When MiCA is not suitable pay attention to Switzerland

Content

In 2025, more than 60% of cryptocurrency startups planning to enter the European market faced the need to completely overhaul their business models due to MiCA regulation and tightened AML compliance. While institutional investors are increasing requirements for transparency and legal harmonization, many international companies note: EU new rules not only raise costs but also create market entry barriers for innovative projects, especially in the stablecoin and asset tokenization segment.

Why do even experienced entrepreneurs, who have successfully registered companies in the EU, find themselves at a dead end when attempting to obtain a cryptocurrency license or comply with 5AMLD and FATF standards? How to choose a strategy if MiCA doesn’t suit your business, and the risks of legal uncertainty and compliance become critical?
In this article, I will detail when MiCA is truly disadvantageous or impossible for crypto businesses, and why Switzerland is one of the few alternatives that allow not only legal scaling but also maintaining flexibility, innovation, and tax clarity. Based on COREDO’s practice and the latest data from international regulators, you will receive a step-by-step guide on how to choose and implement a market entry strategy for the EU and Asia without losing time and competitive advantages. I recommend reading the article to the end – here you will find unobvious solutions that already work in practice.

When MiCA Doesn’t Suit Crypto Businesses

Illustration for the section "When MiCA Doesn
MiCA regulation is intended to unify approaches to the regulation of crypto assets in the EU, but in practice, not all business models and scaling strategies fit within its framework. COREDO experts have repeatedly encountered situations where the adoption of MiCA created additional barriers for international companies, especially regarding AML compliance and cross-border licensing.

Limitations of MiCA for International Companies

MiCA introduces strict requirements for the classification of crypto assets, corporate governance, and asset custody. For companies working with innovative business models, such as asset tokenization or stablecoins, these requirements become not only financially burdensome but also hinder the rapid launch of projects. Crypto asset management protocols must comply with unified EU standards, which limits flexibility and requires significant investment in legal harmonization and integration of AML/KYC processes.

In COREDO’s practice, there have been cases where even after successful company registration in the EU and preliminary regulatory approval, product launches were delayed for months due to the need for additional validations of KYC procedures and corporate governance. For institutional investors, this means increased operational risks and reduced attractiveness of the European jurisdiction for innovative projects.

When MiCA is Disadvantageous for Crypto Businesses

MiCA is not suitable for companies focused on rapid scaling, working in multiple markets, or providing flexible crypto services (e.g., custodial services, DeFi products, multi-asset platforms). Compliance for cryptocurrency companies in Asia and other regions is often based on different principles, and integrating these processes within the MiCA framework requires significant time and resources.

Moreover, MiCA does not always consider the specifics of risk management in cross-border operations and imposes increased requirements on corporate governance and transparency, which can be critical for startups and companies operating in rapidly changing market segments. In such cases, alternatives to MiCA for crypto businesses become not just desirable but necessary to maintain competitiveness.

Cryptocurrency Regulation in Switzerland

Illustration for the section "Cryptocurrency Regulation in Switzerland" in the article "When MiCA Doesn
Switzerland has long established itself as a jurisdiction with high transparency of crypto asset regulations and a flexible approach to innovation. A solution developed by COREDO for one of the clients showed that registering a crypto business in Switzerland allows not only obtaining a VASP license in the shortest possible time but also ensuring the legalization of cryptocurrency operations in accordance with FATF and AMLA requirements.

Thus, opening a crypto business in Switzerland requires careful adherence to regulatory procedures and standards set by FINMA; let’s review the key VASP requirements for 2025.

FINMA Requirements for VASP in 2025

FINMA (Swiss regulator) establishes clear yet flexible rules for VASP (Virtual Asset Service Provider). By 2025, requirements for corporate governance, custody, and asset reservation, as well as AML/KYC process integration, have become even more structured, while maintaining adaptability for innovative models. To obtain a crypto license in Switzerland, you need to:

  • Confirm transparency of the corporate structure and sources of funding.
  • Implement KYC and AML procedures in accordance with AMLA and FATF standards.
  • Ensure custody and reservation of assets comparable to the banking sector.
  • Demonstrate sustainable risk management and internal protocols for crypto asset management.
COREDO practice confirms: for companies oriented towards institutional investors, compliance with FINMA requirements becomes a significant competitive advantage.
These standards serve as a foundation for the sustainable development of the crypto industry and seamlessly transfer into AML and KYC requirements that every market player must comply with.

