Coredo

I have been leading COREDO since 2016 and see every day how entrepreneurs in Europe, Asia and the CIS countries balance the need to protect privacy with the duty of full transparency towards banks and regulators. Nominee services for companies are a finely tuned instrument. They work when AML/KYC methodology is observed, powers are properly documented and economic substance is established; and they also carry significant legal, tax and reputational risks if implemented carelessly.

Over the years the COREDO team has delivered projects in the EU, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Cyprus and Estonia, as well as in the United Kingdom, Singapore and Dubai. We’ve taken clients through the full cycle, from company formation and bank account opening to obtaining financial licenses and an independent AML audit. In this article I combine COREDO’s practice and the regulatory novelties of 2024–2026 to give you a practical roadmap for nominee service taking into account beneficial ownership registers, economic substance requirements and evolving rules on information exchange.

Why do entrepreneurs need nominee service?

Nominee director and nominee shareholder: these are appointed persons, formally holding positions and/or owning shares on behalf of the beneficiary (beneficial owner). Nominee holder services are used for operational flexibility, protection from competitors’ intrusive attention, and structuring corporate governance when operating in multiple jurisdictions. A proper nominee arrangement does not change economic control and does not conceal the UBO; it allocates functions and formalizes agency powers.

Boundary of control, the key criterion. The nominee’s agency powers should not turn into de facto management of the business without oversight by the beneficiary. When a nominee makes strategic decisions and the documents do not record mechanisms for instructions and reporting, there is a risk of requalification of control and of questions regarding substance and tax residency.

Regulatory outlook 2024–2026

The overview of regulatory changes for 2024–2026 reveals key trends toward tighter control and greater transparency requirements for corporate structures. Below we examine in detail what changed in nominee service practice in 2026 and what this means for compliance and operations.

What changed in nominee service in 2026?

By 2026, regulation of nominees in the EU and leading international centers is becoming more detailed. Beneficial ownership registers in the EU are evolving after restrictions on public access: access remains available to obliged entities (banks, corporate service providers) and regulators, and data verification standards are being tightened. COREDO’s practice confirms that even with formally closed registers, requests from banks and FIU (Financial Intelligence Unit) require the same depth of transparency as in 2022–2023.

Beneficial ownership registers in 2026 will likely receive improved APIs for inter‑agency exchange, and the obligation to update data within short timeframes will become standard. In the UK Company House is strengthening verification controls, and in a number of EU countries a preliminary KYC‑filter is being implemented when submitting UBO data, which increases the responsibility of the applicant and the provider.

Impact of CRS, FATCA and BEPS on nominee

CRS (Common Reporting Standard) and FATCA continue to act as an “X‑ray” for cross‑border shareholders and accounts. From 2026, active integration of the Crypto‑Asset Reporting Framework (CARF) by a number of jurisdictions is expected, which will erase the illusion of “invisibility” of operations with tokenized shares and corporate wallets. In COREDO projects we are already implementing CARF‑compatible processes in corporate and licensed crypto structures in Cyprus, Estonia and Singapore.

AML and nominee service: a guide

With tightening AML requirements, nominee service providers and their clients are forced to implement robust compliance procedures. This practical guide focuses on KYC/CDD/EDD and UBO identification, explaining the steps necessary to manage risks and meet regulatory requirements.

Know Your Customer / Customer Due Diligence / Enhanced Due Diligence: identification of the Ultimate Beneficial Owner

From the Anti‑Money Laundering (AML) compliance perspective, a nominee is a risk‑enhancing factor, meaning an increased level of scrutiny is required. KYC / CDD procedures for nominees include identity verification, source of funds and source of wealth checks, confirmation of professional background, and independent reference letters. Apply Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) for nominal holders if there are offshore elements, complex chains or politically exposed persons (PEP screening).

AML requirements for nominee services

To comply with AML for nominee service, formalize: a nominee agreement, a powers matrix, an instructions policy, a reporting regime, and control measures. FIU reporting and SARs (suspicious activity reports) should be integrated into both the provider’s and the company’s procedures, with escalation thresholds and training for responsible staff. The COREDO team implements record‑keeping obligations and statutory registers as living documents: instruction protocols, a powers of attorney issuance log, a shareholder register and a UBO register synchronized with the jurisdiction’s registers.

Reducing false positives in AML software

A modern compliance ecosystem is not a set of disjointed tools. We integrate KYC, sanctions screening and transaction monitoring into a single platform to avoid data fragmentation and interpretation errors. Real‑time monitoring of sanctions and media risks, transaction patterns, alerting and subsequent incident investigations are combined and documented in case management.

False positives are inevitable, but their ratio is an important KPI. Optimizing screening rules, contextual lists and regular scenario calibration help reduce “noise”. COREDO’s practice shows that a risk‑based approach, combined with regular model testing (model validation), shortens the onboarding cycle without compromising control quality.

