, and minimization of personal data storage. Violations of these requirements can lead to additional sanctions from regulators.

COREDO’s practice shows: implementing compliance procedures when working with torrents and regular auditing of corporate internet traffic not only reduces legal risks but also increases trust from partners and clients.

Compliance and Corporate Policy, How to Reduce Risks

Illustration for the section 'Compliance and Corporate Policy, How to Reduce Risks' in the article 'Torrent Sites in Europe – What Is Permitted by Law'
Comprehensive compliance policy is a key tool for minimizing the legal and reputational risks associated with torrent use in business. Internal regulations, employee training, appointing monitoring and due diligence officers allow building a transparent and sustainable digital risk management system.

Internal Compliance Policy for Business

Developing corporate policy for P2P network use starts with auditing current practices, assessing risks, and implementing clear regulations. It’s important to determine which types of content and platforms are allowed, what control and monitoring measures are applied, how employee training is conducted, and how incidents are responded to.

Recommendation from COREDO: integrate compliance and due diligence into the IT sphere, regularly update internal policies according to changes in legislation and court practice, and provide employee training on digital piracy and copyright protection issues.

How to Assess and Reduce Risks

Risk Minimization Measure Expected Effect (ROI)
Fines for Downloading Torrents Implement Corporate Policy, Training Reduction of Fines, Reputation Protection
Abmahnung Notifications Timely Legal Reaction, Lawyer Reduction of Fine Amount
Data Leakage During Monitoring GDPR Compliance, Procedure Transparency Avoid Sanctions, Trust
Reputation Loss Use Legal Platforms Growth of Partner Trust

COREDO’s practice confirms: assessing ROI from implementing legal platforms and compliance procedures not only reduces costs for dispute resolution but also increases business competitiveness in the international market.

Regulation in Asia and Africa: Comparison

In Asian countries (e.g., Singapore, South Korea) and Africa, approaches to torrent network regulation may differ significantly from European ones. In Singapore, there is strict control over copyright violations, and blocking torrent sites is carried out at the request of rights holders and government bodies. In South Korea, internet traffic filtering technologies and copyright lawsuits are actively applied. In some African countries, regulation is less formalized, although international agreements (WIPO, TRIPS) are gradually incorporated into national legislation.

The COREDO team has supported clients in entering Asian markets, where particular attention is paid to due diligence and risk assessment of P2P network use, as well as adapting corporate policy to local requirements.

Legal Alternatives to Torrents for Business

Illustration for the section 'Legal Alternatives to Torrents for Business' in the article 'Torrent Sites in Europe – What Is Permitted by Law'
Modern legal platforms for transmitting large files and digital content distribution allow completely abandoning torrents in a corporate environment. This not only reduces legal risks but also ensures process transparency, protection of intellectual rights, and compliance with international licensing standards.

Platforms for Transmitting Large Files

Effective legal alternatives to torrents for business include licensed cloud services (Google Drive, Dropbox Business, WeTransfer Pro), corporate digital distribution systems (Microsoft OneDrive, Box), as well as specialized platforms for transmitting large files with compliance and encryption support. Legal content distribution through such services complies with GDPR requirements, international agreements, and cybersecurity standards.

COREDO’s experience in implementing legal platforms for clients in the Czech Republic and the UK showed: transitioning to such solutions not only reduces risks but also improves data exchange efficiency within international teams.

Economic Efficiency of Legal Platforms

ROI evaluation of implementing legal platforms instead of torrents includes analyzing direct and indirect costs: reducing fines, decreasing time spent resolving disputes, increasing partner and client trust, and improving business process transparency. COREDO’s practice confirms: investments in legal services pay off by preventing reputational and financial losses and optimizing internal processes.

Practical Recommendations for Business

Using torrents in Europe is a high-risk zone for business. Responsibility for downloading torrents, fines for torrents in Germany, court practice on torrents, and compliance requirements create a new reality for companies operating in the EU, Asia, and the CIS.

Typical Risks and Mitigation Methods

Risk Minimization Measure Expected Effect (ROI)
Fines for Downloading Torrents Implement Corporate Policy, Training Reduction of Fines, Reputation Protection
Abmahnung Notifications Timely Legal Reaction, Lawyer Reduction of Fine Amount
Data Leakage During Monitoring GDPR Compliance, Procedure Transparency Avoid Sanctions, Trust
Reputation Loss Use Legal Platforms Growth of Partner Trust

Checklist for Department Leader

  • Conduct an audit of P2P/torrent use in the company
  • Develop and implement an internal policy for torrent use
  • Appoint someone responsible for compliance and monitoring
  • Ensure employee training
  • Implement legal file-sharing services
  • Ensure GDPR compliance when monitoring traffic
  • Prepare standard procedures for responding to Abmahnung notifications

Next: Answers to frequently asked questions.

Brief Answers to Popular Questions

Which EU countries completely ban torrent sites, and where is personal use allowed?

A full ban is in effect in Germany, France, the UK; in Spain and the Czech Republic, limited personal use is allowed, but court practice is becoming stricter.

What legal risks does a company face if employees use torrents at work?

Risks include fines, lawsuits, reputation losses, and possible criminal liability.

How to build an internal compliance policy to minimize risks associated with torrents?

Introduce clear regulations, appoint responsible persons, train employees, use only legal platforms, and conduct regular audits.

What legal ways exist for distributing large files in international business instead of torrents?

Use licensed cloud services and specialized platforms with compliance and encryption support.

What are the long-term consequences for business with systematic copyright violations through torrents?

Losses include fines, resource blocking, loss of partner and client trust, and restrictions on working in international jurisdictions.

COREDO practice confirms: timely implementation of a comprehensive compliance policy, transitioning to legal platforms, and regular audit processes are the best strategies for minimizing risks and increasing business resilience amid tightening regulation of torrent sites in Europe and beyond.

In 2024, according to STEP and Deloitte, more than 70% of international holding structures in Europe and Asia use Trust Funds for asset protection, capital management, and tax optimization. However, despite their popularity, only a few entrepreneurs and financial directors truly understand how a trust structure works, what functions a trust fund performs, and why this tool is becoming key to sustainable business and family capital development in the face of growing regulatory and compliance requirements.

What challenges do company owners face in the EU, Asia, and Africa?

How to ensure asset protection from corporate disputes, creditors, and political risks? How to structure estate planning and optimize taxation without violating international AML and KYC standards?
The answers to these questions lie in the competent use of trust funds: a tool capable of not only preserving but also increasing capital, ensuring confidentiality and management flexibility.
In this article, I, Nikita Veremeev, founder of COREDO, share a practical guide to creating, structuring, and functioning of a trust fund. Based on the many years of experience of the COREDO team in registering legal entities, obtaining financial licenses, and supporting international projects, we will discuss the key aspects of trust structures, their advantages, risks, and best practices in various jurisdictions. If you want to not just understand what a trust is but learn how to use it for strategic business development – this article is for you.

Trust Fund: Explained Simply

Illustration for the section 'Trust Fund: Explained Simply' in the article 'Trust Fund – Structure, Functions, and Simple Explanation'
A trust fund (or fiduciary fund, trust) is a legal arrangement in which assets are transferred from the trust’s settlor to a trustee for management in the interest of one or more beneficiaries. Unlike traditional corporate structures, a trust is not a legal entity but operates under a trust deed that defines the rights, responsibilities, and asset distribution procedures.

A trust structure includes three compulsory elements: the settlor, the trustee, and the beneficiary. In some cases, a trust protector is added, an independent person controlling the trustee’s actions. This approach allows flexible asset distribution, protection from external risks, and ensures long-term succession planning.
The trust deed is a key document that records asset transfer, management, and distribution conditions. At COREDO, special attention is paid to the legal clarity and structure of this document, as it determines the trust structure’s resilience to external challenges and compliance checks.

Who are the settlor, beneficiary, and trustee?

The settlor of a trust is the person initiating the trust creation and transferring assets into fiduciary management. In international practice, the settlor can be either an individual or a legal entity, allowing trust funds to be used for corporate, family, and charitable purposes.
The beneficiary of a trust is the ultimate beneficiary on whose behalf trust management is conducted. Beneficial ownership can be either direct or discretionary, where the trustee independently determines the size and timing of asset distribution.
The trustee is a professional participant with fiduciary responsibility for managing assets strictly according to the trust deed and the jurisdiction’s legislation. In complex structures, a trust protector is appointed with the right to control and replace the trustee, increasing protection for the settlor’s and beneficiaries’ interests.

How does a trust fund work?

The trust structure is built on the principle of separating legal title and economic benefit: assets legally belong to the trustee, but economic benefit belongs to the beneficiaries. This mechanism protects assets from the settlor’s creditors, corporate disputes, and external claims.

In COREDO’s practice, multilayered management trust structures are often implemented, where the trust protector provides additional control, and asset distribution occurs according to pre-agreed scenarios. This is especially relevant for international holdings, family offices, and projects with high regulatory risks.

Trust Fund: Functions and Advantages

Illustration for the section 'Trust Fund: Functions and Advantages' in the article 'Trust Fund – Structure, Functions, and Simple Explanation'
A trust fund performs several key functions that make it an indispensable tool for businesses and private clients:

  • Asset protection through a trust: assets transferred into a trust are removed from the settlor’s ownership and become inaccessible to creditors, lawsuits, and corporate conflicts.
  • Succession planning with a trust: a trust allows for the predetermined distribution of assets among heirs, minimizing dispute risks and tax losses.
  • Tax optimization with a trust: a well-crafted trust structure can significantly reduce the tax burden by utilizing preferential regimes and international tax planning.
  • Confidentiality and management flexibility: trust funds provide a high level of privacy for beneficiaries and allow quick responses to changes in legislation and market conditions.

Trust and inheritance: how to protect assets

In one of COREDO’s cases, when structuring a family trust fund in Singapore for the owner of a technology company, it was possible to protect assets from claims by former partners and optimize capital transfer to the next generation without lengthy legal procedures. This approach is especially in demand in jurisdictions with high levels of corporate and political risks.

Tax optimization and data protection

Trust funds in Luxembourg and Malta allow the use of tax optimization mechanisms while maintaining beneficiary confidentiality. In some jurisdictions, for example, in Singapore and the UAE, information disclosure about beneficiaries is limited only to AML and KYC requirements, ensuring a balance between transparency and privacy.
COREDO’s practice confirms that a properly structured trust deed minimizes tax risks and ensures compliance with international disclosure standards.
Thus, creating trust structures requires deep understanding of asset management and control mechanisms, especially important when using corporate trusts.

Corporate trusts: what are they and how do they work?

Corporate trust: an effective tool for managing holdings, investment portfolios, and M&A projects. In one of COREDO’s projects, during the restructuring of an international holding with assets in the EU and Asia, a trust structure was implemented to centralize management, reduce operating costs, and increase investment appeal for new partners.

Types of Trust Funds in the EU, Asia, and Africa

Illustration for the section 'Types of Trust Funds in the EU, Asia, and Africa' in the article 'Trust Fund – Structure, Functions, and Simple Explanation'
Registering a trust fund is possible in most developed jurisdictions. However, the requirements for structure, taxation, and information disclosure significantly differ.

Family, corporate, or charitable trust – differences

  • A family trust fund is used for managing family capital, estate planning, and protecting assets from creditors.
  • A corporate trust is applied for optimizing business ownership structure, managing investments, and conducting M&A deals.
  • A charitable trust is intended for funding social, educational, and cultural projects, as well as implementing corporate social responsibility (CSR).
In COREDO’s practice, family and corporate trusts are often integrated with family office and private banking, ensuring comprehensive capital management and long-term development strategy.

How to choose a jurisdiction for a trust?

Jurisdiction Taxation Disclosure Requirements Maintenance Cost Asset Protection Level
Luxembourg Preferential regime Moderate High Very high
Malta Moderate Average Medium High
Singapore Preferential Minimum Medium High
UAE None Very low High Maximum
Mauritius Preferential Low Low Medium
Seychelles Preferential Minimal Low Medium
When choosing a trust jurisdiction, the COREDO team analyzes not only tax rates but also compliance requirements, asset protection levels, and legal support costs.

Trust Fund Registration – Support

Illustration for the section 'Trust Fund Registration – Support' in the article 'Trust Fund – Structure, Functions, and Simple Explanation'
Creating a trust fund is a multistage process requiring a deep understanding of local and international law, as well as modern AML and KYC requirements.

How to create a trust fund: step by step

  1. Goal and task analysis: determining the trust’s objectives (asset protection, estate planning, investments).
  2. Jurisdiction selection: assessment of tax, legal, and compliance risks.
  3. Trust deed development: drafting a detailed agreement taking into account asset distribution features and beneficiaries’ rights.
  4. Appointment of trustee and protector: selection of professional participants with impeccable reputations.
  5. Registration of the trust: submitting documents to the registering authority, passing Due Diligence and KYC procedures.
  6. Opening bank accounts and integration with other structures: ensuring the trust’s operational activities.
In one of COREDO’s cases, when creating a trust in Asia for an international startup, a phased approach was implemented, including preliminary asset audit, development of a multilayered trust structure, and integration with a family office.
Thus, special attention is paid to compliance and KYC requirements at every stage of trust creation and operation, which becomes a key element of subsequent structure management.

Compliance and KYC for trust structures

Modern jurisdictions have strict compliance requirements, including mandatory beneficiary information disclosure, KYC implementation, and regular AML standard compliance checks. The EU and Asia have unified beneficiary registers, and in some countries (e.g., Malta and Luxembourg), due diligence procedures are mandatory for all trust participants.
The solution developed at COREDO provides for the implementation of automated compliance systems and the digitalization of KYC processes, allowing operational risks to be reduced and trust fund registration for international companies to be accelerated.

Costs and mistakes in creating a trust

The cost of trust maintenance consists of legal support expenses, trustee services, audit, and compliance. On average, according to PwC and EY, annual costs range from 0.5% to 2% of asset value, depending on the jurisdiction and structure complexity.
The most common mistakes faced by the COREDO team when supporting clients:

  • Underestimating beneficiary information disclosure requirements;
  • Choosing an unsuitable jurisdiction without considering asset specifics;
  • Errors in trust deed formulations, leading to disputes between participants;
  • Ignoring modern AML and KYC requirements.

Trust Fund Risks for Entrepreneurs

Illustration for the section 'Trust Fund Risks for Entrepreneurs' in the article 'Trust Fund – Structure, Functions, and Simple Explanation'
Despite the obvious advantages, trust funds carry certain risks and limitations that must be considered during their creation and management.

Transparency and Beneficiary Disclosure

In recent years, international regulators have strengthened transparency requirements for trust structures. In the EU, the AMLD5 Directive obliges the disclosure of beneficiary information in special registers. In Asia and Africa, requirements range from minimal to very strict, depending on the jurisdiction.
COREDO’s practice shows: to minimize risks, it is important to prepare a complete set of documents in advance and ensure all trust participants comply with compliance requirements.

Legal and Tax Risks Abroad

Key legal risks are associated with the possibility of challenging asset transfer into a trust, particularly in bankruptcy or legal disputes. Tax risks include the possibility of double taxation and improper use of preferential regimes.
In one of COREDO’s cases, when creating a trust for an international holding in Luxembourg, a comprehensive audit of tax consequences was conducted, allowing for the avoidance of tax authority claims and ensuring the long-term stability of the structure.
This is especially relevant when considering practical issues of using a trust in business.

Trust Fund for Business: How to Use?

Effective use of a trust fund requires not only sound legal work but also a strategic approach to management and integration with other tools.

Criteria for Selecting a Manager

The trustee is a key figure in a trust structure. Selection criteria for a trustee include:

  • Impeccable business reputation and experience in the chosen jurisdiction;
  • Possession of a license and compliance with regulatory requirements;
  • Flexibility in management and readiness to implement modern technologies;
  • Transparency and readiness for regular audits.
The COREDO team recommends careful due diligence when selecting a trustee, using both international ratings and independent audits.

Integration of Trust Fund with Capital

Trust funds effectively integrate with family offices, private banking, investment portfolios, and corporate structures. This approach centralizes capital management, increases financial planning efficiency, and ensures asset management continuity.
In one of COREDO’s projects for a family office in Singapore, a trust structure was integrated with an investment portfolio and a private banking system, ensuring maximum flexibility and protecting beneficiaries’ interests.

Modern Technologies for Trust Management

Modern technologies are an integral part of efficient trust fund management. Automation of due diligence, digital platforms for compliance, and online asset management reduce costs and improve transparency.
Solutions implemented by COREDO include using specialized programs for transaction monitoring, KYC procedure automation, and corporate documentation management, which are especially important for international companies with high regulatory requirements.

Practical Steps for Entrepreneurs

A trust fund is a powerful tool for asset protection, estate and tax planning, business structure management, and enhancing investment attractiveness. However, its effectiveness depends on proper jurisdiction selection, competent legal support, and adherence to modern compliance requirements.

Checklist for choosing a trust structure:

  1. Clearly define the trust’s objectives (asset protection, estate planning, investments).
  2. Analyze tax and legal risks in potential jurisdictions.
  3. Prepare a detailed trust deed considering all asset distribution scenarios.
  4. Conduct due diligence and select a professional trustee with an impeccable reputation.
  5. Ensure compliance with AML, KYC, and beneficiary information disclosure requirements.
  6. Integrate the trust structure with other capital management tools.
  7. Use modern technologies for compliance automation and asset management.
The COREDO team is ready to offer comprehensive solutions for registering, supporting, and managing trust funds in the EU, Asia, and Africa, leveraging deep practical experience and knowledge of international standards. If you are looking for a reliable partner for strategic business development and capital protection, contact us for a consultation to receive an individual solution that matches your goals and objectives.

In a world where the assets under management of a single company exceed the GDP of most countries, traditional notions of financial market influence require reevaluation. Today, BlackRock, the largest investment company in the world, manages assets amounting to nearly $10 trillion, which equates to almost 10% of all global financial assets.

This scale makes BlackRock not just an investment giant but a systemic player capable of influencing asset values, shaping global investment trends, and even participating in market regulation in the EU, Asia, and other regions.
For international business, especially for corporate clients and institutional investors, this not only opens up unique opportunities but also presents new risks to consider – from investment activity transparency to compliance and AML management in an increasingly digitalized world. What are the real benefits of working with BlackRock? What risks does asset concentration in one company pose? And how can the potential of such a partner be utilized for portfolio scaling and entry into new markets?

In this article, I, Nikita Veremeev, founder of COREDO, offer not just an overview of the BlackRock phenomenon but a practical guide for executives and financial directors seeking reliable and strategically sound solutions for international business. Ahead: an in-depth analysis of the structure, strategies, risks, and opportunities of the world’s largest investment company, as well as practical recommendations based on COREDO’s experience with corporate clients in the EU, Asia, and the CIS. Read the article to the end for answers to key questions and tools for decision-making in the new financial reality.

BlackRock: Company Structure and Scale

Illustration for the section 'BlackRock: Company Structure and Scale' in the article 'BlackRock – It Owns Everything: A Discussion on the Largest Investment Company in the World'
BlackRock is the largest investment company in the world, managing vast volumes of assets and influencing global financial markets. Let’s take a closer look at BlackRock’s structure and business areas to understand how such a scale and efficiency are achieved.

BlackRock’s Structure and Activities

BlackRock’s structure: a complex ecosystem with over 70 offices in 30 countries, offering a wide range of investment solutions for corporate clients, institutional investors, and individuals. The core activities include asset management, launching and administering investment funds, alternative investments, and developing digital platforms for investors.

The key element of BlackRock’s structure is investment funds, both traditional (stocks, bonds, mixed portfolios) and exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which provide liquidity and transparency for investors worldwide. The development of alternative investments, from private equity to infrastructure projects and digital assets, allows BlackRock to support global portfolio diversification and offer innovative financial instruments demanded in European, Asian, and Middle Eastern markets.

COREDO’s practice confirms: for corporate clients considering international expansion or asset diversification, BlackRock’s structure becomes a benchmark for institutional investing with a focus on transparency, compliance, and sustainable development.

BlackRock’s Assets: Dynamics and Structure

Assets under management (AUM) at BlackRock are a key indicator of the company’s scale and influence. As of 2025, BlackRock’s AUM exceeds $9.8 trillion, making it the largest asset manager in the world. The dynamic AUM reflects a steady net inflow of investments, driven by institutional investors and the popularity of ETFs and alternative assets among corporate clients.

The distribution of assets under management demonstrates strategic diversification: about 55% are in the US markets, 30% in Europe and the UK, and the rest in Asia and other regions. This approach allows BlackRock to effectively manage market volatility and ensure long-term investment trends for clients.

In COREDO’s recent cases involving European companies entering Asian markets, portfolio diversification through BlackRock products helped reduce risks and provide steady returns even in high-volatility conditions of the S&P 500 and other indices.

BlackRock’s Capital and Resilience

BlackRock’s financial resilience is confirmed not only by the volume of AUM but also by equity and return on equity (ROE) metrics. By the end of 2024, BlackRock’s equity exceeded $40 billion, and ROE remains stable at around 15–18%. The company’s financial statements comply with international IFRS standards, ensuring transparency for corporate clients and regulators.

The use of leverage in BlackRock’s investment strategies is strictly controlled by internal and external auditors, minimizing systemic risks and supporting financial stability even during market shocks.

COREDO’s experience shows that for large legal entities considering long-term investments, the financial resilience of a partner becomes a key criterion when choosing an asset management company.

BlackRock’s Investment Strategies

Illustration for the section 'BlackRock's Investment Strategies' in the article 'BlackRock – It Owns Everything: A Discussion on the Largest Investment Company in the World'
BlackRock’s investment strategies cover a wide range of approaches, from diversified portfolios to specialized solutions for individual sectors and sustainable (ESG) investments. Thanks to its scale and technological leadership, BlackRock offers tools for investors with different goals and risk levels, using both traditional and innovative strategies.

BlackRock’s Investment Strategies

BlackRock offers a wide range of investment strategies tailored to the needs of corporate clients and institutional investors, including index and active funds, multi-asset solutions, and innovative ETFs that ensure flexibility and liquidity. For international businesses, products focused on global diversification and portfolio volatility reduction are of particular value.

Solutions developed at COREDO for clients in the EU and Asia often include combining traditional and alternative BlackRock instruments to optimize portfolio structure considering jurisdiction and industry specifics.

Alternative Investments and Digital Assets

Alternative investments, one of the fastest-growing segments in BlackRock’s structure, actively developing private equity, infrastructure projects, real estate, and, importantly for modern corporate clients, digital assets.

Using digital platforms for investors and automating investment analysis allows BlackRock to offer solutions that meet the highest standards of efficiency and transparency.

In COREDO’s practice, cases of entering new markets through BlackRock’s alternative investments have shown high portfolio resilience even during market turbulence.

For businesses, this means not only access to innovative financial instruments but also the ability to scale the investment pipeline following global trends.

BlackRock’s Role in ESG Investing

BlackRock’s involvement in ESG investing and sustainable development is not just a declaration but a strategic priority realized through the integration of ESG factors into investment decisions and corporate governance. The company leads in implementing sustainable investing standards, reflecting in its portfolio structure and partner ecosystems.

COREDO’s practice shows,

that for corporate clients from Europe and Asia, ESG standard compliance becomes an integral part of Due Diligence and an investment attractiveness factor. BlackRock provides ESG funds and tools, enabling companies not just to meet regulatory requirements but to build a reputation as a responsible global market player.

BlackRock: Risk Management and AML

Illustration for the section 'BlackRock: Risk Management and AML' in the article 'BlackRock – It Owns Everything: A Discussion on the Largest Investment Company in the World'
BlackRock, a world leader in risk management and AML compliance (anti-money laundering), sets industry standards. This article discusses how BlackRock implements advanced approaches to investment risk management and uses digital solutions to enhance transparency and efficiency.

Risk Management in Investments and Digitalization

Effective risk management: the foundation of BlackRock’s investment activities. At the center of the management system is the proprietary platform Aladdin, combining analytics, automation, and artificial intelligence for real-time investment risk assessment and monitoring.

This approach not only minimizes market and operational risks but also ensures transparency for clients and regulators.

COREDO’s experience in supporting international transactions confirms:

integrating BlackRock’s digital solutions into asset management processes significantly reduces error probability, accelerates decision-making, and improves due diligence quality.

Compliance and KYC Standards at BlackRock

BlackRock adheres to the strictest international compliance standards, including AML (Anti-Money Laundering) and KYC (Know Your Customer), crucial for corporate clients operating in multiple jurisdictions. Due diligence procedures, automation of counterparty checks, and the integration of compliance and AML in investment processes minimize regulatory risks and ensure transparency in investment activities.

The COREDO team has implemented projects to support account openings and investments through BlackRock for clients in the EU and Asia, with particular emphasis on regulatory compliance and the implementation of best practices in compliance integration.

Interaction with Regulators in the EU and Asia

BlackRock’s role in regulating European and Asian markets goes beyond the standard interaction of an asset manager with regulators. The company actively participates in shaping regulatory policy, implementing new reporting standards, and promoting sustainable investing.

For businesses, this means not only access to best practices but also the ability to operate within a legal framework meeting the highest international requirements.

COREDO’s practice shows that partnership with BlackRock facilitates the alignment of investment products with EU and Asian regulators, speeds up market entry, and reduces compliance costs.

Opportunities for Corporate Clients

Illustration for the section 'Opportunities for Corporate Clients' in the article 'BlackRock – It Owns Everything: A Discussion on the Largest Investment Company in the World'
Opportunities for corporate clients cover a wide range of solutions aimed at supporting and developing international business. Modern tools allow companies to efficiently manage investments, finances, and corporate structure in a global market environment.

Investment Solutions for International Business

BlackRock offers corporate and legal entities a wide range of investment products: from ETFs and alternative assets to specialized ESG funds and liquidity management solutions. BlackRock’s partner ecosystems include strategic alliances with international banks and funds, enabling companies to implement comprehensive investment strategies.

The COREDO team develops customized solutions for clients, considering jurisdiction, industry, and compliance requirements.

This approach ensures maximum efficiency and transparency in investment processes.

Assessing Investment Profitability with BlackRock

Scaling an investment portfolio with BlackRock is possible through expanding the product line and integrating innovative financial instruments and digital platforms. To assess investment profitability, metrics such as ROI, long-term returns, and portfolio efficiency are used, allowing for strategically sound decisions.

In COREDO’s practice, implementing BlackRock tools for portfolio efficiency assessment helped clients from the EU and Asia enhance reporting transparency and optimize investment structure considering long-term trends.

Business Partner Alliances

BlackRock actively forms strategic alliances with banks, funds, and technology companies, creating partner ecosystems to support corporate clients at all investment cycle stages. For businesses, this opens access to investment pipelines, new markets, and innovative asset management solutions.

Solutions implemented by COREDO in collaboration with BlackRock partners enabled clients to scale their business, reduce transaction support costs, and accelerate international market entry.

Comparative Table of BlackRock Investment Products for Legal Entities

Product Minimum Threshold Main Advantages Risks Compliance Requirements
ETF $100,000 Liquidity, low fees Market volatility KYC, AML
Alternative Assets $500,000 Diversification, yield Low liquidity Due diligence
ESG Funds $200,000 CSR compliance, ESG trends Novelty of instruments ESG reporting

Impact of BlackRock on Financial Markets

Illustration for the section 'Impact of BlackRock on Financial Markets' in the article 'BlackRock – It Owns Everything: A Discussion on the Largest Investment Company in the World'
The impact of BlackRock on financial markets manifests not only in the scale of capital managed but also in its ability to set market trends and shape investor expectations. The company’s expertise spans entire regions, including the EU and Asia, making its solutions key for assessing asset values and market dynamics in these territories.

Asset Values and Market Trends in the EU and Asia

BlackRock significantly influences asset value formation and investment trends in Europe and Asia. The scale of operations and AUM volumes allow the company to dictate investment influx directions, affect stock and bond values, and participate in developing new corporate governance standards.

In COREDO cases accompanying European companies’ entry into Asian markets, partnership with BlackRock provided access to analytics and investment products that considered regional market specifics and minimized global investing risks.

Risks of BlackRock’s Market Dominance

The concentration of assets in the hands of one investment giant creates systemic risks for the global financial market. Key challenges include potential impacts on liquidity, market volatility, and the financial stability of investment companies. Managing reputational risks and adherence to corporate responsibility standards become critically important for all market participants.

COREDO’s experience indicates that for corporate clients, it’s crucial not only to leverage BlackRock’s scale advantages but also to diversify partnerships to minimize potential risks associated with one company’s dominance.

BlackRock and Competitors: Comparison

A comparative analysis of investment companies confirms BlackRock’s uniqueness in AUM volume, product line breadth, and digitalization level of investment management. However, for corporate clients, it is important to consider not only scale but also service quality, reporting transparency, solution innovation, and compliance with international compliance standards.

In COREDO’s practice, analyzing BlackRock’s competitive advantages allows recommending this company as a strategic partner for international business, especially in market expansion and ESG standard adherence.

Practical Recommendations for Business

  • Evaluate BlackRock’s investment products considering business specifics, jurisdiction, and long-term goals.
  • Carefully study compliance and AML requirements for corporate clients, integrating best practices into due diligence processes.
  • Leverage portfolio scaling opportunities and BlackRock’s partner programs for market entry and asset diversification.
  • Keep track of BlackRock’s innovations in digitalization and ESG to meet international sustainable development and corporate responsibility standards.
  • Regularly monitor portfolio performance using key metrics ROI, long-term returns, and financial stability, employing BlackRock analytics and tools.
COREDO’s experience shows: strategic partnership with the world’s largest investment company opens new horizons for international business but requires a systematic approach to risk management, compliance, and innovation integration.

This approach ensures sustainable growth and competitiveness in global markets.

In 2024, more than 70% of all cryptocurrency companies operating with European clients faced the need to radically reassess their licensing strategy due to the new MiCA requirements and increased scrutiny from European regulators.

At the same time, the number of applications for FINMA licenses in Switzerland grew by almost one-third, and interest in registering cryptocurrency businesses in Europe reached a historical peak.

Why has this choice become so critical for leaders and owners of crypto companies from the EU, Asia, and CIS? Which regulatory approach, Swiss or European, ensures greater flexibility, transparency, and investment attractiveness?

Today, the question is not simply about obtaining a cryptocurrency license in the EU or Switzerland but about a strategic choice of jurisdiction, which will determine scaling opportunities, access to investments, and business resilience in the ever-changing landscape of cryptocurrency regulation in Europe. How to ensure compliance, protect investors, optimize taxes, and not lose momentum in implementing innovative fintech solutions?

In this article, I will thoroughly analyze the key differences between the Swiss crypto license and MiCA, provide practical recommendations, and offer tools for strategic choice. If you want not just to comply with requirements but to use regulation as a growth driver – read to the end: here, you will find answers to the most pressing market questions.

Cryptocurrency Regulation: Switzerland and MiCA

Illustration for the section 'Cryptocurrency Regulation: Switzerland and MiCA' in the article 'Crypto license in Switzerland or MiCA – requirements comparison'

Cryptocurrency regulation is becoming increasingly relevant against the backdrop of the rapid growth of the industry and new legislative initiatives. Switzerland and the European MiCA regulation offer different approaches: the first focuses on tax clarity and oversight by FINMA, and the second on comprehensive harmonization of rules for all participants in the crypto market. Next, we will consider how these mechanisms are embodied in the requirements for crypto businesses in Switzerland and EU countries.

Regulation of Crypto Business in Switzerland: FINMA and SRO

Switzerland is traditionally perceived as one of the most innovative and flexible jurisdictions for crypto businesses. Regulation here is built on the principle of “technological neutrality” and individual assessment of business models. Two institutions play a key role: FINMA (Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority) and SRO (Self-Regulatory Organization).

For most cryptocurrency companies, including exchanges, brokers, custodial services, STOs, and stablecoin projects, either direct Licensing by FINMA or membership in one of the SROs is required. For example, if a business is related to cryptocurrency exchange or storing digital assets for clients, a financial intermediary or bank license is needed, along with compliance with AML/KYC standards and internal controls.

Practice at COREDO confirms: SRO membership in Switzerland often becomes the optimal solution for startups aiming for a quick market entry with minimal expenses, while a FINMA license is required for scalable and institutional projects with high transparency and investor protection demands.

It is important to note that the types of crypto licenses in Switzerland vary in the scope of allowed operations, capital requirements, and internal controls.

MiCA, Cryptocurrency Regulation in the EU

MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation): this is the world’s first comprehensive regulation that creates unified rules for cryptocurrency companies across all EU countries. Its implementation in 2024-2025 became a key event for cryptocurrency regulation in Europe.

MiCA sets clear standards for the licensing of cryptocurrency exchanges, custodial services, token issuers, and stablecoins, and introduces the concept of an EU passport (passporting), allowing services to be offered across the entire EU territory without the need to obtain separate licenses in each country. This opens up new possibilities for cross-border payments and business scaling.

A key feature of MiCA is its strong focus on investor protection, business transparency, and unified AML/KYC requirements, which necessitates companies to implement comprehensive internal control, Due Diligence procedures, and constant auditing.

The solution developed by COREDO for clients entering the EU market always includes a strategic assessment of MiCA compliance and an analysis of token, security token, and stablecoin regulation prospects.

Requirements for Obtaining a Crypto License in Switzerland

Illustration for the section 'Requirements for Obtaining a Crypto License in Switzerland' in the article 'Crypto License in Switzerland or MiCA – requirements comparison'

The requirements for obtaining a crypto license in Switzerland include a series of mandatory steps and formal conditions for companies planning to work with crypto assets. Even at the initial stage, it’s crucial to choose the correct legal form (AG or GmbH) and ensure compliance with the Swiss regulator FINMA’s requirements.

Registration of AG or GmbH and Application to FINMA

The process of registering a crypto business in Switzerland begins with creating a legal entity – most often this is an AG (joint-stock company) or GmbH (limited liability company). At this stage, it is important to properly structure corporate governance, determine the composition of shareholders, and appoint a compliance officer.

To apply to FINMA or SRO, a comprehensive package of documents is needed: a business plan for the crypto business detailing the business model, financial statements, proof of minimum capital, information about the beneficiaries, internal AML/KYC policies, due diligence procedures, and internal auditing.

In practice, the COREDO team has implemented dozens of such projects for clients from the EU and CIS, ensuring not only legal purity but also strategic flexibility of the corporate structure.

AML/KYC Requirements in Switzerland

AML/KYC policy in Switzerland is built on a combination of national legislation and international FATF standards. Crypto companies are required to implement client identification procedures, transaction monitoring, internal controls, and regular audits.

Special attention is given to due diligence and the transparency of corporate structures, which reduces risks for investors and increases trust from banks.
Compliance for crypto companies in Switzerland: it is not a formality, but a strategic asset.

COREDO’s experience shows that integrating automated KYC tools and building a multilayered internal control system allows not only to meet FINMA/SRO requirements but also significantly speeds up the licensing process.

Minimum Capital and License Cost

The minimum capital for a Crypto License in Switzerland depends on the type of license selected and the business model: for financial intermediaries – from 100,000 CHF, for banking and custodial services – from 300,000 to 10 million CHF. It is important to note that the funds must be placed in Swiss bank accounts and documented.

The timeline for obtaining a license ranges from 3 to 6 months, provided all requirements are met and the document package is correctly prepared.

The cost of licensing is composed of state fees, SRO/FINMA services, and expenses for accompanying the process. In COREDO’s practice, there have been cases where optimizing the corporate structure AG/GmbH significantly reduced costs and expedited the procedure.

Thus, competent company structuring and correct document preparation can significantly simplify obtaining a license. Next, we will consider the main tax advantages for crypto businesses in Switzerland.

Tax Benefits for Crypto Businesses

Switzerland offers unique tax benefits for crypto businesses: low corporate tax rates, no capital gains tax for certain digital asset transactions, and flexible taxation regimes for innovative fintech solutions. Additionally, the developed infrastructure of banking and legal services and a favorable attitude toward the adoption of new blockchain technologies make this jurisdiction especially attractive for international projects.

MiCA Requirements for Cryptocurrency License in the EU

Illustration for the section 'MiCA Requirements for Cryptocurrency License in the EU' in the article 'Crypto License in Switzerland or MiCA – requirements comparison'

MiCA’s requirements for a cryptocurrency license in the EU have become the essential regulations for entering the European crypto asset market. For legal operation, providers and issuers of cryptocurrencies now need to comply with a complex set of standards ensuring transparency, stability, and customer protection.

MiCA Requirements and Licensing

Licensing of cryptocurrency exchanges and other crypto companies in the EU under MiCA begins with preparing a business plan, describing the business model, risk assessment, and developing internal policies for AML/KYC. Companies must confirm the availability of minimum capital (from 125,000 EUR for exchanges), appoint a compliance officer, and implement internal control and corporate governance procedures.

The solution prepared by the COREDO team for clients entering the EU market always includes a strategic assessment of MiCA compliance, analysis of prospects for token and digital asset regulation, and the preparation of documents for submission to national regulators or ESMA.

AML/KYC and Data Protection in Europe

MiCA requires strict adherence to FATF standards, implementation of comprehensive due diligence procedures, continuous transaction monitoring, and regular client checks.

Particular attention is paid to data protection (GDPR), which imposes additional requirements for storing and processing client information.

The compliance officer becomes a key figure in the structure of a crypto company: responsible for implementing and controlling all AML/KYC procedures, interacting with regulators and auditors, as well as employee training.

COREDO’s practice has shown that integrating automated KYC platforms and cloud solutions for internal control significantly reduces operational risks and accelerates the licensing process.

Regulation of Stablecoins and Tokens under MiCA

MiCA introduces a clear classification of tokens: utility tokens, asset-referenced tokens, e-money tokens, and security tokens. Separate requirements are provided for the disclosure of information, investor protection, fund reservation, and internal controls for each type.

Stablecoin regulation becomes especially strict: issuers are required to meet requirements for reserves, transparency, and auditing, and provide regular reports to regulators.

The COREDO team has delivered projects for STO and stablecoin licensing in the EU, enabling clients not only to meet new requirements but also to attract institutional investors through high transparency and asset protection levels.

Advantages of MiCA for Investors

One of MiCA’s key advantages is the opportunity for passporting, the provision of services in all EU countries based on a single license. This greatly simplifies crypto business scaling, reduces compliance costs, and opens access to new markets and investors.

Additionally, unified regulatory standards increase trust from banks and institutional partners, which positively impacts the companies’ investment attractiveness.

Swiss Crypto License and MiCA: Differences

Criterion Switzerland (FINMA/SRO) EU (MiCA)
Regulator FINMA, SRO National regulators, ESMA
Capital Requirements From 100,000 CHF From 125,000 EUR
AML/KYC Strict, SRO/FINMA Strict, MiCA/FATF
Licensing Timeline 3-6 months 6-12 months
Passporting No Yes
Tax Benefits Yes, flexible Depends on the country
Scaling Flexible, but outside the EU Easy within the EU
Innovation High Regulated
Advantages Reputation, flexibility Unified market, passporting
Risks Cross-border restrictions Strict regulation

Registration of Crypto Business: Choice of Jurisdiction

Illustration for the section 'Registration of Crypto Business: Choice of Jurisdiction' in the article 'Crypto License in Switzerland or MiCA – requirements comparison'

Registration of a crypto business: choice of jurisdiction is one of the key stages for a successful start and further development in the digital asset industry. The choice of country affects licensing requirements, tax burden, and the company’s scaling opportunities. In the following sections, we will consider the registration features of crypto companies in popular jurisdictions like Switzerland and EU countries (MiCA).

Switzerland or EU (MiCA): How to Choose?

The choice between MiCA and the Swiss license depends on the business model, target markets, and investment goals of the company.

For startups aiming for a quick launch and innovative fintech solutions, Switzerland is often more attractive due to regulatory flexibility and tax optimization.

However, for scalable projects focused on the European market and cross-border payments, the advantages of MiCA and European passporting become crucial.

The COREDO team recommends conducting a strategic analysis of jurisdictions, considering the prospects of introducing new blockchain technologies, banking license requirements for crypto businesses, and long-term goals for attracting investments.

Risks and Prospects of Crypto Companies

The implementation of MiCA brings both new opportunities and risks for existing crypto companies.

Among the key challenges are the increase in compliance costs, the need to restructure internal processes, the risks of non-compliance with AML/KYC, and potential restrictions on innovative products.

For companies already licensed in Switzerland, transitioning to MiCA may require additional business model adaptation and internal policy adjustments.

COREDO’s experience shows that timely preparation for new requirements and the integration of international FATF standards can minimize reputational and operational risks, as well as increase ROI by optimizing expense structures and tax burdens.

Examples of Successful Licensing

In 2023, the COREDO team supported the licensing of a cryptocurrency exchange with an international AG structure in Switzerland for a startup from the CIS. Through the smart design of a business plan, the integration of automated KYC tools, and the establishment of a transparent internal control system, the company not only successfully completed the FINMA application submission process but also attracted a strategic investor from the EU.

Another case: preparing an STO platform for licensing under MiCA: a comprehensive due diligence program was implemented, an investor protection policy was developed, and compliance with new token and stablecoin regulation requirements was ensured. As a result, the client obtained a European financial services passport and entered new markets.

Practical Tips for Entrepreneurs

Illustration for the section 'Practical Tips for Entrepreneurs' in the article 'Crypto License in Switzerland or MiCA – requirements comparison'

– Checklist for document preparation:

  • Founding documents of AG/GmbH (for Switzerland) or a similar structure in the EU
  • Business plan with a description of the business model, financial flows, and compliance strategy
  • Internal AML/KYC policies, due diligence procedures, and internal controls
  • Proof of minimum capital and its origin sources
  • Appointment of a compliance officer and description of corporate governance
  • Documents for application submission to FINMA/SRO or national EU regulator

tips for choosing a jurisdiction:

  • Evaluate target markets, expense structure, and scaling requirements
  • Analyze tax regimes and optimization opportunities
  • Consider the prospects for introducing new technologies and innovation requirements
  • Explore the possibility of passporting for accessing EU markets

– Mistakes and pitfalls:

  • Underestimating AML/KYC and internal control requirements
  • Errors in corporate governance structure and appointment of responsible personnel
  • Untimely adaptation of the business model to new MiCA requirements
  • Ignoring tax specifics and cross-border restrictions

– How to ensure compliance and investor protection:

  • Implement automated KYC/AML solutions
  • Build a multilayered internal control and regular audit system
  • Ensure corporate structure transparency and information disclosure for investors
  • Organize employee training and constant monitoring of legislative changes

– Recommendations for choosing a consulting partner:

  • Evaluate the team’s licensing experience in the chosen jurisdiction
  • Check for successful cases and expertise in compliance, taxes, and corporate governance
  • Ensure transparency of processes and comprehensive support at all stages

Crypto License Switzerland or MiCA, What to Choose?

The choice between MiCA and Swiss regulation: is a strategic decision that determines not only compliance with requirements but also growth potential, investment attractiveness, and business stability. For companies focused on innovation, flexibility, and tax optimization, Switzerland remains one of the best options. For scalable projects targeting the European market, passporting, and institutional investors, MiCA’s advantages become evident.

COREDO’s practice shows that the optimal result is achieved only through a comprehensive analysis of the business model, goals, and risks, as well as through competent support at all stages of registration and licensing. In the conditions of constantly changing cryptocurrency regulation in Europe, strategic analysis of jurisdictions and timely adaptation to new standards become key success factors for international crypto businesses.

Every day over 90 million barrels of oil are sold worldwide, and just about 100 companies control more than 80% of that volume. While global oil trade shapes state budgets and determines the stability of world financial markets, entering the oil market remains nearly inaccessible for new players. Why is international oil trade one of the most closed and regulated industries? What barriers and risks await entrepreneurs who decide to enter this market, and how can they be overcome?

Anyone considering registering an oil company in the EU, Asia, or Africa faces multi-layered legal, compliance, and operational obstacles. The complexities with oil trade licensing, financial monitoring, control of funds origin, and the need for beneficiary transparency are just the tip of the iceberg. Ignoring these aspects can lead not only to investment loss but also to long-term sanctions or reputational consequences.
In this article, I will analyze in detail why the oil business is considered closed, what real barriers and risks exist for new players, and how the COREDO team assists clients not only in entering this market but also in building a sustainable, compliance-oriented business model. If you’re looking for more than superficial advice, but rather an in-depth analysis and practical solutions, I recommend reading to the end.

Oil Business: Why It Is Closed

Illustration for the section 'Oil Business: Why It Is Closed' in the article 'Why Oil Trade Is Considered a Closed Business'

The oil business is traditionally considered one of the most closed and difficult industries to enter. The reasons for this lie not only in high barriers and specific market rules but also in the unique structure of the oil market and the role of its main participants.

Structure of the Oil Market and Its Participants

International oil trade is a complex chain that includes oil extraction, transportation, trading, and export. At each stage, its own rules apply, and access to infrastructure and raw materials is controlled by a limited circle of participants. Major state-owned oil companies (NOCs) such as Saudi Aramco, ADNOC, CNPC, as well as global oil traders (Vitol, Glencore, Trafigura) form the core of the market. Their corporate structures for oil trading often include subsidiaries in key jurisdictions, specialized oil trading platforms, and a network of financial intermediaries.

In COREDO’s practice, there have been cases where even having direct contracts with suppliers didn’t guarantee successful market entry without access to logistics chains, terminals, and bank guarantees. For new players, not only is capital critical, but also strategic alliances that allow integration into the existing ecosystem of raw material trading.

Entry Barriers for New Companies

Entering the oil market requires significant investments: merely ensuring minimum supplies and insuring logistics can amount to tens of millions of dollars. Licensing oil trade in the EU, Asia, and Africa involves going through complex procedures, including corporate structure verification for oil trading, having qualified personnel, and implementing compliance systems.

The COREDO team has completed projects registering oil companies in the EU and Asia, where the key obstacle was not only the financial threshold but also the need to confirm the transparency of fund sources and market experience. Competition among traders stimulates the formation of strategic alliances, without which access to infrastructure and large contracts is practically impossible.

Geopolitics and Economics: Key Factors

Geopolitical risks and international sanctions directly impact oil trade restrictions. Trade embargoes, oil export duties, and currency control in several countries make the market inaccessible to companies without stable international connections and compliance expertise.

A real case from COREDO: a client faced payment blocking when exporting oil to Asia due to tightened currency control and changes in international sanctions lists. The solution developed at COREDO included a comprehensive check of the counterparties chain and the implementation of alternative financing tools.

Legal Barriers in Oil Trade

Illustration for the section 'Legal Barriers in Oil Trade' in the article 'Why Oil Trade Is Considered a Closed Business'

Legal barriers in oil trade are influenced by various national and international regulations that often complicate companies’ entry into global markets and determine rules of competition and access to infrastructure. The peculiarities of oil market regulation in the EU, Asia, and Africa directly affect trade mechanisms and the strategic planning of industry participants.

The impact of these features requires a more detailed review of the specific regulatory conditions in each of the mentioned regions.

Regulation of the Oil Market in the EU, Asia, and Africa

Registering oil companies in the EU, Asia, and Africa requires accounting for national and international regulatory standards of the oil market. In the EU, key regulators include ESMA and national financial authorities, in Asia – MAS (Singapore), FSC (Hong Kong), and in Africa – specialized agencies and ministries of energy. Licensing requirements for oil trade include not only capital source confirmation but also implementing compliance procedures in accordance with EU AML directives and FATF recommendations.

At COREDO, we accompany clients at all stages of oil company registration, developing individual strategies considering jurisdiction specifics. For example, registering an oil company in Singapore requires a local director and corporate secretary and a comprehensive check of all beneficiaries and funds sources.

Table: Comparison of Requirements for Oil Company Registration

Jurisdiction Minimum Capital License Local Director AML/KYC Registration Time
EU €50,000+ Yes Yes Yes 2-4 weeks
Singapore $1 Yes Yes Yes 1-2 weeks
Africa $10,000+ Yes Depends on country Yes 3-8 weeks

AML and KYC for Oil Companies

AML for oil companies is not a formality but a key element of access to international oil trade. EU directives and FATF recommendations require the implementation of mandatory KYC procedures for oil traders, regular financial monitoring, and funds origin control in the oil business.
COREDO’s practice confirms: even minimal non-compliance with standards can lead to account blockages and the inability to conduct SWIFT payments.

In 2024, AML requirements for oil companies have tightened significantly: new standards for beneficiary identification have appeared, the lists of suspicious operations have expanded, and control over shell companies has intensified. Our experience at COREDO showed that implementing automated transaction monitoring systems and regular audits of oil deals are the best practices for minimizing compliance risks.

Beneficiary Transparency, How to Verify Sources of Funds

Modern regulation requires disclosing all hidden beneficiaries in the oil business, combating the use of shell companies, and implementing mechanisms for controlling fund sources. Financial investigations are becoming standard practice when registering oil companies in the EU and Asia.

The solutions developed at COREDO include comprehensive verifications of corporate structure, analysis of beneficial ownership, and the implementation of transaction transparency tools.

Risks of Sanctions Evasion for Oil Traders

Illustration for the section 'Risks of Sanctions Evasion for Oil Traders' in the article 'Why Oil Trade Is Considered a Closed Business'

Risks of sanctions evasion for oil traders are becoming increasingly relevant against the backdrop of tightening international restrictions and expanding sanctions lists. Using evasion schemes helps maintain export volumes but is accompanied by additional costs and increases legal and reputational risks for market participants.

Next, we will consider how sanctions and embargoes affect oil export and the activities of oil traders.

Sanctions and Embargoes: Impact on Oil Export

Export sanctions on oil and trade embargoes are major factors making the market closed to new companies. International sanctions by the EU, USA, UK, and a number of Asian countries limit access to financing, logistics, and even to oil trading platforms. Violating the sanctions regime leads not only to financial but also criminal consequences, as well as long-term reputational risks.

In COREDO’s practice, there were cases where even indirect involvement in transactions with sanctioned countries led to account blockages and banks denying services. Compliance Due Diligence and oil deal audits become mandatory elements for all market participants.
Under such strict restrictions, market participants are forced to develop alternative business methods,including schemes for oil re-export and sanctions evasion.

Schemes for Oil Re-export and Sanctions Evasion

Despite the tightening of control, sanctions evasion schemes in oil trade continue to be used: offshore schemes, oil re-export through third countries, alternative supply routes, SWIFT payments through affiliated banks, bank guarantees in oil deals. On the other hand, such schemes carry high legal and reputational risks.

Table: Common Sanctions Evasion Schemes and Their Risks

Scheme Description Main Risks
Offshore Companies Using shell companies Financial investigations, account blocking
Re-export through Third Countries Supplying oil through neutral countries Violation of sanctions, criminal liability
Alternative Payments Using SWIFT/alternative currencies Transaction blocking, bank denial
COREDO’s practice shows that sustainable business models are built not on circumventing restrictions, but on transparency and compliance.

Legal and Reputational Risks – What Are They?

Long-term consequences of violating the sanctions regime include not only fines but also loss of access to financial markets, inability to conclude strategic alliances, and deterioration of ESG indicators. Managing reputational risks in the oil sector requires implementing compliance standards, regular audits, and transparency of the corporate structure.

Tax Risks in the Oil Business

Illustration for the section 'Tax Risks in the Oil Business' in the article 'Why Oil Trade Is Considered a Closed Business'

Tax risks in the oil business are becoming more significant every year due to tighter tax regulations and the revision of industry benefits. In these conditions, optimizing company structure in oil trading becomes a key tool for minimizing tax losses and maintaining financial sustainability.

Optimizing Company Structure in Oil Trading

The right corporate structure for oil trading: a key to asset protection and minimizing tax risks. Depending on jurisdiction, registering oil companies offshore can provide flexibility but requires strict adherence to tax residency requirements and beneficiary disclosure.
The COREDO team develops individual schemes, considering the specificities of international oil trade, corporate governance requirements, and protection from financial investigations.

Scheme: Corporate Structure for International Oil Trading

  • Holding company (EU/Asia)
  • Operating company (offshore/Asia)
  • Trading platform
  • Bank accounts in EU/Asia/Africa

Tax Risks in Financial Reporting

Tax risks for oil companies include double taxation, financial reporting requirements, and mandatory audit of oil deals. The EU and Asia are strengthening control over transfer pricing and financial transparency.

Solutions implemented by COREDO allow minimizing the tax burden through the right choice of jurisdiction, implementation of international reporting standards, and regular audits.

Financing in Oil Deals

Financing oil deals requires using oil derivatives, engaging financial intermediaries, and adhering to currency control. Under sanctions and restrictions, classic tools (letters of credit, bank guarantees) are complemented by alternative settlement schemes. COREDO’s practice confirms: diversifying financing instruments and implementing compliance procedures ensure financial security and business model sustainability.

How to Enter the Oil Market with Minimal Risks

Illustration for the section 'How to Enter the Oil Market with Minimal Risks' in the article 'Why Oil Trade Is Considered a Closed Business'

Entering the oil market is inevitably associated with high volatility and numerous specific risks, so minimizing losses requires a systematic and conscious approach to each activity stage. One of the key tools for risk reduction: thorough counterparty verification and conducting due diligence, which will help avoid costly mistakes at the market entry stage.

Counterparty Verification: How to Conduct Due Diligence

Compliance due diligence – a basic element for new oil market participants. Modern technologies allow tracking oil origin, conducting KYC procedures for oil traders, and identifying hidden beneficiaries.
At COREDO, we implement automated counterparty verification systems, significantly reducing fraud and compliance violation risks.

Checklist: Compliance Procedures for Oil Traders

  • Identification and verification of beneficiaries
  • Funds origin verification
  • Transaction monitoring
  • Regular audits and KYC file updates

Legal Support and Compliance – Recommendations

Choosing a jurisdiction, registration support, compliance procedure implementation, and financial monitoring – key elements of a successful market entry. COREDO’s experience shows that integrating legal support of oil deals with compliance expertise allows not only passing licensing but also building lasting relationships with banks and partners.

How to Scale a Business Model?

Scaling the oil business in Asia and Africa involves particular challenges: regulatory differences, infrastructure instability, high demands on ESG factors. COREDO solutions include developing strategic alliances, implementing sustainable business model standards, and regular compliance risk assessments.

Recommendations for Entrepreneurs

Entering the international oil trade market is not only a matter of capital but also a deep understanding of legal, compliance, and operational barriers. Main challenges: oil trade licensing, registering oil companies in the EU, Asia, and Africa, implementing AML/KYC procedures, managing reputational risks, and minimizing tax burden.

COREDO’s practice confirms: a comprehensive approach, including legal support for oil deals, compliance in the oil industry, and international standards implementation, allows not only entering the closed market but also building a sustainable, transparent, and profitable oil business.

Prospects for oil trading development amid global changes: belong to those companies that invest in compliance, ESG, and process digitalization. If you are looking for a reliable partner for registration, licensing, and support of an oil company in the EU, Asia, or Africa – COREDO solutions will help realize even the most ambitious tasks, minimizing risks and ensuring long-term success.

In 2024, the average cost of a single trade secret breach for an international company exceeded $4.45 million, with 62% of incidents linked to insider risks and industrial espionage (according to IBM, European Union Intellectual Property Office, JETRO). These numbers are not just impressive; they underscore that trade secrets are no longer an abstract concept but a tangible strategic asset crucial for competitive advantage, business valuation, and resilience in international markets.

Amidst tightening trade secret legislation, rising cyber threats, and globalization of business processes, protecting confidential information becomes essential for companies operating in the EU, Asia, and CIS. How to establish an effective trade secret regime in an international structure? Which measures effectively counter leaks and industrial espionage? How to integrate AML and compliance requirements into a unified corporate policy? I will address these and other questions in this article, drawing on COREDO’s practical experience in company registration, obtaining financial licenses, and business support across various jurisdictions.

If you want to not only understand the nuances of legislation but also receive step-by-step recommendations for building a trade secret protection system, I recommend reading the material to the end.

Trade Secrets – What They Are and Their Types

Illustration for the section 'Trade Secrets - What They Are and Their Types' in the article 'Trade Secrets – What They Are and How Protection is Ensured'

Trade secrets are not just a set of secret information but a special management regime of confidential information that ensures a company a sustainable competitive advantage and protects it from unfair competition.

At COREDO, we often encounter clients who confuse trade secrets with other types of confidential information, leading to errors in organizing internal access control and forming corporate security policies.

For more effective information protection, it is important to understand which laws and standards regulate trade secrets and confidentiality matters.

Trade Secrets: Laws and Standards

In different jurisdictions, trade secret legislation is based on similar principles but differs in details. The EU has Directive 2016/943, which outlines minimal standards for trade secret protection, as well as GDPR and ISO 27001, which set frameworks for data and information security management. Singapore, the UK, Czech Republic, and Estonia have their own laws and regulatory acts governing features of trade secrets, protection measures, and liability for disclosure.

In COREDO’s practice, when registering companies in the EU and Asia, we always recommend clients conduct an audit of local requirements and adapt internal trade secret regulations considering national specifics.

Types of Trade Secrets and Protection Features

Key features of trade secrets:

  • The information has actual or potential commercial value.
  • It is not publicly accessible.
  • A trade secret regime is applied (organizational, technical, and legal measures).
  • Information can be expressed in any form: from technological processes to client databases and business strategies.
In COREDO projects, we classify confidential information by criticality levels and assign different protection measures for trade secrets, personal data, know-how, and intellectual property.

Trade Secrets vs. Confidential Information: What’s the Difference?

Trade secrets are different from other types of confidential information (such as personal data or trade secrets) not only in characteristics but also in the protection regime. NDA (non-disclosure agreement) and internal regulations are basic tools, but a stricter organization is required for trade secrets: access restriction, digital document marking, implementation of data storage and destruction policy, as well as regular audits.

Therefore, effective protection requires a systematic approach combining organizational, technical, and legal measures, which we will discuss further.

Trade Secret Protection – Main Measures

Effective trade secret protection is impossible without a comprehensive approach combining organizational, technical, and compliance measures. COREDO’s practice confirms: only the integration of these elements allows the creation of a sustainable trade secret regime compliant with international standards.

Category of Measure Description Examples of Tools/Documents
Organizational Internal regulations, training, NDA Trade Secret Policy, instructions, training, NDA
Technical DLP, MDM, access control, digital marking DLP systems, MDM, digital marking
Compliance and Audit Internal audit, ISO, GDPR compliance Audit, ISO 27001, GDPR compliance procedures

Organizational Trade Secret Protection Measures

Implementing a trade secret policy in a company starts with a clear classification of confidential information and the development of internal regulations.

At COREDO, we recommend:

  • Creating a list of information constituting a trade secret.
  • Implementing internal access control and access management system.
  • Training employees to work with trade secrets, including regular information security and insider risk training.
  • Concluding NDAs with staff, contractors, and external consultants.

Example: For a client in the fintech sector, the COREDO team developed a comprehensive corporate security policy, including whistleblowing procedures, Due Diligence in M&A and internal regulations for data storage and destruction.

DLP Systems, MDM, and Digital Marking

Technical measures for trade secret protection include implementing DLP systems (Data Loss Prevention), mobile device management (MDM), digital document marking, and electronic document management.

These tools not only limit access to information but also monitor unauthorized copying or transfer attempts.

