- Opening bank accounts
- AML consulting
- Business support
- Сompanies for sale
Cryptocurrency has survived for the longest time without being controlled by the authorities, but now there are proposed laws and regulations about it. Hence, the meaning of this for the crypto industry is currently unclear.
Back when crypto was just starting, it was considered the “wild west” of the financial industry – some kind of lawless system inhabited by suspicious individuals where each person was forced to take care of himself or herself.
Changes can be seen from how it was ten years ago. With all the complex instances where both cryptocurrency and blockchain were dragged into, the promise that a significant regulatory plan for the industry now has a greater chance of possibility.
As authorities start to introduce new laws and regulations to crypto institutions, it is not surprising that people are thinking about how these would affect the crypto environment. Will there be stricter management that will positively make a change in the industry or will it be a strength to hinder the development of crypto’s infinite improvement?
James Burnie is a financial services regulation and Financial Technology Partner, advising financial institutions on Europe and the United Kingdom financial regulation at a law firm, gunnercooke. They stand for large-scale cryptocurrency and blockchain products and services that are believed to be affected by all laws and regulations that will be implemented in the industry.
However, James does not agree that newly introduced rulings will cause trouble. Instead, he said that a certain level of laws and regulations is necessary.In an interview, topics on the future of the cryptocurrency environment and the regulations that come with it were discussed.
James remarked that he is attracted to breaking new ground since regulation is amusing, especially when one is viewing it as something where development may root from.
The start was when he worked on the very first and fruitful establishment of cryptocurrency assets (also known as the initial coin offering) from the United Kingdom. For the reason of its success and just several lawyers in the said country were into the industry as it started, his involvement expanded.
In the course of time, instead of treating cryptocurrency as just a hobby, it became his primary job.
A company whose focus is on corporate and commercial disciplines, Gunnercooke has approximately five hundred employees around Europe and has an income of GBP 50 million.
They have the United Kingdom’s widest crypto and financial technology service having more than one hundred customers, and a large market in Germany directed by Wolfgang Richter.
Lately, they just launched a practice conducted by Kathryn Dodds which introduced blockchain and creative industries for music, media, and arts.
Further, they work with transactions involving the blockchain industry, which includes designers and developers, cryptocurrency custodial solutions, blockchain applications, crypto trading, trading through distributed ledger technology (DLT), virtual asset brokers and funds, and financial technology organizations.
Worldwide, the initial mark where regulations started was from these two primary regulatory regimes:
Nevertheless, this is eventually turning into a more complicated arrangement. Several examples can be seen below:
Hence, one can observe a fascinating exchange among regulators whose objectives are just a single thing, which is to make the right decision regarding cryptocurrency management, but in contrast, have different perspectives on what that implies in reality.
It is noteworthy that investing is only one of the usages of cryptocurrency assets. Several activities do not include this, and hence, it is not substantial for these activities that virtual assets used for investing are inconsistent.
However, when one looks at these assets like an investment, volatility may not be the issue and it will all depend on what one is obtaining. The principal issue would be the degree of risks and returns.
All of us know that low-risk assets are expected to have a lower return, and high-risk assets tend to give a higher return.
Taking this into consideration, cryptocurrency belongs to high-risk ones. If crypto enthusiasts know this wisdom, they would handle their assets responsibly and that there is no need to be anxious. For instance, it is significant to hold your assets just right, not overly exposed.
Therefore, it was suggested by the Financial Conduct Authority FCA that virtual asset traders should be limited by the law to not exceed ten percent of their overall asset value.
In contrast, one should be more careful of the low-return / high-risk investments because in these transactions investors mistakenly take them as lower risk than they already are.
As a definition, regulation means that there is a rule maintained by authorities for a certain project or activity. It just plainly suggests that these regulators want to do the “right thing”.
In particular, European authorities are prioritizing the rights of each person, as such, they focus on ways to protect their consumers and legislation like EU General Data Protection Regulation. Another is in the United States of America wherein they concentrate on corporation rights thinking that the corporate world is the foundation of their economic system. China, on the other hand, goes with their state, as they consider it as the one who can provide the best decisions for the people of their country.
Thinking about development, people should not think about the laws and regulations as blockers to the industry’s growth. Instead, the concern is how they could turn these regulations as just an objective to how they will be obtained, specifically, the “right thing”.
What’s more mind-boggling is the question of how these could be fulfilled given that there are numerous ways and methods by different parties involved.
At the present time, we can see various authorities discuss the backbreaking demand for crypto’s technological development, and are putting an attempt to balance risk and opportunities in an industry wherein progress is still ongoing.
In the United Kingdom, they have the FCA’s CryptoSprint as a welcoming provision. They just hosted their very first CryptoSprint events in May and June 2022. The objective of the events was to seek industry views on the current market and the design of an appropriate regulatory regime. This is showing that the country’s board of regulations is engaged with the developing pace of the cryptocurrency, especially when it comes to its laws.
Is it needed? Yes, but to some degree. Why? Because regulations take off the nasty stuff in the industry. It just needs to be on the correct side and recognizes the broadness of the environment.
It can be illustrated by taking a game company as a case. In this illustration, the company rewards the winners of the game with some cryptocurrency tokens and these tokens unlock another level of the game, which in turn grants a different account that offers token-lending services seeking a profit for the investors. Looking into this, any law or regulation concerning virtual assets is required to have sensitivity in the market, should be adaptable, and be open to any change.
Most cryptocurrency enthusiasts yearn for a standard line of attack when it comes to laws and regulations wherein the main point is to have the sole correct answer to regulatory questions. This will make the legal cost of operation to be reduced, but it is more than just a dream than a reality.
As James commented, his expectation of the regulation runs by having various strategies, though it may seem complex, these variations may provide more positive impacts on the industry than just confusion.
Specifically, every unique enterprise paradigm is anticipated to be drawn to the regulatory regimes that are most suited for that specific business. However, this does not imply that they are competing to be seen as cheaper than other companies because an operation led by a good administration provides consolation to the consumers and co-contractors concerning the stability of the said companies. Hence, the strategy will come up as something to serve their clients a “premium”.
People are now torn between traditional financial methods and the virtual asset world. Just like how it was during the iPad versus computer period, most businesses that are using blockchain on their model, have several things in common with the conventional methods. This brings about the criticism on why someone would change a process that is currently working. However, “working” in this sense only denotes that users have been putting up with it since there is no available substitute, not that it is working well and efficiently.
Supporting this was Burnie’s client some years past. This person never confessed that he only utilized blockchain technology because of the fact that other people considered it unappealing. With this, he just charged one-tenth of the competitors’ rate, while making it more profitable through blockchain.
Another actual example of the advantages of blockchain is transaction reporting. This is by submitting data, which contains information relating to a transaction. These reports are used to detect and investigate suspected market abuse. With respect to the law, trading securities are required to have these kinds of reports.
Having crypto assets being utilized as securities, automation on reporting procedures can be done, cutting down the operational cost. For the upcoming half-decade, it is expected that blockchain technology will spread to all sectors of businesses, and people will not make it something to be anxious about, but instead, a noticeable tool.
Burnie agreed that it is kind of a “practice what you preach” case because it is hard to accept the concept of cryptocurrency if you do not fully take it into your system. Aside from this, it is also important to perceive where it will eventually head.
Fast-paced industries are going ahead with the developing cryptocurrency curve. This is because crypto is now accepted as payment in several businesses, and major organizations like Microsoft Corporation and financial technology corporation, PayPal. Specifically, they are ready to receive bitcoins (BTCs).
Numerous big economical systems are researching how they could integrate cryptocurrency as a payment method along with the conventional currency. While the inconsistency of the present market fascinates public attention, it is still heading into the mainstream and is highly probable that it will become more extensively accepted in the upcoming generation.
Generally, the concept is also more about following the pace of industrial innovations. However, this is contradictory to the traditional viewpoint that each and every lawyer is not into modernization, since gunnercooke has one of the popular cryptocurrency and financial technology services in the United Kingdom. With this, it is reasonable for the institution to accept crypto as payment.
An increase in the need for both customers and future investors in this industry to make payments via crypto is observed, therefore, it is essential from a customer and business view to have both the traditional currency and cryptocurrency as options.
Several enthusiasts of virtual financial markets expressed their disapproval of the move of Celsius, but some agreed to say that it could be for the protection of their users; ETH plunged to 17%.
Crypto Prices :
|ETH||−16.4%||Smart Contract Platform|
Venture capitalists had options to compare with in detailing BTC’s plummeting price.
Since December 2020, it sank to its lowest price.
The top cryptocurrency in terms of market capitalization plunged to about one-third of its highest value of approximately USD 70, 000 in the past eight months, and less than one-half of how much it was during the first part of 2022.
In twenty – four hours, it dropped to 16 percent, an uncommon scenario of having a double-digit decrease in the crypto’s value. On the other hand, it was down by about 30 percent from May, having a value of about USD 30, 000 due to the crumbled value of another token, terraUSD (UST).
It was indeed a terrible day for bitcoin, and so did for other cryptocurrencies. Computing their aggregated market capitalization, it did not reach USD 1 trillion. This was a first since 2021, despite having inflation fears and bad news from different protocols, such as crypto lending platform Celsius’ advisory that they would be pausing withdrawals due to the “extreme market conditions”.
Ether (ETH), the second only to BTC by market capitalization, has almost the equivalent decrease in value, around negative 17%. It was during the same time span as BTC’s and its lowest since 2021.
On the other hand, CRO was higher than 20 percent at an instance even with the update that cryptocurrency trading would cut off the 5 percent of its employees, almost two hundred sixty jobs. Tron (TRX) and Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) were also down during the same period.
With all the plunge, market analysts voiced out their views, and some even offered instantaneous consolations:
Cryptocurrency’s current adversity tracked the blow of major world stock market indexes, having tech stocks being the most affected. The S&P 500 tumbled down to 3.8 percent, rejoining the bear market – hence, it was at negative 20 percent from its previous value.
Nasdaq, an American stock exchange company, entered the bear market several weeks ago as it plummeted by 4.6 percent. On the other hand, Dow Jones Industrial Average was down by 2.7 percent.
Unexpectedly, the long-established asset – gold, also fell by almost three percent.
Now, investors surely looked out for the United States Federal Reserve’s 2-day meeting, which began last Tuesday and was extensively expected to lead up to a fifty-basis point interest rate increase because of the high inflation. The most updated United States Consumer Price Index report stated that there has been a rise of 8.6 percent, the highest in the last four decades.
Connor of 3iQ positively pointed out that cryptocurrency today is still in the range of its growth band, and corresponds to how it was for the past thirteen-plus years. Further, given the mandate of United States President Joe regarding cryptocurrency regulatory executive order, he emphasized that we are still within the band of volatility for the past 5 years.
However, we can still see that crypto is now in a terrible state, having an uncertain future in the industry.
BlockFi Trading, a platform where you can buy, sell, and trade various cryptocurrency assets, announced that it would reduce its workforce by twenty percent. Rain Financial also laid-off employees, just after Crypto.com and BlockFi’s workforce cut off.
Just this month, Binance, the largest and most known crypto trading platform, paused their clients’ withdrawals for a short time.
Blake from Uphold wrote that virtual assets will now be put to a test if a bigger increase in price will occur. He also said that at this time, extreme market conditions and federal laws are worsening the negative state of cryptocurrency.
Celsius, a well-known cryptocurrency lending platform, recently announced the pause of their customers’ withdrawals and trading of crypto products as a consequence of the current “extreme market conditions” in the midst of the economic downtrend.
Crypto tokens like bitcoin lost as much as twelve percent of the total market cap as stockbrokers reacted distressfully to the most recent United States Consumer Price Index review indicating that inflation is continuing to rise since May.
Following the mentioned lending platform’s proclamation was an order in April where Celsius announced that investors who are non – accredited are prohibited from transferring their assets.
The company’s crypto products are sought-after among crypto enthusiasts, and they provide earnings on deposits of approximately seventeen percent. This is larger compared to those offered by most financial institutions such as banks.
Throughout the time when digital asset investors are overwhelmed by the bad news, there were various opinions from different market analysts and observers. Several condemned the firm’s decision; however, others think that it was a move to protect their consumers’ funds.
According to the co-founder of Apostro – a “risk management platform that prevents economical smart contract exploits by enforcing safe economical restrictions” – Kate Kurbanova, even if Celsius’ move is not uncommon, it will unquestionably affect the firm’s clients and the company’s goal to utilize centralized financial platform because such occurrence in the centralized financial institution has been happening.
Kate, then, explained that the decision was put through during the 2020’s Black Thursday since cryptocurrencies’ prices dropped drastically at that time and made an avalanche of withdrawals on lending institutions, and their customers lost their investments.
Additionally, Kurbanova emphasized that the clients are choosing whatever risks they think of as reasonable and bearable. These include liquidations that involve risks, and strategies on decentralized applications but with the feature of allowing the users to withdraw their investments at one’s convenience.
Customers even consider utilizing centralized platforms wherein it is more certain when it comes to security, but with a downside of their money being frozen for a definite length of time.
Other industry observers found a similarity regarding the collapse of terraUSD (UST) token during the middle of May, where it drove the prices of other relative cryptocurrencies like LUNA to plummet by around one hundred percent. It also lead the Decentralized Finance’s (DeFi’s) market value to dive by USD 28B.
As per the explanation of the Vice President of WeWay (a blockchain and encryption communication technology company) and Ukrainian entrepreneur, Vadym Synegin, cryptocurrency enthusiasts easily get disturbed every single time negative news or phenomenon about the industry is mentioned.
The businessman furtherly explained that the current cryptocurrency industry responds to the panic scenarios incompetently.
Several crypto analysts suggested that Celsius had options for more competent strategies, in order to offer profit to their customers.
Austin Kimm, the Co-founder and Managing Director of Strategy of Choise.com expressed that looking for liquid assets that can yield a return of USD 1 billion is more feasible than looking for other liquid assets that can make a USD 30 B profit. As per Kimm, the sole answer to the problem is by switching off deposits or moving them into a less liquid form like real estate, or cryptocurrency mining instruments.
At the same time, the Chief Executive Officer of Iconium, a private investment company that invests in digital assets and projects that will lead the decentralized Internet era, Fabio Pezzotti, asserted that Celsius’ decision to pause withdrawals was a proactive move to support the company’s liquidity on staked ether (stETH) token to be stabilized.
Fabio added that there have been rumors regarding Celsius being busted because of Ethereum’s derivative, stETH. According to Pezzotti, Celsius was just forced to pause withdrawals in order to prevent an entire bankruptcy.
For more cryptocurrency news, visit coredo.eu. We also have experts that could help you start with your crypto journey.
Fintech unicorn was once an unfamiliar term in the industry with rare sightings around the world. Ten years had passed, this once-atypical concept had developed immensely, becoming more common with almost 200 fintech unicorns across the globe. These new cohorts of unicorns are changing fintech as we know it, competing with traditional banks, equipped with modern and unconventional economic models.
The term “unicorn” per se is nothing but a magical creature, which even in myths and legends are rare to find. The word itself does not ring much of significance in the financial industry. Or so we thought.
In today’s modern financial market, a unicorn isn’t just some mythical creature that we hear from folklores. For investors and business owners, Fintech Unicorns specifically are defined as late-stage startup companies with valued funding of 1 billion USD.
The term Unicorn was first used in fintech in 2013 by Aileen Lee, a U.S. venture capital angel investor and co-founder of Cowboy Ventures, in a TechCrunch article she wrote, entitled “Welcome To The Unicorn Club: Learning from Billion-Dollar Startups.”
At the time the above mentioned article was published, unicorns are rare sightings with relatively small numbers across the globe. However, there were a number of companies who had developed as “super unicorns” as called by Lee, such as Amazon and Google.
Aileen Lee acknowledged in the same article the fact that the term ‘Unicorn’ is not the perfect word to call these companies given that these are actual companies, and unicorns obviously do not exist. “But we like the term because to us, it means something extremely rare, and magical,” Lee explained.
Unsurprisingly, Fintech Unicorns which had made the list from CB insights reaching the $1 billion-mark are mostly coming from 4 countries – the United States of America, Republic of China, United Kingdom, and India.
Even though the rest of the world has shown undeniable innovations in Fintech, many countries are still having a hard time catching up in developing proper strategies to build billion-dollar businesses.
According to Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited, for a nation to successfully nurture businesses that will reached the level of Fintech Unicorns, there are usually four main factors that should be considered:
Upon creating the term unicorn in her article, Aileen Lee also coined the Unicorn Club which refers to unicorns in general. At that time, the Fintech industry immediately took a grip of the concept.
A number of companies have been called Fintech Unicorns, becoming “members” of the “club”. No need for membership cards or registrations but gives a badge of accomplishment and boost of confidence for businesses.
In today’s market, the population of companies who have reached the “Unicorn-level” in general and in Fintech specifically, have grown immensely, going beyond being called “rare”. As of writing, there are over 1,000 companies who have been listed as Unicorns by CB Insights, divided into different classifications.
In this recent unicorn listing released by CB Insights, Fintech Unicorns took on the spot with the most number of companies listed, with over two-hundred (200) firms included.
Most of the Fintech firms who had reached this milestone were known to have been large contributors when it comes to financial and e-commerce services such as:
– Acorns – a financial technology and financial services company based in the United States of America known for micro and robo-investments.
– Betterment – an American financial advisory company which delivers online investments and cash management services
– Rapyd Financial Network – a FinTech Company founded in 2016, which operates globally via regulated regional group companies and several additional local entities
– Razorpay – a company that specializes in payments solution in India that allows businesses to accept, process and disburse payments with its product suite
– Chime – a Fintech company which provides charge-free online mobile banking services
– Cgtz – a leading Internet finance integrated service platform in China specializing in business-to-customer (B2C) debt investment portal, providing various investments products for the individual and small and medium enterprises
– Better Holdco, Inc. – an American company that manages a digital platform for mortgage and related services
A few companies who have been playing in the fields of Fintech, Buy Now, Pay Later, and Cryptocurrency industries had also made the cut including:
– Blockchain.com – a cryptocurrency financial services company which began as the first Bitcoin blockchain explorer in 2011 and later created a cryptocurrency wallet that accounted for 28% of bitcoin transactions between 2012 and 2020
– Klarna Bank AB – a Swedish fintech company catering digital financial services like online payments
– Amount – a financial institution with a variety of products and services for digital and mobile customer experience.
– Plaid – a financial services company that builds data transfer network empowering fintech and related products
– Anchorage Digital – a crypto-asset platform and infrastructure provider dealing with holding, investing, and infrastructure for cryptocurrency and crypto-related products
– Kraken – cryptocurrency exchange and bank based in the United States of America, founded in 2011
– Moonpay – also a digital trading platform for buying and selling cryptocurrencies
There are also a number of names that might be new in our ears such as:
– Happy Money – a lending company that develops and delivers financial products and services
– MobileCoin – a peer-to-peer cryptocurrency platform founded in 2017 branding itself as the first carbon-negative cryptocurrency
– M1 Finance – an American firm founded in 2015, that offers a robo-advisory investment platform with brokerage accounts, digital checking accounts, and lines of credit
– Mercury – a financial firm that offers services for startup companies and investors
As many countries realize the significant factor the Fintech sector contributes in terms of economic advancement, we may see a future of the Fintech market with an intermixed leaderboard for the top list of Fintech Unicorns. This is also coming from the fact that many of these countries are starting to establish business and economic models that promote further technological advancement and innovations.