AML and KYC for Crypto Business in Switzerland

AML compliance in Switzerland is based on principles of transparency and preventive control. Key requirements include:

  • Multi-level client identification (KYC), including for complex corporate structures and transactions involving stablecoins.
  • Use of transaction analysis technologies and suspicious operation monitoring.
  • Integration of AML/KYC processes into the company’s business processes considering FATF and 5AMLD requirements.
The COREDO team implemented projects where the integration of KYC procedures not only reduced compliance risks for clients but also increased trust from international partners and investors. Special attention is paid to privacy and data protection issues, which is especially important for companies working with institutional and private clients from Asia and the EU.

Cryptocurrency Taxes in Russia

One of Switzerland’s key advantages is its high tax clarity for crypto assets. Unlike most EU countries, where tax regimes for crypto businesses vary and often change, Switzerland has a transparent taxation system:

  • Crypto assets are recognized as property and are taxed on capital, not income.
  • Companies involved in asset tokenization and stablecoins are eligible for tax benefits and special regimes.
  • Tax burden optimization is possible for cross-border operations, as confirmed by COREDO’s experience in supporting clients from the EU and Asia.
Such transparency allows accurately assessing ROI for crypto companies and minimizing tax dispute risks.

MiCA or Swiss Crypto Regulation: Comparison

Criteria MiCA (EU) Switzerland (FINMA)
Legal Harmonization Yes (unified rules for the EU) No (national approach)
AML/KYC Requirements Strict, standardized Strict, but flexible
Tax Clarity Depends on the EU country High, transparent
Innovation Possibility Pilot regimes, but more restrictions Flexibility, support for innovations
Licensing Costs and Timing Higher, longer Lower, faster
Cross-Border Licensing Yes (within the EU) No, but easy export of services
Judicial Practice Being formed Rich experience
Comparing MiCA and FINMA regulation, I note: for companies, prioritizing flexibility, innovation, and tax clarity, Swiss jurisdiction often proves more preferable. This is especially relevant for startups working with new business models where pilot regimes and support for innovations play a key role.

Crypto License in Switzerland for the EU

Illustration for the section "Crypto License in Switzerland for the EU" in the article "When MiCA Doesn
The decision to register a cryptocurrency business in Switzerland requires a strategic approach and a deep understanding of regulatory requirements. COREDO’s experience shows: a clear roadmap and professional legal support minimize risks and accelerate market entry into the EU and Asia.

Therefore, successful company registration and obtaining a license in Switzerland requires a phased approach and careful preparation for each stage, which forms the basis for further consideration of the structural and legal nuances of the process.

Registration and Licensing of a Crypto Business in Switzerland

  1. Choosing an Organizational-Legal Form: Preference is usually given to AG or GmbH, providing flexibility in corporate governance.
  2. Preparation of Founding Documents and Business Plan: It is important to detail the management structure, funding sources, and asset storage mechanisms.
  3. Submitting an Application to FINMA: Includes disclosure of beneficial owners, description of AML/KYC processes, and internal control.
  4. Implementing Compliance Procedures: At this stage, COREDO develops individual AML/KYC policies, integrating transaction analysis and monitoring technologies.
  5. Obtaining a VASP License and Company Registration: Once FINMA approves, the company can officially provide crypto services and scale the business to the EU and Asian markets.

AML/KYC and Compliance with FATF Requirements

For successful licensing, it is critical to ensure compliance not only with Swiss but also with international FATF and 5AMLD standards. COREDO practice showed: integrating AML/KYC processes into business processes not only meets regulator requirements but also increases the company’s investment appeal.

Key Elements:

  • Use of automated transaction monitoring systems.
  • Regular employee training and internal process audits.
  • Implementing risk management and reporting protocols for institutional investors.