In one of COREDO’s cases for a large holding structure in the EU, we integrated a DLP system with data storage and destruction policy, which reduced information leak risks during remote work and IT function outsourcing.

AML and Trade Secret Protection

Modern AML (Anti-Money Laundering) requirements are closely linked with trade secret regimes. Integrating compliance procedures and trade secret protection minimizes risks of regulatory fines and increases trust from banks and partners.

The solution developed at COREDO for an international payment company included an information security audit, implementation of ISO 27001, regular GDPR checks, and training of compliance officers on trade secret management.

Trade Secret Protection Abroad

Cross-border operations and outsourcing increase data leak risks and require special attention to legal aspects of trade secret transfer, protection in holding structures, and interactions with contractors.
COREDO’s practice showed that risk minimization is achieved through:

  • Implementing a multi-level access control system.
  • Using international standards (ISO 27001, GDPR).
  • Concluding detailed non-disclosure agreements and contractor liability agreements.

Information Leaks: Risks and Liability

Illustration for the section 'Information Leaks: Risks and Liability' in the article 'Trade Secrets – What They Are and How Protection is Ensured'
Even the most advanced system does not guarantee absolute protection from information leaks. Thus, incident management and clearly defining liability for trade secret disclosure become key elements of trade secret management.

Sources of Data Breaches and Scenarios

Most incidents are associated with insider threats (dishonest employees, contractors), industrial espionage, and errors in trade secret regime organization.

In international practice, cases of leaks through outsourcing, cloud services, and remote work are also common.

What to Do in Case of a Trade Secret Leak

The COREDO team recommends the following step-by-step plan:

  1. Immediately localize the incident (limit access, isolate systems).
  2. Conduct an information security audit and forensic investigation into the trade secret leak.
  3. Notify interested parties (internal whistleblowing, partners, regulators).
  4. Assess damage and initiate legal proceedings (including filing lawsuits).
  5. Review and enhance trade secret protection measures.

Liability for Trade Secret Disclosure

Liability for trade secret disclosure in the EU, Asia, and CIS includes civil, administrative, and criminal measures. In cross-border operations, proving the leak and forensic investigation, as well as interjurisdictions cooperation, become particularly important.

In COREDO’s practice, we encountered cases where successful compensation recovery was possible only with clear NDAs, digital document marking, and transparent incident management.

Trade Secret Protection System Audit

Illustration for the section 'Trade Secret Protection System Audit' in the article 'Trade Secrets – What They Are and How Protection is Ensured'
Regular audits of the trade secret protection system are a necessary condition for maintaining its effectiveness and international standard compliance. Such audits reveal vulnerabilities, assess ROI from implemented measures, and prepare the company for regulator inspections.

Business Process Audit Checklist

  • Classify confidential information.
  • Check the presence and relevance of internal regulations.
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of the access management system.
  • Verify employee training and their awareness of the trade secret policy.
  • Analyze technical protection means (DLP, MDM, digital marking).
  • Evaluate the company’s readiness to respond to incidents.

ROI Evaluation of Trade Secret Regime

Evaluating the cost of trade secrets and ROI of protection measures involves analyzing the probability and consequences of leaks, reducing risks of regulatory fines, saving on legal expenses, and building partner trust.

COREDO’s experience shows companies that regularly invest in audits and training achieve better market capitalization and stability.

Cases and Legal Practice on Trade Secrets

Illustration for the section 'Cases and Legal Practice on Trade Secrets' in the article 'Trade Secrets – What They Are and How Protection is Ensured'
Let’s look at common mistakes and gaps in protection systems and a review of court cases in the EU and Asia.

Common Mistakes in Protection Systems

  • Lack of clear information classification and internal regulations.
  • Insufficient employee training.
  • Ignoring technical protection measures in remote work and outsourcing.
  • A formal approach to concluding NDAs without subsequent execution control.

Court Cases in the EU and Asia

In 2023, a court in Germany recognized industrial espionage only due to digital document marking and DLP system logs. In Singapore, successful damage recovery became possible after integrating compliance and AML procedures into a corporate security policy.

COREDO’s practice confirms: having a transparent trade secret management system, digital evidence, and clearly drafted contractual obligations is a key success factor in legal disputes.

Practical Recommendations for Businesses

Illustration for the section 'Practical Recommendations for Businesses' in the article 'Trade Secrets – What They Are and How Protection is Ensured'
Effective trade secret protection: is an ongoing process, requiring a strategic approach and regular improvement.

Trade Secret Protection Checklist

  • Classify confidential information.
  • Implement internal regulations and trade secret policy.
  • Ensure employee training and regular workshops.
  • Conclude NDAs and agreements with contractors.
  • Use DLP, MDM, and other technical means.
  • Conduct regular audits and efficiency evaluations.
  • Integrate AML and compliance requirements.
  • Develop an incident response algorithm.
Implementing these steps will not only reduce information leak risks but also increase the company’s investment attractiveness, ensure international standards compliance, and strengthen partner trust.

If you are interested in establishing a sustainable trade secret protection system, the COREDO team is ready to share their experience, conduct an audit, and offer solutions proven in practice in the EU, Asia, and CIS.

[^1]: IBM Security, Cost of a Data Breach Report 2024
[^2]: European Union Intellectual Property Office, “Trade Secrets and Confidential Business Information: The Evidence from the EU,” 2023
[^3]: JETRO, “Intellectual Property Protection in Asia,” 2024
[^4]: Directive (EU) 2016/943 of the European Parliament and of the Council
[^5]: GDPR (General Data Protection Regulation)
[^6]: ISO/IEC 27001:2022
[^7]: Singapore Trade Secrets Law (Case Law Overview)
[^8]: Estonian Information Security Standard (E-ITS)

Did you know that in 2024, more than 60% of identified money laundering cases in Europe were linked to insufficient financial control and weakly integrated AML procedures in accounting? In the Czech Republic, according to FAU, the number of suspicious transactions identified thanks to new AML control technologies has increased by 38% over the past two years.

These are not just numbers; each one represents the risk of account blocking, fines up to 5 million CZK, and, more importantly, loss of trust from banks and partners.

Today, accounting in the Czech Republic is not only about bookkeeping and reporting but is a key front in the fight against money laundering and terrorist financing. The new AML 2025 requirements tighten the rules of the game: now the responsibility for non-compliance with Czech anti-money laundering legislation lies not only on the owners but also on accountants, compliance officers, and AML contact persons.

How to build a financial control system to minimize risks and ensure long-term business sustainability? What steps will help not only pass the AML audit but turn compliance into a strategic advantage?
In this article, I will share a structured practical guide on AML for accountants in the Czech Republic, based on real cases from COREDO, analysis of the latest legislative changes, and international standards. If you are an owner, manager, or financial director working in the EU, Asia, or CIS, I recommend reading to the end: you’ll get not only answers to key questions but also tools for effective AML risk management.

Anti-Money Laundering Law of the Czech Republic 2025

Illustration for the section 'Anti-Money Laundering Law of the Czech Republic 2025' in the article 'AML for Accountants in the Czech Republic – Key Aspects'

The Anti-Money Laundering Law of the Czech Republic 2025 sets new, stricter requirements for financial and non-financial organizations, as well as for professionals such as accountants and consultants. These rules aim to align Czech legislation with European directives and international standards on anti-money laundering and terrorist financing. Below are the key AML requirements in the Czech Republic to consider from 2025 onwards.

AML Requirements in the Czech Republic

The Czech Republic’s anti-money laundering legislation is built on Act No. 253/2008 Coll., which is harmonized with the European AML Directive (AMLD) and includes requirements for KYC, Due Diligence, internal policies, and financial monitoring. The law applies to a wide range of AML-obliged entities: banks, financial companies, accounting firms, auditors, legal companies, and even individual entrepreneurs if they provide accounting services Czech Republic or participate in the management of corporate structures.

From 2025, the new AML 2025 Czech Republic requirements have come into force: now each company subject to the law must appoint an AML contact person and register them with the Financial Analytical Office (FAU). This person is responsible for implementing and controlling AML compliance in the Czech Republic, interacting with regulators, and promptly submitting reports on suspicious transactions (STR).

In practice, COREDO’s team has successfully implemented projects for registering AML contact persons in the Czech Republic for international companies, ensuring their compliance with new standards.

Accountant Responsibilities for AML in the Czech Republic

Accounting in the Czech Republic today is not just accounting but a full-fledged element of the AML control system. Accountant’s AML responsibilities include:

  • Identifying and verifying clients (KYC), including Beneficial Owners.
  • Monitoring transactions and detecting suspicious activities.
  • Documenting and storing AML documentation for accountants, including protocols for Due Diligence and internal reports.
  • Maintaining accounting and AML: integrating procedures into daily business processes, automating controls, and regularly updating internal AML policies.
  • Preparing and submitting STR to FAU upon detecting suspicious activities.
The responsibility of accountants for non-compliance with AML includes administrative fines, criminal liability, and reputational risks for the company and its management.
COREDO’s practice confirms that implementing an internal control system and regular internal AML audits minimizes these risks and enhances business resilience.

AML in Accounting in the Czech Republic: What Is It and Why?

Illustration for the section 'AML in Accounting in the Czech Republic: What Is It and Why?' in the article 'AML for Accountants in the Czech Republic – Key Aspects'

AML in accounting in the Czech Republic: what is it and why, a question that has become especially relevant in 2025 for all who conduct business in the country. New AML control requirements now directly affect not only banks but also accountants, and it is no longer possible to do without implementing these procedures. Below we examine which AML procedures are now mandatory and why their implementation becomes an integral part of an accountant’s work in the Czech Republic.

AML Procedures in Accounting

Effective implementation of AML procedures for businesses begins with a risk-based approach (Risk-Based Approach). The algorithm recommended by the COREDO team to clients includes:

  1. Risk analysis: determining vulnerabilities, assessing clients, operations, and channels based on AML risk criteria for companies in the Czech Republic.
  2. Development of internal AML policies: formalizing KYC procedures, Due Diligence, monitoring, storage, and data processing.
  3. Implementation of internal AML control systems in accounting: automating AML processes using electronic accounting systems and specialized IT solutions.
  4. Documenting AML procedures: maintaining electronic and paper registers, storing protocols and reports according to legal requirements.
  5. Regular AML training for accountants in the Czech Republic: professional development, staff testing, implementation of best practices.
A project implemented by COREDO for automating AML control in an international holding structure reduced KYC verification time by 40% and improved the quality of financial monitoring.

Registration of AML Contact Person

From 2025, every company providing accounting services in the Czech Republic must appoint an AML contact person in the Czech Republic. The candidate must have sufficient qualifications in AML compliance, know Act No. 253/2008 Coll., and have experience interacting with the FAU.

The registration process is as follows:

  • The company director submits an application to the FAU with the appointed person’s data.
  • The contact person undergoes internal training and assumes responsibility for interacting with regulators, controlling procedures, and submitting STR.
The solution developed at COREDO for clients from the EU and Asia includes document templates, registration instructions, and support at every stage, significantly reducing the risk of errors and fines.

AML Audit: How to Prepare and Pass

Types of AML audits in the Czech Republic include internal AML audits, external audits (initiated by the owner or auditor), and state checks by the FAU. Preparing for an AML audit requires:

  • Updating and verifying all AML documents.
  • Testing staff knowledge of procedures.
  • Analyzing previous incidents and correcting identified violations.
Typical errors identified by COREDO’s team during client preparation for an audit: incomplete documentation of KYC, lack of regular updates to sanction lists, weak automation of reporting.
COREDO’s practice shows that implementing checklists and regular internal audits can help successfully pass even the strictest inspections.

AML Risks for Business in the Czech Republic

Illustration for the section 'AML Risks for Business in the Czech Republic' in the article 'AML for Accountants in the Czech Republic – Key Aspects'

AML risks for business in the Czech Republic are not only a formal legal requirement but also a real factor affecting the stability and security of financial operations. Compliance with standards on combating money laundering and terrorist financing becomes a key element for any company and its accounting.

AML Risks for Business and Accounting

AML for small and medium businesses in the Czech Republic is especially relevant as these companies often underestimate risks related to terrorist financing, sanction lists, and cross-border operations. A risk-based approach allows focusing on the most vulnerable areas: complex corporate structures, operations with foreign partners, anonymous payments.

The COREDO team has implemented projects on integrating automated monitoring systems, which allowed for the timely detection of suspicious transactions and minimized the risk of account blocking.
Thus, the proper implementation of AML practices becomes not only a tool for preventing financial crimes but also a way to avoid significant fines and legal liabilities, which we will discuss in more detail below.

AML: Responsibility and Fines in the Czech Republic

Liability for AML violations in the Czech Republic is multi-level:

  • Administrative: fines up to 5 million CZK for lack of an AML contact person, failure to submit STR, or insufficient internal control.
  • Criminal: liability for participation in money laundering schemes or terrorist financing.
  • Reputational: account blocking, license revocation, loss of trust from banks and partners.
In one of COREDO’s cases for a large European company, timely identification and correction of violations allowed avoiding a fine and maintaining access to banking services.

AML Recommendations for Accountants in the Czech Republic

Illustration for the section 'AML Recommendations for Accountants in the Czech Republic' in the article 'AML for Accountants in the Czech Republic – Key Aspects'

AML recommendations for accountants in the Czech Republic are becoming increasingly important in the context of tightening legislation and expanding anti-money laundering responsibilities. To effectively comply with new requirements, accountants must master basic tools for AML control implementation and understand which actions are necessary to minimize the risk of law violations.

Tools for Implementing AML Control

Integrating AML control into digital accounting systems is key to efficiency.

Using electronic registers, automating AML processes with AI and cloud solutions allows not only quicker KYC and Due Diligence but also reduces human error.

Metrics and KPIs for evaluating AML procedure efficiency include:

  • Time taken for KYC processing.
  • Number of suspicious transactions identified.
  • Percentage of successfully passed AML audits.
Introducing new AML technologies, according to COREDO experience, enables companies to adapt more quickly to changing requirements and minimize compliance costs.

AML Training for Accountants

AML training for accountants in the Czech Republic: not a formality but a necessary condition for maintaining compliance. Training programs include:

  • Study of AML 2025 changes.
  • Practical cases and situation modeling.
  • Knowledge testing and regular certification.
COREDO offers clients comprehensive training modules adapted to business specifics, significantly enhancing staff competency levels.

AML: Interaction with Banks and Regulators

Effective interaction of accounting with state AML bodies is the key to successfully passing inspections. Important aspects include:

  • Timely submission of reports on suspicious transactions.
  • Compliance with personal data protection requirements under AML.
  • Prompt response to FAU and bank requests.
COREDO Case: for an international company, a process of electronic document exchange with the FAU was established, reducing request processing time by 30% and increasing transparency in interactions.

AML Regulation in the Czech Republic and EU: Comparison

Illustration for the section 'AML Regulation in the Czech Republic and EU: Comparison' in the article 'AML for Accountants in the Czech Republic – Key Aspects'

AML Regulation in the Czech Republic and EU: comparison is an important topic for companies working with financial operations and digital assets. In recent years, the Czech Republic has been actively integrating European standards in the field of anti-money laundering (AML), leading to both convergence and the retention of certain national regulatory features. We will now explore in detail the key differences in AML requirements in the Czech Republic and the entire EU.

AML Requirements in the Czech Republic and EU: What’s the Difference?

Although AML regulation in the Czech Republic is based on European directives, there are some national features:

For foreign companies and entrepreneurs, it is important to consider differences in approaches to KYC, Due Diligence, and internal auditing.
COREDO’s experience shows: adapting internal policies to Czech standards helps avoid misunderstandings with regulators and banks.

Conclusions and Steps for Business

The year 2025 has brought significant changes to AML compliance in the Czech Republic: tightening control, new accounting duties, and increased management responsibility. To ensure compliance and minimize risks, I recommend:

  • Conduct an audit of current procedures and update internal AML policies.
  • Appoint and register an AML contact person by February 1, 2025.
  • Implement automated monitoring and reporting systems.
  • Regularly train staff and conduct internal audits.
  • Ensure transparency of corporate structure and timely disclose information on beneficial owners.
  • If complexities arise, seek legal assistance for AML processes from experts with international experience.

AML for Accountants in the Czech Republic: Questions and Answers

How to appoint an AML contact person?

The company director selects a qualified employee, submits their data to the FAU, organizes training, and formalizes internal documents.

What documents are needed for AML control?

KYC questionnaires, Due Diligence reports, internal AML policies, audit protocols, reports on suspicious activities.

How to prepare for an AML audit?

Conduct an internal review, update documentation, train staff, rectify previously identified violations.

How to automate AML processes?

Implement electronic accounting systems, use AI solutions for transaction monitoring, automate KYC and reporting.

What sanctions are there for AML violations?

Fines up to 5 million CZK, account blocking, license revocation, criminal liability.
If you need more information, see the resource collection and templates below.

Useful Resources and Templates for Work

AML Duty Responsible Party Execution Deadline Document/Report Responsibility for Violation
Appointing a Contact Person Director By 02/01/2025 Registration with FAU Fine up to 5 million CZK
Conducting KYC/Due Diligence Accounting Upon client acceptance KYC questionnaire, reports Fine, account blocking
Internal AML Audit Compliance Officer Annually Internal audit act Administrative responsibility
Staff Training Director Once a year Training protocol Fine, license revocation

Useful links:

If you have any questions regarding the implementation of AML procedures in accounting in the Czech Republic, the COREDO team is ready to share their experience, adapt solutions to your business’s specifics, and provide reliable support at every stage.

Every third major fine in Europe over the past three years is related to insufficient scrutiny of Politically Exposed Persons (PEP) and violation of AML procedures. According to FATF, more than 60% of international corruption cases somehow involve PEPs and their surroundings.

What should businesses do if a politically exposed person is among their clients or partners? How can they avoid investigations while maintaining business reputation and access to financial institutions in the EU, Asia, or Africa?
With the growth of cross-border deals and tightening financial regulations, proper PEP identification and compliance are not just formalities but keys to business sustainability.

In this article, I, Nikita Veremeev, will explain why dealing with PEPs is a high-risk area, the legal requirements applicable in different regions, how the COREDO team implements practical solutions for clients, and what to do to stay within the law.
I recommend reading to the end: you will receive not only strategic ideas but also specific algorithms that will help protect and scale your business internationally.

Who are PEPs and why businesses need to check them

Illustration for the section 'Who are PEPs and why businesses need to check them' in the article 'Politically Exposed Person – how to interact without breaking the law'
Who are PEPs and why businesses need to check them is a question not only of financial risks but also of compliance with international compliance standards. Politically linked individuals can pose reputational and legal threats to companies, so it is important to understand their status and the reasons for conducting checks.

What is a PEP and international standards

A Politically Exposed Person (PEP) is an individual who is or has been in a high-level public or political position, as well as their family members and close business partners. PEP classification includes national, foreign, and international PEPs. Nationals are, for example, ministers or deputies in their country; foreigners: similar positions in other states; internationals: individuals working in international organizations (e.g., UN, IMF).

FATF (Financial Action Task Force) defines PEPs as key subjects in the fight against money laundering (AML) and terrorist financing. The European Union and OFAC (Office of Foreign Assets Control, USA) have their own, though similar, criteria for identifying PEPs, including mandatory scanning against national and international PEP lists, and applying the principle of political exposure in client risk assessment.
In COREDO’s practice, we encounter situations where the PEP status is not evident: for example, when registering a company in Singapore or Estonia, where the beneficiary is a family member of a former minister.

In such cases, not only formal identification is important but also thorough Due Diligence based on international AML standards and FATF recommendations.

Risks of doing business with PEP for foreign companies

Engaging with politically exposed persons carries several risk levels for businesses.

First, corruption risks: PEPs are more likely to be involved in money laundering schemes, abuse of power, and illicit enrichment. Second, reputational risks: collaborating with PEPs without proper checks could result in blocked accounts, service refusals from banks, and even being listed in sanction lists.

Legal responsibility for companies for AML violations when dealing with PEPs in the EU and Asia involves not only fines (up to 10% of annual turnover) but also criminal prosecution of executives. For example, in 2023, a European bank was fined €83 million for inadequate operation controls involving PEPs from African countries, which led to a large-scale investigation and loss of licenses for certain activities.
COREDO’s experience confirms: even in the absence of malicious intent, a formal approach to checking PEPs leads to financial and reputational losses.

Therefore, risk management when dealing with PEPs: is a key element of corporate safety and transparency.

PEP compliance: requirements in the EU, Asia, Africa

Illustration for the section 'PEP compliance: requirements in the EU, Asia, Africa' in the article 'Politically Exposed Person – how to interact without breaking the law'
PEP compliance: is a key regulatory element for banks and companies dealing with international clients and counterparties, as it allows identifying and controlling risks related to politically exposed persons. PEP compliance requirements vary significantly in the EU, Asia, and Africa, with each jurisdiction setting its own standards and verification procedures. Let’s examine how regional approaches to PEP compliance are formed and differ.

Regional requirements and differences

The European Union has strict and unified PEP identification and control standards enshrined in the AML Directives (5AMLD, 6AMLD). Companies are required to conduct enhanced due diligence, regularly update information about clients and their beneficiaries, and document all control actions related to PEP transactions.
In Asia, approaches vary: in Singapore and Hong Kong, regulators require mandatory KYC procedures for PEPs and automated transaction monitoring systems. UAE emphasizes sanctions compliance and mandatory checks for all related parties.
In Africa, requirements are gradually tightening: leading countries (South Africa, Nigeria) are adopting FATF recommendations, but the level of automation and transparency is still lower, and liability for violations is more lenient.
For clarity – see the comparative table:

Region Main Regulators PEP Identification Requirements Liability for Violations Features
EU EU, FATF Strict, unified standards High fines Unified lists, transparency
Asia Singapore, Hong Kong Variable, by country Depends on jurisdiction Local features
Africa National authorities Limited, evolving Can be milder Differences by country

Liability for AML violations in dealing with PEPs

Violating AML and PEP compliance requirements entails serious legal consequences.

Companies and their executives are liable for non-compliance with due diligence procedures, insufficient transaction control, and failure to identify PEPs among clients or partners.
Sanctions include heavy fines, business prohibitions, license revocations, and even criminal prosecution. In 2024, a major investment fund in the UK was fined £47 million for the lack of an automated PEP identification system, which led to missing suspicious transactions involving foreign politicians.
COREDO’s practice shows: implementing best practices for AML and regular PEP risk audits not only helps avoid fines but also raises trust from banks and international partners.

Thus, timely detection of PEPs and regular enhancement of compliance procedures are keys to sustainable operation in the financial market; next, we will consider how client checks for PEP and KYC are conducted in practice.

How to check a client for PEP and KYC?

Illustration for the section 'How to check a client for PEP and KYC?' in the article 'Politically Exposed Person – how to interact without breaking the law'
The process of checking a client’s compliance with PEP and KYC requirements: is not a formality but a crucial stage in assessing risks when dealing with individuals and legal entities.

Proper identification, verification, and analysis of PEP status determine not only business safety but also compliance with legislation and international standards.

Let us delve into organizing due diligence and KYC for clients with PEP indications.

Due diligence and KYC for PEP individuals

Identifying a PEP starts with constructing a client’s risk profile and checking them against national and international PEP lists (e.g., World-Check, Dow Jones, Refinitiv).
An effective due diligence procedure for politically exposed persons includes several stages:

  1. Initial identification – analyzing profile data, public sources, and corporate registers.
  2. Checking beneficial owners and associated persons (family, business partners), as family and associated PEP individuals are often used to circumvent sanctions and conceal true control.
  3. Disclosure of information about the PEP and documenting all verification stages – a mandatory requirement for companies in the EU and Asia.

COREDO’s team frequently encounters cases where a formal check doesn’t reveal PEP status, but a thorough audit of the corporate structure and analysis of connections uncovers hidden beneficiaries with political exposure. This approach minimizes risks and ensures corporate transparency.

Automation of PEP identification and monitoring

Modern digital tools for PEP identification (such as API integrations with global databases, AI algorithms for analyzing corporate connections) allow businesses to automate KYC processes and transactional monitoring.
Automating PEP identification reduces the risk of human error, speeds up data processing, and ensures regular monitoring of PEP operations in real-time.

A solution developed at COREDO for a client in the Czech Republic allowed the integration of an automated compliance system with internal banking processes, reducing the time for verifying new clients with PEP status from 3 days to 2 hours.

Investments in digital tools for PEP monitoring pay off by reducing operational and reputational risks and enhancing the efficiency of internal controls.

Risks and control when working with PEP

Illustration for the section 'Risks and control when working with PEP' in the article 'Politically Exposed Person – how to interact without breaking the law'
Risks and controls when working with PEP require special attention: such clients are exposed to increased risks of corruption, money laundering, and other financial crimes. Effective control mechanisms and the implementation of procedures, including conducting AML audits and regular operation monitoring, are crucial for minimizing these risks.

AML audit and implementation for companies

Developing and implementing effective AML policies for companies with an international structure is a task that requires a comprehensive approach.
COREDO’s practice confirms: a successful project starts with a detailed PEP risk audit, corporate transparency assessment, and building an internal control system.

Key elements include:
  • Regular updating of KYC and due diligence procedures for PEP
  • Implementing automated control and reporting systems
  • Conducting internal audits of AML procedure effectiveness and adjusting policies based on identified weaknesses

For holdings and company groups in the EU and Asia, integrating international FATF standards, and local requirements, and training staff on AML and PEP compliance is crucial.

Moving on to the next stage – analyzing methods for risk minimization and violation prevention – allows ensuring comprehensive compliance with regulator requirements and stability of the compliance system.

How to minimize risks and avoid violations

Consider this case: when registering a company in Singapore, one of the beneficiaries was linked to a former high-ranking official from a CIS country.
The COREDO team implemented a comprehensive check not only on the beneficiary but also all family and associated persons, identified potential conflicts of interest, and ensured disclosure of information for banks and regulators. As a result, the client successfully passed the compliance check at a Singaporean bank, gaining access to financial services without delays.
Another example: in Estonia, a client faced account blockages due to insufficient control over transactions involving PEP. After implementing automated transaction monitoring and performing regular risk audits, the business regained access to banking services and avoided fines.

These cases highlight: best practices in AML and corporate ethics are the foundation for minimizing legal and reputational risks when dealing with politically exposed persons.

How to work with PEP without breaking the law

Illustration for the section 'How to work with PEP without breaking the law' in the article 'Politically Exposed Person – how to interact without breaking the law'

Working with PEPs requires special caution: the legislation imposes strict requirements and additional checks for dealings with politically significant individuals. To comply with the law and avoid associated risks, it is important to establish a clear and consistent PEP strategy at every stage of the business.

Step-by-step plan for businesses

If a PEP is identified among your clients or partners, follow a clear algorithm:

  1. Conduct enhanced identification and due diligence, including checking all related persons and beneficiaries.
  2. Integrate international FATF standards and EU requirements into corporate KYC procedures, automate operation monitoring.
  3. Ensure staff training on AML and PEP compliance issues, implement escalation procedures for suspicious operations.
  4. Document all stages of verification and interaction with PEP to be ready for regulator inspections.

COREDO’s experience shows that timely implementation of best practices for AML and legal support in transactions involving PEPs is the key to business sustainability on international markets.

Reporting and interaction with regulators

Companies are required to maintain detailed reporting on all operations involving PEPs, including disclosure of information on beneficiaries, family, and associated persons.
Interaction with regulators during inspections requires transparency of the corporate structure and readiness to provide all necessary documentation upon request.

In case of sanctions checks or suspicious operations, it is important to have a well-established system of internal control and financial monitoring.

The COREDO team supports clients at all stages, from report preparation to interaction with international regulators and sanction checks.

Frequently asked questions on business compliance

How to determine if a client or partner is a PEP?

Use international and national PEP lists, analyze public sources and corporate registers, conduct thorough due diligence of all beneficiaries and associated persons.

What sanctions await for violations of AML procedures?

In the EU, fines up to 10% of turnover, in Asia: business prohibitions and license revocations, in Africa – restrictions on access to financial services.

How to automate PEP checks?

Implement digital tools for PEP identification and monitoring, integrate them with corporate KYC and AML systems.

How to account for family and associated persons?

Check not only direct beneficiaries but everyone who may be linked to a PEP through family or business ties and document the results of the verification.

How to ensure corporate structure transparency?

Disclose information about ultimate beneficiaries, implement internal control and regular audits of corporate connections.

Practical steps for businesses

  • Dealing with politically significant persons requires a systematic approach based on international AML standards and best compliance practices with PEP.
  • Effective identification, monitoring automation, and regular risk audits are the basis of legal safety and business stability.
  • Implementing comprehensive AML policies, training staff, and ensuring corporate structure transparency can minimize reputational and financial risks.
  • If you plan to register a company, obtain a financial license, or scale your business involving PEPs: the COREDO team is ready to offer strategic solutions based on international experience and deep expertise.

For consultations and legal support, contact us directly, as COREDO’s experience guarantees reliability and transparency at every stage of your international business.

In 2024, the Czech real estate market hit a record: according to the European Banking Authority, over 16% of major real estate transactions in the EU were identified as high-risk in terms of money laundering – and Czech Republic ranked in the top 5 countries for suspicious operations in the sector.

This is not just statistics, it is a signal for everyone involved in real estate services in the Czech Republic: the risks of tighter controls and sanctions have already become a reality. Why do even honest agencies face account blockages, regulatory audits, and reputational losses? How have AML requirements in Czech Republic changed for realtors in 2024–2025, and what should be done to avoid being among the violators?

Today, the real estate market in Czech Republic is not just about investments and transactions, but also an area of increased attention from regulators. The Czech law on anti-money laundering (Act No. 253/2008 Sb.), EU AML directives, new FAÚ requirements, all form a new reality for realtors, agencies, and investors.

If you want to not just survive but scale your business, ensure transparency, and earn partners’ trust, this article is your practical guide.

I will share how the COREDO team has implemented dozens of successful projects on AML system implementation, registration of contact persons, and FAÚ audit preparation, and what solutions work effectively in 2025.

AML Requirements in Czech Republic 2024–2025

Illustration to the section “AML Requirements in Czech Republic 2024–2025” in the article “Real Estate in Czech Republic – AML Requirements for Realtors”

AML requirements in Czech Republic 2024–2025 are significantly tightening and covering more companies and entrepreneurs operating in the country. The introduction of new rules and updates to local legislation are closely aligned with international AML standards, which requires careful study of the key law 253/2008 Sb. and compliance with new regulations in the coming years.

Act 253/2008 Sb. and International AML Standards

The Czech anti-money laundering law (No. 253/2008 Sb.) is the foundation defining how realtors and real estate agencies should act.

The law integrates EU AML directives (including the 6th Directive) and FATF standards, ensuring compliance with international requirements and allowing Czech Republic to remain an attractive jurisdiction for foreign investors.

In COREDO’s practice, we regularly face the need to consider requirements for client identification, source of funds analysis, and monitoring transactions with FATF high-risk jurisdictions.

In 2024–2025, key changes affected the expansion of the list of obligated entities, tightening controls over commercial real estate transactions, and introducing new criteria for assessing beneficial owners. Realtors are now obliged to conduct comprehensive client checks and ensure constant financial monitoring in Czech Republic at all stages of the transaction.

Moreover, from February 1, 2025, all AML-obligated entities must appoint and register a contact person with the FAÚ, which has become a mandatory step for realtors and real estate agencies.

Registration of AML Contact Person for Realtors

From 2024, changes came into effect requiring every real estate agency to appoint and register an AML contact person.

The electronic registration of an AML contact person is done through the datová schránka system using the Czech Ministry of Finance form.

The solution developed by COREDO for our clients allows for the automation of data submission and updates, minimizing the risk of missing AML contact person notification deadlines in Czech Republic.

AML obligations extended for realtors in Czech Republic: they now include not only client identification but also regular data updates, internal control implementation, and mandatory reporting of suspicious operations. COREDO’s practice confirms: only a systematic compliance approach can avoid fines and reputational losses.

The Role of FAÚ and National Financial Regulators

The Financial Analytical Office of Czech Republic (FAÚ) is the key body responsible for financial monitoring and AML compliance enforcement. FAÚ works closely with the Czech National Bank, conducts regulatory audits, and analyzes suspicious operations.

Our experience at COREDO has shown that FAÚ audit preparation requires not only compliance with internal AML procedures but also the ability to quickly provide documents proving transaction transparency and source of funds.

Realtors’ AML Obligations in Czech Republic

Illustration to the section “Realtors' AML Obligations in Czech Republic” in the article “Real Estate in Czech Republic – AML Requirements for Realtors”

Realtors’ AML obligations in Czech Republic include mandatory control to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing, requiring thorough client checks and risk assessments.

Special attention is paid to KYC procedures since they help identify beneficiaries, establish the origin of funds, and meet the tightening legal requirements.

KYC: How to Check a Client and Assess Risks

KYC (Know Your Customer) – is not just a formality but the foundation of a real estate agency’s internal policy. Comprehensive client check by a realtor in Czech Republic includes identity verification, source of funds analysis, politically exposed person (PEP) status check, and risk assessment related to FATF high-risk jurisdictions.

The COREDO team implements automated solutions for clients, enabling the integration of KYC procedures with internal CRM systems to minimize the human factor.

Special attention is devoted to transactions with foreign investors: here, it is important not only to verify documents but also to assess ownership structure, identify the ultimate beneficial owner, and ensure absence of ties to sanction lists.

Beneficiary Check: How to Identify the Owner

In 2025, criteria for determining the beneficial owner in Czech Republic have tightened: realtors are now required to document ownership chain, including offshore structures and trusts.

COREDO’s practice showed that ignoring this requirement leads to transaction blocking and additional checks by FAÚ.

To minimize risks, we recommend using international databases and conducting independent verification of ownership information.

Internal Control and AML Automation

Implementing internal AML control for realtors in Czech Republic involves not just developing regulations, but also integrating automated AML systems to ensure information security and compliance with international standards.

Solutions implemented by COREDO allow real estate agencies to reduce operational costs, improve control quality over suspicious operations, quickly respond to legislative changes, and regulatory requirements.

Registration of AML Contact Person in Czech Republic

Illustration to the section “Registration of AML Contact Person in Czech Republic” in the article “Real Estate in Czech Republic – AML Requirements for Realtors”

Registration of the AML contact person in Czech Republic is a mandatory procedure for companies subject to local anti-money laundering laws.

Below, we will detail how registration through datová schránka is carried out and what steps are necessary.

Registration through datová schránka: Step by Step

Electronic registration of the AML contact person is a mandatory step for all real estate agencies. The procedure includes:

  1. Filling out the Czech Ministry of Finance form on the official portal.
  2. Submitting the application through the electronic datová schránka system.
  3. Receiving confirmation of the AML contact person’s registration.

Deadlines for AML contact person notification in Czech Republic are strictly regulated: no later than 10 working days after appointment. The solution developed by COREDO automates this process and allows tracking notification status in real-time.

Change of Contact Person Details

In the event of changes to the AML contact person’s details in Czech Republic, updated information must be submitted via datová schránka within 5 working days. Cessation of AML entity activities also requires timely regulator notification.

Our experience has shown: automating data updates minimizes the risk of administrative liability.

Liability for Late Notification and Errors

Liability for late notification is one of the common reasons for fines. Sanctions for non-compliance with AML can amount to hundreds of thousands of euros, and repeated violations lead to agency operation suspension.

Typical errors include late data updates, absence of supporting documents, and a formal approach to form filling. COREDO’s practice confirms: only a clear system of internal control can avoid these risks.

Suspicious Real Estate Transactions in Czech Republic

Illustration to the section “Suspicious Real Estate Transactions in Czech Republic” in the article “Real Estate in Czech Republic – AML Requirements for Realtors”

Suspicious real estate transactions in Czech Republic are becoming an increasingly pressing issue amid rising fraudulent schemes and new ways to deceive buyers and tenants.

Understanding the signs of such transactions helps to recognize the risk in time and avoid unpleasant consequences.

Signs of Suspicious Operations and Their Examples

Suspicious real estate transactions in Czech Republic are operations that do not conform to regular practice, involve complex financing schemes, PEP participation, FATF high-risk jurisdictions, and unclear source of funds. For example, purchasing real estate for an amount significantly exceeding the client’s official income or using complex offshore structures for payment.

The COREDO team provides client training on suspicious operation analysis, enabling timely detection and prevention of income legalization attempts.

Report to FAÚ: Procedure and Timing

A report on suspicious real estate transactions is submitted to FAÚ before the transaction is completed. Important: delay in providing information can be considered a violation of AML requirements.

The form is completed electronically, and the report is stored within the agency’s internal control system. The solution implemented by COREDO allows integrating the notification process with internal procedures to ensure transparency for regulators.

Realtors’ Liability for AML in Czech Republic

Illustration to the section “Realtors' Liability for AML in Czech Republic” in the article “Real Estate in Czech Republic – AML Requirements for Realtors”

Realtors’ liability for AML in Czech Republic encompasses a complex set of legal and organizational obligations aimed at preventing money laundering and terrorist financing in real estate.

Violation of these requirements can lead to substantial fines and other sanctions, which we will discuss in more detail in the following sections.

Types of Fines and Sanctions

Sanctions for AML violations in real estate include administrative fines (up to 5 million CZK), suspension or revocation of licenses, and in certain cases: criminal responsibility.

Realtors’ liability for AML extends to all transaction participants, including the contact person and agency head.

In COREDO’s practice, there have been cases where delayed notification of a contact person’s change led to account blocking and operation suspension for up to 3 months.

FAÚ Audits: Common Realtor Mistakes

An FAÚ audit on AML is not just a document review but also an analysis of the internal control system’s effectiveness, KYC procedure quality, and timeliness of suspicious operation reports.

Common realtor mistakes include lack of internal regulations, formal KYC approach, and insufficient staff training.

COREDO’s practice shows: regular training and internal procedure audits: the key to reducing risks and successfully passing audits.

AML and Real Estate in Czech Republic: Business Impact

AML and real estate in Czech Republic: a crucial factor that directly impacts the operation of any business connected with real estate investments and transactions.

Modern anti-money laundering (AML) requirements affect both Czech and foreign companies and impose specific demands on investors and politically exposed persons (PEP).

Additionally, particular attention is paid to disclosing information about ultimate beneficiaries and the source of funds’ origin, which becomes particularly relevant for foreign investors and PEPs.

AML for Foreign Investors and PEP

AML features for transactions with foreign investors are associated with the need to consider PEP identification, source of funds analysis, and risk assessment related to FATF high-risk jurisdictions.

COREDO’s solutions help real estate agencies structure processes so that transactions with foreign investors undergo transparent KYC checks, increasing trust from international partners and banks.

Transparency and Trust in International Business

Financial transparency of transactions and compliance with international AML standards are key factors in attracting investments and scaling business. Compliance in real estate becomes a competitive advantage: banks and partners increasingly require adherence to internal and external standards.

The COREDO team implements solutions for clients to integrate AML procedures with information security and corporate governance policies.

AML for Realtors in Czech Republic: 2025 Requirements

In 2025, new AML requirements for realtors will come into force in Czech Republic: rules for combating money laundering and terrorist financing.

These changes make client control and financial operations an obligatory part of real estate agency operations, regardless of size.

Below are the key steps and a checklist to help agencies comply with updated AML requirements for realtors in Czech Republic in 2025.

Checklist for Real Estate Agencies

Stage Action Documents/Tools Deadline Responsible
1 Appoint and register an AML contact person Ministry of Finance form, datová schránka By March 10, 2025 Director
2 Implement internal AML procedures Internal regulations Constantly Compliance Officer
3 KYC client check KYC questionnaire, identification Before transaction Responsible Manager
4 Determine the beneficial owner Ownership structure documents Before transaction Compliance Officer
5 Report suspicious operations FAÚ form Immediately Compliance Officer
6 Update AML contact person data Application through datová schránka Within 5 days Director
7 Audit and train staff Protocols, training materials Annually Director

Automation and Cost Reduction

Integrating automated AML systems and syncing KYC with CRM allows real estate agencies to minimize operational costs, increase ROI from AML system implementation and ensure process transparency.

COREDO’s solutions include selecting technology and software for AML, staff training, and setting internal policies so that compliance requirements do not hinder business growth.

Recommendations for Entrepreneurs and Realtors

AML requirements in Czech Republic are not just a formality but a strategic factor for real estate business sustainability and growth.

A comprehensive approach to compliance, process automation, regular staff training, and transaction transparency are key elements that allow not only to avoid sanctions but also to enhance international partners’ trust, scale the business, and minimize reputational risks. COREDO’s practice confirms: only systematic solutions and professional support at all stages provide long-term success in the Czech real estate market.

“90% of major corporate scandals in recent years in Europe were related to the concealment of real beneficial owners and non-transparent ownership structures.” This statistic from the European Commission is not just impressive – it sets a new development vector for EU corporate law by 2025. Today, transparency of business owners and strict AML compliance for companies are becoming not just regulatory requirements, but a strategic imperative for any international business planning to register legal entities in Europe, Asia, or the CIS.

In recent months, the COREDO team has observed how the tightening of rules on beneficial ownership disclosure is changing not only the legal landscape but also approaches to risk management, investment attractiveness, and corporate strategy. The new requirements for beneficial owners in Europe, the automation of the EU’s UBO register by 2025, and the digitalization of compliance are challenges that require not only a deep understanding but also practical solutions.
Are you prepared for the fact that in 2025, control over the company and beneficial ownership will be under constant digital monitoring, and liability for concealing information about the ultimate beneficial owner will become one of the key business risks? If your answer is not definitive, I recommend reading this analytical guide to the end: here you will find not only strategic ideas but also practical recommendations tested by COREDO’s experience in the EU, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Cyprus, Estonia, the United Kingdom, Singapore, and Dubai.

Requirements for Beneficiaries in Europe in 2025

Illustration for the section 'Requirements for Beneficiaries in Europe in 2025' in the article 'New requirements for company beneficial owners in Europe in 2025'
In 2025, requirements for beneficiaries in Europe are tightening: companies are required to ensure ownership transparency, adhere to new AML standards, and regularly update information on ultimate owners. To comply with these rules, it is important to clearly understand who is recognized as the ultimate beneficiary and how to correctly identify them within European legislation.

How to Identify the Ultimate Beneficiary

From 2025, the concept of the ultimate beneficial owner (UBO) in EU corporate law undergoes significant changes. Now, a UBO is understood not only as a person owning more than a 25% share in the company but also anyone who exercises substantial control: even without formal ownership. At COREDO, we have encountered cases where, for example, veto rights on the board or the ability to appoint key managers were recognized by regulators as signs of control requiring disclosure in the EU’s UBO register 2025.

Special attention is paid to cross-border ownership structures and nominee services. If the ownership chain includes a foreign company or a nominee holder, disclosure of information about the beneficiary becomes mandatory, and the distinction between the beneficiary and the controlled foreign company becomes crucial for Due Diligence and KYC procedures. COREDO’s practice confirms: ignoring these nuances leads to account blocks and license denials, especially in financial services, crypto, and forex sectors.

EU UBO Register: Disclosure in 2025

We are entering the era of automated platforms for submitting data on beneficiaries. In 2025, the EU’s UBO register becomes fully digital, integrating with national registers and banking systems. This means that the annual confirmation and updating of beneficiary data is now conducted through an automated beneficiary register, and monitoring changes in ownership structure is conducted in real time.

At COREDO, we have developed solutions that allow integrating clients’ corporate systems with data submission platforms, significantly reducing processing times and minimizing the risk of errors. Nevertheless, the expansion of access to the UBO register (including for banks, auditors, and regulators) requires special attention to the storage and protection of beneficiary data: violations in this area can lead to corporate sanctions and legal prohibitions.

AML Compliance: New Requirements 2025

Illustration for the section 'AML Compliance: New Requirements 2025' in the article 'New requirements for company beneficial owners in Europe in 2025'
The requirements for AML compliance in 2025 are becoming stricter: companies must not only strengthen internal procedures but also be prepared for constant checks and the collection of additional data about clients and their transactions. In this context, updated AML directives and KYC procedures acquire special significance, where key changes appear that need to be known today.

AML Directives and KYC Procedures: What’s New

The EU’s Anti-Money Laundering Directive (EU AML Directive 2025) tightens AML compliance requirements for companies. Now, every stage of legal entity registration in Europe is accompanied by mandatory due diligence and KYC procedures, and the role of the compliance officer becomes key for corporate reporting.

A real case from COREDO’s practice: when obtaining a payment services license in Estonia, the client had not only to disclose the entire ownership chain but also confirm the absence of anonymous beneficiaries, provide documents confirming the source of funds, and implement automated transaction monitoring systems. This approach is becoming standard for all companies operating in the financial sector of the EU, UK, and Singapore.

Liability for Violation of UBO Register Requirements

In 2025, fines for violation of UBO register requirements reach 10% of the company’s annual turnover, and automatic removal from the company register becomes a real threat for those who do not update data timely. Liability for concealing a beneficiary now extends not only to directors but also to compliance officers, and court prohibitions for violating beneficiary disclosure can block account operations and asset transactions.

The solution implemented by COREDO for a client in Czechia minimized the risk of sanctions for non-compliance with AML directives: a comprehensive check of the ownership structure was conducted, an automatic notification system for data updates was implemented, and employee training on new corporate compliance standards was organized.

Implementation of New Requirements for Business

Illustration for the section 'Implementation of New Requirements for Business' in the article 'New requirements for company beneficial owners in Europe in 2025'
The implementation of new requirements for business in 2025 entails significant changes in legislation and operational regulations. To minimize risks and comply with established norms, companies need to timely familiarize themselves with new obligations and correctly implement all necessary procedures.

Detailed information on how to update beneficiary details in 2025 is provided in the next section.

How to Update Beneficiary Data in 2025

The transition to automated platforms demands a clear procedure for working with the UBO register. In practice, COREDO recommends the following algorithm:

  1. Conduct an audit of the company’s ownership structure, identifying all individuals with substantial control and ownership share.
  2. Prepare a package of documents for identifying the ultimate beneficiary: passport, proof of address, ownership documents, corporate resolutions.
  3. Enter or update data in the automated beneficiary register via the national platform or integrated corporate system.
  4. Annually confirm the accuracy of the information, track changes, and promptly respond to regulatory requirements.
Best practices in managing ownership structures show: integrating automated reminders and regularly auditing beneficiary data help avoid fines for untimely updates and automatic removal from the company register.

Thus, the transition to automated platforms for preparing and maintaining the UBO register creates a base for effective compliance process automation.

Automation of Compliance Processes

Digitalization of compliance is a key trend in 2025. COREDO’s team is implementing modern solutions for automating the submission and monitoring of beneficiary data: from integration with government platforms to using cloud services for information storage and protection. Special attention is paid to the security and confidentiality of beneficiary data, with encryption, multi-level authentication, and regular IT system audits becoming mandatory elements of corporate compliance.

In a case for a COREDO client in the UK, implementing a digital platform reduced compliance costs by 30% and accelerated the process of updating beneficiary data from 10 days to 48 hours, significantly improving the company’s corporate transparency rating.

New Requirements and the Investment Climate

Illustration for the section 'New Requirements and the Investment Climate' in the article 'New requirements for company beneficial owners in Europe in 2025'
In the context of emerging new requirements and a changing investment climate, companies have to consider increasingly complex regulation and business environment parameters. These changes affect not only business strategy but also directly impact corporate risks and tax consequences for investors and entrepreneurs.

As a result, a new set of challenges is emerging that requires increased attention to corporate risk management and tax planning.

Corporate Risks and Tax Consequences

Disclosure of beneficiary information directly impacts the investment climate. International banks and partners are increasingly requesting confirmation of business owner transparency when opening accounts and closing deals. COREDO observes that companies promptly implementing new corporate governance standards and ownership chain disclosure gain access to more favorable banking financing conditions and international investments.

On the other hand, the new requirements also present tax risks for beneficiaries, especially in cross-border structures. Special attention is paid to double taxation avoidance agreements and their impact on the beneficiary’s status. COREDO’s practice shows: timely auditing of the ownership structure and correct information disclosure minimize the risks of tax assessments and sanctions by regulators.

Benefits and Exemptions for Different Companies

There are categories of companies with special disclosure conditions, such as funds, trusts, and certain types of holding structures. Low-risk entities and specific sectors (e.g., innovative startups) are provided exemptions on the amount of disclosed information. However, the final decision always remains with the EU regulatory bodies and national regulators.

COREDO’s team recommends closely monitoring updates in corporate transparency ratings and consulting with specialized lawyers when choosing an ownership structure to not miss available benefits and avoid unnecessary risks.

Practical Recommendations for Business

Change/Requirement What Should Businesses Do? Timelines/Frequency Responsibility/Sanctions
Annual Confirmation of UBO Data Prepare documents, update data in the register Once a year Fines, automatic removal from the register
Implementation of Digital Submission Platforms Integrate corporate systems During implementation Corporate sanctions
Expansion of Substantial Control Criteria Conduct an audit of the ownership structure By 2025 Directors’ responsibility

How to Minimize Compliance Risks?

  • Conduct an audit of the ownership structure with the involvement of external experts.
  • Implement automated platforms for beneficiary data submission and monitoring.
  • Regularly train employees on new AML and EU corporate law requirements for 2025.
  • Use digital solutions for storing and protecting data, complying with international standards.
  • Maintain constant monitoring of changes in legislation and corporate sanctions lists.

Metrics for UBO and AML Procedure Effectiveness

  • Time to update beneficiary data (target: <48 hours).
  • Number of identified errors in the ownership structure (target: 0).
  • Percentage of successfully confirmed data in the automated register (target: 100%).
  • Number of sanction or fine cases (target: 0).

Compliance Officer’s Checklist

  • [ ] Conducted audit of the ownership structure, identifying all UBOs.
  • [ ] Updated data in the automated beneficiary register.
  • [ ] Implemented a digital compliance platform.
  • [ ] Employees trained on AML and UBO reporting.
  • [ ] Developed a plan for monitoring legislative changes.

Long-Tail Queries: Questions and Answers

Illustration for the section 'Long-Tail Queries: Questions and Answers' in the article 'New requirements for company beneficial owners in Europe in 2025'

What are the new requirements for beneficiary disclosure in the EU in 2025?

Expansion of UBO identification criteria, mandatory annual confirmation of data, automation of submission and monitoring of information, tightening of sanctions for violations.

How to update beneficial owner data in the automated register?

Via the national or integrated corporate platform, providing up-to-date documents and confirmation of the ownership structure.

What are the consequences for concealing beneficiary information in a European company?

Fines up to 10% of turnover, automatic removal from the register, court prohibitions on operations, and account blockages.

How does the automation of the UBO register affect business in Europe?

Reduces compliance costs, accelerates processes, but requires a high level of digital maturity and data security.

What documents are needed for ultimate beneficial owner identification in 2025?

Passport, address proof, ownership documents, corporate resolutions confirming control.

To obtain relevant regulations and official clarifications, I recommend using resources from the European Commission, national regulators, and professional associations.

COREDO’s experience shows: timely adaptation to the new UBO and AML requirements is not only a question of legality but also a strategic advantage in international business. A reliable corporate governance structure, compliance digitalization, and business owner transparency become key factors for sustainable growth and partner trust in 2025.

In 2025, Ukraine unexpectedly found itself at the center of attention of global investors: according to international agencies, the volume of foreign direct investment in the country increased by 37% over the last 18 months, despite ongoing challenges and instability. Behind these figures lies a much more complex picture: rapid growth in domestic demand, large-scale economic recovery programs, activation of international partners and grant initiatives, as well as unprecedented digitalization of business processes. How to build a sustainable strategy and not get lost in the flow of changes? Which industries currently genuinely offer opportunities, and where do risks still outweigh potential?

If you are: an entrepreneur, a manager, or an investor considering doing business with Ukraine in 2025, this article will provide you with not only a strategic framework but also specific tools for registering a business, obtaining licenses, organizing legal support, building export models, and managing risks. The COREDO team has prepared an analytical guide based on their experience in supporting international projects in the EU, Asia, and CIS, as well as on the synthesis of the most recent expert sources. Read to the end — you will get not only answers to key questions but also practical recommendations for achieving your business goals in Ukraine.

Economic Trends in Ukraine 2025

Illustration for the section "Economic Trends in Ukraine 2025" in the article "Business with Ukraine in 2025 – key features and trends"
Economic trends in Ukraine 2025 are forming against the background of the ongoing war and high uncertainty, yet the country is showing signs of gradual recovery and resilience. In these conditions, it’s especially important to understand which factors and sectors will drive the growth of domestic demand and the economy in the near future.

Drivers of Domestic Demand and Economic Growth

In 2025, Ukraine’s economic trends are determined not only by external investments but also by the sustainable growth of domestic demand.

Economic recovery programs coordinated with the support of the EU, IMF, and various international funds have ensured the inflow of grants and credit lines for small and medium-sized businesses. In practice, the COREDO team has observed how clients using these programs have not only restored operations but have also reached new markets by localizing production and implementing digital solutions.

Special attention is given to supporting small and medium businesses: public and private initiatives provide subsidies, tax breaks, and access to educational programs. The domestic demand for local goods and services continues to grow, aided by import substitution programs and the development of e-commerce. However, the war conditions maintain high demand volatility in specific regions, necessitating flexible business models and constant market trend monitoring.

In such conditions, identifying promising investment sectors for the coming year becomes particularly important.

Which Industries to Invest In in 2025

COREDO’s experience confirms that in 2025, the most promising investments in Ukraine remain in agribusiness, agro-processing, IT, logistics, construction, educational services, and green energy projects. Agribusiness Ukraine 2025 shows sustainable export growth of organic products, aided by certification according to EU standards and the development of digital export platforms. Logistics and delivery Ukraine become key drivers for companies focused on export and import, while localizing production helps reduce operational and logistical costs.

In the green energy projects Ukraine segment, there is an increase in investments in solar and wind energy, as well as biogas plants. The COREDO team has implemented several projects on deal structuring in this area, providing clients access to international grants and investment memorandums. Ukraine organic products export is another niche where demand from the EU and Asia exceeds supply, with certification according to EU standards becoming a key competitive advantage.

The Impact of War on Business Models

Conducting business in the conditions of war Ukraine requires entrepreneurs and investors to adopt fundamentally new approaches to risk management and building supply chain resilience. Business models under instability are built on flexibility, supplier diversification, business risk insurance, and the implementation of digital tools for monitoring supply chains. COREDO’s practice shows that companies investing in resilient supply chains and process automation have minimized costs and ensured uninterrupted export operations even during peak logistic disruptions.

Business Registration in Ukraine for Foreigners

Illustration for the section "Business Registration in Ukraine for Foreigners" in the article "Business with Ukraine in 2025 – key features and trends"
Business registration in Ukraine for foreigners is becoming an increasingly sought-after service due to the country’s openness to foreign investments and the simplicity of processes. Still, to ensure the process is quick and error-free, it’s crucial to understand the legal requirements and prepare the necessary documents beforehand. Below, we consider the key steps and nuances important for a foreigner when starting a business in Ukraine in 2025.

How to Start a Business in Ukraine as a Foreigner in 2025

Opening a company in Ukraine for foreigners in 2025 has become more transparent, but on the other hand, requires careful adherence to Due Diligence procedures Ukraine and a deep understanding of local regulatory requirements.

In practice, the process includes the following steps:

  1. Selecting the organizational and legal form (LLC, Joint-Stock Company, Representative Office, etc.)
  2. Preparing a set of founding documents considering the residency requirements for founders and directors.
  3. Undergoing KYC procedures for partners and beneficiaries.
  4. Registering with state registers, opening a bank account, and tax registration.
  5. Obtaining necessary licenses depending on the area of activity.

The COREDO team supports clients at every stage, including legal consultations for foreign companies and comprehensive partner checks. Special attention is given to analyzing investment risks Ukraine, including assessing the reputation of counterparties and compliance with international AML standards.

Legal Barriers and Regulation

Legal barriers for business Ukraine in 2025 are primarily related to currency control, capital repatriation, licensing specifics, and M&A procedures. For European companies, legal risks for doing business in Ukraine include the need for constant monitoring of legislative changes, compliance with beneficiary disclosure requirements, and reporting according to international standards.

COREDO’s solution includes the integration of automated compliance control tools and regular legal audits.

Currency control and restrictions remain one of the key topics for foreign investors:

capital repatriation is only possible with strict AML procedure compliance and source of funds confirmation.

COREDO’s practice shows that comprehensive legal business support Ukraine, including due diligence and financial monitoring, minimizes regulatory risks and accelerates transaction approvals.

EU Certification for Ukrainian Companies

Certification and EU standards for Ukrainian companies are mandatory for entering EU markets and gaining access to international tenders. In 2025, product certification requirements according to EU standards have become stricter, especially for the agro-industrial sector, food industry, and organic producers. The COREDO team has implemented several projects on organic product certification for Ukraine export, providing clients with not only technical support but also legal assistance in the licensing process.

Successfully completing certification requires considering not only technical regulations but also traceability, environmental, and sustainability requirements (ESG requirements for Ukrainian companies). This becomes particularly relevant for companies targeting exports to Germany, France, the Netherlands, and Scandinavian countries.

AML and KYC for Business in Ukraine

Illustration for the section "AML and KYC for Business in Ukraine" in the article "Business with Ukraine in 2025 – key features and trends"
AML and KYC for business in Ukraine are not just formal requirements but essential measures to protect your operations from financial crimes and ensure transparency. In 2025, the application of AML and KYC standards becomes even stricter: businesses will need to implement new client identification procedures and transaction controls in line with updated legislation.

AML and KYC Requirements in 2025

In 2025, AML compliance Ukraine underwent significant changes: new client identification standards were introduced, KYC procedure requirements for partners were expanded, and financial monitoring became mandatory for all companies working with foreign capital. At COREDO, we observe that successfully passing compliance control in Ukraine requires integrating automated platforms for data collection and verification, as well as regularly updating internal policies according to FATF and EU recommendations.

Features of AML compliance for Ukrainian enterprises include mandatory verification of funding sources, real-time transaction monitoring, and reporting suspicious operations. A case from COREDO: for a client entering the EU market, a comprehensive KYC platform was developed integrated with European registers, speeding up the onboarding process and reducing account freeze risks.

Risk Management Tools for Investors

Risk management for foreign investors Ukraine demands a systematic approach: starting with detailed due diligence Ukraine and ending with the implementation of business risk insurance and corporate security tools. COREDO solutions include developing individual liquidity management policies, integrating digital platforms for financial monitoring, and organizing regular stress tests for business models.

In a highly volatile market, the significance of business risk insurance and internal control procedure implementation increases.

For a COREDO client implementing an infrastructure project in Ukraine, a multi-level corporate security system was built, including legal audits, monitoring regulatory changes, and automating investor reporting.

Export and Import of Ukraine: How to Start?

Illustration for the section "Export and Import of Ukraine: How to Start?" in the article "Business with Ukraine in 2025 – key features and trends"
Export and import of Ukraine are not only the foundation of foreign economic relations but also a real opportunity for businesses to enter new markets or diversify supplies. Understanding modern logistic strategies and solutions is essential: that’s why we will review key aspects of export logistics.