Tax aspects of economic substance

The concept of Economic substance today serves as a measure of genuine business activity and directly affects the tax aspects of companies operating in international jurisdictions. In the following points we will examine in detail what substance requirements are imposed on companies with nominees and what consequences their non-compliance entails.

Substance for companies with nominees

Tax mobility and the place of tax residency depend on where key decisions are made and where value is created. When a nominee director signs but the real management is abroad, this is a risk of reclassification. Formalize “reasonable measures” to prevent discrepancies: technological meeting logs, geotags, local contracts and evidence of available resources.

Tax risks of using a nominee service

Tax risks of nominee service include requalification of beneficial ownership and disputes over the applicability of double tax treaties. How to prove the absence of control by a nominee shareholder? Through a nominee agreement, custodial holding of share certificates, confirmation of lack of dividend interest and documented instructions from the UBO. The tax consequences of transferring shares to a nominee in EU countries require an assessment of dividend withholding, rules on counterparties with significant participation and anti‑abuse provisions.

Contractual guarantees

Contractual guarantees and legal instruments are necessary to minimize risks when transferring rights and managing corporate assets. Below we will move on to practical schemes and drafting features, including the nominee agreement and best practices within EU law.

Best practices for a nominee agreement in the EU

A nominee agreement template should include an obligation to fully disclose the UBO to regulators and banks if required by law. For the beneficiary it is important to have the right to immediate replacement of the nominee in case of breach of AML‑policies, and for the provider – the right to suspend execution of instructions upon sanctions and AML triggers. Such symmetric mechanisms reduce the systemic risk for both parties.

Escrow and powers of attorney: the digital trail

Blockchain notarization and using blockchain to store records of nominee agreements is a workable option to ensure immutability of records, especially in cross‑border disputes. Smart contracts for automating nominee terms remain a niche tool, but we already see cases where smart escrow records the occurrence of conditions for transfer of control or dividends.

Sanctions and criminal risks

The legal consequences of hiding the UBO in 2026 are only intensifying: regulators actively exchange data, and banks fine for false declarations. At COREDO we include in contracts an obligation of immediate notification of sanctions events and a trigger for restructuring with the involvement of an external sanctions adviser.

Operational scenarios: from account to M&A

Operational scenarios cover a wide range of tasks: from managing a bank account to supporting M&A, and require coordinated processes, automation and strict risk controls. Below we consider bank KYC and cross-border governance as key elements of compliance and operational resilience.

Bank KYC: cross-border governance

Interaction with bank KYC during account opening is the most sensitive stage. The bank will request a full package: nominee agreement, appointment minutes, UBO confirmations, source of funds and substance arguments. Our experience at COREDO has shown that early engagement with the bank and providing a transparent structure map increase the likelihood of opening an account in the Czech Republic, Estonia, the United Kingdom and Singapore.

Cross-border corporate governance and corporate law require consistency: where statutory registers are kept, how nominees are appointed and removed, and which law applies to the shareholders’ agreement. Inconsistency creates delays and red flags with banks and regulators.

M&A, public deals, alternatives to nominee

Legal risks from using a nominee in M&A transactions are related to representations and warranties (W&I), disclosure of the ultimate owner and synchronization of voting and dividend rights. Rules for disclosing the ultimate owner in public transactions are stricter and often incompatible with anonymizing structures. We incorporate into the SPA mechanisms for phased UBO disclosure and escrow unwind upon confirmation of control.

Alternatives to nominee service – trust, corporate secretary, agency agreements with limited functions. Sometimes it is more sensible to split roles: the secretary maintains the registers, the agent: narrow functions, and the director: only operational signatures. Such modularity reduces concentration of risk in a single person.

Digital Identification Technologies

Modern digital identification technologies are reshaping methods of identity verification and access management, combining user convenience with security and compliance requirements. Below we will examine in detail the key elements of this ecosystem – e‑KYC, the eIDAS regulations and remote onboarding practices: to understand their significance for businesses and customers.

eKYC, eIDAS and remote onboarding

Digital identification and e‑KYC capabilities for nominees radically accelerate processes. eIDAS and qualified e‑signatures make it possible to conduct board decisions and sign nominee agreements remotely with strong evidentiary weight. Remote onboarding and biometric verification shorten onboarding timelines while maintaining reliability and creating a clear digital trail.

Contract Storage and Smart Contracts

Using blockchain to store records of nominee agreements provides immutability and verifiability. Smart contracts automate conditions for the transfer of rights, execution of instructions, or payment of fees tied to KPIs. While such solutions do not replace a legal contract, they create a strong audit trail and reduce operational errors.

Data retention policies establish retention periods and access controls. Data governance is not only a matter of security but also evidence of good faith in disputes and FIU audits.

