AML compliance as a factor in access to payment systems

Content

In 2024 payment processors rejected more than 40% of merchant onboarding applications due to weak AML compliance, resulting in losses of billions of euros for fintechs in Europe and Asia. Imagine: your payment service is ready to launch, but a major PSP blocks transactions because of a lack of a risk‑based approach or incomplete sanctions screening — familiar pain? AML compliance determines access to Visa, Mastercard, SEPA and banking corridors, where without KYC/EDD, transaction monitoring and a documented PSP policy, PSPs and banks refuse onboarding. Read this article to the end — I will walk through a step‑by‑step checklist, technologies and a roadmap so you can pass the review in 3–6 months and scale your business without blockages.

AML compliance and connection to payment systems

Illustration for the section “AML compliance and connection to payment systems” in the article “AML compliance as a factor for admission to payment systems”
Payment systems consider AML compliance the number one barrier: without it there is no access to the ecosystem. The COREDO team has repeatedly observed how clients from the EU and Singapore accelerated onboarding by implementing FATF standards in advance.

Requirements for Visa, Mastercard, SEPA, and PSP

Visa and Mastercard require KYC/CDD for merchant onboarding with verification of UBO and source of funds, plus daily transaction monitoring for the typologies of layering and structuring. SEPA focuses on real-time AML for instant payments, where PSPs perform EDD for high-risk merchant profiles, including chargeback risks.

COREDO’s experience confirms: without these elements rejection is inevitable, as in the case of a European aggregator blocked for weak screening.

Role of FATF, EU AMLD and local laws

FATF recommendations dictate the Travel Rule for payments and transfers, mandatory for PSPs in the EU and Asia, with AML systems required to be compatible with PSD2 and the EU AMLD. Local laws in Singapore (MAS) and Estonia strengthen PEP screening and watchlist checks. A solution developed by COREDO for a Cypriot PSP harmonized policy with these standards, securing access to several networks.

Trends 2024–2025: real-time screening and the Travel Rule

In 2025 the Travel Rule expands to transfers over 1000 EUR, with real-time sanctions screening and a focus on VASP AML requirements for crypto payments. EU regulators require blockchain analytics for VA risks. Our experience at COREDO has shown: early implementation of streaming analytics reduces the risk of blocking by 70%.

Elements of an AML program for obtaining approval

Illustration for the section «Elements of an AML program for obtaining approval» in the article «AML compliance as a factor for access to payment systems»
PSPs expect a full AML program with evidence. Here is a basic checklist tested by the COREDO team on clients from the Czech Republic and Dubai.

AML policy and governance in the company

An approved AML policy and internal controls are required with the appointment of a CAMLO, reporting to senior management and audit trails for explainability.

Document AML governance; it’s a must-have for audits.

Customer verification and onboarding: KYC, CDD, EDD

KYC for payment providers includes CDD with OCR/biometrics, EDD for PEPs and high-risk, plus an annual refresh.
Checklist: UBO passport, business profile, source of funds.

Transaction monitoring and KYT: rules, red flags

Transaction monitoring identifies red flags such as trade-based laundering through a risk-based approach and EDD triggers (for example, >10% chargebacks).

Escalation to case management, with a 24-hour SLA.

Sanctions screening: dynamic OFAC/EU/UN lists

Sanctions screening for merchants against OFAC/UN/EU with dynamic list updates and PEP checks. Respond to matches with real-time blocking.

Reporting and interaction with the FIU: SAR/STR, regulatory reporting

SAR/STR filing within 24–72 hours with regulatory reporting and evidence retention for the FIU. Readiness for e-discovery is key to an audit.

AML architecture for payment systems

Illustration for the section «AML architecture for payment systems» in the article «AML compliance as a factor for admission to payment systems»
An effective architecture combines RegTech with APIs. COREDO integrated such stacks for Singaporean PSPs.

MVP AML stack for rapid onboarding

API integration for real-time screening with KYC document verification technologies (OCR, biometrics) and cloud-native AML platforms. Time to launch: 4 weeks.

Advanced architecture for streaming analytics, XAI and blockchain

Real-time screening engines with explainable AI in AML, behavioural analytics and blockchain analytics for compliance for VA. Dynamic profiling reduces false positives by 50%.

Integration of PSPs and banks for instant payments

SLA: <100ms latency for real-time AML for instant payments. API-first providers ensure compatibility.

Scalability and KPIs: alert volume per FTE, MTTR, SAR

Scalability of AML systems via microservices. Optimize false positives according to KPIs: MTTR <2 days, alerts per FTE <500, SAR conversion 5%.