Export Logistics: Strategy and Solutions

Export and import Ukraine 2025 require not only a deep understanding of foreign markets but also the implementation of digital platforms for export, allowing small and medium businesses to build effective export strategies and minimize logistic costs. A small business export strategy is built on market diversification, e-commerce Ukraine 2025 utilization, and business process automation.

The COREDO team has supported projects entering the EU and Asian markets, where the integration of digital tools for supply chain management and logistics optimization became crucial success factors.

Utilizing cloud platforms for cargo tracking, automating document flow, and implementing electronic certificates enabled clients to reduce costs and speed up the export process.

EU Customs Barriers for Exports from Ukraine

EU-Ukraine customs barriers remain significant hurdles for exporters, especially in the agro-products and industrial equipment segments. In 2025, product certification requirements according to EU standards became stricter: both technical certification and compliance with sustainability and traceability standards are required.

For several COREDO clients, a project for equipment update and repair Ukraine was implemented to meet new EU regulations, enabling continued access to key markets.

Supply Chain Resilience and Localization

Supply chain resilience is the key factor for companies operating under instability. Supply chain resilience is ensured through Ukraine production localization, supplier diversification, and digital tools for logistics risk monitoring. In practice, COREDO assists clients in building flexible localization models, allowing not only operational cost reductions but also increasing business resilience to external shocks.

Innovation and Digitalization in Business

Illustration for the section "Innovation and Digitalization in Business" in the article "Business with Ukraine in 2025 – key features and trends"
Innovation and digitalization in business provide companies with new growth opportunities, make processes more efficient, and help respond quickly to market changes. These trends require the implementation of modern technologies and reevaluation of conventional business processes, including automation of key operations and shifting to a digital environment.

Digitalization and Business Automation

Digitalizing business processes Ukraine and automating business processes have become integral parts of competitive strategy.

In 2025, e-commerce Ukraine 2025 shows double-digit growth rates, and the emphasis on personnel qualification emerges due to the integration of online training and knowledge management platforms. The COREDO team has implemented projects for ERP systems implementation, financial monitoring automation, and digitalization of export operations, significantly increasing clients’ business process efficiency and transparency.

ESG Requirements for Green Energy Projects

ESG requirements for Ukrainian companies and green energy projects Ukraine become mandatory for accessing international investments and tenders. In 2025, sustainable development is not just a trend but a requirement from regulators and investors. Companies integrating ESG approaches gain access to favorable financing, international grants, and support programs. At COREDO, we support projects on ESG reporting implementation and green energy deal structuring, ensuring compliance with international standards and environmental requirements.

Moving on to opportunities for support and cost optimization, significant advantages for investors include government programs and tax incentives.

Government Support and Tax Incentives for Investors

Government support and tax incentives for investors remain key tools for attracting and stimulating investments in the economy. Modern measures aim to reduce costs, improve business efficiency, and develop strategic projects, expressed in a variety of government support programs and special tax regimes.

Details about existing government programs for business and investment support reveal the main opportunities for entrepreneurs at both federal and regional levels.

Business and Investment Support Programs

Government business support programs in Ukraine in 2025 focus on attracting foreign investors through tax incentives, grants, and investment memorandums. International partners and grants provide funding for startups, agriprojects, green energy initiatives, and export-oriented companies. COREDO’s experience shows that proper preparation of an investment memorandum and meeting selection criteria significantly increase the chances of obtaining support.

How to Obtain Support and Incentives

To receive government support and tax incentives, it is important to properly prepare the documentation package, conduct preliminary due diligence, and clearly justify the project’s economic feasibility. The COREDO team supports clients at all stages, from application submission to financing receipt and legal support for project implementation. Small and medium business support Ukraine is carried out through specialized programs, including for foreign investors, opening additional opportunities for business scaling.

Conclusions and Advice for Entrepreneurs and Investors

Risk/Challenge Solution/Tool Key Terms
Currency Control Compliance, Legal Support currency control, AML, KYC
Logistical Constraints Localization, Supply Chain Resilience logistics, production localization
Legal Barriers Due Diligence, Consultations legal barriers, due diligence
Legislative Instability Constant Monitoring financial monitoring, compliance
EU Export Requirements Certification, EU Standards certification, EU Standards

Actionable advice from COREDO:

  • For business registration in Ukraine in 2025, prepare an expanded document package, considering KYC and AML requirements, and conduct due diligence on potential partners in advance.
  • When entering export markets in the EU and Asia, integrate digital platforms for logistics management and product certification.
  • To minimize investment risks, use business risk insurance tools, automated financial monitoring, and regular legal audits.
  • Implement ESG approaches and green energy projects to access international grants and investment programs.
  • Actively use government support programs, tax incentives, and investment memorandums for business scaling and entering new markets.

COREDO’s practice confirms: a strategic approach, deep understanding of regulatory requirements, and integration of innovative solutions allow not only minimizing risks but also realizing the business potential with Ukraine in 2025.

Expert Analytical Guide-Rating with Practical Review Elements: This format allows me, as the founder of COREDO, to explore the topic of international business registration as deeply and structured as possible. This approach is especially valuable for entrepreneurs, executives, and finance directors who need not only to compare business jurisdictions but also to receive practical recommendations on choosing a country, optimizing tax burdens, undergoing compliance procedures, and opening corporate accounts abroad. The guide with analytics and comparisons saves time, reduces risks, and enables decision-making based on current data and COREDO’s real experience.

Business Registration in Europe and Asia

Illustration for the section "Business Registration in Europe and Asia" in the article "7 Jurisdictions for Quick Business Registration in Europe and Asia"

Did you know that over the last three years, more than 60% of new international companies have chosen Europe and Asia for business registration? This is not just a trend: according to McKinsey, companies opening branches or headquarters in these regions increase operational efficiency by an average of 28% in the first year.

But behind these figures lies a complex reality: the desire to open a company abroad faces bureaucracy, tax uncertainty, and increasingly stringent AML/KYC requirements.

A question I often hear from COREDO clients: how to choose a business jurisdiction so that company registration in Europe or Asia happens quickly, and the business gets the maximum advantages?

Indeed, this decision impacts market entry speed, access to international payment systems, asset protection, and even the ability to attract investments.

In this article, I will thoroughly examine criteria for country selection, conduct a comparative analysis of the 7 best jurisdictions for quick business registration in Europe and Asia, and share practical tips and COREDO case studies. If you want to not just register a business abroad but strategically scale an international company, I recommend reading to the end.

Here you will find not only answers to typical questions but also solutions for complex tasks modern business leaders face.

How to Choose a Business Jurisdiction

Illustration for the section "How to Choose a Business Jurisdiction" in the article "7 Jurisdictions for Quick Business Registration in Europe and Asia"
COREDO’s experience shows: choosing a business jurisdiction is a balance between registration speed, cost, tax burden, and compliance requirements. Here are the key criteria we always analyze for clients:

  • Registration time and cost. Fast company opening is possible in countries with developed digital state services and transparent procedures. For example, business registration in Europe (Estonia, UK) or company registration in Asia (Singapore, Hong Kong) takes from 1 to 5 days. The cost depends on the country and legal form.
  • Document package. Minimum set: charter, information on directors and shareholders, address confirmation, business plan. In some countries (e.g., UAE or Singapore), source of funds confirmation and Due Diligence documents are also required.
  • Tax and compliance aspects. It’s important to consider not only corporate tax rates but also tax benefits for new companies, corporate tax features, automatic tax information exchange requirements (CRS, FATCA), AML/KYC standards.
  • Requirements for founders and directors. Some jurisdictions (e.g., Singapore or Estonia) require a local director or corporate secretary. In other countries, full remote management is possible.
  • Possibility of remote registration. Digitalization of state services and electronic document submission allow opening a company abroad without the founder’s physical presence: this is particularly relevant for international business registration.
In practice, the COREDO team always conducts preliminary compliance analysis to minimize registration or account opening refusal risks and select optimal business jurisdictions considering the industry, ownership structure, and client goals.

Where to Open a Business in Europe and Asia?

Before moving on to a detailed review, here’s a comparison table of key parameters:

Country/Jurisdiction Registration Time Cost (from) Corp. Tax Min. Share Capital Account Opening Features
Georgia 1-3 days from $300 15% 1 lari 3-10 days IT regime, remote
Estonia 1-5 days from €250 20% 0€ 7-14 days e-Residency, online
Cyprus 5-10 days from €1000 12.5% €1000 14-30 days EU, benefits
UAE (Dubai, FEZ) 3-7 days from $3000 0-9% from $0 7-21 days FEZ, licenses
Singapore 1-3 days from $500 17% 1 SGD 14-30 days e-commerce, IT
Hong Kong 1-5 days from $800 16.5% 1 HKD 7-21 days multi-currency
United Kingdom 1-3 days from £100 19% 7-30 days transparency

Business Registration in Georgia for Expats

Georgia: one of the most attractive jurisdictions for starting international business and IT projects. Business registration in Georgia takes 1-3 days, with almost no minimum share capital, and the document package is minimal. IT companies and startups benefit from special tax regimes (Virtual Zone, Small Business Status), reducing the tax burden to 0-5% under certain conditions.

The COREDO team has completed dozens of projects for clients opening companies in Georgia remotely: electronic document submission, remote bank account opening, simple director requirements.

Important to consider: Despite regulator loyalty, banks conduct thorough AML/KYC analysis, especially for non-residents. COREDO’s practice confirms that well-prepared document packages and transparent beneficiary structures significantly speed up the process.

Risks include potential tax regime changes and limited access to European payment systems. Nonetheless, for e-commerce, IT, and service companies, registration in Georgia is the optimal choice for speed, cost, and tax benefits.

Digitization of State Services in Estonia

Estonia is a leader in digitizing government services in Europe. Business registration in Estonia is possible entirely online through the e-Residency system: non-residents receive digital identification and can manage a company remotely, sign documents, file corporate reports, and even open accounts in European banks.

A solution developed by COREDO for clients includes support at all stages: from obtaining e-Residency to opening a corporate account and compliance procedure setup. Corporate tax is 20%, applied only to distributed profits, which is beneficial for reinvestment.
Special attention should be paid to AML/KYC requirements and automatic tax information exchange. Estonia is a transparent jurisdiction, and all beneficiary data is available in an open registry.

For companies targeting the European market, registering a business in the EU through Estonia is a quick and technological route.

For comparison, Cyprus also offers businesses a wide range of tax advantages, discussed in more detail in the next section.

Tax Benefits for Businesses in Cyprus

Cyprus is a classical European jurisdiction for international business structuring and tax optimization. Corporate tax is 12.5%, with a dividend and capital gain tax exemption system under certain conditions, as well as double tax treaties with dozens of countries.

COREDO’s practice has shown that business registration in Cyprus takes 5-10 days, with a minimum share capital of €1000, and flexible requirements for founders and directors. Opening a corporate bank account may take up to a month due to stringent due diligence and AML procedures.

Cyprus is particularly appealing for holding structures, international IT companies, and financial services.

Important to consider: Cyprus actively implements European compliance standards, transparency of beneficiary structures, and automatic tax information exchange.

Business Registration in Dubai in FEZ

The UAE is one of the most dynamically developing jurisdictions for international business registration. Dubai and other emirates have over 40 free economic zones (FEZ), each offering unique conditions: 0% corporate tax (in most FEZs), no currency control, multi-currency settlements, and the possibility of 100% foreign ownership.

The COREDO team has supported business registration projects in Dubai for IT, e-commerce, and financial companies. The process takes 3-7 days, often no minimum share capital required, and a standard document package: charter, passport details, address confirmation, business plan.

For certain types of activities (financial, brokerage, payment services), licensing and extended AML/KYC compliance are required.

Main advantages: flexibility, speed, tax incentives. Risks include high maintenance costs and the need to carefully select the economic zone to meet business needs.

Company Registration in Singapore for IT and e-commerce

Singapore is recognized as a global hub for tech companies, e-commerce, and financial services. Business registration in Singapore takes 1-3 days, with a minimum share capital of 1 SGD, and requirements for founders and directors allow foreigners to own and manage a company remotely with a local director.

COREDO’s solutions for clients not only include registration but also preparation for licensing (financial, crypto, payment services), support for opening a corporate account (process takes 2-4 weeks due to due diligence procedures).

Singapore offers preferential corporate taxation (17% with potential reductions for new companies), a developed asset protection system, and access to international payment systems.

Features: high compliance level, AML/KYC requirements, corporate structure transparency. For IT and e-commerce companies, registering in Singapore is a quick market entry to Southeast Asia and access to venture capital.

Thus, Singapore is the optimal choice for starting and scaling IT projects, and if your company requires multi-currency transactions focusing on the development of Eastern and Southeast Asian markets, consider Hong Kong opportunities.

Hong Kong: Multi-currency Transactions and Asian Markets

Hong Kong is one of the most popular Asian jurisdictions for international business registration. Company registration in Asia through Hong Kong takes 1-5 days, with a minimum share capital of 1 HKD, a corporate tax rate of 16.5%. A feature: the possibility of multi-currency transactions, no currency control, and simplicity in cross-border deals.

COREDO’s experience showed: Banks in Hong Kong have high demands for transparency in structure, sources of funds, and business models. Well-prepared documents and support of due diligence are key for successful corporate account opening.

Hong Kong is ideal for trade, e-commerce, IT, and financial services targeting Chinese and Southeast Asian markets.

Opening a Company in the UK for Business

The UK is one of the fastest and most transparent jurisdictions for business registration in Europe. Opening a company takes 1-3 days, with a minimum share capital of 1 pound and registration costs starting at 100 pounds. The transparency of the beneficiary structure, automatic tax information exchange, and strict AML/KYC standards make the UK a benchmark for corporate transparency.

The COREDO team supports clients at all stages: from choosing a legal form to preparing document packages for due diligence and account opening.

The UK is especially appealing for international holdings, IT companies, and startups targeting the European market.

How to Register a Company Quickly?

Illustration for the section "How to Register a Company Quickly?" in the article "7 Jurisdictions for Quick Business Registration in Europe and Asia"
COREDO’s practice confirms: quickly opening a company abroad is possible only with proper preparation. Here is a step-by-step algorithm:

  1. Choose a jurisdiction considering business goals, industry, tax burden, and compliance requirements.
  2. Prepare a document package: charter, information on directors and shareholders, address confirmation, business plan, AML/KYC documents.
  3. Electronically submit documents via online portals (Estonia, UK, Singapore, Georgia).
  4. Appoint a local director/secretary (if required by law).
  5. Submit the application and pay government fees.
  6. Receive registration documents and a register extract.
  7. Open a corporate bank account (often requires a separate document package and due diligence).
For non-residents and expats, it’s important: many countries allow remote business registration, but banks may request personal identification or video conference.

The COREDO team helps clients avoid typical mistakes – from incorrect form filling to insufficient structure transparency.

Opening a Corporate Account and Passing KYC

Illustration for the section "Opening a Corporate Account and Passing KYC" in the article "7 Jurisdictions for Quick Business Registration in Europe and Asia"
Opening a corporate bank account abroad is one of the most complex stages. Banks in Europe and Asia require:

  • A detailed document package: charter, registration documents, information on beneficiaries, business plan, source of funds confirmation.
  • Passing compliance procedures: checks according to international AML/KYC standards, automatic tax information exchange (CRS, FATCA).
  • Due diligence: analysis of business model, income sources, reputation of the founders.
Risks of refusal, insufficient transparency, complex structure, absence of confirmed sources of funds.

A solution developed by COREDO includes preliminary compliance audit and preparation for the bank interview, greatly increasing successful account opening chances.

Comparison of Jurisdictions, Risks, and Taxes

Jurisdiction Tax Advantages Risks and Pitfalls Features for IT/e-commerce/financial companies
Georgia Preferential regimes for IT, low tax Limited access to EU payments Ideal for startups, service companies
Estonia Tax only on distributed profits Transparency of beneficiaries e-Residency, process automation
Cyprus 12.5% tax, dividend benefits Strict due diligence, compliance Holdings, international structures
UAE 0-9% tax, FEZ, multi-currency High service cost Licenses, flexibility for e-commerce
Singapore 17% tax, benefits for new companies Strict compliance, local director IT, finance, e-commerce
Hong Kong 16.5% tax, multi-currency Strict bank compliance Trade, IT, access to China
UK 19% tax, transparency High reporting requirements Holdings, startups, international projects

For IT, e-commerce, and financial companies, it is essential to consider not only tax rates but also corporate reporting requirements, currency control, asset protection, and profit reinvestment opportunities.

COREDO’s experience shows: typical mistakes include choosing a jurisdiction without considering industry requirements and underestimating compliance risks.

How to Choose a Business Jurisdiction?

Illustration for the section "How to Choose a Business Jurisdiction?" in the article "7 Jurisdictions for Quick Business Registration in Europe and Asia"
Choosing a country for business registration: a strategic decision affecting scaling, access to investments, and asset protection. Selection criteria:

  • Business goals: entering new markets, tax optimization, intellectual property protection.
  • Industry specifics: activity licensing (financial, IT, trade), corporate structure requirements.
  • Reporting and transparency requirements: automatic tax information exchange, AML/KYC standards.
  • Possibility of remote management: electronic document submission, e-Residency, online banking.
COREDO’s practice confirms: professional legal support reduces risks, speeds up the process, and ensures compliance with international standards.

Successful cases include: registering an IT company in Singapore with subsequent licensing of a payment service, structuring a holding in Cyprus to enter the European market, supporting business registration in Dubai for e-commerce with multi-currency transactions.

Conclusions and Steps for Entrepreneurs

  • Registration of a business in Europe and Asia is not just quick company opening but also a strategic scaling tool.
  • Prepare a checklist: business goals, industry requirements, tax burden, compliance, document packages.
  • Avoid typical mistakes: underestimating compliance, choosing jurisdictions without considering banking requirements, lack of structural transparency.
  • Assess the ROI of business registration: consider not only the cost and time but also long-term benefits: asset protection, market access, tax incentives.
  • Seek consultation: COREDO’s experience in international business registration, licensing, and compliance is your reliable resource for making strategic decisions.
If you plan to open a company abroad, enter EU or Asian markets, or look for optimal business jurisdictions, the COREDO team is ready to become your long-term partner at all stages of international registration and support.

In 2025, the global metallurgical business under sanctions is experiencing tectonic shifts: according to Worldsteel data, in the past year alone, more than 18% of global metal export transactions have been directly or indirectly restricted, and the overall volume of the EU and NSDC sanctions lists has grown by nearly one-third. Unexpected fact: as a result of new sanctions from the European Commission and synchronized regimes with Ukraine, more than 70% of companies that previously considered themselves “low-risk” are now facing the need for urgent transformation of corporate structures and compliance processes.

Sanctions 2025 metallurgy – these are not just formal restrictions but a complex of new requirements for transparency, risk management, control of transactions with precious metals, and the implementation of ESG standards. International sanctions in metallurgy change not only the geography of exports but also the very logic of business conduct: from Due Diligence of partners to compliance automation and restructuring supply chains.

Owners, top managers, and compliance officers face a challenge: how to not only survive but also maintain export margins under sanctions, minimize sanction risks for metallurgy, and ensure sustainability under new conditions.

In this article, I, Nikita Veremeev, share the experience of COREDO: we will analyze key changes for metallurgical companies in 2025, show how regulations in the metallurgical business and metallurgy compliance become strategic assets, and offer practical solutions for adapting to the new realities. If you want not just to follow trends but to manage them, I recommend reading the material to the end.

Changes for metallurgy in 2025: sanctions, regulation

Illustration for the section "Changes for metallurgy in 2025: sanctions, regulation" in the article "Metallurgical business under sanctions – key changes 2025"
Changes for metallurgy in 2025 are largely defined by the tightening of sanctions and increased government regulations from key global economies. New trade restrictions, updated sanctions lists, and regulatory barriers significantly change the working conditions of metallurgical companies, requiring the industry to adapt to new risks and challenges.

Expert summary: what is it?

The year 2025 was a turning point for regulating the metallurgical business: tightened requirements for corporate structures, compliance, and AML, enhanced control of international supply chains, and ESG standards came to the forefront. COREDO’s experience confirms: companies that timely integrated sanctions compliance and automated KYC/AML not only retained access to key markets but also increased their investment attractiveness.

EU sanctions against Russia: 18th package and Ukraine

The 18th EU sanctions package against metallurgy became the largest in recent years: the EU and NSDC sanctions lists were expanded, new restrictions were introduced on the export of steel, aluminum, rare earth metals, and stricter control over transactions with precious metals and stones was enforced. The synchronization of EU and Ukrainian sanctions means that even transactions through third countries now require deep partner verification and the integration of sanctions lists into business processes.

The COREDO team implemented projects to adapt metallurgical holdings’ corporate structures to new requirements:

for example, for a client with assets in the EU and Asia, an automatic verification module for all partners against the EU and NSDC sanctions lists was implemented, reducing the risks of secondary sanctions and account blocking.

In the face of tighter regulation, this requires even more attention to complying with AML and KYC standards, which are becoming an integral part of metallurgical companies’ operations.

AML and KYC requirements in metallurgy

Starting in 2025, updated FATF standards and EU directives on AML for metallurgical companies came into force: now KYC procedures are mandatory for all new partners, as well as regular monitoring of operations with precious metals, investment coins, and bullion.

Anti-money laundering legislation for metallurgy requires the implementation of automated compliance platforms, integration of bank monitoring, and control of operations with valuables.
COREDO’s practice shows: automation of AML/KYC significantly reduces costs and minimizes the human factor. In one case for an international trader, transaction monitoring tools through counterparty banks were implemented, allowing the detection of suspicious operations in real-time and preventing fines for sanctions violations.

ESG and supply chain transparency

In 2025, ESG requirements and new reporting standards become mandatory for metallurgical companies operating in the EU, UK, Singapore, and Dubai. International reporting standards require transparency of the corporate structure, disclosure of ultimate beneficiaries, and control of the entire supply chain from ore extraction to the export of finished products.

A solution developed at COREDO allows integrating ESG indicators and reporting according to international standards into a single compliance platform, ensuring supply chain transparency and compliance with both European and Asian regulators’ requirements.

Metal exports under sanctions: risks and markets

Illustration for the section "Metal exports under sanctions: risks and markets" in the article "Metallurgical business under sanctions – key changes 2025"
Metal exports under sanctions inevitably face new risks and a forced reorientation of markets. Tough restrictions from the EU and other countries require companies to seek alternative routes and reduce export margins, changing the usual industry structure.

Expert summary: what is it?

Metal exports under sanctions: an area of increased risks and new opportunities. In 2025, restrictions extend not only to traditional EU markets but also to transactions with rare earth metals, precious metals and stones, investment coins, and bullion. COREDO’s experience shows: smart market diversification and transaction structuring allow maintaining export margins even under stricter sanctions.

Export restrictions: countries, products, banks

Sanctions 2025 metallurgy introduces direct and indirect restrictions on the export of steel, aluminum, nickel, as well as products with high rare earth metals content. Particular attention is paid to the control of counterparty banks in metal transactions:

most European and Asian banks conduct in-depth monitoring of the origin of funds and the supply chain, and in some jurisdictions (e.g., Singapore and the UK), investment restrictions have been introduced for metallurgical companies associated with sanctioned entities.

The COREDO team successfully implemented projects to structure cross-border metal transactions through SPVs and holding companies in the EU and Asia, allowing clients to minimize the risks of payment blocking and maintain access to international supply chains.

Rules for deals with gold and diamonds 2025

Control over transactions with precious metals in 2025 has tightened: now deals with gold, diamonds, investment coins, and bullion require mandatory compliance checks and monitoring of operations with precious metals. New rules for gold and diamond transactions have been introduced, including control of jewelry operations, mandatory disclosure of ultimate beneficiaries, and integration of data into international registries.

In one of COREDO’s cases for a client from the EU, a control system for operations with investment coins and bullion was implemented, allowing tracking asset movements at all stages of the transaction and ensuring compliance with new AML/KYC requirements.

Circumventing sanctions: alternative markets

In the context of the 2025 sanctions, metallurgy is actively seeking alternative markets: Asia, Africa, and the Middle East are becoming new centers of demand for metal products. However, schemes for bypassing sanctions in metallurgy require special caution: structuring transactions through “nesting doll” firms, alternative supply routes, and using SPVs must be accompanied by thorough due diligence and legal audits.

COREDO’s practice confirms: only legitimate structuring and transparent corporate structure can avoid secondary sanctions risks and maintain business investment attractiveness.

Sanctions risk verification: due diligence and automation

Illustration for the section "Sanctions risk verification: due diligence and automation" in the article "Metallurgical business under sanctions – key changes 2025"
Sanctions risk verification today requires not only deep due diligence but also modern automation tools to identify potential threats at the early stages of working with counterparties.

This approach allows companies to minimize the likelihood of violating sanctions legislation and reduce operational and reputational risks.

Below are the key stages of comprehensive verification and the role of the expert summary in this process.

Expert summary: what is it?

Sanctions risks for metallurgy in 2025 demand not just formal compliance but comprehensive risk management: from counterparty checks to automation of compliance processes and integration of digital platforms for transaction monitoring.

COREDO’s experience shows that timely due diligence of partners and automation of metal transactions checks significantly reduces the likelihood of fines and legal disputes.

Counterparty verification, new rules and methods

Counterparty verification metallurgy: a key element of managing sanctions risks. New requirements include mandatory compliance checks for metal transactions, integration of the EU and NSDC sanctions lists, and the use of digital platforms for counterparty verification (e.g., LIGA360).

Particular attention is paid to identifying toxic company ties and risks for new partners in metallurgy.

In one of the implemented COREDO projects, automatic integration of sanctions lists into the onboarding process of new partners was introduced, allowing a client from the Czech Republic to identify potential risks at the preliminary analysis stage of the deal.

Compliance and transaction monitoring automation

Modern compliance tools for metallurgy allow automating compliance processes, monitoring transactions through banks, and integrating AML/KYC procedures. Innovative risk management methods, such as automatic transaction scoring and monitoring operations with precious metals, have become an obligatory standard for companies operating in the EU, Asia, and Africa.

COREDO’s solution for compliance process automation includes integrating digital platforms for counterparty verification, saving time and resources, and minimizing the human factor in identifying sanctions risks.

Fines for sanction violations: judicial practice

In 2025, judicial practice on sanction cases in metallurgy expanded significantly: the number of cases of sanction regime violations increased by 40%, and fines for violating new rules reach tens of millions of euros. Special attention is paid to the subsidiary liability of deal participants and the corporate structure of metallurgical holdings.

COREDO’s practice shows that only regular audits of connections and corporate structure transparency minimize the risks of legal disputes and fines for violating the sanction regime.

Business registration in metallurgy under sanctions

Illustration for the section "Business registration in metallurgy under sanctions" in the article "Metallurgical business under sanctions – key changes 2025"
In the modern context, business registration in metallurgy faces serious restrictions due to sanctions imposed on key Russian industry enterprises. Understanding the nuances of legal regulation and the specifics of the current sanctions policy becomes critically important for those planning to work in this sector.

Expert summary: what is it?

company registration in the metallurgical sector of the EU/Asia in 2025 requires not only compliance with formal procedures but also a deep understanding of new requirements for corporate structure, compliance, and tax burden optimization. COREDO’s experience in supporting international projects confirms: smart business structuring is the key to sustainability and investment attractiveness under sanctions.

Thanks to this approach, the chosen jurisdiction and company form will best match business goals, which we will consider further.

Company registration in the EU and Asia

In 2025, the registration of metallurgical companies in the EU and Asia entails the preparation of an extended package of documents: charter, information about ultimate beneficiaries, confirmation of source of funds, licenses for certain activities, and also Opening bank accounts in jurisdictions with a high level of regulation. Requirements for founders have tightened: a check for absence in sanctions lists and confirmation of the legality of capital origin are mandatory.

The COREDO team supports clients at all registration stages: from choosing the optimal jurisdiction (Czech Republic, Slovakia, Cyprus, Estonia, Singapore, Dubai) to obtaining licenses and opening bank accounts, ensuring full compliance with new requirements.

Tax optimization and business compliance

Tax burden optimization for metallurgical companies in 2025 is impossible without smart corporate structuring: the use of SPVs, holdings, “nesting doll” firms, and transparent ownership schemes allows minimizing risks of subsidiary liability and investment restrictions.

Special attention is paid to compliance with new requirements for the corporate structure of metallurgical companies and the integration of compliance procedures at all levels.

COREDO’s solutions include auditing corporate structure, implementing due diligence, and compliance automation, allowing clients not just reduce tax burdens but also increase transparency for international partners and banks.

Risks of new partners for business

In 2025, risks for new partners in metallurgy and toxic company ties come to the forefront: sanctions lists are updated monthly, and judicial practice on subsidiary liability is becoming increasingly strict. Integrating due diligence and conducting regular audits of ties is a mandatory element of business protection.

The COREDO team has implemented cases for identifying and eliminating toxic ties in clients’ corporate structures, preventing account blocking, and maintaining access to international markets.

What metallurgical companies should do under sanctions

Illustration for the section "What metallurgical companies should do under sanctions" in the article "Metallurgical business under sanctions – key changes 2025"
Sanctions continue to exert significant pressure on metallurgical companies facing new restrictions and challenges in conducting foreign economic activities. In the current situation, it is especially important to understand what metallurgical companies should do under sanctions to maintain business sustainability and find new opportunities for growth.

Expert summary: what is it?

In the face of tightening regulation of the metallurgical business and increasing sanction risks, only the implementation of best compliance practices, process automation, and strategic risk management allow companies not only to survive but to scale. COREDO’s experience confirms: timely adaptation to new requirements ensures business sustainability and profitability.

Supply chain transparency: how to meet standards

Supply chain transparency in metallurgy: a key factor in compliance with international reporting standards and ESG.

The use of digital platforms for monitoring supply chains, integration of ESG indicators, and regular reporting according to international standards allow companies to maintain partner trust and access to financing.

COREDO implements solutions that allow automating the collection and analysis of data across the entire supply chain, ensuring transparency and compliance with Worldsteel, European Commission, and FATF requirements.

Technological innovations and automation

Technological innovations in metallurgy for bypassing sanctions include compliance process automation, implementation of digital platforms for counterparty verification and monitoring operations with precious metals. Compliance tools for metallurgy make it possible to identify risks in real-time and react quickly to changes in sanctions regulation.

In one of COREDO’s projects for a client from the UK, an automated system for monitoring metal transactions was implemented, reducing compliance costs by 30% and increasing decision-making speed.

Short-term and long-term ROI strategies

In the conditions of the 2025 sanctions, metallurgy requires a strategic approach to investment and business scaling. Export margins under sanctions are maintained only through market diversification, corporate structure optimization, and implementation of innovative risk management methods. ROI in the metallurgical business under sanctions depends on the company’s ability to quickly adapt to new requirements and leverage alternative market opportunities.

COREDO supports clients at all stages of business scaling: from company registration in new jurisdictions to the implementation of automated compliance solutions and tax burden optimization.

Recommendations for metallurgical companies

Key Change Practical Actions Main Risks Tools and Solutions
18th EU sanctions package Check counterparties, update KYC Secondary sanctions, account blockage LIGA360, integration of sanctions lists
New AML/compliance requirements Implement automation, train personnel Fines, loss of license Compliance platforms, training
Metal export restrictions Market diversification, transaction structuring Market loss, reduced margins Alternative routes, SPV
Corporate structure requirements Structure optimization, connection audit Subsidiary liability Due diligence, legal audit

Checklist for a metallurgical company

  • Conduct an audit of corporate structure and connections to ensure compliance with new sanctions requirements.
  • Implement automated platforms for counterparty verification and transaction monitoring.
  • Update internal AML/KYC policies and train staff on new standards.
  • Ensure supply chain transparency and integrate ESG indicators into reporting.
  • Develop a strategy for market diversification and transaction structuring through SPVs and holdings.
  • Regularly conduct due diligence on new partners and audit toxic connections.
  • Monitor judicial practice and updates of EU and NSDC sanctions lists.

If you wish to receive an individual consultation, conduct an audit, or implement a comprehensive compliance solution: the COREDO team is ready to offer the best practices and tools proven in international markets.

Company Registration in Seychelles for Crypto Business in 2025 is becoming increasingly relevant for startups and investors seeking optimal conditions for international operations with digital assets. Seychelles offers an attractive jurisdiction with modern regulations and a fast company formation process, which is crucial for the rapidly growing crypto market. Below, we will take a closer look at the main advantages of registering a company for crypto business specifically in Seychelles.

Company Registration in Seychelles: Advantages

Registering legal entities in Seychelles continues to attract entrepreneurs thanks to a combination of flexibility, speed, and cost optimization. The practice of COREDO confirms that for crypto business in 2025, the key advantages are:
  • Minimal registration timelines: from 1 to 3 days, including preparation of founding documents and opening a corporate account.
  • Lenient capitalization requirements: from $25,000, which is significantly lower than in most European jurisdictions.
  • Possibility of involving non-residents as shareholders and directors, which is particularly important for international teams.
  • Investment attractiveness of offshore: Seychelles offers effective tax optimization strategies, and fiduciary services allow for building a transparent and manageable structure.

Solutions developed at COREDO enable clients to quickly integrate Seychelles structures into international payment systems, accelerating project launches and reducing barriers to entry into Asian and African markets.

Thus, Seychelles remains one of the most efficient jurisdictions for a quick start in the crypto business. However, the choice of the country depends on the development strategy and specifics of the target markets.

Where to Start a Crypto Business: Seychelles, EU, Asia, Africa

Choosing a jurisdiction for a crypto business in 2025 is a strategic question. Analyzing COREDO clients’ experience, we note several key criteria:

  • Seychelles: Lenient regulation, fast registration times, moderate economic presence requirements, but moderate reputational risks.
  • EU (MiCA): Strict regulatory requirements, lengthy licensing process, minimal reputational risks, but high costs and legal barriers to scaling.
  • Asia (Singapore, Hong Kong): High level of banking infrastructure, developed international payment systems, but tightening of AML and KYC procedures.
  • Africa (Mauritius, South Africa): Prospects for crypto market development, flexible conditions for non-residents, but limited banking infrastructure.
COREDO’s practice showed that for startups and scalable projects, Seychelles often become an optimal launching pad, allowing minimization of legal barriers and quick testing of business models in the international market.

MiCA: Impact on Crypto Business in the EU

Illustration for the section "MiCA: Impact on Crypto Business in the EU" in the article "Seychelles Still a Relevant Alternative to MiCA in 2025"
MiCA introduces unified rules for crypto business in the EU, significantly impacting the regulation and operation of the industry. The new approach is aimed not only at increasing transparency and protecting investors but also at creating a stable environment for developing digital assets and services. Below, we examine the main MiCA requirements for crypto companies and their practical implications for business in Europe.

MiCA Requirements for Crypto Companies

Markets in Crypto Assets Regulation (MiCA) is a new regulatory standard for crypto assets in the EU that came into effect in 2025. To get licensed, crypto companies must:

  • Ensure transparency of the beneficial ownership structure.
  • Implement strict KYC/AML procedures and customer identification technologies.
  • Prepare internal policies for risk management, asset protection, and reporting.
  • Comply with FATF standards and capital requirements (at least €125,000 for providers of crypto asset services).
  • Appoint resident directors and ensure real economic presence.

The COREDO team has implemented projects preparing crypto companies for licensing in the EU, and I can note: the level of compliance risks and the cost of support within MiCA are significantly higher than in offshore jurisdictions.

Banking Requirements and Sanctions

Since 2024, European banks have tightened checks when opening accounts for crypto businesses. Among the new requirements:

  • Verification of the source of funds and corporate structure transparency.
  • Mandatory availability of multi-currency accounts and integration with international payment systems.
  • Increased attention to sanction risks and the origin of beneficiaries.
As a result, according to COREDO, more than 30% of account opening applications in the EU are rejected due to non-compliance with the new standards or suspicions of non-transparency. This makes alternative jurisdictions, such as Seychelles, particularly relevant for companies focused on rapid scaling and flexibility.

In this regard, the role of regulation and AML requirements for crypto business in Seychelles becomes key as of 2025.

Seychelles Crypto License and AML in 2025

Illustration for the section "Seychelles Crypto License and AML in 2025" in the article "Seychelles Still a Relevant Alternative to MiCA in 2025"
Seychelles Crypto License and AML in 2025 become key concepts for those planning to launch or expand a crypto project in this jurisdictional center. The new rules place special emphasis on business transparency and AML standards compliance, which requires serious preparation for obtaining a license and ongoing compliance with requirements.

Obtaining a Crypto License in Seychelles in 2025

COREDO’s experience shows that obtaining a crypto license in Seychelles in 2025 involves the following stages:

  1. Preparation of a business plan and internal AML/KYC policy, the document must reflect the specifics of crypto services, funding sources, and anti-money laundering measures.
  2. Collecting and submitting documents: founding documents, information about beneficiaries, confirmation of economic presence (office, resident director).
  3. Developing technical infrastructure: ensuring the security of storing and transferring digital assets.
  4. Liability insurance is recommended to reduce operational and legal risks.
  5. Submitting an application to the regulatory body and undergoing AML checks.
COREDO’s client support solutions at all stages significantly speed up the process and minimize the likelihood of rejection.

Requirements for Economic Presence and Management

From 2025, banks and regulators in Seychelles tightened control over the economic substance of companies. For successful account opening and obtaining a license, it is required:

  • A physical office in Seychelles.
  • Appointment of a resident director.
  • Maintaining corporate documentation and reporting in accordance with local laws.
  • Transparency of the beneficial ownership structure.
COREDO’s practice confirms: the implementation of modern corporate governance tools and fiduciary services not only meets the regulatory requirements but also increases trust from banks and partners.

AML for Offshore Companies: FATF Standards

Compliance with FATF standards and the implementation of effective KYC/AML procedures is key to business sustainability in Seychelles. COREDO recommends:

  • Using modern client identification technologies (video-KYC, biometrics).
  • Regularly updating internal AML policies and training staff.
  • Conducting independent compliance audits.
  • Implementing transaction monitoring systems and automated reports for regulators.
Such measures minimize compliance risks and reduce the likelihood of account freezes, which is especially important for offshore companies working with digital assets.

Opening an Account in Seychelles 2025: Challenges and Solutions

Illustration for the section "Opening an Account in Seychelles 2025: Challenges and Solutions" in the article "Seychelles Still a Relevant Alternative to MiCA in 2025"
Opening an account in Seychelles in 2025 involves a number of specific challenges that need to be considered in advance. With the tightening of document checks and compliance procedure requirements, many entrepreneurs are seeking effective solutions for successfully navigating banking procedures and minimizing rejection risks.

Reasons for Rejections and How to Avoid Them

In 2025, the tightening of banking requirements in Seychelles led to an increase in the number of account opening rejections. The most common reasons:

  • Insufficient transparency of the company’s structure and beneficial ownership.
  • Absence of actual economic presence.
  • Non-compliance of internal AML/KYC policies with bank standards.
  • Suspicions of sanction circumvention or operations with high-risk countries.
COREDO’s experience shows: to minimize the likelihood of rejection, it is important to prepare a complete set of documents in advance, ensure corporate structure transparency, and implement modern compliance procedures.

Banking Infrastructure in Seychelles and Competitors

Seychelles banking infrastructure offers flexibility but requires special attention to compliance. In comparison with Hong Kong:

  • Seychelles: More lenient conditions for non-residents, but higher risk of account freezes with insufficient compliance.
  • Hong Kong: Developed banking system, integration with international payment systems, but stricter checks and longer account opening process.
COREDO’s solutions for selecting banking partners and supporting clients significantly increase the chances of successfully opening multi-currency accounts and integrating with international payment systems.

Risks of Registering a Crypto Business in Seychelles

Illustration for the section "Risks of Registering a Crypto Business in Seychelles" in the article "Seychelles Still a Relevant Alternative to MiCA in 2025"
Risks of registering a crypto business in Seychelles go far beyond standard legal formalities; it is a whole set of new challenges related to tightening legislation, compliance requirements, and changes in crypto industry regulation. It is important for entrepreneurs to understand how potential barriers may affect investment efficiency to properly evaluate ROI when choosing this jurisdiction.

Efficiency Metrics and ROI When Choosing Jurisdiction: How to Calculate?

To assess the efficiency of jurisdiction selection, COREDO uses a set of metrics:

  • Speed of business registration and launch.
  • Total costs of Licensing and support.
  • Availability of banking and payment tools.
  • Return on Investment (ROI) – compared to the EU, ROI when choosing Seychelles is higher due to low operational costs and quick market entry.
  • Scalability flexibility, opportunity to open branches and integrate into international payment systems.
Tax optimization strategies and effective corporate governance implemented by the COREDO team allow clients to significantly increase the investment attractiveness of offshore structures.

Scaling: Prospects and Risks

Business scaling through Seychelles structures is possible, provided that international AML/KYC standards are met and regulatory changes are continuously monitored. Among the long-term risks:

  • Possible legislative changes in the EU and tightening control over offshore companies.
  • Reputational risks associated with the perception of offshore jurisdictions.
  • Restrictions on access to some international payment systems.
COREDO’s practice shows: regular compliance audits and corporate structure transparency can minimize these risks and ensure sustainable business development.

Seychelles or MiCA for Crypto Business in 2025

Illustration for the section "Seychelles or MiCA for Crypto Business in 2025" in the article "Seychelles Still a Relevant Alternative to MiCA in 2025"
In 2025, the crypto business faces the choice of operating under MiCA rules in the European Union or focusing on more flexible regimes, such as in Seychelles. Differences in regulation directly influence licensing requirements, compliance, and access to global markets. How to minimize compliance risks when choosing between these jurisdictions?

How to Reduce Compliance Risks?

  • Conduct a preliminary audit of the corporate structure and beneficial ownership.
  • Develop and implement internal AML/KYC policies per FATF standards.
  • Ensure a real economic presence (office, resident director, local reporting).
  • Prepare a complete set of documents for the bank and regulator.
  • Use modern client identification technologies.
  • Regularly update compliance procedures and undergo independent checks.
  • Implement corporate governance tools and fiduciary services to enhance transparency.

Seychelles or MiCA: Comparison of Conditions

Criterion Seychelles (2025) MiCA (EU, 2025)
Registration speed 1-3 days 2-4 weeks
Capital requirements from $25,000 to $100,000 from €125,000
AML/KYC Lenient but per FATF standards Strict, mandatory
Banking infrastructure Complex, but solutions exist More stable, but strict checks
Real economic presence Requires office and resident director Requires office, employees, substance
Reputational risks Medium Minimal
Scalability potential High Medium

Conclusions and Recommendations for Business

Seychelles in 2025 is not just an offshore alternative to MiCA but a strategic tool for quickly launching and scaling a crypto business considering current regulatory and banking trends. COREDO’s experience shows that with the competent implementation of compliance strategies, the adoption of modern AML/KYC procedures, and transparency in corporate structure, risks can be minimized, and advantages can be capitalized on.

It is recommended to consider Seychelles as a flexible platform for international business, especially if your goal is a quick entry into Asian and African markets, cost optimization, and maintaining control over the corporate structure. The key to success is professional support at all stages, regular compliance audits, and readiness to adapt to changes in global regulation.

COREDO’s team is ready to offer comprehensive solutions tailored to your business’s specifics and provide reliable support in implementing international projects.

Offshore jurisdictions are special territories with a distinct economic status that offer companies significant tax benefits and simplified business regulations. Let’s delve deeper into what offshore zones and companies are, the tasks they solve, and why they are in demand among international businesses.

Offshore Zones and Companies – What Are They?

Offshore zones are jurisdictions with a special tax and regulatory regime aimed at attracting foreign capital and providing maximum flexibility for businesses. In 2025, the concept of “offshore” went beyond the classic tax minimization schemes: it is now a tool for international tax planning, corporate mobility, and asset protection.
Modern offshore companies are not just entities with zero tax but also active participants in global markets required to comply with tax residency, corporate governance, and transparency requirements.
The practice of COREDO confirms: the key distinction between classical and modern offshore lies in the level of integration into the international financial system and readiness to disclose information according to FATF and OECD standards.

Offshore Requirements in 2025

The year 2025 became a point of no return for offshore business. New offshore requirements for 2025 include tightening substance requirements (economic presence), mandatory disclosure of ultimate beneficiaries, and automatic tax information exchange (CRS).
In our work at COREDO, we see that the influence of international agreements (FATF, G20, OECD) and sanctions compelled jurisdictions to implement multi-level control mechanisms: from mandatory corporate reporting to compliance digitalization.
The regulatory changes of 2025 affected not only the offshore zones of the Caribbean region but also traditionally stable jurisdictions in the EU and Asia. Now, registering an offshore company is not just a formality but a complex procedure requiring a deep understanding of international transparency standards.

Offshore Regulation in 2025 – Main Trends

Illustration for the section "Offshore Regulation in 2025 - Main Trends" in the article "Offshore Jurisdictions 2025 – Concept, Regulation, Operation"
Offshore regulation in 2025 faces unprecedented strengthening of transparency and control requirements. Key trends include the implementation of international standards for beneficiary disclosure, the expansion of automatic financial information exchange, and new requirements for the real presence of companies in offshore jurisdictions. These changes are designed to enhance business legitimacy and minimize the risk of abuses.

Disclosure of Beneficiaries According to International Standards

Beneficiary disclosure in offshores has become a central element of international transparency standards. By 2025, most jurisdictions have implemented public or limited-access registries of ultimate beneficiaries, and registration agents must conduct enhanced KYC procedures and Due Diligence.
In different countries, disclosure requirements vary: for example, in Estonia and the UK, data is publicly available, while in Belize, it is only available upon request from regulators.

COREDO’s solution for clients with holding structures includes a multi-level system for controlling data relevance and automating beneficiary checks when the ownership structure changes.

Financial Reporting of Offshore Companies

Financial reporting of offshore companies in 2025 has become mandatory in almost all popular jurisdictions. Even in countries with zero tax, such as BVI or Belize, there are requirements for annual reporting and, for certain categories of business: mandatory auditing.
Reporting automation and compliance digitalization help to reduce operational risks and meet compliance officer requirements in real-time.

In one of COREDO’s cases for an IT company with offices in Singapore and Dubai, we implemented an integrated platform for corporate reporting preparation, which not only aligned with new standards but also increased transparency for banks and investors.

Economic Presence and Substance Requirements

Economic presence of offshore structures (substance requirements): a key criterion for recognizing a company as a real tax resident. In 2025, most jurisdictions require the presence of a real office, staff, management decisions on-site, and the maintenance of corporate documentation.
In COREDO’s practice, there are cases where clients underestimated the importance of substance, leading to refusals in opening bank accounts or inclusion in offshore blacklists (EU Blacklist).

For international holdings and investment funds, we develop individual corporate governance models ensuring compliance with substance requirements and minimizing cross-border taxation risks.

Compliance and AML in Offshores

Modern compliance and AML requirements in offshore jurisdictions include mandatory implementation of KYC procedures, regular financial monitoring, appointment of a compliance officer, and independent due diligence.
Anti-money laundering legislation (AML, CFT) is integrated into the national norms of almost all offshore zones, and violations of these standards lead to account blocking and loss of tax benefits.

The COREDO team has implemented comprehensive compliance procedures for clients working in fintech and crypto services, allowing them to not only pass bank compliance but also to reduce the risks of being blacklisted.

Next, let’s examine the best offshore jurisdictions that remain relevant and attractive for international business in 2025.

Best Offshore Zones 2025

Illustration for the section "Best Offshore Zones 2025" in the article "Offshore Jurisdictions 2025 – Concept, Regulation, Operation"
choosing a jurisdiction for company registration directly affects asset security and the efficiency of tax burdens. The best offshore zones of 2025 offer special conditions for international business, from flexible corporate procedures to modern regulation and reputation on the global market. Next, let’s understand how to navigate the diversity of offshore directions and choose the best option for your business.

How to Choose an Offshore Zone for Business

Choosing an offshore zone for business in 2025 requires assessing not only tax benefits but also the jurisdiction’s resilience to regulatory changes, the quality of banking infrastructure, the level of data protection, and reputational risks.
COREDO’s experience shows: a strategic mistake is to focus only on low taxes. It is important to consider substance requirements, transparency, the presence of qualified corporate service providers, and the availability of banking services.

Managing reputational risks becomes an integral part of corporate support for offshores, especially for companies working with international contractors and investors.

Offshore Jurisdictions 2025, Comparison

Jurisdiction Taxes Reporting Requirements AML/KYC Substance Bank Accounts
BVI 0% Minimal Yes No Medium
Belize 0% Mandatory from 2025 Yes Partial Restricted
Cyprus 12.5% Mandatory Yes Yes High
Estonia 0%/20% Mandatory Yes Yes High
Singapore 17% Mandatory Yes Yes High
Dubai (UAE) 0%/9% Mandatory Yes Partial High
Seychelles 0% Mandatory Yes Partial Medium
United Kingdom 19% Mandatory Yes Yes High
Mauritius 15% Mandatory Yes Yes Medium
Hong Kong 8.25% Mandatory Yes Yes High
These data reflect key trends: stricter reporting, mandatory AML/KYC, increased substance requirements, and a reduction in the number of banks opening accounts for offshore structures without real presence.

Offshore Zones for IT and Investment Funds

For IT businesses and investment funds in 2025, jurisdictions with developed digital infrastructure, flexible substance requirements, and understandable corporate structuring rules remain optimal.
In COREDO’s cases for IT companies, we recommend Estonia, Singapore, and Dubai, where it’s easy to ensure corporate mobility, automate reporting, and use tax incentives for foreign investors.

For investment funds and trusts, Cyprus, Mauritius, and the British Virgin Islands are relevant due to the flexibility of regulation and support for international agreements (DTAA, TIEA).

Offshore Company Registration: Step by Step

Illustration for the section "Offshore Company Registration: Step by Step" in the article "Offshore Jurisdictions 2025 – Concept, Regulation, Operation"
Offshore Company Registration: Step by Step: this is a sequential process that includes choosing a country, preparing documents, and interacting with a registration agent. At each stage, it’s important to consider the nuances of the chosen jurisdiction’s legislation, as the correct document preparation depends on the successful start of the offshore business.

How to Choose a Registration Agent and Prepare Documents

Registration of an offshore company begins with the preparation of a document package: founding documents, information about beneficiaries, address and identification confirmation, business plan (for some jurisdictions).

The role of registration agents is not only to submit documents but also to conduct comprehensive due diligence and KYC procedures.

In a COREDO case on registering a company in Belize in 2025, we provided the client with full support, from document collection to interacting with local registrars and implementing digital tools for monitoring legal changes.

Open an Offshore Company Account

In 2025, banks impose higher requirements on offshore companies: confirmation of economic presence, a transparent ownership structure, corporate reporting, compliance with CRS and AML.
Only jurisdictions with developed banking infrastructures and high levels of compliance (Singapore, Cyprus, Dubai) remain attractive for account opening.

The COREDO team assists clients in the account opening stage by providing financial monitoring and preparing all necessary documents for bank compliance procedures.

Compliance and Reporting for an Offshore Company

Reporting and regular auditing are becoming mandatory even for small entities. Offshore reporting automation is a key trend that can reduce costs and increase transparency.

COREDO’s practice has shown that implementing digital platforms for managing reporting and compliance allows clients not only to meet new requirements but also to scale their business without additional risks.

Risks and Sanctions in Offshore Business

Illustration for the section "Risks and Sanctions in Offshore Business" in the article "Offshore Jurisdictions 2025 – Concept, Regulation, Operation"
Risks and sanctions in offshore business today are becoming increasingly significant for companies working with foreign jurisdictions and complex financial schemes. International legislation is tightening, transparency requirements are growing, and violations can lead to financial losses and serious legal consequences. To understand how these threats are formed, it is important to delve into the concepts of **”black” and “gray” lists** and their role in assessing offshore activity risks.

Black and Gray Lists: What They Are and Why They Are Needed

Inclusion in offshore black and gray lists (EU Blacklist) leads to account blocking, loss of tax benefits, and restrictions on international transactions.
In 2025, the influence of international sanctions on offshore companies intensified: even indirect involvement in sanctioned schemes can lead to asset freezes and criminal prosecution.

COREDO’s solution: regular auditing of corporate structures, automated monitoring of changes in lists, and the integration of income legalization procedures through offshores within the framework of international standards.

Risks of Using Offshores for Business

Main risks, legal (non-compliance with substance and AML), tax (double taxation, loss of benefits), reputational (bank refusal, media negativity).

To minimize risks, the COREDO team implements a multi-level due diligence system, corporate governance considering business mobility, and the sustainability of offshore models to legal changes.

Offshore Jurisdictions: Trends and Alternatives

Illustration for the section "Offshore Jurisdictions: Trends and Alternatives" in the article "Offshore Jurisdictions 2025 – Concept, Regulation, Operation"
Offshore jurisdictions today face new trends: increased transparency requirements, stricter international standards, and shifting focus to legal and legitimate business schemes. These changes create a demand for alternatives to classic offshores and spark interest in modern regulatory arbitration strategies, where the balance between tax optimization and compliance with global rules is crucial.

Alternative to Offshores and Regulatory Arbitration

In 2025, hybrid models take the place of classic offshores: international corporate holdings, structures with tax incentives for foreign investors, use of regulatory arbitration between jurisdictions of the EU, Asia, and the Caribbean region.

At COREDO, we observe a growing interest in jurisdictions with transparent tax systems and flexible conditions for corporate structuring, allowing legal tax optimization and risk management.

Automation of Offshore Business

Automation of reporting and digitalization of compliance have become drivers of business scalability through offshore solutions.

COREDO implements digital platforms for clients, integrating KYC, financial monitoring, and corporate reporting, allowing the management of structures in different jurisdictions from single interface and ensuring corporate mobility.

Recommendations for Entrepreneurs and Managers

Checklist for choosing a jurisdiction:

  • Evaluate the requirements for substance and economic presence.
  • Check current standards for AML, KYC, and due diligence.
  • Ensure the availability of developed banking infrastructure.
  • Analyze the risks of being blacklisted and the consequences of sanctions.
  • Evaluate opportunities for reporting automation and corporate governance support.

How to Ensure Compliance with New Requirements:

  • Implement digital compliance procedures and regular audits.
  • Ensure transparency of ownership structure and beneficiary disclosure.
  • Use services of professional corporate service providers.

How to Minimize Risks and Increase ROI:

  • Regularly update the corporate structure considering legislation changes.
  • Invest in reporting and compliance automation.
  • Manage reputational risks through transparency and compliance with international standards.

Key Conclusions and Advice

The year 2025 brought radical changes in offshore jurisdiction regulation: increased transparency, substance, compliance, and financial reporting requirements. The main mistake of entrepreneurs is underestimating the new standards and attempting to use outdated schemes.

For legal and effective use of offshore structures, I recommend:

  • Choosing jurisdictions with a stable reputation and flexible conditions for real business.
  • Integrating automation and digitalization into compliance and corporate governance processes.
  • Regularly conducting due diligence and monitoring changes in international standards.
COREDO’s experience proves: only a comprehensive approach to registration, support, and management of offshore companies allows compliance with new requirements and using them as a competitive advantage in global business.
In 2025, as the European crypto market undergoes a period of stringent regulatory transformation under MiCA’s pressure, Panama remains one of the few offshore jurisdictions for crypto where entrepreneurs can launch projects with minimal bureaucratic hurdles. According to the latest research, over 60% of new crypto companies targeting international markets choose jurisdictions with flexible regulatory frameworks, and Panama consistently ranks among the top 5 destinations.

Why does this happen? Firstly, Panama’s cryptocurrency legislation does not mandate licensing for most activities involving virtual assets unless the company works directly with Panama residents. This allows businesses to launch without MiCA and without needing expensive and complex licenses like in the EU. Secondly, Company Registration offshore is entirely possible remotely, which is particularly relevant for international teams and digital nomads.

Practice by COREDO confirms: for clients focused on rapid scaling and cross-border payments, Panama becomes a real alternative to MiCA. For example, in 2024, the COREDO team completed a project to register a crypto company in Panama for a group of European investors who needed a flexible corporate structure and the ability to legalize income beyond the strict EU boundaries. This approach enabled the client to launch a business within 3 weeks, integrate KYC procedures, and establish an anti-money laundering (AML) policy based on international FATF standards.

# Cryptocurrency License and Licensing Features in Panama

Illustration for the section "# Cryptocurrency License and Licensing Features in Panama" in the article "Panama as an Alternative to MiCA"

Unlike the EU, where a crypto license for CASP (Crypto Asset Service Provider) has become a mandatory requirement, Panama offers no-license solutions for crypto businesses. This doesn’t mean there’s no control: companies are required to implement internal compliance control, follow AML and KYC protocols, and adhere to transparency requirements of corporate structures. Meanwhile, the cost of setting up a crypto company in Panama is significantly lower than in the EU, and the time to obtain a crypto license (if still required for certain activities) rarely exceeds 4–6 weeks.
A real case from COREDO’s practice: a client – a fintech company planning to launch a crypto wallet and token exchange for institutional clients in Asia and the EU. The solution developed by COREDO included registering a company in Panama, implementing AML and KYC policies with regard to international standards, and preparing documentation for subsequent bank account integration. The outcome: savings of over 70% on Licensing compared to similar projects in the EU and a fast market entry.

# Panama’s Tax System and Financial Infrastructure

Illustration for the section "# Panama

Panama applies a territorial taxation principle: income earned outside the country is not taxed. For crypto companies, this means opportunities for legal tax optimization and transparent transfer pricing.

Panama’s banking infrastructure is developing, although opening accounts for crypto businesses requires meticulous KYC dossiers and internal audits. Tax optimization strategies developed by the COREDO team allow for bank account integration in the EU or Asia using the Panamanian structure as a holding or operational company.

Actionable insights:

  • To successfully launch a crypto company in Panama, prepare an AML/KYC document package, choose an optimal corporate structure, and pre-agree on a banking account opening strategy.
  • Pay attention to the need for regular internal audits and reporting to maintain business transparency and minimize account blocking risks.

MiCA: Crypto Business Requirements

Illustration for the section "MiCA: Crypto Business Requirements" in the article "Panama as an Alternative to MiCA"

# Key Requirements and Provisions of MiCA for Crypto Companies

Illustration for the section "# Key Requirements and Provisions of MiCA for Crypto Companies" in the article "Panama as an Alternative to MiCA"

MiCA regulation (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation), which came into effect in 2024, became a key factor in the transformation of the crypto industry in the EU. Licensing CASP in the EU now requires not only strict AML and KYC compliance but also the implementation of comprehensive compliance control procedures, internal audits, and transparent virtual asset reporting.

For many fintech companies and startups, this means the need to revise business models, increase share capital, and implement new digital identification technologies. EU regulatory requirements are aimed at protecting investors’ interests but also significantly increase costs and timelines for launching a crypto project.

# Costs and Licensing Timelines Comparison in MiCA and Panama

Illustration for the section "# Costs and Licensing Timelines Comparison in MiCA and Panama" in the article "Panama as an Alternative to MiCA"

comparison of jurisdictions for crypto business shows: the cost of launching a crypto project in the EU might exceed €100,000 just at the licensing stage, and the timeline to obtain a crypto license for CASP ranges from 6 to 12 months. Meanwhile, registering a company in Panama is 5–10 times cheaper, and all stages (from document submission to banking account integration) take 3–6 weeks.
COREDO’s practice confirms: for clients, where speed to market and cost optimization is critical, Panama becomes a real alternative to MiCA. However, keep in mind: the absence of an EU license limits direct access to certain institutional investors and payment services within the EU.