How to choose a nominee service provider

При выборе провайдера nominee service важно сочетать проверку репутации и способность контролировать качество предоставляемых услуг. Раздел о due diligence и лицензировании подскажет, какие документы, проверки и стандарты должны быть на первом месте при сравнении кандидатов.

Provider due diligence

Как выбрать провайдера nominee service с минимальным риском? Проверьте Licensing провайдеров корпоративных услуг в соответствующей юрисдикции, репутацию, наличие PI insurance, независимый аудит AML‑процессов и состав комплаенс‑команды. Контроль качества провайдеров – due diligence checklist: KYC‑процедуры, санкционный скрининг, training‑планы, case management, incident response, GDPR‑политики и отчётность в FIU.

Service economics: fee structure, ROI and TCO

Коммерческая модель nominee: прозрачная fee structure, привязанная к обязанностям и SLA, плюс success‑fees за сложные кейсы (например, лицензирование). Оценивайте TCO (total cost of ownership) nominee решений: базовые гонорары, расходы на AML‑ПО, аудит, юридические апдейты, резерв на кризисное управление. ROI – это не только экономия времени, но и снижение вероятности задержек с банком и штрафов регулятора.

Метрики эффективности: время онбординга, заполненность dossier по UBO, доля отклонённых банковских заявок, время реакции на санкционные алерты. Управление репутационным риском и KPI кризисного менеджмента, подготовленные пресс‑брифы, контактные лица, таймлайн эскалации и сценарии замены номинала.

COREDO Case Studies

In one of the projects in Estonia, the client was launching a licensed virtual assets provider and insisted on a nominee director until the permanent one was approved. We carried out Enhanced Due Diligence (EDD) for the nominee, integrated e‑KYC, prepared a nominee agreement with clear limits and document escrow. The bank in Tallinn requested an additional audit trail: the solution developed at COREDO provided synchronization of instructions with board meetings and AML‑platform logs, and the account was opened without delays.

Third example: a holding in Dubai with operations in the EU and the UK. The sanctions landscape was changing, and the client feared payment blocks. The COREDO team implemented real‑time sanctions monitoring, updated KYC for nominees, implemented conflict of interest rules and approved crisis scenarios. When one of the counterparties was added to extended lists, an alert fired within an hour, and we timely filed the SAR notification and restructured the payment flow.

Scaling nominee services across jurisdictions

Scaling a business using nominee services in multiple jurisdictions requires a compliance matrix: UBO registers in the EU and international registries, local AML rules, substance and banking practices. Management of conflicts of interest between the beneficiary and the nominee is formalized through a code of conduct, independent compliance and regular reports to the board.

Information exchange between jurisdictions and ML/TF risks increase as the network of companies grows. Integrating KYC, sanctions and transaction monitoring into a single platform accelerates data consolidation and provides an end-to-end audit trail. The impact of CRS and FATCA on nominee structures in multi-tiered schemes requires a risk map, which we update in line with OECD and EU releases.

How to safely launch a nominee service

1. Need assessment. Determine whether a nominee is truly necessary, or whether alternatives will suffice: a corporate secretary, an agency agreement, a trust for specific assets.
2. Structuring. Describe the corporate structure, control boundaries, substance and tax residency.
3. Provider selection. Conduct due diligence on the provider, check licenses, AML processes, PI insurance and reporting.
4. Documentation. Prepare a nominee agreement, an authority matrix, POA, escrow mechanics, an instructions policy and a conflicts of interest policy.
5. AML/KYC. Implement CDD/EDD, UBO identification, PEP screening, sanctions compliance, FIU/SAR procedures and record‑keeping obligations.
6. Banks. Agree with the bank in advance the document package, substance arguments and UBO disclosure.
7. Technology. Set up an integrated AML platform, e‑KYC, e‑signatures, case management and performance metrics.
8. Monitoring. Introduce KPIs, regular reviews of UBO registers, contract reviews and updates based on regulator responses in 2024–2026.
9. Crisis plan. Provide for replacement of the nominee, sanctions scenarios, communications and legal support for the nominee service.
10. Audit. Conduct periodic independent audits and forensic accounting where there are signs of irregularities or at the request of the bank/regulator.

Conclusions

Nominee service: it is a corporate governance tool, not a way to hide the beneficial owner. Its effectiveness in 2026 is measured by transparency, the quality of AML/KYC, economic substance and readiness for cross-border data exchange under CRS, FATCA and new digital standards. When nominee services for companies are structured according to best practices, they accelerate scaling, protect operational processes and reduce friction in banking and regulatory interactions.