When talking about rising countries that may alter the course of Fintech leaderboards in the future, there are two nations that experts are looking into – Brazil and Malaysia.
Home to over three hundred (300) Financial technology companies and holding the title of being the second largest fintech hotspot in Latin America, Brazil could soon produce billion-dollar fintech unicorns. According to some analysts, the financial market of Brazil seems to be going into the right track of development.
Innovations could be expected as the Central Bank of Brazil takes proper actions supporting market competitiveness and promoting financial education. The Central Bank has also started the establishment of open banking early last 20, which was deemed as a favorable action for many fintech companies.
On the opposite side of the globe, many finance experts are looking forward to how Malaysia would rise into the future. Given the country’s huge portion with unbanked and underbanked areas, Malaysia is deemed as an opportunity-haven for fintech.
More so, one key factor in the country is its high rates in terms of internet penetration. With the recent data available, almost 50% of Malaysia’s financial sector are companies that specialize in online products and mobile services.
As these countries work on rectifying their economic strategies, it will be a scene worth-to-watch which nation will be the next home for fintech unicorns.
The number of unicorns, in general, has been immensely growing since the term was used by Aileen Lee almost a decade ago. As of June 2022, there are over 1,100 unicorn companies under the list by CB Insights.
Based on the recent study made by Crunchbase early this year, the general demand for sound investments attracted businessowners to invest into start-up companies, helping them into becoming unicorns by reaching the 1billion-dollar mark.
This same study indicated that numbers of unicorns show fintech hubs and crypto companies usually rose in valuation during the initial phase of fundings. Based on Crunhbase’s own unicorn list, over twenty Fintech companies reached the $1 billion-mark last 2021 during the early phase, while sixteen crypto hubs did the same.
For now, how the number of unicorn club ‘members’ will change in the future is not certain. A number of studies suggested that the sudden upsurge of unicorns last year 2020 and 2021 was a surprising scene in Fintech, indicating that this might result in a more challenging fund accumulation.
There were also some indications that reaching the unicorn-level of funds may not be as huge as many see it to be. It has been suggested that the mere chance of earning this label might not be enough to draw investors without proper outputs from the companies.
The United Kingdom government is set to release new restriction frameworks for cryptocurrency and related businesses. The rest of the industry hopes that this will provide more clarity to fill in the current gaps and loopholes.
Early this April 2022, Her Majesty’s (HM) Treasury of the United Kingdom publicized that the government’s economic and finance ministry is on its planning phase for a new framework for stablecoin regulations.
They announced that with this soon-to-be-released restriction package, stablecoins will be regulated under the U.K.’s current payment framework as the beginning of the composite initiative from the government to build a crypto hub with a vigorous compliance process.
What does this mean for stablecoin business providers?
Generally, following the payment regulatory framework created in 2017 would entail that stablecoin providers should be required to register their ventures with the U.K.’s financial regulator called FCA or Financial Conduct Authority. This would mean further compliance with necessary conditions and following restrictions specific to payment transactions and services.
For the Innovate UK Award Winner Kene Ezeji-Okoye, the current President of Millicent (a stablecoin research company from the U.K.), this announcement from the financial ministry could potentially provide the long-waited clarity on how crypto-business such as Millicent could maintain compliance with the government.
The current business model of Millicent is covered under the current regulatory system of the FCA for digital currencies. However, given that the company plans to expand in owning accountability over public’s cryptographic functions, Millicent could then be considered as a crypto-asset company with supposedly different laws and regulations to comply with.
Kene Ezeji-Okoye, together with other companies and the rest of the crypto community, is hopeful that the incoming rules and regulations for stablecoins will soon fill in the gaps for business owner compliance.
The United Kingdom government has previously made it clear its goal for the crypto industry – to create a global hub for crypto-related technologies and businesses. Together with this ambition, they have announced a series of projects, including legislations that will acknowledge and legitimize stablecoins as payments for transactions and services, among others.
This ambition received a warm welcome not just from the public, but also from many business providers, even regulators.
For Gemini, a U.K.-based cryptocurrency exchange company and a stablecoin provider, optimistically applauded the U.K. authorities for having the initiative in manufacturing regulatory packages for stablecoins. They pointed out that the upward trend of stablecoin usage in the industry clearly summons the government to do so.
A representative from Tether concurred with this statement from the fellow stablecoin company, adding that the United Kingdom could be one of the pioneering nations to build proper regulatory guidance on this kind of crypto asset.
Correspondingly, regulators have the same positive feedback on this move by the U.K. financial authorities.
Simon Cohen of Ontier LLP, a global crypto law firm, asserted how they greatly appreciate the U.K government for acknowledging the significance of robust restrictions for cryptocurrencies and other related digital assets.
Back in year the 2019, Financial Conduct Authority stated that crypto providers involved in international transactions should comply with payment-related laws, but the digital assets itself would not be covered over by the regulations. This is expected to change with the recent announced legislation by the HM Treasury.
The FCA recently clarified that they greatly welcome any plans by the government in manufacturing new laws and regulations for cryptocurrencies, asserting that they would continue to support the authorities.
Last 2021, Her Majesty’s (HM) Treasury of the United Kingdom has performed various research and consultations on stablecoins, for which results were released together with the recent announcement for future regulatory framework.
The studies made reported that even though not all crypto issuers can comply with all the standard restrictions, there was a general alignment that those stablecoins founded by a single fiat currency should be compliant with the conditions specific for digital payments and related transactions.
The HM Treasury aims to ensure that all crypto issuers will be registered with the FCA, complying with its rules and safety measures. This means that the soon-to-be-released framework would not only alter the current payments regulatory packages, but also the rules for electronic money (or e-money) to expand the scope including stablecoins.
However, the report has not yet detailed out every requirement for stablecoins but mentions that the development will be advanced with the aid of the U.K.’s Bank of England and Payment Systems Regulator.
Based on the Treasury’s consultation report, there is currently a general understanding among providers that stablecoins and related activities should follow the compliance measures set by the Bank of England. For instance, once a company is identified as compliant with the requirements under the Banking Act, the company would then be classified as systemic, which should be controlled under the FCA and the Bank of England.
The report mentioned that all stablecoins backed by fiat currency, either single or multiple, would be under the scope of the forthcoming regulatory framework.
Meanwhile, algorithmic stablecoins, or those founded by assets aside from fiat, should not be covered. These algorithmic coins are decentralized digital assets created to maintain its value using codes and programming, controlling its supply based on its price. In essence, these are expected to be self-sufficient without any collateral.
In relation to this, many experts pointed out that it would really be a great challenge for policymakers to apply or pattern rules from the current regulations to these algorithmic coins, given its complexity and distinctive nature.
Even with the current pacing that the U.K. government is taking in terms of regulating cryptocurrencies, there is still too much work to be done.
Just early this year, several studies have shown that the United Kingdom was relatively slow in stepping into cryptocurrencies, in comparison with the other nations, especially from both Asia and Middle East.
A spokesperson from YouGov, a global public opinion and research data company, pointed out in a study that even though huge growth is anticipated for crypto space in the U.K. market, further potential is being held back by safety and compliance issues.
In the same study, they clarified that even with the recent news from the U.K government for its plans related to the crypto industry, it is still a question mark whether these would be enough to provide assurance and gain public trust.
Even with the recent public announcement by the U.K government on its plans, there is still lack of coherence and clear view on what really to expect, leaving the rest of the industry yearning for more clarity
In the previously released consultation report, the HM Treasury clarified that the plans they currently have in progress will be developed with utmost assurance of flexibility over the regulatory frameworks given that definite descriptions could be rapidly left behind by the fast-changing industry.
Kene Ezeji-Okoye and many other company owners very much anticipate what would the U.K. government provide in the near future, and which questions will be answered favorably.
How would stablecoins be defined? Which coins will be legitimized as a payment method? Which coins would be covered in which set of regulations?
Want to read more on cryptocurrencies and regulatory matters? Visit our page at https://coredo.eu
All financial transactions are regulated by a multitude of laws, legal acts, and rules that all legitimate companies must comply with. All financial systems use certain principles to verify their users and customers, allowing them to fight money laundering and illegal money circulation more effectively.
Understanding the modern principles of how financial institutions work is useful not only for business representatives and bank employees but also for ordinary users. Therefore, in this article, we will analyze in detail what is behind the abbreviations AML and KYC, which are actively used in business.
AML is a system of laws and principles aimed at preventing and detecting money laundering and terrorism financing. The abbreviation stands for “Anti-Money Laundering”. For most financial institutions, AML is a set of processes and approaches based on the analysis of aggregated data about users and their financial activities.
Simply put, AML is a set of steps financial institutions must take to prevent criminals from using their services to launder illicit money or finance terrorism.
AML is also sometimes referred to as “anti-laundering laws” because they are designed to prevent criminals from “laundering” incomes received by illegal means and financing criminal activities.
Various tools, internal procedures, and control measures are used for this purpose, such as monitoring financial transactions and detecting suspicious activity.
In particular, automated analytical systems analyze the activities of a particular user and determine whether the available information about the client corresponds to the transactions that he or she performs.
In the case that the system fixes a transaction that does not correspond to the particular user’s standard behavior, it signals the need for verification.
The concept of AML first began to be widely used in 1989, after the intergovernmental organization FATF (Financial Action Task Force) was founded in Paris to develop anti-money laundering measures.
This organization develops international standards related to the prevention of money laundering, helps their implementation in different countries, and counteracts the financing of terrorism.
AML principles are being implemented by many states at the national level and in most cases, the recommendations and standards of the FATF are taken as the basis. An important part of the process is the rejection of anonymous financial transactions and instead, fighting for their transparency. That is, financial institutions can and even must monitor the activities of their customers, identify suspicious transactions and report them to the appropriate authorities.
For conducting financial activities in the European Union, it is important to know that since 2015 the EU has adopted a modernized regulatory framework that includes several anti-money laundering (AMLD) directives. The most recent 6th directive, which entered into force in June 2021, includes provisions that increase liability for financial crimes, expand the list of such crimes, imply closer cooperation between European states in fighting money laundering, etc.
The abbreviation KYC stands for “Know Your Customer”. This principle obliges financial institutions to identify users before making a transaction.
According to the KYC rules, anonymous financial transactions are illegal.
User identification can serve various purposes, namely:
The concept of KYC was implemented in 2016. It was introduced by the Financial Crimes Enforcement Agency (FinCEN) of the US Department of the Treasury. It was this agency that first suggested the use of formal KYC requirements.
However, even today there are no particular standards regarding what kind of user data should be requested. Each service and each company decides this individually, so the identification and verification procedures (checking the validity of the entered data) often differ significantly.
In most cases, clients are asked to provide:
As a rule, the specified data will have to be confirmed by providing a photo or a scanned copy of the relevant documents, as well as verifying the phone number via SMS. Additionally, online interviews may be conducted. The purpose of all these activities is to collect and verify customer data.
Today, KYC protocols are being implemented not only by traditional financial institutions, such as banks and insurance companies but also by crypto companies.
For example, the Binance cryptocurrency exchange and blockchain ecosystem require users to provide their full name, date of birth, and phone number for registration, and account verification requires identity confirmation in the form of a scanned copy of an identification document with a photo (passport, driver’s license, etc.) and a selfie with them.
Despite the obvious difference, the concepts of KYC and AML are regularly confused. In a broad sense, KYC is only a part of the measures taken to combat money laundering. Other elements of the AML principles are CDD – Customer Due Diligence, EDD – Enhanced Due Diligence, risk assessment and continuous monitoring of transactions, internal audit and control, and more.
To follow the principles of AML, companies have to use a complex approach, which necessarily means the implementation of the KYC algorithm.
According to international analytics company LexisNexis Risk Solutions, global financial institutions spend more and more money every year to combat money laundering.
So, in 2020 this amount was about $181 billion, and in 2021 it has already increased to about $214 billion (source: https://risk.lexisnexis.com/global/en/about-us/press-room/press-release/20210609 -tcoc-global-study)
Particular dissatisfaction with the introduction of the principles of KYC and AML is expressed by users of blockchain technologies. In their opinion, the need for identification and verification discredits the very basis of their work, as they were initially presented as anonymous. On the other hand, the possibility to make financial transactions anonymously could not fail to attract scammers, which endangered honest users.
Therefore, cryptocurrency exchange services and other players in the crypto industry are forced to agree with the requirements of regulatory authorities and implement the KYC principle for user identification, as well as AML protocols for monitoring suspicious transactions.
Very often users are also dissatisfied with the need to go through multi-stage identity verification due to the length and complexity of all procedures. So, you can regularly meet complaints from dissatisfied customers about an inability to register on a particular service, verify an account, or pass the security control. Financial institutions are trying to deal with these difficulties and disadvantages.
Also, many clients of financial institutions express concerns about the safety of their personal data. Of course, banks, crypto-exchanges, and other services promise to ensure their security, but leaks occur and as a result, private information falls into the hands of fraudsters.
Despite some shortcomings and imperfections of the measures taken, as well as despite the dissatisfaction of users, the fact remains that the measures to combat money laundering and prevent financial crimes do work. Therefore, in the nearest future, they will likely not only be maintained but even tightened.
In nearly two decades, the U.S. dollar and Euro are close to parity for the first time. Here’s what to know and how it would impact the economy.
Due to the recent economic tremors in Europe, the Euro has recently continued with its five-year decline, raising the possibility of parity with the U.S. dollar for the first time in 20 years.
This wrestle between the two largest and most traded currencies globally is now coming to the closest fight after a long time with the recent 7% slide of the Euro against the U.S. dollar.
However, specialists are still divided. Will we really get the long-waited euro-dollar parity soon? How soon is soon? How will this impact the economy, and what will it mean for investors?
Early this May 2022, the value of 1 euro is playing around 1.05 U.S. dollars and eventually slid down to 1.03 U.S. dollars the following week.
This continuous decline of the Euro is deemed to be a result of market disinclination due to public concerns related to multiple economic tremors.
These primarily include the devastating war between Ukraine and Russia, continuous upstream inflation rate, issues in business logistics, lack of growth, and strengthening of financial regulations, which have caused investors aversion, leaning towards traditional and much safer assets, consequently resulting in a much-strengthened U.S. dollar.
On top of this, changes in financial regulations within the U.S. and European central banks impacted this narrowing of euro-dollar parity.
Last May 2022, the U.S. Federal Reserve increased its loan rates by 0.5 % for the second time this year as it expects a rise in the inflation rate.
Recently, the Chair of the Federal Reserve of the United States, Jerome Powell, reaffirmed the central bank’s goal to lessen inflation and pull it down closer to 2 percent. Powell announced that they would continue raising loan rates as necessary until inflation declines to a much more controllable measure.
On the contrary, the European Central Bank has not yet made any increments to their interest rates in spite of Europe’s continuous inflation hike across states. Although the ECB has acknowledged how the unrestrained decline of the Euro impacts market stability which causes price hikes for U.S.-sourced products, there has been no sign of immediate actions in place.
Aleksandar Tomic, an economist from Boston College, mentioned that the parity between the two currencies might be sooner than most think and could possibly happen within the following months.
Market experts indicated that the way to a euro-dollar parity might need another major decline in the European economy relative to the U.S., something similar to what happened after the war between Russia and Ukraine.
Samuel Zief from JPMorgan pointed out that even though Europe would be shaken by something similar, the supposed parity between the two currencies will be the worst-case scenario.
Zief also noted that the U.S Fed’s hawkish increase in interest rates already covers the supposed hike for the next two years, which does not look good for the Euro.
Specialists from the Canadian Bank of Montreal suggested that aside from changes in monetary regulations between the Federal Reserves and the ECB, there are also the energy supply deficiencies and payment fluctuations that are pulling down the value of the Euro.
Since the start of 2022, the dollar index has been skyrocketing by around 8 percent, even with the subsequent interest rate increase by the Fed.
George Sarravelos from Deutsche Bank pointed out that the industry is now at the point where further monetary and economic tremors erode the Fed’s predictions. At the same time, the rest of the world, specifically Europe, faces the consequences.
Sarravelos suggested that the European economy will continue to surpass the U.S. and dodge any recession, as opposed to what the majority expects.
Although the recent study by Deutsche Bank specified that the American dollar is at its highest peak since the pandemic, their predictive data implies that the euro-dollar valuation would not go down to reach parity.
Although many currency specialists are still doubtful that the market will reach the long-waited euro-dollar parity, a massive portion of the industry expects the European market to continue the downstream path.
Several economists noted that the recent aggressive action by the European Central Bank is still not at par with that of the U.S. Fed, insufficient to knock off the inflation hike across Europe.
Some experts suggested that a much less hostile approach should be expected from the ECB, with incremental turns in increasing borrowing rates.
Jonas Goltermann from Capital Economics argued that the constant decline of the European economy with its vulnerability in the local and global market clearly implies further downstream for the Euro against the U.S. dollar. He mentioned that the euro-dollar parity could be expected by the end of 2022, in contrast to the Deutsche Bank’s forecast data.
The European Commission had previously released its proposed set of rules for Markets in Crypto-Assets (or MicA), which is expected to simplify crypto-related regulations.
There is known around the globe that there is a considerable gap in our current financial regulations, specifically on how many crypto-related activities are not covered by the existing legacy restrictions. Europe and other countries worldwide have been exerting efforts to fill these gaps. With this goal in mind, the E.U. Union has recently released its proposed restriction framework for MiCA or Markets in Crypto-Assets.
The suggested European regulation on Markets in Crypto Assets, or MiCA, was previously discussed in the country’s Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs. MiCA is essentially a set of existing European laws, amplified for crypto-assets and amended for consistency and proportionality. This framework objectifies manufacturing a mechanism that grants an innovative market while addressing risks that new technologies present and warranting a proposition consistent across markets.
The MiCA project is just a part of the many strategies created to ensure that the European financial industry will adapt to the growing virtual space. This proposal mainly discusses stablecoins which it subcategorizes as “asset-referenced tokens.”
Unlike USDC and USDT, which are only backed by the U.S. dollar, these tokens are built on the foundation of multiple fiat currencies or blockchain assets.
With MiCA, once a blockchain business is given a license in any of the 27 European states, it will be applicable in all other states, meaning the firm could do its venture without additional local approvals. With this, rapid growth for crypto businesses is expected to be vastly simplified.
However, many experts have noted how the MiCA regulations are different from other countries.
For example, although the United States of America has built multiple crypto-related laws in the past years, it has no identifiable one which matches MiCA. On the other hand, the Chinese government has recently banned crypto activities while creating its own central bank digital currency (CBDC).
The European Parliament cleared that the European Union is trying a different approach with its regulations, given the lack of harmony across the Union, with countries having inconsistent financial mechanisms.
The scope of the recent MiCA proposal only covers stablecoins and other cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin and ether. Central Bank Digital Currencies or CBDCs, security and deposit tokens, and other crypto-related assets are not in scope.
Even though the MiCA framework might sound enticing for crypto businesses, given that it will allow licenses to be applicable across different states, there have been some concerns from the industry on how it will impact the E.U. crypto market in other manners. Some have specified that even though license and legal assurance sounds attractive enough, stricter rules and mandates under MiCA might impede investments and innovations.