# MiCA Risks and Limitations for International Scaling

MiCA introduces strict boundaries for international scalability of crypto companies, especially regarding cross-border payments and dealings with non-residents. Managing reputational risks, protecting investors’ interests, and complying with international FATF standards become key tasks for compliance departments.
A real case: one of COREDO’s clients, a European crypto startup that was forced to completely revise its corporate structure after MiCA’s implementation, to prevent losing access to Asian markets. The solution involved creating a holding company in Panama followed by a subsidiary licensing in the EU and Asia.

Actionable insights:

  • When choosing between MiCA and Panama, consider not just costs and timelines but also strategic goals: if access to EU institutional investors is essential, a CASP license is mandatory.
  • For flexible scaling and cost optimization – an offshore jurisdiction for crypto (Panama) might be a more effective solution.

Panama or EU (MiCA): Where to Open a Crypto Business?

# Comparison Table: Key Parameters of Panama and MiCA for Crypto Business

Criterion Panama EU (MiCA)
Crypto License Required No (General AML rules) Yes (CASP, strict procedure)
Launch Timelines 2–4 weeks 3–9 months
Registration Costs Low High
Tax Burden Territorial principle, benefits Transparent, higher
Share Capital Requirements Minimal Medium/High
Banking Infrastructure Limited but accessible Developed, but harder to open an account
Compliance and AML Voluntary/minimal Strict, mandatory
Reputational Risks Medium Minimal
Scalability Potential High (Flexibility) Limited by regulations

# Practical Cases of Entering EU and Asian Markets via Panama

In 2023–2025, the COREDO team facilitated several projects to open a crypto company in Panama for operations with the EU and Asia. One of the most illustrative cases was launching a platform for cross-border payments and virtual asset exchanges between European and Asian clients. Thanks to Panamanian jurisdiction, it was swift to integrate bank accounts in Singapore and the UK, as well as ensure compliance with international AML and KYC standards.
The client was able to conduct business without MiCA, maintaining corporate structure flexibility and minimizing regulatory risks. This approach was especially in demand among institutional clients in the crypto industry, where the speed of introducing new products and corporate structure transparency are crucial.

Actionable insights:

  • When choosing a jurisdiction for a crypto business, consider not only direct costs but also scalability possibilities, banking service integration, and reputational risk management.
  • Panama: an efficient tool for entering EU and Asian markets, especially with the proper integration of AML/KYC and internal control.

Compliance and AML for Crypto Business in the EU and Panama

# How to Ensure Compliance with International FATF Standards in Panama

Implementing new regulatory requirements and ensuring compliance with international FATF standards is a key challenge for crypto companies in any jurisdiction. Panama actively adapts its legal framework to align with global AML and KYC trends.

Best practices for AML for companies in Panama include implementing a risk-based approach, regular internal audits, automating KYC processes, and integrating digital identification technologies.

The COREDO team practically implemented projects to build a compliance system for crypto startups, where special attention was given to employee training, Due Diligence procedure implementation, and constant transaction monitoring. This approach not only meets FATF requirements but also minimizes the risk of account and asset blocking.

# Internal Control, Reporting, and Risk Management

For long-term sustainability of a crypto company in Panama, building a transparent system of internal control, reporting, and reputational risk management is critical. International standards require the implementation of compliance control, regular corporate structure reviews, and investor interest protection.
A real example from COREDO’s practice: initiating an internal audit for a crypto company focused on institutional clients allowed identifying and addressing potential violations before partnering with major banks in the EU.

Actionable insights:

  • Invest in the automation of KYC and AML processes to ensure long-term business sustainability and transparency.
  • Regularly update internal control policies in line with international requirements and trends.

Launching a Crypto Company in Panama

# Step-by-Step Guide to Registering a Crypto Company in Panama

  1. Prepare the corporate structure: define founder composition, share distribution, choose the optimal model (holding, operating company).
  2. Gather and prepare documents: articles of association, KYC dossier, AML policy, address confirmation, and identification of beneficiaries.
  3. Submit application and registration: fully remote company opening through accredited agents.
  4. Implement compliance procedures: develop and implement internal AML/KYC policies, staff training.
  5. Receive corporate documents: registry extract, registration certificate, corporate seal.
A COREDO project for a Slovak crypto startup demonstrated that with proper preparation, all stages can be completed in 2–4 weeks.

# How to Open a Bank Account and Integrate Payment Services

Panama’s banking infrastructure requires a special approach: opening an account for a crypto company requires an extensive KYC dossier, business plan, and proof of funds source. The COREDO-developed solution includes integrating accounts in international banks (EU, Asia) through a Panamanian structure, allowing for cross-border payments and minimizing blocking risks.

# Scaling the Business and Entering International Markets

Scaling crypto companies registered in Panama is possible due to the flexibility of the corporate structure, low tax burden, and the ability for quick international market entry. COREDO practice shows: for successful scaling, it’s vital to pre-design strategies for banking service integration, compliance with international standards, and reputational risk management.

Actionable insights:

  • Prepare an extensive KYC dossier and business plan for account opening.
  • Use the Panamanian structure for holding and operational tasks, integrating banking services in the EU and Asia.

Thus, competent planning of corporate and banking infrastructure forms a solid foundation for sustainable development of a crypto company in Panama and the minimization of operational risks: let’s further explore key risks and prospects of working with cryptocurrency in the jurisdiction.

Cryptocurrency in Panama: Risks and Prospects

# Potential Regulatory Changes and Their Impact on Business

In 2025–2027, further alignment of Panama’s legal framework with international FATF standards is expected along with new regulatory initiatives in the cryptocurrency sector. This can affect compliance requirements, reporting, and internal control. COREDO analytics show: companies that pre-implement best practices in AML/KYC adapt more easily to new requirements and minimize operational risks.

# Reputational and Operational Risks for Companies and Investors

Registering a crypto company in Panama is associated with certain reputational risks for European clients and institutional investors. To minimize them, it is important to ensure corporate structure transparency, regular internal audits, and compliance with international standards. A COREDO solution implemented for one of the clients included introducing a reputational risk management system and automating investor reporting.

Actionable insights:

  • Stay informed about legislative changes and adapt internal processes in advance.
  • Invest in systems for managing reputational and operational risks.

Conclusions and Recommendations for Business

  1. Goals and Strategy Analysis: Determine your priority – launch speed, cost optimization, or access to EU institutional investors.
  2. jurisdiction selection: if flexibility, speed, and tax benefits are critical: Panama as an alternative to MiCA will be the optimal choice; for working with large EU investors, a CASP license is mandatory.
  3. Document Preparation: Pre-prepare a full package of KYC/AML documents, business plan, and ownership structure.
  4. Compliance and Internal Control: Implement automated AML/KYC systems, conduct regular internal audits, and invest in team training.
  5. Scaling and Integration: Use the Panamanian structure for international scaling, integrate banking services in the EU and Asia.
  6. Risk Management: Monitor regulatory changes, ensure corporate structure transparency, and build trust with investors through regular reporting.
COREDO remains your reliable partner at every stage: from choosing a jurisdiction and registering a company to implementing compliance and scaling your business. Our experience and deep understanding of international trends enable us to develop solutions that not only meet current requirements but also ensure long-term sustainability and investment appeal of your crypto business.

In 2024, global markets were shocked by statistics: in the EU and Asia alone, fines for AML violations exceeded $7 billion, and the number of account blocks increased by 28% compared to the previous year. In Africa, regulators applied criminal liability to top management for the first time for failing to comply with international AML standards.

This trend reflects not just stricter controls: it signals a new reality where international business compliance becomes an integral element of survival and growth strategy.

Why do even experienced companies with a developed internal control system find themselves on the list of violators?

The answer lies in the complexity of regulatory requirements, the synchronization of EU, FATF directives, and national standards of Asia and Africa, as well as the rapid development of money laundering technologies. One unsuccessful onboarding of a high-risk client or a missed suspicious transaction: and the business risks not only fines but also corporate account blocks, license revocation, reputational losses, and sometimes criminal liability for top management.

In this article, I will analyze six of the most common mistakes for which international business receives AML fines and show how the COREDO team helps companies minimize these risks. If you want to understand how to avoid strategic missteps, build reliable corporate compliance, and ensure long-term business sustainability: I recommend reading to the end.

Here you will find not only expertise but also practical tools that really work.

AML: Common Mistakes and Business Fines

Illustration for the section "AML: Common Mistakes and Business Fines" in the article "6 Common AML Violations That International Business Is Fined For"
AML: common mistakes and business fines are not only legal nuances but also real financial and reputational risks for companies of any scale.

Even formal or untimely errors in executing KYC and CDD identification details can lead to large fines, account blocks, and license suspensions.

Let’s look at common violations and examples of how businesses encounter problems even at the client acquaintance stage.

KYC and CDD Identification Errors

Illustration for the section "KYC and CDD Identification Errors" in the article "6 Common AML Violations That International Business Is Fined For"
In 2025, EU and Asia regulators note that up to 40% of all fines for AML violations are related to insufficient KYC and CDD.

Typical mistakes include superficial identification, lack of Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) for high-risk clients, ignoring sanctioned jurisdictions, and a formal approach to a risk-based approach.

COREDO’s practice has seen cases where a company, working with clients from several countries, used outdated KYC checklists and did not track updates to sanction lists. As a result: account blocks and a fine of 2% of annual turnover.

Special attention should be paid to automating AML processes: manual data processing no longer meets regulator requirements.

Solutions developed at COREDO allow the integration of modern KYC platforms with automatic updates of client data and sanction lists, minimizing the risk of errors and speeding up onboarding.

Monitoring and Reporting on Suspicious Transactions

Transaction monitoring is a key element in combating money laundering, but it is here that strategic AML compliance mistakes most often manifest.

Insufficient depth of analysis, lack of scenarios for identifying complex schemes, untimely submission of suspicious activity reports (SAR) – all this leads to fines and corporate account blocks.

In one COREDO case, an international payment company faced a license suspension due to a delay in submitting a SAR for a suspicious transaction amounting to $500,000. Only prompt interaction with the regulator and the implementation of an AI-based automated monitoring system allowed operations to resume and criminal liability to be avoided.

Today regulators require not only AML reporting but also transparency of monitoring algorithms.

COREDO practice confirms: Integrating AML systems with machine learning capabilities allows for real-time anomaly detection and reporting that meets FATF standards and EU AML directives.

Errors in Working with High-Risk Clients

Working with high-risk clients and jurisdictions is an area of increased attention for regulators in the EU, Asia, and Africa. The main AML mistakes here are a formal approach to EDD, lack of documented risk assessment, and insufficient transparency of ownership structure.

In one COREDO project, a client from the EU was fined for inadequately justified onboarding of a client from a sanctioned jurisdiction: documents confirming the source of funds were not collected, and independent Due Diligence was not conducted.

The recommendation based on COREDO’s experience is to implement a multi-level verification process, including automated beneficiary checks, regular business process audits, and mandatory risk assessment for all new high-risk region clients.

This not only reduces the likelihood of fines but also protects the business from service refusal by international banks.

Thus, insufficient attention to details in AML procedures can lead to serious consequences and highlights the importance of strengthening corporate compliance.

Gaps in Corporate Compliance

Even the most sophisticated AML system will not save a business if the company lacks a mature compliance culture.

In COREDO practice, there have been situations where the formal presence of a compliance officer and internal regulations was not accompanied by actual employee training and top management involvement. As a result, strategic AML compliance mistakes, ineffective risk management, and fines for non-compliance with procedures occurred.

Developing a compliance culture requires a systematic approach: regular employee training, strategic compliance implementation, staff motivation to adhere to standards, and constant communication between departments.

Solutions implemented by the COREDO team include the development of interactive training programs and KPIs to assess AML compliance maturity.

Data Storage Violations for AML

EU and Asia regulators have tightened data storage and documentation requirements for AML: companies must not only collect but also ensure business structure transparency, synchronize with international regulators, and be ready for sudden audits. In one COREDO case, a client faced account blocks due to untimely documentation submission for transactions from the previous three years.

An audit of business processes conducted by our team identified gaps in internal control and allowed for the establishment of a data storage system meeting international AML standards.

Advice from COREDO: automate documentation processes, implement internal control systems, and regularly audit business processes for AML compliance.

This minimizes the risk of fines and simplifies interaction with regulators.

New Regulatory Requirements in the EU and Asia

2025 is marked by major changes in international AML standards: new EU directives have come into force, FATF recommendations have been updated, and corporate responsibility requirements in Asia and Africa have been tightened.

The main mistake is untimely updating of internal procedures and lack of synchronization with international regulators.

In COREDO practice, there have been cases where a company from the EU received a large fine for non-compliance with new transaction monitoring automation requirements effective January 2025.

The solution developed at COREDO: continuous monitoring of legislative changes, integration of new requirements into business processes, staff training, and regular interaction with regulators.

Only such an approach ensures the sustainability of international business and avoids fines for non-compliance with AML in the EU, Asia, and Africa.

Thus, insufficient flexibility in adapting AML procedures is fraught with not only financial but also reputational risks for international business: next, let’s examine specific cases of fines and their consequences.

AML Fines: Cases and Consequences

Illustration for the section "AML Fines: Cases and Consequences" in the article "6 Common AML Violations That International Business Is Fined For"
AML fines: these are not only financial losses but also account blocks, license suspensions, criminal liability, and long-term reputational risks.

Over the past two years, the COREDO team has analyzed cases where companies lost up to 30% of their client base due to banks refusing to serve them after public announcement of the fine.

Major Fines and Violations 2024–2025

Jurisdiction Fine Amount Violation Consequences for Business
EU $150 million Insufficient KYC, SAR Account blocks, license loss
Asia $95 million Ineffective monitoring Reputational losses, criminal liability
Africa $40 million Work with high-risk clients Bank refusal, license revocation
In one COREDO case, a client from the EU, after receiving a fine for KYC violations, faced account blocks in three international banks and the loss of key partnership contracts. In Asia, a large payment company was forced to suspend operations for 4 months due to an investigation into ineffective transaction monitoring and delayed SAR submission. In Africa, license revocation after working with high-risk clients led to a complete business restructuring and jurisdiction change.

How to Avoid AML Fines in Business

Illustration for the section "How to Avoid AML Fines in Business" in the article "6 Common AML Violations That International Business Is Fined For"
Avoiding AML fines in business is becoming increasingly challenging: regulators tighten control, and penalties for violations reach millions and include account blocks and license revocations. To avoid being hit, it is important not only to formally comply with requirements but also to implement real, effective procedures focusing on automation and a risk-based approach.

Automation and Risk-Based Approach in AML

Effective implementation of a risk-based approach is key to reducing errors in client onboarding and transaction monitoring. COREDO’s experience shows that automating AML processes using AI and machine learning not only speeds up data processing but also improves the accuracy of detecting suspicious transactions.

In one case, the implementation of an integrated AML system reduced incident investigation time by 60% and the number of false positives.

Recommendation: assess the ROI from new technologies, integrate AML systems with internal platforms, and regularly update monitoring scenarios according to current risks.

Compliance Training for Personnel

Compliance culture begins with training: regular AML regulatory training, interactive courses for distributed teams, and involving compliance officers in strategic planning.

In one COREDO project, implementing an AML compliance maturity assessment system reduced due diligence client errors by 35% and increased employee engagement.

Advice: build a motivation system for staff, implement compliance maturity metrics, and ensure constant communication between departments.

Choosing an AML Provider and Working with Regulators

Choosing an AML audit and legal support provider is a strategic decision for international business. COREDO’s practice confirms: only comprehensive AML support, including client due diligence, business process auditing, synchronization with international regulators, and business structure transparency, allows minimizing fine risks and simplifies interactions with supervisory bodies.

Recommendation: build long-term relationships with the provider, regularly update internal procedures, and prepare the company for sudden AML audits.

Key Recommendations for Entrepreneurs

Illustration for the section "Key Recommendations for Entrepreneurs" in the article "6 Common AML Violations That International Business Is Fined For"
Key recommendations for entrepreneurs will not only increase business efficiency but also minimize legal and financial risks.

Particular attention in 2025 should be paid to compliance with currency and anti-money laundering (AML) legislation: even the slightest mistakes can lead to large fines and company operation restrictions.

Below are the main steps to help avoid problems and protect your business.

How to Avoid AML Fines

  • Regularly update KYC and CDD procedures, use automated solutions for client checks, and sanction list monitoring.
  • Implement a multi-level risk-based approach for high-risk clients and jurisdictions.
  • Integrate AML systems with AI and machine learning capabilities for transaction monitoring and reporting.
  • Create a compliance culture through staff training, motivation, and top management involvement.
  • Ensure business structure transparency and preparedness for sudden AML audits.
  • Synchronize internal procedures with current FATF, EU directives, and national regulator requirements.

Practical Tips

  • In case of a sudden AML audit: promptly collect and provide all documents on KYC, CDD, SAR, and internal control. Appoint a responsible person for regulator communication.
  • Prepare documents: store all client and transaction data digitally, ensure backup, and quick archive access.
  • Respond to regulator requests: act transparently, provide complete information, and document all interaction stages.
Effective management of these processes creates a foundation for successfully implementing AML compliance strategy in 2025.

AML Compliance Strategy for Business 2025

Strategic compliance is not just about adhering to formal requirements but integrating AML procedures into the company’s DNA.

COREDO’s experience shows: only a systematic approach, including automation, training, auditing, and transparency, minimizes reputational and financial risks, ensures long-term sustainability and business investment appeal. In the context of tightening regulatory requirements in the EU, Asia, and Africa, comprehensive AML support is becoming not an option but a strategic necessity for any international enterprise.

“90% of new financial companies in Europe choose jurisdictions with the most transparent regulation, and only 7% of them successfully pass Licensing on their first attempt.” These figures don’t just surprise: they highlight how complex and competitive the international financial services environment is today.

In recent years, Malta has transformed into one of the most sought-after financial hubs in the EU: banks, investment funds, fintech and blockchain companies, insurance, and trust structures are being established here. But behind the attractive opportunities lie challenges: the Malta Financial Services Authority’s (MFSA) licensing, compliance, and corporate governance requirements are among the strictest in Europe.

How to navigate the path from registering a legal entity to obtaining an MFSA license, build a reliable AML system, implement best corporate governance practices, and avoid common mistakes? Why has the Maltese financial regulator become a benchmark of transparency and innovation for the entire EU?

In this article, I, Nikita Veremeev, founder of COREDO, share practical strategies and my team’s experience working with the MFSA – from company registration to supporting complex licenses and implementing RegTech solutions. If you are considering Malta as an entry point to the European financial services market, I recommend reading to the end: here you will find not only a deep analysis of the requirements but also answers to key questions that international entrepreneurs and executives face.

Powers of MFSA in Malta

Illustration for the section "Powers of MFSA in Malta" in the article "Malta Financial Services Authority - overview of the Maltese regulator"
Powers of MFSA in Malta cover the regulation and supervision of all sectors of the country’s financial market – from banks and investment companies to insurance organizations and new fintech players. The MFSA does not just perform the functions of a regulator but also strives to ensure consumer protection and market transparency, actively contributing to the development and improvement of the financial industry.

Functions and tasks of MFSA

Malta Financial Services Authority is the sole integrated regulator of the country’s financial sector, responsible for licensing, supervision, and development of all market segments: banks, investment companies, insurance organizations, pension schemes, management companies, and providers of virtual financial assets (VFA).

The MFSA ensures:
– *Financial supervision* of market participants’ activities, including monitoring corporate governance, risk management, and compliance with EU financial legislation.
– *Protection of investors and consumers*: implementation of compensation mechanisms, investigation of complaints, control over information disclosure.
– *Support of transparency and stability*: regular checks, mandatory financial reporting, implementation of corporate governance standards.

COREDO’s practice confirms: the MFSA’s systematic approach to compliance and corporate governance allows Malta to maintain its status as one of the most resilient financial hubs in the EU.

Collaboration of MFSA with other countries

The MFSA is actively integrated into the European and global financial regulation system. The regulator participates in working groups of the European Banking Authority (EBA), the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), and the International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO).

As part of harmonizing EU standards and implementing FATF standards, the MFSA ensures experience exchange, joint investigations, and the implementation of best practices for combating money laundering and preventing fraud. This level of cooperation is critical for companies providing cross-border financial services and planning to scale in Europe.

MFSA Requirements for Financial Companies in Malta

Illustration for the section "Requirements of MFSA for financial companies in Malta" in the article "Malta Financial Services Authority - overview of the Maltese regulator"
MFSA Requirements for Financial Companies in Malta represent a strictly regimented set of conditions that must be met to start and conduct financial activities on the island. The MFSA places special emphasis on transparency, company stability, and compliance with international standards, which is reflected in the list of requirements for obtaining a license and continuing operations.

MFSA License for Companies in Malta

obtaining a license MFSA: a multi-stage process requiring a deep understanding of local and European regulations. The COREDO team has implemented dozens of projects for licensing banks, investment companies, payment institutions, VFA providers, and insurance intermediaries.

Key stages include:
– Defining the optimal corporate structure (e.g., Private Limited Company, ICC, PCC) considering requirements for transparency of beneficiaries and risk management.
– Preparation of document package: business plan, AML/KYC policy, internal Due Diligence procedures, description of IT infrastructure, financial model.
– Checking compliance with minimum requirements for capital, experience, and reputation of directors (fit and proper test).
– Submitting an application to the MFSA, undergoing interviews and inspections, and liaising with the Malta Business Registry (MBR).
– Obtaining the license and integration into the financial monitoring system.

The solution developed by COREDO for international holdings includes remote account opening, compliance procedure automation, and support at all stages of interaction with the regulator.

Regulation of Banks, Investment Companies, and Insurers

Regulation of banking activities in Malta is built on principles of stability, transparency, and integration with European standards. The MFSA imposes specific requirements on reserves, internal controls, risk management procedures, and banks’ corporate structures.

Separate licenses apply to investment companies and funds: Collective Investment Schemes, Alternative Investment Funds, Professional Investor Funds. Supervision of insurance companies and pension schemes includes control over solvency, information disclosure, and client rights protection.

COREDO’s experience has shown that adapting internal policies to MFSA requirements during document preparation significantly accelerates the licensing process and reduces the risk of rejection.

Registering a Company in Malta through MBR

step-by-step registration guide:
– Reserving a unique name through MBR.
– Preparing the charter, appointing directors and a secretary, and determining the legal address.
– Depositing the authorized capital into an account in a Maltese bank.
– Submission of the document package to MBR, receiving a registration number and an excerpt.

Special identification and Due Diligence procedures are provided for non-residents and international holdings, including confirmation of the source of funds and compliance with AML standards.

AML Compliance: MFSA Standards

Illustration for the section "AML Compliance: MFSA standards" in the article "Malta Financial Services Authority - overview of the Maltese regulator"
AML Compliance: MFSA standards are a system of regulatory requirements aimed at enhancing transparency and security in the financial services sector. For fintech companies, compliance with AML and KYC standards of the MFSA becomes a decisive condition not only for legal operations but also for strengthening trust with clients and regulators.

MFSA Requirements for AML and KYC for Fintech Companies

The MFSA implements some of the strictest AML compliance requirements in the EU. Financial and fintech companies must develop and implement comprehensive KYC procedures, conduct regular Due Diligence of clients, monitor transactions, and identify suspicious operations.

In COREDO’s cases on licensing cryptocurrency and payment companies in Malta, we built multi-level control systems, integrating automated RegTech solutions for checking clients against international sanction lists and PEP screening.

MFSA’s Control over AML Compliance

MFSA conducts regular and unscheduled checks, analyzes companies’ internal policies and reporting, and holds interviews with compliance officers. The audit includes an assessment of the effectiveness of KYC procedures, transaction monitoring, staff training, and incident management.

Significant penalties are provided for violations: from fines to license revocation and criminal liability. COREDO’s practice shows that implementing automated monitoring systems and regularly updating internal policies can minimize risks and successfully pass MFSA inspections.

Thus, proper adherence to MFSA requirements becomes a key factor for market participants, especially in the rapidly developing fintech and cryptocurrency sectors.

Regulation of Fintech and Cryptocurrencies

Illustration for the section "Regulation of Fintech and Cryptocurrencies" in the article "Malta Financial Services Authority - overview of the Maltese regulator"
Regulation of Fintech and Cryptocurrencies is becoming an increasingly significant factor for the development of innovative financial services and digital assets. The emergence of new technologies requires finding a balance between supporting innovations and the necessity to minimize risks for the market and consumers. In modern conditions, key issues include the principles of VFA regulation and the specifics of running a crypto business.

Regulation of VFA and Crypto Business

Malta: one of the first countries in the world to introduce a separate regulation regime for virtual financial assets (VFA). The VFA Act and corresponding MFSA rules cover the licensing of cryptocurrency wallet providers, exchanges, ICO/IEO platforms, and other blockchain projects.

The MFSA imposes requirements for transparency of the corporate structure, having a local office, internal control, and the implementation of AML/KYC procedures in line with FATF standards. Prospects for VFA regulation in Malta include further integration with European MiCA initiatives and strengthening investor protection.

RegTech and Digital Compliance

The MFSA actively implements RegTech solutions, allowing for the automation of data collection, analysis, and storage for compliance, transaction monitoring, and report preparation. In several cases, the COREDO team implemented digital KYC platforms for clients, enabling remote client identification and reducing operational costs.

The MFSA supports the digitalization of compliance, encourages the implementation of artificial intelligence for risk analysis, and automation of Due Diligence, which significantly speeds up processes and enhances transparency.

Structures ICC, PCC, RICC, and Securitization

Illustration for the section "Structures ICC, PCC, RICC, and Securitization" in the article "Malta Financial Services Authority - overview of the Maltese regulator"
Structures ICC, PCC, RICC, and Securitization are at the heart of modern financial and legal solutions, providing flexibility and protection of business interests. These tools enable the organization of specialized companies and the implementation of innovative services in practice.

Services of Specialized Companies: Where They Are Applied

Malta offers unique corporate structures: Incorporated Cell Companies (ICC), Protected Cell Companies (PCC), Recognised Incorporated Cell Companies (RICC), and Securitisation Cell Companies. These forms are used to create investment funds, insurance platforms, securitization structures, and trust management of assets.

Advantages:
– Separation of assets and liabilities between cells, which reduces risks for investors.
– Flexibility of corporate governance and the ability to scale without creating separate legal entities.
– Application for collective investment schemes, insurance intermediaries, M&A in the financial sector.

Legal and Compliance Risks in Creating Structures

The creation of ICC, PCC, or RICC requires special permission from the MFSA, the development of internal risk management and compliance policies, and adherence to information disclosure and financial reporting requirements. COREDO’s practice has shown that proper corporate structure setup and transparent interaction with the regulator can optimize taxation and protect investor interests.

Transparency and Investor Protection by MFSA

Transparency and investor protection: core priorities of the MFSA aimed at maintaining trust in Malta’s financial market and minimizing risks for depositors. MFSA’s supervisory and regulatory mechanisms ensure that companies adhere to strict reporting standards and disclose all necessary information to investors promptly.

Next, we will explore how transparency and reporting requirements are implemented for companies under MFSA supervision.

Transparency and Reporting of MFSA Companies

The MFSA requires all licensed companies to regularly submit financial reports, conduct external audits, and disclose information about beneficiaries and the corporate structure. Electronic platforms and automated data analysis systems are used for control.

In several COREDO projects, clients have successfully integrated solutions for automating report preparation, reducing error probabilities, and speeding up the regulator agreement process.

Investor and Consumer Protection

The MFSA implements best practices for corporate governance, including mandatory independent directors, audit and compliance committees, internal control, and decision-making transparency. Compensation schemes, dispute resolution mechanisms, and risk minimization tools are in place for investor protection.

Interaction of MFSA with Foreign Regulators

The interaction of the MFSA with foreign regulators plays a crucial role in ensuring transparency and effective oversight in the international financial market. To achieve this, the MFSA actively develops cooperation with foreign supervisory bodies, implements common standards, and participates in cross-border regulatory initiatives.

The Role of MFSA in International Standards

The Maltese financial regulator actively participates in the development and implementation of international standards in collaboration with EBA, ESMA, IOSCO, and FATF. MFSA collaborates with regulators from other countries for data exchange and investigations, which is especially vital for companies offering cross-border financial services.

Special legislative initiatives by the MFSA aim to harmonize Maltese regulation with European directives, and implement new standards for AML and investor protection.

This interaction ensures a high level of trust in the country’s financial sector and creates favorable conditions for investment activity within the Maltese jurisdiction.

Impact of MFSA on Investments in Malta

The MFSA shapes the country’s investment climate through transparent rules, regulatory predictability, and innovation support. An MFSA license opens access to EU markets, enhances partner and investor trust, and reduces barriers to business scaling.

Business Recommendations: What You Need to Know

In modern entrepreneurial conditions, acting randomly is increasingly risky. Business Recommendations: What You Need to Know will help you not only avoid typical mistakes but also build a development strategy considering current market trends and the specifics of your segment. The following algorithm will guide you on what to pay particular attention to at each stage.

Business Action Algorithm

  1. Evaluate strategic goals and choose the optimal corporate structure (PCC, ICC, standard company).
  2. Prepare a business plan, AML/KYC policy, internal regulations, and financial model.
  3. Conduct preliminary Due Diligence and gather a document package for submission to MFSA and MBR.
  4. Implement RegTech solutions for compliance automation and report preparation.
  5. Complete licensing, set up internal control, and train personnel.
  6. Regularly update internal policies considering new MFSA requirements and European standards.

Main Risks and Mistakes in Working with MFSA

– Underestimating the requirements for transparency of structure and capital sources.
– Lack of automated AML/KYC procedures and transaction monitoring.
– Inadequate preparation for MFSA interviews and inspections.
– Ignoring updates to EU legislation and special regulatory initiatives.

COREDO’s practice confirms: early involvement of experts and implementation of digital solutions significantly reduces risks and speeds up the entry to the EU market.

How to Choose a Business Partner in Malta

Key criteria: experience working with the MFSA, licensing and compliance expertise, understanding of international structures’ specifics, access to RegTech solutions, and support at all stages, from registration to auditing and reporting.

MFSA and Regulation of Financial Services in Malta

What strategic advantages does an MFSA license provide for entering the EU market?
An MFSA license is recognized in all EU countries, provides access to European financial markets, increases investor and partner trust, and reduces barriers to business scaling.

What types of licenses does the MFSA issue?
The MFSA licenses banks, investment companies and funds, insurance organizations, VFA providers, payment institutions, trust, and fiduciary companies.

What are the requirements for corporate structure?
Transparency of beneficiaries, a resident director, corporate secretary, internal control, and compliance, as well as meeting minimum capital requirements are required.

How does the MFSA ensure investor protection?
Implements compensation schemes, mandatory information disclosure, corporate governance control, and dispute resolution mechanisms.

Comparison of MFSA and European Regulatory Bodies’ Requirements

Criterion MFSA (Malta) FCA (United Kingdom) CySEC (Cyprus)
Minimum Capital €730,000 (bank) £5 million (bank) €730,000 (bank)
AML/KYC Requirements FATF standards, local procedures, regular audit FATF standards, reporting, inspections FATF standards, regular audit
License Acquisition Time 6–12 months 12–18 months 6–12 months
Support Costs Moderate High Moderate
Interaction with the EU Direct Passporting No Direct Passporting
Reputation and Status High, innovative hub High, global center Moderate, mass market

If you are considering Malta as a strategic entry point to the EU market, COREDO’s experience and deep understanding of working with the MFSA will not only help you through all stages of licensing but also build a sustainable, transparent, and competitive business model in one of Europe’s most dynamic financial hubs.

In 2025, the cost of choosing the wrong jurisdiction for an IT company may not only be measured in millions of euros but also in lost scaling opportunities, account blockages, or the inability to attract investments. According to Gartner data, more than 60% of international IT companies have faced payment blocks or banking service refusals due to non-compliance with new compliance and AML requirements. Even more alarming is the statistics on tax burdens: in 2024, the average effective tax rate increase for IT businesses in “unsuitable” jurisdictions amounted to 18% due to the tightening of global information exchange rules (CRS), substance requirements, and CFC.

Why do some IT companies attract venture capital and go public, while others are forced to change their country of registration, losing benefits and reputation? How to choose a country for registering an IT company in 2025 so that the business not only meets international standards but is also prepared for future challenges: from ESG to cryptocurrency regulation?

In this article, I, Nikita Veremeev, founder of COREDO, share a practical guide based on the experience of the COREDO team in registering and supporting IT companies in Europe, Asia, and Africa. Here you will find not only a comparative analysis of jurisdictions but also strategic advice that will help avoid key mistakes and ensure long-term sustainability for your business. Read the article to the end, and you will gain not just theory, but working tools for decision-making.

How to Choose a Jurisdiction for an IT Company

Illustration for the "How to Choose a Jurisdiction for an IT Company" section in the article "How to Choose a Jurisdiction for Registering an IT Company in 2025"
choosing a jurisdiction for a business is a strategic step that affects the tax burden, market access, investment attractiveness, and even the cost of company ownership. COREDO’s practice confirms: there are no universal solutions, but there are clear criteria that allow selecting the optimal country for registering an IT company abroad.

Tax Benefits for IT Companies
In 2025, tax optimization for IT companies goes beyond simply comparing rates. Key significance is given to tax benefits for IT companies (such as incentives for R&D, IP Box regimes), specific tax residency requirements for IT businesses, and double taxation avoidance agreements. It’s important to consider transfer pricing, CFC, and substance requirements, with real presence demands becoming stricter in the EU, the UK, and Singapore.

  • The COREDO team has implemented projects where smart structuring accounting for international financial reporting standards (IFRS) and jurisdictional investment attractiveness allowed clients to reduce their tax burden by 20-30% without losing benefits when changing the country of registration.

Compliance and AML for IT Business 2025
Modern IT businesses face growing compliance and AML requirements. Automatic CRS information exchange, KYC/AML procedures, FATF recommendations, and new AML standards demand not only transparency but continuous monitoring. A solution developed at COREDO allows the integration of compliance procedures into the corporate structure, minimizing compliance risks and ensuring adherence to banking and investor requirements in different countries.

Licensing and Regulation of IT, Fintech, Cryptocurrencies
For fintech and crypto companies, Licensing becomes a key factor. In 2025, the best countries for registering a fintech startup offer not only fintech licensing but also access to regulatory sandboxes, simplifying the launch of new products. The COREDO team has supported licensing for cryptocurrency and payment companies in Lithuania, Singapore, Estonia, and UAE, considering legal opinion nuances, capital requirements, and startup visas.

Corporate Structure and Reporting
The corporate structure for international IT projects must be not only flexible but also compliant with corporate reporting, reporting automation, and IFRS standards. It’s important to assess capital requirements, corporate reporting automation capabilities, and the availability of corporate secretarial services. COREDO’s experience shows: efficient corporate governance can reduce service costs and increase investor transparency.

Intellectual Property and GDPR: How to Protect?
Choosing a jurisdiction for an IT company directly affects intellectual property protection, trademark registration, and GDPR compliance. International shareholder rights protection, trademark registration, and data protection become critical for SaaS companies working with clients from the EU and the US. COREDO’s practice confirms: countries with strong IP protection systems and transparent data regulations ensure long-term sustainability and attractiveness for investors.

Best Jurisdictions for IT Companies

Illustration for the "Best Jurisdictions for IT Companies" section in the article "How to Choose a Jurisdiction for Registering an IT Company in 2025"
In 2025, registering a company in Europe, Asia, or Africa requires deep analysis not only of tax rates but also of substance requirements, banking infrastructure, investment attractiveness, and the reputation of the jurisdiction for IT companies. Below is an overview of key areas that the COREDO team works with in practice.

Cyprus, Estonia, Lithuania, Poland, Gibraltar: What to Choose?

  • Cyprus – a classic choice for IT companies thanks to its 12.5% corporate tax rate, fintech licensing, and strong banking infrastructure. An important detail: since 2024, substance requirements have been tightened, requiring actual presence and staff on the island.
  • Estonia – a leader in corporate reporting automation and a unique taxation system: 0% on undistributed profits. For IT businesses, this means the ability to reinvest income without immediate tax payments. Registering an IT company in Estonia is especially popular among SaaS and startups targeting the EU.
  • Lithuania and Poland – attractive for fintech and crypto companies due to transparent regulation, startup visas, and R&D support. COREDO’s experience shows that obtaining a payment or crypto license in Lithuania is possible in an average of 4-6 months.
  • Gibraltar, known as a “crypto jurisdiction,” but requires thorough Due Diligence and readiness for high compliance demands.

Singapore, Hong Kong, UAE, Turkey: Comparison

  • Singapore, one of the world leaders in fintech licensing and banking infrastructure. Minimal authorized capital, just 1 USD, but substance requirements and local director demands are quite strict. Regulatory sandboxes for fintech startups are actively developed in Singapore, and opening a bank account is possible only with full transparency of structure and business processes.
  • Hong Kong: retains the status of an international financial center. However, since 2024, AML/KYC requirements and CRS automatic exchange information have tightened. For IT companies working with cryptocurrencies, licensing and data protection nuances are relevant.
  • UAE: attractive low corporate tax rate (9%), registration possibilities in free economic zones, and a developed banking infrastructure. Here it’s important to consider high substance requirements and specifics of cryptocurrency regulation.
  • Turkey, becoming increasingly popular for IT companies due to flexible conditions for startups and growing innovation support.

Offshores in Africa: Seychelles, Belize, Panama

Seychelles, Belize, and Panama, traditional offshore jurisdictions for IT, attract with low registration costs and no profit tax. However, since 2025, substance requirements have increased, and compliance risks associated with CRS automatic information exchange require special attention. COREDO’s experience shows: for long-term projects and working with investors, offshore jurisdictions lag behind onshore ones in investment attractiveness and access to banking infrastructure.

Jurisdiction Table for IT Companies 2025

Jurisdiction Corporate Tax Substance Requirements AML/KYC Fintech Licenses GDPR Registration Cost Banking Infrastructure
Cyprus 12.5% Medium High Yes Yes Average Strong
Singapore 17% High High Yes No High Strong
Estonia 0% (reinvest) Medium High Yes Yes Low Medium
UAE 9% High Medium Yes No High Strong
Seychelles 0% Low Medium No No Low Weak

Registration and Support of IT Companies Abroad

Illustration for the "Registration and Support of IT Companies Abroad" section in the article "How to Choose a Jurisdiction for Registering an IT Company in 2025"
Registering an IT company abroad: it’s not just about choosing the country, but also a set of procedures: from opening a bank account to setting up compliance and corporate governance. COREDO’s practice shows: success depends on a systematic approach and professional support at all stages.

Open an Account in an International Bank
In 2025, opening a bank account abroad requires not only full KYC/AML compliance but also having substance: a real office, employees, and a transparent structure. This is especially relevant for opening an account for an IT company in the EU, where banks conduct deep due diligence and ask for proof of business activity. Solutions developed at COREDO allow speeding up the process by preparing a full package of documents and preliminary agreements with banks.

Legal business support
International legal support: key to minimizing risks and optimizing costs. Corporate secretarial services, reporting automation, preparation of legal opinions, and setup corporate governance allows IT companies to focus on development, not bureaucracy. COREDO’s experience has shown: timely implementation of compliance procedures reduces the probability of account blockage and fines by 3-5 times.

Changing Jurisdiction: Risks and Consequences
Exit strategies and changing the country of registration require thorough preparation. It’s important to consider the risks of losing preferential taxation, automatic information exchange, and potential consequences for cross-border M&A. COREDO’s practice confirms: only a comprehensive analysis of long-term consequences allows maintaining investment attractiveness and minimizing costs when changing jurisdictions.

Choosing a Jurisdiction for an IT Company in 2025

Illustration for the "Choosing a Jurisdiction for an IT Company in 2025" section in the article "How to Choose a Jurisdiction for Registering an IT Company in 2025"
Choosing a jurisdiction for an IT company in 2025 becomes one of the key strategic tasks for technology businesses. In the context of globalization and rapid ICT sector development, the right country registration directly affects growth opportunities, international collaboration, and access to funding.

How to Choose a Country for Registering an IT Company

  1. Conduct due diligence for each jurisdiction: assess tax burden, substance requirements, and the country’s reputation.
  2. Check for fintech licenses, AML/KYC requirements, and the possibility of opening a bank account.
  3. Compare registration costs, corporate reporting requirements, and banking infrastructure availability.
  4. Evaluate intellectual property protection, GDPR compliance, and R&D support programs.
  5. Engage an expert for preparing legal opinions and assessing long-term risks of jurisdiction change.

Common Mistakes When Choosing a Jurisdiction for IT Business

  1. Ignoring substance requirements and real presence demands.
  2. Underestimating compliance risks and CRS automatic information exchange.
  3. Choosing a country without considering long-term tax and investment access consequences.
  4. Errors in the structure of corporate governance and reporting.
  5. Lack of an exit strategy and assessment of risks of losing benefits when changing jurisdiction.

Registering IT Companies Abroad: Trends 2025–2027

International registration of an IT company in 2025: it’s not just a legal formality, but a strategic tool for growth, protection, and business scaling. Global trends, tightening cryptocurrency regulations, ESG factor implementation, corporate reporting automation, and rising compliance demands: require flexibility and readiness for changes.
COREDO’s experience shows: successful companies are those that invest in due diligence, build transparent corporate structures, and prepare exit strategies in advance. The best countries for IT business 2025 are not only “low taxes” but also sustainable jurisdictions with developed banking infrastructure, innovation support, and high data protection levels.

If your goal is long-term success in the international market, choose your jurisdiction consciously, based on deep analysis and professional support. The COREDO team is always ready to be your partner on this path, offering solutions proven by practice and adapted to future challenges.

In 2024, the number of incidents related to confidential information leakage in international companies increased by 37% compared to the previous year (data from IBM, Forrester, Gartner). Every second business faced unauthorized distribution of trade secrets or intellectual property, leading to losses in millions of euros and dollars. In the era of digitalization, remote work, and cross-border operations, the issue of protecting confidential information has become not just a legal formality but a strategic priority for any business operating in the EU, Asia, and Africa.
How often have you considered that your next partner, employee, or contractor could become a source of a critical leak? Why can even a perfect business process be destroyed by one incorrectly drafted non-disclosure agreement? Are you prepared for your NDA to truly protect rather than create an illusion of security?
In this article, I will detail how to correctly draft an NDA for international business on your own in 2025, what key points and legal nuances to consider to protect trade secrets, intellectual property, and personal data. If you want to get not just an NDA template but a strategic risk management tool and competitive advantage, I recommend reading to the end – you will receive a practical guide with a checklist, cases, and recommendations based on the experience of COREDO in the most challenging jurisdictions.

Types of NDA: Unilateral, Bilateral, Multilateral

NDA (Non-Disclosure Agreement): this is a legal tool that formalizes obligations to protect confidential information between parties. In COREDO’s practice, there are three main types of NDA:
  • Unilateral NDA: applied when only one party (the disclosing party) provides confidential information, and the other (the receiving party) is obligated not to disclose it. Most often used in hiring employees or working with contractors.
  • Bilateral NDA: both parties exchange confidential information and are obligated to keep it secret. This format is relevant for negotiations between companies, joint developments, M&A deals.
  • Multilateral NDA: includes three or more participants, each of whom can be either a disclosing or receiving party. This solution is often used in large projects, international consortia, and technology startups.
In each case, an NDA must clearly define the parties, the scope and nature of the protected information, as well as the liability for breach of obligations.

NDA to Protect Trade Secrets and Data

COREDO’s experience shows that an NDA is a key element of the system to protect trade secrets, intellectual property, and personal data. In conditions where business works with innovations, R&D, unique technologies, or big data, the risks of leaks multiply significantly. A well-drafted non-disclosure agreement allows you to:
  • Protect intellectual property (patents, know-how, source code, business models).
  • Preserve trade secrets, from financial models to client bases.
  • Comply with GDPR and national data protection laws, especially with cross-border information transfer.
  • Strengthen trust between partners, investors, and customers.
COREDO’s practice confirms: implementing NDA into the confidential information management structure reduces the likelihood of litigation, minimizes loss risks, and increases the company’s investment attractiveness.

How to Draft an NDA Independently in 2025

Illustration for the section "How to Draft an NDA Independently in 2025" in the article "How to Correctly Draft an NDA Independently in 2025"
If you have decided to understand how to draft an NDA independently in 2025, it is important to understand each step of this process and its key nuances. Even basic steps: from defining the agreement’s goals to identifying the parties, significantly influence how effectively your NDA will protect confidential information.

Defining NDA Goals and Parties

Before drafting an NDA, it is important to define:
  • The purpose of the agreement: protection of trade secrets, intellectual property, personal data, or comprehensive protection.
  • Parties: who discloses the information (disclosing party) and who receives (receiving party). In the case of bilateral or multilateral NDA: all participants must be clearly identified.
  • Scope of information: what data is considered confidential, and what are the criteria for their classification.
The COREDO team has implemented dozens of projects where mechanisms for minimizing legal risks were already laid out at this stage, for example, through precise descriptions of information categories, exceptions, and transfer procedures.

Mandatory Sections of an NDA: What to Include in 2025

In 2025, the requirements for an NDA have significantly complicated due to stricter regulation, digitalization of document management, and growth in cross-border operations. Here are the sections that should be in an NDA for international companies:
NDA Section Mandatory Recommended Description/Notes
Definition of parties Disclosing and receiving party
Subject of the agreement What is considered confidential information
Term of NDA Specific terms and renewal conditions
Liability and sanctions Amount of compensation, sanctions for disclosure
Dispute resolution procedure Arbitration, court, applicable law
Data storage procedure Conditions of storage, data destruction
NDA update procedure Procedure for updating the document
Electronic signature Possibility of signing in digital document flow
Key NDA points should include:
  • Precise definition of confidential information.
  • NDA duration: for different types of information, the duration may vary (e.g., for trade secrets – 3 years, for personal data, until the end of processing).
  • Sanctions for disclosure: amount of compensation, damage calculation mechanism, possibility of fines.
  • Dispute resolution procedure: choice of arbitration or court, applicable law.
  • Data storage conditions: where, how, and in what form the information should be stored, who has access to it.
  • NDA update procedure: how and when parties can make changes.
  • Possibility of using electronic signature and digital document flow.
COREDO’s practice shows that including these points significantly enhances the enforceability of NDA in different jurisdictions.

NDA Structure for International Business

The NDA structure for international companies in the EU, Asia, and Africa usually includes:
  1. Preamble: definition of parties, agreement objectives.
  2. Definitions: what is considered confidential information, exceptions.
  3. Parties’ obligations: confidentiality obligation, information usage conditions.
  4. NDA duration: indicating start and end dates.
  5. Liability and sanctions: damage compensation, fines, recovery procedures.
  6. Dispute resolution procedure: applicable law, arbitration/court.
  7. Data storage and destruction conditions.
  8. NDA update and revision procedure.
  9. Electronic signature and digital document flow (if applicable).
  10. Other provisions: force majeure, notices, contact persons.
COREDO’s solution is always adapted to the specific jurisdiction and business specifics – there are no universal templates, but such an NDA sample can be a starting point for drafting independently.

Enforceability of NDA in the EU, Asia, and Africa

Illustration for the section "Enforceability of NDA in the EU, Asia, and Africa" in the article "How to Correctly Draft an NDA Independently in 2025"
Enforceability of NDA in the EU, Asia, and Africa is not only a matter of contract language formality but also a complex task requiring consideration of local laws, court practices, and cultural differences. For international companies and startups, it’s important to understand in advance how realistic it is to protect confidential information across different jurisdictions and what strategic solutions can increase the chance of successful NDA execution.

NDAs for International Companies and Startups

International companies, technology startups, and small businesses face specific challenges when drafting NDAs:
  • Outsourcing and subcontractors: it’s necessary to clearly state the obligations of all parties, including beneficiaries, to eliminate “gray areas” of responsibility.
  • Cross-border data transfer: NDA must consider data export legislation requirements, especially in the EU (GDPR) and Asia (PDPA, CCPA).
  • NDA localization: adapting the text to the language and legal system of each partner country.
In one COREDO case for a fintech startup entering the Singapore and UAE markets, it was necessary to integrate requirements from three regulators simultaneously and consider the specifics of electronic document management.

NDA Requirements in the EU, Asia, and Africa 2025

In 2025, regulators tightened NDA requirements:
  • EU: mandatory GDPR compliance, separate block on personal data processing, mechanisms for cross-border information transfer, breach notification.
  • Asia: emphasis on trade secrets protection, mandatory regulator notification of leaks, data localization requirements (e.g., in Singapore and South Korea).
  • Africa: rapid growth of data protection legislation (POPIA, NDPR), special attention to enforceability and notification procedures.
COREDO’s team regularly audits clients’ NDAs to ensure they meet current requirements, minimizing the risk of fines and litigation.

Checking Enforceability and Reducing Legal Risks

Enforceability of NDA is the contract’s ability to be recognized and enforced in a particular jurisdiction. To check enforceability of NDA in different countries, it’s important to:
  • Adapt the text to local law (NDA localization).
  • Specify the applicable law and jurisdiction for dispute resolution.
  • State clear and measurable sanctions for violations.
  • Conduct regular NDA audits and updates in case of legislation changes.
COREDO’s experience shows: drafting an NDA without considering these nuances often leads to the inability to recover losses or apply sanctions in another country.

Digital Document Flow and Electronic Signature for NDA in 2025

Illustration for the section "Digital Document Flow and Electronic Signature for NDA in 2025" in the article "How to Correctly Draft an NDA Independently in 2025"
Digital Document Flow and Electronic Signature for NDA in 2025 become the standard for secure and efficient confidential information exchange between companies worldwide. It is important to consider how the choice of signing method and specifics of the electronic signature affect the legal force of NDA in various jurisdictions, including the EU, Asia, and Africa.

Electronic Signature for NDA in the EU, Asia, Africa

In 2025, electronic signature of NDA and digital document flow became the standard for international business. The EU is governed by eIDAS, with equivalent laws in Asia (e.g., in Singapore and Japan), and in Africa: national regulations.
  • Digital signature ensures the legal validity of NDA if identification of parties and document integrity requirements are met.
  • Digital document flow simplifies NDA storage, search, and updates, reducing costs for a paper archive.
  • It’s important to choose digital document flow platforms that meet compliance and Due Diligence requirements.
In one COREDO project for a large European corporation, implementing digital document flow and digital signature reduced the NDA approval cycle from 10 to 2 days.

Controlling NDA Execution: Automation and Metrics

Automating document flow with NDAs in 2025 is about more than speed; it also aids in obligation enforcement:
  • Using specialized platforms to track deadlines, renewal reminders, changes audit.
  • Integrating NDA into due diligence and compliance processes: automatic checking against internal policies and external requirements.
  • NDA effectiveness metrics: number of detected violations, average time for approval, ROI from prevented losses.
COREDO’s solutions enable large companies and startups to implement automation without losing flexibility and control.

Errors in NDA Drafting

Illustration for the section "Errors in NDA Drafting" in the article "How to Correctly Draft an NDA Independently in 2025"
Errors in NDA Drafting can lead to business vulnerabilities and risks of confidential information leaks. Entrepreneurs often underestimate the importance of details in this document, leading to typical missteps from the drafting stage. Let’s explore major NDA drafting errors and how to avoid them.

Errors by Entrepreneurs, How to Avoid Them?

Independent NDA drafting is often accompanied by critical errors:
  • Too broad or vague definition of confidential information: courts may deem NDA unenforceable.
  • Lack of clear sanctions for disclosure – inability to recover compensation.
  • Ignoring local legislative requirements, NDA loses legal force in cross-border operations.
  • Incorrect choice of applicable law and jurisdiction: complications in dispute resolution.
  • No procedure for NDA updating and revision: the document becomes outdated and doesn’t protect the business.
COREDO’s practice confirms: minimizing legal risks is achieved only by considering the specifics of each jurisdiction and regularly auditing NDA.

Consequences of NDA Breach for Business

In one COREDO case for a European IT company, a source code leak protected by NDA led to a legal dispute with a contractor. Thanks to clearly stated sanctions and the choice of arbitration in London, full compensation was recovered and further information dissemination was prevented.
In another project for an Asian startup, the absence of an NDA revision procedure resulted in the old document not accounting for new GDPR requirements, leading to a fine from the regulator.
These examples clearly show: NDA breaches can have long-term consequences – from financial losses to reputational damage in the market.

How to Draft an NDA in 2025

Illustration for the section "How to Draft an NDA in 2025" in the article "How to Correctly Draft an NDA Independently in 2025"
How to Draft an NDA in 2025 – a task requiring special attention to details and new legal standards. It is crucial not only to consider current requirements for structure and wording but also to foresee all key elements for protecting your interests. Below you will find a checklist that will help you draft an NDA independently, considering all the nuances of 2025.

Before proceeding to drafting, ensure all specifics of your situation are included in the final NDA version.

Checklist for Drafting NDA Independently

  1. Define NDA goals and the list of protected information.
  2. Clearly identify the disclosing and receiving parties.
  3. Provide exact definitions of confidential information and exceptions.
  4. Set the term of NDA and renewal conditions.
  5. Determine sanctions for breaches and compensation procedures for damages.
  6. Specify applicable law and dispute resolution procedure.
  7. Describe the conditions for information storage, destruction, and transfer.
  8. Include an NDA update procedure.
  9. Allow for electronic signature and digital document flow usage.
  10. Conduct an NDA audit for compliance with jurisdictional requirements (compliance, due diligence).

When a Lawyer is Needed for Business

If your business operates in multiple countries, processes personal data or intellectual property, or if you are uncertain about NDA enforceability: hiring an expert becomes a necessity. COREDO’s solutions always consider industry specifics, regulatory requirements, and current market trends.
Legal business support minimizes risks, optimizes due diligence processes, and ensures compliance at all stages.
Involving COREDO professionals guarantees adaptation of legal solutions to specific jurisdictions and industry standards – let’s review key conclusions for businesses in the EU, Asia, and Africa.

Conclusions for Business in the EU, Asia, and Africa

  • NDA is not a formality but a strategic tool for protecting business, intellectual property, and trade secrets.
  • Independent NDA drafting requires deep understanding of legal, technological, and management aspects: from choosing the type of agreement to implementing document flow automation.
  • Regular updating, auditing, and adapting NDA to jurisdictional and regulatory requirements: a mandatory condition for minimizing legal risks.
  • Electronic signature, digital document flow, and automation of NDA execution control: key trends of 2025 that improve business process efficiency and transparency.
  • Timely involvement of experts and legal business support, an investment in the company’s resilience, scalability, and competitiveness.
COREDO’s practice confirms: a well-crafted NDA is not just a document, but a part of corporate culture that ensures long-term protection and growth of business in any jurisdiction.

In 2024, the global volume of laundered criminal proceeds exceeded $2.7 trillion: more than the GDP of most countries in the world. In just the last two years, the fines for non-compliance with Anti-Money Laundering (AML) requirements have increased by 42%, and the number of regulatory investigations has almost doubled. Virtual assets, DeFi, and stablecoins are rapidly changing the landscape of financial risks, and international AML standards are becoming increasingly stringent and complex for global business. How can you ensure compliance control without losing flexibility in the face of multi-jurisdictional regulations? Are your processes ready for the new FATF requirements and local regulators in the EU, Asia, and Africa? Why is implementing AML into business processes becoming not just a legal obligation but a matter of survival and company reputation?

Over the years, the COREDO team has frequently encountered situations where even experienced international companies underestimated the depth and speed of changes in the field of AML compliance. In this article, I will thoroughly examine the key trends of AML 2025, provide practical recommendations for implementation and improvement of financial monitoring, and share strategies that truly work in the EU, Asia, and Africa. If you want not just to meet the requirements but to use AML as a competitive advantage, read to the end. Here you will find answers to the most pressing business questions and tools for confident progress.

AML Trends in 2025

Illustration for the section "AML Trends in 2025" in the article "Anti-Money Laundering – Relevance and AML Trends in 2025"
AML trends in 2025 are already shaping a new reality for financial market participants. In the near future, the anti-money laundering system is expecting major changes due to updated FATF requirements and significant legislative amendments. These changes require not only the adaptation of business processes but also the revision of internal control and compliance procedures.

New FATF Requirements and Legal Changes

In 2025, the FATF (Financial Action Task Force) recommendations become even more detailed and mandatory for implementation in national legislation.
Special attention is given to Recommendation 15, which regulates new technologies and virtual assets.
The international assessment of compliance with FATF standards is conducted with the consideration of multi-jurisdictional control, which is especially important for companies operating in multiple countries.
A real case from COREDO’s practice: a fintech client planning to launch a VASP (Virtual Asset Service Provider) in the EU and Asia faced the need for simultaneous licensing under new FATF standards and national requirements.

The solution developed at COREDO included a detailed audit of business processes, adaptation of internal AML policies, and integration with international databases, which allowed successful completion of VASP Licensing in both jurisdictions.

Artificial Intelligence and Big Data in AML

AML 2025 is no longer just about regulations and paperwork. Machine learning, Big Data, and RegTech platforms are becoming standard for the automation of AML processes and financial monitoring. Modern AML systems can analyze millions of transactions in real time, identify complex money laundering schemes, and minimize the number of false positives.

COREDO’s experience shows that implementing platforms for AML automation can reduce compliance costs by up to 30% and increase the speed of processing suspicious transactions by 4 times.

Solutions integrating blockchain analytics and automatic transaction monitoring for cryptocurrencies and DeFi are particularly effective.

At the same time, the rapid development of decentralized finance and stablecoins requires separate attention from regulators and market participants.

Regulation of DeFi and Stablecoins in 2025

In 2025, the regulation of virtual assets becomes one of the key areas in the fight against money laundering. The GENIUS Act and updated VASP licensing requirements demand companies implement comprehensive AML procedures, including blockchain analytics and risk assessment when working with DeFi and stablecoins.

The COREDO team has implemented projects for licensing cryptocurrency companies in the EU and Asia, where particular attention was given to transaction analysis for laundering risks.

The introduction of automated monitoring systems and employee training on new FATF standards not only ensured compliance with regulatory requirements but also increased trust from banks and partners.

AML Compliance for International Business

Illustration for the section "AML Compliance for International Business" in the article "Anti-Money Laundering – Relevance and AML Trends in 2025"
AML compliance for international business is not just a formal requirement but a key element of the strategy for managing financial risks when operating in foreign markets. To effectively implement these measures, verification procedures like KYC and timely reporting of suspicious activities are of particular importance, as they create the foundation for preventing financial crimes and maintaining trust among partners and regulators.

KYC Verification and SAR Reporting

Effective compliance control is impossible without modern KYC (Know Your Customer) and CDD (Customer Due Diligence) procedures. In 2025, these processes require integration with international databases, automation of data collection and verification, as well as regular updates of client information.