ROI and Risks of Swiss Jurisdiction

The ROI assessment for crypto companies in Switzerland is based on balancing licensing costs, tax burden, and scaling opportunities. A solution developed by COREDO for a client reduced costs by 30% compared to a similar project in the EU and enabled entry into new markets due to the ease of cross-border operations.

On the other hand, it is important to consider strategic risks:
– Lack of automatic cross-border licensing within the EU.
– Need for constant monitoring of regulatory changes.
– Potential barriers when entering the EU market related to legal harmonization.

Where to Scale a Crypto Business: Switzerland, EU, or Asia?

Illustration for the section "Where to Scale a Crypto Business: Switzerland, EU, or Asia?" in the article "When MiCA Doesn
the choice of jurisdiction for scaling a crypto business depends on strategic goals, client structure, and product features. COREDO’s experience covers company registration in the EU, Asia, and Switzerland, allowing an objective evaluation of each model’s advantages.

– Switzerland, optimal for innovative startups focused on institutional investors and international markets, where regulatory flexibility and tax clarity are critical.
– EU, suitable for companies targeting the mass market and cross-border licensing within a single legal field, provided they are ready for high compliance costs.
– Asia is attractive for projects working with high-tech products and multi-jurisdictional clients but requires special attention to compliance and local AML/KYC requirements.

The EU market entry strategies developed by COREDO include a comprehensive evaluation of legal, tax, and operational risks, as well as AML/KYC process integration for multi-jurisdictional businesses.

Recommendations for Entrepreneurs

Illustration for the section "Recommendations for Entrepreneurs" in the article "When MiCA Doesn

  • The MiCA regulation is a powerful tool for legal harmonization but not a universal solution for all business models.
  • Switzerland offers a unique combination of flexibility, transparency, and tax clarity for crypto businesses, especially in innovative services and asset tokenization segments.
  • The key to successfully entering the EU and Asian markets: professional legal support, AML/KYC process integration, and constant monitoring of regulatory changes.
  • COREDO practice confirms: an individualized approach to jurisdiction selection and compliance architecture building allows not only to minimize risks but also significantly increase the company’s investment appeal.
  • For long-term success, building corporate governance oriented towards institutional investor and international regulator requirements is critical.

MiCA and Switzerland: Answering Questions

In which cases is MiCA disadvantageous for a crypto business?
MiCA is not suitable for companies focused on rapid scaling, flexible business models, and innovative products, where integrating AML/KYC and corporate governance requires individualized solutions.
What advantages does registering a company in Switzerland provide for a crypto startup?
High tax clarity, regulatory flexibility, support for innovative models, and a developed crypto infrastructure in Switzerland allow for rapid business launch and scaling while maintaining compliance with international standards.
What are the risks in choosing Switzerland instead of MiCA?
The main risks are related to the absence of automatic cross-border licensing in the EU and the necessity of constant monitoring of changes in European regulation.
How to ensure compliance with FATF and 5AMLD when registering a company in Switzerland?
Implement multi-level AML/KYC processes, use transaction analysis technologies, and conduct regular internal audits, which COREDO practices have proven effective for international crypto companies.
What are the real costs and timelines for obtaining a VASP license in Switzerland?
On average, the process takes from 3 to 6 months, with costs 20-30% lower than licensing in the EU. The final cost depends on the business structure and chosen risk management model.
What are the alternative jurisdictions for crypto businesses?
Besides the EU and Switzerland, Singapore, Estonia, Cyprus, and the UK are in demand – each with its own regulatory features, taxation, and compliance specifics.
How to integrate AML/KYC processes for a multi-jurisdictional crypto business?
It is recommended to use automated solutions adapted to different regulatory requirements and to build a compliance architecture considering the specifics of each jurisdiction.
What are the long-term consequences of choosing Swiss jurisdiction for investors and businesses?
Regulatory stability, a developed legal framework for crypto-assets, and support for innovations make Switzerland attractive for long-term investments and scaling of crypto businesses.
If you face a choice between MiCA and Swiss regulation: COREDO’s team is ready to offer a strategy based on real cases and a deep understanding of international standards.
LEAVE AN APPLICATION AND GET
A CONSULTATION

    By contacting us you agree to your details being used for the purposes of processing your application in accordance with our Privacy policy.