With the current prerogative that each European states have, various approaches in terms of crypto directives are being applied in each country. Each state had to create its bylaws and mandates for crypto tokens, in line with a few guidelines that all had to adhere to.
In the past few years, countries across Europe have initiated regulatory implementations primarily compelled by two factors:
These two served as guidelines to each state, providing objectives that should be attained but leaving the countries to manufacture laws on their own independently.
These differences each European country has in their crypto-related regulations have confused some industry players. Do they have to apply for licenses in almost 30 different states to be able to venture into Europe? How will they be able to leverage the freedom of movement for business activities?
Bitpanda, an Austrian cryptocurrency exchange company currently ventures across 37 states, has had to tediously work on multiple licenses and approvals locally within Europe.
The European Parliament mentioned that the MiCA initiative targets to guarantee that the European market will be able to keep up with the growing business of cryptocurrencies. They indicated that security for investors and customers should be upheld, with a competent market leveled with enough resources for the industry to understand and comply with.
The recently published MiCA framework generally covers digital assets, describing them as virtual versions or characterizations of money value, cached and used in digital transactions through blockchain technology. It subcategorizes these crypto-assets as below:
Under MiCA, business players of these cryptocurrency categories in Europe should obtain approvals and licenses in their respective local financial government bodies by sending white paper 20 days in advance.
In the crypto industry, a white paper is a business document with an investment roadmap created prior to any business release. The local government will then have the authority to approve and allow the emission of those assets.
Businesses that cater services related to these digital tokens must obtain a license in any European state. Once approval from any local government is obtained in accordance with the European laws, the expansion of crypto ventures will be allowed in other states without any additional licenses. With this, the local custom-made regulations in each state would no longer be applied.
With MiCA, countries with strong regulations and licensing processes for digital tokens will have a much easier and more efficient mechanism, following the new conditions applicable across Europe.
Despite this, the European Union clarified that security measures and compliance would not be neglected.
Based on the assessment by the European Union, the price of a white paper under MiCA would be much higher for crypto businesses, with compliance costs of around 4 thousand USD to 87 thousand USD, depending on complexity and the level of legal interventions necessary.
With this, industry experts raised concerns, pointing out that growing licensing costs might result in investors moving to other states outside Europe.
Back in the year 2019, Facebook (now called Meta Platforms) announced its Libra initiative, a stablecoin supposedly to be founded under multiple platforms and multiple fiat currencies. However, upon its announcement, the U.S. government raised scrutiny and mentioned that they had to study the impact of this project, ordering Facebook to halt the plan. Consequently, the company then announced that the vision would no longer continue but eventually rebranded the project under the name of Diem.
With the proposed MiCA framework, certain conditions and requirements for all stablecoin businesses will be applied, like the required capital funds ownership of 400 thousand Euros for all stablecoin business owners.
The proposal also detailed incremental conditions for “significant” business owners, defined as any business having activities of at least 500 thousand a day and at least 1 billion market cap.
These so-called significant businesses, such as USDC and USDT, will require additional conditions under MiCA, including having funds equivalent to 3 percent of its reserved assets.
For example, the stablecoin USDT, which currently has 25 billion USD, would need to warrant at least 75 million USD as its capital funds. As of writing, USDT has a net supply of only 72 million U.S. dollars.
Few business players mentioned that these additional requirements for considered significant users seem to be too much.
The MiCA proposal agreed and mentioned cautions with these specific conditions for significant users since these could potentially result in inconsistencies with its objective to secure continuous business innovation in the industry. However, the framework somehow justified this, pointing out the apparent risks to financial freedom and market stability.
However, it is deemed that the MiCA proposal would not be altered as of yet, given the recent issues for global stablecoins in the market. Just recently, USDT and USDC have received criticisms from both U.S. and E.U. markets regarding their unverified reserves.
Currently, most trading partners of Binance with a massive volume of transactions involve a stablecoin. With this, professionals indicated that regulations brought by MiCA would negatively impact the competitiveness of the European market. On the contrary, other specialists countered that the most significant matter is the promise of legal security and should be upheld over the state of stable coins.
With the current state of the MiCA project, effectivity is not expected until 2023. Until then, the status quo will continue, where each state must assess and create its own custom-made laws.
Whenever a group of friends in a restaurant, on a weekend getaway, or when neighbors in a shared house pay something, dividing bills and computing how much each one owes another can be a dreary and laborious process when a large group of people is involved.
How do you divide the cost? How much should a person contribute? Service charge? Isn’t it complicated? It’s just for small bills such as rent, water, and electricity.
The good news is that we have modern applications to help split the bills. Below are the top 5 listed in The Muse:
Have you tried any of these? Life could be much easier if you do.
In Europe, expense management has also been modernized. Revolutionized solutions were introduced, which helped build the foundation for modern expense management. These new platforms are known to provide quicker and more transparent payment solutions. Clients are attracted by their unique features, which differentiate one application from another.
A worldwide-leading expense application called “Tricount” headed by Jonathan Fallon and Guillebert de Dorlodot stood out from other companies in the industry. This company from Brussels, Belgium, focused on being neutral to whichever bank or financial institution the client would want to pay from. Hence, if you are a Tricount user, you have the freedom to choose a company with cheaper or even zero transfer fees and such.
Unlike other expense management applications, Tricount is not bounded to a number of banks or payment platforms. As per Fallon, they try to be as open and unbiased as possible. This means one does not need to be a bank “X” client to use their application.
Since they started in 2010, Tricount now has 5.2M registered customers and is giving them enough profit. Their clients are spread over several European countries – Belgium, Spain, France, and Italy – allowing users to split expenses among their friends and families. What’s more, the bill is categorized by its type and can be reimbursed for the outstanding balances through different payment systems.
To stand out more from its competitors, Tricount enables its users to make payments straightforwardly from their bank in just one click without requiring IBANs. It started in its based country, Belgium. This was made possible by establishing a partnership with Mastercard, a licensed virtual bank in Europe – Aion Bank, and a cloud-based banking-service provider, Vodeno.
As emphasized by Fallon in one of his interviews, the partnership gave them the opportunity that connects them to an open banking system which is easier in the region due to the revised Payment Services Directive, or PSD2. He also added that they wish to be fully launched with banks across Belgium before expanding to other markets.
Since open banking started in 2019 in Europe, it is still viewed as a new approach in the banking industry across the region. As per Fallon, it raised several legal and technical challenges, and action must be taken by such FinTech companies as a Tricount.
Despite all those challenges, entrepreneurs like Fallon believe that open banking has a huge potential. Other than offering just payment processes for reimbursement, there are still many features that the system can offer. One of those is credit provisions.
Fallon explained that, for example, there might be a group of ten tourists who could register in Tricount. These people could use their account to take out loans for plain tickets and split the expense among themselves through their Tricount account.
In continuation, the two founders of Tricount aimed to build up their app’s social feature, creating a more interactive interface that includes comment sections and user interaction in a group.
In addition, they also announced that they would need to expand their business to increase the integration on PSD2 to open more opportunities in the industry.
There are a hundred news today in the Financial Technology world. There are booming startup companies, merger of two established financial firms, cryptocurrency issues, fiat concerns, new banking schemes and payment solutions. We have listed below the current news today that will surely catch your attention and may be make up your mind for a certain financial decision. Check our latest financial technology news today:
An application with Buy Now, Pay Later payment method, Affirm, collaborated with the financial institution, Stripe, in May 31st, Tuesday. The goal is to drive growth by enabling Affirm’s Adaptive checkout feature. On the other hand, the BNPL startup company, Tranch, came out of stealth mode by raising a fund of 3.5M Pound sterling and collaborated with Yobota as well. Regarding crypto and fiat, Merge is now striving to connect the gap between the two.
Financial Technology startup, Merge, just raised funding and started using it to further develop its application-programming interface (API) – based financial platforms. This company is doing all it can to connect the gap between fiat and crypto payment systems. The whole project was spearheaded by Octopus Ventures in collaboration with a number of other investors.
This BNPL institution, Affirm, introduced Adaptive Checkout as their tool for financial innovation. It is a payment option that provides a selection of methods for its customers, bringing an even personalized approach.
Further, the Adaptive Checkout utilizes the firm’s smart descion-making engines to optimize its payment installment plans. This includes four no-interest payments that can be done twice a week, monthly payments, or an option to use both.
Those who had early access observed an average of twenty-six percent increase when converted. For more information, visit this link.
BNPL startup company, Tranch, in partnership with cloud-based financial technology firm Yobota, started to give their clients a more flexible and faster payment system. The two companies aimed to provide fast and flexible payment options, as a part of their strategy for driving sales, specifically among Gen Z and millennials. You can find out more here.
They also increased their fund, adding up 3.5 million pound sterling more from investors, which will be used for complex customer financial journey in the United Kingdom. Yobota, on the other hand, offered architecture with more flexibility, and API innovations.
This Bahrain-based open banking institution just started a collaboration with four banks in Saud Arabia. These banks are – Riyad Bank, Saudi British Bank, Alinma Bank, and Banque Saudi Fransi.
The Kingdom has a present population of thirty five million, and is considered one the largest Middle East countries.
The region, as a brief context, has a ninety-eight percent of internet access and ninety seven percent of smartphone access for 18-75 year olds.
Senator Michael Bennet and Representative Peter Welch proposed the United States Digital Platform Commission Act of 2022. This bill aims to establish a commission of five people, wherein their tasks is to protect consumers during the era of Big Tech. Further, the bill was formed with the ideas from different bills globally, particularly from those presented in the United States, Europe, and the United Kingdom.
These may be a lot to take in, but it’s not yet all. Visit our website at https://coredo.eu/ for more financial technology news and you might even want to take part in such venture. Our team also has professionals who can help you.
These days, financial institutions are not immune to problems, including bankruptcy and liquidation. For example, the Czech National Bank has recently published information on its website www.cnb.cz that Safe Payments Solutions s.r.o., acting under the Koalapays brand, https://www.koalapays.com (hereinafter “Koalapays”) lost its licence as a small electronic money issuer on 26.05.2022.
Pursuant to the peremptory legal norms, financial companies must fully return all funds to their customers. In practice, however, some customers are now only offered refunds of a small percentage of their deposits.
Until all funds are returned to their customers, financial companies are under the unrelenting supervision of the Czech National Bank.
What do we offer:
COREDO’s legal team is ready to help you resolve legal disputes with any financial institution. If you have unresolved claims, e.g. those related to Koalapays, we will be happy to offer our services.
Our legal team is ready to defend your interests in the most proactive way possible. We will be glad to help you with:
Experience shows, the first two steps are usually enough for us to protect your interests.
We are confident that we can help you and defend your rights!
The cost of our services:
The protection of your interests will be carried out at pre-agreed rates. The fee consists of a fixed fee, which you pay before we start cooperating, and a % of the amount in dispute, which we will be able to return to you.
About twenty years ago, United Arab Emirates (UAE) was considered one of the nations to incorporate technology into its economy. They are one of the leading countries in the Middle East to apply digital transformation in the financial and real estate sectors.
As such, blockchain technology is not a stranger to UAE. Restaurants have been accepting crypto coins as payment for their goods and services. Blockchain has been taken at the national level as well. “Dubai Blockchain Strategy” was launched in October of 2016, when His Highness Sheikh Hamdan publicly announced that the said city in the country would be the very first to implement cryptocurrency in government transactions.
Now, as per Trading Platforms, here are the top 6 crypto exchange platforms in UAE:
Click the respective platforms for more information. Now, let us focus on the sixth one – Kraken.
This major crypto exchange platform can be said to be beginner-friendly. Users can easily buy, sell, and trade among the over one hundred twenty supported coins, which includes the top ones, Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH).
It was founded in 2011 in San Francisco, California but operates and has offices globally. Kraken also supports both individual and organizational investors.
New cryptocurrency investors may start with the exchange using the main Kraken system. On the other hand, advanced and professional traders may opt to use the Kraken Pro, a lower-cost version with improved futures system features.
The good thing about Kraken is that it is, as mentioned earlier, beginner and user-friendly due to its simple interface. It also has a high liquidity trade and supports about 120 crypto tokens.
However, it has higher trading fees when one is not using the Kraken Pro. Further, there are reported cases of losses due to hacking.
Kraken, aUS-based crypto platform, has just expanded in the Middle East. After securing their license to administer the exchange platform in UAE, a regional Kraken headquarters will be opened in Abu Dhabi.
Curtis Ting, the company’s managing director for Europe, the Middle East, and Africa (EMEA), expressed during an interview with CNBC’s Mr. Dan Murphy that they are incredibly thrilled and excited to set up their operations in Abu Dhabi Global Market finally.
Once launched, Kraken will be the leadoff crypto trading system to provide straightforward financing and exchange in dirhams (AED) versus bitcoin, ether, and other digital currencies after they obtain an operating license from the country’s regulatory authorities.
Ting emphasized that their main goal is to secure access for the users globally, which is essential to ensure that the investors and crypto traders have full access to their local currencies.
Kraken, which was launched more than a decade ago and is now operating in as many as sixty countries, voiced out that the launch in UAE symbolized a more playful strategy in the money-making region. Based on the report of Chainanalysis, the Middle East is considered a nation with the fastest-flourishing cryptocurrency industry globally, having seven percent of the world’s trading volume.
For the record, UAE now transacts around USD 25B worth of cryptocurrency annually. In volume-perspective, it is 3rd in EMEA, under Lebanon, which is worth USD 26B, and Turkey, which is USD 132.4B. These data were from a study conducted by Chainalysis from July 2020 to June 2021.
In addition, Citi’s global head of financial technology and digital assets, Ronit Ghose, was interviewed during “Capital Connection” on CNBC. Ghose explained that having an increase in entrepreneurs in Abu Dhabi is due to more stable and clarified regulations at ADGM, both in Dubai and from the federal perspective.
Further, he was also amazed that a few of the businesses in the UAE were generated even during COVID, in the past one to two years. As per Ghose, UAE is now being established as a cryptocurrency and Web3 hub.
Being known as the top crypto trading platform by volume, Binance has one of the most immense scopes in the Middle East, where digital currency is developing as the mainstream trading system.
It was licensed to operate in Abu Dhabi in the past weeks and is planning to gather about a hundred positions in the nation.
Another trading platform, Bybit, had also been approved to operate and open an office in Dubai last April. FTX, on the other hand, has also been licensed for digital asset operators in the same city and will open an office as well in the future.
Singapore and Hong Kong, financial centers in rivalry with Kraken, are also anticipating to generate an entirely regulated system for crypto exchange, looking to expand regulatory procedures to be appealing to investors and traders in a competitive condition.
One may think that there is no problem with cryptocurrency institutions in UAE because they are superior. However, they are now under close watch due to growing international investigation for their lack of transparency in their asset flows, which may be considered illegal.
It was reported that cryptocurrency institutions in the country had been overwhelmed with demand to liquidate billion-worth of digital assets since Russia-based investors are looking for protection for their possessions. This includes Dubai’s asset market, during the Russia-Ukraine war.
In April, Financial Action Task Force, the world’s leading anti-money laundering watchdog, also added Emirates to its grey list. Hence, the country needs close observation. The UAE, along with Panama, Syria, and Turkey, is now required to be monitored for threats under money-laundering circumstances.
In the interview with CNBC, Ting agreed that they should be heedful of the Anti-Money Laundering and Know-Your-Customer and all compliance requirements.
Furthermore, Ting advised that trust must be added to the management provisions that the authorities are developing to ensure that if a user is revealed and has full access to the systems that provide crypto products, accountability for each is presented.
Developers from the European Central Bank are set to take a centralized solution in building its digital euro, facing issues on privacy matters.
Multiple central banks around the globe have previously started their preparations to build CBDCs (Central Bank Digital Currency), also called digital money. In basic terms, these are digital versions of our regular cash or the so-called fiat currency.
Previously, the European Central Bank (ECB) announced that it would be starting its preparations for creating its digital euro. This decision has raised concerns and assumptions from the financial community. How would it work? What would be its purpose, and how would it impact the economy? How would it adhere to the fundamental values of the European Union (EU), such as privacy?
The European Union (EU) stated that developing its own digital currency is mainly to attain its strategic independence, which primarily pertains to economic sovereignty and political autonomy.
This initiative for a European CBDC was seen as a response by the ECB to a broader change brought by the virtual currencies and digitalization of money. With the fast-changing internet, virtual variants of money are emerging, primarily brought by digital currencies.
Privacy has always been on top of the list when talking about money in general, more so in digital money. Safeguards and preventive measures are what experts and the financial community mostly scrutinize regarding digital currencies.
Previously, the ECB has ensured the public that privacy will be on top of its priorities. However, in its most recent reports, it seems like this is not the case.
The ECB pointed out that aside from privacy, the public has other competing concerns which might be considered for trade-offs, such as global market acknowledgment and security.
In a recent report, the central bank detailed that they would have visibility to specific data and transactions but ensured that these would not be accessible to anyone. The ECB also clarified that the European government economic committee is not looking for a profit-making business by exploiting private data and guarantee that they will adhere to every existing privacy law.
However, the community has shown concerns about this planned design, with data being centrally handled by the central bank, pointing out that this makes privacy more impossible to achieve. Experts mentioned that the public has the right to ask questions and be bothered by a government having massive control over private information. They indicated that even though the government might have less motive to misuse data, that does not entail there is no danger at all.
Aside from this, crypto developers indicated that privacy measures largely depend on the type of blockchain technology used. Experts suggested that embedding privacy into a digital euro might only be achieved through a distributed system. This way, the central bank would not be able to amass private data, and the risk of misusing this could be lessened.
Recent reports from the European Central bank (ECB) mainly lean toward a more centralized design rather than a distributed one. This probably means that the central bank would centrally handle data and assets instead of circulating them freely.
This has raised concerns, not just by experts but also from the public, that this apparent favor towards a centralized blockchain technology would raise various privacy issues. Crypto professionals warned that the banking industry and the current regulatory mechanisms might not be prepared for such. They pointed out that these possibilities would need grave and consequential redesigning of the overall blockchain ecosystem.
Some have expressed concerns that a digital euro might be more of a problem than an economic and business opportunity.
A study by the European Central bank (ECB) shows that many of the public believe that a European CBDC will damage the crypto market, even without a real understanding of what the digital euro entails. The ECB clarified that thorough studies and investigations are ongoing to ensure preparedness and proper safeguards.
Faustine Fleuret, the CEO of ADAN (a crypto company from France), mentioned that a European CBDC poses a considerable threat to innovation, as it might conclude as a replacement, rather than a supplement, to the currently existing European stablecoins, given the lack of flexible mechanisms a centralized has.
U.S. President Joe Biden has recently released an executive order pushing forward studies and development for digital assets.
Since its release, this had garnered attention and different opinions from the public. Most experts have greeted this as a possibility for better regulations and development of the digital asset industry.
But what does this exactly mean for the digital community and the current banking systems? Should we be expecting the long-waited American CBDC soon?
One major thing that many experts have observed from the executive order was the lack of any immediate policies and regulations. Rather, it contains long lists of call-for-action items for multiple branches of the government to operate and perform exhaustive studies from every aspect.