COREDO’s practice confirms that automation of KYC/CDD reduces client verification time from several days to a few hours.
The implementation of Suspicious Activity Reporting (SAR) systems allows timely identification and blocking of suspicious operations, reducing the risk of fines and reputational losses.

AML: Differences in Implementation in the EU, Asia, and Africa

Implementing AML in the EU, Asia, and Africa requires consideration of differences in national regulations, levels of maturity of financial monitoring systems, and specifics of working with virtual assets. For instance, the EU has strict harmonization of FATF standards, but there are local nuances regarding VASP licensing and reporting requirements. In Asia, countries have diverse approaches to cryptocurrency and DeFi regulation, while in Africa, the main challenges include weak transaction control and a high proportion of offshore structures.

The COREDO team has developed multi-jurisdictional control strategies for clients entering Southeast Asian and EU markets, which minimized compliance risks and accelerated the process of registering legal entities and obtaining financial licenses.

Comparison of AML requirements in the EU, Asia, and Africa:

Region Main AML Requirements Regulatory Features Main Risks/Penalties
EU FATF standards, KYC, CDD, SAR, VASP licensing Strict harmonization, but there are local nuances High fines, risk of account freezing
Asia Partial harmonization, local standards Country-specific differences, focus on cryptocurrencies Licensing risks, banking complexities
Africa FATF standards implementation, low system maturity Many offshore entities, weak transaction control Reputational and legal risks

Audit and Optimization of AML Processes

AML process audit is a key tool for assessing the effectiveness of anti-money laundering systems. In 2025, international regulators require not just formal compliance but the actual effectiveness of internal AML policies, regular employee training, and transparent reporting.

COREDO’s project for preparing a major fintech company in Singapore for an audit included a comprehensive check of KYC/CDD procedures, automation of suspicious activity reporting, and the implementation of a reputational risk assessment system.

This approach allowed for a successful audit and timely acquisition of the VASP license without delays.

IT and Automation in AML 2025

Illustration for the section "IT and Automation in AML 2025" in the article "Anti-Money Laundering – Relevance and AML Trends in 2025"
IT and automation in AML 2025 are radically changing approaches to identifying and preventing financial crimes. Modern technologies allow real-time analysis of vast amounts of transactions, automatically detecting suspicious operations and client behavior anomalies. These tools are becoming standard for companies striving for compliance with international requirements and effective risk management.

In this context, effective transaction monitoring and timely detection of suspicious activities become particularly significant.

Transaction Monitoring and Suspicious Activities

Modern IT in AML allows for the automation of transaction monitoring, uses machine learning to detect complex laundering schemes, and reduces the share of false positives. In 2025, such solutions become a mandatory element of AML compliance for companies dealing with large transaction volumes and virtual assets.

COREDO’s experience shows that automated AML processes not only speed up data processing but also allow for quick responses to new fraud schemes and cyber-threats by integrating data from international databases and blockchain analytics.

RegTech and Blockchain Analytics for AML

RegTech platforms are becoming standard for automating AML processes, especially in transaction analysis for laundering and integration with international databases. Blockchain analytics allows tracking the origin of funds, identifying connections between addresses, and assessing risks when working with DeFi and stablecoins.

The COREDO team has implemented RegTech-based solutions for clients from the EU and Asia, ensuring compliance with new FATF requirements and boosting financial monitoring efficiency.

Cyber Risks and Digital Laundering Schemes

In 2025, cyber risks in AML come to the forefront: digital currencies, DeFi, and crowdfunding are used for complex laundering and terrorism financing (CFT) schemes.

Effective AML risk management strategies include integration with international databases, automated transaction analysis, and employee training on new threats.

In practice, COREDO implements multi-jurisdictional control and regular audits of digital channels, which allow timely identification and blocking of suspicious activities, reducing reputational and financial risks.

Implementing AML Compliance in an International Company

Illustration for the section "Implementing AML Compliance in an International Company" in the article "Anti-Money Laundering – Relevance and AML Trends in 2025"
Implementing AML compliance in an international company becomes a necessity for protecting the business from financial crimes and adhering to international standards. Effective implementation of AML procedures not only minimizes legal and financial risks but also establishes a transparent, sustainable management system.

Steps to Implement AML Procedures

Implementing effective AML compliance requires a systematic approach and clear sequence of actions.

Based on COREDO’s experience, I suggest the following algorithm:

  1. Audit current processes, assess internal policy compliance with international AML standards and FATF requirements.
  2. Implement KYC/CDD, automate client verification procedures with integration of international databases.
  3. Automate transaction monitoring – introduce RegTech platforms and machine learning for transaction analysis.
  4. Train staff: regular training on new AML requirements, raising awareness of cyber risks.
  5. Integrate with international databases, ensuring access to up-to-date information on clients and transactions.
  6. Regular audit and optimization, continuous process improvement, preparation for regulator checks.
When implemented correctly, this algorithm enhances company resilience to AML risks and minimizes the likelihood of violations – further, we’ll look at how to prepare for audits and reduce risks.

How to Prepare for Audits and Reduce Risks

Preparing for AML process audits requires not just formal compliance but transparency of all procedures, documentation of decisions, and interaction with regulators.
Assessing reputational risks and implementing management strategies for them is a mandatory part of corporate policy.

In one of COREDO’s cases for an international payment platform, a project was implemented to integrate automated reporting systems and train employees to handle incidents, which minimized fines and maintained partner trust.

AML Requirements: Employee Training

Training employees in AML and raising awareness of new threats is a key factor in the entire system’s effectiveness. Regular training, updates to internal policies, and integration of new FATF standards into corporate culture not only ensure compliance but also build a solid market reputation.

At COREDO, we implement training programs for clients, which include practical cases, working with RegTech platforms, and analyzing current cyber risks.

Conclusions and Advice for Business

Illustration for the section "Conclusions and Advice for Business" in the article "Anti-Money Laundering – Relevance and AML Trends in 2025"
In 2025, anti-money laundering becomes one of the key factors for the sustainability and competitiveness of international business. Best AML risk management practices include process automation, integration with international databases, regular audits, and staff training. Implementing new FATF standards, adapting to local requirements, and using modern RegTech tools not only minimize costs but also increase ROI from compliance investments.

Summary Table: Key Trends, Risks, and Solutions in AML 2025

Trend/Risk Solution/Tool
Stricter FATF Requirements Audit and adaptation of internal policies
Growth of virtual assets volume VASP licensing, blockchain analytics
Cyber risks and DeFi Automated monitoring, training
Multi-jurisdictional control Integration with international databases
Increase in fines and checks Regular audit, SAR reporting

Actionable advice for business:

  • Conduct an audit of current AML processes and adapt them to FATF 2025 standards.
  • Implement automated platforms for KYC/CDD and transaction monitoring.
  • Regularly train employees on new requirements and cyber threats.
  • Integrate AML control into due diligence processes during mergers and acquisitions.
  • Use RegTech solutions to reduce costs and increase efficiency.

Useful resources and documents:

If you are looking for a strategic partner to implement and improve AML compliance, COREDO’s team is ready to offer comprehensive solutions based on deep understanding of international standards and practical experience in the EU, Asia, and Africa.

In 2025, more than 60% of cryptocurrency startups planning to enter the European market faced the need to completely overhaul their business models due to MiCA regulation and tightened AML compliance. While institutional investors are increasing requirements for transparency and legal harmonization, many international companies note: EU new rules not only raise costs but also create market entry barriers for innovative projects, especially in the stablecoin and asset tokenization segment.

Why do even experienced entrepreneurs, who have successfully registered companies in the EU, find themselves at a dead end when attempting to obtain a cryptocurrency license or comply with 5AMLD and FATF standards? How to choose a strategy if MiCA doesn’t suit your business, and the risks of legal uncertainty and compliance become critical?
In this article, I will detail when MiCA is truly disadvantageous or impossible for crypto businesses, and why Switzerland is one of the few alternatives that allow not only legal scaling but also maintaining flexibility, innovation, and tax clarity. Based on COREDO’s practice and the latest data from international regulators, you will receive a step-by-step guide on how to choose and implement a market entry strategy for the EU and Asia without losing time and competitive advantages. I recommend reading the article to the end – here you will find unobvious solutions that already work in practice.

When MiCA Doesn’t Suit Crypto Businesses

Illustration for the section "When MiCA Doesn
MiCA regulation is intended to unify approaches to the regulation of crypto assets in the EU, but in practice, not all business models and scaling strategies fit within its framework. COREDO experts have repeatedly encountered situations where the adoption of MiCA created additional barriers for international companies, especially regarding AML compliance and cross-border licensing.

Limitations of MiCA for International Companies

MiCA introduces strict requirements for the classification of crypto assets, corporate governance, and asset custody. For companies working with innovative business models, such as asset tokenization or stablecoins, these requirements become not only financially burdensome but also hinder the rapid launch of projects. Crypto asset management protocols must comply with unified EU standards, which limits flexibility and requires significant investment in legal harmonization and integration of AML/KYC processes.

In COREDO’s practice, there have been cases where even after successful company registration in the EU and preliminary regulatory approval, product launches were delayed for months due to the need for additional validations of KYC procedures and corporate governance. For institutional investors, this means increased operational risks and reduced attractiveness of the European jurisdiction for innovative projects.

When MiCA is Disadvantageous for Crypto Businesses

MiCA is not suitable for companies focused on rapid scaling, working in multiple markets, or providing flexible crypto services (e.g., custodial services, DeFi products, multi-asset platforms). Compliance for cryptocurrency companies in Asia and other regions is often based on different principles, and integrating these processes within the MiCA framework requires significant time and resources.

Moreover, MiCA does not always consider the specifics of risk management in cross-border operations and imposes increased requirements on corporate governance and transparency, which can be critical for startups and companies operating in rapidly changing market segments. In such cases, alternatives to MiCA for crypto businesses become not just desirable but necessary to maintain competitiveness.

Cryptocurrency Regulation in Switzerland

Illustration for the section "Cryptocurrency Regulation in Switzerland" in the article "When MiCA Doesn
Switzerland has long established itself as a jurisdiction with high transparency of crypto asset regulations and a flexible approach to innovation. A solution developed by COREDO for one of the clients showed that registering a crypto business in Switzerland allows not only obtaining a VASP license in the shortest possible time but also ensuring the legalization of cryptocurrency operations in accordance with FATF and AMLA requirements.

Thus, opening a crypto business in Switzerland requires careful adherence to regulatory procedures and standards set by FINMA; let’s review the key VASP requirements for 2025.

FINMA Requirements for VASP in 2025

FINMA (Swiss regulator) establishes clear yet flexible rules for VASP (Virtual Asset Service Provider). By 2025, requirements for corporate governance, custody, and asset reservation, as well as AML/KYC process integration, have become even more structured, while maintaining adaptability for innovative models. To obtain a crypto license in Switzerland, you need to:

  • Confirm transparency of the corporate structure and sources of funding.
  • Implement KYC and AML procedures in accordance with AMLA and FATF standards.
  • Ensure custody and reservation of assets comparable to the banking sector.
  • Demonstrate sustainable risk management and internal protocols for crypto asset management.
COREDO practice confirms: for companies oriented towards institutional investors, compliance with FINMA requirements becomes a significant competitive advantage.
These standards serve as a foundation for the sustainable development of the crypto industry and seamlessly transfer into AML and KYC requirements that every market player must comply with.

AML and KYC for Crypto Business in Switzerland

AML compliance in Switzerland is based on principles of transparency and preventive control. Key requirements include:

  • Multi-level client identification (KYC), including for complex corporate structures and transactions involving stablecoins.
  • Use of transaction analysis technologies and suspicious operation monitoring.
  • Integration of AML/KYC processes into the company’s business processes considering FATF and 5AMLD requirements.
The COREDO team implemented projects where the integration of KYC procedures not only reduced compliance risks for clients but also increased trust from international partners and investors. Special attention is paid to privacy and data protection issues, which is especially important for companies working with institutional and private clients from Asia and the EU.

Cryptocurrency Taxes in Russia

One of Switzerland’s key advantages is its high tax clarity for crypto assets. Unlike most EU countries, where tax regimes for crypto businesses vary and often change, Switzerland has a transparent taxation system:

  • Crypto assets are recognized as property and are taxed on capital, not income.
  • Companies involved in asset tokenization and stablecoins are eligible for tax benefits and special regimes.
  • Tax burden optimization is possible for cross-border operations, as confirmed by COREDO’s experience in supporting clients from the EU and Asia.
Such transparency allows accurately assessing ROI for crypto companies and minimizing tax dispute risks.

MiCA or Swiss Crypto Regulation: Comparison

Criteria MiCA (EU) Switzerland (FINMA)
Legal Harmonization Yes (unified rules for the EU) No (national approach)
AML/KYC Requirements Strict, standardized Strict, but flexible
Tax Clarity Depends on the EU country High, transparent
Innovation Possibility Pilot regimes, but more restrictions Flexibility, support for innovations
Licensing Costs and Timing Higher, longer Lower, faster
Cross-Border Licensing Yes (within the EU) No, but easy export of services
Judicial Practice Being formed Rich experience
Comparing MiCA and FINMA regulation, I note: for companies, prioritizing flexibility, innovation, and tax clarity, Swiss jurisdiction often proves more preferable. This is especially relevant for startups working with new business models where pilot regimes and support for innovations play a key role.

Crypto License in Switzerland for the EU

Illustration for the section "Crypto License in Switzerland for the EU" in the article "When MiCA Doesn
The decision to register a cryptocurrency business in Switzerland requires a strategic approach and a deep understanding of regulatory requirements. COREDO’s experience shows: a clear roadmap and professional legal support minimize risks and accelerate market entry into the EU and Asia.

Therefore, successful company registration and obtaining a license in Switzerland requires a phased approach and careful preparation for each stage, which forms the basis for further consideration of the structural and legal nuances of the process.

Registration and Licensing of a Crypto Business in Switzerland

  1. Choosing an Organizational-Legal Form: Preference is usually given to AG or GmbH, providing flexibility in corporate governance.
  2. Preparation of Founding Documents and Business Plan: It is important to detail the management structure, funding sources, and asset storage mechanisms.
  3. Submitting an Application to FINMA: Includes disclosure of beneficial owners, description of AML/KYC processes, and internal control.
  4. Implementing Compliance Procedures: At this stage, COREDO develops individual AML/KYC policies, integrating transaction analysis and monitoring technologies.
  5. Obtaining a VASP License and Company Registration: Once FINMA approves, the company can officially provide crypto services and scale the business to the EU and Asian markets.

AML/KYC and Compliance with FATF Requirements

For successful licensing, it is critical to ensure compliance not only with Swiss but also with international FATF and 5AMLD standards. COREDO practice showed: integrating AML/KYC processes into business processes not only meets regulator requirements but also increases the company’s investment appeal.

Key Elements:

  • Use of automated transaction monitoring systems.
  • Regular employee training and internal process audits.
  • Implementing risk management and reporting protocols for institutional investors.

ROI and Risks of Swiss Jurisdiction

The ROI assessment for crypto companies in Switzerland is based on balancing licensing costs, tax burden, and scaling opportunities. A solution developed by COREDO for a client reduced costs by 30% compared to a similar project in the EU and enabled entry into new markets due to the ease of cross-border operations.

On the other hand, it is important to consider strategic risks:
– Lack of automatic cross-border licensing within the EU.
– Need for constant monitoring of regulatory changes.
– Potential barriers when entering the EU market related to legal harmonization.

Where to Scale a Crypto Business: Switzerland, EU, or Asia?

Illustration for the section "Where to Scale a Crypto Business: Switzerland, EU, or Asia?" in the article "When MiCA Doesn
the choice of jurisdiction for scaling a crypto business depends on strategic goals, client structure, and product features. COREDO’s experience covers company registration in the EU, Asia, and Switzerland, allowing an objective evaluation of each model’s advantages.

– Switzerland, optimal for innovative startups focused on institutional investors and international markets, where regulatory flexibility and tax clarity are critical.
– EU, suitable for companies targeting the mass market and cross-border licensing within a single legal field, provided they are ready for high compliance costs.
– Asia is attractive for projects working with high-tech products and multi-jurisdictional clients but requires special attention to compliance and local AML/KYC requirements.

The EU market entry strategies developed by COREDO include a comprehensive evaluation of legal, tax, and operational risks, as well as AML/KYC process integration for multi-jurisdictional businesses.

Recommendations for Entrepreneurs

Illustration for the section "Recommendations for Entrepreneurs" in the article "When MiCA Doesn

  • The MiCA regulation is a powerful tool for legal harmonization but not a universal solution for all business models.
  • Switzerland offers a unique combination of flexibility, transparency, and tax clarity for crypto businesses, especially in innovative services and asset tokenization segments.
  • The key to successfully entering the EU and Asian markets: professional legal support, AML/KYC process integration, and constant monitoring of regulatory changes.
  • COREDO practice confirms: an individualized approach to jurisdiction selection and compliance architecture building allows not only to minimize risks but also significantly increase the company’s investment appeal.
  • For long-term success, building corporate governance oriented towards institutional investor and international regulator requirements is critical.

MiCA and Switzerland: Answering Questions

In which cases is MiCA disadvantageous for a crypto business?
MiCA is not suitable for companies focused on rapid scaling, flexible business models, and innovative products, where integrating AML/KYC and corporate governance requires individualized solutions.
What advantages does registering a company in Switzerland provide for a crypto startup?
High tax clarity, regulatory flexibility, support for innovative models, and a developed crypto infrastructure in Switzerland allow for rapid business launch and scaling while maintaining compliance with international standards.
What are the risks in choosing Switzerland instead of MiCA?
The main risks are related to the absence of automatic cross-border licensing in the EU and the necessity of constant monitoring of changes in European regulation.
How to ensure compliance with FATF and 5AMLD when registering a company in Switzerland?
Implement multi-level AML/KYC processes, use transaction analysis technologies, and conduct regular internal audits, which COREDO practices have proven effective for international crypto companies.
What are the real costs and timelines for obtaining a VASP license in Switzerland?
On average, the process takes from 3 to 6 months, with costs 20-30% lower than licensing in the EU. The final cost depends on the business structure and chosen risk management model.
What are the alternative jurisdictions for crypto businesses?
Besides the EU and Switzerland, Singapore, Estonia, Cyprus, and the UK are in demand – each with its own regulatory features, taxation, and compliance specifics.
How to integrate AML/KYC processes for a multi-jurisdictional crypto business?
It is recommended to use automated solutions adapted to different regulatory requirements and to build a compliance architecture considering the specifics of each jurisdiction.
What are the long-term consequences of choosing Swiss jurisdiction for investors and businesses?
Regulatory stability, a developed legal framework for crypto-assets, and support for innovations make Switzerland attractive for long-term investments and scaling of crypto businesses.
If you face a choice between MiCA and Swiss regulation: COREDO’s team is ready to offer a strategy based on real cases and a deep understanding of international standards.

Every 60 seconds, more than 1.5 million dollars are laundered worldwide, according to official estimates published in FATF and UN reports. Despite stricter anti-money laundering legislation, the global damage from financial crimes exceeds trillions of dollars annually. But the greater threat is not so much the scale, but the speed and technological sophistication of the schemes faced by modern business.
Have you ever considered how vulnerable your legal entity registration processes, international transactions, or even a simple customer base are to AML risks?

In the era of digitalization and cross-border operations, ignoring anti-money laundering (AML) requirements means knowingly exposing your business to the risks of account freezes, multi-million euro fines, and reputational damage that may not always be reversible.

My experience at COREDO shows that even large companies successfully operating in the EU, Asia, or the Middle East encounter unexpected challenges when implementing AML policies.

The problem is not only in the multi-level regulatory requirements (FATF, EBA, MAS, FCA, FSCA) but also in the need to build an internal culture of compliance where financial monitoring, Customer Due Diligence (CDD), and corporate ethics become integral parts of business processes.
In this article, I will analyze in detail where and how to acquire truly practical knowledge on AML, how to choose the appropriate training and certification, implement effective procedures in an international company, and avoid typical mistakes that lead to fines and blockages. If you want not only to comply with international standards but to build a sustainable system of financial compliance, I recommend reading to the end. Here you will find practical recommendations tested on dozens of COREDO cases in the EU, Asia, and the CIS.

AML Training: Where to Get Basic Knowledge?

Illustration for the "AML Training: Where to Get Basic Knowledge?" section in the "AML – Where to Learn the Basics and Practice" article
Building a sustainable anti-money laundering system is impossible without systematic AML training for business owners, executives, and employees. International AML standards and FATF recommendations require not only the implementation of formal procedures but also regular skills enhancement through specialized AML courses, training, and certification.

The Best AML Courses for Business in the EU, Asia, Africa

In recent years, the COREDO team has implemented dozens of educational projects for clients in the EU, Singapore, Cyprus, UAE, and Mauritius. Our analysis of the international AML training market shows:
  • ACAMS (Association of Certified Anti-Money Laundering Specialists) is recognized as the world standard for AML officers, executives, and business owners. ACAMS certification is valued among regulators in the EU, UK, Singapore, and UAE.
  • European Institute of Management, focused on EU specifics, including EBA and national regulator requirements.
  • MAS AML Training (Singapore), relevant for fintech companies and banks operating under the supervision of the Monetary Authority of Singapore.
  • FinTech AML Academy – focuses on startups, fintech, and e-commerce, with an emphasis on practical cases and the integration of AML processes into innovative business models.
Course/Platform Region Format Certification Target Audience Features
ACAMS Global Online/Offline Yes Executives, officers International recognition
European Institute of Management EU Online Yes Business, fintech Specialized in the EU
MAS AML Training Singapore, Asia Online Yes Banks, fintech Regional requirements
FinTech AML Academy Global Online No Startups, fintech Practical cases

How to Choose an AML Course for Employees and Executives

The choice of AML training program depends on the business model, jurisdiction, and scale of operations. COREDO’s experience shows:

  • For international holdings and banking groups, courses focusing on FATF recommendations, Customer Due Diligence (CDD), Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD), and corporate AML policy are optimal.
  • Startups and fintech companies should choose training that addresses AML issues for virtual currencies, electronic money, cyber risks, and process automation.
  • For top management and business owners, the focus is on strategic risk management, ROI from AML training investments, and practical aspects of implementing internal AML controls.
COREDO’s solution for multinational clients includes a hybrid approach: basic training for all employees, specialized AML courses for officers, and regular training on new regulatory requirements (e.g., changes in the AML/CFT Act, company sanctions policy implementation, new transaction monitoring requirements).

Certification and Training for Business

AML certification is not just a formality, but a strategic tool for minimizing risks and increasing trust from banks, partners, and regulators. International AML standards and FATF recommendations require key employees to undergo regular training, confirm their qualifications, and document the results (e.g., through internal AML documentation and corporate AML policy).

COREDO’s practice confirms that having certified AML officers significantly speeds up the registration of legal entities in the EU, obtaining licenses for payment services, MSOL licenses for payment institutions, and opening accounts in banks in Singapore, Cyprus, or the UK.

Implementing AML for Business: Step by Step

Illustration for the "Implementing AML for Business: Step by Step" section in the "AML – Where to Learn the Basics and Practice" article
Implementing AML policy is a process that requires not only knowledge of legislation but also a deep understanding of business processes, corporate structure, and regulatory specifics of a particular jurisdiction. The solutions that COREDO’s team has implemented for clients in the EU, Asia, and UAE are always based on the principles of thorough customer verification (KYC, CDD, EDD), transaction monitoring automation, and regular AML audits.

Effective AML System for the Company

Effective AML procedures for companies include:

  • Developing an internal AML policy based on international standards (FATF, AML/CFT Act, EBA, FCA, MAS recommendations).
  • Assigning responsible persons (AML officer, internal AML control), conducting training and certification.
  • Implementing Customer Due Diligence (CDD), Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD), customer profiling, and sanctions screening procedures.
  • Setting up automated transaction monitoring, detection of suspicious activities (Suspicious Activity Report, SAR), and regular updates of procedures considering new risks.

Documentation and AML Procedures

Efficient AML documentation is the foundation of compliance transparency and manageability. At COREDO, we recommend:

  • Maintaining a centralized registry of all KYC/AML procedures, including the results of beneficiary verification (beneficial ownership), internal investigations, and financial monitoring reports.
  • Conducting regular internal audits and AML risk assessments, documenting the results, and adjusting the corporate AML policy.
  • Implementing the company’s sanctions policy, ensuring monitoring of its implementation, and storing all documents in accordance with EU, Asia, and Africa regulators’ requirements.

KYC/AML for E-commerce and Fintech

Particularly important is AML for fintech companies, e-commerce, and payment institutions. In these sectors, it is critically important to:

  • Integrate KYC/AML systems with internal platforms, automate customer verification and transaction monitoring.
  • Consider the specifics of electronic money, cryptocurrencies, and virtual currencies AML, as well as manage cyber risks.
  • Obtain and maintain MSOL licenses for payment institutions, comply with regulatory sandboxes requirements, and regularly update procedures according to new fraud threats.

AML in the EU, Asia, and Africa: Features

Illustration for the "AML in the EU, Asia, and Africa: Features" section in the "AML – Where to Learn the Basics and Practice" article
Registration of legal entities in the EU, Asia, and Africa requires deep knowledge of regional AML requirements, licensing specifics, and interactions with regulatory bodies.

AML: Regional Requirements and Features

The COREDO team has accumulated unique experience in implementing AML systems in Estonia, Cyprus, Singapore, Hong Kong, UAE, and Mauritius.

  • In Estonia and Cyprus, the focus is on transparency of ownership structure, identifying beneficiaries, and comprehensive customer verification.
  • In Singapore and Hong Kong, regulators (MAS, HKMA) require regular updates of CDD procedures, the implementation of automated AML platforms, and integration with state databases.
  • In UAE and Mauritius, international AML cooperation, information exchange with other jurisdictions, and compliance with FATF standards are emphasized.

Compliance with FATF Requirements

The key to successful compliance with international AML standards is the implementation of multi-level procedures for Due diligence, Customer Due Diligence (CDD), identifying beneficiaries (beneficial ownership), and regular AML risk assessment.
COREDO’s solutions for clients in the EU and Asia include:

  • Conducting independent AML audits, preparing for regulatory inspections, and documenting all procedures.
  • Setting up a transaction monitoring system, sanctions screening, and automated SAR generation.
  • Continuous employee training, updating corporate AML policies, and integrating new FATF requirements into daily practice.

Implementation Mistakes in AML Practice

Illustration for the "Implementation Mistakes in AML Practice" section in the "AML – Where to Learn the Basics and Practice" article
When considering the typical mistakes in AML implementation and their consequences, it is important to understand why these issues are so critical to business.

Implementation Mistakes in AML and Their Consequences

The most common mistakes identified by COREDO’s practice:

  • Insufficient detail in internal AML policy and lack of regular updates to procedures.
  • Ignoring sanctions screening requirements, resulting in account freezes and fines from European and Asian regulators.
  • A formal approach to Customer Due Diligence (CDD) and lack of internal AML control, which in some cases led to investigations, asset freezes, and lengthy internal inquiries.
Non-compliance with AML not only results in fines but also long-term consequences: loss of access to banking services, inability to register new legal entities, and decreased trust from partners and investors.

AML: Examples of Implementation in International Companies

COREDO’s solutions implemented for clients in the EU and Asia include:
  • Conducting comprehensive audits and implementing automated AML platforms integrated into ERP systems.
  • Developing KPIs for monitoring AML compliance, regularly assessing procedure effectiveness, and adjusting corporate policy considering new threats.
  • Organizing regular training, educating AML officers and employees, which significantly reduced fraud risks and improved resilience to internal and external threats.

AML Automation Technologies: Trends 2025

Illustration for the "AML Automation Technologies: Trends 2025" section in the "AML – Where to Learn the Basics and Practice" article
This requires a competent choice of the right AML platform, meeting your business needs.

How to Choose an AML Platform

When selecting an AML platform, the COREDO team recommends considering:

  • The ability to integrate with the company’s internal systems (ERP, CRM, banking gateways).
  • Support for automation of transaction monitoring, sanctions screening, and SAR generation.
  • Available tools for AML risk assessment, client profiling, and AML documentation management.
  • Flexibility in customizing to different jurisdiction requirements and scalability when entering new markets.
For startups and companies without their own compliance team, outsourcing AML functions with external providers specializing in international standards is optimal.

KPI and Evaluation of AML System Effectiveness

Evaluating AML system effectiveness is based on:

  • Regularly checking corporate policy compliance with international standards (FATF, EBA, MAS).
  • Analyzing key metrics: the number of identified suspicious transactions, SAR processing speed, CDD/EDD success rate, level of process automation.
  • Conducting independent AML audits, analyzing incidents, and adjusting procedures based on identified weaknesses.
COREDO’s practice showed that implementing a KPI system for monitoring AML compliance allows not only to minimize risks but to significantly reduce compliance costs.

Practical Recommendations for Business

  • Invest in AML training for executives and employees, choose internationally recognized courses and certifications.
  • Develop and regularly update internal AML policy, taking into account the specifics of jurisdictions and business models.
  • Implement automated systems for transaction monitoring, sanctions screening, and AML documentation.
  • Use AML function outsourcing when lacking internal resources, especially when entering new markets.
  • Conduct regular internal audits, AML risk assessments, and adjust procedures in accordance with new regulatory requirements.

For effective compliance, it is important to keep employees’ knowledge up-to-date and respond to regulatory changes promptly.

Frequently Asked Questions About AML Training

Where to undergo AML training for business in the EU?
I recommend training at COREDO.
How to choose an AML course for company executives?
Focus on programs emphasizing international standards, practical cases, and strategic risk management.
What is the ROI from investing in AML employee training?
COREDO’s practice confirms: companies with trained staff are less likely to face account freezes, pass Licensing faster, and gain access to international banking services.
What difficulties arise when scaling an AML system in an international group of companies?
The main challenges are synchronizing procedures across jurisdictions, automating processes, and regularly training personnel.
What key metrics and KPIs are used for monitoring AML compliance?
Number of suspicious transactions, SAR processing speed, successful CDD/EDD rate, automation level.
How to ensure AML compliance during the registration of a legal entity in different jurisdictions?
Use international standards (FATF, EBA, MAS), integrate KYC/AML procedures with internal systems, and regularly update policy.
How to align AML requirements with GDPR compliance?
Implement procedures for data processing consent, use secure information transfer channels, and regularly update internal policies.
How to choose between an internal AML officer and outsourcing functions?
For large companies – an internal officer with regular training; for startups and fast-growing businesses: outsourcing with quality service control.

If you want to get individual consultation on implementing AML or selecting the optimal training for your team, the COREDO team is always ready to share their experience and offer strategic solutions proven in the most demanding jurisdictions.

In 2025, over 40% of global investments in the crypto industry will be accounted for by Asia, and Singapore, according to CB Insights, is among the top three global leaders in the number of new fintech and crypto startups. However, behind this growth lies a paradox: despite the launch of MiCA in the EU, many international companies prefer company registration in Singapore and obtaining a cryptocurrency license here. Why? The answer lies in the unique combination of regulatory flexibility, transparency of AML compliance, and speed to market.
Today entrepreneurs face a dilemma: choose the EU with its MiCA 2025 and strict regulatory frameworks or bet on Singapore, where the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) creates conditions for scaling and innovation. Which jurisdiction to trust for the strategic development of the business to avoid regulatory traps, ensure long-term sustainability, and gain access to Asian and global markets?
In this article, I will thoroughly analyze the key differences between Singapore and the EU (MiCA), based on the experience of the COREDO team in company registration, obtaining financial licenses, and supporting crypto businesses in both jurisdictions. If you are looking for more than just an overview, but practical guidance and strategic insights: I recommend reading to the end.

Crypto Regulation in Singapore and MAS

Illustration for the section "Crypto Regulation in Singapore and MAS" in the article "Singapore instead of MiCA in 2025"

Singapore’s cryptocurrency regulation is not just a set of laws but a flexible ecosystem built around the Payment Services Act (PSA), Securities and Futures Act (SFA), and MAS initiatives. In recent years, the COREDO team has implemented dozens of projects for company registration in Singapore and obtaining cryptocurrency service licenses, which has allowed us to develop effective market entry strategies.

Crypto Services License in Singapore

The Payment Services Act (PSA) has become a key tool for regulating digital assets, including cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, and tokenized assets. To obtain a cryptocurrency license in Singapore, you need to go through a multi-level Due Diligence procedure, prepare a corporate structure in Singapore, and implement KYC procedures fully compliant with FATF standards. In COREDO’s practice, we support clients at every stage, from application submission to interaction with MAS, ensuring transparency and risk minimization.

MAs pays special attention to AML compliance: companies must implement transaction monitoring systems, automated KYC procedures, and conduct regular AML risk assessments. This approach not only reduces regulatory risks but also increases the trust of banks and partners.

Stablecoin and Tokenized Asset Regulation

Since 2024, MAS has implemented a separate regulatory framework for issuers of single-currency stablecoins (SCS) denominated in G10 currencies. Unlike MiCA, where algorithmic stablecoins are banned, and the requirements for issuers are extremely stringent, Singapore operates on a principle of proportionality: regulation depends on issuance volume and consumer risk.
Solutions developed by COREDO allow clients to efficiently structure the issuance of tokenized assets and stablecoins under MAS requirements, maintaining business model flexibility. Separate licenses and fund reservation requirements are provided for crypto exchanges, ensuring investor protection and operational transparency.

MiCA Requirements for Crypto Business in the EU

Illustration for the section "MiCA Requirements for Crypto Business in the EU" in the article "Singapore instead of MiCA in 2025"

The introduction of MiCA 2025 marked a turning point for the crypto business in Europe. EU regulatory requirements now cover almost all aspects of virtual asset activities, from token issuance to the operation of crypto exchanges. However, COREDO’s practice shows that many companies face significant challenges in adapting to the new rules.

MiCA: Key Business Requirements

MiCA introduces a single license to operate in the entire EU market, theoretically simplifying entry into the European market. In practice, companies are forced to restructure internal processes, strengthen AML compliance, and implement new procedures for securities tokenization. It is important to consider the long transition period and the need for cross-border compliance, which increases project launch costs and timelines.

COREDO’s experience confirms: for certain business models (e.g., DeFi, multi-currency stablecoins, innovative payment services), MiCA requirements become a significant barrier, particularly regarding tokenization and crypto exchange regulation.

Ban on Algorithmic Stablecoins – New Requirements

MiCA unequivocally bans the issuance of algorithmic stablecoins and introduces strict reserve, disclosure, and corporate governance requirements for SCS (single-currency stablecoin) issuers. Unlike the Singaporean approach, where MAS assesses the risks of each issuer individually, MiCA sets uniform standards for the entire EU, limiting flexibility and innovation.
The COREDO team has repeatedly encountered cases where transitioning from the European to the Singaporean jurisdiction significantly reduced the regulatory burden and accelerated the launch of stablecoin projects.

AML and KYC: Singapore vs EU

Illustration for the section "AML and KYC: Singapore vs EU" in the article "Singapore instead of MiCA in 2025"

AML compliance is a key factor for the sustainable development of a crypto business. Singapore and the EU have different approaches to implementing FATF and CFT standards, directly impacting due diligence procedures and AML risk assessment.

AML for Crypto Business in Singapore

Singapore’s AML compliance is built on principles of transparency, automation, and integration with the banking infrastructure. Compliance for crypto exchanges in Singapore includes mandatory implementation of KYC procedures for all clients, regular risk reassessment, and the use of advanced technologies for transaction monitoring. Special requirements apply to foreign companies to confirm the source of funds and beneficiaries.
Projects implemented by the COREDO team have shown that implementing best practices in AML/CFT not only meets MAS requirements but also increases trust from partners and investors.

AML and KYC Requirements: Europe vs Asia

In the EU, AML/KYC requirements are regulated by the AMLD5 directive and MiCA, leading to the unification of procedures but reducing flexibility. In Asia, and especially in Singapore, the approach is more risk-oriented: companies are given the opportunity to independently develop internal AML policies considering the specifics of the business and client jurisdiction.
COREDO’s practice confirms: for international companies operating simultaneously in the EU and Asia, it is critically important to build cross-border compliance and adapt due diligence procedures to different regulatory standards.

Company Registration in Singapore for a Crypto Startup

Illustration for the section "Company Registration in Singapore for a Crypto Startup" in the article "Singapore instead of MiCA in 2025"

Company registration in Singapore is not only a quick market entry but also access to developed infrastructure, preferential taxation, and the high reputation of the jurisdiction. In recent years, the COREDO team has supported the registration of dozens of fintech and crypto startups, which allows us to highlight several key advantages.

How to Open a Fintech Company in Singapore

The process of registering legal entities in Asia, particularly in Singapore, is highly transparent: submission of documents to ACRA, charter approval, appointment of a director and corporate secretary, opening a bank account. For crypto startups, it is important to prepare a corporate structure in advance that meets MAS requirements and to implement innovative financial services such as security tokenization.
COREDO’s experience shows that a well-structured corporate setup in Singapore minimizes regulatory risks and simplifies further business scaling.

Access to Banking Services and Infrastructure

Singapore’s banking infrastructure is considered one of the most developed in the world. Obtaining a banking license in Singapore or a digital banking license opens up access to cross-border payments, investment products, and listing on the Singapore Exchange (SGX). For fintech companies, this is a strategic advantage, allowing rapid integration into the Asian ecosystem and attracting international investors.

Cross-Border Risks for International Companies

Illustration for the section "Cross-Border Risks for International Companies" in the article "Singapore instead of MiCA in 2025"

In the context of globalization, cross-border risks of crypto business come to the forefront. Companies face the need to comply with the requirements of several regulators at once, which requires a deep understanding of cross-border compliance and strategies for entering international markets.

MAS Regulation for Crypto Firms Working Abroad

MAS implements a comprehensive approach to regulating the cross-border activities of crypto firms: mandatory due diligence procedures, AML risk assessment, information exchange with foreign regulators. COREDO’s solutions allow clients to build processes that ensure compliance with MAS’s new rules for crypto assets and minimize overseas activity risks.

Special attention is paid to monitoring cross-border payments and verifying sources of funds, which is critically important for sustainable development and business scaling.

Issues with European and Asian Regulators

Simultaneous operation in the EU and Asia requires a prudent business structure and adaptation of compliance processes to different standards. COREDO’s practice has encountered cases where inconsistencies in due diligence procedures led to delays in token listing or account freezes.
For successful international market operations, it is important to pre-build a corporate structure that meets both MAS and MiCA requirements and implement international compliance standards.

MiCA and Regulation in Singapore: A Comparison

Criterion Singapore (MAS/PSA) EU (MiCA)
Licensing Flexible model, several types Single license for the entire EU
AML/KYC Strict requirements, FATF AMLD5 directive, MiCA
Stablecoins SCS, MAS regulation Ban on algorithmic, strict issuer requirements
Corporate Governance Corporate Governance Code European standards
Cross-Border Activity Support for innovations, regulatory sandbox Restrictions, lengthy transition period
Banking Infrastructure Developed, fintech licenses Depends on the country
Analyzing the differences, the solution developed at COREDO often involves a hybrid strategy: registering the head company in Singapore with subsequent obtaining of a cryptocurrency license, and for EU operations, creating subsidiary structures that comply with MiCA.

Crypto Startups in Singapore: Investment and Growth

Singapore not only offers favorable regulation but also creates unique conditions for scaling crypto businesses and attracting investments. Singapore’s investment attractiveness for fintech companies is confirmed by a high level of venture investments and active ecosystem development.

Business Scaling to Foreign Markets

Singaporean regulation opens opportunities for scaling crypto businesses in Asia and beyond. Through participation in international initiatives and support for innovative projects via a regulatory sandbox, companies can quickly test new products and enter G10 markets.
COREDO’s practice shows that a well-designed international market entry strategy not only minimizes cross-border risks but also significantly increases ROI.

ROI and Choosing Jurisdiction for Crypto Business

When choosing between Singapore and the EU, it’s important to consider not only direct licensing and compliance costs but also long-term sustainability, product-to-market speed, access to investors, and asset tokenization opportunities. At COREDO, we recommend using comprehensive ROI metrics, including regulatory risk assessment, capital cost, and corporate structure flexibility.

Practical Advice for Entrepreneurs

Based on years of experience, the COREDO team outlines the following steps for successful registration and launch of a crypto business in Singapore:
  • Conduct a preliminary analysis of the business model considering PSA and SFA requirements.
  • Prepare a corporate structure that meets MAS and Singapore Corporate Governance Code requirements.
  • Implement automated KYC procedures and transaction monitoring systems.
  • Develop internal AML/CFT policies considering the specifics of cross-border operations.
  • Conduct AML risk assessment using international best practices.
  • Choose a reliable consulting partner for registration and licensing support.
  • Regularly update compliance procedures in line with regulatory changes.

Singapore or MiCA: What to Choose in 2025?

The strategic choice of jurisdiction for crypto business in 2025: it’s a balance between regulatory flexibility, market entry speed, and long-term sustainability. COREDO’s practice confirms that registering a business in Singapore provides access to the rapidly growing fintech ecosystem of Asia, a transparent and predictable regulatory environment, as well as scaling and investment attraction opportunities.
For companies focused on international markets and innovative financial services, Singapore becomes not just an alternative but a strategic development center. On the other hand, to maximize benefits, it’s important to pre-build a corporate structure that meets MAS and MiCA requirements and implement comprehensive AML compliance.

Checklist for Decision Making:

  • Analyze the business model for PSA and MiCA compliance.
  • Evaluate licensing and compliance requirements in both jurisdictions.
  • Calculate ROI metrics considering regulatory risks and launch costs.
  • Prepare a corporate structure considering cross-border activity.
  • Implement AML/CFT best practices and KYC procedure automation.
  • Consult with COREDO experts to develop an individual strategy.
Choosing Singapore is an investment in the flexibility, innovation, and sustainability of your crypto business for years to come.

P2P transactions are direct transfers of funds between legal entities or individuals, bypassing traditional banking intermediaries. For international business, this is a tool for flexibility, speed, and cost optimization. However, with the increasing popularity of P2P transfers, the regulatory requirements in the EU, Asia, and Africa have become stricter, with regulators implementing new financial monitoring protocols, KYC for businesses, and anti-money laundering procedures.

Today, I, Nikita Veremeev, am sharing a practical guide based on the experience of COREDO in company registration in the EU, Asia, and Africa, obtaining financial licenses, implementing AML compliance, and supporting P2P operations. This article is not just an analysis but a strategic tool for leaders who want to not only avoid account blocks and sanctions but also scale business using P2P transfers legally and effectively. If you’re looking for answers about the legality of P2P transfers, financial monitoring, due diligence, and choosing the optimal jurisdiction, read to the end. Here you will find solutions tested in COREDO’s practice.

Legality of P2P Transfers: International and Local Regulation

Illustration for the section "Legality of P2P Transfers: International and Local Regulation" in the article "P2P Transactions - How to Comply with Laws and Operate Legally"
Legality of P2P transfers is becoming an increasingly relevant topic in the context of rapidly changing global financial regulation. Today, international and local regulations impose new requirements on P2P transactions, and their impact is particularly noticeable in EU countries, where updated standards will come into effect in 2025.

P2P Transactions in the EU: 2025 Requirements

In the European legal framework, the regulation of P2P transactions is based on a combination of EU directives, national laws, and FATF recommendations. The key provisions are enshrined in the 6th EU Directive on money laundering (6AMLD) and PSD2, which require companies to implement comprehensive AML compliance procedures and KYC for businesses. From 2025, stricter limits are expected on P2P transfers between companies and the mandatory identification of the ultimate beneficial owner (UBO) for cross-border payments.

The EU market is characterized by highly detailed requirements for the registration of companies for P2P operations: Licensing of platforms, mandatory verification of the source of funds, integration of automated financial monitoring systems, and mandatory reporting on suspicious transactions. Cross-border payments between EU residents and non-residents are subject to additional control, and P2P transfer limits are set both at the bank level and by national regulators. COREDO’s practice confirms that timely implementation of AML policies and automation of transaction monitoring allows not only avoiding account blocks but also speeding up due diligence processes during audits.

Thus, a unified legal approach and rapid development of technologies dictate the need for continuous improvement of regulatory mechanisms, which is especially evident when analyzing P2P transfers in Asian and African jurisdictions.

Regulation of P2P Transfers in Asia and Africa

In Asia and Africa, the regulation of P2P transfers is highly fragmented. For instance, in Singapore, registering a company that conducts P2P operations requires a local director and corporate secretary, and platform licensing is overseen by the Accounting and Corporate Regulatory Authority (ACRA). In the UAE and Thailand, there are specific requirements for AML compliance and financial monitoring, and in South Africa: strict control by the central bank.

Special attention is given to P2P transactions with cryptocurrency: exchanges are required to implement KYC/AML procedures, conduct verification of the source of funds, and integrate systems for detecting suspicious operations. The solution developed at COREDO for clients from Singapore and the UAE includes automation of counterpart checks and integration with global sanctions lists, minimizing risks of account blocks and inclusion in the registry of suspicious clients.

Liability for Illegal P2P Operations

Violation of regulatory requirements in the P2P transfer sphere entails serious consequences: financial sanctions, account blocks, inclusion in the registry of suspicious clients, and even criminal liability. In the EU and Asia, companies found engaged in illegal P2P operations or non-compliance with AML requirements may be fined amounts significantly exceeding the volume of disputed transactions.

The COREDO team has implemented cases where proper legal defense and preliminary Due Diligence allowed clients to avoid being placed on sanctions lists and restore access to corporate accounts after blocking. The key conclusion: only systematic work with AML procedures and transparent financial reporting protect the business from long-term consequences.

AML Compliance in P2P Transactions

Illustration for the section "AML Compliance in P2P Transactions" in the article "P2P Transactions - How to Comply with Laws and Operate Legally"
AML compliance in P2P transactions is becoming increasingly important as the volume of direct transfers between users and the development of cryptocurrency platforms grow. The implementation of AML and KYC procedures for businesses becomes especially significant to timely identify risks and prevent the legalization of illegal funds within peer-to-peer operations.

AML and KYC for Business

Implementing KYC/AML procedures is not a formality but a strategic necessity for companies working with P2P transfers between companies and international payments. The “Know Your Customer” (KYC) policy requires not only the identification of counterparts but also regular checking of their status in sanctions lists, analyzing ownership structure (identifying UBO), and confirming the legality of fund sources.

COREDO’s practice shows that automating KYC for businesses and integrating with global databases can speed up the verification of counterparts in P2P, reduce human error, and minimize the likelihood of conducting high-risk transactions. A compliance officer becomes a key figure in the internal control system, responsible for the implementation and regular updating of anti-money laundering procedures.

Financial Monitoring, How to Automate?

Modern transaction monitoring systems are based on the principles of transaction scoring and automated detection of suspicious operations. For P2P platforms and companies actively using P2P transfers, it is critically important to integrate tools that allow real-time tracking of anomalies, comparing operations with the client profile, and identifying potential cashing-out schemes or involvement of drop parties.

The solution developed at COREDO for Asian and European clients includes the implementation of automated P2P transaction monitoring modules, allowing not only compliance with FATF and national regulators’ requirements but also prompt reactions to changes in counterparty behavior. This approach reduces risks for legal entities and ensures transparency of financial flows.

Thus, effective automation of P2P transaction monitoring becomes an essential part of business protection and a key element in preventing bank account blocks.

How to Avoid Bank Account Blocking

Banks and financial institutions use complex algorithms to detect suspicious P2P operations: they analyze the frequency of transfers, payment structure, and the relevance of payment designations to the company’s actual activities. Criteria for suspicious operations include abnormal amounts, regular transfers to non-resident accounts, and using corporate accounts for personal needs.

If a company falls into the registry of suspicious clients, it is important to immediately initiate an internal audit, prepare a package of documents confirming the legality of fund origin, and seek legal support. COREDO’s experience shows that timely interaction with the bank and regulator, transparent reporting, and readiness for an independent due diligence allow restoring business reputation and avoiding long-term restrictions.

Legal Support for P2P Transfers Between Companies

Illustration for the section "Legal Support for P2P Transfers Between Companies" in the article "P2P Transactions - How to Comply with Laws and Operate Legally"
Legal support for P2P transfers between companies is a key element for lawful and safe organization of settlements in international business. Each stage of the P2P processes between legal entities requires considering the peculiarities of currency and tax control, compliance with reporting rules, and the correct choice of jurisdiction. We will further examine company registration for P2P transfers in the EU, Asia, and Africa, with a focus on current requirements and nuances.

Registration of Legal Entities for P2P in the EU, Asia, Africa

Choosing a jurisdiction for company registration focusing on P2P operations determines not only the tax burden but also the requirements for licensing, banking compliance, and financial reporting. In the EU, licensing for P2P platforms and exchangers is mandatory, and AML/KYC requirements correspond to FATF and 6AMLD standards. In Asia, for instance, in Singapore, company registration requires a local director and corporate secretary, with licensing regulated by ACRA.

In Africa (e.g., in South Africa), licensing for P2P operations is partially mandatory, and AML compliance requirements are defined by the central bank and national laws. COREDO’s practice confirms that a thorough analysis of regulatory requirements and preparation of a complete documentation package during company registration help avoid license denial and expedite corporate account opening.

Documents and Reporting on P2P Operations

Correct invoicing, payment orders, and contracts are the foundation for income legalization and minimizing tax risks in P2P transactions. Financial due diligence conducted at the deal conclusion stage allows identifying risks associated with the counterparty and preparing reports for tax authorities and auditors.

COREDO’s solution for European and Asian companies includes developing document templates that meet national regulators’ requirements and implementing automated systems for preparing financial reporting on P2P operations. This approach ensures transparency for investors and reduces the chance of account blocks.

These measures become especially relevant against the backdrop of businesses’ growing interest in using P2P cryptocurrency tools.

P2P Cryptocurrency for Business

Working with cryptocurrency exchanges and P2P platforms requires special attention to AML compliance and verification of fund sources. For the legal purchase of cryptocurrency through P2P, a legal entity must provide a full package of documents: regulatory documents, proof of registration, invoices, and also pass the KYC procedure on the exchange.

COREDO’s team has implemented projects for integrating AML services into P2P platforms for clients from the EU and Asia, allowing not only to legalize cryptocurrency deals but also to prevent accusations of cashing out and laundering criminal proceeds. It’s important: regular monitoring of operations and automation of due diligence become mandatory elements of a company’s compliance policy.

Business Risks: How to Operate Legally

Illustration for the section "Business Risks: How to Operate Legally" in the article "P2P Transactions - How to Comply with Laws and Operate Legally"
Business Risks are becoming increasingly significant in the context of digitalization and the growth of non-standard payment schemes. For entrepreneurs, it is crucial to understand how to operate legally, considering the features and dangers of modern transactions, especially when it comes to P2P operations. We will further examine key risks of P2P transactions for businesses and ways to minimize them.

Risks of P2P Transactions for Business

Key threats include fraudulent schemes, use of drop parties, high-risk transactions, leasing corporate cards, and operations between non-residents. These risks lead to account blocks, inclusion in the registry of suspicious clients, and financial sanctions.

COREDO’s practice shows that regular audits, implementation of systems for detecting suspicious operations, and staff training allow identifying and preventing fraudulent schemes at early stages.

Compliance Policy: What It Is and Why It Is Needed

Internal KYC/AML procedures, counterparty due diligence, transaction security protocols, and continuous staff training form the foundation of an effective compliance policy. A compliance officer must not only oversee the observance of procedures but also regularly update them according to legislative changes.

The solution implemented by COREDO for international clients includes the integration of automated monitoring services, development of checklists for due diligence, and regular training for staff. This approach protects businesses from charges of laundering through P2P and reduces the likelihood of tax claims.

Scaling Business Through P2P Transfers

To scale a business using P2P transfers, it’s crucial to choose a payment platform that meets the chosen jurisdiction’s requirements, integrate AML services, and ensure transaction transparency for investors. Automation of P2P transaction monitoring and the implementation of a financial control system allow for risk management in transactions with non-residents and preparing reports for auditors and tax authorities.

COREDO’s experience shows that transparency in P2P transactions, regular due diligence, and integration of compliance tools are essential conditions for sustainable growth and trust from investors and banks.

Conclusions and Recommendations for Business

Illustration for the section "Conclusions and Recommendations for Business" in the article "P2P Transactions - How to Comply with Laws and Operate Legally"

  • Implement comprehensive AML/KYC procedures and automated transaction monitoring systems.
  • Regularly update the compliance policy considering legislative changes in the EU, Asia, and Africa.
  • Conduct due diligence of counterparts before every P2P transaction, especially when working with non-residents and cryptocurrencies.
  • Document all P2P operations using invoices, payment orders, and supporting documentation.
  • Prepare financial reports on P2P operations for tax authorities and auditors in advance.
  • Provide staff training and appoint a competent compliance officer.
  • If placed in the registry of suspicious clients, initiate an internal audit and seek professional legal support.

If you would like to receive individual consultation on legal work with P2P transactions, company registration in the EU, Asia, or Africa, AML compliance implementation, and financial monitoring, the COREDO team is ready to offer solutions tested in practice and tailored to your business.

Jurisdiction P2P Licensing AML/KYC Requirements Transfer Limits Liability for Violations
EU Required for platforms and exchangers Strict, FATF, 6AMLD Set by banks and regulators High fines, account blocking
Asia (Thailand) Required for platforms SEC, local laws Restrictions for non-residents License sanctions, criminal liability
Africa (South Africa) Partially required Central Bank and AML requirements Limits by operation type Account blocking, business prohibition

This guide is the result of COREDO’s many years of work with international clients, real cases, and in-depth legislative analysis. Use it as a strategic tool for legal and effective work with P2P transactions in any jurisdiction.

In 2024, over 70% of crypto startups planning to enter the European market faced the need to revise their strategies due to new requirements of the MiCA regulation, the first comprehensive law on crypto-assets in the EU. According to ESMA, only 18% of companies applying for CASP (Crypto Asset Service Provider) status successfully passed the preliminary compliance audit in pilot jurisdictions. This is more than just statistics; it’s a signal to rethink the approach to registering legal entities in the EU and licensing crypto services.

Why are so many players unprepared for MiCA? What risks does MiCA implementation pose for international crypto companies? Why are even large projects starting to look towards El Salvador, a jurisdiction where cryptocurrency regulation is based on principles of accessibility and speed? How to choose a strategy to avoid being left out in a market undergoing consolidation and tightening compliance requirements?

In this article, I will share the experience of the COREDO team, which has been supporting international projects in the EU, Asia, and the CIS since 2016, and show how tasks of company registration, obtaining financial licenses, implementing AML for crypto business, and strategic compliance planning are practically solved under MiCA conditions and alternative regimes. If you want to understand how to prepare for MiCA implementation in 2025, evaluate the advantages of registering a company in El Salvador, or choose the optimal jurisdiction for scaling: read to the end. Here you will find not only risk analysis but also specific tools for decision-making.

Crypto Asset Regulation under MiCA

Illustration for the section "Crypto Asset Regulation under MiCA" in the article "MiCA is too complex - look at El Salvador"
Crypto Asset Regulation under MiCA creates a new regulatory environment for working with digital assets in EU countries. Thanks to these rules, a unified system of requirements arises, increasing transparency, protecting investors, and establishing obligations for crypto companies. Let’s further examine what specific requirements MiCA imposes on participants in the EU crypto market.

MiCA Requirements for Crypto Companies in the EU

MiCA regulation introduces strict standards for all participants in the crypto asset market in Europe. For companies applying for CASP status, the key requirements are:

  • Licensing of crypto services: To enter the EU market, it is required to obtain a license issued by the national regulator and approved by ESMA. The process includes a comprehensive review of the corporate structure, sources of funding, and business model.
  • AML for crypto business: Implementing anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing (AML/CFT) procedures becomes mandatory. Companies must develop and maintain internal CDD (customer Due Diligence) policies, identify ultimate beneficiaries, implement KYC procedures, and ensure transparency of operations.
  • Whitepaper for tokens: Issuing utility tokens, ARTs, or EMTs requires preparing a formalized whitepaper revealing technical details, risks, investor protection mechanisms, and compliance with MiCA requirements.
  • Corporate governance: MiCA imposes requirements on corporate structure transparency, regular auditing, and reporting, especially relevant for companies working with crypto assets and stablecoins.
  • Travel Rule: All CASPs are obligated to implement a mechanism for transferring client information for cross-border crypto asset transfers, requiring integration with international FATF standards.
The practice of COREDO shows that preparing for licensing under MiCA requires not only a deep understanding of regulatory requirements but also restructuring internal processes: from developing compliance policies to integrating automated transaction monitoring systems.

MiCA Implementation: Challenges and Risks

MiCA regulation: is not just a set of formal requirements. For most companies, the key challenge becomes the compliance cost: costs of audits, legal support, AML/KYC implementation, operation monitoring automation, and whitepaper preparation. According to COREDO’s estimates, for an average crypto service in the EU, the cost of full MiCA compliance implementation can reach 250-500 thousand euros in the first year, with market entry timelines ranging from 6 to 18 months.

Special attention should be paid to risks for small businesses. High costs and complexity of procedures lead to market consolidation: small players are forced to either merge or leave the market. This is confirmed by COREDO’s practice when supporting startups in the Czech Republic and Estonia, where many projects abandon licensing in favor of alternative jurisdictions or pivot models.

Among the long-term consequences of the MiCA regulation, there is an increase in operational costs, stricter corporate governance requirements, and the risk of small players exiting the market. For entrepreneurs, this means the need for strategic compliance planning and evaluating the ROI of MiCA implementation.

MiCA and AML Rules for Crypto Business

MiCA regulation integrates with EU directives on AML/CFT, making anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing a central element of cryptocurrency regulation in Europe. For CASPs and other market participants, this means:

  • Mandatory implementation of customer due diligence (CDD) procedures, continuous transaction monitoring, and identifying suspicious activities.
  • Implementation of the Travel Rule for all cross-border crypto asset transfers.
  • Increased requirements for transparency of operations and investor protection.
The COREDO team has implemented projects for introducing automated AML systems for crypto exchanges in the EU, which allowed clients not only to comply with MiCA requirements but also to reduce the risk of account blocking and fines from regulators.

Cryptobusiness Regulation in El Salvador

Illustration for the section "Cryptobusiness Regulation in El Salvador" in the article "MiCA is too complex - look at El Salvador"
Cryptobusiness Regulation in El Salvador today stands out with one of the most innovative and open approaches in the world. The development of the legislative base, the introduction of special licenses, and the focus on AML procedures have created a unique environment here for the legalization and protection of cryptocurrency services. This is reflected in both licensing requirements and AML regulation for market participants.

Licensing and AML in El Salvador

Unlike the EU, where MiCA regulation sets a complex multi-level structure, El Salvador offers a maximally simple model for licensing crypto services. The CNAD (National Commission for Digital Assets) regulator issues VASP (Virtual Asset Service Provider) licenses within 1-3 months with a minimal document package:

  • Charter documents of the company, information about beneficiaries, and KYC procedures.
  • Description of the business model and basic AML policies that comply with FATF standards but without excessive bureaucracy.
  • No obligatory requirements for whitepapers and corporate governance.
A real case from COREDO: a client from Singapore completed legal entity registration and obtained a VASP license in 6 weeks, integrating KYC/AML procedures with the help of a local provider. This approach allows for the swift launch of a business and entering international markets.