At COREDO I see the task not as “finding a nominee”, but as building a resilient architecture: legal documents, a verifiable economic reality, a digital footprint and a unified compliance platform. Our experience confirms: thoughtful transparency and discipline in the details are the best strategy against regulatory uncertainty and unexpected inspections. If you are planning a structure involving a nominee director or nominee shareholder in the EU, the United Kingdom, Singapore, Dubai, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Cyprus or Estonia, incorporate the 2026 requirements today — you will save time, lower TCO and strengthen the trust of banks and partners.

I see that owners from the EU and Asia often postpone closing due to legal uncertainty, fear of tax scrutiny and concerns about reputation. In this article I will systematically lay out how to close a company in Hong Kong without fines or tax claims, what procedures exist, how long they take and how to build an ROI‑oriented exit strategy. The practice of COREDO confirms: proper preparation and disciplined execution save months and tens of thousands of dollars.

Why and when liquidation is the right move: diagnosis and ROI

Owners most often consider liquidating a Hong Kong company when the business model has changed, the project is migrating to another jurisdiction, the bank has tightened compliance, or maintaining a dormant company has become more expensive than closing it. I start with a diagnosis: financial solvency, risk profile, contractual map, assets and liabilities, tax position and compliance history in the Companies Registry and the Inland Revenue Department (IRD). We at COREDO carry out such an examination in 10–15 working days, using a risk-based methodology.

For managers, ROI matters. I suggest calculating:

• TCO of liquidation (government fees + professional fees + liquidator) vs annual maintenance costs (audit, secretarial services, Business Registration, banking compliance).
• Intangible effects: reduced regulatory risk, relieving directors of liability, release of collateral and bank guarantees.
• Alternatives: sale, merger, restructuring, transfer to dormancy. At COREDO we model the NPV of each scenario over a 3–5 year horizon.

Legal framework: who regulates and which rules apply

Hong Kong relies on:

• Companies Ordinance (Cap. 622) – corporate law, including deregistration (strike‑off).
• Companies (Winding Up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance (Cap. 32), liquidation (winding‑up).
• Competent authorities: Companies Registry (register, publications, registration filings), Inland Revenue Department (taxes, tax clearance), Business Registration Office (business registration certificate), and the Government Gazette (official notices).

Key choice: solvent or insolvent liquidation. This determines the procedure, timelines and requirements for the liquidator.

Three main closure scenarios: from strike-off to compulsory winding-up

Voluntary strike‑off / Deregistration (removal from the register)

Members’ voluntary winding‑up (voluntary solvent liquidation)
Suitable when assets exceed liabilities and the directors sign a Declaration of Solvency. The procedure is transparent and allows distribution of assets to shareholders after debts are paid. Stages include a special resolution of members, appointment of a liquidator, notices to creditors and publication in the Gazette, preparation of final accounts and audit, distribution of funds and de‑registration.

Creditors’ voluntary winding‑up (creditor‑led liquidation)
If the company is insolvent, the directors convene a meeting of creditors. Creditors appoint a liquidator, approve a creditors’ committee and oversee asset realization, including floating charge realization. Notices and the deadline for submitting claims (proof of debt), the order of payment to preferential creditors (preferential creditors), including wage and tax arrears, are especially important here.

Compulsory liquidation (compulsory winding‑up in Hong Kong)

Step-by-step procedure for liquidating a company in Hong Kong: from preparation to publication in the Gazette

Preliminary preparation: audit and clearing “loose ends”

Tax clearance (tax clearance) with IRD

Working with the bank: AML/KYC during closure and account closures

Contracts, leases, IP and data
Contractual unwinding is important to avoid claims:

• Lease termination and break clause handling: agree on early termination and demobilisation of the office, arrange handover of the premises.
• Contract novation and assignment: transfer or terminate obligations without “loose ends”.
• Intellectual property transfer and assignment: transfer rights to software, domains, trademarks; if necessary, to the holding company.
• Data protection: for owners from the EU we take into account the GDPR and local rules on storage of corporate and personal data.

Personnel, salaries and MPF

Communications with creditors
In liquidation we:

• send notices, publish a notice in the Gazette, collect proofs of debt;
• maintain a creditor claims timeline and verify claims;
• conduct negotiations with creditors and settlement strategies, including for secured and unsecured debts;
• observe the payment hierarchy, including preferential creditors, and document all distributions.