During the drafting period of the executive order, many had expressed scrutiny and concerns, thinking that this would involve excessive regulations that would hinder current digital transactions and activities. But in contrast, the report rather reaffirmed that cryptocurrency is here for us to embrace and deal with.
The executive order reflects how the U.S. is taking the right track for the digital industry, acknowledging its significance for America’s competitiveness in the financial market.
Instead of manifesting some kind of repression for the industry, we received an order directing agencies to responsibly identify issues and perform studies to outline necessary resolutions. This had apparently conveyed the Biden administration’s desire to harness the presented profits while securing a safe industry.
Many experts have previously called out that the U.S. should start mobilizing its arm s and draft regulations, given that digital assets are greatly taking over the financial sector. Given the amount of change crypto had caused, we should start minimizing any systematic risk as soon as possible.
The crypto market has been growing at a high speed, impacting our traditional financial systems. Based on multiple studies, these are some of the signs that a financial crisis is hitting a market. It is important that we invest in regulations to ensure minimal impact in case of any disruptions.
However, we should be cautious that together with certainty, the public also demands favorable regulations.
This is the exact reason why some experts have expressed concerns that actions from the U.S. government might cause regulatory issues the community might find too exhaustive, resulting in customers shifting to other countries with much more favorable policies.
A quite major portion of the executive order leans towards sustaining the economic competitiveness of the U.S. market by ensuring efficient services while keeping up safe and well-regulated transactions.
However, in reality, things are much more complicated than mere words. There would always be the fear that one day, we might wake up with an industry regulated too tightly.
The Crypto industry was once a self-regulating business. However, in actuality, there would always be interventions from the government, one way or another.
Upon the release of Biden’s executive order, Thomas Vartanian, a writer, and a famous banking expert, remarked that most issues we encounter with digital assets are inherent from historical issues we have from the internet, which we are still trying to keep firm grip on .
In his books, Thomas had previously called out for a much more secure internet space. He mentioned that the lack of action over the last decades regarding the matter is alarming. Now, he is troubled by the apparent fact that more forms of digital assets, including CBDCs, will soon transition to the unsecured platform we have – that is, the internet.
As we progress with various studies on digital assets, we should expect that these types of concerns will be addressed. However, some financial veterans have given warnings that these explorations might give us results that are not as pleasing as we want. There are numbers of experts who are sceptical about how the digital industry would impact the overall financial sector, given the limitless number of things that could wrong.
Crypto has been here for more than a decade and we’ve been handling it well so far, however, an awful amount of loss would be ahead of us if we do not continue working with it smartly.
Although the recent executive order by the White House does not provide certain directives regarding the establishment of an American central bank digital currency or CBDC, its instructions are clear to mobilize federal agencies for further studies and preparations.
The report provides a noticeable sense of urgency towards CBDC and a clear prominence of the U.S. entering the competition. There’s quite an emphasis on the U.S. maintaining its global market leadership, which received different responses and opinions from the community.
Few banking institutions have expressed concerns on how their businesses would be impacted by creating a CBDC, specific to activities such as funding and lending.
Conversely, experts pointed out that the banking industry should not treat CBDC as a competition, but instead leverage it for further service development, given the number of roles private banks could take part in, once created.
The executive order clearly pushes forward the concept of an American CBDC, in relation to the notable slow progress of the Federal Reserves Board in terms of conducting studies. The Fed has been long waiting for a directive from Congress and the executive branch, and with this recent order by the President, we should expect the Fed to act and move forward.
Additionally, the order has provided instructions to the Justice and Treasury departments to perform necessary preparations for any legislative changes needed upon establishing a U.S. CBDC.
Although no words are set in stone, the executive order is an apparent nudge from the White House calling a huge sense of urgency for CBDCs.
Although the U.S. government has called the “highest urgency” for CBDCs, the same is not shared by the rest of the community, as many emphasise the risks that this would cause in the traditional systems.
Some banking veterans pointed out that many from the financial sector have the misconception that faster and smoother transactions could only be attained through CBDCs. They expressed their concerns that the U.S. federal should look at the matter with a more careful approach given the huge role the U.S. dollar plays in the global financial market.
Although some other nations are getting ahead in terms of testing and pilots, specifically China with its e-CNY, some experts stated that this shouldn’t be an important consideration for the U.S.
Even though it might seem like this is China’s indirect attack to put the U.S. dollar down in the global market, experts mentioned that the U.S. shouldn’t confuse it for a need to rush and compete, without proper preparations.
Although the executive order has clearly shown how the U.S government is leaning towards the creation of CBDCs, one thing that the community agreed on is the lack of any signs that the authorities favor any type of digital assets. So far, the mandate is clear that digital assets in general would be developed and studied.
The executive order has not shown any impact on the current business activities and no noticeable actions are taken by the digital community. The industry continues with its plans but should be more cautious as changes might come faster and sooner than expected.
This order is a good way to spark conversations as we go through the rapidly changing digital industry, however, we should expect that things would get rough once we go into details.
Visit our page at https://coredo.eu/contacts/ for more reads like this!
Estonia is one of the first countries to venture into cryptocurrency. They are the first member of the European Union to provide standard regulations and exercise control over cryptocurrencies. Hence, Estonia was known to be one of the top crypto-friendly countries in Europe.
Three years ago, in 2019, the Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU), a council established to gather suspicious activities of individuals and institutions, released about six hundred licenses for crypto. These licenses are called Virtual Currency Service Provider licenses. When looking into Estonian law, an institution that received its license is required to do business six months after its license has been released.
Come 2020, the regulators further tighten their control by emphasizing that virtual currencies must be treated just how traditional financial firms are. This means they should also comply with Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act.
In 2021, Estonian authorities revoked about 2000 crypto licenses. The nation’s government made the rules even stricter by adding audited annual reports and due diligence for digital financial institutions.
Today, crypto enthusiasts are required to get a license under the new Estonia cryptocurrency regulation.
As regulations are the weakest point of cryptocurrency, authorities are finding a way to combat this. One of the solutions they introduced is by applying Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Act in the crypto world.
Now, what is AML Act? Generally, it refers to a series of laws, procedures, and regulations a country has to unmask illegal funds that are disguised as legitimate earnings.
It was a response in the ever so growing virtual currency industry wherein tokens may be used for illegal purposes. This act has requirements that a business must comply with. In doing so, financial institutions may also develop a more sophisticated system of due diligence that would benefit both their customers and their management.
In Estonia, AML Act was applied on the 23rd of February 2022. The biggest updates regarding this are listed below.
These newly introduced definitions are an addition to the current service types the industry has. Since digital currency is defined to be a service in the paradigm where virtual keys are produced for the clients or clients’ encrypted virtual keys, these are very useful in storing and exchanging digital currencies.
It was previously defined that a digital currency exchange service is where an individual’s or firm’s virtual currency can be traded for a fiat one, or vice versa, or against another digital currency.
Now, the two new types of services listed above must be interpreted in agreement with the recommendations set forth by Financial Action Task Force (FATF), an institution that implements counselling for anti-money laundering and counters terrorist financing measures. As per FATF, one’s revision is not in compliance with the regulations until they offer the listed services above.
Decentralized Finance (DeFi) and Web 3.0 programs have always been the top concern and are in agreement that real decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) type programs must be maintained beyond the realm of regulations. This concept includes local-based apps, wherein all users must coordinate with another user to have the capacity to provide and move the service, and involves software programmers whose function is to process the verdict of the DAO to execute a role into the crypto protocol.
In the course of the conversation, the Estonian government commented the following: their country’s legislation cannot make up for the window of individuals in decentralized financial services. To emphasize, their regulations do not focus on such services and technological advancements.
The modification must be interpreted in association with the current standard of the definition of the service provider. That is, say, please see below:
More so, the digital currency institutions are required to be evaluated according to the substantial will of the institution and the type and purpose of their businesses.
The path of these newly introduced laws and regulations is obviously not far from their original drafts. However, they are more compassionate in some sectors. You may find the updates of the new regulation compared to the current ones below:
How much does the license application costs? Currently, it is about € 10000, a great increase from the initial € 3,300 only.
Please take note of the deadlines below:
If you need more help with the licensing, we have financial experts who could help you. You may reach us at Coredo.
Decentralized Finance, or DeFi, originated with the hopes of having a financial system that would allow its end users to trade currencies without the need to undergo any government control.
In 2009, bitcoin (BTC) was introduced as the first DeFi asset in the cryptocurrency industry. It was a big hit, especially for crypto geeks, and is now considered one of the major investments a coin holder can have. BTC paved the way for the development of DeFi, in general.
Six years into the technology, in 2015, another coin entered the market – Ethereum (ETH). It gave rise to the Initial Coin Offering (ICO) market which enabled the whole industry to be in the mainstream, being comparable to traditional financial services.
DeFi was further modernized in 2020 due to the pandemic. Since existing firms were pinned down by the lockdown, Decentralized Financial applications were developed to cater to those who cannot be entertained by the traditional firms. Such applications enabled DeFi individuals who lost their jobs to borrow, lend, and invest during the pandemic.
We can say that DeFi is like an oasis in the desert of financial instruments. It serves a variety of services which is currently the key to keeping it running.
Having a virtual peer-to-peer system, DeFi does not pose a barrier to any monetary transaction and is inclusive to all. Hence, they can operate like conventional brokers and banks, but in a digital way.
As such, it keeps on convincing individuals and institutions to invest in them and take DeFi products and services as another form of the trading process.
To back this claim up, three big institutions have invested in DeFi – State Street Corporation, Fidelity Investments Inc, and BNY Mellon.
Learn more: DeFi is taking over the institutional markets
While it is indeed true that DeFi is evolving quickly and on a positive trajectory, there are still issues that make this industry a cause for concern.
First is its weak foundation in the regulatory system. International Organization of Securities Commissions or IOSCO released a report stating that although DeFi is mirroring the regulations traditional markets have, it is still insufficient. Yes, it is acknowledged that it brings investors several benefits, however, it also possesses multiple risks.
IOSCO reported on the 24th of March that it developed a new team to develop policies to lessen the risks of the fast-pacing industry. The same firm announced that the team will be comprised of ninety-five percent of securities regulators globally. It is intending to have a standard regulation for DeFi.
Another worry is regarding conflict of interest. To provide some background information, the most familiar Decentralized Financial tokens are decentralized exchanges (DEX’s), exchanging crypto, loaning applications, and blockchain programs.
IOSCO’s study, suggests that though DeFi was designed to have a peer-to-peer ecosystem, virtual open markets still have centralized controls. Such markets are project developers, venture institutions, and several financial investors with exceptionally large control of the crypto administration coins which can vote on admin matters. Thus, the issue of conflict of interest arises.
Tokens in DeFi are being managed by a smart system called decentralized autonomous organizations or DAOs, either in its starting or advanced phase. Every arrangement is selected through a voting process via a one-to-one, token-vote methodology.
This is where we can see the gap in its administration since most decisions are made by voting, may it be for a minor or significant issue. It, therefore, results in having holders of huge coins even if they only have small votes.
Further, even though DeFi claims to be decentralized, changing information and votes makes it centralized in real life. The reason is that investors still communicate through platforms, for example, Discord, which allows them to discuss how the investment will go through, of course, for their advantage. And taking into account that the number of voters is not big, the possibility of conflict of interest emerges.
Aside from that, several individual investors maintain their coins in the care of major centralized trading platforms. This may bring forth an effect for their customers’ coins to be voted, however, in smaller chances.
One more concern is considered when blockchain authenticators reinforce bonds for better practices which permit them to conduct the latest business arrangements toward a blockchain in trade for brand new crypto coin premium. Symmetrical to BTC-based mining with no ecological issues, authenticators are chosen in a random pattern to create more tokens congruent to the amount of what they invested.
In conclusion, a large number of authenticators motivate coin owners to allocate – loans to them, specifically – their coins in a swap for a portion of the premium. This grants them voting powers for those coins.
More so, IOSCO emphasized that multiple large-scale centralized trades give users a clear path towards decentralized financial applications and self-executing agreements. It is also worth noting that others even provide customers with the capability to finance in loaning and investment programs digitally, undoubting the trade’s process.
However, as previously mentioned, there are still remarkable risks which include conflict of interest, unexpected currency fluctuations, potential loss of investment portfolio concerning cryptocurrency-asset management via ownership, and risk in exchange.
DeFi administration also has a minor influence on voters. That is through what they call the “Bribe Protocol” which means that one can pay the industry’s governing body to hold cryptocurrency coins and vote right.
As Decentralized Finance is now established, individuals and institutions are encouraged to enter the market. They are risking their savings and funds in hopes to leap into the emerging industry and loan their consolidated possessions to something that has become collected money that is liquid enough to serve both all and no one, simultaneously.
On the contrary, the technological advancement of this new payment system has the promise of a free and inclusive financial process. Yes, there are regulatory issues, and it is still a work in progress, but DeFi is unquestionably a significant competitor of the existing financial institutions the world currently has. Globally, it is also great support for the economic system and capital appreciation.
Thinking about the future, one cannot only think about the amount of money DeFi can provide to the economy. Instead, investors must also consider how this money should be allocated and managed. There is always a threat from central financial institutions, but DeFi is resisting this and is being a threat to them as well.
So, what do you think about this? If you need advice, connect with us at Coredo.
The Czech National Bank has long been known for its devotion to transparency. Just recently, it won the prestigious Central Banking Transparency Award 2022 for its top tier initiatives in terms of programs and initiatives for disclosure. Just in 2021, the Czech National Bank has taken the bar to a new level, by introducing its new Monetary Policy Report, which replaced the old Inflation Report after 23 years.
The Monetary Policy Report is a quarterly publication that discloses issues, processes, and reasoning behind the central bank’s monetary strategies, plans, and programs by using non-technical words and terminologies that can be easily understood. Its launch has been acknowledged by the public as a great testament to CNB’s dedication to promoting transparent banking.
Followed by this new paper, the CNB also recently commenced the release of its attributed minutes, which mainly focuses on the independent dispositions of each board member, together with the bank’s economic forecasts.
This well-established adherence to transparency and proper communication by the CNB has been established through digital and traditional mechanisms, which undeniably aid in maintaining trust from the public and its stakeholders.
The Czech Monetary Department was the one who inaugurated the creation of CNB’s Monetary Policy Report, which was then highly assisted by the Board members of the bank. It aims to disclose comprehensive illustrations and presentations of monetary issues that were deemed essential by the national bank when they do analyze and make banking decisions.
An integral part of the report was the inclusion of some components that were missing in the CNB’s earlier Inflation Report, such as economic policy cogitations and deliberations, which before were only published internally. This, together with its concise and straightforward language, make the new Monetary Policy Report way superior and much preferred by the stakeholders to the earlier Inflation report.
The focal point of the report is the discussion of monetary programs and policies taken by the national bank, together with pertinent information that impacted those decisions. It includes comprehensive and elaborative presentations of the overall deliberation that happened, and the factors involved in the process.
Adapted from the earlier Inflation report, these new publications also include timely predictions of future banking positions and provide emphasis on the impact of local and multinational economic issues and development in the bank’s decision making. This significantly helps in sustaining public trust by providing profound awareness regarding the CNB’s current market position, economic predictions, and policy-making mechanisms.
The CNB’s communication division has previously mentioned that with the Monetary Policy report, they purposely altered the level of details and overall construction of the report, with the aim of offering a deeper kind of transparency to the public. They stated that their current goal is to provide reasonings and rationales behind its monetary strategies, together with exhaustive presentations of the bank’s predictions. The choice to use straightforward language is to make the papers more accessible and easily understood by the general public.
Upon the establishment of the Monetary Policy Report, CNB also started its initiative to publish their so-called “attributed minutes”.
The goal of these minutes is to apprise the stakeholders about the arguments and thinking process of the board behind their votes in any particular decisions. These minutes are intricate reports of rationales behind the decisions made by each member of the bank’s board.
The CNB aims to improve the predictability of the independent policy dispositions of the board members, and the central bank altogether. Some experts have previously raised concerns about possible attempts of attracting favorable attention to make decisions outside the board. However, the CNB stated that no signs of such are seen thus far.
With these attributed minutes, the board members’ judgements and independent points of view are not only available during internal deliberations but are now officially presented to the public. This way, the CNB believes that financial experts are well knowledgeable, and have a better insight in terms of the bank’s policy-making systems.
Aside from the release of the quarterly Monetary Policy report and the attributed minutes, the CNB has truly raised the bar in terms of transparency, by disclosing a report with a thorough elucidation of its forecasting model, called G3+.
The experience of CNB from the past decades motivated the creation of G3+, with new structural features that allow the bank to attain better prediction accuracy by taking factors of macroeconomic changes, locally and globally.
The report was released back in early 2021 and presents the new stylish features of the G3+ economic model, along with the rationale behind its adaptation. It was published with the aim of maintaining a reliable decision-making process through a transparent and accurate economic forecast.
The CNB has undeniably illustrated its great commitment with regards to transparency, and it can be said that the public trust the bank has attained is one of the fruits it is currently reaping. The growth of CNB’s social media accounts is a testament to this.
Recently, the CNB declared that their LinkedIn account has the most followers out of all Czech public organizations. Together with its Twitter and YouTube profiles, CNB has also set up an Instagram account and is also leveraging Facebook, in providing details behind its monetary initiatives. The CNB is now strengthening its digital customer connections through these platforms with various mechanisms to provide information.
The CNB believes that proper mechanisms for data disclosure are prerequisites to sustain public trust and are necessary to provide the bank’s perspective especially now, when the financial market is facing high inflation rates, impacted the pandemic constraints and supply chain issues.
Effective communication has proven to be necessary when the CNB encountered political pressure coming from the government last 2021 Czech elections.
The CNB was urged by the authorities to hold back any increase in rates, justifying that the then-inflation was stimulated by international countries. However, the CNB insisted on the rate increase, believing that the Czech’s economic position was different from other countries. This decision by the CNB was backed by the public’s support and was then proven right with the eventual price hike.
With that encounter, the CNB believes that the bank would serve its purpose by abiding by its mandate. This also convinced the CNB of how important independence and public trust in a national bank are.
Want to learn about fintech and banking? Connect with us using the link below!
Fintech and crypto experts show support for a U.S. central bank digital currency, but the Fed’s has not taken an explicit stand yet, but instead provided a detailed illustration of how establishing one in the U.S. could impact American banking.
Central Bank Digital Currencies or CBDCs are electronic or digital tokens like cryptocurrencies, being regulated and issued by a certain central bank. In more basic terms, CBDCs are just digital versions of your regular money or the so-called fiat currency, such as US dollars, Chinese CNY, and Philippine pesos .
Many countries have previously reported that their own CBDCs are under development, and some have even implemented them.
Recently, the U.S. Federal Reserve Board have issued a much-anticipated announcement, discussing the possibility of the U.S. implementing its central bank digital currency.
In this paper, the Board lays out a clear illustration of the direction a federal electronic currency could take, and how it could remarkably impact the future of the current traditional financial systems.
The report did not provide an explicit stance on whether the United States of America is ready to have its own digital currency and made it clear that the paper is not intended to show support for either side or provide any decision.
Rather, they mentioned that proceeding with an American CBDC is a resolution that should not be handled by the Board, but rather by Congress and the Executives.