Company Registration in El Salvador: Pros and Cons

The key advantage of registering legal entities in El Salvador is speed and low costs. Government support of crypto business, the absence of complex reporting, and flexibility of AML procedures make the jurisdiction attractive for startups and small companies. However, there are also limitations:

  • The jurisdiction’s reputation still lags behind the EU and the UK, which can complicate access to banking services in Europe.
  • For cross-border operations and working with institutional investors, additional legal support will be required.
  • Risks for small and medium businesses are associated with the uncertainty of international recognition of licenses and the need for integration with global AML standards.
COREDO’s experience shows that for companies focused on rapid scaling and innovations, El Salvador becomes a real alternative to the EU, provided there is competent legal support.

Comparison of Jurisdictions: EU, Asia, Africa

For international crypto projects, choosing a jurisdiction is a balance between compliance requirements, market entry speed, and opportunities for innovations. In Asia (Singapore, Hong Kong), digital assets regulation is based on transparency and technological neutrality principles, but it requires local presence and KYC/AML implementation at a global standard level.

In Africa (Mauritius, South Africa), there is regulatory flexibility and innovation support, but availability of banking services and international recognition of licenses are limited. COREDO practice confirms: for crypto startups targeting the global market, diversification of corporate structures is optimal – registering a parent company in the EU or Singapore with subsidiaries in El Salvador or Africa.

MiCA or Regulation in El Salvador – What to Choose?

Criterion MiCA (EU) El Salvador
License Requirements Strict, lengthy process, high cost Quick, simple, low costs
AML/CTF Strict, under ESMA and FATF control FATF standards, but simpler implementation
Whitepaper Requirements Formalized, mandatory disclosure of information Minimal, flexible
Investor Protection High level, strict control Basic requirements
Corporate Governance Formalized, reporting, audit Minimal requirements
Jurisdiction Reputation High, access to EU banks Medium, limited access to banks
Opportunities for Innovation Limited by compliance High flexibility
Risks for Small Business High costs, market exit risks Startup accessibility
Market Entry Timelines 6-18 months 1-3 months
This comparative analysis, based on COREDO cases, allows entrepreneurs to evaluate not only direct costs and timelines but also strategic risks related to jurisdiction choice, investor protection, and opportunities for innovation.

Choice of Jurisdiction and Preparation for MiCA

Illustration for the section "Choice of Jurisdiction and Preparation for MiCA" in the article "MiCA is too complex - look at El Salvador"
Choice of jurisdiction and preparation for MiCA becomes one of the key stages for crypto projects planning to operate in the European Union. The legislation establishes unified requirements for issuers and service providers, so a competent choice of country of registration and early preparation for the new MiCA standards determines how quickly and efficiently the business will adapt to the new rules.

In the conditions of approaching implementation of new standards, it is important to determine specific steps for successful integration of MiCA requirements in advance.

MiCA Implementation: What Needs to Be Done?

COREDO’s experience shows that successful adaptation to MiCA regulation requires a phased approach:

  1. Conduct an internal audit of corporate structures, business processes, and existing compliance policies.
  2. Develop a MiCA implementation strategy: identify key risk zones, assess compliance costs, plan AML/KYC automation.
  3. Prepare whitepaper and documentation in accordance with MiCA requirements for the business.
  4. Establish partnerships with regulators and professional associations for quick information exchange and obtaining clarifications on complex issues.
The COREDO team supports clients at all stages, from initial risk assessment to integration of automated compliance solutions.
Thus, after implementing all stages, consideration of alternative jurisdictions for business development and scaling becomes relevant.

Alternative Jurisdictions for Business

Deciding on jurisdiction choice should be based on an analysis of the business model, target markets, and compliance readiness. Alternative jurisdictions (El Salvador, Singapore, Mauritius) become optimal if:

  • Your business model requires quick market entry and cost minimization.
  • The project is focused on innovations and flexibility, not on institutional investors in the EU.
  • There is a need to diversify corporate structures and reduce operational costs.
COREDO’s practice shows that for many crypto startups, a multi-jurisdictional presence strategy is effective: registration of a legal entity in the EU to work with European investors and parallel licensing in El Salvador or Asia for global operations.

How to Evaluate Compliance ROI?

Evaluating MiCA compliance ROI involves not only analyzing direct costs but also forecasting long-term consequences for companies:

  • Operational expenses: MiCA compliance implementation increases costs by 20-40% in the first year but reduces the risk of fines and blockages.
  • Long-term planning: Companies investing in compliance automation gain a competitive advantage by reducing costs and speeding up processes.
  • Innovation and market diversification: A multi-jurisdictional presence strategy allows maintaining flexibility and adapting to regulatory changes.
COREDO’s recommendation: integrate compliance ROI evaluation into strategic planning and use automation tools to minimize costs.

Conclusions and Recommendations for Business

Illustration for the section "Conclusions and Recommendations for Business" in the article "MiCA is too complex - look at El Salvador"
Checklist for choosing a jurisdiction:

  • Evaluate licensing and compliance requirements in each jurisdiction.
  • Analyze access to banking services and jurisdiction reputation.
  • Calculate timelines and costs for legal entity registration and obtaining a license.
  • Consider risks for small businesses and opportunities for innovation.

Algorithm for preparing for MiCA:

  1. Internal audit of processes and structures.
  2. Development of compliance strategy and automation of AML/KYC.
  3. Preparation of whitepapers and information disclosure according to MiCA.
  4. Interaction with regulators and professional associations.

Tips for reducing compliance costs:

  • Utilize automated solutions for transaction monitoring and CDD.
  • Engage external experts for audits and process optimization.
  • Diversify corporate structures to reduce operational costs.

Recommendations for jurisdiction diversification:

  • Consider a multi-jurisdictional model with registration in the EU, El Salvador, and Asia.
  • Utilize the advantages of each jurisdiction for tax optimization and market access.

Key Questions for Entrepreneurs

Illustration for the section "Key Questions for Entrepreneurs" in the article "MiCA is too complex - look at El Salvador"
What strategic risks does MiCA implementation pose for international crypto companies?

The main risks relate to rising compliance costs, tightening of AML/KYC, the need for comprehensive audits of corporate structures, and the risk of small players exiting the market. COREDO’s solution includes strategic compliance planning and jurisdiction diversification.

How does MiCA affect the costs and timelines for market entry in the EU for crypto business?

Licensing timelines increase to 6–18 months, compliance costs can amount to up to 500 thousand euros in the first year. COREDO’s practice: process automation and document preparation shorten timelines and costs.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of regulation in El Salvador compared to MiCA?

El Salvador offers quick registration, low costs, and AML flexibility, but is limited in access to banking services and international investors. For startups: it is an opportunity to quickly enter the market, for large-scale projects – a tool for diversification.

How to ensure compliance with the Travel Rule and AML requirements within MiCA?

Implementation of automated solutions for transaction monitoring, integration with international FATF standards, regular audits, and staff training are key steps implemented by the COREDO team.

What new requirements for whitepapers and information disclosure does MiCA impose?

A whitepaper must include a full token description, investor protection mechanisms, risks, fund usage order, and MiCA regulation compliance. A solution developed at COREDO involves comprehensive documentation preparation in accordance with ESMA requirements.

How does MiCA impact corporate governance of crypto companies?

MiCA requires transparency of structures, regular audits, and reporting, which increases investor trust but also increases administrative burden. COREDO’s experience involves implementing flexible corporate governance models considering business specifics.

If you need to choose a jurisdiction, prepare a company for MiCA regulation, or minimize risks of implementing new standards, the COREDO team is ready to offer comprehensive solutions based on international experience and deep market knowledge.

In 2024, there are more than 10 foreign companies per inhabitant in Ireland, and the volume of foreign direct investment exceeds €1.2 trillion, which is more than the GDP of many European countries. Over 1,600 transnational corporations, including Google, Microsoft, Pfizer, Meta, Apple, and Intel, have chosen Ireland as their European headquarters.

Why? It’s not just about the low corporate tax rate—it’s about strategic location, unique investment climate, and flexible corporate structures.

Ireland is the only English-speaking jurisdiction in the EU after Brexit, which is critical for companies targeting the international market. The country is part of the European Union and the European Economic Area (EEA), providing direct access to markets with over 450 million consumers.

The practice of COREDO confirms: after the UK’s exit from the EU, the Irish jurisdiction became the main gateway to the Eurozone for companies from Asia and the CIS, focused on export-import operations, fintech, and IT services.

# Economic and Political Stability as a Key to Long-Term Investments

Ireland’s macroeconomic indicators: among the best in Europe: GDP growth rates consistently exceed the European averages, unemployment is below 5%, and public debt is one of the most manageable in the region. Legislation is predictable and transparent, and the judicial system is built on the British common law model, which facilitates the resolution of corporate disputes.

Brexit has increased Ireland’s attractiveness for international business: companies that previously operated through London are massively moving their European structures to Dublin to maintain access to EU markets and Eurozone financial instruments. A solution developed by COREDO for one of the largest Asian fintech holdings allowed the client not only to minimize cross-border payment costs but also to ensure legal protection of intellectual property according to European standards.

If you are looking for a jurisdiction with a stable economy, political neutrality, and the most transparent regulatory environment: I recommend reading the article to the end. I will detail the key steps of company registration in Ireland, taxation features, compliance, and innovation support, and provide practical recommendations for entering EU markets.

Company Registration in Ireland – Steps

Illustration for the "Company Registration in Ireland - Steps" section in the article "Ireland - a Popular Jurisdiction for International Business"

# Step-by-Step Guide on Company Registration in Ireland

Company registration in Ireland is a process that requires strategic planning and deep understanding of local requirements. COREDO’s experience shows: success begins with the choice of the optimal organizational-legal form and competent construction of the management structure.

Main registration steps:

  • Choosing a unique name and reserving it at the Companies Registration Office (CRO).
  • Preparation of founding documents: Memorandum and Articles of Association, information about directors (at least one EEA resident), secretary, and shareholders.
  • Minimum authorized capital – from €1, making the entry threshold accessible for startups and international groups.
  • Opening a bank account in an Irish bank, preparing KYC documents, and confirming the source of funds.
  • Registering with tax authorities and obtaining a VAT number (if necessary).
  • Entering the company into the register of beneficial owners to ensure transparency.
For non-residents, several features apply: the appointment of a local director from the EEA is required, as well as the provision of a legal address in Ireland.

The COREDO team has implemented dozens of projects on registering holding companies for clients from the CIS and Asia, optimizing the ownership structure taking into account EU transparency and compliance requirements.

# Choosing the Organizational-Legal Form: LTD, PLC, Holding

In Ireland, the most popular forms are:

  • Private Company Limited by Shares (LTD): optimal for small and medium-sized businesses, does not require the publication of financial statements, and is flexible in management structure.
  • Public Limited Company (PLC): suitable for large projects and going public, requires stricter accounting and a minimum capital of €25,000.
  • Holding Company: used for managing international assets, tax optimization, and intellectual property protection.

COREDO’s practice confirms: for IT companies and fintech, LTD with a flexible management structure and nominee services often becomes the optimal choice. For international groups—a holding structure with subsidiaries in various EU jurisdictions.

# Legal Support for Business in Ireland: Why It Is Needed

Legal support is not just a formality but a strategic risk management and compliance tool. The COREDO team supports clients at all stages: from registration and licensing to the construction of a corporate governance system and the introduction of AML/KYC procedures.

This approach ensures not only compliance with regulatory requirements but also business resilience to external and internal challenges.

Corporate Tax and Incentives in Ireland

Illustration for the "Corporate Tax and Incentives in Ireland" section in the article "Ireland - a Popular Jurisdiction for International Business"

# Corporate Tax Rates and Tax Incentives

Ireland is known for having one of the lowest corporate tax rates in the EU, 12.5% on trading income. A rate of 25% applies to passive income (e.g., interest and royalties). For companies investing in R&D, innovations, and IT, additional tax incentives apply: refund of up to 25% of research expenses, patent regimes, and reduced rates for income from intellectual property.

A solution developed by COREDO for a European SaaS startup allowed the client to reduce the effective tax burden to 8% using the patent regime and incentives for innovative companies. Compared to France (28%) and Germany (30%+), the corporate tax in Ireland remains one of the most competitive in the region.

# Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements and Their Application

Ireland has signed Double Taxation Avoidance Agreements (DTA) with more than 70 countries, including the USA, Japan, South Korea, China, India, most EU and CIS countries. This allows minimizing the risk of double taxation in cross-border operations and efficiently structuring international holdings.

For example, the agreement between Ireland and the USA allows IT companies from Asia and the CIS to receive income from American clients through an Irish structure with minimal tax costs. COREDO’s practice shows: proper application of DTA and transfer pricing mechanisms allows reducing fiscal risks and increasing business transparency for investors.

# Taxation Features for Foreign and Holding Companies

For foreign companies, the key issues are defining tax residency, intellectual property protection, and transfer pricing optimization. The Irish jurisdiction allows registering holding companies that own assets and intellectual property worldwide, using preferential tax regimes and international reporting standards (IFRS).

In one of the COREDO cases, a structure was implemented for an Asian pharmaceutical group in which the Irish holding managed the IP portfolio and licensed technologies to European and American subsidiaries, ensuring not only tax efficiency but also asset protection at the EU level.

Thus, Ireland combines flexible tax regimes for businesses and international agreements, forming a reliable basis for further consideration of AML compliance and financial monitoring issues.

AML Compliance and Financial Monitoring in Ireland

Illustration for the "AML Compliance and Financial Monitoring in Ireland" section in the article "Ireland - a Popular Jurisdiction for International Business"

# Requirements for KYC and Financial Monitoring for New Companies

Since 2023, Ireland has introduced updated KYC standards and financial monitoring in line with the 6th EU Anti-Money Laundering Directive (AML). For new companies, it is mandatory to:

  • Verify all ultimate beneficial owners (UBO) and directors.
  • Confirm the source of funds and business reputation.
  • Register in the beneficial owners register.
  • Build an internal transaction monitoring system.

Particular attention is given to non-residents: banks and payment institutions require an extended set of documents and may conduct an in-depth Due Diligence. COREDO’s experience shows that preliminary preparation of a KYC profile and a transparent ownership structure significantly accelerates account opening and minimizes rejection risks.

# Best Practices in AML and Risk Prevention

Implementing internal AML/CTF policies, regular staff training, automating transaction monitoring, and interacting with regulators are mandatory elements for financial companies and holdings. In a recent COREDO project for a fintech company from Singapore, an electronic document management and automatic compliance control system was implemented, allowing not only to meet the Central Bank of Ireland’s requirements but also to enhance investor trust.

Liability for AML requirements violations — up to criminal liability, and fines may reach millions of euros. Therefore, a comprehensive approach to compliance and due diligence is not an option but a necessity for any international business in Ireland.

Thus, competent preparation for adhering to new KYC and AML standards serves as a foundation for successfully launching a business, after which it is worth considering available state support measures and innovative opportunities for companies in Ireland.

State Support and Innovation: What is Available to Businesses

Illustration for the "State Support and Innovation: What is Available to Businesses" section in the article "Ireland - a Popular Jurisdiction for International Business"

# State Grants and Programs for Startups

Ireland is one of the world leaders in the number of government support programs for startups and innovative companies. Among the key tools:
  • Enterprise Ireland grants for R&D, entering foreign markets, hiring specialists.
  • Acceleration and incubation programs in innovation clusters (e.g., Dublin Tech Cluster, Cork Innovation Hub).
  • Tax incentives for investors (SURE, EII) and startups (Start-Up Refunds for Entrepreneurs).

A solution implemented by COREDO for a fintech startup from the Czech Republic allowed the client to receive a grant of €150,000 and access to venture capital under the Enterprise Ireland program, ensuring a quick entrance to EU markets and business scaling.

# Venture Investments and Innovation Clusters

The startup ecosystem in Ireland includes more than 250 venture funds and business angels, with investment volumes in innovative industries (IT, fintech, pharma, biotech) annually exceeding €1.5 billion. Innovation clusters and business incubators provide not only financing but also mentoring support, access to infrastructure, and international partners.

For companies focused on export-import operations, Ireland offers unique opportunities through working with global logistics and financial hubs in the EU. COREDO’s practice shows that startups choosing the Irish jurisdiction gain not only access to venture capital but also support in intellectual property issues, licensing, and entry into international markets.

Business Risks and Compliance in Ireland

Illustration for the "Business Risks and Compliance in Ireland" section in the article "Ireland - a Popular Jurisdiction for International Business"

# Main Risks for Foreign Investors

Despite the obvious advantages, doing business in Ireland involves several risks:

  • Currency fluctuations (especially when dealing with non-European contractors).
  • Strengthening regulatory requirements in the field of AML and KYC.
  • Possible changes in tax legislation within the framework of global EU and OECD initiatives.
  • The need for fiscal transparency and disclosure of beneficial owners.

The COREDO team recommends building a corporate risk management system according to international standards (ISO 31000, COSO) and regularly conducting a compliance audit.

# Comparison of Ireland with Other EU Jurisdictions

Parameter Ireland Luxembourg Cyprus Estonia
Corporate Tax 12.5% 24.94% 12.5% 20%
English-speaking Environment Yes No Yes No
EU/EEA Membership Yes Yes Yes Yes
Access to Venture Capital High Medium Medium Medium
Compliance Transparency High High Medium High
Grants and State Support Above Average High Medium High
Reporting Requirements IFRS, strict IFRS, strict IFRS, medium IFRS, electronic

COREDO’s practice confirms: for companies focused on international expansion, Ireland often turns out to be the most balanced jurisdiction in terms of tax, legal, and infrastructure factors.

Business in Ireland: How to Open and Operate

# Checklist for Entrepreneurs: From Registration to Market Entry

  1. Assess strategic goals and choose the optimal corporate structure (LTD, holding, PLC).
  2. Prepare founding documents and a KYC package for all participants.
  3. Reserve a name and submit documents to CRO.
  4. Open a bank account in Ireland, ensure source transparency.
  5. Register with tax authorities, obtain a VAT number.
  6. Implement internal AML/KYC policies and an electronic document management system.
  7. Register in the beneficial owners register.
  8. Consider opportunities for grants, acceleration, or venture funding.
  9. Ensure the protection of intellectual property and set up a corporate governance system.
  10. Regularly update compliance procedures and monitor legislative changes.

# Recommendations for Choosing a Consulting and Legal Partner

Choosing a partner is a key success factor. Evaluate:

  • Experience in registering legal entities in the EU and supporting holding structures.
  • Expertise in AML compliance and financial monitoring.
  • Depth of understanding of international reporting standards and due diligence.
  • Practical cases and client recommendations.

The COREDO team supports clients at all stages: from strategic planning and registration to entering EU markets, obtaining licenses, and building a corporate governance system. In one case for a fintech group from Asia, a comprehensive structure with an Irish holding, and subsidiaries in the Czech Republic and Slovakia was implemented, ensuring not only tax optimization but also resilience to regulatory risks.

Frequently Asked Questions and Key Conclusions

# Brief Insights and Recommendations

Advantage of Ireland Description
Low Corporate Tax 12.5% on trading income, incentives for R&D and IT
Access to EU Markets Direct entry into the Eurozone and the UK post-Brexit
Flexibility of Corporate Structures LTD, holdings, nominee services, English-speaking environment
Innovation Ecosystem Grants, accelerators, venture funds, startup support
High Level of Compliance Transparency, investment protection, modern AML/KYC procedures
Reporting Transparency IFRS, strict corporate governance standards
Regulation Prospects: Ireland continues to enhance transparency and fiscal discipline, implement new compliance standards, and support innovative industries. The jurisdiction suits companies aiming for long-term expansion, asset protection, and access to venture capital.

# FAQ: Answers to Popular Questions

What are the actual costs and ROI when opening a company in Ireland?
Registration of an LTD starts at €1,200, with annual support from €2,000. ROI depends on the industry: for IT and fintech, the return on investment often occurs as early as the 2-3rd year thanks to tax benefits and access to EU markets.

What difficulties might arise in compliance and AML checks in Irish banks?
Main difficulties: transparency of structure requirements, source of funds confirmation, and KYC for non-residents. The solution involves prior preparation of a full document package and implementation of internal AML policies.

How to ensure long-term asset and intellectual property protection through the Irish structure?
Use a holding company for IP ownership, implement patent and licensing regimes, and execute international investment protection agreements. COREDO’s practice confirms: such a strategy minimizes risks and enhances investment appeal.

If you are considering Ireland as a jurisdiction for international expansion, the COREDO team is ready to offer solutions that take into account the specifics of your business, industry risks, and modern market requirements.

In 2024, 86% of European companies encountering trademark infringements reported direct financial losses and decreased customer trust. Even more telling: according to EUIPO data, 1 in 4 startups in the EU face legal barriers when expanding into new markets precisely due to weak brand protection.
Why do even experienced entrepreneurs, investing in innovation and marketing, lose ground due to underestimating the role of intellectual property in the EU? How can costly mistakes be avoided and trademark registration turned into a strategic advantage?

Over the years, the COREDO team has often observed how timely trademark registration in the European Union becomes a key success factor for international companies, IT startups, and e-commerce projects. In the rapidly digitizing environment, cross-border competition, and tightening compliance procedures, intelligent management of intellectual assets is not just a formality but a tool for business growth and protection.

In this article, I will thoroughly discuss the most pressing issues faced by entrepreneurs from Europe, Asia, and the CIS: from choosing a registration strategy to the subtleties of legal protection and tax planning. If you want to understand how EU trademark registration can become your competitive advantage and how to avoid typical pitfalls: read on. Here you will find not only answers but also practical tools, proven by COREDO’s experience.

Trademark in the EU: what it is and why it is needed

Illustration for the section "Trademark in the EU: what it is and why it is needed" in the article "Trademarks in the EU - answering popular questions - 2025"

European trademark: what is it and why?

The European Union Trade Mark (EUTM) is a unified legal tool that provides legal protection for a trademark in all EU countries through a centralized procedure in EUIPO. Unlike national registration, EUTM ensures commercial identity protection and provides cross-border brand protection, which is crucial for companies operating in multiple jurisdictions.

COREDO’s practice confirms: for international holdings, IT companies, and startups aimed at scaling, the registration of a European trademark becomes the foundation of brand strategy and effective protection of intellectual assets. This approach minimizes the risks of copying, parallel imports, and unfair competition.

Registration of a trademark in the EU, advantages

  • Cross-border protection: One registered EUTM provides legal protection in all 27 EU countries, significantly reducing the costs of legal support and monitoring violations.
  • Simplification of entering EU markets: Centralized registration through EUIPO allows quick launching of new products and services without spending time on separate national procedures.
  • Increase in brand value: According to recent WIPO research, having a registered trademark in the EU increases the company’s investment attractiveness and eases M&A transactions, franchising, and licensing.
  • Flexibility for multi-product companies: Strategic reserving of Nice Classification classes allows protecting not only current but also future business directions.
COREDO’s completed projects show: a well-structured IP rights portfolio management strategy not only protects the brand but also monetizes intellectual assets through licensing and cross-border agreements.

Thus, EUTM registration becomes the foundation for successful brand promotion in Europe and optimization of IP asset management.

Trademark registration in the EU: step by step

Illustration for the section "Trademark registration in the EU: step by step" in the article "Trademarks in the EU - answering popular questions - 2025"

How to register a trademark in the EU?

The procedure of trademark registration in the European Union includes several key stages:
  1. Search and preliminary uniqueness check: Using EUIPO tools and international databases helps identify potential conflicts and minimize opposition risks. COREDO’s experience shows that quality due diligence TM at this stage reduces the likelihood of refusal by 40%.
  2. Choosing Nice Classification classes for the EU: Classification according to the Nice Classification of Goods and Services determines the scope of legal protection. For multi-product and IT companies, it’s crucial to strategically reserve classes considering future expansion.
  3. Preparation and application submission: The application is submitted through the EUIPO electronic portal, including applicant details, trademark image, list of Nice Classification classes, and supporting documents.
  4. Examination and publication: After a formal check, the application is published in the EUIPO bulletin. This marks the start of a three-month opposition period.
  5. Receiving electronic registration certificate: In the absence of opposition or successful resolution of disputes, an electronic certificate is issued, confirming legal protection in all EU countries.
For IT companies and startups, the COREDO team has developed special algorithms for selecting Nice Classification classes, considering the specifics of SaaS, mobile applications, and digital services.

How much does trademark registration cost?

  • Cost of trademark registration: The basic EUIPO fee for submitting an application is 850 euros for one class, plus 50 euros for the second class and 150 euros for each subsequent class. Additional expenses may arise if legal support or filing objections are needed.
  • Trademark validity period: The European trademark is valid for 10 years with the possibility of unlimited renewal for similar periods upon payment of the corresponding fees.
  • Renewal of trademark in the EU: The renewal application is submitted through the EUIPO personal account no earlier than 6 months before the expiration date.

Application submission and opposition period

After submission, the application is published in the official EUIPO bulletin. Within three months, any interested parties may file opposition if they believe that the registration infringes upon their rights.
During this period, it is extremely important to promptly respond to notifications and prepare a reasoned position – here, COREDO’s experience in handling opposition procedures is particularly in demand.

Grounds for refusal and trademark opposition

Illustration for the section "Grounds for refusal and trademark opposition" in the article "Trademarks in the EU - answering popular questions - 2025"

Absolute and relative grounds for refusal

According to EUIPO practice, the refusal of trademark registration in the EU may be due to:
  • Absolute grounds: lack of distinctiveness, overly generic or descriptive designation, similarity to state symbols, violation of public order.
  • Relative grounds: existence of previously registered trademarks with a high degree of similarity, infringement of third-party rights, overlap with Nice Classification classes.

A common mistake companies make is incorrect choice of Nice Classification classes or trying to register a designation already occupied in neighboring markets. The solution developed at COREDO includes automated checks across all relevant databases and analysis of court precedents on TM in the EU.

What to do in case of third-party objections

If opposition is filed against your application, it is important to:
  • Promptly analyze the grounds for objection and gather evidence of good faith use or distinctive character.
  • Prepare a motivated response and, if necessary, enter negotiations with the opponent.
  • In case of refusal, initiate an appeal procedure in the EUIPO Board of Appeal or take the case to the EU Court.
COREDO’s practice shows that a sound legal strategy and quality document preparation allow for successful challenges to refusals and protection of TM rights even in complex situations.

Trademark registration: national, European, international

Illustration for the section "Trademark registration: national, European, international" in the article "Trademarks in the EU - answering popular questions - 2025"

When to choose a national or European trademark

Criterion National registration European Trademark (EUTM) International registration (Madrid Protocol)
Coverage One country All EU countries Up to 100+ countries
Cost Low Medium High (depends on the number of countries)
Review period 6-12 months 4-8 months 12-18 months
Opposition period 2-3 months 3 months 12-18 months
Strategic advantages Local protection Centralized management Global expansion

For companies operating in only one country, national registration is more practical. If expansion into several EU countries is planned or cross-border licensing is required, EUTM becomes the optimal choice. For multi-product companies, it’s important to strategically reserve Nice Classification classes with growth prospects in mind.

Trademark registration under the Madrid Protocol

The Madrid Protocol allows obtaining trademark protection in over 100 countries, including the EU, through one application. On the other hand, it’s important to consider that refusal in one country may not affect registration in others, and the cost of the procedure depends on the number of chosen jurisdictions.
COREDO’s experience shows that for global brands and franchising networks, international registration is a key tool for scaling and cross-border protection.

Trademark Protection in Europe

Illustration for the section "Trademark Protection in Europe" in the article "Trademarks in the EU - answering popular questions - 2025"

How to protect a trademark from copying

Modern tools for monitoring trademark rights violations in the EU include automated counterfeit search systems and digital enforcement: addressing violations on e-commerce platforms and social networks. Solutions implemented by COREDO for international clients allow tracking unauthorized brand use in real-time and promptly initiating legal protection.

Recent court precedents confirm: companies investing in monitoring automation and establishing compliance procedures for TM significantly reduce reputational and financial risks.

Franchising or license: what to choose?

A registered European trademark opens up wide opportunities for franchising, licensing, and cross-border agreements. For M&A transactions, transfer, or sale of TM rights, notarization and thorough due diligence are required. COREDO practice shows that quality document preparation and EUIPO procedure compliance significantly speed up deals and minimize tax risks.

Trademark protection in e-commerce and D2C

In the e-commerce and D2C segment, trademark protection becomes especially important: speed of response to violations, integration of TM into the marketing strategy, and collaboration with platforms for digital enforcement are critical. For IT companies and startups, the COREDO team recommends the implementation of automated monitoring systems and regular updating of the IP rights portfolio, considering new business directions.

Trademark Management and Taxes

Trademark valuation: due diligence and cost

Trademark due diligence includes checking legal purity, analyzing court disputes, assessing parallel import risks, and compliance procedures. Brand valuation is made considering market position, reputational assets, and monetization potential.
COREDO’s experience shows: ROI from TM registration in the EU for international businesses often exceeds 300% due to increased capitalization and investment attractiveness.

Advantages of a trademark for business

Owning a registered trademark in the EU opens opportunities for tax planning: using IP holding structures, optimizing royalty payments, reducing tax burden under international agreements.
For large portfolios, COREDO recommends automating compliance and integrating TM management into the overall financial strategy of the holding.

Impact of rebranding on TM rights

Rebranding or business expansion requires timely updating of the trademark portfolio and making changes in EUIPO. For long-term protection, it’s important to strategically reserve new Nice Classification classes and regularly audit IP rights. COREDO solutions help minimize the risk of rights loss during brand updating and ensure continuity of legal protection.

Legal Support: what is it?

How to choose a legal partner

Key criteria for choosing a legal partner for trademark registration and protection:
  • Deep expertise in international intellectual property law and EU court practice.
  • Experience with cross-border projects, franchising, and licensing.
  • Availability of automated monitoring and compliance tools.
  • Transparency in communications and readiness to accompany the client at all stages, from due diligence to legal protection.
The COREDO team has executed dozens of projects for comprehensive TM registration and protection support in the EU, Asia, and the Middle East, allowing us to offer solutions tailored to each client’s business specifics.

Practical steps for business

Checklist for TM registration and protection in the EU:

  • Conduct a TM uniqueness search and risk analysis.
  • Determine strategy and choose Nice Classification classes.
  • Prepare and submit an application through EUIPO.
  • Monitor publication and opposition period.
  • Obtain the electronic registration certificate.
  • Set up automated monitoring of violations.
  • Develop a tax strategy considering TM ownership.
  • Regularly audit and update the IP rights portfolio.

Common mistakes to avoid:

  • Ignoring preliminary search and due diligence.
  • Incorrect choice of Nice Classification classes.
  • Untimely renewal or updating of rights.
  • Lack of a system for monitoring violations and digital enforcement.

Key conclusions and practical advice

  • European trademark – is not only a legal protection tool but also a strategic asset influencing brand value, investment attractiveness, and scaling opportunities.
  • A comprehensive approach to TM registration, monitoring, and portfolio management minimizes legal and reputational risks.
  • For startups, IT companies, and international holdings, registering a trademark in the EU becomes a mandatory element of the strategy for entering new markets and protecting intellectual assets.
  • COREDO’s practice proves: competent legal support, compliance automation, and integration of TM into the marketing strategy are key factors for long-term success.
If you want to get an individual consultation or a checklist on trademark registration and protection in the EU, the COREDO team is always ready to share their experience and help your business move to a new level of protection and growth.
In a world where global investment flows exceed 100 trillion dollars annually and competition for capital becomes increasingly fierce, choosing the right jurisdiction and fund structure determines not only profitability but also business sustainability. According to the European Fund and Asset Management Association, over the past five years, the share of alternative investment funds in the EU has grown by more than 30%, with Czech Republic gaining a special place due to the flexibility and transparency of its legal instruments.
ZISIF §15 is a special type of alternative investment fund in the Czech Republic, regulated by the Czech Act on Investment Companies and Investment Funds (Zákon o investičních společnostech a investičních fondech, 240/2013 Sb.). Unlike classical structures, ZISIF §15 provides investors and managers with maximum freedom in choosing an investment strategy, corporate structure, and types of assets. The key feature is the ability to work with both qualified and a limited number of non-qualified investors (up to 20), which makes the fund attractive for family and corporate capital as well as for collective investment in the Czech Republic.
COREDO practice confirms: registering a fund in the Czech Republic using the ZISIF §15 model allows for the implementation of investment projects with minimal capital requirements, flexible corporate management structuring (via s.r.o. or a joint-stock company), and effective protection of the interests of beneficiaries and founders. It is important to note that the activities of such funds are supervised by the Czech National Bank (ČNB), which ensures a high level of trust from international investors.

Advantages and Limitations of ZISIF §15 for International Business

Illustration for the section "Advantages and Limitations of ZISIF §15 for International Business" in the article "Alternative Investment Fund ZISIF §15 in the Czech Republic"

Why has ZISIF §15 become the choice for many international companies and family offices? In practice, the COREDO team has implemented dozens of projects where the key advantages have been:

  • Flexibility in choosing an investment strategy: allowed to invest in a wide range of assets, including securities, real estate, startups, cryptocurrencies, and even unconventional instruments.
  • Minimal regulatory barriers: no minimum capital requirements, no mandatory license for a management company (subject to the limit on the number of investors and assets up to 100,000,000 EUR).
  • Scalability: the fund structure allows for the attraction of new investors (up to 20 non-qualified or unlimited number of qualified), as well as integration into international holding structures.
  • Simplicity of corporate management: founders can use s.r.o. or a joint-stock company, retaining control over the fund and profit distribution.
  • Reduced administrative burden: simplified reporting and compliance requirements compared to traditional collective investment funds.
On the other hand, there are limitations that are important to consider when strategic planning:

  • Investment limit: the total volume of assets should not exceed 100,000,000 EUR.
  • Minimum investment threshold for qualified investors: 125,000 EUR.
  • Limitations on the number of non-qualified investors: no more than 20.
  • No public offer: the fund cannot offer its shares or units to an unlimited number of people.
A COREDO implemented case for a family office demonstrated: with the proper structuring of a ZISIF §15 fund, capital can be managed effectively, tax risks minimized, and asset continuity between generations ensured.

Comparison of ZISIF §15 and Other Investment Funds (FKI, SICAV, EU and Asia Structures)

Choosing a fund structure is a strategic decision that affects the tax burden, level of compliance, and scalability opportunities. For clarity, I will provide a comparative table:

Criterion ZISIF §15 (Czech Republic) FKI (Czech Republic) SICAV (EU) Analogues in Asia
Minimum capital None (or minimal) 1,250,000 EUR 1,250,000 EUR From 100,000 USD
Type of investors Qualified/up to 20 non-qualified Only qualified Qualified/public Depends on jurisdiction
Regulator ČNB ČNB EU regulators Asian country regulators
AML/compliance Simplified requirements Strict requirements Strict requirements Varies
Registration timeline 2-4 months 3-6 months 3-6 months From 1 month
Creation cost From 109,000 CZK Higher Higher Relatively lower
Scalability opportunities Medium High High Medium/high
The EU market traditionally imposes high licensing requirements for investment funds, especially in the FKI and SICAV segments. However, ZISIF §15 stands out for its quick launch potential, low initial costs, and flexible corporate structure. A solution developed by COREDO for an international startup fund allowed the client to complete registration and begin attracting investments in 3 months, which would have been impossible with the classic FKI structure.

Registration of ZISIF §15 Fund in the Czech Republic

Illustration for the section "Registration of ZISIF §15 Fund in the Czech Republic" in the article "Alternative Investment Fund ZISIF §15 in the Czech Republic"

Legal and Organizational Requirements for Fund Registration

Illustration for the section "Legal and Organizational Requirements for Fund Registration" in the article "Alternative Investment Fund ZISIF §15 in the Czech Republic"

Registering a fund in the Czech Republic using the ZISIF §15 model begins with choosing the optimal corporate structure. In practice, a limited liability company (s.r.o.) or joint-stock company is most commonly used. This approach ensures management flexibility, transparency of beneficial ownership, and limitation of founder liability.

Key stages:

  • Preparation of founding documents, including the charter, internal regulations, andagreements between founders.
  • Determination of ownership structure and share distribution, considering the requirements for beneficial ownership and fiduciary management.
  • Appointment of a director and, if necessary, an asset management company in the Czech Republic.
  • Opening of a corporate account in a Czech or European bank.
A project implemented by the COREDO team for a holding with Asian and European investors showed: proper structuring at the registration stage significantly reduces the risks of further disputes among participants and simplifies passing compliance procedures.

Documents for ZISIF §15 Fund Registration and Interaction with the Czech National Bank

Illustration for the section "Documents for ZISIF §15 Fund Registration and Interaction with the Czech National Bank" in the article "Alternative Investment Fund ZISIF §15 in the Czech Republic"

To submit an application to the Czech National Bank (ČNB), a comprehensive set of documents is required, including:

  • Founding documents (charter, founding agreement).
  • A detailed business plan of the investment fund with a description of the investment strategy, target assets, and profitability scenarios for PRIIPs.
  • List of founders and beneficiaries with confirmation of sources of funds and ownership structure.
  • KID (Key Information Document): a key information document mandatory for PRIIPs Regulation compliance.
  • Documents confirming the qualifications of the management company or director.
  • Protocol on the issuance of fund shares (in the case of a joint-stock structure) or share distribution (for s.r.o.).
The COREDO team accompanies clients at all stages of interaction with ČNB, including document preparation, negotiations, and explanation of specific aspects of the public offer of investment funds.

Timeline and Cost of Registration, Process Stages

Illustration for the section "Timeline and Cost of Registration, Process Stages" in the article "Alternative Investment Fund ZISIF §15 in the Czech Republic"

The registration period for a ZISIF §15 fund typically ranges from 2 to 4 months, provided that documents are prepared correctly and there is proactive interaction with the regulator. The cost of full legal support depends on the complexity of the structure, number of founders, and specifics of the investment strategy, but as COREDO’s experience shows, initial costs are notably lower compared to the establishment of classical collective investment funds.

Process stages:

  • Preparation and agreement on the corporate structure (1-2 weeks).
  • Collection and processing of documents, preparation of the business plan and KID (2-4 weeks).
  • Submission of the application and documents to ČNB, interaction with the regulator (4-8 weeks).
  • Obtaining the permit and registration documents, fund launch.
In one of COREDO’s recent cases for a European technology holding, the entire process—from concept to obtaining ČNB permission—took 11 weeks, which became a critical competitive advantage for the client.
Thus, registering a ZISIF §15 investment fund in the Czech Republic requires a comprehensive approach to legal and organizational preparation, allowing for an efficient transition to the formation and implementation of the fund’s investment strategy.

Investment Strategy of ZISIF §15

Investment Strategy Requirements and Permitted Assets

ZISIF §15 provides broad opportunities for crafting an individual investment strategy. The law allows the inclusion in the portfolio of:

  • Traditional financial instruments (stocks, bonds, derivatives).
  • Real estate and infrastructure projects.
  • Startups, venture investments, and innovative companies.
  • Cryptocurrencies and digital assets (subject to AML compliance).
  • Family and corporate capital, which is particularly relevant for inheritance structuring and family asset management.
In one of COREDO’s projects for a family capital fund in the Czech Republic, the investment strategy combined investments in Czech real estate, EU startups, and digital assets, allowing risk diversification and stable ROI.

Organization of Fund Management and Collective Investments

Asset management in the EU requires not only professional expertise but also strict adherence to fiduciary management standards. In a ZISIF §15 structure, it is possible to appoint an asset management company in the Czech Republic or for the fund director to manage independently. It is essential to ensure process transparency, regular reporting to investors, and compliance with all collective investment requirements in the Czech Republic.

The COREDO team recommends integrating modern automation tools, platforms for portfolio monitoring, digital solutions for AML reporting, and risk management. This approach has proven effective in a case with an international fund where digitization reduced administrative expenses by 30% and increased transparency for investors.

Performance Metrics and ROI: How to Evaluate Fund Results

Evaluating the effectiveness of a fund is built on several key metrics:

  • ROI (Return on Investment), a key indicator for investors reflecting investment profitability.
  • Profitability scenarios for PRIIPs: modeling various portfolio development scenarios and their impact on final profitability.
  • Comparing profitability with similar funds in the EU and Asia, allowing investors to make informed decisions about capital diversification.
In COREDO practice, both traditional financial metrics and modern risk analysis tools are used, enabling clients to receive an objective view of the fund’s effectiveness.

Compliance and AML for ZISIF §15

AML and Compliance Procedures: Identification, Screening, Documentation

Adherence to anti-money laundering legislation (AML) and compliance is an integral part of managing any investment fund in the Czech Republic. For ZISIF §15, simplified but mandatory procedures apply:

  • Identification and screening of investors, including verification of sources of funds and beneficial ownership.
  • Maintaining AML reports for the fund, documentation storage, and regular data updates.
  • Preparation and updating of KID (Key Information Document) in accordance with PRIIPs Regulation requirements.
  • Implementation of internal policies for income legalization and prevention of terrorism financing.
COREDO solutions in AML consulting enable automation of a significant portion of procedures, minimizing the human factor and reducing the risk of regulatory sanctions.

Reporting, Audit, and Interaction with the Regulator

ZISIF §15 is obliged to maintain regular reporting to the Czech National Bank, including:

  • Financial reporting according to established standards.
  • Reports on asset movements and investment activities.
  • Audit opinions (upon reaching certain asset thresholds).
  • Prompt information to the regulator regarding significant changes in the fund structure or investor composition.
COREDO’s practice shows: timely and correct reporting significantly reduces the likelihood of inspections and facilitates fund scaling.

Compliance with PRIIPs Regulation and OtherEuropean Requirements

To enter the international market and attract investors from the EU, the fund must comply with the requirements of PRIIPs Regulation, including the preparation of KID, disclosure of all risks and profitability scenarios, and ensuring transparency of the investment strategy.

COREDO supports clients at all stages – from initial documentation preparation to fund integration into international tax structures, which is critically important for long-term success.

Moving to the next aspects – exit strategies and ZISIF §15 integration, allows for comprehensive fund support throughout all stages of its activity.

Exit Strategies and Integration of ZISIF §15

Exit Strategies for Investors and Founders

An investor’s exit from a ZISIF §15 fund can be realized through the sale of a share, buyout of shares by the fund, or transfer of rights to third parties. It is important to pre-determine the mechanisms for share valuation, exit timelines and conditions, as well as tax implications for the investor and the fund.

The COREDO team recommends including clear exit strategy provisions in corporate documentation, which helps avoid conflicts and ensure predictability for all participants.

Scaling the Fund: Attracting New Investors and Expanding Geography

ZISIF §15 offers opportunities for scaling by attracting new qualified investors and expanding the geographical scope of activities. However, it is important to consider limitations on the number of non-qualified investors and asset limits.

In practice, COREDO has implemented scenarios where a fund, upon reaching the asset limit, transformed into a more complex structure (e.g., FKI) while maintaining management and asset continuity.

Integration of the Fund into International Holding and Tax Structures

ZISIF §15 can be integrated into international holding structures to optimize taxation, protect assets, and increase investment attractiveness. It is important to consider the features of international tax planning, requirements for beneficial ownership, and controlled foreign company (CFC) rules in the investors’ countries of residence.

COREDO assists clients with all stages of integration, developing individual scenarios considering the specifics of the EU and Asia, as well as local regulatory requirements.

Conclusions and Recommendations for Business

  • Practical Steps for Registration: clear planning, document preparation, and professional support at all stages are the key to successfully launching a fund.
  • Legal Support for Investment Funds: COREDO’s experience shows that comprehensive support minimizes risks and accelerates interaction processes with regulators.
  • Risk Minimization: implementation of modern compliance and AML solutions, reporting automation, and transparent corporate structure.
  • Reliable AML Compliance: regular investor screening, documentation updates, and integration of digital tools.
  • Comprehensive business support: from jurisdiction selection to scaling and investor exit.
  • Saving Time and Resources: process optimization, reduced administrative burden, and automation of fund management.
  • Best Practices in Collective Investment Management: transparency, regular reporting, and flexible investment strategy.
  • Innovative Risk Management Approaches: asset diversification, digital solutions, and integration into international structures.
If you are looking for a strategic partner for creating and managing an alternative investment fund in the Czech Republic, COREDO’s experience and expertise in international consulting can help achieve even the most ambitious goals—from registering a ZISIF §15 fund to integrating into global holding structures.

91% of clients choose a forex broker with a license, and 7 out of 10 bank accounts for brokers are opened only when a Forex trading license is available. In an era of tightened regulation and global competition, a forex broker’s license has long ceased to be a mere formality and has become a key factor for trust, access to international payments, and investor protection. Today, lacking a license is not just a restriction on working with banks and payment systems but also a reputational risk that can cost a business.

Ask yourself: are you willing to risk clients’ trust and investments to save on licensing? Or strategically build your business on a solid foundation that meets international Forex regulatory standards?

My years of experience show that a wise choice of jurisdiction and obtaining a forex broker license are not just legal formalities but strategic assets that determine a company’s value, stability, and scaling potential. In this article, I will analyze in detail how to choose a country for registering a forex broker, what licenses exist, how requirements differ across jurisdictions, and how the COREDO team helps clients build transparent, sustainable, and profitable forex businesses. I recommend reading to the end, as you will receive not only answers to key questions but also practical tools for making well-informed decisions.

Jurisdictions for Forex Broker License

Illustration for the section "Jurisdictions for Forex Broker License" in the article "Forex Trading License - Analyzing Popular Jurisdictions"
Choosing a jurisdiction for a forex business is always a balance between the cost of a forex broker license , registration speed , capital requirements , and the level of regulation. Registering a forex broker in the right country opens doors to international markets, reduces operational and tax costs, and minimizes strategic and reputational risks.

Therefore, a wise choice of registration country becomes a key step in developing a successful forex business and requires a thorough assessment of all factors.

How to Choose a Jurisdiction for a Forex License

COREDO’s experience shows that the optimal choice of jurisdiction is based on a comprehensive assessment of the following factors:

  • Forex License Requirements: Include minimum capital requirements , the presence of a local office , corporate structure, and internal control requirements. For instance, for a Forex license in Estonia, the minimum capital starts at 50,000 EUR, whereas in the UK: from 730,000 GBP.
  • Requirements for Forex Companies’ Executives: Regulators (EFSA, CySEC, FCA, ASIC) impose strict requirements on experience, qualifications, no criminal record, and the reputation of directors. At COREDO, we prepare a dossier for each executive, including confirmation of professional competence and certification of capital market specialists.
  • Compliance for Forex Brokers: Involves developing a business plan for the forex license, KYC/AML procedures, internal policies, and automating due diligence processes. COREDO’s practice confirms that thorough preparation of the compliance package speeds up the process of obtaining a Forex license and reduces the likelihood of rejection.
  • Internal Control and Audit: International standards require the implementation of internal control systems, regular audits, and transparent financial reporting. This is not only a regulatory requirement but also a risk management tool that builds client trust.
  • Financial Stability: Regulators analyze not only capital but also funding sources, income and expense structures, and the availability of reserves to cover operational and market risks.

Offshore or Onshore Forex License?

The market offers both offshore and onshore licenses for forex brokers. The solution developed at COREDO is always based on the analysis of the client’s objectives, target markets, and long-term goals.

Offshore Licenses (e.g., British Virgin Islands, Mauritius, Panama):

  • Benefits: low cost of the forex broker license, minimal capital requirements, quick registration times.
  • Risks: limited access to banking services, increased attention to AML, reputational risks, difficulties in attracting institutional clients, and entering major markets.
Onshore Licenses (Estonia, Cyprus, UK, Australia):

  • Advantages: high client and bank trust levels, ability to work with European and Asian investors, client interest protection, compliance with international Forex regulatory standards.
  • Limitations: higher costs for registration and maintenance, strict corporate governance, and internal control requirements.

Multi-jurisdictional Licensing is becoming an increasingly popular tool for risk diversification and business scaling. COREDO’s team has implemented projects for simultaneous registration of forex brokers in the EU and Asia, allowing clients to optimize ROI and increase resilience to regulatory changes.

Forex Broker License: Popular Countries

Illustration for the section "Forex Broker License: Popular Countries" in the article "Forex Trading License - Analyzing Popular Jurisdictions"
In COREDO’s practice, the most in-demand Forex licenses are in Estonia, Cyprus, the UK, Australia, the British Virgin Islands, as well as in Panama and Mauritius. Each of these options has its features, advantages, and limitations.

Forex License in Estonia – Requirements

Estonia: a leader in speed and transparency for obtaining a Forex trading license. The regulator EFSA imposes clear requirements:

  • Minimum Capital: from 50,000 EUR for an STP broker and up to 730,000 EUR for a Market Maker.
  • Documents: business plan, proof of capital sources, corporate structure, information about executives, AML/KYC internal policies.
  • Timeframe: 3–6 months with a well-prepared document package.
  • Benefits: high transparency, access to the European market, modern digital tools for compliance automation.
  • Limitations: requirement to maintain an office and corporate secretary in Estonia, regular reporting and auditing.

COREDO’s experience shows that a Forex license in Estonia is particularly advantageous for companies focused on the EU and looking to enter the market quickly with minimal rejection risks.

Forex License in Cyprus: What You Need to Know

The CySEC is a recognized European regulator with developed licensing practices for STP and Market Maker brokers.

  • Minimum Capital: from 125,000 EUR for STP and 730,000 EUR for Market Maker.
  • Requirements: local office presence, qualified directors, transparent corporate structure, detailed business plan, and internal Due Diligence procedures.
  • Timeframes: 4–8 months.
  • Advantages: access to European investors, high reputation, flexible tax conditions.
  • Limitations: strict AML/KYC control, regular inspections and audits, corporate governance requirements.

COREDO’s practice confirms: a Forex license in Cyprus is the optimal choice for companies targeting the EU and Middle East.

Forex FCA License in the UK

The FCA is one of the most prestigious regulators in the world. A Forex license in the UK ensures maximum trust from clients, investors, and banks.

  • Minimum Capital: 730,000 GBP.
  • Requirements: impeccable reputation of managers, transparent ownership structure, high AML/KYC standards, implementation of internal control and financial monitoring systems, regular reporting.
  • Timeframes: 6–12 months.
  • Advantages: prestige, access to global markets, client interest protection, compliance with international Forex regulatory standards.
  • Limitations: high cost of license and maintenance, lengthy approval process, stringent IT infrastructure, and data security requirements.

The solution developed at COREDO for entering the UK market includes comprehensive preparation of compliance documents and support at all interaction stages with the FCA.

Forex License on BVI: Risks and Features

BVI: a popular offshore jurisdiction for forex brokers focused on quick business start-up and minimal costs.

  • Minimum Capital: 100,000–250,000 USD.
  • Timeframes: 2–4 months.
  • Advantages: low cost of license, simple corporate structure requirements, management flexibility.
  • Risks: limited access to European and Asian banks, reputational risks, heightened AML attention, difficulties in attracting institutional clients.

The COREDO team always emphasizes the need for clients to carefully assess reputational and operational risks when choosing an offshore license for a forex broker.

Forex License in Panama, Australia, Mauritius

Panama, Australia, and Mauritius are attractive alternatives for multi-jurisdictional licensing.

  • Panama: minimum capital of 150,000 USD, quick registration time (2–3 months), flexible tax conditions. Regulator: Superintendency of Capital Markets.
  • Australia: ASIC imposes strict capital requirements (from 1 million AUD), management’s experience, and internal control. A Forex license in Australia opens access to the Asian market and institutional investors.
  • Mauritius: minimum capital of 234,000 USD, average registration time (3–6 months), flexible corporate structure requirements, option to open multi-currency accounts.

COREDO’s experience shows that multi-jurisdictional licensing allows optimizing costs, increasing business stability, and reducing regulatory risks.

Let’s proceed with a comparative analysis of the key parameters of each jurisdiction.

Comparison of Jurisdictions by Parameters

Jurisdiction Regulator Min. Capital Timeframe Cost AML/KYC Reputation Transparency Risks
Estonia EFSA 50–730k EUR 3–6 months Medium High High High Low
Cyprus CySEC 125–730k EUR 4–8 months Medium High High High Medium
UK FCA 730k GBP 6–12 months High Very high Very high Very high Low
BVI FSC 100–250k USD 2–4 months Low Medium Medium Medium High
Mauritius FSC 234k USD 3–6 months Medium High Medium Medium Medium

A detailed analysis of jurisdictions allows the selection of the best conditions for obtaining a license depending on the company’s objectives.

Forex License Requirements

Illustration for the section "Forex License Requirements" in the article "Forex Trading License - Analyzing Popular Jurisdictions"
Licensing financial companies in the Forex sector requires not only capital but also a structured corporate governance system, transparency, and compliance with international AML/KYC standards.

AML/KYC: International Control Standards

Modern Forex regulation requires implementing comprehensive AML/KYC procedures, transaction monitoring automation, regular updates of internal policies, and due diligence on each client. COREDO implements solutions that automate compliance processes, reduce operational costs, and minimize the risk of fines and account blocks.

Requirements for the Qualification of Executives

Key regulators (EFSA, CySEC, FCA, ASIC) demand confirmation of professional competence from executives, relevant experience, and a clean criminal record. Capital market specialist certification and regular staff training are mandatory elements of corporate governance in forex companies. COREDO’s experience shows that investment in the team significantly reduces regulatory and operational risks.

Financial Reporting for Forex Companies

Regular financial reporting, external audit, implementation of internal control systems, and transparent income structure are mandatory requirements for all licensed forex brokers in the EU and Asia. COREDO’s solutions include implementing automated reporting systems and preparing for annual audits by international standards.

STP and Market Maker: What’s the Difference?

Illustration for the section "STP and Market Maker: What’s the Difference?" in the article "Forex Trading License - Analyzing Popular Jurisdictions"
Choosing between an STP (Straight Through Processing) and a Market Maker license determines the business model, transparency level, and capital requirements.

  • STP: the broker passes trades to the external market, minimizing conflicts of interest and increasing client trust. Capital requirements are lower, transparency is higher, and market manipulation risks are minimal.
  • Market Maker: the broker sets quotes and can act as a counterparty to client trades. Capital requirements are higher, regulatory control is stricter, but profitability is higher due to spreads and commissions.

COREDO’s practice shows that for entering the European market and attracting institutional clients, an STP license is optimal, while for Asian and offshore markets, a Market Maker license is preferable if a robust risk management system is in place.

Risks and ROI of Forex Jurisdictions

Illustration for the section "Risks and ROI of Forex Jurisdictions" in the article "Forex Trading License - Analyzing Popular Jurisdictions"
Strategic planning for entering the Forex market requires assessing not only the cost of a forex broker license but also potential ROI and various risks, from regulatory to sanctions.

ROI of Countries for Forex Broker Licensing

Key ROI metrics: license and maintenance cost , market entry speed , access to banking services , client trust level , and scalability potential . COREDO’s solution always builds on modeling financial flows, analyzing tax burden, and assessing business growth prospects in the chosen jurisdiction.

Fines, Sanctions, and Loss of License

Violating licensing requirements, non-compliance with AML/KYC, insufficient transparency, or errors in corporate governance can lead to fines, account blocks, license revocation, and business loss. International regulation is tightening, and only a systematic approach to compliance and risk management can protect client and investor interests.

Forex Broker License: How to Obtain?

COREDO’s team has implemented dozens of projects for registering forex brokers in the EU, Asia, and offshore jurisdictions. The process of obtaining a forex license includes:

Steps for Obtaining a Business License

  1. Developing a Forex License Business Plan: financial model, market entry strategy, description of corporate structure.
  2. Preparation of the Compliance Package: internal policies, AML/KYC procedures, due diligence of managers and shareholders.
  3. Submitting Documents and Interacting with the Regulator: support at all stages, responding to queries, refining documents.
  4. Opening Bank Accounts and Launching IT Infrastructure: choosing payment partners, implementing internal control and data security systems.
  5. Obtaining a License and Commencing Operations: integration with liquidity providers, setting up reporting, staff training.

Legal Support: How to Reduce Costs

Comprehensive support from COREDO includes not only legal support for forex brokers but also optimization of licensing costs, compliance process automation, and team training. This approach allows clients to save time and resources, minimize rejection risks, and speed up market entry.

Conclusions and Advice for Entrepreneurs

A Forex trading license is not just a formal requirement but a strategic tool for growth, trust, and business protection. Choosing the jurisdiction, license model (STP or Market Maker), building an AML/KYC system, and corporate governance are key factors for the long-term stability and scalability of a forex company . COREDO’s experience confirms: only a systematic and professional approach to licensing allows entering international markets, attracting institutional clients, and ensuring a return on investment in licensing. If your goal is to build a transparent, sustainable, and profitable forex business, the COREDO team is ready to be your reliable partner at every stage of this journey.

In 2024, according to international studies, over 60% of corporate losses in cross-border transactions are related to insufficient counterparty verification and neglecting due diligence. Every third case of account blocking in EU and Asian banks is a result of compliance procedure errors and a formal approach to legal business verification.

But are you ready to jeopardize your company’s reputation, assets, and strategic prospects due to one underestimated deal?

In a context where regulators in the EU, UK, Singapore, and UAE are tightening requirements for KYC and AML, and banks and payment systems are implementing automated verification systems, self-checking of counterparties becomes not just an element of internal control but a key tool for survival and growth in international markets.

Lack of comprehensive verification is not only a risk of fines, blocks, and legal proceedings but also a real threat to strategic initiatives: from entering new markets to attracting investments.

Consider: how transparent is your next partner? Are you sufficiently protected from sanction risks, fraud, corporate conflicts, and reputational losses? Are you ready to integrate best practices of due diligence into business processes, not just to meet regulatory requirements but to outpace competitors in terms of internal control?

In this article, I reveal a step-by-step algorithm for independent counterparty verification, share tools, checklists, and practical cases from COREDO that will help not only minimize risks but also enhance your business’s investment appeal. If you want to get a practical guide to due diligence, adapted to the realities of the EU, Asia, and the CIS, I recommend reading to the end.

Due diligence: what it is and why to check a counterparty

Illustration for the section "Due diligence: what it is and why to check a counterparty" in the article "Conducting Due Diligence for Counterparty Verification Independently"

Due diligence: is a comprehensive legal, financial, and operational check of counterparties aimed at identifying risks, confirming the legal purity of the deal, and compliance with procedures. In practice, it is not just a formal collection of documents but a multi-level assessment system of corporate structure, beneficiaries, financial condition, and business reputation of a potential partner.

In international business, due diligence becomes a standard of corporate governance and internal control. Compliance officer, KYC, and AML procedures, counterparty audit: these are now not only regulatory requirements but also a strategic risk management tool.

Goals of due diligence for business

  • Risk assessment in working with counterparties: timely identification of signs of fraud, corporate conflicts, affiliation, and AML/CTF non-compliance.
  • Prevention of financial and reputational losses: reducing the likelihood of account blocking, fines, legal disputes, and negative publications.
  • Ensuring the legal purity of the deal: checking corporate documents, ownership chain, and history of court decisions.
  • Compliance with international compliance standards: integrating a risk-oriented approach, automating due diligence, and implementing internal company policies.