Duties and responsibilities of directors and the liquidator

COREDO case studies: how we closed companies in Hong Kong without incurring penalties

Case 1. Voluntary strike‑off for a company with zero activity

Case 2. Step-by-step liquidation of a holding company in Hong Kong

Case 3. Liquidation of an offshore structure in Hong Kong for foreigners with supplier debt

Bank accounts and capital repatriation: how to return funds to investors from the EU and Asia

Timelines, costs and performance metrics

Restoration of a company after strike‑off and reputational risks

Alternatives to liquidation: when to restructure, sell or “put a company to sleep”

Answers to the questions we’re asked most often

• What is the total cost and ROI? Cost is a function of complexity: presence of assets, audit, liquidator. In a simple strike‑off TCO is often less than a year’s company maintenance. ROI shows up in savings of future expenses and reduced risks for directors.
• What risks do owners from Europe and Asia face with improper liquidation? Fines for late filings, creditor claims, difficulties opening accounts in other countries, AML/KYC inquiries from banks and regulators.
• Should one go into compulsory or choose voluntary winding‑up? A voluntary procedure with professional support is almost always better: you control timing, communications and the reputational backdrop.
• How are AML/KYC checks performed during closure and what documents will the bank require? The bank will collect KYC for the director and beneficial owners, confirmations of sources of funds and the distribution plan. We prepare the dossier in advance.
• What notices and clearances does the IRD require? Cessation notice, final tax return, confirmation of settled assessments, and, if necessary, letters regarding withholdings and explanations of transactions.
• Can a company be restored after strike‑off? Yes, through the courts. It’s expensive and time‑consuming; it’s better not to make mistakes during closure.
• What metrics should be evaluated when choosing liquidation vs sale/merger? TCO/ROI, time horizon, legal and tax risks, impact on the group and banking relationships.
• How to protect IP and contractual rights during liquidation? Execute an IP assignment in advance and novate key contracts, secure license agreements and data rights.

Practical checklist for closing operations in Hong Kong

• Strategy and diagnostics: solvent vs insolvent, KPI, ROI, roadmap.
• Corporate actions: special resolution, appointment of liquidator, minutes.
• Regulators: notifications to Companies Registry and Business Registration Office, publications in the Government Gazette.
• Taxes: cessation notice, final tax return, tax clearance certificate, DTA and TP reconciliation.
• Banks: AML/KYC package, bank account closure checklist, confirmations of source of funds.
• Staff: payroll calculations, IR56F/IR56G, MPF closure, letters to employees.
• Contracts and leases: termination/break clause, novation/assignment, handover of office.
• Assets and IP: valuation, disposal, assignment of trademarks/patents/software.
• Creditors: notices, proof of debt, meetings, prioritization and calculations.
• Reporting and audit: final accounts and audit, distribution of assets, final liquidator’s report.
• Archive and records retention: corporate records retention and statutory retention periods.
• Insurance and regulators: cancellation of policies, closure of licences and notifications (Customs/Immigration/Social Security – if applicable).

How COREDO operates on a company closure project in Hong Kong

I believe in a managed, transparent process. At the start we create an engagement plan with milestones and SLAs for communications. The COREDO team implemented a hybrid model: a local licensed liquidator and auditors, international tax and compliance advisers, a project coordinator and a single point of contact for the client. We work in two-week sprints: a progress report, a risk log, the next milestone.

We value a candid tone: if I see a risk of compulsory liquidation or restoration after wrongful strike-off, I flag it immediately and offer options — from negotiations with creditors to an alternative exit through a sale or restructuring. This approach helps owners preserve control of the process and their reputation.

How to close a company in Hong Kong without fines: my short advice

• Don’t delay the diagnosis. Any delay increases project cost.
• Enter the voluntary procedure where possible.
• Prepare the tax clean-up and bank KYC in parallel.
• Document every decision of the directors.
• Maintain transparent communication with creditors and banks.

Conclusion

Liquidating a company in Hong Kong is not just a legal formality. It is a management decision that combines law, taxes, compliance and reputation strategy. My experience and COREDO’s practice confirm: proper preparation, the correct choice of procedure – strike‑off, members’ voluntary or creditors’ voluntary: and careful handling of the IRD, Companies Registry and banks make it possible to conclude the business story neatly and without penalties. If you, as an owner from Europe or Asia, are looking for a way to exit a business in Hong Kong, calculate ROI and minimize risks, rely on a clear plan and professionals who will accompany you through every stage, from the initial diagnosis to the final publication in the Gazette and the closing of accounts. This is exactly the client-side partner role I envision for COREDO, and this is where we are strong.

Since 2016 I have been leading COREDO across dozens of markets in Europe, Asia and the CIS. We have helped clients register legal entities, obtain financial licenses, implement AML‑frameworks and build resilient corporate structures in the EU, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Cyprus, Estonia, the United Kingdom, Singapore and Dubai. Over the past three years Saudi Arabia has come into focus: requests for joint ventures in Saudi Arabia are growing, and with them – the need for practical and reliable schemes of control, compliance and localization (Saudization). I have compiled COREDO’s working methodology in this article: from partner due diligence and the rules for creating a joint venture in Saudi Arabia to calculating OPEX for mandatory Saudization quotas and protecting minority shareholders.