The paper focuses on the meaning of “money”, specifically virtual currency, and how its different directions and variations could essentially modify banking. The Board outlined that electronic money that is dollar-oriented might be a simple and basic concept, but is more complicated in terms of usage, application, and future developments.
For example, there could be a CBDC dollar version that would be developed to perform scheduled transactions, which could be executed inside a blockchain without any human touchpoint. This suggests the possibility of micropayments in CBDC.
The Board’s report also detailed some alternatives in terms of policies and provided questions open to the public’s comments and suggestions.
Many experts in the banking and crypto market have previously pointed out that the U.S. is at the back of many other countries in terms of building its own CBDC. For example, China was the first of the nations that had taken action for its own CBDC, named e-CNY.
The Board stated that this undeniably impacts the international image of the U.S. dollar on the global financial market. They believe that the non-existence of a U.S digital currency makes other nations more captivating to the public and that creating one might help protect the huge identity the dollar has in the market.
The Board also explicitly mentioned that a CBDC is a cautious and most protected asset in the digital market, “with no associated credit or liquidity risks.”
In the same report, the Board detailed four factors fundamental to establishing a U.S. CBDC:
The Board stated that a system intermediated by private organizations would provide opportunities to leverage the currently existing processes and privacy protection rules that the private ventures have . This could also pose advantages from the private businesses’ capabilities in terms of innovations and reduce major disrupting impacts to the current U.S. banking.
Federal Reserve Board mentions in their report:
“As such, it could provide a safe foundation for private-sector innovations to meet current and future demands for payment services. All options for private digital money, including stablecoins and other cryptocurrencies, require mechanisms to reduce liquidity risk and credit risk. But all these mechanisms are imperfect.”
Although a CBDC might look just like a digital form of a nation’s fiat currency, the impact it’s establishment could have is much more complicated, contingent on its form.
The Board described CBDC as the best replacement for commercial currencies, and this substitution poses benefits in the banking market. Creating a CBDC could help expand banking financial reserves by bringing down aggregate banking deposits, and consequently reduce liability risks for consumers. The Board also pointed out in its paper that a form of CBDC with interest payments could raise demand from the public.
The paper made it clear that the Board do believe that CBDCs are most probably the safest digital asset and could potentially be a safety net during financial crises.
According to the paper:
“The ability to quickly convert other forms of money — including deposits at commercial banks — into CBDC could make runs on financial firms more likely or more severe.”
Currently, the usual public alternative to insurances and other traditional services in times of financial stress are stablecoins. The Board believes that in its existence, a CBDC would be a more attractive refuge.
Crypto stands still and it is here to stay. However, we have a problem. Compliance is not only the tip of the iceberg, but rather a whole new one we are yet to break-off.
Throughout the years, the crypto market and how we view it had immensely evolved. Now, it is no longer perceived as some mysterious thing from the dark corners of the web. It’s a complicated thing that we have been able to accept and understand better, trying to come to grips with what it is and how it works – and we are continuing to do so.
The rapidly evolving nature of blockchain has shown great opportunities and potential in changing the financial market. However, the anonymity it provides had also shown the inherent potential of being abused by criminals for various scams and money laundering schemes. This and its popularity in the global market have caused scrutiny from the authorities.
By its very nature, cryptocurrencies are freewheeling, unrestrained from currently existing regulations, posing a problem to authorities who are used to well-defined assets, with clear-cut rules. This is the exact same reason why compliance has been, and still remains, a huge challenge for crypto users and operators.
In terms of regulations and compliance, there had been cases in the past which forced government agencies to take action.
Just last 2021, the Justice Department and IRS (Internal Revenue Service) of the U.S. investigated Binance, the largest cryptocurrency exchange platform. This is due to some reports of a potential money laundering s which had also been a concern by policymakers from Japan, the United Kingdom, and Germany.
Recently, the crypto trading platform BitMEX was prosecuted by U.S. courts for claiming that they will be prohibiting American citizens to trade, but allegedly doing the opposite.
These evidently show that we have a problem and so far, the picture is not looking good.
Compliance is a challenge crypto must face one way or another, the sooner, the better.
The digital market has never stood still. It constantly presents new forms of crypto-related assets constituting to a big part of the problem – a sundry of transactions to regulate. And as unbeholden and borderless the cryptocurrencies are, assets and transactions to regulate, and regulations itself, can come from different horizons.
For example, the need to comply with state sanctions creates unproportionate rules across the global market. The U.S. had provided specific controls over digital transactions in Iran and Cuba, forcing Binance to ensure the deactivation of accounts from these countries.
There’s also ConsenSys Academy which banned over 50 Iranian users from the platform, in the fear of legal sanctions from the government.
Now, what should the regulators do in facing this challenge?
In order to minimize the size of the issue, the authorities should try to shift their focus away from regulating decentralized and on-chain applications and concentrate on more centralized transactions. Trying to impose regulations on decentralized applications will most likely be nothing but a waste of time, given that these often provide new alternatives.
By applying more rules to fund owners from centralized businesses, we can ensure better integrity for the market, protection for investors, and provide other safeguards essential in ensuring AML (Anti Money laundering).
But does this does not mean that we should completely abandon retail investors out? Rather, concentrating on centralized protocols and exchanges would likely help avoid market manipulation by huge businesses, which would prevent abuse to retail investors.
According to the CoinDesk, “The Travel Rule means that providers of virtual assets need to collect and share customer data for transactions over a certain threshold. It simply means crypto providers must stick to international rules that ensure the protection of legitimate finance and prevent illicit finance.”
In the U.S crypto market, the Travel Rule was used by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) by creating a threshold that once reached, a compulsory collection of information for any international transaction is being imposed, as well as a retention for related transfer of information. This is an attempt by the FATF to prevent the public from choosing the most favorable international compliance rules.
Banking firms were the only ones previously involved in the Travel Rule. But back in 2019, the FATF applied the same to crypto organizations, together with their local rules intended for AML.
With the current FATF regulations, the threshold applied is USD 1,000 for transfers involving the U.S. However, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) have recently brought forward a proposal, adjusting the threshold to just USD 250. This creates a new problem for crypto users.
However, it is very much ideal to fully implement the Rule. Realistically, it would be difficult to determine a definite travel system that would perfectly satisfy the market. Aside from this, there is also the issue of anonymity in the blockchain, presenting a challenge on identifying exact owners and addresses involved in the blockchain.
One primary problem that most crypto businesses face in terms of compliance is the lack of proper customer verification. This makes them more at risk for scams and abuse, facing fake IDs, documentation, and leaked databases.
With a little bit of research, you will see fake accounts being sold at USD 1 on the internet. There are also verified IDs accessible for only USD 300 coming from intercepted databases. More high-end schemes involve seizing information using Deepfakes and unsecured browsers.
These are just a few examples of the overall picture of the problem the crypto market has. There are more sophisticated attacks out there, where users are directly routing themselves to the traps, creating more complicated issues for the industry.
These issues are also expected to strike banking firms that have been recently entering the crypto landscape. Recent studies have shown that banks devote around 4 to 6 % of their revenues to ensure compliance. However, around 10% of these banks lack proper customer verification process, risking insufficient data protection.
Paul Brody of Ernst & Young Global recently said: “The only way that blockchains will deliver upon their true promise to the world is if public blockchain networks are the preferred path for enterprises and investors.”
However, the crypto industry must work on ensuring protection and market integrity. Compliance is a huge challenge ahead of us. There is no way for us but to confront and deal with it head-on. Postponing the much-needed confrontation and overlooking the problems will just lead us to much more complicated challenges down the road.
In the traditional landscape, financial firms are mostly unenthusiastic in scrapping off their profit margin to deal with compliance. Businesses are mostly reluctant and tend to underinvest when it comes to ensuring proper regulations. However, investing as early as possible would likely save us from more issues that could snowball in time
Compliance problems have been here since the birth of the crypto industry. It is a challenge we must solve as soon as possible, or else, more damage might strike us that will be too late to cope with.
We in COREDO provide crypto compliance consultation and services. Reach us through the below link so we can help you.
Central banks have been the heart of financial systems since the very beginning. They use a variety of strategies to achieve their countries’ mandates, which we call monetary policies. These banks control the money supply and interest rates, and their actions greatly impact imports, exports, and local and foreign investments.
However, take note that central banks operate with intermediaries and physical offices which require additional fees for its users and salary expenses for the employers, respectively.
Now, cryptocurrency barged in and introduced itself as an alternative to central banks in terms of economic and technological functions. In the case of its top coin, bitcoin (BTC), it allows users to make payments without third-party involvement.
Instead, through “peer-to-peer” transactions, only. This concept gave an upper hand to bitcoin versus central banks as it solves three problems traditional banks are facing:
As BTC poses threat to the financial systems used for decades, several institutions and individuals tried to sabotage bitcoin by naming it a Ponzi scheme, fraud, or an accomplice of criminals and terrorists.
There are also criticisms raised for it being improperly regulated, illegitimate, and anonymous. Further, bitcoin’s standard legal status is still unidentified across the globe and only a few nations recognize bitcoin as a legal tender.
One of the examples was when the Chief Executive Officer of J.P. Morgan Chase, James Dimon, called bitcoin a “fraud” in September 2017. However, even with their efforts to destroy bitcoin, they had no choice but to go with the emerging industry.
As such, J.P. Morgan is now considered as the first bank to offer metaverse, presenting a virtual image of their CEO, Mr. Dimon, in their company’s lounge.
Other banking institutions are now also trying to catch up with the crypto industry and hoping to gain from it. Why? Simple – crypto is what customers want.
We are at a time when the financial system is longed to be defined. As mentioned earlier, central banks have been the heart of this system. With these banks, payments and the creation of credits have been easy, and without it, monetary transactions could be in chaos.
However, for the past ten years, one cannot deny the fact that even if these traditional institutions tried to block the emergence of technological improvements, the financial revolution still occurred. That is in the case of bitcoin and other virtual trading systems such as “peer-to-peer” lending, crowd-sourced investments, and other financial system innovations.
This brought about the struggle for the banks since they now have zero option but to go with the booming crypto industry and get out of their bubble.
The concept of banking is that money coming from the deposits of clients is then invested in a loaning program for other customers. They manage the cash flow by working with their countries’ governments. A classic example of intermediaries.
The good thing about bitcoin is that it does not operate with intermediaries. Cryptocurrencies such as BTC work by allowing an individual or a company to trade straightforwardly.
This left the banks currently with no choice but to sprint with the fast-pacing innovations and are even trying to convince regulators to decelerate the crypto industry to make way for laws that would be to their advantage.
Going back to J.P. Morgan, they released a report that there are as many as three hundred banks that will enable clients to trade BTC through mobile applications starting quarters one and two of the current year.
In addition, a Manhattan-based newspaper company that focuses on financial services, American Banker, conducted a survey and showed that forty-four percent of traditional banks will be offering cryptocurrency services before 2023 starts.
Another multinational financial company, Visa, started to provide crypto consulting services in 2021. They also launched a series of apps that offers BTC support to banking institutions.
Mastercard, on the other hand, is now lending a hand to banks in terms of navigation of virtual currencies. This includes basic education for beginners, evaluation of potential risks, and cryptocurrency and non-fungible token strategies.
NYDG, a bitcoin company that is a subsidiary of USD 10B-worth NY-based fund manager, Stone Ridge, collaborated with a big financial tech company, FIS. Their goal is to allow banks in the United States to start offering BTC months from now. Right now, hundreds of banks already signed up for the program.
Simultaneously, more and more banks across the globe are investing in crypto and blockchain technology. To back this claim up, thirteen of the biggest banks in the world have investments amounting to about USD 3B in the said industry.
As per a study conducted by Blockdata, you may find through the below the top investors in crypto companies and their number of investments:
Another research from Cornerstone Advisors suggests that sixty percent of cryptocurrency holders prefer to utilize banks in investing in crypto. Some thirty-two percent said that they may do the same, and four percent claimed that they would not use banks in crypto investments.
If you are going to investigate the regulations side, there is good news as well. United States President Joe Biden signed an executive order to further examine the risks and advantages of cryptocurrencies. This made banks become more at ease with the said virtual financial platform.
Now, traditional banks indeed do not have a choice. Right now, all they have is the trust of customers. Technology is not on their side. They need to catch up with these technological innovations in the financial sector and be competitive. Otherwise, they will be swallowed by the waves of cryptocurrency.
Need more crypto advice? Connect with us at Coredo.
In cryptocurrency, there is a variety of coins to be traded. One of those is bitcoin (BTC). Bitcoin enthusiasts often acquire them through mining. It is the process of producing new bitcoin by solving mathematical puzzles. More specifically, computers are equipped with specialized microchips where the puzzles are loaded. Miners are then rewarded with bitcoin once these puzzles are solved.
Since the process depends on electricity, it is harmful to the environment if the source of energy is fossil fuels. Hence, it is highly encouraged to perform bitcoin mining in countries where there are renewable energy sources to reduce its negative impact in the environment which may contribute to climate change.
The Nordic region is considered to be one of the best places to mine bitcoin. This is because they already use renewable energy sources.
In fact, the majority of the top countries for bitcoin mining are in this region. Further, there are no current restrictions or bans on cryptocurrency mining. Hence, a “Bitcoin’s green haven” indeed.
Now, let us introduce to you a company from the Nordic region which brings together several institutions to provide payments innovation – NextGen Nordics. Their program includes central and banking communities, and both public and private trading beneficiaries to technologically improve payment systems in the Nordic region.
They planned to have a conference on the 27th of April of the current year and you may register through this link.
In line with this, let us give you some top news from the region.
Having been supporting the green movement, Sweden expanded its crypto industry to be on the same track. A Swedish company, Genesis Digital Assets just publicized that it will launch its newest bitcoin mining system in 2024. The private industrial-scale bitcoin miner claimed that the new mining process is self-hosted and is expected to have a 100-megawatt of power capacity. Further, the power to be used will come from 100 percent clean energy resources. Statistically, 54.5 percent is from hydroelectricity, 42.8 from nuclear, and 2.7 from wind energy. You may read more from here.
Neobanks are financial technology companies that provide internet-only financial services. They usually lack physical branches which traditional fintech companies have.
One of the neobanks in Denmark is Lunar. They claimed to offer the country’s lowest priced business account which has an all-in functionality.
Now, this bank increased its capital by up to EUR 70 million while preparing for the roll out of its new trading system and Business-to-Business payment solutions. The whole financing process is an addition to the bank’s EUR 210 million fund in 2021. Lunar, now, has gained a total of EUR 345 million and reached almost EUR 2 billion in valuation.
As per their Chief Executive Officer, Ken Villium, the garnered funds will empower them to keep up the pace in their expansion in the Nordic region.
In detail, they even started a new Nordic platform for crypto at the beginning of 2022 which made their business partners accept and trace card payments through the web. This new offer will allow their users to exchange and liquidate crypto coins like ETH, ADA, DOT, and DOGE via Lunar app.
They are also expecting to have mergers and acquisitions ventures for their Nordic customers.
On the 10th of March 2022, the multinational financial company, Visa, announced that they have already acquired Tink.
The acquired company is a European open banking institution that enables financial firms, financial technologies, and traders to create financial goods and services, and transfer money.
Before its acquisition, Tink is already working with over 3400 banks and other financial firms in Europe. Now that the acquisition has been completed, it is expected for the users to deliver significant benefits in controlling their financial experiences which include management of their money, data, and goals.
According to Visa Europe’s Chief Executive Officer, Charlotte Hogg, as virtual instruments are now the new heart of the economy, this acquisition will greatly empower financial systems as it will bring forth a better choice and quality for the clients.
On the other hand, Tink’s Chief Executive Officer and cofounder emphasized that Visa would provide them with an increased connection to another 15000 financial companies, and they could also make use of Visa’s reputable image to further improve the financial sector in Europe, and even across the globe.
Though Tink has already been acquired, it will still operate independently in the near future having its current management continue with the organization’s leadership.
Check this link for more information.
A Danish fintech company, Cardlay, has just secured an investment worth USD 6M or DKK 40M. In context, Cardlay offers financial solutions to enable and serve banking and other financial institutions. They intend to provide an easy spending process through their advanced and smart commercial payments system.
Cardlay received its fund from the existing investors they have and is planning to allocate it in further developing their commercial payments solutions, connect with another international bank, and serve an order for a German client.
Further, the financial company also publicized that it would appoint its new Information Technology director, which is Morten Christensen, a previous employee of BankData and Energinet, and the recipient of 2019 European Chief Information Officer of the Year.
Another Danish company which specializes in smart cards and automated expense reports, Pleo, welcomes it new Chief People Officer (CPO) – Mette Hindborg Gade.
Before joining her new company, Mette worked at McKinsey and Company as an Associate Partner. She has a background in engineering and a professional in leadership and problem solving. Gade has also been working with Pleo to help build, start, launch the smart company’s new process unit.
This innovation will allow the company to move into fifteen more markets, recruit more than 500 employees across the globe, and improve career growth and inclusion for its current employees, all before 2023 starts.
JPMorgan launches its own virtual world in the metaverse, predicting huge market opportunity in virtual gaming and virtual real estate properties.
Marking as the pioneering bank to set foot in the metaverse, JP Morgan had officially opened its own “lounge” in Decentraland, currently one of the most popular blockchain-based virtual reality gaming platforms. This makes JPMorgan the first banking firm to get involved in the metaverse, as it eyes on huge market opportunities.
The metaverse, is a 3D virtual world that features content for social interaction among its users in augmented reality. Currently, arguably the largest augmented reality platform in the market is Decentraland, which is built on top of the Ethereum blockchain. Decentraland allows its users to experience and monetize in-game content while exploring its virtual world.
JPMorgans’ own space in Decentraland is named Onyx, which features a virtual shopping district called Metaiuku, copied from Harajuku District in Japan. Upon entering Onyx, users are greeted by a tiger that wanders around, with a picture of Jamie Dimon, the Chief Executive Officer of JPMorgan. The lounge also currently features videos about the banks’ achievements in the blockchain space and talks about fintech and crypto market.
Upon launching Onyx, JPMorgan had expressed how they see “limitless” opportunities and huge market potential that the metaverse presents. The bank’s perception of this 3D augmented reality focuses on how the economy of metaverse offers potential opportunities in various areas and how the dynamics of the offered supply and demanded products drives the people into the market.
Based on the bank’s previous press release, they currently see around US$1 trillion of annual gains in the metaverse. There’s currently no doubt on this given how the virtual and digital market has skyrocketed over the last year.
The Sandbox and its rival, Decentraland, two of the biggest virtual reality platforms, reported almost $500 million of sales for around 90 thousand virtual item transactions in 2021. Second Life, an online metaverse gaming platform, reported roughly $700 million in GDP for the past year.
Currently, NFTs offer a $41 billion market cap. In recent months, six of the biggest virtual platform brought over $160 million of sales on Opensea, one of the biggest NFT trading platforms.
See also: Opensea, biggest NFT market place
Although prices for metaverse properties have skyrocketed over the past year, price is only one factor contributing to the spotlight on metaverse. There’s also the various potential to commercialize virtual properties in gaming, content creation, and other ventures.
With its recent entrance into the space of metaverse, JPMorgan aims to be one of the pioneers in the market by industrializing its own brand in the economy.