Types of due diligence: legal, financial, operational, anti-corruption

  • Legal due diligence: analysis of corporate structure, statutory documents, identifying affiliated persons, auditing corporate conflicts and court decisions.
  • Financial due diligence: analysis of financial statements, debt obligations, assessing solvency and tax risks.
  • Operational due diligence: checking business processes, internal policies, corporate governance, analyzing operational risks.
  • Anti-corruption due diligence: identifying corruption schemes, analyzing conflicts of interest, checking compliance with international AML/CTF standards.

Counterparty verification: step-by-step instruction

Illustration for the section "Counterparty verification: step-by-step instruction" in the article "Conducting Due Diligence for Counterparty Verification Independently"

Counterparty verification requires a systematic approach and step-by-step instruction: this reduces partnership risks and helps identify potential partner issues in a timely manner. For quality due diligence, it is important to form a team that can thoroughly assess both the legal and financial aspects of verification. Next, we will examine the key steps in organizing work and analyzing counterparty data.

Gathering a team for due diligence

In practice, COREDO has implemented dozens of projects where the success of due diligence was determined not only by the quality of tools but also by the competent organization of the process. It is important to define the goals of verification, gather a team with expertise in compliance, financial analysis, and corporate intelligence, appoint a responsible compliance officer, and implement internal control.

How to gather and analyze corporate documents

The first stage: auditing corporate documents: charter, registry extracts, meeting protocols, information about directors and shareholders. COREDO practice confirms: analysis of corporate structure and identification of affiliated persons allows early detection of fictitious companies, corporate conflicts, and hidden risks.

Particular attention is paid to controlling the ownership chain and analyzing debt obligations. In several COREDO cases, it was the audit of corporate documents that revealed signs of fraudulent schemes and non-compliance with internal company policies.

Verification of beneficiaries and ultimate owners

Proper verification of beneficiaries and identification of the ultimate beneficial owner (UBO): key to managing counterparty risks. The solution developed at COREDO includes analyzing the ownership chain, collecting supporting documents, checking for affiliation, and analyzing corporate connections through international databases.

In one recent deal in the Czech Republic, the COREDO team identified a hidden beneficiary connected to an offshore structure, allowing the client to back out of a risky deal and avoid AML/CTF violations consequences.

Financial reporting and solvency

Financial due diligence: this is not just a balance check but a deep analysis of financial statements, debt obligations, assessing solvency, and tax risks. At COREDO, we apply both classical financial analysis methods and scoring systems, allowing for performance comparisons with industry benchmarks.

Particular attention is paid to analyzing debt obligations and managing investment risks. In COREDO cases for EU clients, identifying hidden debts and overdue obligations became grounds for revising deal terms.

Customer verification for AML, sanctions, and PEP

Verification for AML/CTF compliance, sanctions lists, and PEP (politically exposed persons): a mandatory stage for any international business. The COREDO solution includes automated checks against international lists, regular database updates, and KYC procedure integration.

In COREDO practice, due diligence automation allowed reducing counterparty verification time from the UK from three days to several hours, reducing the risk of sanction list inclusion and ensuring compliance with international standards.

Reputation and business reliability assessment

Managing reputational risks: a task requiring a comprehensive approach: reputational audit, court decision analysis, corporate intelligence, fraud scheme identification. At COREDO, we integrate open data collection (OSINT), media publication analysis, court decisions, and industry platform reviews.

In a case for a Singapore client, a reputational audit revealed potential partner involvement in legal proceedings, which allowed for a revised cooperation strategy.

Open sources and due diligence automation

Modern tools for independent due diligence include automated verification systems, counterparty scoring, open data collection (OSINT), and corporate platform integration. COREDO’s experience shows that due diligence automation not only speeds up the process but also enhances verification quality through multi-channel analysis.

Due diligence in the EU and Asia: differences

Illustration for the section "Due diligence in the EU and Asia: differences" in the article "Conducting Due Diligence for Counterparty Verification Independently"
Due diligence in the EU and Asia have their differences, related to legislative specifics, information disclosure requirements, and established business practices. Understanding the specifics of each jurisdiction helps avoid risks and build transparent, effective business processes when entering new markets or making deals.

Therefore, it is important to understand the due diligence procedures characteristic of European countries in advance to minimize possible difficulties when doing business in the EU.

Due diligence for business in the EU: instruction

  • Define verification goals and gather a team.
  • Request corporate documents: charter, register excerpt, information about directors and shareholders.
  • Conduct corporate structure analysis, identify ultimate beneficiaries.
  • Assess financial statements, debt obligations, tax risks.
  • Check for AML/CTF compliance, sanction lists, and PEP.
  • Conduct a reputational audit using open sources and court decisions.
  • Document the results and integrate them into internal control.

Due diligence in Asia and Africa

In Asia and Africa, due diligence requires consideration of regional standards and corporate governance specifics. In several jurisdictions (e.g., Singapore, UAE), particular attention is paid to beneficiary identification, corporate structure analysis, and AML/CTF compliance verification.

The COREDO team encountered situations where verifying a counterparty in Asia required requesting documents from multiple state registries, using local services, and considering the national legislation specifics.

Counterparty verification according to international standards

Verification for compliance with international compliance standards (KYC, AML, CTF) is an integral part of due diligence for companies operating in the EU, UK, Singapore, and Dubai. COREDO practice confirms: integrating international standards into corporate policies and automating due diligence not only ensures regulatory compliance but also reduces operational and reputational risks.

Moving to the next section: For more effective implementation of these processes, it is important to use modern tools for independent due diligence.

Tools for independent due diligence

Illustration for the section "Tools for independent due diligence" in the article "Conducting Due Diligence for Counterparty Verification Independently"
Tools for independent due diligence allow a quick and objective assessment of future partners or counterparties’ reliability without involving external consultants. Thanks to modern services, key checks can be performed independently, providing vital information for decision-making at an early stage of partnership.

Services for counterparty verification

There are dozens of tools available on the market for independent legal entity verification: from international databases (World-Check, Dow Jones Risk & Compliance, LexisNexis) to specialized platforms for corporate structure analysis and financial reporting. At COREDO, we use a hybrid approach, combining automated verification systems with manual OSINT collection and corporate intelligence.

Due diligence automation: speed and quality

Due diligence automation allows scaling the process with an increasing number of counterparties, reducing the human factor, and speeding up decision-making. Implementing counterparty scoring, integrating with internal systems, and using efficiency metrics (verification speed, identified risk level, ROI) become best practices for due diligence in international business.

In one COREDO project, due diligence automation allowed a client from Estonia to process up to 100 new counterparties a month without increasing compliance officer staff, thus improving verification quality and reducing costs.

Risk assessment and management in the project

Illustration for the section "Risk assessment and management in the project" in the article "Conducting Due Diligence for Counterparty Verification Independently"
Risk assessment and management in the project require thorough work with any potential threat sources, among which interaction with counterparties stands as paramount. Mistakes at this stage can lead to financial losses and timeline disruptions, making counterparty analysis and verification fundamental tools for effective project risk management.

Typical mistakes in counterparty verification

  • Formal approach to analyzing corporate documents and ownership chain.
  • Ignoring checks for affiliation and ultimate beneficial owner.
  • Insufficient attention to debt obligation and financial statement analysis.
  • Lack of regular AML/CTF and sanction list compliance checks.
  • Underestimation of reputational risks and court decisions.

Due diligence mistakes: examples and consequences

In COREDO’s practice, there were cases where insufficient counterparty verification led to account blocking, legal proceedings, and loss of business reputation. For example, in one UK case, a client faced a sanction risk due to a hidden beneficiary, resulting in transaction blocking and the necessity to revise the entire supply chain.
Verification Stage Main Risks Tools/Methods of Identification Recommendations for Minimization
Corporate Document Analysis Fictitious companies, forged documents Open data collection (OSINT), registry requests Verify through official sources, use multiple services
Beneficiary Check Hidden owners, affiliated persons Corporate structure analysis, KYC Request supporting documents, use scoring systems
AML/CTF and Sanctions Sanction list inclusion International list checks Regular database updates, automation
Financial Analysis Insolvency, debts Report analysis, scoring Compare with industry indicators

Due diligence in international business: recommendations

Due diligence in international business: is an essential tool that helps uncover hidden risks, ensure transaction transparency, and protect company interests when operating in new markets. This material examines key recommendations for conducting due diligence, starting with transaction and partner selection check specifics.

Due diligence in procurement and partnership

  • Integrate due diligence into every stage of procurement and partner selection processes.
  • Appoint a compliance officer responsible for internal control and counterparty audits.
  • Implement automated verification systems and counterparty scoring.
  • Regularly update internal company policies considering changes in international compliance standards.

Due diligence effectiveness metrics and ROI

Evaluating the effectiveness of due diligence includes analyzing the following metrics:

  • Time to verify one counterparty.
  • Number of identified risks and prevented incidents.
  • ROI (return on investment) from due diligence implementation: savings on legal expenses, fines, reputational losses.
  • Level of automation and process scalability.
In COREDO practice, introducing due diligence allowed clients to reduce incidents by 40% and speed up entry into new EU and Asian markets.

Tips for entrepreneurs

Independent due diligence checklist:

  • Define verification goals and appoint a responsible person.
  • Request and analyze corporate documents.
  • Check the ownership chain and identify the ultimate beneficial owner.
  • Analyze financial statements and debt obligations.
  • Check for AML/CTF compliance, sanction lists, and PEP.
  • Conduct a reputational audit through OSINT and court decision analysis.
  • Document the results and integrate them into business processes.

Risk minimization tips:

  • Use several independent sources for verification.
  • Implement due diligence automation for scalability.
  • Regularly update internal policies and train the team.
  • Don’t limit to formal checks – analyze corporate connections, court decisions, and reputational risks.

Recommendations for selecting tools and automation:

  • Choose services integrated with international databases and supporting counterparty scoring.
  • Invest in due diligence automation to speed up processes and improve verification quality.

Major mistakes and how to avoid them:

  • Don’t rely solely on formal document collection.
  • Don’t ignore corporate structure and affiliation analysis.
  • Don’t neglect regular AML/CTF and sanction compliance checks.
With the tightening of international compliance standards and the growth of cross-border transactions, independent counterparty verification becomes a strategic business asset. COREDO’s experience shows: integrating due diligence into corporate practice not only minimizes risks but also creates new opportunities for growth and development in global markets.

In 2023, international regulators imposed fines on financial and non-financial companies for AML violations totaling over $6.6 billion. In the EU and Asia alone, the number of money laundering investigations increased by nearly 30% over the year, and compliance requirements have been tightened in all key jurisdictions. More than 60% of identified violations are related to insufficient automation of AML processes and errors in compliance audits.

Why do even large international companies continue to face risks of fines, account freezes, and loss of trust from banks? How to ensure full compliance with FATF, FinCEN, CFTC, DFS requirements and avoid critical errors in AML risk management? And most importantly, what solutions allow not only to minimize costs, but also to increase business investment attractiveness?

These questions confront executives, CFOs, and owners of international companies daily. In this article, I will explain in detail how outsourcing AML audit helps not only to reduce the risk of fines but also to build a sustainable compliance management strategy using the experience of COREDO in the EU, Asia, and Africa. Read the article to the end: you will receive a step-by-step guide, practical cases, and tools that really work.

AML Audit and Outsourcing for Business

Illustration for the section "AML Audit and Outsourcing for Business" in the article "How Outsourcing AML Audit Can Save Your Company From Fines"

AML audit and outsourcing for business are tools that allow companies to timely identify risks associated with money laundering and comply with legal requirements. In today’s conditions, a competent AML audit and effective outsourcing help businesses not only avoid fines but also build a reliable compliance control system, which is especially relevant for fast-growing and regulated industries.

AML Audit and Compliance Audit

AML audit is an independent comprehensive check of the effectiveness of an anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing system (AML/CFT) and compliance with international standards (FATF, EU, CFTC, FinCEN, DFS). This audit includes the analysis of AML/CFT policies, transaction monitoring, compliance process automation, digital client identification, and risk assessment related to offshore accounts and digital currencies.
Compliance audit is broader: it covers not only AML but all aspects of financial compliance, including due diligence of suppliers and partners, AML incident management, document verification, and suspicious transaction reporting (SAR). COREDO’s practice confirms that integrating AML audit into the overall corporate governance system increases transparency and reduces risks at all levels of business.

Fighting money laundering is not only an obligation to regulators but also a strategic tool to prevent financial crimes, increase partner trust, and prove compliance for banks and investors.

Internal or External AML Audit – What to Choose?

Internal AML audit relies on the company’s own resources but is often limited by the level of expertise and access to international practices. Outsourcing AML audit involves hiring independent experts to conduct an external review of AML, analyze AML/CFT policies, and assess the effectiveness of KYC and AML in the business.

COREDO’s experience has shown that an independent external audit can reveal hidden risks that are difficult to detect within the company, especially when dealing with offshore structures, digital currencies, and complex money laundering schemes. Importantly, outsourcing AML audit ensures due diligence of suppliers and partners and facilitates the exchange of information between companies and auditors without conflicts of interest.
Criterion Internal AML Audit Outsourcing AML Audit
Expertise Limited by internal team Access to international experts
Cost High fixed costs Flexible payment, cost optimization
Relevance of practices Depends on internal training Use of best global practices
Scalability Limited by company resources Easily scalable with business growth
Independence of assessment Possible conflict of interest Objective external perspective
Speed of implementation Slower due to bureaucracy Faster due to experience and technology

AML Violations Fines in the EU, Asia, and Africa

Illustration for the section "AML Violations Fines in the EU, Asia, and Africa" in the article "How Outsourcing AML Audit Can Save Your Company From Fines"

AML violations fines in the EU, Asia, and Africa are becoming more severe: regulators are tightening control and actively applying sanctions against companies ignoring compliance requirements. Violations in the field of money laundering prevention lead not only to million-dollar fines but also to account freezes and, in some cases, loss of the right to operate in the international market. Let’s further review the specific fines and sanctions in different regions.

Fines and Sanctions for AML Violations

Regulatory requirements in the EU, Asia, and Africa for AML are becoming increasingly stringent. Violations of FATF, FinCEN, CFTC, DFS standards lead to severe sanctions: multimillion-dollar fines, account freezes, license revocations, bans on working with international banks. In some cases, companies lose market access due to insufficient reporting of suspicious activities (SAR) or ineffective transaction monitoring.

Real experience of COREDO assisting clients in the EU and Asia shows: even minor errors in AML/CFT policies or AML process automation can lead to AML fines and the urgent need to revise the entire AML risk management system.

Fines for Ineffective AML Audit

In 2022, a European fintech startup that turned to COREDO received a regulatory notice amounting to 1.2 million euros due to errors in outsourcing AML implementation: the contractor failed to take into account the specificity of offshore accounts and did not detect complex money laundering schemes through digital currencies. Only after conducting an independent AML audit and revising compliance processes was it possible to restore banks’ trust and avoid new sanctions.

COREDO’s practice confirms: key mistakes in outsourcing AML audit implementation include insufficient due diligence of the contractor, weak integration of AML services into business processes, and lack of training for AML outsourcing staff. Such missteps lead to risks of failing to meet AML requirements and losing investment attractiveness.

Outsourcing AML Audit: Benefits

Illustration for the section "Outsourcing AML Audit: Benefits" in the article "How Outsourcing AML Audit Can Save Your Company From Fines"

Outsourcing AML audit offers the opportunity not only to enhance regulatory compliance effectiveness but also to gain an independent expert risk assessment. External specialists help identify weaknesses and provide a fresh perspective, essential for companies striving to minimize potential violations and optimize processes.

Outsourcing AML Audit: How to Reduce Risks

The solution developed at COREDO for international clients is based on independent external AML review, deep risk analytics, and KYC and AML automation for businesses. This approach not only prevents AML fines but also establishes a system for preventing financial crimes, which is crucial for companies with offshore structures and digital assets.

Implementing outsourced AML provides proof of compliance for banks and investors, enhances partner trust, and reduces the likelihood of account freezes or license suspensions. AML risk management becomes transparent and predictable, granting businesses a competitive edge in the international market.

Cost of Outsourcing AML Audit

The cost of outsourcing AML audit varies depending on business scale, transaction complexity, and audit volume. However, COREDO’s practice shows: cost optimization in compliance is achieved by reducing hidden expenses (training, IT infrastructure support, regulatory updates), while AML audit ROI is expressed in reducing fines likelihood, speeding up client verification (KYC), and increasing investment attractiveness.

To evaluate outsourcing AML audit effectiveness, I recommend using metrics such as the number of prevented AML incidents, suspicious operations processing speed, compliance process automation level, and adherence to international standards.

Thus, outsourcing allows businesses not only to optimize costs but also to flexibly adapt AML processes to the specifics and scale of activity.

Flexibility of AML Solutions with Outsourcing

Scalability of AML solutions is a key factor for fast-growing companies. COREDO’s experience showed that outsourced AML implementation allows flexible adaptation of processes to new markets, integration of AML with corporate governance, and maintenance of compliance with EU, Asia, and Africa requirements without increasing internal costs.

COREDO’s comprehensive support includes regular AML/CFT policy audits, transaction monitoring automation, and integration of new AML technologies, ensuring the resilience and flexibility of business processes with any volume of operations.

Automation of AML Processes in Outsourcing

Illustration for the section "Automation of AML Processes in Outsourcing" in the article "How Outsourcing AML Audit Can Save Your Company From Fines"

Automation of AML processes in outsourcing allows companies not only to reduce operational costs and minimize human errors but also to quickly adapt to modern regulatory requirements. Cutting-edge solutions in KYC and AML automation become critically important tools for enhancing efficiency, transparency, and business sustainability in 2025.

Automation of KYC and AML: Tools for 2025

The automation of AML processes and KYC is becoming standard for international companies. The use of artificial intelligence in AML, digital customer identification, and compliance process automation allows reducing compliance costs and increasing the accuracy of detecting suspicious activities.

COREDO’s team has implemented KYC and AML automation projects for fintech companies in the EU and Asia, integrating solutions for document verification, transaction monitoring, and AML incident management. This allowed clients to speed up onboarding processes, reduce AML risks, and provide transparent reporting for regulators.

We will further explore how to effectively integrate AML services into business processes and the advantages this brings to companies.

Integration of AML Services in Business

Integration of AML services into business processes is a crucial stage for sustainable growth. COREDO’s practice confirms that the implementation of new AML technologies, AML incident management, and work with digital currencies and crypto assets in the AML context require constant updating of procedures and staff training.

Special attention is given to integrating AML audit with corporate governance, which allows not only identifying and eliminating risks but also forming a compliance culture at all organizational levels.

Choosing an AML Audit Provider: Criteria and Mistakes

Illustration for the section "Choosing an AML Audit Provider: Criteria and Mistakes" in the article "How Outsourcing AML Audit Can Save Your Company From Fines"

Choosing an AML audit provider requires a strict approach to key criteria and attention to common mistakes. It is essential to consider not only the contractor’s experience but also the technologies they use to ensure security and compliance with legal requirements. Next, we’ll explore how to choose a contractor wisely and what to focus on.

How to Choose a Contractor: Experience and Technologies

Selecting an AML audit provider is a strategic decision. Key criteria include experience in international jurisdictions, proficiency in AML process automation technologies, compliance with FATF standards, the presence of due diligence cases for suppliers and partners, and employee training and awareness programs.

I recommend requesting examples of successful implementations from the contractor, analyzing the digital identification tools they use, compliance process automation, and their level of interaction with regulators in the EU, Asia, and Africa.

Mistakes in Outsourcing AML Audit

Common mistakes include insufficient preparation for external AML audit, weak information exchange between companies and auditors, and lack of AML outsourcing staff training. COREDO’s experience shows that successful implementation requires not only technical integration of services but also forming an internal compliance culture.

It is important to avoid situations where the contractor does not consider business specifics, does not conduct regular AML/CFT policy audits, and does not ensure transparency of suspicious transaction reporting (SAR).

To enhance preparation effectiveness, let’s explore key steps that will help successfully pass an AML audit and correctly act afterwards.

AML Audit: How to Prepare and What to Do Next

AML audit is not only a formal check but also an opportunity to objectively assess the company’s readiness to meet legal requirements. To successfully pass an AML audit and minimize risks after its completion, it is crucial to prepare staff and business processes in advance and establish consistent actions at all control stages.

How to Prepare Staff and Business Processes?

Quality preparation for an external AML audit begins with training and raising employee awareness. COREDO’s solution includes the development of individual training programs, modeling AML incidents, and implementing AML incident management systems.

Special attention is paid to document verification, proper recordkeeping, and automation of KYC and AML processes for the business. This minimizes human factors and improves interaction effectiveness with external auditors.

Integrating Audit into Risk Management Strategy

Integrating AML audit results into the compliance system is the key to sustainable development. COREDO’s practice confirms: regular updates of AML/CFT policies, transaction monitoring automation, and AML integration with corporate governance not only reduce AML risks but also enhance trust from partners, banks, and investors.

I recommend using external AML audit results to adjust business processes, optimize compliance costs, and form a unified risk management strategy.

Key Takeaways on the Topic

Outsourcing AML audit is not just a way to reduce the risk of AML fines; it is also a tool for enhancing the company’s business value. COREDO’s experience in the EU, Asia, and Africa shows that independent AML audits, KYC and AML process automation, integration of new technologies, and employee training not only comply with international standards but also exceed market requirements.

For maximum ROI from AML audit, it is important to:

  • Choose a provider with international experience and technological expertise.
  • Integrate AML services into business processes and corporate governance.
  • Regularly conduct employee training and update AML/CFT policies.
  • Use efficiency metrics and analyze hidden compliance costs.
  • Implement KYC and AML automation to reduce costs and increase transparency.

Questions on External AML Audit for Business

  1. What strategic advantages does outsourcing AML audit provide for international companies?
    Outsourcing AML audit ensures independent risk assessment, access to international practices, scalability flexibility, and reduced compliance costs.
  2. How to assess the return on investment (ROI) from implementing an external AML audit?
    ROI of AML audit is calculated based on prevented fines, accelerated KYC, increased banks’ and investors’ trust, and optimization of internal compliance expenses.
  3. What risks exist when outsourcing AML audit and how to minimize them?
    Key risks include choosing an unsuitable contractor, insufficient service integration, and lack of employee training. Minimizing them involves thorough provider due diligence and regular independent AML audits.
  4. How does the automation of KYC and AML processes affect compliance department efficiency?
    Automation reduces costs, speeds up data processing, increases the accuracy of suspicious activity detection, and facilitates suspicious activity reporting (SAR).
  5. What requirements do EU and Asian regulators have for external AML audit?
    Regulators require regular independent AML audits, transaction monitoring automation, transparent reporting, and integration of AML services into business processes.
  6. How to prepare employees for interaction with external AML auditors?
    It is recommended to provide specialized training, model AML incidents, implement incident management systems, and maintain information exchange between companies and auditors.
  7. What technologies are used for automation of AML processes in outsourcing?
    Solutions based on artificial intelligence, digital customer identification, compliance process automation, and transaction monitoring are used, integrated with corporate governance.
  8. How often should an independent AML audit be conducted to meet international standards?
    It is recommended to conduct an independent AML audit at least once a year and when entering new markets or changing the business model.
  9. How to integrate the results of an external AML audit into corporate risk management strategy?
    Use audit results to adjust AML/CFT policies, update KYC and AML procedures, optimize business processes, and form a unified risk management strategy.
  10. How to avoid typical mistakes when implementing outsourced AML audit?
    Conduct thorough due diligence of the contractor, ensure employee training, integrate AML services into business processes, and maintain constant information exchange with auditors.
If you are looking for a strategic partner to implement an effective AML audit and build a robust compliance system, COREDO’s experience in the EU, Asia, and Africa is ready to be your competitive advantage.
In 2025, according to FINTRAC, the transaction volume passing through Money Service Business (MSB) in Canada surpassed CAD 1.6 trillion: and this figure continues to grow at double-digit rates annually. This scale is no coincidence: Canada has established itself as one of the most transparent and technologically advanced financial markets for international business. But behind this growth lies another side: tightening AML/CTF regulations, new requirements for licensing financial services, and constant pressure from regulators on transparency and accountability.
Why are even experienced entrepreneurs and financial directors facing registration refusals for MSB, account blocks, and FINTRAC sanctions today? How to minimize these risks, obtain a financial or crypto-license in Canada, build an effective compliance system, and scale the business without failures?

Let me ask a direct question: are you ready for the new AML Canada standards and transparency requirements that are coming into force this year? If not, this article will help you not only understand the details but also gain a strategic advantage. I’ll explain how the COREDO team implements projects for MSB registration, obtaining a FINTRAC license, implementing KYC/AML procedures, and providing comprehensive legal support to ensure you can confidently build international financial services based out of the Canadian jurisdiction. Read the article to the end – here you will find not only answers but practical tools for real growth.

MSB License in Canada: What It Is and Who Needs It

Illustration for the section "MSB License in Canada: What It Is and Who Needs It" in the article "Financial and Crypto-Licenses in Canada - All About MSB in 2025"

The Canada MSB license is a permit to conduct activities in the field of money transfers, currency exchange, cryptocurrency transactions, and other financial services, issued by FINTRAC (Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada). This license has become a standard for companies dealing with cross-border payments, crypto assets, and international transfers.
In recent years, there has been steady growth in the number of applications for a financial license in Canada, along with stricter requirements for applicants. At COREDO, we see the MSB license becoming not just a formality but a critical element for entering the North American market and integrating with global fintech platforms.

Types of Activities under the MSB License

  • Money transfers (including cross-border payments)
  • Currency and cryptocurrency exchange (crypto-license Canada)
  • Issuance and servicing of payment instruments
  • Operations with prepaid cards
  • Management of MSB branches and agents to expand geography
Implemented case by COREDO: registration of a legal entity under MSB for a large fintech startup from the EU, which, due to the FINTRAC license, was able to legally provide cryptocurrency exchange and international transfer services to clients in 27 countries.

Who Is Required to Obtain an MSB License

In Canada, all companies engaging in at least one type of MSB activity are subject to licensing requirements. Exceptions are minimal, such as companies that only deal with internal settlements and do not accept funds from third parties do not need a license.
At COREDO, special attention is given to due diligence on MSB owners and directors, as well as constructing a transparent MSB corporate governance system: this is critically important for successfully passing compliance procedures and preventing denials from the regulator.

MSB Registration in Canada – FINTRAC Requirements

Illustration for the section "MSB Registration in Canada - FINTRAC Requirements" in the article "Financial and Crypto-Licenses in Canada - All About MSB in 2025"

MSB registration in Canada is a multi-stage process that requires not only document collection but also strategic planning. A FINTRAC license entails comprehensive compliance checks with AML compliance in Canada and international compliance standards.

Documents Required for an MSB License: Requirements

  • Founding documents and personal data of the management
  • Detailed organizational structure of the MSB
  • Business plan for the license with financial forecasts
  • AML/CTF policy and description of KYC procedures
  • Confirmation of a virtual office or physical address
  • References confirming the reliability of owners and directors (due diligence)
The solution developed at COREDO includes preparing the complete set of documents and guidance at all stages of interaction with FINTRAC, minimizing the risk of refusal.

Virtual Office or Physical Address – What to Choose?

A virtual office for MSB is permissible and actively used by international companies. On the other hand, to open a bank account for MSB, confirmation of a real presence is often required. The COREDO team helps find the optimal solution, considering banking requirements and the specifics of interaction with Canadian financial institutions.

Verification of Owners and Directors, Due Diligence

Verification of MSB owners and directors is one of the most challenging stages. FINTRAC evaluates not only the absence of criminal records but also experience in the financial services industry, compliance of the corporate structure with international AML standards, as well as transparency of funding sources. At COREDO, we implement internal audits and appoint a compliance officer at early stages, which significantly speeds up coordination and reduces the likelihood of denial.

AML Policy for MSB in Canada

Illustration for the section "AML Policy for MSB in Canada" in the article "Financial and Crypto-Licenses in Canada - All About MSB in 2025"

AML Canada: it’s not just a formality; it’s the foundation of a sustainable business. In 2025, FINTRAC tightened AML requirements/CTF policy for MSB, including mandatory transaction monitoring, KYC and CTF procedures implementation, and regular reporting of suspicious operations.

KYC: Automation and Procedure Implementation

Modern KYC policy in Canada requires not only customer identification but also continual monitoring of their transactions. Implementing AML procedures in MSB, based on COREDO experience, becomes more effective with the use of AML automation technologies: integration with fintech platforms, use of machine learning to detect suspicious transactions, automation of data collection and verification about customers.

Responsibilities and Requirements for an AML Officer

The AML officer (anti-money laundering officer) is a key figure for MSB compliance in Canada. Requirements for the experience of an AML officer include knowledge of local and international legislation, experience in implementing internal policies, conducting internal controls, and audits. At COREDO, we select specialists with relevant certification and experience in international structures, ensuring compliance with the strictest standards.

MSB Reporting to FINTRAC: Fines and Sanctions

MSB reporting to FINTRAC includes regular submission of information on suspicious operations, updating branch and agent data, and annual activity reports. The absence of an MSB license or non-compliance with AML/CTF policies entails FINTRAC’s sanction measures: from large fines to full activity blocking.
Thus, careful adherence to all FINTRAC requirements and maintaining a high level of compliance are key aspects for successful MSB work in Canada. Next, let’s look at what constitutes the cost of obtaining an MSB license.

Cost of an MSB License in Canada

Illustration for the section "Cost of an MSB License in Canada" in the article "Financial and Crypto-Licenses in Canada - All About MSB in 2025"

The cost of a Canada MSB license comprises direct and indirect expenses, as well as costs for maintaining compliance and implementing AML procedures. Financial forecasts for the MSB license should contemplate not only initial investments but also regular expenses for legal support, virtual office rent, staff salaries, and process automation.

Direct and Indirect Expenses for the License

  • Government fees for registering a legal entity under MSB
  • Payment for document preparation services for the MSB license
  • Cost of virtual office rental and bank account opening for MSB
Indirect costs include expenses for implementing AML/CTF policy, staff training, IT infrastructure maintenance, and regular audits.

Financial Risks and ROI Calculation

Assessing the financial risks of MSB includes analyzing potential fines, compliance costs, and possible delays when interacting with banks. At COREDO, we develop financial forecasts for the MSB license and calculate ROI for MSB considering all variables: from licensing costs to expenses for scaling and integration with fintech platforms.

MSB in Canada: Branches, Agents, Fintech

Illustration for the section "MSB in Canada: Branches, Agents, Fintech" in the article "Financial and Crypto-Licenses in Canada - All About MSB in 2025"

Scaling MSB in Canada requires a structured system for managing branches and agents, as well as integration with modern fintech solutions to ensure transparency of financial flows and compliance with international AML standards.
Effective interaction between branches and agents becomes a key factor for sustainable growth of MSB and requires special attention to risk management and regulatory compliance.

Managing Branches and Agents – Risks and Requirements

Managing MSB branches and agents involves regularly updating data in FINTRAC, conducting partner due diligence, and implementing reliability assessment criteria. COREDO’s solutions allow centralized control and minimize risks associated with agent activities in foreign markets.

Cross-border Payments and AML Standards

Cross-border payments require particular attention to international AML standards and MSB cybersecurity. COREDO’s experience shows that implementing comprehensive monitoring procedures and transparency of financial flows increases investor and regulator trust, as well as reduces the likelihood of account blocks.

Innovation and Automation for MSB

AML automation technologies are becoming the standard for MSB in 2025. Integration with fintech platforms, automation of AML procedures, and using artificial intelligence for transaction monitoring significantly reduce costs and enhance compliance efficiency. The COREDO team implements innovative solutions that not only meet regulatory requirements but also lead market trends.

Legal Support for MSB: Risks and FINTRAC Audit

Comprehensive legal support for MSB: a key factor for success at all stages, from registration to scaling. Compliance for MSB in Canada requires continuous internal control, regular audits, and prompt preparation for FINTRAC checks.

Corporate Governance and Internal Control

Effective MSB corporate governance is built on a transparent organizational structure, clear delineation of authority, and regular internal audits. At COREDO, we implement best international practices, enabling our clients to successfully pass audits and minimize regulatory sanction risks.

Errors Leading to Sanctions in SEO

Common mistakes in obtaining an MSB license: incomplete document packages, inadequate AML/CTF policy development, absence of a qualified AML officer. Consequences of non-compliance with AML/CTF policies – from license denial to large fines and activity blockages.
COREDO’s practice shows: only a systematic approach and comprehensive legal support can mitigate these risks.

Practical Recommendations for Entrepreneurs

Practical recommendations for entrepreneurs will help navigate the key steps and nuances of doing business in Canada. The following subsections contain specific advice on launching and effectively managing MSB so every entrepreneur can confidently navigate the local business environment.

Launching and Managing MSB in Canada

Stage Practical Steps and Recommendations
Registration of a Legal Entity Prepare founding documents, choose MSB structure
Business Plan Preparation Develop financial forecasts, describe the business model
document collection for the license Gather personal data of management, company structure
Implementation of AML/CTF Policy Develop KYC/AML procedures, appoint an AML officer
opening a bank account Select a bank, consider virtual office requirements
Implementation of Automation Integrate AML/KYC platforms, automate monitoring
Managing Branches and Agents Implement due diligence, update data in FINTRAC
Preparation for FINTRAC Audit Conduct internal audit, regularly update policy

Tips for Choosing a Partner:

  • Evaluate the team’s experience in MSB registration and obtaining a FINTRAC license
  • Check for expertise in international AML standards and compliance
  • Ensure the presence of comprehensive solutions for automation and support

Recommendations for Cost Reduction:

  • Use a virtual office for MSB if acceptable by the bank
  • Implement KYC/AML automation to reduce personnel costs
  • Regularly update business processes in accordance with new FINTRAC requirements
Adhering to these steps and strategies, as confirmed by COREDO’s practice, allows not only to obtain an MSB license in Canada but also to build a sustainable, scalable, and transparent international financial business.
The year 2025 marks a record growth in the number of international crypto companies facing increased MiCA regulations in the EU, while interest in alternative jurisdictions rises. According to the European Blockchain Observatory, in just the past year, over 40% of crypto services in Europe revised their structures due to new CASP and DASP rules. Meanwhile, the number of company registrations in Panama for crypto business increased by 27% (data from the Panamanian Chamber of Commerce, 2024).
Why are entrepreneurs increasingly looking at Panama? Which choice provides a strategic advantage: stringent EU licensing or the flexibility of an offshore jurisdiction?
In this article, I will not only compare MiCA and Panama: you will receive a practical guide based on COREDO’s experience, with real scenarios, risks, and recommendations. If you’re looking for answers about licensing, AML compliance, scaling, and risk management, read on. Here you’ll find not only analysis but also strategic ideas for long-term growth.

MiCA Requirements for Crypto Business in the EU

MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) is the most significant reform of virtual asset regulation in Europe, covering CASP, DASP, and all key aspects of blockchain compliance. For a legal entity registration in Europe now requires not only a standard incorporation procedure but also obtaining an EU crypto license (VASP/CASP), certification, implementing comprehensive AML procedures and KYC processes, as well as ensuring transparent financial reporting and minimum share capital (from €125,000 for most CASP).
Implementing MiCA required crypto companies to introduce new administration standards, regular audits and certifications, as well as a detailed risk management system. Our experience at COREDO showed: breaking into the EU market now requires not only legal support for crypto companies but also a deep restructuring of business processes to meet institutional investor standards. Without this, building trust with banks and attracting major investments is impossible.

Registering a Crypto Business in Panama

Panama for crypto business: above all, regulatory flexibility, minimal bureaucratic barriers, and quick company registration (2–4 weeks). For international crypto projects, Panama offers a unique combination: no mandatory crypto license, basic AML/KYC procedures, a flexible tax system, and the ability to legalize income through transparent offshore structures.
The solution developed at COREDO for clients targeting Panama includes configuring KYC and AML procedures according to international standards, organizing corporate governance, and optimizing Panama’s tax residency to reduce international taxation. Panama allows quickly scaling crypto services without sacrificing the safety of digital assets and financial transparency: provided a competent implementation of the risk management system.

MiCA or Panama – What Should Crypto Businesses Choose?

Illustration for the section "MiCA or Panama - What Should Crypto Businesses Choose?" in the article "Should You Consider Panama Instead of MiCA"
MiCA or Panama – what should crypto businesses choose?
This question is especially pressing today for companies needing to choose between the strict but transparent rules of the European Union and more flexible offshore regulations. Understanding the differences in licensing requirements will help make an informed decision on the most suitable jurisdiction for launching or relocating a crypto project.

Company Licensing Requirements

MiCA mandates obligatory VASP/CASP licensing, strict certification, minimum share capital, and transparent ownership structures. In the EU, the process of obtaining a crypto license takes from 3 to 6 months and requires significant expenditure on documentation preparation, implementing client verification systems, ensuring digital asset security, and meeting financial reporting requirements.
In Panama, Licensing cryptocurrencies is not mandatory for most types of activities with virtual assets. Company registration in Panama takes 2–4 weeks, there is no set minimum share capital, and client verification and digital asset security requirements are determined by the company’s internal policy. COREDO’s practice confirms: this approach is especially appreciated by startups and projects focused on fast launches and scaling.

AML/KYC: What It Is and Why It’s Needed

MiCA enforces strict AML compliance requirements, including mandatory staff certification, blockchain compliance implementation, and regular regulator checks. All CASPs are required to conduct deep customer identification, transaction monitoring, and keep detailed financial records. This ensures maximum transparency of business processes and minimizes income legalization risks.
In Panama, AML/KYC procedures remain flexible: the company independently determines the depth of client checks, relying on international standards and FATF recommendations. The COREDO team implemented for clients in Panama the introduction of multi-level KYC procedures, transaction monitoring automation, and setting up a risk management system, which ensured financial transparency of the crypto business and increased trust from banks.

Access to Investments Through Banks

In the EU, licensed crypto companies have access to a wide banking infrastructure: most European banks are willing to serve licensed CASP/DASP, which facilitates attracting institutional investors and integrating with payment systems. MiCA also fosters a growth in trust from banks and investors due to high transparency and mandatory reporting.
In Panama, the banking infrastructure for crypto companies is limited, and access to international payments depends on the business structure and the chosen bank. The solution developed by COREDO for clients includes the selection of partner banks specializing in servicing crypto services, as well as organizing corporate governance to increase trust. For attracting investments through MiCA, Panama is not always optimal. On the other hand, for flexible international crypto projects, it can become an effective launching pad.

Regulatory Costs and Timelines – What You Need to Know?

The cost of a cryptocurrency license in the EU includes not only state fees and minimum share capital but also expenses for legal support, audits, AML/KYC procedures deployment, and maintaining corporate governance. On average, the costs for launching CASP in the EU exceed €150,000, and registration takes 3–6 months.
In Panama, the costs for company registration and launching a crypto business are minimal: registration takes 2–4 weeks, accompaniment and AML/KYC procedures implementation expenses are significantly lower, and the jurisdiction’s economic efficiency allows a quick market entry with minimal costs.

Risks of MiCA and Panama: Legal and Financial

Illustration for the section "Risks of MiCA and Panama: Legal and Financial" in the article "Should You Consider Panama Instead of MiCA"
Risks of MiCA and Panama are not just legal nuances, but also substantial financial challenges for crypto companies and startups. New regulatory requirements affect business stability, operational transparency, and client protection, and non-compliance with these norms can lead to severe consequences for companies of all scales.

Consequences of Non-Compliance with MiCA for Business

Non-compliance with MiCA threatens crypto companies not only with fines but also with the complete loss of VASP/CASP licenses, account blockages, and the inability to attract institutional investors. MiCA implementation complexities are associated with constantly updated requirements, the need for regular certification, audits, and high compliance costs. COREDO’s experience shows: for long-term financial stability in the EU, it is critically important to build a risk management system and ensure compliance not only with national but also international standards.

Risks of Operating in Panama

Panama is attractive for international crypto projects due to its flexibility but requires special attention to risk management when choosing the jurisdiction. The main constraints are limited access to the European banking infrastructure, the need to self-implement AML/KYC procedures, and risks associated with unclear legislative clarity. Long-term consequences of choosing Panama over MiCA can include difficulties with income legalization, international taxation, and attracting institutional investors. COREDO’s practice confirms: competent setup of client verification systems and corporate governance can minimize these risks.

Scaling Crypto Services: How to Enter the Market

Illustration for the section "Scaling Crypto Services: How to Enter the Market" in the article "Should You Consider Panama Instead of MiCA"
Scaling Crypto Services requires a well-thought-out strategy and an understanding of the peculiarities of each jurisdiction to successfully enter the international market. Below we will consider key aspects of scaling a crypto project using the example of Panama and explore what is important to consider when choosing a country to launch crypto products.

Thus, choosing Panama as a jurisdiction for scaling a crypto project requires careful preparation and consideration of local features, which will be discussed in more detail below.

How to Scale a Crypto Project in Panama

Panama for scaling crypto services means fast launch speed, minimal bureaucracy, and the ability to flexibly adapt the business model for different markets. Regulatory flexibility allows quickly testing new products, integrating innovative solutions, and scaling the crypto project without the need for complex certification procedures. The COREDO team implemented projects for clients in Panama where, by optimizing internal KYC and AML procedures, markets in Latin America and Asia were entered within 2–3 months.

Entering the European Market Through Panama

Company registration in Panama does not close the way to the European market but requires the construction of a hybrid structure: part of the operations can be carried out through European partners or subsidiaries that comply with MiCA. An alternative to MiCA is creating an international holding structure with a center in Panama and operating companies in the EU. This scenario allows attracting investments through MiCA and simultaneously leveraging Panama’s economic efficiency. COREDO’s solution for such clients includes a comparative analysis of jurisdictions and developing a phased strategy for entering the European market.
Thus, the choice of structure should be based on individual business goals and the degree of readiness to comply with European requirements.

Recommendations for Entrepreneurs

Illustration for the section "Recommendations for Entrepreneurs" in the article "Should You Consider Panama Instead of MiCA"

Recommendations for entrepreneurs allow you to prepare in advance for the main challenges that businesses face in practice. The following points will help reduce regulatory and financial risks through the implementation of proven approaches to threat assessment and risk management.

How to Reduce Regulatory and Financial Risks

  • Implement multi-level AML procedures and KYC processes that meet international FATF standards.
  • Set up a risk management system and blockchain compliance to monitor transactions and prevent income legalization.
  • Organize corporate governance with clear distribution of responsibilities and transparent financial reporting.
  • Utilize legal support for crypto companies to timely update procedures and comply with new requirements.

Panama or MiCA for Crypto Business: What to Choose?

  • Evaluate the ROI when choosing a jurisdiction: compare launch costs, registration timelines, share capital requirements, and potential scaling constraints.
  • Consider the long-term consequences of choosing Panama over MiCA: access to banking infrastructure, the ability to attract institutional investors, compliance with international standards.
  • The economic efficiency of the jurisdiction should be combined with the transparency of business processes and the ability to legalize income.

Common SEO Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

  • Underestimating the complexity of implementing AML/KYC procedures and blockchain compliance.
  • Ignoring corporate governance and financial reporting requirements.
  • Lack of a European market entry strategy when registering in Panama.
  • Using outdated administration models without considering new standards.
COREDO’s practice confirms: timely implementation of new administration standards and legal support for crypto companies help avoid most mistakes and ensure long-term business sustainability.
Thus, a comprehensive approach to internal processes and compliance with international standards becomes critically important: the question arises: choose Panama or operate under MiCA rules?

Panama or MiCA: What to Choose?

Illustration for the section "Panama or MiCA: What to Choose?" in the article "Should You Consider Panama Instead of MiCA"

**How to choose between Panama and MiCA for crypto business?**
The choice depends on your strategy: if priority is a fast launch and flexibility, Panama is preferable; if access to European investors and banks is needed, MiCA is the optimal solution.
**What advantages does company registration in Panama offer for crypto services?**
Minimal registration timelines, low costs, flexible AML/KYC, and the ability to scale without bureaucracy.
**What risks does the transition to MiCA involve for existing crypto businesses?**
High regulatory costs, the need for constant audits and certification, the risk of license loss for non-compliance.
**How to ensure financial transparency for a crypto company in Panama?**
Implement internal reporting standards, automate transaction monitoring, and use international auditing practices.

Panama or MiCA – What to Choose for Crypto Business

Criterion Panama MiCA (EU)
Licensing No special crypto license required Mandatory crypto license (VASP, CASP)
AML/KYC Basic requirements, flexibility Strict regulations, certification
Banking Infrastructure Limited, depends on the bank More accessible for licensed companies
Registration Timelines 2-4 weeks 3-6 months
Cost Low expenses High costs (minimum capital, fees)
Scalability High, minimal bureaucracy Restricted by regulatory requirements
Transparency Depends on the company’s internal policy High, mandatory reporting
Investor Trust Medium, depends on the structure High, especially for institutional

Consequences of Choosing Panama Instead of MiCA

The strategic choice between Panama and MiCA determines not only current regulatory costs but also the financial stability of the company, access to international taxation, and prospects for attracting institutional investors. Panama for crypto-business is about flexibility, speed, and economic efficiency. At the same time, for long-term sustainability and compliance with international standards, competent corporate governance and the implementation of best AML compliance practices will be required.
The solution that the COREDO team develops for clients is always built on analyzing long-term consequences: only in this way can sustained growth, transparency, and trust from partners and investors be ensured. choosing a jurisdiction is not just a formality, but a strategic step that determines the future of your crypto business.

The implementation of MiCA regulation in Poland has become not just another stage of tightening control, but a real paradigm shift for the market. Previously, the registration of crypto business in Europe, and in particular in Poland, was based on national standards, where the role of the KNF (Financial Supervision Commission) was key, but the framework was relatively flexible. Now, the EU CASP license has become a universal “pass” for cross-border crypto services, and the AML/KYC and compliance requirements are unified for the entire European market.

Thus, the transition to regulation according to MiCA standards inevitably entails a revision of approaches to licensing crypto business in Poland, which is detailed in the new requirements for market participants.

Licensing of Crypto Business in Poland: Changes

Before the implementation of MiCA, the process of obtaining a crypto license in Poland was relatively quick, with minimal capital requirements, a standard procedure for checking beneficiaries, and basic internal control. Intra-group compliance procedures were often limited to formal policies, and integration with the EU anti-money laundering directive remained at the company’s discretion.

With the implementation of MiCA, the situation changes significantly:

  • The capital requirements for CASP start at €50,000, and only own funds are considered.
  • The implementation of the MiCA transition period Poland implies mandatory integration of new standards into national law, requiring a review of all documentation and business processes.
  • Compliance becomes an integral part of operational activity: internal audit, enhanced KYC, regular reporting on suspicious transactions, and mandatory sanctions list checks.

COREDO’s experience shows: companies that started restructuring their AML/KYC procedures in advance and integrated risk assessment of crypto assets went through Licensing faster and with fewer costs.

EU CASP License for Business

MiCA opens fundamentally new horizons for Polish crypto companies. The EU CASP license provides European passporting: after approval by the KNF, you gain the right to provide services throughout the EU without needing to obtain separate licenses in each country. This radically simplifies scaling strategies for crypto businesses in the EU and significantly increases the investment appeal of crypto companies.
The COREDO team has implemented several projects on cross-border licensing: for example, for a client in the custodial services sector, we built a model in which the Polish license became the foundation for entering the markets of the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Cyprus with minimal additional costs and without creating separate structures in each jurisdiction.

MiCA Requirements for Crypto Companies in Poland

Illustration for the section "MiCA Requirements for Crypto Companies in Poland" in the article "Crypto License in Poland - How MiCA Changed the Rules"
MiCA sets standards that affect all key aspects of crypto companies’ activities: from AML/KYC to IT infrastructure and internal control requirements. The KNF Poland financial supervision now operates in close cooperation with European regulators, and bank accounts for crypto businesses in Poland are opened only with full compliance with the new standards.

As a result, crypto companies in Poland require constant procedure updates, making the implementation of new AML/KYC standards a key step towards full compliance with MiCA.

AML/KYC: New Standards and Practice

The impact of MiCA on AML procedures cannot be overestimated: now crypto companies are required to implement not only standard KYC procedures but also advanced transaction control mechanisms, automatic reporting on suspicious operations, and regular compliance checks against sanctions lists.

COREDO’s practice confirms: automating the assessment of crypto asset risks and implementing comprehensive AML/KYC policies can significantly reduce the likelihood of refusal during licensing and minimize the risks of fines.

MiCA Financial and Technical Requirements

One of the key challenges remains opening a bank account for a crypto company in Poland. Banks require transparency, confirmation of funds’ sources, insurance presence, and a clear strategy for financial sustainability. The introduction of DORA and the AI Act strengthens cybersecurity requirements for crypto companies: data protection, digital resilience, regular IT system audits are mandatory.
The solution developed by COREDO for one of its clients included integrating specialized IT solutions for transaction monitoring and automatic reporting generation for KNF, which not only accelerated the account opening process but also increased banks’ trust.

Personnel and Internal Audit: Management Structure

MiCA requires that key managers and beneficiaries undergo fit and proper checks, verifying compliance with professional and reputational standards. Internal auditing in crypto companies becomes a mandatory element: regular process checks, reputation risk management, and implementation of internal control policies.

COREDO’s experience showed: companies that invested in staff training and the development of internal control systems were not only faster at getting licensed but also reduced the likelihood of future regulatory claims.

Crypto License in Poland: New Rules

Illustration for the section "Crypto License in Poland: New Rules" in the article "Crypto License in Poland - How MiCA Changed the Rules"

Obtaining a crypto license in Poland is now a multi-step process requiring thorough preparation and strategic planning. The KNF Poland financial supervision controls each stage, and the application submission and review timelines are strictly regulated.

Application Submission Stages

The MiCA transition period in Poland provides a “window” for submitting applications: companies already operating in the market must submit a complete package of documents within 18 months of MiCA’s entry into force. New players must go through preliminary notification and get KNF approval before starting operations.

In practice, COREDO recommends preparing documents in advance: preliminary expert assessment, business process audit, and compliance due diligence significantly reduce application review time.

Documents for Application Submission

The standard package of documents includes:

  • Business plan with financial forecasts and AML/KYC strategy.
  • Confirmation of capital sources (only own funds, minimum €50,000 for CASP).
  • Internal control policies, criminal record certificates, confirmation of key employees’ qualifications.
  • Description of IT infrastructure, cybersecurity, and data protection measures.
In one of COREDO’s cases for a client in the NFT marketplace sphere, a unique set of documents was developed taking into account the specifics of working with digital assets, which allowed them to go through licensing on the first try.

Challenges for Crypto Companies in Poland Post-MiCA

Illustration for the section "Challenges for Crypto Companies in Poland Post-MiCA" in the article "Crypto License in Poland - How MiCA Changed the Rules"

Cryptocurrency regulation in the EU is becoming increasingly complex, and the liability for non-compliance with MiCA is at an all-time high. Key challenges include adapting AML procedures, managing tax and reputational risks, and ensuring transparency and resilience of the business model.

Typical Mistakes and How to Avoid Them

The most frequent mistakes encountered by COREDO’s team:

  • Underestimation of compliance requirements: a formal approach to AML/KYC leads to refusals and fines.
  • Lack of internal audit and regular checks.
  • Incomplete document package or personnel qualification mismatch.

Recommendation: conduct regular internal audits, implement due diligence at all stages, and use automated transaction control systems.

Risks for Management and Their Responsibility

MiCA increases the responsibility of managers: non-compliance with standards threatens not only fines but also license revocation, inclusion on sanction lists, and account blocking. Managing reputational risks and building an internal control system become critically important.
In one of COREDO’s cases for a large custody service, an internal control system with multi-level reporting was implemented, minimizing regulatory risks and increasing partners’ trust.

Licensing and Scaling Crypto Business in the EU

Illustration for the section "Licensing and Scaling Crypto Business in the EU" in the article "Crypto License in Poland - How MiCA Changed the Rules"

The legalization of crypto activities and the strategies for scaling crypto business in the EU require a comprehensive approach: from document preparation to building relationships with banks and implementing best practices of MiCA.

Preparation for CASP License in the EU

Effective preparation includes:

  • Development and implementation of compliance documentation in line with EU standards.
  • Training personnel on new requirements and ongoing professional development.
  • Implementing IT solutions to automate transaction monitoring and reporting.
COREDO’s practice showed that integrating specialized compliance platforms not only accelerates the licensing process but also reduces operational costs.

How to Increase Transparency and Customer Trust

Financial transparency and internal auditing of crypto companies are key to gaining trust from clients and partners. Implementation of transaction control mechanisms, regular reporting, and reputation management are mandatory elements of a modern business model.

In one of COREDO’s projects for a DAO, a transparent reporting system was implemented, attracting institutional investors and increasing the company’s investment attractiveness.

AI and Cybersecurity for MiCA

Implementing the AI Act and DORA requires integrating cybersecurity solutions: data protection, digital resilience, regular IT system testing.

For a COREDO client in the gamification field, a project was implemented to integrate AI modules for assessing transactional risks, allowing adherence to new MiCA standards and improving resilience to cyber threats.

Key Advice for Entrepreneurs

Criterion Before MiCA (national law) After MiCA (EU unified standards)
Regulatory Authority KNF (Poland) KNF (considering MiCA, EU passporting)
Capital Requirements Flexible €50,000+ for CASP, only own funds
AML/KYC National standards EU unified standards, enhanced control
Passporting No Yes, throughout the EU
Liability Limited Enhanced, including fines and license revocation
Compliance Minimal Mandatory internal audit, DORA, AI Act, etc.

Checklist for Preparing for Licensing:

  • Conduct an audit of current AML/KYC procedures.
  • Prepare and approve a business plan considering MiCA.
  • Ensure IT infrastructure compliance with DORA and AI Act requirements.
  • Verify the qualification and reputation of key employees.
  • Implement internal audit and regular reporting.
  • Prepare a document package for submission to KNF.

Actionable advice:

  • Choose jurisdiction considering strategic goals and European passporting possibilities.
  • Optimize business processes for new MiCA standards.
  • Invest in staff training and compliance automation.
  • Use COREDO’s experience to minimize risks and speed up the licensing process.

To gain maximum benefits from the implementation of new MiCA rules, familiarize yourself in advance with typical questions and features of obtaining a crypto license in Poland.

MiCA and Crypto License in Poland, FAQ

Illustration for the section "MiCA and Crypto License in Poland, FAQ" in the article "Crypto License in Poland - How MiCA Changed the Rules"
How to get a crypto license in Poland after MiCA’s implementation?

A full document package is required, undergo due diligence, implement AML/KYC standards, and submit an application to KNF. MiCA’s transition period allows existing companies to adapt within 18 months.

What requirements does MiCA impose on crypto companies in 2025?

Unified AML/KYC standards, minimum capital of €50,000, internal audits, compliance with DORA and AI Act, and a transparent management structure.

How does MiCA affect AML/KYC processes for crypto business in Poland?

Stricter requirements for customer identification, transaction monitoring, reporting on suspicious transactions, and sanctions list checks.

How to prepare a company for CASP licensing in the EU?

Conduct process audits, implement new AML/KYC policies, automate transaction control, train staff, and prepare a document package for KNF.

How to open a bank account for a crypto company in Poland?

Full compliance with new MiCA standards, capital structure transparency, confirmation of funds’ sources, and cybersecurity measures are required.

MiCA and Entering the European Market for Crypto Business

MiCA regulation transforms not only the legal and compliance environment but also the very strategy of entering the European market for crypto companies. Registering a crypto business in Europe now requires not just adherence to formal procedures, but building a sustainable, transparent, and scalable business model. Legalization of crypto activities becomes the foundation for attracting investments, increasing competitiveness, and long-term development.

COREDO’s practice shows: companies that adapt to new standards in time, invest in compliance and internal control, not only successfully go through licensing but also become market leaders. If your goal is not just to survive in the MiCA era but to use new opportunities for growth, a strategic approach and the support of COREDO experts will help achieve this task most effectively.

In 2025, over 60% of new international companies in the MENA region choose the UAE as their launchpad – and it’s no accident. Over the past five years, the UAE has entered the top 10 global jurisdictions for ease of doing business and investment protection, with the total volume of foreign direct investment exceeding $23 billion last year. But behind this success lies not only attractive taxation: today, business registration in the UAE is a strategic tool for international trade, tax optimization, and entry into the markets of Asia, Europe, and Africa.

However, behind the outward simplicity lies a whole layer of legal, compliance, and banking nuances that can become either a growth point or a source of serious risks. Why do some companies scale and attract venture investments through Hub71 or DIFC FinTech Hive, while others face account blockages or license refusals? How to choose between mainland and free zone to retain control over your business and ensure AML compliance?

In this article, I, Nikita Veremeev, share practical strategies and experience from COREDO on registering and supporting businesses in the UAE. If you want not just to open a company, but to create a protected, scalable, and compliant structure, read to the end. Here you will find answers to questions not discussed in open sources, as well as checklists and recommendations tested in practice.

Opening a Company in the UAE for Business

Illustration for the section "Opening a Company in the UAE for Business" in the article "Challenges and Advantages of Opening a Company in the UAE"

Opening a company in the UAE: it’s not just registering a legal entity, but a strategic decision affecting tax efficiency, access to capital, and scaling opportunities. COREDO’s experience confirms: the right corporate structure in the UAE not only minimizes tax burden but also builds a flexible model for international trade and investment.

Thus, the creation and competent structuring of a business in the UAE requires consideration of new tax realities and related benefits: more on the current corporate taxes and applicable benefits in 2025 will be discussed later.

Corporate Taxes and Benefits in the UAE 2025

Since 2023, the UAE has implemented a 9% corporate tax for companies with profit exceeding 375,000 AED – one of the lowest in the world among developed jurisdictions. Up to this threshold, a 0% rate applies, making the UAE extremely attractive for startups and small businesses. For international holdings and trading structures, the ability to tax plan through double taxation avoidance agreements, of which the UAE has over 130, is crucial.

VAT stands at 5%. On the other hand, many free zones provide benefits or exemptions for export-oriented companies. It’s important to consider the requirements for tax residency in the UAE: to obtain status, a company must have a real office, employees, and demonstrate economic substance.

COREDO’s practice shows that ignoring these requirements leads to the risk of losing benefits and fines.

Free Economic Zones and Mainland: Comparison

Choosing between free zone and mainland: a key stage of strategic planning. Free economic zones (more than 45 of them) offer 100% foreign ownership, quick startup, and minimal office requirements. This is optimal for e-commerce, IT companies, international trade, and startups targeting export. Mainland is suitable for those planning to work with the UAE market, participate in government tenders, and build offline infrastructure.

Criterion Free Zone Mainland
Foreign Ownership Up to 100% Up to 100% (since 2021)
Corporate Tax 0% or 9% 9% (above 375,000 AED)
Operations within UAE Restricted No restrictions
Licenses Specialized Universal
bank account opening Easier More difficult
Office Requirements Flexible Stricter
Currency Control Minimal Almost absent
A solution developed at COREDO often includes a hybrid structure: a holding company in a free zone and an operational branch in the mainland. This approach allows optimizing taxes and expanding business without restrictions.