How to Think Strategically Now

Vision 2030 is transforming the KSA economy on all fronts: diversification away from oil, accelerated industrialization, local industrial clusters and economic zones, and a priority on technology transfer and skilled jobs. Our experience at COREDO has shown that strategic investment planning in Saudi Arabia is justified when you address three tasks at once: market access, localization of production/services, and building compliance to participate in public procurement.

The 2020 Foreign Ownership Law in the KSA and related changes to the investment regime have allowed foreign investors to hold equity participation in Saudi Arabia up to 100% in a number of sectors. At the same time, sectoral restrictions on foreign participation remain (energy, security), and the rules for the oil and gas sector and the local partner require a separate assessment of local content and participation in major client initiatives. Here, a Joint Venture often proves to be the optimal structure – you combine control with local presence, meeting the expectations of regulators and clients.

Market Regulators: How to Engage

COREDO’s practice confirms: the map of regulators determines the project’s roadmap. Licensing of business in the KSA begins with the Ministry of Investment of Saudi Arabia (MISA). Company registration in Saudi Arabia and the commercial register are under the responsibility of the Ministry of Commerce. Financial services are overseen by SAMA (the central bank) and the CMA (Capital Market Authority), while personnel policy and Saudization are controlled by the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Development (HRSD) of the KSA.

Requirements for hiring Saudi citizens and the assessment of an employer’s compliance with Nitaqat are handled through HRSD and automated Saudization monitoring. Payroll payments are processed through the Wage Protection System (WPS); without WPS files the bank blocks payments and HRSD records the violation. In this architecture, the solution developed at COREDO is to build a single compliance calendar and compliance checkpoints for Saudization before operations launch.

Registration and licensing of a JV in KSA

A joint venture in KSA is not a single document but a sequence of coordinated steps. The COREDO team has delivered projects where we, in 8–12 weeks, carried out Due Diligence of a partner in Saudi Arabia, prepared the JV agreement, simultaneously obtained the MISA license and assembled the package for Commercial Registration. At the same time we embedded KYC/AML procedures to meet banking requirements for the joint venture to speed up account opening.

LLC / Branch / Holding: Why WLL Is Not Suitable for Saudi Arabia

Most often an LLC is chosen for a JV — a flexible limited liability form adapted to local realities. A branch is appropriate when direct control by the parent company is required and there is no local shareholder, but then Nitaqat and localization fall on the parent company. In a regional structure you can use a holding to own shares and IP, whereas in KSA it acts as the parent company over the local LLC. The WLL format, typical for a number of Gulf countries, is not the same in Saudi Arabia, where different designations are applied — an important point to consider when preparing documentation.

Company registration and licenses in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

• obtaining an investment license MISA, where the type of activity and equity participation are recorded.
• Signing the articles of association and the JV agreement, filing for Commercial Registration with the Ministry of Commerce.
• Registration with ZATCA (taxes/VAT), with the Chamber of Commerce and Industry, obtaining a municipal license.
• Connecting to WPS, setting up the HRSD portal, uploading Nitaqat data.

When to register a branch in Saudi Arabia

A branch is appropriate for companies with project contracts and a limited period of presence. Registration and licensing of a branch in KSA also proceed through MISA and the Ministry of Commerce, but corporate governance is simpler.

How to avoid losing control of shares

Equity participation: not just percentages in CR, but the architecture of control. How to agree participation shares and control mechanisms we record in two documents: shareholders agreement (SHA) and the joint venture agreement (JV agreement). There we also define corporate governance in the JV: composition and quorum of the board, the list of reserved matters, budget limits, banking mandates and KPIs for Saudization and localization.

Key provisions of the SHA and JV agreement

We recommend including: deadlock‑mechanisms, option schemes (call/put), tag‑along and drag‑along, contractual guarantees and sureties for investors, non‑compete agreements and corporate restrictions.

Fix the exit and buy-out before the start

Exit mechanisms from the JV and the buy‑out must be clear from day one: buy triggers, valuation formulas, lock‑up, ROFR/ROFO and the procedure for bringing in a third party. In KSA we often

Protection of minority shareholders and risk management

The minority protection mechanism in a joint venture is not only a veto pool. It is audit, access to information, disclosure requirements to regulators, and automatic triggers to appoint an independent director upon covenant breaches.

Saudization and localization for joint ventures

Requirements for Saudization for JVs are based on the Saudi Nitaqat program: the industry and company size set mandatory Saudization quotas and a category “color” (from red to platinum). Compliance with Saudization is overseen by HRSD through automated Saudization monitoring and WPS.

Quotas and localization without business disruption

Adapting HR policy to Nitaqat starts with a workforce plan: quotas for national staff and training programs, a transition to local management and leadership over a 12–24 month horizon, and a succession matrix for key roles. The COREDO team builds a “local talent pool + expat mentors” model, which accelerates hiring, retention and the transfer of competencies.