As mentioned in the metaverse statement released by JPMorgan, the firm is ready to traverse the various rooms that the metaverse pose. The bank ensures that the success they will aim to build will be highly contingent on establishing a well-built financial system that allows flexibility to the people in interacting via the 3D digital reality.
The bank mentioned that it’s eyeing to enable a gaming environment that will mirror the global financial economy. They intend to institutionalize a digital landscape with its own in-game items, payment methods, and digital assets, which users can commercialize and monetize. Given its global high-standard banking ecosystem, JPMorgan believes that this is a huge opportunity for them to initiate the same in the metaverse.
Virtual property ownership is also one key opportunity area that JPMorgan seeks to enter. This is in line with the recent rise of virtual real estate prices in the market. Just in six months last 2021, prices for virtual lands skyrocketed, amounting to $12,000 in the month of June.
JPMorgan believes that virtual property ownership would be a profitable area on their end since they have already developed a competitive stance on real-world real estate lending. The bank envisions a virtual real-estate market that will mirror the banking ecosystem and services provided in the real world, such as lending, rents, mortgages, and credits.
However, some financial analysts believe that the Metaverse will require a different type of banking ecosystem and that the current financial foundations might not be as functional in the metaverse economy.
Even though JPMorgan had been the pioneering bank to mark its existence in the virtual space, there were multiple investor giants who have already foresees the virtual space as a potential trillion-dollar venture.
The rival global banks and investment services companies Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley had previously acknowledged the potential of the virtual world. Goldman Sachs believes that the meta-economy poses a global market opportunity with potential gains of $8 trillion, while Morgan Stanley only sees it as a huge investment in China.
Last 2021, Cathie Wood of Ark Invest mentioned that the metaverse will eventually enter different sections of the economy, going beyond the current gaming and virtual property areas. She believes that with its limitless potential, metaverse could be a multi-trillion opportunity.
Grayscale, one of the largest crypto and digital currency investing companies, mentioned in a press release that it foresees more than $1 trillion dollars annual sales for the meta-economy given the potential of blockchains in the digital world.
Multiple bank analysts have also noted that the metaverse market could reach $4 trillion in China alone as it provides a more interactive platform to the public but could go higher than $8 trillion once investors have explored different opportunities like education and real-estate ownership.
Given the huge opportunity it poses, it is expected by most that more banks and investors will probably join the metaverse within the next years.
Are you interested to learn more about metaverse? We have experts that can help you!
In any business, the basic rule is simple – how you provide your service dictates how satisfied the customers would be. Is the transaction fast? Are the requirements easy to acquire? Or the is process too complex?
In the current financial market, many companies have already transitioned their processes to a more modernized and digitized way to better cater their customers.
Applying for a bank loan? Of course, you would expect to know whether it was approved or not immediately.
Getting a new credit card? You would want to receive updates in real-time.
Financial companies are now expected to provide every detail in the palm of your hand – transaction records, purchase statuses, and historical summaries should be instantly accessible.
Most financial transactions are now digital for customers, but the supporting procedures pose vast room for optimization. The underlying processes involved in these transactions are usually still manual which are most likely negatively impact the end-to-end experience of the consumers.
This exact thing is the ultimate challenge for most companies who have relied on traditional practices and are now trying to evolve their processes. It involves great pressure created by the demand for a more digital experience in order to compete.
To be able to keep pace in the competition, financial institutions should take a look into the “paradox” of modernizing their rigid traditional processes.
Since the birth of FinTech, the market has rapidly transitioned to digitalized processes in providing services to the consumers. This caused over-the-roof expectations from the public when it comes to financial services. At the forefront, you can say that these digital solutions are seamless.
However, the underlying steps and procedures involved are still, in most cases, manual.
For most complex processes, there are most likely supporting procedures that are being manually completed at the back end. These pose a disjointed end-to-end user experience leading to customer dissatisfaction.
Normally, companies rely on technology solutions when it comes to process improvements. This commonly involved automation which include applications that are supposed to manage data and step-by-step processes from a manual to a digital form.
These type of streamlining come as project initiatives with a team as oversight to the overall transition, matching and mapping, lots of testing and loads of meetings, just to improve a single process. These, of course, usually require resources and huge efforts.
You might think that these kinds of projects should greatly lessen manual tasks and the overall workforce needed. However, it’s the opposite that usually happens. In most cases, tool improvements have led to an increase in the human workforce.
Humans are usually not eliminated, but rather, given new tasks that relate to the connection of the manual and digital procedures. These tasks usually include compliance checks and are usually more complex, hence, need more staff. One example of this is the bank giant ABN Amro which has previously shown a great increase in its compliance workforce. In 2013, they have around 1,000 staffs. Come 2019, the number skyrocketed by thrice of this.
It is undeniable that digital automation give companies the opportunity to re-engineer their processes, with the aim of providing much smoother services to the customers.
However, if not done right, digitalization could be a double-edged sword. Aside from the fact that it would most likely increase cost, manual complex processes could also lead to an increase in waiting time and longer retention, leading to unsatisfied customers.
To ensure that a process change would likely provide benefits to the company and drive customer satisfaction, businesses should start with a thorough assessment of all manual steps involved in a specific process. With this, it could be determined whether that certain process could potentially be transformed to drive a positive impact.
The first thing you can consider is to assess whether that specific activity could be completely removed. Take a look into its essence and identify if it is really necessary or is it something you can streamline or better, eliminate.
If not, further analyze and ask the question, is it something that can be automated?
There are many existing technologies that do not require advanced knowledge in programming. You can leverage no-code applications involving machine learning and data processing that once developed, do not need any manual intervention.
With these no-code platforms, you can instil technical capabilities to your staff even though they do not have a great foundation in IT. This could potentially lead to creating a work environment that highly promotes and values digitization.
By performing proper examinations to the company’s day-to-day practices, businesses would be able to transform complex tasks and procedures into highly efficient processes.
Appropriate streamlining and automation could help break the potential of digital processes in creating unsatisfactory services, and instead provide a better end-to-end user experience.
Created in 2009, Bitcoin (BTC) is a digital currency operating through peer-to-peer technology. Unlike the traditional currencies we know, it does not rely on bank or government operations, but instead, on cryptography.
To those who are interested in the convenience of transacting through the internet, BTC is a big help since it was designed with the ambition of being an alternative to the existing remittance systems we currently have. Even better, it is free from central control but functions as fine as traditional currencies.
More than a decade passed, and bitcoin has now become one of the top financial assets the public considers. However, there have been multiple criticisms with regard to the crypto coin. These include the virtual currency’s regulations, safety, and anonymity.
In this article, our goal is to focus on the issue of BTC being referred to as “anonymous”. Meaning, can criminals use it for their advantage?
Well, let us tell you right now. The answer is no, they are not anonymous. The law can trace bitcoin and illegal activities can’t be covered.
There are many cases involving bitcoin. There are hacking situations, fraudulent acts, and illegal use of bitcoins in private institutions, including on and offline transactions. Let us focus on one of the top cases in the field.
In the Republic of Korea (ROK), there is a man named Jong Woo Son. He runs the largest child porn site ever caught by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, “Welcome to Video”. The law enforcers raided Son’s house and saw 250000 tape recordings as evidence. He was then declared guilty in 2019 and will also be indicted in the United States should he flee into the country.
How did the Federal know about this case in the first place? Well, because of bitcoin. With its blockchain, the criminal had profits coming from as much as one million bitcoin locations. Take note that each virtual address or location is unique. Now, since the blockchain is transparent to each user, the enforcers bought and sent the payment to the porn site’s crypto wallet.
They, then, traced to which crypto trading platform it was transferred to and for the record, it was Coinbase. On this platform, Mr. Son was forced to comply with anti-money laundering control by providing his self-identification credentials.
We mentioned earlier that bitcoin is not anonymous. Instead, it is something that rhymes with said word – pseudonymous. What is a pseudonym? It refers to someone or something that uses a fake or fictitious name, a disguise we may say.
This gave an upper hand to the authorities in tracing bitcoin. How? It is via the two different key codes a single BTC has – public and private.
For a background, public code refers to crypto being identified on a blockchain. The latter refers to those who have the necessity to transfer crypto from one virtual pocket to a second one.
This 2-key code structure made the online payment process possible for every digital coin by allowing them to be sent straightforwardly without any intervention from financial companies or banks. Meaning, the process cuts off the 3rd party involvement from a transaction, only relying on the two main parties who sends and receives the payment. Therefore, this does not involve any trust to both parties as every transaction is recorded on a blockchain.
Having this concept being publicly known prevents double-spending — which is a scheme where an individual uses a single cryptocurrency more than once. Hence, its anonymity is indeed not true since the crypto coin can be traced from when and where it was acquired until when it will be transferred.
The problem is that its owner will still not be disclosed during the tracing. It will be, though, when a person’s identification credentials will be required through a privatized key code. The said code is for one-time use only and will be burned once used. After so, a current one will be released when the new owner receives it. Thus, both people in the trade will not have any idea of who sent it or received it, but there will still be evidence that a cryptocurrency settlement has been done due to the blockchain.
We said that the owners are not disclosed, rather, they are covered by the publicized key codes that are accompanied by privatized ones- a pseudonym it is.
However, it is also worth noting that though there are private key codes, they are different from rightful or legally recognized owners.
Nevertheless, several cryptocurrency holders get away with this. For example, Monero is a private cryptocurrency company that is considered to be the best at hiding transactions. The secret is that they mix business solutions and split the arrangement string by sending BTCs from a certain class of separate holders and then trading them in a random sequence.
Cryptocurrency tokens such as BTCs are convertible to cash. However, remember that the process involves taxation and of course, a 3rd party broker. To explain this clearly, the 3rd party will act as the intermediary between the exchange of your coin and the money to be sent to your bank account. These 3rd party vendors require identification proof before an individual can withdraw and it usually takes two to three business days to process the request.
Take note that this meticulous requirement got the trust of experts of the field because of its safe and reliable fund security.
This made it possible for the criminal we mentioned earlier to be caught. The Korean criminal got out of his hiding when he intended to cash out his acquired bitcoins.
Another case where bitcoin is involved is of the couple Heather and Ilya Lichtenstein. They were caught when they tried to checkout a USD 500 worth Walmart card via cryptocurrency. Based on the investigation, they plundered USD 4.5B of crypto from Bitfinex trading in the year 2016 and were taken into custody on February 8th of the current year.
We can also look into another case where a person was tracked down since he used an e-mail address that is connected to a virtual wallet.
See how the law enforcers took bitcoin as their trump card? Online trading may be possible with crypto, but it is difficult to use it illegally in our society without intervention from a 3rd party. This is because there is a thing called “Know-Your-Customer” which requires people to submit their identification credentials to those licensed money transfer institutions.
The only way to skip the legal process is by letting your money be handled by criminals.
Studies in tracing illegal blockchain activities are not yet done. In fact, it is just starting. Experts and regulators are highly invested in how the industry works – from small details to general information. Patterns are also being observed to solve the puzzle of its complexity.
The good thing is, they are now identifying the hacks and secrets of crypto, even before platform designers and hackers do.
Have you ever thought about why Decentralized Finance (DeFi) emerged quickly in the financial technology world? Well, let us explain to you what the hype is all about.
First off, let’s get to know Decentralized Finance or DeFi per se. DeFi is a system that provides financial services without the need for intermediaries.
For better understanding let’s look at its opposite, Centralized Finance. In Centralized Finance, your money is within the banks or institutions, and hence, the control is theirs. For example, you purchased a bag using your credit card. It will be charged from the seller to your bank, and will then be forwarded for payment.
The difference is that, in DeFi, asset and business owners are allowed to control their own transactions using the said technology. It promises that it can do almost all the things a normal financial institution can do, but even better. They claimed that since intermediaries and normal paper works are no longer needed, the transactions within DeFi are also faster.
The way it works is through a computerized peer-to-peer ecosystem, which does not have any barrier and is open to all. Meaning, it is like a digital option to brokerages and venture banks such as Wall Street or the City of London, but since it is digitized, there are no added costs for office spaces and employee salaries.
With all these benefits of DeFi, its Total Value Locked (TVL) blew up from USD700 million to about USD20 billion in a period of only one year and is currently assessed to be as much as $200 billion based on this link.
In fact, DeFi’s first project, Maker, has been a topnotcher with regards to TVL of ether among all DeFi systems ever since it started. For a little background, it is a permissionless loaning platform that created DAI, the very first Ethereum-based decentralized stable coin.
This emerging system definitely keeps drawing people and other financial institutions to even consider DeFi products as a form of exchange. To back this claim up, the United States (US) has just announced that stable coins will be offered as income returned on the users’ investments.
According to Dexalot’s COO, Tim Shan, three major enterprises namely State Street Corporation, Fidelity Investments Inc, and BNY Mellon, have now put their money into the digital currency industry and started offering services of the same.
State Street. This $40 trillion-worth custody bank already began to have crypto-based services as its investment approach to their private-reserve clients by launching their digital division for the past year.
As per Shan, even the most traditional Repurchase Agreement (Repo) markets started to lend on bitcoin, from their usual transactions using treasuries, securities, and bonds.
Though DeFi started with its goal of only having services like loaning and to be used in a proof-of-stake process, others are optimistic about its progress.
James Taylor, the Chief Business Officer of Unizen, a line that caters to both central exchange and decentralized trading, emphasized that DeFi is undoubtedly drawing businesses since it presents improved credit risk management and higher return of investment than the usual bonds, and therefore gives more confidence to the clients.
Global regulators are now more engrossed in this financial technology due to its fast-paced progress. It has been emphasized by the Chairman of United States (US) SEC and former investment banker, Gary Gensler, that DeFi isn’t exempted from surveillance. More so, it is worth noting that one of the main concerns is its legal organization type.
Filling in the spot of the business’ regulatory system, United States’ Congress has formed a paradigm to regulate it in the country. The said framework consists of specified roles for its different agencies.
As for the global framework of cryptocurrency and computerized assets, the ex-chief of BIS Innovation Hub, Benoît Cœuré, spilled that talks about the issue have intensified because of the emerging DeFi industry.
In addition, UDHC’s Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Steven Becker, compared DeFi to oceans. In his view, even though you can’t control oceans, you can still control ports and shipping systems. Hence, the company’s main point of business is now on decentralized finance with regard to government laws.
Educational development, and operation and user-friendly approach. These are the suggestions of a governing body at HyperDex, Stefano Jeantet. Jenatet claimed that developers must break the information barrier and thrive to have an operation that is less intimidating for customary investors.
In conclusion, more input from regulators must be obtained in order for the public money (i.e. pensions, taxes, etc.) to be funded in DeFi freely.
Several institutions have answered questions thrown at the industry. First is VALK. This end-to-end digital transaction platform in United Kingdom (UK) is included in UK’s Financial Conduct Authority’s regulatory sandbox. This allows them to have goods and service testing in an environment with controlled parameters.
VALK created a digital wallet that authorizes companies to be in charge of their DeFi fund on a single environment using one account. This is called Merlin. It is one of those programs that is indeed an answer to the flourishing DeFi system.
Another one is from Aave. This $12 billion worth of TVL enterprise has introduced “flash loans”. It is one of their flagship products that allows clients to get loans without collateral, the first in the said financial industry.
According to VALK’s study, DeFi holds 30% of the investment in the global market and is anticipated to add 39% further in the next six months.
However, it was also identified that investors are worried on the regulation side, which is about 54%, and 52% on being secured.
As a whole, 84% of the participants are still waiting for the regulatory system to be improved in 3 years, and 12% for the bank-related aspects.
Antoine Loth of VALK and Mr. B. Mahoney of Alkemi, a liquidity network company, have the same perspectives. They expressed that since DeFi is quickly emerging, it must be transparent and liquid, just as what financiers are looking for.
It was found out through VALK’s research that 69% of funders are into DeFi through web browsers as their digital wallets, 48% through tangible ones, and about 43% through custodians. On the other hand, 27% of them are into privacy-preserving computation, and 83% are on merging-based programs.
In conclusion, decentralized finance (DeFi) has really evolved rapidly, but its journey is still long. One cannot say yet that it is already a replacement to the traditional institutions we have in the financial world.
Got questions about this article? We have experts at Coredo who are more than glad to assist you.
Diving in with the NFT craze this year? Here’s the top 5 NFT projects that are best for your investments.
Have you ever heard of NFTs? Who am I kidding, of course you have. Over the years, cryptocurrency has immensely changed our view of finance and investments. Its unprecedented rise in the market shocked economies, to the point that it’s difficult not to know or at least hear about it, for which NFT is not an exception.
Non-fungible tokens, or NFTs, can be anything. It can be a photo, an art collection, audio or an in-game item and it has been paving the way for blockchain adaptation through the years. Based on a study made by nonfungibletoken.com, spending on NFTs last month of May 2021 amounted to over $75 million. As you might have guessed, only an upward trajectory is expected in the following years. Given its natural adaptability and capacity to evolve, the limit is out of the horizon, and only growth is anticipated.
Currently, a variety of NFTs are on their way to stardom. These have differing types of projects, platforms, and concepts per se. They differ depending on what specific blockchain is involved, markets and areas they target to capture, and even the type of NFT or “products” involved. It can be in a form of digital arts you might want to collect, or short videos that excite you.
Given NFTs’ current popularity in the market, we know that you might want to broaden your knowledge and most probably invest in such. If so, you may want to check below top 5 NFT projects that we think is best for your investment.
Top on the list is one of the most popular and more unique NFT projects in the current mainstream market – CryptoPunks. CryptoPunks is a collection of pixilated digital arts being monetized as non-fungible tokens (NFTs) living under the ETH (Ethereum) blockchain. It has been one of the pioneers in this concept since its first rise in 2017, and currently, there are over 10,000 “punks” collectables available in the market.
The idea was inspired in the age of the English punk scene, featuring various forms. Some are monkey-like, human, alien, with different features making each punk unique and cannot be replicated. These NFT collectibles being crazed with all over the internet is available in two of the biggest NFT platforms, Larva Labs and OpenSea.
Same with other NFT collectibles, CryptoPunks are usually utilized as investments that can be bought and sold, with its own risks and benefits. Although there‘s no guarantee for future returns, being backed by a huge community is a solid reason to believe that these are of great value as investment assets. As of writing, the most expensive cryptopunk collectable ever sold amounted to $11 million.
Twitter Account: @larvalabs
Read More: https://nftnow.com/guides/cryptopunks-guide/
BORED APE YACHT CLUB (BAYC)
If you have spent a specific amount of time watching TV or browsing Twitter, you have most probably seen a Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) NFT. Many famous celebrities, such as Jimmy Fallon, Eminem and Stephen Curry, have already joined the hype for this. Bored Ape Yacht Club, also an NFT project inheriting from Ethereum blockchain with punk-related concepts, have been successful through the years from an internet sensation turning to an influential NFT brand.
Same with CyptoPunks, each “apes” has different items building its rarity. Currently, there are only a total of 10,000 apes existing in the market, in which the highest selling item went for almost $3 million. This limited supply might be perceived as a disadvantage to make investors back out, however, given the popularity, the large community it had developed, and a number of celebrities and brands joining the craze, that fixed supply could be anticipated as more valuable and profitable.