How to organize KYC/EDD and monitoring

Illustration for the section 'How to organize KYC/EDD and monitoring' in the article 'AML compliance as a factor of access to payment systems'
Organize processes to match the AML onboarding checklist for merchants. COREDO practice: automation speeds things up by 60%.

Merchant onboarding: step-by-step checklist

  1. Document collection (passports, articles of association).
  2. UBO/PEP screening.
  3. Source of funds.
  4. Risk scoring.
  5. EDD if high-risk.

SLA: 48 hours.

TPRM and third-party management

Third-party onboarding risk via vendor Due Diligence and AML outsourcing. CaaS maintains control.

Working with high-risk clients: EDD, SLA, documentation

EDD for high-risk clients: triggers – объем >1M EUR, non-resident. Workflow: escalation → decision → audit.

Policy and playbook for payment sanctions

Sanctions response playbook: match → freeze → SAR → report. Lists updated hourly.

Legal risks of non-compliance: what to watch out for

Illustration for the section «Legal risks of non-compliance: what to watch out for» in the article «AML compliance as a factor for admission to payment systems»
Non-compliance hits revenues. COREDO minimized such risks for Asian clients.

Connection refusals and blocks

Without AML acceptance criteria, access to payment gateways is denied.
Cost of compliance vs onboarding revenue: compliance pays off in 6 months.

Fines and reputational risks

Fines up to 10% of turnover under the EU AMLD. Regulatory risks for international payments include reputational losses.

GDPR PDPA Schrems II: KYC restrictions

Data privacy & cross-border data transfer under GDPR/Schrems II. Localize data for Asia.

ROI and economic model: how much it costs and how to calculate the benefit

ROI calculation: CAPEX 50–200k EUR is recouped by a 30% increase in the approval rate.

CAPEX and OPEX models for AML: software, personnel

In-house: 150k CAPEX + 50k OPEX/year. CaaS: 80k + 20k.

Assessment of benefits: approval rate, blocks, risk of fines

ROI = (additional revenue – compliance cost) / cost. Example: +20% of transactions = 500k EUR/year.

In-house vs CaaS vs hybrid: table

Model Time-to-market CAPEX (k EUR) OPEX/year (k EUR) Risk control Scalability
In-house 6 months 200 60 High Medium
CaaS 2 months 50 30 Medium High
Hybrid 3 months 100 40 High High

Implementation roadmap: MVP → scaling → audit-ready

Roadmap from COREDO: from MVP to full compliance in 12–18 months.

-3 months: eKYC, sanctions API, merchants

Documents + MVP AML stack. Test on 100 merchants.

Deployment of transaction monitoring and EDD in 9 months

Transaction monitoring + workflow automation. Sign SLAs.

18 months: explainability, advanced analytics, blockchain, audit

Explainable AI + blockchain analytics. Audit readiness.

Common objections and answers for owners

What AML requirements are there for connecting to Visa/Mastercard/SEPA? KYC/UBO, TM, sanctions screening per FATF.
Can AML outsourcing (CaaS) be used to speed up connection to payment gateways and retain control? Yes, with TPRM and audit rights: speeds it up 2x.
How to implement real-time sanctions screening for instant-payments without lags? API with <50ms latency and streaming.

Case studies and practical examples

A European PSP obtained approval within three months.

The European PSP implemented API integration and biometrics: approval rate rose by 40%.

Fintech with a crypto product: integration of blockchain analytics and MiCA/VASP

Singapore fintech integrated blockchain analytics, passing a MAS audit.

Downloadable templates

  • AML onboarding checklist for merchants (Excel template).
  • EDD triggers matrix.
  • Sanctions response playbook.
  • KPI/ROI model (Excel-ready with CAPEX/OPEX).

Key takeaways and action checklist

  1. Develop an AML compliance policy.
  2. Appoint a CAMLO.
  3. Implement eKYC + CDD.
  4. Set up sanctions screening.
  5. Launch transaction monitoring.
  6. Define EDD triggers.
  7. SOP for SAR/STR.
  8. Integrate API for SLA.
  9. Test on an MVP.
  10. Prepare audit trails.

How to choose suppliers and partners

Recommendations for selecting suppliers and partners are especially important when the stability of key business processes and compliance with regulatory requirements depend on an external vendor. Below are practical criteria for evaluating suppliers and partners that will help compare proposals according to uniform parameters and choose solutions with an optimal API-first approach, transparency, and reliable support.

LEAVE AN APPLICATION AND GET
A CONSULTATION

    By contacting us you agree to your details being used for the purposes of processing your application in accordance with our Privacy policy.