Assessing the impact of Saudization on a project’s margin takes into account salaries, HRDF subsidies, training costs, penalties for Saudization violations in KSA and the effect on productivity. Minimizing OPEX while complying with Saudization requirements is achieved through proper job grading, hybrid teams and outsourcing functions with verification of local content.

KPIs and reporting in public procurement

Percentage of Saudis by job category, share of nationals in management, average cost of hire/retention, training hours, time to fill vacancies, and the stability of WPS payments. monitoring systems for localization and Saudization KPIs and real-time compliance monitoring are integrated into HRIS and payroll. How to ensure quota compliance for participation in public procurement: we record it in the “Saudization compliance plan for external audit” with documentary evidence for KSA regulators and procurement platforms.

Compliance, AML/KYC and sanctions risks

Compliance and AML for joint ventures in KSA is a fundamental discipline. Checks KYC and AML in KSA cover partners, beneficial owners and key suppliers: KYC requirements for partners and beneficial owners include UBO declarations, sources of funds, tax status (CRS/FATCA), background checks and proof of address. Banking requirements for a joint venture cover constitutional/incorporation documents, JV agreement, specimen signatures, business plan and WPS connection.

Export and import permits in Saudi Arabia, especially for dual-use equipment, require a separate stream of documentation. AML/CFT reporting in the KSA banking system formalizes cash transactions, cross-border payments and the beneficial ownership structure.

Taxes and the financial model: ROI and compliance

Taxation of a joint venture in KSA combines corporate tax and zakat: the foreign shareholders’ portion is subject to corporate tax (typically 20%), the Saudi/GCC-compatible shareholders’ portion: zakat under local rules. Plus VAT 15%, and possible withholding taxes on royalties, services and interest.

The JV ROI assessment in KSA must take mandatory localization into account. When budgeting and forecasting ROI under localization we build in opex markups for Saudization, local subsidies and loans, CAPEX requirements and the timeline to reach the target Nitaqat category. The cost‑benefit assessment of production localization takes into account the near‑shore effect, logistics and access to government procurement.

Foreign exchange transaction risks and FX position management in KSA are mitigated by the SAR peg to the USD, but supplies and services from third countries create cross‑currency risks; we hedge them through forwards and currency corridors.

Financial reporting, audit and transparency for a JV are not optional but survival requirements. Disclosure requirements to regulators, regular audits and agreed dividend distribution policies in the JV reduce the risk of conflicts and increase creditworthiness.

Operational readiness: visas, HR and IP

Procedures for obtaining investor visas and work visas are tied to the Nitaqat category and WPS compliance. We predefine the pool of positions for work permits and work visas for foreigners, as well as the localization schedule. Integration of HR and payroll systems in KSA provides WPS files, leave tracking, benefits and automation of reporting to HRSD.

We implement an onboarding program, manager training and communications «localization goals = business growth». Technology transfer agreements and IP protection, registration and trademark protection in Saudi Arabia, nondisclosure agreements and protection of trade secrets: this is the framework that safeguards your value during the knowledge transfer process.

Suppliers and Cluster Scaling

The impact of Saudization on supply chains is reflected in SLAs and price, we record KPIs and local content requirements in contracts.

Government localization support programs and subsidies and local industrial clusters and economic zones provide tax incentives, infrastructure and services. Business scaling planning in Saudi Arabia relies on a pilot stage, a risk matrix and a succession plan and a personnel reserve in JV. risk management when scaling in Saudi Arabia includes credit limits, insurance and backup supplies.

COREDO JV: localization and control

Recently the COREDO team implemented a project for a European manufacturer of industrial equipment. The client targeted the B2B segment with high requirements for local content and participation in public procurement. We conducted due diligence of the partner in Saudi Arabia, including sanctions and reputational risk due diligence, and designed the ownership structure in the joint venture: 60% foreign investor, 40% resident partner, with banking and operational control through agreed reserved matters and bank mandates.

The joint venture agreement (JV agreement) and the SHA recorded exit mechanisms: option schemes, tag-along, drag-along, a deadlock procedure and ICC arbitration. We implemented a compliance framework for the international JV: KYC requirements for partners and beneficiaries, AML procedures, reporting on AML/CFT in the KSA banking system and a Saudization compliance plan for external audit. On the HR side we set KPIs for Saudization and localization, adapted HR policy to Nitaqat and established a KPI monitoring system for localization and Saudization with real-time dashboards.

Budgeting and ROI forecasting for localization took into account tax incentives and KSA tax specifics, JV financing models in Saudi Arabia, and the risks of foreign exchange operations and currency position management. As a result the client reached the target Nitaqat category within 8 months, gained access to large tenders, and preserved margin by minimizing OPEX while complying with Saudization requirements.