MUTANT APE YACHT CLUB (MAYC)
As you might have guessed from the name itself, this one is basically a “mutated” spin-off of Bored Ape Yacht Club. Mutant Ape Yacht Club (MAYC), which started as a project to support investors who could not afford BAYC NFTs, is also now a huge hit among investors and mimicking the success of its “forefather”.
Mutant Ape Yacht Club’s success propelled through the months of year 2021, and now consists of 20,000 mutated apes. This project basically introduces an entirely different NFT collection which is exclusively available for traders at OpenSea. Anticipation and continuous success are deliberately expected by the market as more and more brands and celebrities get involved in this project.
Read More: https://www.finder.com/mutant-ape-yacht-club
See also: Opensea, biggest NFT market place
Cool Cats, also a take on digital arts concept of NFT, has considerably grown ever since its drop last July 2021. One can say that it launched on a perfect timing, taking advantage on the early rise of Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC). Cool Cats is also built on-top of Ethereum blockchain, which consists of cat-like collection of 9,999 NFTs. These collections feature unique traits in each cat, with various items, outfits, and color, some making the cat rare.
One main reason why Cool Cats have remained on top is due to the various perks that the project provides to its owners. It claims to give back at least 20% of ETH raised in the market to the community via airdrops. Investors have chosen to hold their cool cat NFTs due to the occasional contests and giveaways the project has.
However, since it hit the market, there has been a considerable decrease in prices. But don’t worry, there are still various reasons to believe that Cool Cats could continue to grow given the solid community of holders it has created. There are also many celebrities and prominent collectors getting involved in the craze.
Read More: https://nftnow.com/guides/cool-cats-guide/
Aside from the realm of digital arts, one of the best use cases of NFTs is in online gaming. This concept has provided to have huge growth capabilities and has been in the mainstream market over the years. One of the first blockchain-based games to pioneer this field is Decentraland.
Decentraland, powered by Ethereum blockchain, is a virtual reality (VR) gaming platform which allows users to experience and monetize in-game items and contents. It is perhaps one of the most popular NFT games in the virtual land platforms. In this game, you can buy and sell 3D land within its virtual reality universe, in which you can control with your own creativity.
Owning a land will allow you to build all sorts of things such as galleries, arenas, or whatever you desire, which you can explore and create content with.
Interested to learn more about NFTs? Let our team in COREDO help you! We have blockchain experts ready to assist you!
Have you ever thought of how blockchains can directly connect with each other? Like, how can they operate to vitally enable crypto owners to exchange their data and multiple cryptocurrencies without compromising the time and cost for the said trade?
The answer? Bridge protocols. These bridges work by taking a fund in crypto using one currency — let’s say, for example, Solana (SOL), and then putting it in stake in a bridge protocol, resulting in a token that can be used on the second blockchain of your choice, in this case, for example, Etherium (ETH).
This makes bridges a very important part of crypto settlements, in particular, decentralized finance (DeFi). However, as crypto industry spreads past decentralized application (DApp) platform Ethereum up to multiple driven blockchains, including metaverses, non-fungible token (NFT) markets, and lending programs, crypto-proprietors are currently being siloed in blockchains that can’t straightforwardly speak with one another. They are at risk.
What’s worse is that hackers have been very active, making as much as $1 billion since last August.
For a breakdown, the thieves got $425 million for three bridge protocols in the last two weeks. Then, another $612 million from the case of Poly Network in August (though for the record, Poly hacker returned everything back).
Nonetheless, bridges still want to be in the market, more so, being ambitious. For example, the Polkadot blockchain bridge empowers clients to automate the trading operation and add information to the exchange. As a result, one could take crypto tokens from the 100-sub blockchains it will host and then send them directly to another blockchain, let’s say DeFi lending or borrowing program, and even add commands to invest the tokens in a specified loaning pool to gain interest.
This will add convenience to the exchanging activity, plus it could likewise successfully transform the siloed crypto blockchain industry into one system. Consequently, a major objective in the business will be accomplished.
Looking at the recent crimes below, let’s explore the problem.
First, being just online. Sender’s tokens must be typically stored into the bridge protocol straightforwardly. Meaning, they are kept on the web, and subsequently, considered as the powerless “hot wallet”.
Second, minting is the way these tokens generally get through the cross-chain cryptocurrency swap. “Wrapped” renditions of the beneficiary’s tokens are what’s being exchanged. Therefore, if a hacker can mint these wrapped tokens, they can redeem them for TKTK, and then can send them off right away to their private wallets and coin mixing services.
The catch is, if bridge protocols are ripped off, it’s not the cryptocurrency exchange or DApp development company that suffers. It’s the huge number of individual clients who took a chance with their cash completely all alone.
In contrast, the investment firm which backs Wormhole, Jump Crypto, “replenished” its funds with $320 million worth of ether. This strategy is effectively keeping their investment from being bankrupt and is accepted to be reimbursed over the long run.
Binance Smart Chain (BSC)-based Qubit’s QBridge protocol was hacked on January 27. The hacker took advantage of an imperfection which convinced the DApp’s shrewd agreements in minting 77,000 wrapped ether tokens, qXETH, without actually using any assets. It was worth $185 million. They then, at that point, reclaimed the tokens for 207,000 of BSC’s Binance Coin (BNB) token, worth $80 million. After running away with the cash, both the developer and thousands of clients were exhausted.
February 11. Mound, which is Qubit’s development team head, declared that they can never again pay any further work on Qubit or Bunny Finance, another bridge convention. Instead, they would change over concentrated ventures into DeFi protocols managed by a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO). In this case, they left with nothing.
As for the Meter Passport hack, $4.4 million was stolen. It began when entertainers utilized a trick to mint wrapped ether (wETH) and BNB tokens. To make matters worse, the attacker sold the BNB on SushiSwap, a top DeFi trade, right away. It then resulted in BNB’s local price crashing. This attracted individuals to purchase the crypto coin efficiently and afterwards use them to take out credits on the Hundred Finance loaning platform.
To put that into perspective, the said loaning stage acknowledged them at the ordinary worth, and were exchanged for other unaffected tokens. Since BNB had to be returned, the lenders were left with uncollateralized loans, costing them millions of losses. To reimburse its users and Hundred Finance, Meter set aside $4.4 million of its local MTGR tokens.
With the same scam strategy, the Wormhole hack also caused a bridge to create wrapped tokens and reclaim them for genuine ether. To be specific, it was through the Solana-to-Ethereum bridge.
Lastly, returning in August was the Poly Networks hack. The hacker, who was nicknamed “Mr. White Hat”, found a vulnerable spot on the bridge and let him move all of the $612 million worth of cryptocurrency into his own wallet. Take note that this money was from the individuals who had involved it as a security to purchase wrapped tokens. Luckily, Mr. White Hat returned everything back following half a month.
As such, just like any other investment projects to which people entrust their money with, faith is key. Bridges are indeed strong now, but what if there comes a time that they seem to be vulnerable?
The United States of America is the most attractive country for doing business. America cannot be called offshore, but the taxation system here is quite adaptable and developed, one of the most progressive in the world. Consequently, if you are planning to set up a business in America, you need to understand the taxation mechanism of this country.
The primary feature of the US tax system is its three-tier structure. It means that people in business must pay taxes at several levels:
Federal and local taxes are independent. They can’t influence each other. Moreover, the federal government cannot interfere with the system that the state institutes. District authorities establish only those fees that are prescribed by the legislation of every state. In general, US companies pay the following charges:
• at a profit;
• sales tax;
• for real estate;
• for capital gains.
Corporation taxes in the US are set by both the house and state authorities. Companies are obligated to repay four main types of taxes. These are corporate income taxes, sales, real estate charges. Furthermore, capital gains are likewise taxed. Not only that, but payroll taxes are required at the federal and regional levels in America, and the quantity relies on the state.
As said before, taxation in the US exists at the local and regional levels — in these cases, taxes fluctuate. It can be an environmental tax or charges on the property or retained earnings.
In addition, do not forget about the benefits. Despite the rigidity of the US tax system, tax breaks are also present in it. For instance, the government offers massive bonuses to farms — in drought years, these benefits can reduce the taxation of farmers in America to zero.
Types of US companies available for registration to non-residents
The first is an LLC, and the second is a type C corporation, abbreviated as C-corp.
A C-corporation is a lawful entity that pays state income tax and federal income tax. First, the corporation pays corporate tax on its profits, and then its shareholders also pay income tax on two levels.
Most often, this type of company is chosen by large businesses or IT startups. Almost all major American corporations, including Google and Apple, are C-corps. And even if your business is still far from Apple, you should still think about organizing a business in the form of a C-Corporation.
Limited Liability Company — successfully combines the advantages of taxation at the owner level (as in partnerships) and limited liability of participants (as in corporations). The simplest and most beneficial form is an LLC with one owner, the so-called single-member LLC, or the transparent structure. With one owner, the company will not pay tax, and it will be paid by the individual who owns this company. The earnings of the company are estimated to be the income of a person.
The amount of this tax primarily depends on the type of company. So, S-corporations do not pay this charge on their behalf. All gains, losses, and surcharges are divided between the members of such a corporation.
C-corporations pay federal income tax in America, and regional taxation differs from state to state. For instance, in Iowa, you will have to pay 12%, and in Delaware — not a cent.
The tax system can treat an LLC company as both an S-company and a C-corporation. This tax is growing. That is, its size grows step by step, depending on the amount of gross income. It is essential for smaller companies with low revenues. So, for the first fifty thousand dollars of payment, the company pays at a rate of 15%, for the next twenty-five thousand — 25%, for another 25 thousand — 34%, for the received more than 235 thousand dollars of income — at a rate of 39%. Finally, 34% income tax is payable on all gains of more than $335,000.
Income tax in America is levied on any income that an individual earns in the US. The average US income tax ranges from 10% to 39.6%. Income tax in the United States is paid on:
Opening your business in America, if desired, is real. The procedure consists of several stages: choosing the state and the optimal type of company, registering a company, opening a bank account, obtaining a tax number, selecting a tax strategy, etc.
It will be easier to draw up a plan, optimize assets, and keep track of all tax liabilities with the help of professionals. For more information about doing business in the USA, contact the company’s specialists.
An extremely unpleasant situation with the worldwide pandemic has affected businesses and economies of many countries. Other victims of the coronavirus are supply chains – many enterprises had to revise their logistics routes and some of them failed to satisfy the needs of many clients. But during the next year, the same companies and organizations faced an increased demand for ADR changes in Singapore so the goods could be delivered on time.
In normal conditions resolving a conflict according to the law will take more time and assets. The situation has become worse when some governments decided to activate extremely strict measures and created some kind of a blockade to prevent spreading the virus.
One should know that now if a person is trying to create a company in Singapore, they can only meditate. It is the only way to settle a commercial dispute according to Singapore and many other countries’ laws.
SIMC Protocol is the solution that is aimed to make the process of resolving disputes easier. At first, this protocol has been created as an addition to the legislation. It is aimed to completely prevent legal actions from any party that started a dispute. This protocol provides an opportunity to resolve a conflict without the help of a court.
If any businessman decides to create a company within Singapore territory, they can exploit SIMC protocol in the following situations:
If the Protocol can be used any party can apply for meditation in Singapore and to do that they pay 250$ (the standard fee is 10000$).
After transferring the fee parties can agree to meet online at any time (10 business days is the limit). Taking into account the amount of the dispute, all parties have to transfer the following fees:
Why Singapore system of resolving international disputes is the best? It is because SCM has been created and signed on the territory of this country. In 2019 46 states signed the agreement and another 6 states joined later. The main aim of the SCM was to make international disputes easier and more efficient.
Experts from COREDO are always there for you to provide with more information or giving an advice about business in Singapore.
All matters concerning TM registration in Italy are handled by the TM and Patent Office. The main legal source of TM regulation in Italia comes from the Industrial Property Code but also does not exclude international agreements and conventions.
According to the Industrial Property and Civil Codes, unregistered TMs can be protected too. Protection is given to the owners of valid IP rights and secures them against acts of unfair competition (only in the area of TM use). When it comes to foreign ones, once the TM owner is able to prove that the Italian public is familiar with their product and they are planning to launch the products in Italy, a foreign TM can be protected as well.
Registering a trademark in Italy provides the following advantages:
In Italy, there are no extra criteria about being an applicant for a TM – anyone can do it. The applicants are not even required to conduct the business. It is the reputation of the brand that makes a TM known and reserves the name and the right to use for the creator. There are many things that can be registered as TMs such as words, names, sounds, number, and many others. The registration is possible if those features make a product distinguishable and identifiable.
The first step is to start the application process. This requires the applicants to:
The process of TM registration in Italy typically takes about a year. This period is used to make sure that a TM really can be registered, compare it to the other ones, confirm that no laws are violated. Once the registration is granted, it comes into force from the moment of decision published in the registration authority’s bulletin. In case of any disagreements, third parties can challenge the new TM registration for 90 days. The TM protection can be used for 60 months. However, the protection period is doubled – 120 months and can be renewed for the same period of time.
It is interesting to note that the application can be canceled at any time. Or the whole process can be done electronically.
Experts from COREDO are skilled to provide you with more information on IP and TM protection in Italy and other European countries.
Acquiring a business is always a complex and multiple-step process. Buyers need to evaluate all risks connected to the deal as precisely as possible to ensure the profitable results. Among many other aspects to analyze, tax due diligence is often disregarded when evaluating a target company.
Especially in the case of share purchases overlooking tax due diligence can place the buyer in high risk. With a share purchase agreement, the buyer gains responsibilities and liabilities of the acquired company even if they were discovered after the purchase.
Depending on the scope and reach of the activities, all companies work as a part of their local tax regulatory regimes. In addition, international businesses must also comply with tax regulations in all regions where they are present. This is a part of the difficulty for the buyers: each jurisdiction has an uncountable number of taxes for different company types. That is why buyers struggle to efficiently assess whether a potential target company truly complies with al needed tax laws to the full extent.
Once there are any tax issues discovered after the purchase, it significantly and quickly degrades the deal. To illustrate, these issues can be non-filing exposures, overstated non-capital losses, underreported tax liabilities, or others. The goal of tax due diligence is to find out about these problems before the purchase takes place. Basically, it helps the buyer to:
Traditionally, tax due diligence is processed by accountants or lawyers who have experience with corporate tax. Their job is to evaluate different types of tax exposures imposed upon a target company. Crucially, the experts do not only review corporate tax returns but also focus on high-risk areas such as:
Typically, tax diligence also involves a review of tax and legal documents including foreign reporting forms, objections, past audits, any pre-closing tax structuring steps.
Does tax due diligence seem like a difficult process to you? We will be happy to do this work for you. Experts from COREDO are true specialists in this field and have been performing such tasks for multiple years now.
Financial planners sometimes have a dilemma: should we add a securities license to the portfolio of our current services? The truth is, this service is quite requested by clients nowadays and can be very lucrative. By adopting this qualification, companies can be a one-stop-shop of financial services.
However, it is important to prepare for the process of obtaining a securities license. First of all, it is necessary to have a sponsorship from a broker-dealer, then study and pass the exam. But even after achieving the license, you must continue the education to fulfill the license requirements. This why it is so important to evaluate and compare the benefits of obtaining the license against the struggles it brings.
At first, the company should decide whether a securities license will be a part of their first or second business line. Regardless of the choice, they need to find a broker-dealer who would be prepared to sponsor their new incentive. The decision should be based on several factors like the level of payout on gross commission or the goods and services the potential sponsor offers. Generally, there are retail and independent broker-dealers.
In retail firms, brokers who are technically independent contractors work as employees. A manager oversees their activities. Also, they receive corporate support features like health insurance, an office, and others. In return, brokers in return firms face higher amounts of work and receive a lower commission. Retail firms are a good option if you are starting your financial industry path: they are able to provide you with all the necessary tools.
When it comes to independent brokers, they are traditionally able to combine multiple financial planning practices. This is the main reason why professionals with an established practice usually prefer to work with independent broker-dealers. Nevertheless, it is still important to take time and find a firm with a suitable offer of products and services to fit your clientele as well as possible.
Once the decision about the sponsor is made, you need to start studying right away to pass the securities and insurance exams. This stage can be unpleasant but is necessary. Typically, retail brokerage firms provide you with an in-house training program and pay you a salary. It is based on the previous income you received before studying began. As for independent firms, they are known to provide less support. But sometimes they have an agreement with a training provider which gives you a discount for study materials.
Obtaining a securities license can be an overwhelming and effort-consuming task. If you are truly dedicated to this goal let our experts help you. Specialists from COREDO specialize in assisting in obtaining different kinds of financial licenses including a securities license.
Capital is a crucial part of economic growth. However, some countries cannot meet their capital requirement. This is when foreign investments come and help. The most common ways of investing in other countries are foreign direct investment (FDI) and foreign portfolio investment (FPI).
With FDI, investors put their money directly in the productive assets of a foreign economy. When it comes to FPI, we speak of investing in financial assets like stocks and bonds that belong to entities overseas. In some terms, both of these investment types are similar. Yet there are clear differences between them, too. For retail investors, it is vital to be informed about the differences between them. Mainly, it is important to know because markets with high FPIs tend to be heightened and highly volatile at uncertain times. Meanwhile, FDI is considered to be less volatile.
Let’s imagine a situation where a multi-millionaire from Germany is deciding whether to invest in company acquisition in a foreign country that produces industrial machinery or to buy a large stock of the company that makes machinery. The first option is an example of foreign direct investment and the second – of the foreign portfolio investment.
It is thought traditionally that FDI is a privilege of big investors who have enough capital for investing directly into a foreign economy. Meanwhile, an average investor would probably choose FPI. Basically, buying foreign stock and bonds, mutual funds or exchange-traded funds means becoming engaged in FPI.
Capital is always in demand and is very mobile. To evaluate the level of its desirability, investors use standard criteria:
The first difference between FDI and FPI is the level of control the foreign investor obtains. Typically, FDI investors are active participants and decision-makers in the companies they invest in. When we speak of FPI investors, they are usually quite passive and are not involved in the daily activities of the company. Unless FPI investors have a controlling interest in the company, they do not engage in strategic planning either.
The second difference is the timing. FDI investors take a long-term approach to their investments since it may take years before the project is completely launched. As for FPI, investors can profess in the long run but more often invest in a shorter timeline. In other words, in the case of economic turbulences, FPI investors can quickly leave the nation and liquidate their assets. But for FDI this procedure may not be this easy.
For more investment consulting visit our website and leave your contact details. COREDO experts will be happy to schedule a personal meeting with you.
South Korea does not consider cryptocurrencies legal. While exchanges are deemed legal, they still need to obey a set of strict regulations. Since transactions in crypto cannot be viewed either as cash or financial assets, they are not taxed which makes crypto taxing a grey area in South Korea. Nevertheless, the local government has stated its intention of levying taxes on cryptocurrencies in the nearest future and plans to issue the framework in 2022.
The regulation of crypto exchanges in South Korea can be judged as quite harsh considering the mandatory government registration and other rules dictated by the Financial Supervisory Service of South Korea (FSS). In 2017, the local government forbade financial institutions in South Korea to host Bitcoin futures transactions and restricted the use of all anonymous crypto accounts. Moreover, the reporting requirements for banks with crypto exchanges became stricter in 2018.