Innovative Ecosystems and Venture Capital

UAE: one of the few markets where the state actively supports startups and tech companies through business incubators and accelerators like Hub71, In5, DIFC FinTech Hive. Venture investments in the UAE annually exceed $1 billion, and participation in accelerators opens access to international partners and grants.

The COREDO team has implemented projects for the registration of IT companies and fintech startups, which, thanks to proper licensing and support, received investments from ADGM and DIFC funds. For e-commerce and SaaS platforms, free zones offer special licenses and tax incentives, accelerating business scaling through the UAE into Asian and European markets.

Business Registration in the UAE: Challenges

Illustration for the section "Business Registration in the UAE: Challenges" in the article "Challenges and Advantages of Opening a Company in the UAE"

Despite the apparent advantages, opening a business in the UAE comes with a number of challenges that are often underestimated by foreign founders. Our experience at COREDO showed: success depends not only on the choice of jurisdiction but also on strict compliance with compliance procedures, structure transparency, and skilled risk management.

Restrictions on Foreign Ownership: What Business Forms to Choose

Although 100% foreign ownership has been allowed in most sectors since 2021, certain industries (e.g., strategic or related to national security) still require local partner participation. It is important to consider corporate governance requirements, the appointment of a secretary, the disclosure of beneficial owners, and the minimum authorized capital (from 0 to 50,000 AED depending on the license).

COREDO’s practice confirms: errors at the structuring stage (e.g., choosing the wrong free zone or ignoring office requirements) can result in license blockage or the inability to open a bank account.

AML, KYC, and Compliance: How to Avoid Fines

The UAE has integrated international standards in AML/KYC and is actively implementing automatic tax information exchange (CRS, FATCA). Compliance procedures include mandatory due diligence of founders, verification of sources of funds, disclosure of beneficiaries, and economic substance. Special attention is given to CbCR (Country-by-Country Reporting) for international groups.

A solution developed at COREDO includes a preliminary audit of the client’s structure, preparation of KYC files, and support at all stages of verification. This minimizes the risk of license refusal or account blockage due to non-compliance with AML requirements.

Opening an Account for a Company in the UAE

Bank compliance in the UAE has become one of the strictest in the region: banks require a transparent structure, confirmation of economic substance, disclosure of ultimate beneficiaries, and a business plan. The time to open an account ranges from 2 to 12 weeks, and the likelihood of refusal for companies with opaque structures exceeds 50%.

COREDO’s team accompanies clients at all stages: from preparing the document package to selecting a bank considering the specifics of the business (IT, e-commerce, trade, fintech). It is important to work out currency control, asset protection, and reputational risks in advance.

Business Registration in the UAE for Non-residents

Illustration for the section "Business Registration in the UAE for Non-residents" in the article "Challenges and Advantages of Opening a Company in the UAE"

The registration of a company in the UAE for a foreign founder is a step-by-step process requiring strategic planning and precise adherence to procedures. Below is a step-by-step algorithm that COREDO uses when working with international clients.

Choosing Jurisdiction and Corporate Structure

The first step is determining the target market (local or international), analyzing the benefits of mainland and free zone, as well as the possibility of creating an offshore UAE company for holding or investment purposes. It is essential to consider corporate governance requirements, office presence, number of directors, and corporate secretarial support.

How to Obtain a License and Register Statutory Documents

Next, select the corporate license (IT, e-commerce, trade, fintech, etc.), prepare statutory documents, determine authorized capital (from 0 to 50,000 AED), and collect documents for regulator submission. For some licenses, prior approval from relevant authorities is required.

Opening an Account and Passing AML/KYC

After obtaining a license, go through compliance procedures: prepare KYC profiles of founders, disclose sources of funds, and conduct due diligence. Only then does the bank consider the application for account opening. It’s important to prepare a business plan, office lease, and confirmation of economic substance in advance.

Registration of an IT Company in the UAE

Registering an IT company in the UAE requires choosing a free zone with a suitable infrastructure (e.g., Dubai Internet City, In5, Hub71). For e-commerce, there are special licenses allowing international payments and protecting intellectual property. COREDO’s practice shows: a well-chosen zone and license accelerate market entry and reduce compliance costs.

Corporate Reporting and Audit: Requirements

Illustration for the section "Corporate Reporting and Audit: Requirements" in the article "Challenges and Advantages of Opening a Company in the UAE"

Since 2023, UAE has tightened requirements for corporate reporting and audit. All companies in the mainland and most free zones are required to maintain international reporting, undergo annual audits, and confirm economic substance (economic substance requirements). For international groups, CbCR reporting is mandatory.

COREDO supports clients at all stages: from auditor selection to implementation of internal control systems and ESG compliance. Failure to meet requirements threatens fines and loss of tax benefits.

Legal Support for Business in the UAE

Illustration for the section "Legal Support for Business in the UAE" in the article "Challenges and Advantages of Opening a Company in the UAE"

Legal support in the UAE is not only company registration but also continuous monitoring of legislative changes, corporate risk management, and intellectual property protection.

Internal Control in Corporate Governance

Effective corporate governance in the UAE is built on the transparency of structure, regular updates of corporate documents, implementation of compliance procedures, and internal control. Corporate secretarial support and ESG factors are becoming mandatory for companies targeting international markets and attracting investments.

Protection of Intellectual Property and Assets

Intellectual property protection in the UAE requires timely registration of trademarks, patents, and copyrights, as well as the implementation of data protection and cybersecurity mechanisms. For cross-border transactions and international payments, COREDO develops strategies to minimize currency and reputational risks.

Business through UAE: Entry into New Markets

The UAE is not only an optimal jurisdiction for business registration but also a strategic hub for scaling into the markets of Asia, Europe, and Africa. International trade through the UAE is facilitated by free trade agreements, developed banking infrastructure, and support for strategic alliances.

COREDO’s experience shows: opening a branch in the UAE, business migration, and employee relocation allow rapid adaptation to new markets and reduce regulatory barriers. Strategic planning for entering new markets is built on an analysis of tax, legal, and operational risks.

Practical Tips for Entrepreneurs

Checklist for Business Registration in the UAE:

  • Determine the target market and suitable jurisdiction (Free Zone/Mainland)
  • Conduct preliminary due diligence and prepare statutory documents
  • Obtain the necessary license (IT, e-commerce, trade, etc.)
  • Complete AML/KYC procedures and open a corporate bank account
  • Set up internal control and corporate governance systems
  • Ensure compliance with economic substance and reporting requirements
  • Protect intellectual property and assets
  • Develop a strategy for scaling into international markets

Mistakes to Avoid:

  • Ignoring economic substance and corporate reporting requirements
  • Choosing an unsuitable free zone or license without considering business specifics
  • Underestimating the complexity of banking compliance and AML/KYC procedures
  • Lack of asset and intellectual property protection strategy

Practical Advice:

  • For IT and e-commerce, choose free zones with developed infrastructure and startup support
  • For trading in the domestic market: consider mainland with a universal license
  • Implement internal compliance and ESG procedures from day one of operation
  • Engage professional partners to handle complex procedures

Questions about Opening a Company in the UAE

How to open a company in the UAE for a foreign founder?
Step-by-step: choose jurisdiction (mainland or free zone), prepare statutory documents, obtain a license, complete AML/KYC procedures, open a bank account, set up corporate governance.
What taxes does a company pay in the UAE in 2025?
Corporate tax, 0% up to 375,000 AED profit, thereafter: 9%. VAT (VAT) – 5%. It is important to comply with economic substance and reporting requirements.
How to ensure AML compliance when opening a business in the UAE?
It is necessary to prepare KYC profiles of founders, disclose sources of funds, complete due diligence, and comply with international AML/KYC standards.
What are the reporting and audit requirements for companies in different zones of the UAE?
In mainland and most free zones – mandatory international reporting, annual audit, economic substance confirmation, CbCR for groups.
How to choose the optimal corporate structure for business in the UAE?
Depending on business goals: for international trade and IT: free zone; for working in the UAE market: mainland; for investments, UAE offshore company with a transparent structure and corporate governance.

My experience and COREDO’s practice show: success in the UAE is the result of precise planning, professional support, and constant monitoring of legislative changes. If you are looking for not just registration, but strategic partnership and long-term protection of interests, COREDO’s team is ready to offer solutions tested by time and international practice.

On July 31, 2025, a date that will go down in the history of European fintech: the new MiCA regime (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) officially comes into force in the Czech Republic, completely changing the rules for crypto businesses, financial startups, and international companies. According to the European Commission, in 2024 the crypto-asset market in the EU exceeded €1.2 trillion, with almost 60% of entrepreneurs facing legal uncertainty or license denial risk due to non-compliance with new regulatory standards.

What does this mean for business? For the first time in history, Europe is gaining a unified, transparent, and strictly controlled regime for crypto services, with Czech Republic becoming one of the key platforms for scaling and entering EU markets. However, with opportunities come new challenges: tougher licensing requirements, comprehensive AML/KYC control, strict IT infrastructure standards, and serious penalties for violations.

Is your business ready for the transition to MiCA regulation? What strategic decisions will help not only survive but also take a leading position in the new reality? In this article, I, Nikita Veremeev, share practical experiences from COREDO, highlight key nuances of the Czech Digital Finance Act, delve into the process of obtaining a CASP license, and offer step-by-step recommendations for entrepreneurs not ready to risk their future. Read to the end, and you’ll receive not only an analytical breakdown but also tools for real success in the era of MiCA Czech Republic 2025.

MiCA and Digital Finance Act: Changes in Czechia 2025

Illustration for the section "MiCA and Digital Finance Act: Changes in Czechia 2025" in the article "31.07.2025, a new crypto regime - MiCA - introduced in Czechia - exploring"
MiCA and the Digital Finance Act in 2025 inaugurate a new phase of regulation in the digital finance and crypto-assets market for Czechia. These changes unify the requirements for all market participants and introduce unified rules, which both existing companies and new market players need to prepare for.

MiCA and Czech Legislation: Key Requirements

The MiCA regulation is not just another directive but a full-fledged law integrated into Czech law through the Digital Finance Act (Act No. 31/2025 Coll.). The main aim of the reform is to create unified standards for crypto-business, ensure transparency, protect investors, and integrate national regulation into the overall EU system.

The Czech National Bank (ČNB) has received expanded powers to oversee Crypto-Asset Service Providers (CASP), as well as the activities of crypto exchanges, investment platforms, and token issuers. Now the criteria for market access, financial monitoring, and capital requirements have become unified for all EU countries, paving the way for a pan-European license and passporting – the right to provide crypto services across Europe without the need for repeated licensing in each state.

COREDO’s practice confirms: integrating MiCA into Czech legislation requires not only legal expertise but also a deep understanding of the local market specifics. For example, when registering a company in Czechia to obtain a CASP license, it’s important to consider both MiCA requirements and national nuances in financial monitoring and internal control.

Crypto-Assets and Services under MiCA

MiCA covers a wide range of crypto-assets and services, including:

  • asset-referenced tokens (ARTs), tokens backed by a basket of assets (for example, stablecoins linked to multiple currencies or commodities);
  • e-money tokens (EMTs), tokens equivalent to electronic money (for example, stablecoins pegged to a single currency);
  • utility tokens, tokens providing access to digital products or services;
  • services for storage, exchange, portfolio management, placement, and trading of crypto-assets (CASP/VASP).
For token issuers and crypto exchange operators, MiCA introduces new requirements for information disclosure, reserve requirements, and internal control procedures. COREDO developed a solution for one client, an international investment platform, which not only enabled them to navigate licensing in Czechia but also optimize the tokenization of assets considering new standards.

What MiCA Does Not Regulate: List of Exceptions

MiCA does not apply to:

  • security tokens subject to MiFID II;
  • NFTs that are not mass or not used as a means of payment;
  • reverse solicitation – where the client initiates contact with the provider independently;
  • internal tokens used exclusively within closed ecosystems.
These exceptions allow for flexible business models but require thorough legal expertise to minimize regulatory risks. COREDO’s experience shows that proper qualification of tokens and services during business model design is key to successful licensing and reducing operational costs.

CASP License in Czechia: New Requirements 2025

Illustration for the section "CASP License in Czechia: New Requirements 2025" in the article "31.07.2025, a new crypto regime - MiCA - introduced in Czechia - exploring"
CASP License in Czechia: New Requirements 2025 responds to the tightening of European regulatory standards for the cryptocurrency market and the implementation of MiCA. In the near future, obtaining or renewing a CASP license will only be possible by meeting updated requirements regarding the company’s structure, making the authorization process more stringent and formalized.

How to Obtain a CASP License under MiCA

obtaining a CASP license in Czechia under MiCA is a structured process that the COREDO team has implemented for dozens of clients from the EU, Asia, and CIS. Main stages include:

  1. registration of a legal entity in Czechia, considering requirements for corporate structure and transparency of beneficiaries.
  2. Preparation of the documentation package: business plan, internal policies, AML/KYC procedures, IT infrastructure description, confirmation of capital sources.
  3. Contribution of the minimum statutory capital (amount depends on the license class and spectrum of services provided).
  4. Application to the ČNB and passing a preliminary audit for MiCA regulation compliance.
  5. Obtaining the CASP license and activation of passporting for access to EU markets.
COREDO’s practice has shown that meticulous preparation for each stage can reduce licensing times to 3–6 months and minimize the risk of denial.

Requirements for CASP IT Infrastructure

MiCA imposes special requirements on CASP IT infrastructure: the system must ensure cybersecurity, incident resilience, regular data backup, and fast recovery of operations. Internal control systems should include:

  • automated transaction monitoring;
  • procedures for identifying suspicious operations;
  • regular reporting and audit.
COREDO’s solution for one fintech startup included implementing a modular IT platform integrating AML/KYC and internal control automation tools, allowing not only compliance with MiCA requirements but also improving business operational efficiency.

Costs and Types of CASP Licenses

The cost of a CASP license in Czechia depends on the chosen class (e.g., asset custody, exchange, portfolio management). On average, minimum capital starts at €125,000 for basic operations and reaches €350,000–€750,000 for complex services (e.g., work with EMT/ART).
CASP License Class Minimum Capital Main Services Acquisition Time
Basic €125,000 Exchange, custody 3–4 mo.
Advanced €350,000 Portfolio management, trading 4–6 mo.
Full €750,000 EMT/ART issuance, investment services 6–8 mo.
In addition to capital, reserve requirements, liability insurance, and regular reporting to ČNB are mandatory.

MiCA Transitional Period for CASP in Czechia

Illustration for the section "MiCA Transitional Period for CASP in Czechia" in the article "31.07.2025, a new crypto regime - MiCA - introduced in Czechia - exploring"
The MiCA transitional period for CASP in Czechia introduces new rules and strict deadlines for all crypto businesses operating in the country. Understanding these requirements in this regulation and how to properly prepare for the transition to a new CASP license is crucial to ensuring seamless operations.

Transition to MiCA: How to Prepare Your Business

The MiCA transitional period: is a unique window of opportunity for existing CASPs and new players. Until October 31, 2025, companies already providing crypto services in Czechia can use grandfathering (transition provisions) to adapt business models without the risk of operational disruption.
COREDO’s experience shows: effective preparation includes auditing current processes, developing a compliance strategy, updating internal policies, and training personnel in new MiCA regulations.

What is Grandfathering and How to Apply It?

To minimize operational risks and costs during the transition period, I recommend:

  • Conducting a gap analysis of current procedures’ compliance with MiCA standards;
  • Implementing automated monitoring and reporting tools;
  • Using transition provisions for phased migration of the business model;
  • Pre-agreeing with ČNB on the plan for adapting IT infrastructure and internal policies.
In one of COREDO’s cases for an international crypto exchange, grandfathering preserved the client base and ensured a seamless transition to new standards without losing the license.

Transition for Startups and Small Businesses: Key Points

MiCA for startups and small enterprises opens up new opportunities but demands flexibility and quick adaptation. For fintech startups, the COREDO team recommends:
  • Using modular solutions for AML/KYC and internal control;
  • Engaging external experts for speedy compliance procedure implementation;
  • Building scalable IT infrastructure considering future passporting.
COREDO’s comprehensive support allows startups not only to undergo licensing but also to quickly scale the business under new MiCA regulation requirements.

Risks and Sanctions MiCA in Czechia

Illustration for the section "Risks and Sanctions MiCA in Czechia" in the article "31.07.2025, a new crypto regime - MiCA - introduced in Czechia - exploring"
Risks and Sanctions MiCA in Czechia become a key issue for all participants in the crypto market. Non-compliance with these regulatory requirements can lead to significant fines, activity restrictions, and inclusion in high-risk entity registries. Below we will examine specific risks for crypto businesses in the context of MiCA.

Non-Compliance Risks of MiCA for Crypto Business

Non-compliance with MiCA entails severe consequences: fines of up to 5% of annual turnover, license revocation, and EU market access restrictions. Administrative liability extends not only to the company but also to management, who bear personal responsibility for internal control and information disclosure.
COREDO’s practice confirms: key risks include insufficient preparation for new standards, errors in AML/KYC processes, and untimely reporting to ČNB.

Business Executive Duties 2025

With MiCA’s introduction, executives and owners of CASPs must:

  • Ensure transparency of the corporate structure;
  • Implement regular audits and risk information disclosure;
  • Control the compliance of crypto services advertising with new standards;
  • Timely update internal policies and procedures.
The COREDO team regularly conducts training and audits for clients, helping minimize risks and avoid sanctions.

Investor and Consumer Rights

MiCA and the Czech Digital Finance Act introduce strict requirements for investor rights protection: mandatory information disclosure, reserve requirements, compensation funds for consumer protection. For COREDO clients, this means not only a reduction in regulatory risks but also increased trust from partners and investors.

MiCA and AML for Crypto Business

Illustration for the section "MiCA and AML for Crypto Business" in the article "31.07.2025, a new crypto regime - MiCA - introduced in Czechia - exploring"
The MiCA law and AML requirements become key guidelines for crypto businesses in the European market. Modern regulations not only set new rules of the game but also significantly influence AML/KYC practices, especially in jurisdictions like Czechia.

Impact of MiCA on AML/KYC in Czechia

MiCA regulation tightens AML/KYC requirements: all CASPs are obliged to implement automated procedures for client identification, transaction monitoring, and financial monitoring. Czech anti-money laundering legislation is integrated with European standards, requiring businesses to regularly update internal policies and train staff.
COREDO’s experience showed: implementing comprehensive AML/KYC solutions not only meets MiCA requirements but also enhances risk management efficiency.

Implementing AML Policies: Practical Advice

For successful adaptation to new standards, I recommend:

  • Using specialized AML systems with CASP IT infrastructure integration capabilities;
  • Regularly updating internal control procedures;
  • Conducting independent audits of AML/KYC processes.
COREDO’s solution for one client included implementing a unified platform for monitoring all operations, reducing operational risks, and enhancing financial transparency.

AML for Cross-Border and DeFi Operations

MiCA for the first time introduces AML/KYC requirements for cross-border services and DeFi operations. Passporting allows CASPs to provide services across the EU but requires compliance with each jurisdiction’s standards. For DeFi operations, it’s crucial to ensure the transparency of smart contracts and participant identification.

The COREDO team has developed a risk assessment methodology for cross-border activities, allowing clients to effectively scale their businesses without breaching MiCA regulation requirements.
Thus, skillful MiCA implementation provides companies with significant advantages while simultaneously setting new governance and oversight requirements, which is especially important for assessing compliance prospects and risks.

Opportunities and Risks of MiCA for Business

Opportunities and risks of MiCA for business become key factors for all companies wishing to work with crypto-assets in the EU. The new regulation opens the market but simultaneously sets strict licensing and operational requirements, necessitating careful preparation for passporting and licensing.

Passporting and Licensing for Entering the EU Market

MiCA opens up strategic scaling opportunities: obtaining a pan-European CASP license and using passporting enables the provision of crypto services in all EU countries without the need for repeated licensing. For international companies, this means reduced costs, accelerated market entry, and access to new investment opportunities.
The solution implemented by the COREDO team for one client allowed them to enter the markets of five EU countries within six months, leveraging the advantages of passporting and a single license.

MiCA and Tokenization: What Changes for Platforms

MiCA regulation stimulates the development of investment platforms and asset tokenization, setting transparent rules for utility tokens, ARTs, and EMTs. For businesses, this offers new opportunities for raising capital, entering international markets, and implementing innovative business models.

COREDO’s practice shows: proper token structuring and compliance with MiCA standards not only secure a license but also enhance the project’s attractiveness for investors.

Opportunities for Fintech Startups and Businesses

MiCA for startups is a chance to quickly scale the business, using unified standards and passporting. For international companies, new markets open up, as do opportunities for business model migration and integration with the European financial ecosystem.

The COREDO team accompanies clients at all stages: from choosing a jurisdiction and company registration to implementing IT solutions and preparing for MiCA licensing.

Business: Conclusions and Recommendations

Practical Steps for Preparing for MiCA Errors to Avoid ROI Metrics for MiCA Compliance Implementation
Conduct an audit of the business model and processes Ignoring the transition period Reduction in time to market
Develop a compliance strategy Underestimation of IT requirements Increase in market reach
Implement automated AML/KYC Lack of internal control Reduction in regulatory risks
Prepare a document package for ČNB Errors in information disclosure Increased investor trust
Use grandfathering for adaptation Untimely policy updates Savings in licensing
For legal support and consultation on implementing MiCA regulation, contact COREDO experts – we are ready to offer solutions for any task.
Before moving to the FAQ section, we have gathered key points for gradual preparation and successful implementation of MiCA compliance in your business.

Entrepreneur Questions, FAQ

**What strategic advantages does the CASP license under MiCA provide?**: Unified pan-European license, possibility of passporting, access to markets of all EU countries, reduced regulatory barriers.
**What sanctions are provided for MiCA violations?**: Fines up to 5% of annual turnover, license revocation, market access blockage, administrative liability of executives.
**How does MiCA affect market entry timelines and costs?**

  • Licensing timelines, 3–8 months, cost depends on CASP class and service volume; unified standards allow for faster business model adaptation.
**What is grandfathering for CASP in Czechia?**: Transition provisions allowing existing companies to adapt to new MiCA standards without the risk of losing their licenses.
**What requirements does MiCA impose on CASP IT infrastructure?**

  • Cybersecurity, incident resilience, monitoring automation, regular data backup, integration with AML/KYC systems.

Consequences of MiCA for the Czech Market

The implementation of MiCA regulation and the Czech Digital Finance Act is not just a new chapter in crypto-asset regulation but a fundamental transformation of the investment climate and business environment. For companies ready to invest in compliance, IT infrastructure, and internal control procedure development, unique opportunities for scaling, capital attraction, and integration with European markets are opening up.
COREDO’s experience shows: strategic planning, timely business model adaptation, and professional support not only minimize regulatory risks but also allow businesses to become leaders in the new, dynamically developing crypto service market in Europe.
In 2024, more than 60% of European crypto startups faced delays in licensing due to tightened MiCA requirements and more complex AML procedures. At the same time, according to international research, Georgia entered the top 10 countries in terms of the growth rate of registered companies in the field of digital assets, surpassing several EU and Asian jurisdictions.
Why are entrepreneurs focused on Web3 and digital finance increasingly considering Georgia as an alternative jurisdiction for crypto business and company registration instead of MiCA?

In recent years, the team at COREDO has implemented dozens of projects for the registration of legal entities and obtaining licenses for crypto business in the EU, the UK, Singapore, and Dubai. However, Georgia has become a magnet for clients seeking a balance between regulatory flexibility, speed of launch, and availability of banking tools. Strategic planning for Web3 companies today is unimaginable without analyzing MiCA alternatives: and Georgia confidently occupies a special place in this regard.

If you are wondering how to quickly and legally enter the international market, minimize compliance risks, and obtain banking services for digital assets, this article will provide you with a structured guide and practical recommendations. I will explain how COREDO’s experience allows for finding optimal solutions for registering a business in the EU vs Georgia, what advantages and limitations await crypto companies, and how to choose a strategy that is resilient to regulatory changes.

Georgia Registration and Licensing for Crypto Companies

Illustration to the section "Georgia Registration and Licensing for Crypto Companies" in the article "Georgia as an Alternative Jurisdiction Instead of MiCA"
Georgia is one of the few jurisdictions where the procedure of registering legal entities and obtaining a crypto license takes 2 to 3 weeks, with minimal requirements for authorized capital and founders’ composition. This approach is especially in demand among entrepreneurs who need a fast start and flexible corporate structure for international business.

Registration of a Legal Entity and Crypto License in Georgia

COREDO’s practice confirms: registering a cryptocurrency company in Georgia in 2025 will require a minimal package of documents, a charter, information on beneficiaries (UBO), proof of address, and identification of founders. After submitting documents to the National Agency of Public Registry, registration takes 1-2 working days. The next stage: preparation for licensing, where key importance is given to due diligence for crypto business and legal transparency of the structure.

  • Proof of funds sources and identification of beneficiaries (UBO)
  • Description of the business model and internal AML/KYC procedures
  • Coordination with the regulator (National Bank of Georgia or Securities Commission)
  • Opening a corporate account in a Georgian bank

The solution developed at COREDO allows clients to prepare all documents in advance, minimize timelines, and undergo the licensing procedure without additional requests from the regulator.

Thus, a complete package and competent preliminary preparation of documents will serve as a reliable foundation for the further registration of the company in the Free Industrial Zone.

Registration in Free Industrial Zone for Crypto Business

Free Industrial Zone Georgia: a unique tool for tax optimization for companies in the digital asset sector. Registration in the free industrial zone (FIZ) provides zero corporate taxation, no VAT, and simplified foreign exchange control procedures. Our experience at COREDO has shown that this format is especially beneficial for structures with international shareholder capital and operations in multiple jurisdictions.

Key Advantages of FIZ for Crypto Business:

  • Full tax optimization and transparency for foreign investors
  • Opportunity to open brokerage and settlement accounts in leading Georgian banks
  • Flexible corporate structure for international business
On the other hand, it is important to consider: to enter EU markets, compliance with additional AML and KYC standards, as well as preparation of reports according to international standards, will be required.

AML and KYC for Crypto Business in Georgia

Illustration to the section "AML and KYC for Crypto Business in Georgia" in the article "Georgia as an Alternative Jurisdiction Instead of MiCA"

In 2025, Georgia implemented updated AML compliance and KYC requirements, oriented towards international financial monitoring standards (FATF, EU AMLD). This enables companies registered in Georgia to integrate with global payment systems and ensure investor protection in the crypto sector.

AML and KYC in Georgia – How to Meet Standards

COREDO clients often ask: how to ensure compliance with international AML standards when operating in Georgia? The solution is the implementation of automated compliance procedures, regular auditing of internal policies, and staff training. Best compliance practices for crypto companies in Georgia include:

  • Using international providers to check clients and transactions
  • Implementing customer onboarding procedures with mandatory identification of beneficiaries
  • Developing an internal financial monitoring policy for transactions
COREDO’s practice confirms: transparency and automation of compliance processes minimize compliance risks and accelerate integration with foreign banks and payment systems.

AML/KYC for Foreign Founders

Features of AML procedures for non-residents in Georgia include the requirement to provide an expanded package of documents confirming the origin of funds and ownership structure. Customer onboarding for foreign clients requires adapting procedures to international standards, as well as considering legal barriers for non-residents.

COREDO has implemented projects where the automation of KYC allowed reducing client verification times to 48 hours, which is especially important for companies with international shareholder capital.

Opening a Bank Account for Crypto Business in Georgia

Illustration to the section "Opening a Bank Account for Crypto Business in Georgia" in the article "Georgia as an Alternative Jurisdiction Instead of MiCA"
Georgia’s banking infrastructure is characterized by a high degree of digitalization while maintaining an individual approach to clients in the digital asset sector. Corporate services in Georgian banks are available both for residents and foreign companies, but they require thorough document preparation and compliance procedures.

Opening an Account for a Crypto Company

How to open a settlement account in a Georgian bank for crypto business? In COREDO’s practice, this process includes:

  • Preliminary due diligence of the company and founders
  • Preparation of a business plan and description of funds sources
  • Passing customer onboarding and KYC procedures of the bank
Among the banks that open accounts for foreign companies in the crypto asset sector, Bank of Georgia and TBC Bank stand out. Opening brokerage accounts is possible with a license and a transparent corporate structure.

Risks for Non-residents in Georgian Banks

Among the legal risks when choosing Georgia as a jurisdiction, the following stand out:

  • Possible requests for additional verification and disclosure of beneficiaries’ information
  • Restrictions on working with companies from sanctioned lists
  • The need for regular confirmation of the legality of operations for the bank’s compliance department
The solution implemented by COREDO involves preliminary auditing of the corporate structure and preparation for possible bank requests, minimizing legal barriers for non-residents.

Corporate Taxes and Benefits for Crypto Business in Georgia

Illustration to the section "Corporate Taxes and Benefits for Crypto Business in Georgia" in the article "Georgia as an Alternative Jurisdiction Instead of MiCA"
Georgia offers unique tax benefits for crypto business, including zero profit taxation for companies registered in FIZ and reduced rates for residents. Tax residency in Georgia for companies is processed within 1-2 months and allows the use of tax optimization tools for international settlements.

This makes Georgia one of the most attractive destinations for cryptocurrency companies and investors; now let’s consider the taxation specifics in EU countries.

Taxes for Crypto Business: Georgia and EU

Criterion EU (MiCA) Georgia (FIZ/standard)
Corporate tax 12-25% 0% (FIZ), 15% (standard)
VAT 18-22% 0% (FIZ), 18% (standard)
Dividend tax 5-15% 5% (standard), 0% (FIZ)
Tax benefits Limited Individual approach, FIZ

Comparing the licensing conditions of MiCA and Georgian legislation shows that Georgia provides more flexible tax regimes and transparent procedures for obtaining tax resident status.

MiCA or Georgian Laws for Crypto Business

In 2024-2025, MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) became the standard for comprehensive crypto asset regulation in the EU but simultaneously: a source of high regulatory burden and significant compliance costs. Georgian legislation, on the contrary, focuses on minimal interference and support for innovations.

Criterion MiCA (EU) Georgia
Type of regulation Strict, comprehensive Flexible, minimal interference
License requirements High, multi-step Simplified, fast process
AML/KYC European standards National norms, market adaptation
Registration period 2-6 months 2-3 weeks
Tax benefits Limited FIZ, low rates, individual approach
Account opening Challenging for non-residents More accessible, but with nuances
Long-term risks High regulatory burden Possible legislative changes

Georgia for Crypto Startups: Pros and Cons

Advantages:

  • Quick Registration of legal entities and obtaining a crypto license
  • Favorable tax regulation and access to FIZ
  • Flexible corporate structure and legal transparency
  • Opportunity for strategic planning for Web3 companies

Disadvantages:

  • The need to independently ensure compliance with international AML/KYC standards
  • Possible restrictions when entering EU markets due to regulatory differences
  • Risks of changes in national legislation in the next 2-3 years

Risks of Choosing Georgia Instead of MiCA

Choosing Georgia as an alternative to MiCA allows significantly reducing launch and business maintenance costs. However, it requires regular monitoring of legislative changes and constant improvement of compliance procedures. For scaling and entering EU markets, additional Licensing or the creation of subsidiary structures in the EU may be needed.

Legal Support for Business in Georgia

Illustration to the section "Legal Support for Business in Georgia" in the article "Georgia as an Alternative Jurisdiction Instead of MiCA"
Comprehensive legal support for business in Georgia includes not only registration and licensing but also support on financial reporting, auditing, and corporate governance in cross-border structures. COREDO’s practice shows: timely implementation of compliance automation processes and preparation for auditing are key to the long-term sustainability of a business.

Reporting and Audit Requirements for Companies

For crypto companies in Georgia, requirements are set for annual financial reporting according to international standards (IFRS), mandatory auditing for companies with foreign capital, and transparency in corporate governance. The audit of crypto company activities is conducted by independent auditors, ensuring trust among investors and partners.

Compliance Tools for Crypto Business in Georgia

Modern tools for automating compliance and monitoring allow:

  • Real-time financial transaction monitoring
  • Automating customer onboarding procedures and beneficiary identification
  • Reducing compliance risks through integration with international databases
Solutions implemented by the COREDO team allow clients to minimize compliance costs and increase the efficiency of corporate governance.

Georgia vs MiCA: How to Choose a Jurisdiction?

  • Define the strategic goals and scale of the business: for a quick start and flexible regulation, Georgia is the optimal choice.
  • Study the AML/KYC and corporate governance requirements, prepare internal policies, and regulations.
  • Consider registration in the Free Industrial Zone for tax optimization and access to international markets.
  • Prepare a complete set of documents for account opening and license acquisition in advance.
  • Implement compliance process automation and regularly update internal policies considering legislative changes.
  • Consult with COREDO experts to minimize legal risks and strategically plan entry into new markets.

Entrepreneur Questions Answered

Georgia company registration is a fast and transparent process, allowing crypto businesses to access international markets at minimal costs. MiCA’s alternative in the form of Georgian jurisdiction is suitable for companies focused on flexibility, speed, and an individual approach to taxation.

Legal business support in Georgia includes all stages: from registration to audit and compliance automation. Among the legal risks when choosing a jurisdiction are potential difficulties with integration into international payment systems and the need to comply with EU standards when scaling.

For registering a crypto business in Georgia, you will need:

  • Charter and beneficiary information
  • Proof of funds sources
  • Description of the business model and AML/KYC procedures
Difficulties may arise when integrating Georgian companies with international payment systems. Nonetheless, COREDO’s practice shows that competent preparation and support minimize these barriers.

Crypto Business in Georgia: Registration and Operations

Which banks in Georgia open accounts for foreign companies in the crypto asset sector?

Bank of Georgia, TBC Bank, and Liberty Bank provide corporate services for crypto businesses, subject to advanced due diligence and a transparent ownership structure.

What are the requirements for identifying beneficiaries in Georgia?

Beneficiary identification (UBO) is conducted according to international standards, with mandatory disclosure of the ownership structure, proof of funds sources, and completion of customer onboarding.

What are the features of customer onboarding for foreign clients?

Customer onboarding procedures require providing an expanded set of documents, including passports, proof of address, business information, and funds sources. For non-residents, additional requests from banks and regulators may be possible.

What advantages does the Free Industrial Zone offer for crypto business?

FIZ provides zero taxation, simplified currency operations, and a flexible corporate structure for international business.

How to minimize legal risks when registering a business in Georgia?

It is recommended to conduct a preliminary audit of the corporate structure, prepare internal AML/KYC policies, use compliance automation, and consult with international law experts.
COREDO’s experience proves: competent strategic planning, a deep understanding of international standards, and comprehensive support at all stages are the keys to a successful launch and development of crypto business in Georgia as an alternative jurisdiction instead of MiCA.

International anti-money laundering practices are built upon the understanding of three key stages: placement, layering, and integration. Each of these stages uses specific money laundering techniques, and schemes are becoming increasingly complex with technological advancement and heightened regulatory scrutiny.

Introduction of funds into the financial system – how does it work?

At this stage, illicit proceeds enter the legal financial circuit for the first time. Commonly used methods include:

  • Cash transactions: Depositing large sums through cash-intensive businesses (restaurants, car washes, pawnshops), breaking down amounts into small tranches (transaction structuring or smurfing), and depositing cash via ATMs and terminals.
  • Cash transportation: Courier delivery across borders, use of prepaid cards and anonymous payment tools.
COREDO’s practice confirms that it is crucial to implement systems for detecting suspicious transactions and cash operations control during the placement stage. In several cases, the COREDO team assisted clients from the EU and Singapore in establishing automated monitoring, which helped identify attempts to split large sums and prevent further involvement of funds in laundering schemes.

SEO Keywords: cash operations control, detection of suspicious transactions, cash transportation, cash-intensive businesses

Further actions for legalizing proceeds involve using multi-layered schemes – more about the layering stage in the next section.

Multi-layered schemes in Layering

In the second stage, layering: funds go through a series of complex operations to conceal their origin:

  • International transfers through offshore companies (shell companies): Using complex corporate structures, registering companies abroad in low-transparency jurisdictions, hiding beneficial owners.
  • Invoice fraud and trade financing: Creating fictitious contracts, inflating or deflating the value of goods and services, manipulating invoice fraud.
  • Transaction structuring (smurfing): Splitting large sums into multiple smaller transfers through different accounts and countries.
Solutions implemented by COREDO for clients in the Czech Republic and Cyprus included comprehensive financial monitoring, enabling tracking of layering schemes through anomaly analysis in transaction structures and automatic reconciliation of information about beneficial owners.

SEO Keywords: international money laundering schemes, financial monitoring, fund transfer through offshore companies, invoice fraud, trade financing, transaction structuring

What is the legalization of criminal proceeds?

At the integration stage, laundered funds return to the economy as legitimate income:

  • Real estate investments: Purchasing luxury residential and commercial real estate, often through front structures or affiliated persons.
  • Purchase of luxury items: Paintings, cars, antiques, jewelry.
  • Integration of funds into legitimate business: Financing startups, acquiring stakes in companies, issuing loans.
COREDO’s experience shows that at this stage, many international companies face corporate risks associated with the legalization of proceeds through real estate and luxury items. Implementing multi-level due diligence and real estate transaction analysis helps to identify and prevent such schemes.

SEO Keywords: legalization of proceeds through real estate, corporate risks, real estate investments, purchase of luxury items, integration of funds into legitimate business

Money Laundering Schemes in 2024–2025

Illustration for the section "Money Laundering Schemes in 2024–2025" in the article "The Most Popular Methods of Money Laundering"
Modern money laundering methods are becoming more technological and international. Over the past two years, the COREDO team has noted an increase in the use of digital currencies, trade financing, and legal schemes for fund withdrawal.

SEO Keywords: popular money laundering schemes, money laundering methods, financial crimes, anti-money laundering, AML, digital currencies and crypto-assets, trade financing, lawsuits as a tool for fund withdrawal, international payment systems, whistleblowing

Money laundering through trade

Trade-Based Money Laundering (TBML): one of the most difficult methods to detect. Essence: manipulating contracts, invoices, and the value of goods in international trade:
  • Invoice fraud: Inflating or deflating costs, fictitious deliveries, using layering to obscure traces.
  • Manipulation with contracts and goods: Discrepancy between actual and declared volumes, delivery of non-existent goods.
In one of COREDO’s cases, supporting a client from the EU, a TBML scheme was identified through the integration of automated invoice analysis and trade financing monitoring. This allowed preventing the legalization of a large sum through fictitious export operations.

SEO Keywords: money laundering through trade, invoice fraud, international schemes, layering, invoice fraud, trade financing, manipulation with contracts and goods

Offshore and shell companies – what is it?

Shell companies, a classic tool for hiding beneficiaries and complicating corporate structures. Registering companies abroad in offshore jurisdictions allows for creating ownership chains, making financial monitoring and control challenging.
  • Hidden beneficiaries: Using nominee directors, trust structures, corporate secretaries.
  • Registration in countries with low transparency: Cyprus, Belize, BVI, Estonia.
The COREDO team has implemented projects to disclose beneficial owners for clients from the UK and Singapore using international databases and KYC automation. This approach not only complies with regulatory requirements in the EU and Asia but also minimizes corporate risks.

SEO Keywords: use of shell companies, registration of companies abroad, corporate transparency, offshore jurisdictions, hidden beneficiaries, corporate structure

Money laundering through cryptocurrency: schemes

Since 2024, there has been a sharp increase in schemes related to money laundering through cryptocurrency:
  • Anonymous transactions: Using mixers, P2P platforms, crypto cards.
  • Cybercrime: Extortion, phishing, hacks followed by fund withdrawal through digital currencies.
  • Monitoring automation: Modern AML tools allow blockchain analysis and detection of suspicious transfer chains.
Solutions developed at COREDO include blockchain analytics implementation and automation of crypto operations monitoring for clients in Dubai and Singapore. This approach ensures early detection of suspicious transactions and reduces the risk of legal liability.

SEO Keywords: money laundering through cryptocurrency, digital currencies and crypto-assets, detection of suspicious transactions, crypto cards, anonymous transactions, cybercrime, monitoring automation

Cash operations and prepaid cards

Despite the development of digital technologies, cash operations and prepaid card schemes remain relevant:
  • Courier cash delivery: Cross-border transfers, division of sums.
  • Anonymous payment tools: Prepaid cards, e-wallets without identification.
COREDO’s experience shows that effective control of cash operations and limiting anonymous tools significantly reduces the risks of a company becoming involved in money laundering schemes.

SEO Keywords: cash operations control, prepaid card schemes, courier cash delivery, anonymous payment tools

Legalization of income through real estate

Real estate and luxury items remain a favorite way to integrate laundered funds:
  • Investment in luxury real estate: Often through offshore structures or front persons.
  • Purchase of art, cars, antiques: Complexity of valuation, high liquidity.
COREDO’s practice confirms that thorough due diligence and analysis of real estate transactions allow for identifying attempts to legalize criminal proceeds at early stages.

SEO Keywords: legalization of income through real estate, financial crimes, investment in luxury real estate, purchase of art, cars, antiques

Litigation schemes and fictitious lawsuits

In recent years, there has been an increase in the use of lawsuits as a tool for fund withdrawal:
  • Fictitious debts and court rulings: Creating artificial obligations, recovering funds under fraudulent contracts.
  • Legalization through court processes: Transferring funds based on foreign court decisions.
The COREDO team has supported investigations to identify such schemes in the EU, allowing to minimize risks for clients and ensuring legal protection of assets.

SEO Keywords: lawsuits as a tool for fund withdrawal, international money laundering schemes, fictitious debts, legalization through court decisions

Industries vulnerable to money laundering in the EU, Asia, and CIS

Illustration for the section "Industries vulnerable to money laundering in the EU, Asia, and CIS" in the article "The Most Popular Methods of Money Laundering"

Comprehensive analysis of corporate risks shows that no company operating in international markets is immune to involvement in money laundering schemes – particularly in industries with high cash turnover and complex payment structures.

SEO Keywords: corporate money laundering risks, business risks in the EU and Asia, anti-money laundering, industries with high cash turnover, registration of companies abroad, financial sanctions, EU and Asia regulatory requirements

Vulnerable industries and companies

  • Restaurants, car washes, pawnshops: High cash turnover, complexity of control.
  • Luxury goods trading: High value, low transparency of transactions.
  • Offshore structures: Use of shell companies to hide beneficiaries.
  • Charitable organizations: Weak control over funding sources.
The COREDO team regularly conducts due diligence for companies in these sectors, identifying corporate risks and developing individual AML strategies.

SEO Keywords: popular money laundering schemes, due diligence for companies, restaurants, car washes, pawnshops, luxury goods trading, offshore structures, charitable organizations

Regional differences and new challenges 2025

  • Regulatory sandboxes and digital client identification: Regulatory sandboxes and digital KYC tools are actively implemented in Asia and the EU.
  • International cooperation on AML: Strengthening information exchange between regulators, integrating OFAC and EU sanction lists.
  • Increased transparency requirements: New FATF standards and local regulatory requirements demand the disclosure of beneficiaries and automation of due diligence.
COREDO’s solutions for implementing AML policies in international business allow clients to effectively adapt to new challenges, minimizing risks and ensuring compliance with the requirements of different jurisdictions.

SEO Keywords: international money laundering schemes, implementation of AML policies in international business, regulatory sandboxes, digital client identification, international AML cooperation

AML technologies: how to detect money laundering

Illustration for the section "AML technologies: how to detect money laundering" in the article "The Most Popular Methods of Money Laundering"

The technological breakthrough of recent years has radically changed the approach to combating money laundering. Automation, artificial intelligence, and big data analytics are becoming key tools for effective AML.

SEO Keywords: AML, compliance and AML, financial monitoring, automation of AML processes, artificial intelligence in detecting suspicious operations, real-time transaction monitoring, digital client identification, internal AML audit, KYC, bank suspicious activity reports, due diligence automation

Transaction monitoring and fraud detection

  • Monitoring automation: Using algorithms for real-time transaction analysis, detecting anomalies and patterns characteristic of layering and smurfing schemes.
  • Risk management in AML: Assessing risks by countries, counterparties, industries.
  • Financial intelligence (FIU): Interaction with national and international bodies, filing SAR (Suspicious Activity Reports).
Solutions implemented by COREDO in Estonia and the UK allowed clients to automate the monitoring of suspicious operations, reducing the workload on compliance departments and improving the quality of financial control.

SEO Keywords: detection of suspicious transactions, control of financial flows, monitoring automation, risk management in AML, financial intelligence

KYC/AML for international companies

  • Digital client identification: Use of biometrics, electronic documents, global databases.
  • Integration of AML into business processes: Implementing KYC and compliance control at all stages of working with clients and counterparties.
  • Internal audit and control: Conducting regular checks, personnel training, due diligence automation.
COREDO’s experience shows that the integration of KYC/AML into business processes without losing efficiency is possible only through proper automation and clear regulation of procedures.

SEO Keywords: implementation of AML policies in international business, compliance control, digital client identification, integration of AML into business processes, internal audit and control

In the context of tightening regulatory requirements, automation becomes a key element of successful AML policy implementation in international business. Next, we will look at how modern solutions based on artificial intelligence and machine learning transform AML and compliance control processes.

AI and machine learning in AML

  • Financial flow analysis: AI systems detect anomalies, build client profiles, and predict risks.
  • Detection of complex schemes: Machine learning allows identifying new money laundering methods, including layering and smurfing.
  • Modern AML technologies: Use of cloud platforms, integration with international databases.
COREDO’s solutions for integrating AI into AML processes have already proven their effectiveness in practice: automation enabled clients to identify schemes that previously remained unnoticed even during manual checks.

SEO Keywords: artificial intelligence in detecting suspicious operations, automation of AML processes, financial flow analysis, anomaly detection, modern AML technologies

Liability for AML violations and sanctions

Illustration for the section "Liability for AML violations and sanctions" in the article "The Most Popular Methods of Money Laundering"

Violations of AML requirements lead not only to fines but also to criminal liability, account blocking, and inclusion in sanction lists.

SEO Keywords: legal AML support, corporate liability for AML violations, anti-money laundering, financial sanctions, sanction lists, EU and Asia regulatory requirements, lawsuits, whistleblowing, internal investigations

Responsibility and fines for companies

  • Criminal and administrative liability: In the EU and Asia, fines for AML violations reach tens of millions of euros, possible disqualification of management, and criminal prosecution.
  • Long-term consequences for business: Loss of licenses, account blocking, inclusion in OFAC and EU sanction lists, reputational losses.
The COREDO team supports clients at all stages – from implementing AML policies to protecting interests in investigations and lawsuits.

SEO Keywords: corporate liability, financial crimes, criminal and administrative liability, long-term consequences for business

AML check, how to prepare?

  • Internal audit: Regular process checks, due diligence automation, preparation for regulatory inspections.
  • Implementation of AML policies: Development and update of internal documents, personnel training, integration of new technologies.
  • Preparation for regulatory inspection: Document collection, business process analysis, system stress testing.
Projects implemented by COREDO in the Czech Republic and Singapore showed that a systematic approach to preparing for AML checks minimizes risks and avoids sanctions.

SEO Keywords: due diligence for companies, implementation of AML policies, internal audit, due diligence automation, preparation for regulatory inspection

How to protect business from money laundering

Illustration for the section "How to protect business from money laundering" in the article "The Most Popular Methods of Money Laundering"
Based on years of experience, the COREDO team recommends:

  • Implementing best AML practices: Use international FATF standards, regularly update internal policies.
  • Developing risk management: Assess risks for each business area, implement an early warning system.
  • Ensuring corporate transparency: Disclose beneficiaries, automate KYC and due diligence.
  • Strengthening international cooperation: Use global databases, exchange information with partners and regulators.
  • Integrating KYC and AML into all business processes: Automation and digitization of procedures – the key to efficiency and compliance.

Advice for international business

  • AML is not just a regulatory requirement but a strategic tool for business protection.
  • Combating money laundering requires a systematic approach: from technology implementation to continuous personnel training.
  • Corporate risks can only be minimized under the conditions of transparency, automation, and regular internal audit.
  • Use modern monitoring tools, artificial intelligence, and international standards to enhance AML effectiveness.
  • Be proactive: timely integration of KYC and AML, preparation for inspections, and collaboration with COREDO experts are the keys to your business’s sustainability on the international stage.

Methods of money laundering and their detection

Money laundering method Description/Example Key business risks Effective AML tools
Trade financing Invoice fraud, layering High Transaction monitoring, AI, due diligence
Use of offshore companies Shell companies, hidden beneficiaries Medium KYC, corporate transparency
Cryptocurrencies and digital assets Anonymous transfers, crypto cards Very high Blockchain analytics, monitoring automation
Cash operations and prepaid cards Courier delivery, anonymous cards Medium Cash operations control, limits, reporting
Legalization through real estate Purchase of luxury real estate, luxury items High Transaction analysis, beneficiary control

SEO Keywords of the section: AML, combating money laundering, corporate risks, main insights, practical steps, risk minimization, transparency enhancement, automation, and technology

This article is not just a review but a practical guide based on COREDO’s real expertise. If you are interested in protecting your business and finding reliable solutions, the COREDO team is ready to share its expertise and support you at every stage of international company development.

Registering a cryptocurrency company in Costa Rica opens up flexible business opportunities in a jurisdiction with a favorable economic environment and modern regulations. The country’s economic stability and liberal approach to cryptocurrencies make Costa Rica an attractive choice for starting and further developing a crypto business.

Economic Stability and Regulation

Costa Rica has long established itself as a stable and innovation-friendly jurisdiction. Cryptocurrency companies operate under a territorial tax principle here: taxes are only levied on income earned within the country, allowing international operators to optimize their tax burden. Minimal capital requirements and the absence of mandatory audits for most companies make starting a business quick and cost-effective.

COREDO practice confirms: registering a crypto business abroad through Costa Rica allows clients not only to legalize digital assets but also to build a transparent corporate governance structure that complies with international FATF standards and AML compliance requirements.

Legalizing Crypto Business in Costa Rica

Strategies for entering the Latin American market through Costa Rica are particularly popular among projects aimed at quick launches and integration with international payment systems. Opening a corporate account for a crypto company in Costa Rica is possible with both local and foreign banks, facilitating cross-border payments and customer interactions from the EU and Asia.

The COREDO team has implemented cases where setting up a cryptocurrency company in Costa Rica allowed a client to start legal operations within 3-4 weeks while fully complying with KYC requirements and investor rights protection. This approach is especially effective for projects dealing with asset tokenization, stablecoins, and VASP (Virtual Asset Service Providers).

Buy a Cryptocurrency Company in Costa Rica

For those interested in the fastest market entry, a ready-made cryptocurrency company in Costa Rica is the optimal solution. The key stage here becomes due diligence: checking the legal purity of the company, transaction history, status concerning financial intelligence (UIF), and no restrictions from regulators.

Our experience at COREDO has shown that purchasing a ready-made company with a transparent history and properly executed corporate documents not only speeds up the launch but also minimizes risks for investors. It is important to ensure the protection of all participants’ rights and compliance with international AML/KYC standards.

Registering a Crypto Company in Costa Rica

Illustration for the section "Registering a Crypto Company in Costa Rica" in the article "Cryptocurrency Company in Costa Rica instead of MiCA"

Registering a crypto company in Costa Rica provides access to a stable business climate and loyal regulations for blockchain projects. To take advantage of these benefits and legally operate in the jurisdiction, it is important to clearly understand the registration stages and licensing requirements. Below are the key steps in setting up a crypto company in Costa Rica.

Registration and Licensing: Stages

Registering a company for crypto operations in Costa Rica involves several key stages:

  • Selecting a unique name and reserving it in the registry.
  • Preparing the company’s charter considering the specifics of cryptocurrency activities.
  • Appointing a director and determining the shareholder structure.
  • Registering as a virtual asset service provider (VASP) if necessary.
  • Setting up a corporate account for the crypto company.
  • Implementing corporate governance and AML compliance policies.

The solution developed by COREDO allows the client to go through all the registration stages with minimal time and financial costs, ensuring legal purity and a transparent structure.

Documents for Registering a Crypto Business

Standard documents required for registering a cryptocurrency company in Costa Rica include:

  • Company charter with a description of activities.
  • Identity documents of shareholders and directors.
  • Address verification.
  • Description of the business model and funding sources.
  • Confirmation of KYC/AML procedures implementation.
  • Licensing documents for crypto operators (if required to handle client funds or conduct ICO/STO).

COREDO’s practice shows: thorough documentation preparation and preliminary due diligence significantly speed up the licensing process and minimize the risk of refusal from banks and regulators.

Corporate Account for Crypto Business in Costa Rica

Opening a corporate account for a cryptocurrency company in Costa Rica requires special attention. Banks and payment providers pay close attention to transaction transparency, source of funds, and AML policy. In some cases, additional coordination with financial intelligence (UIF) and an expanded set of documents are required.

The COREDO team supports clients at all stages of integration with international payment systems, ensuring compliance with due diligence requirements and data protection (GDPR, DPA).

AML and KYC for Crypto Companies in Costa Rica

Illustration for the section "AML and KYC for Crypto Companies in Costa Rica" in the article "Cryptocurrency Company in Costa Rica instead of MiCA"

AML and KYC for crypto companies in Costa Rica are not just legal formalities but important tools for protecting both the company and its clients from financial risks and abuses. As international standards are implemented and the regulatory framework evolves, the Costa Rican government emphasizes transparency and security in crypto transactions.

Implementation of International Standards: Requirements

AML for cryptocurrency companies in Costa Rica is based on FATF recommendations and includes mandatory KYC, CFT procedures, and regular transaction monitoring using blockchain analytics technologies. Compliance and KYC for crypto businesses become integral parts of corporate governance and investor protection rights.

The practical implementation of these requirements requires not only the development of internal policies but also constant staff training, integration with blockchain analytics providers, and regular procedure audits.

Thus, effective execution of these measures lays the foundation for further consideration of the differences between national and European regulatory standards.

AML Requirements Costa Rica and EU: Comparison

Criterion Costa Rica EU (MiCA)
Licensing Requirements Minimal, often not required Strict, mandatory licensing
AML/KYC Basic, FATF-oriented EU standards, high control
Taxation Territorial principle Worldwide income
Registry Openness Closed Open
Work with European Clients Restrictions due to blacklists No restrictions
Reporting Requirements No mandatory audit Audit and reporting mandatory

The comparison between MiCA and Costa Rican legislation shows that despite more flexible requirements in Latin America, working with European clients will require the implementation of additional procedures for data protection (GDPR, DPA) and transaction transparency.

Transparency and Compliance Outside the EU

Transparency of transactions and investor rights protection when operating outside the EU are achieved through the implementation of corporate governance, internal control, and regular due diligence. Managing reputational risks requires constant monitoring of legislative changes and integration with international AML and KYC systems.

COREDO practice confirms: using blockchain analytics technologies and independent auditors ensures compliance even in the absence of formal audit requirements.

Cryptocurrency Regulation: Costa Rica and EU

Illustration for the section "Cryptocurrency Regulation: Costa Rica and EU" in the article "Cryptocurrency Company in Costa Rica instead of MiCA"

cryptocurrency regulation: Costa Rica and EU, this is a vivid example of how different countries approach digital assets. Let us examine the main features of regulatory models to understand the principles underlying the policies of Costa Rica and the European Union and how they affect the cryptocurrency market.

Key Differences in Approaches

Cryptocurrency regulation in the EU (MiCA) is built on the principle of strict licensing, mandatory audit, and open registries. In Costa Rica, the approach is more flexible: Licensing of crypto operators is only required for certain activities, and corporate governance can be tailored to the needs of the business.

For companies focused on the legalization of digital assets, tokenization, and conducting ICO/STO, Costa Rica offers a quicker and less costly path to market entry. However, when working with clients from the EU, compliance with MiCA standards and the implementation of additional consumer protection procedures will be required.

Risks of Operating Outside MiCA

Operating outside MiCA opens up new possibilities for scaling a crypto business but also carries certain risks:

  • Restrictions on working with European clients due to blacklists.
  • The need to independently implement AML and KYC standards.
  • Increased scrutiny from banks and investors regarding the legal purity of the company.
  • Possible difficulties in cross-border payments and integration with European payment systems.

A solution implemented by COREDO for one of its clients allowed minimizing legal risks by implementing international AML standards and engaging independent auditors to confirm transaction transparency.

Corporate Taxation and Management

The territorial principle of taxation in Costa Rica allows optimizing the tax burden for international crypto businesses. Transparency of operations is achieved through the implementation of internal control and corporate governance, and the absence of mandatory auditing reduces administrative costs.

The COREDO team recommends implementing internal control procedures and regular audits during the registration phase to increase trust from investors and partners.

Thus, a comprehensive approach to internal procedures will be the key to a successful launch and effective operation of the company in Costa Rica.

Launching a Cryptocurrency Company in Costa Rica

Illustration for the section "Launching a Cryptocurrency Company in Costa Rica" in the article "Cryptocurrency Company in Costa Rica instead of MiCA"

Launching a cryptocurrency company in Costa Rica offers unique opportunities due to flexible regulation, accessible taxation, and the ease of registration. It is essential to consider local market features and activity legalization requirements before scaling the business to ensure stable market entry and successful project development.

Scaling the Business and Market Launch

Scaling a crypto business outside the EU requires a clear strategy for quick market entry, integration with international payment systems, and the implementation of KYC/AML procedures at a level comparable to European standards. Choosing a reliable consulting partner becomes a key success factor.

The solution implemented by COREDO includes comprehensive support at all stages – from selecting the optimal corporate structure to assistance with account opening and blockchain analytics integration.

How to Reduce Legal and Reputational Risks

Minimizing legal risks when registering a crypto company in Costa Rica is achieved by:

  • Conducting expanded due diligence on all participants.
  • Implementing international AML/KYC standards.
  • Regular auditing of operations and transparency of the corporate structure.
  • Protecting investors’ rights through the implementation of internal policies and procedures.

The COREDO team accompanies clients at all stages, helping to build a reputation risk management system and ensure the legal purity of the company.

Mistakes When Choosing a Jurisdiction

Typical mistakes include underestimating jurisdictional risk assessment, a formal approach to compliance, and the absence of independent audits. The legal purity of the company and transaction transparency must be confirmed not only by internal procedures but also by external auditors.

COREDO’s experience shows that thorough preparation and a comprehensive compliance approach allow avoiding most mistakes and ensuring long-term business sustainability.

Main Conclusions and Recommendations

Illustration for the section "Main Conclusions and Recommendations" in the article "Cryptocurrency Company in Costa Rica instead of MiCA"

A cryptocurrency company in Costa Rica: this is not just an alternative to MiCA for cryptocurrency companies but a strategic tool for quick international market entry, tax burden optimization, and minimizing administrative barriers. choosing a jurisdiction should be based on a deep risk assessment, transparent corporate structure, and readiness to integrate international AML/KYC standards.

COREDO practice confirms: comprehensive business support, due diligence implementation, and constant monitoring of regulatory changes allow not only the legalization of crypto business in Latin America but also ensure its long-term sustainability and investment attractiveness.

If your goal is scaling a crypto business outside the EU, protecting investor rights, and ensuring transaction transparency, Costa Rica becomes one of the most promising jurisdictions. The COREDO team is ready to offer practical solutions tailored to the specifics of your project and international market requirements.