Checklist for joint venture preparation in Saudi Arabia

• Entry strategy: registering a subsidiary vs a joint venture in KSA; JV models – operational JV versus a holding structure.
• Regulators: engagement with regulators: SAMA, CMA, Ministry of Commerce, MISA; sectoral restrictions on foreign capital and rules for the oil and gas sector and the local partner.
• Law and control: shareholders agreement (SHA) and key provisions; how to structure equity stakes to protect investor control; minority protection mechanisms; arbitration clauses LCIA/ICC/SIAC.
• Compliance: compliance and AML for joint ventures in KSA; KYC and AML checks in KSA; KYC for partners and beneficial owners; compliance calendar and reporting to KSA regulators.
• Banks: which documents are needed to open an account and finance the JV; banking requirements for the joint venture; WPS connection.
• Saudization: assessing Nitaqat compliance for the employer; mandatory Saudization quotas; automated Saudization monitoring; preparing a Saudization compliance plan for external audit.
• HR and visas: procedures for obtaining investor and work visas; managing staffing quotas and localization; adapting HR policy to Nitaqat.
• Suppliers: assessing suppliers’ compliance with localization requirements; how to ensure compliance with quotas for participation in public procurement.
• Taxes and finance: taxation of the joint venture in KSA; tax incentives; ROI assessment for the joint venture in KSA; localization budgeting.
• Operational risks: sanctions and export risks for the JV; export and import permits in Saudi Arabia; administrative actions and penalties in KSA for violations.
• IP and agreements: intellectual property protection in the JV; registration and protection of trademarks in Saudi Arabia; non-compete agreements and corporate restrictions.
• Reputation and market: managing the JV’s reputational risks; analysis of the competitive environment and barriers to entry; impact of the national industrial policy Vision 2030 on the JV.

COREDO addresses overlooked nuances

• Profit sharing and dividend distribution in a JV require alignment with tax rules and bank covenants. We build in DSCR tests and an approval sequence for payments.
• AML/CFT reporting and financial reporting are not reduced to “tick-box exercises”. The COREDO team implements second-line control procedures and an independent internal audit.
• The impact of Saudization on margins is often greater than expected. We adapt the business model to Saudization requirements, including process redesign and moving roles to outsourcing with local content.
• Interaction with local suppliers and subcontractors affects the assessment of localization. We specify local content metrics and SLAs in contracts, as well as reporting requirements.
• Sectoral restrictions on foreign capital in sensitive industries can be removed through smart structuring and partnership with a Saudi resident, but the boundaries of what is permissible are fixed at the MISA level in advance.

Frequently asked questions: short answers

• How quickly can a JV be opened? A realistic timeframe – 8–12 weeks to CR and a bank account, assuming partners and documents are ready.
• Where to keep control? In SHA/JV agreement: reserved matters, option mechanisms and bank mandates.
• What about currency? The SAR is pegged to the USD, but multi-currency procurement chains require hedging.
• How to protect IP? Register trademarks and patents in the KSA, secure rights to improvements and export restrictions in license agreements and NDAs.
• What are the consequences of not complying with quotas?
  Legal consequences of failing to comply with localization quotas: fines, blocking of visas/transfers, downgrading of Nitaqat category, exclusion from government procurement and other administrative measures and sanctions in the KSA.

Role of the local counsel

В COREDO мы совмещаем локальную экспертизу с международным комплаенсом, что помогает увязать санкционные, экспортные и AML‑требования сразу в рамках одного комплаенс‑фреймворка для международного JV.

Клиент получает не набор разрозненных услуг, а сквозную траекторию: от выбора корпоративной формы (корпоративные формы: холдинги, филиалы, дочерние компании) и критериев выбора саудовского партнёра до планирования масштабирования и оценки возврата инвестиций при обязательной локализации. This reduces transaction costs and shortens time to revenue.

Joint venture in Saudi Arabia as a predictable asset

A joint venture in Saudi Arabia is a project at the intersection of law, tax, HR and operational design. If you take Saudization requirements for the JV into account in advance, establish Saudization compliance controls, and design corporate governance and exit mechanisms, you will get a predictable asset with a clear ROI. The solution developed at COREDO combines legal support for JVs in KSA, due diligence, licensing, KYC/AML and an HR model into a single roadmap and enables managing KPIs for Saudization and localization in real time.

I invite you to look at KSA pragmatically: assess the cost of entry, choose the format (a subsidiary or a JV), calculate the effect of Nitaqat on margin and prepare a JV agreement and SHA that will protect capital and control. The COREDO team is ready to become your long-term partner: from the first negotiations with a resident partner to reporting to regulators and scaling. This approach reduces risks, speeds up licensing and turns Vision 2030 into concrete commercial results.