According to the new laws, a trader must create a real-name account with the same bank as their cryptocurrency dealer. In other words, cryptocurrency trading is restricted to “real-name bank accounts” and this is the only way to use e-wallets. Also, there are AML/CFT rules that oblige the bank and the dealer to authorize the trader’s identity.
This new legislation was published in 2020. It extended the AML/CFT conditions that cryptocurrency exchanges in South Korea must comply with. In addition, it orders all South Korean exchanges and requiring companies to gain an operational license from the Financial Intelligence Unit which is part of the Financial Services Commission by the end of September 2021.
The new regulations in South Korea apply to Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) who perform these activities:
These operations include cryptocurrency exchanges, Initial Coin Offering (ICO) projects, and custodian wallet providers.
So what are the changes for all crypto service providers in South Korea? After the implementation of the new legislation, they all are obliged to register with the local financial regulators and upgrade their AML/CFT systems. Even though these conditions are not completely new as they were published in 2018, it is only recently that they became mandatory.
From now on all VASPs are required to:
The transition period is still ongoing and will end in September 2021. The punishment for not having an approved bank account can be extremely strict and include prison detention or fines up to 43,000 USD.
Are you planning to enter the South Korean market as a crypto exchange? COREDO is here to help with complying to all necessary requirements or applying for a license.
Nowadays, prepaid cards allow people to have direct and fast access to their money, yet they do not have to be carrying any cash around. There are a few options for companies to choose from when they plan to issue prepaid cards to employees, customers, or others.
One of the options is white labeling. The process goes like this:
The pro of this approach is the fact that a company does not need to build a card from scratch. Meanwhile, it can take advantage of using reloadable prepaid cards.
Using the white label method of issuing prepaid cards has many benefits. To illustrate, here is a list including some of the advantages:
White label prepaid cards save your company efforts and time because you do not need to research the best strategy and technology to bring the product to the market. You only put your logo and the rest of the product is created by another company.
Prepaid cards can be customized when it comes to color and design. Moreover, you can also define who is able to use the cards: customers, contractors, employees, etc.
The fees always depend on the settings put into the prepaid cards. For example, your company can receive a percentage from every sale and get the fee that was charged when a cardholder used the ATM. These opportunities represent an additional source of revenue.
Your company can save a lot of money and time thanks to prepaid cards because they really streamline the payroll process. This characteristic especially applies if a business has a large workforce. Once the prepaid cards are connected to employees’ earnings, the process becomes automated. In addition, no extra money spent on paper checks.
Prepaid cards can be a way of offering customers rewards like cashback and bonus points. Thus the customer is motivated to choose your company among others and builds personal loyalty to the brand.
Are you already thinking of offering prepaid cards to your employees or customers? Are you looking for an additional revenue stream? COREDO can help you issue prepaid cards using white label technology.
Generally, codes, source code, programs, and all related software are protected by copyright law. Not only the database structure but also its content must be thoroughly protected. The reason for this is the expenses spent on the financial, material, organizational, and other aspects. However, costs like these are assumed once the number of materials reaches ten thousand elements.
What is a database? Independent materials of various types can be collected and presented in one set that is designed to be systematized in a certain way. In order for a database to be useful, the materials must be available to search and be processed by a computer. People who create a database and collect, process, and situate all the elements are called database manufacturers.
There is no specific copyright registration regime stated in Hong Kong. Automatically, copyright is assigned to every original and tangibly recorded work. Holders of copyright have an exclusive right to create copies of their work and to distribute it publicly. Surprisingly, under the Copyright act in a special administrative region in China, software and databases belong to the category of literary works.
The protection of copyright basically consists of punishment for its infringement. Perpetrating copyright is considered a civil liability. Moreover, if someone unrightfully uses the work of the copyright holder for example for sale, they can even carry criminal liability.
Besides copyright protection, there are special regulations for protecting innovations by granting their creators with a patent. In Hong Kong, a patent can be registered for usage in the industrial domain and must not be a part of the excluded invention classes. Traditionally, patents are divided into short-term and standard. In a special administrative region of China it is necessary to apply for a patent registration at one of the offices:
When it comes to patenting software, the successful patent registration depends on whether:
Thanks to this short post we have discovered how databases can be protected in Hong Kong. Firstly, it can be protected under copyright law since it falls under the category of literary works. Also, they can be protected by obtaining a patent under the condition that the software complies with the patent requirements.
For a more detailed consultation on copyright protection do not hesitate to contact COREDO. We are happy to provide you with a free consultation.
It is such an easy concept if you think about it. But let’s put in words its real definition and discuss different types of companies. A company is a legal entity that is created to operate a business. The creator can be either a group or a sole individual who would like to conduct commercial or industrial business. The jurisdiction of every state has predefined corporate laws that dictate the variety of company organization ways including rules for taxing and financial liabilities.
The creators of a company can choose a type that suits their needs and future activities as of partnerships, proprietorships, or corporations. Another way of distinguishing companies is deciding whether it is private or public. Each type involves different regulations, financial reporting, and structures of ownership. What is a similar characteristic for all types is that they are aimed at earning profit.
How does a company work? Well, basically it is an artificial person. Corporate personhood given to a company is what mainly differentiates from individuals who are a part of the company. As mentioned earlier, companies are traditionally made for earning a profit, yet there is an exception which is nonprofit charities.
Although countries have specific regulations regarding the definition of company types and their organizations, many similarities can be found around the world. It is also important to mention that companies have very similar rights to the ones an individual has. For examples, we can take the right to pay taxes, hire employees, enter into contracts, or borrow funds.
When it comes to finding benefits of starting a company, we can talk about certain freedom that is given by an opportunity of income diversification, visible correlation between effort and reward, flexibility. However, there are disadvantages as well: responsibilities for staff, legal liability, financial responsibility, and possible long work hours.
In this part, we will discuss basic the basic company classifications. It diversifies:
Do you need to create a legal entity for your business intentions? Do not hesitate to entrust this administrative process to the team of COREDO.
The procedures Know Your Customer and Customer Due Diligence can seem similar at a first glance. Nevertheless, we can spot differences between them. KYC aims at creating a risk profile of a customer: before starting any kind of business relationship, it is useful to retrieve the customer’s information. Alternatively, CDD is a way of confirming that the customer’s data is truthful and correct. In addition, CDD consists of background and utility ownership checking.
To define the main difference, KYC puts emphasis on financing. CDD also includes the financial part, but it generally is carried out in a continuous way. It represents a continuous framework of assurance serving especially organizations that have numerous transactions on daily basis as for example real estate companies or banks. Institutions like these use advanced programs that are set to monitor moves of funds in order to identify suspicious transactions. Thus a well-processed KYC can serve as a great basis for maintaining quality CDD, and altogether they can guarantee that the institutional systems are not being misused for money laundering purposes.
Nowadays, Customer Due Diligence is a crucial part of the AML routine. It is regularly performed in certain time intervals. The check-ups include control of geographical distribution, amount of money, or transaction volume. In our modern age, the software runs the monitoring automatically, However, the automated systems must be updated regularly.
It is interesting to mention that previously used KYC procedures were considered not effective enough, which is why those procedures have turned into automated CDD applications. This novelty helps to reassure CDD during the whole business relationship. This is vital because a customer’s risk profile can change drastically over time.
In COREDO we assist our clients with creating risk profiles, compounding CDD and KYC. Write us a quick message and get your free consultation.
When a group of companies and customers concentrate around one certain niche and become all interconnected, they basically create a vertical market. Vertical markets have specialized needs: companies customize their goods and services according to those needs and normally do not serve broader markets. An opposite of a vertical market is a horizontal market where companies offer their goods to various industries.
It is typical for vertical markets to have high entry barriers and their own business standards. For companies, it may be hard to become a part of a vertical market, but entering it gives them an opportunity to realize higher profits while focusing on a narrow customer base which eventually makes their marketing campaigns more cost-effective. Companies in vertical markets get very competitive, they also can be characterized as highly experienced and specialized in their market’s specifics, terminology, and regulations.
Unsimilar to horizontal markets, vertical markets create products and services for niche customer groups. That is why companies in vertical markets do need to choose a completely different strategy in comparison to the ones in the horizontal markets. The managers of vertical market businesses decide whether they would focus on certain industries or demographics.
However, focusing on one industry and specific demographics does not mean that a customer base must be small. This customer can be wide and at the same time provide a great revenue opportunity as the demand for a specific product rises.
The possibility of having a comparative advantage is definitely a positive for vertical market operators. They can choose a segment and gradually grow expertise within it which means they become professional with the respective terminology, regulations, etc. Given that all companies behave like this, the competitiveness among them grows as well.
Another benefit of participating in a vertical market is an opportunity of saving marketing expenses. Operators only need to target a smaller group of customers instead of reaching out to wide masses. This is also the reason why their campaigns can be focused and concrete. Vertical market operators know their customer base very well, therefore they are able to adapt their goods, services, and approach in general.
In COREDO we assist our customers with their investment decisions which among other aspects includes processing market analysis of different types. Leave us your contact and we will be happy to arrange a consultation for you.
The year 2021 is marked to host another M&A forum in Japan. A series of interactive panel discussions is planned for September, but we can discuss Japanese M&A already now. Let’s take a closer look at the procedure of mergers and acquisitions and how they are done in Japan.
Typically, the process contains the following stages:
Depending on the size, structure, and complexity of the deal, the timing of the procedure may vary. Normally though, it takes about three to six months. More time can be required if the transfer involves share exchange, business transfer, or corporate divestiture.
In Japan, the Companies Law is the main piece of legislation applicable to company acquisition. Potentially, purchasers also need to comply with other regulations:
It is also important to mention that all documentation including acquisition agreements must comply with the local Japanese laws. In fact, business transfer agreements or purchasing of shares can be ruled by laws of other jurisdictions, yet they are typically regulated by the Japanese one.
It is typical of buyers to purchase the whole ownership of shares and assets issued by the company. In case certificates of shares are issued by the company, issuing share certificates becomes the way of transferring shares. Alternatively, shares can be transferred through a transferring agreement between buyers and sellers. This kind of agreement requires the consent of counterparties and creditors, which is what makes it different from the acquisition agreement.
When a company sells its shares, the shareholders must agree with it. Sometimes minority shareholders can disagree with such a decision. In this case, majority stakeholders can repurchase their shares. However, it must be added that this action has to be approved by the BoD and should not happen without notifying the minority stakeholders. In Japan, the whole process of forcing minority stakeholders cannot exceed a twenty-day period.
COREDO would be honored to assist you with the M&A procedures taking place in Japan. We will help with planning and carrying out all needed transactions.
In order to match the level of returns one expects from their portfolio, it is necessary to rebalance the portfolio on the regular basis. Basically, rebalancing means buying some stocks and selling some bonds or vice versa – a similar maintenance procedure like visiting a dentist regularly. This procedure also helps match the asset portfolio with the level of risk you are ready to take. Rebalancing is a part of the long run of the passive investment strategy. If rebalancing is approached in a disciplined way it can increase long-term returns by preventing the investor from making panicked moves.
The percentage of different investments in the portfolio is defined as asset allocation. Investors predefine their target asset allocation which can only be reached by regular portfolio rebalancing. Let’s say you hold more stocks. This way the value of your portfolio will be more volatile due to the market swings, therefore you will be taking on more risk. However, stocks usually have higher performance than bonds in the long run. That is why investors tend to expect a bigger part of their returns from stocks.
Typically, rebalancing involves selling stock and reinvesting the money into bonds. It might seem that it is more beneficial to hold 100% of the portfolio in bonds. Yet it is not so from the viewpoint of emotions that every investor has. For example, seeing a retirement account go down due to the decline in the stock market can force an investor to make poor rushed decisions such as selling stocks at a loss. On the other hand, rebalancing portfolios with bonds that are more stable can help keep the portfolio on track to the target allocation and match the desired risk equivalent.
Although there is no optimal frequency for rebalancing strategy, there is the main principle of how it should be done. Rebalancing mainly represents selling overweight assets.
To take an example, we can imagine that an investor holds 70% stocks and 30% bonds in their portfolio. When a stock market does well, the portfolio value represented by these stocks goes up from 70% to 75%. It seems like a positive change, but in fact, the portfolio becomes riskier. To avoid taking a higher risk, the investor should sell that 5% of the stock and invest that money in buying bonds. That way the portfolio becomes rebalanced.
Without a doubt, selling the stock at the moment when its value grows can be challenging from a psychological point of view. Nevertheless, it is crucial to remember:
Do you need any help with managing your finances? Our team of exceptional specialists are ready to assist. We will be happy to see you at COREDO headquarters.
Large corporations and even small businesses often have problems with protecting their intellectual property. We will mainly focus today on protecting IP in the United States. Protecting intellectual property is not only ethics but even modern-day politics. The reason for this is that materialized ideas are valued extremely highly.
The United States, being a very individualistic society, actively promotes the importance of the intellectual property. It is given by the thought of ideas processed by the human mind being a part of the comparative advantage. This is why the intellectual property protection systems in the US are among the effective ones in the world.
All original inventions are recommended to be immediately filed for a patent application in the US Patent and Trademark Office. Once the certificate is granted, the copyrights are valid for 20 years. It should be mentioned though that the validity term of IP protection varies for each type and can actually be renewed in the future.
Another way of protecting intellectual property is registering a trademark. All the identification details used for product or service marketing including names, logos, or symbols can be protected under the trademark rights. After the TM registration, trademark protection in the US covers it. There are other examples:
Although, the US federal protection automatically applies to creative works without the US Copyright Office registration, registering your work can be helpful as it enhances one’s rights.
The problem of rightsholders abusing TM rights is still relevant in the US. Those people register trademarks with the only aim – restricting marketing competition. An example of such activity is the artificial extension of copyright protection term by retroactively including a co-author after the original author’s death.
Protection of IP in the US and generally in the whole world remains a high priority. It can seem premature maybe for startup processes, yet in the future, this aspect can influence the accessibility to get funding or preventing unfair competition.
In case you are planning to reinforce IP protection on your valid assets, contact COREDO to receive a detailed consultation.
The process of transforming funds achieved in criminal activity into legal properties is defined as money laundering. Its goal is to disguise the illegally earned money as funds from a non-criminal activity. For proving that a certain case can be deemed money laundering, it must meet the following three elements.
To accuse someone of money laundering, it must be proven that the defendant was aware that the money they hold came from fraud. Otherwise, even if one participated in money laundering but not consciously, they cannot be accused of criminal activity since they did not suspect that they are performing a crime. Nevertheless, the prosecutor’s burden of evidence or circumstantial proof is rather low. The prosecutors actually have to prove that you knew of the illegal status of funds obtainment.
For accusing someone, the prosecutor must demonstrate that one was involved in the beginning or end of a financial transaction such as purchasing, donation, loan, withdrawal, transfer, credit extension, safe-deposit operations, etc.
A person can be accused of money laundering if they were involved in one of the following money laundering steps:
The task of the prosecutor is to find out what happened during the money laundering case. They need to link the illegal activities to the people who conducted them and prove that those individuals were aware that the funds were coming from an illegal source. Moreover, the prosecutor needs to find evidence that the convicted individuals deliberately planned to “launder” the “dirty” money and make them look legal.
Would you like to learn more about anti-money laundering structures are processes? We would be happy to provide you with a personalized consultation at COREDO.
Since Bulgaria is a member of the European Union, it is rightly considered to be a favorable location for developing business. The same reason applies to the active growth of financial technologies and crypto asset operations in this country. Are you also planning to start a crypto company there? Then you have stumbled upon the right post: we will discuss the innovations in the crypto business regulation field of Bulgaria.
It is vital to acknowledge that last year Bulgaria took some active steps towards harmonizing its local legislation with the EU Directives covering illegal income. Now to start a crypto business in Bulgaria, entrepreneurs need to take care of anti-money laundering compliance and customer due diligence requirements. This is especially important for crypto exchange services providers and e-wallet providers.
The adaptation of cryptocurrencies in Bulgaria is not stopping. Therefore, companies are required to take AML compliance seriously. To prevent money laundering and support the combat against criminal activity, crypto exchanges and their operators have to register at the National Revenue Agency.
The innovation in regulation taking place in Bulgaria mainly relates to solving the problems that arise with:
Money laundering remains a big problem internationally. Unfortunately, the development of cryptocurrencies only supports this challenge. Yes, no doubt that cryptocurrencies offer faster and cheaper international transactions, yet they attract criminal activity to the sector. The innovations in Bulgarian regulation aim to support the business transparency initiative promoted by the EU. That is why these changes are important to consider while starting a crypto business in Bulgaria.
Order a private consultation with COREDO if you have more questions about AML compliance or crypto regulation in European countries.
The selling company that extends credit to buyers needs to consider allowance for credit losses. It is an estimate of debt that probably will not be recovered by the company. Typically, companies do not conduct cash transactions with each other but rather use payment on credit. Selling goods or services on credit can be viewed as risky since not all payments are guaranteed to be collected. To anticipate this possibility, companies establish a certain amount of allowance for credit losses.
When creating financial statements, the allowance helps companies to take into consideration these possible losses and not overestimate the potential income. A company then states how much of its receivables will be irresponsible. In fact, it is not necessary to know which client or what debt amount will not be paid. Instead, an approximate amount that will be uncollectable should be used. In accounting, these expected losses are placed in a balance sheet contra asset account and called:
For compensating credit losses, companies have a bad debt reserve, and that’s where any increase of allowance for credit losses should be included.
Delinquent or bad debts can be calculated by using statistical modeling, for example, default probability. This can be performed on the basis of historical data taken from the given company or the whole industry. The current statistical modeling allowance changes all the time. This is the reason why companies need to change the allowance for credit losses on the regular basis.
This accounting technic is not only used by businesses providing goods and services, but also by financial institutions. For example, banks report uncollectible debts on loan payments.
Do you look for assistance in the sphere of corporate finance such as calculating the allowance for credit losses? Specialists in COREDO have quality experience in providing such services internationally.
The abbreviation of SEPA means the single euro payment area. It was created by the EU in order to harmonize the transfer process of cashless payments among euro countries. The SEPA architecture was designed as a convenient tool for European consumers, businesses, and government agents while making direct debit or credit payments. Besides, this system is governed by the European Commission.
It was the year 1999 when the story of SEPA began. At that time the banking industry already considered a need of having a single payments area since it would lead to further integration of EU economies. Yet only in 2007, the EU passed the Payment Services Directive that offered the legal basis for SEPA. As the SEPA architecture was progressing, in 2011 it replaced national payments and in 2017 allowed banks to transfer 15000 euros in a record time of ten seconds.
Starting from 2018, the European Commission made a proposal of stopping the extra cross-border charges for non-EU states. In addition, the proposal contains the rule that everyone in the EU can transfer euros for the same price as with their domestic transfer. Also, the new condition came: consumers must be informed about the cost of a currency conversion before paying abroad.
The main goal of this system is to make foreign electronic payments as cheap and smooth as internal transfers. Moreover, the single euro payments area brings competition to the industry of payments: it creates a single market and brings the prices down. According to statistics, SEPA covers the area where more than 520 million people live, and those people process more than 122 billion e-payments annually. As of 2021, the area includes 36 countries. In fact, it does not only cover the EU member states but also San Marino, Monaco, Liechtenstein, Switzerland, Vatican City, Norway, and Iceland.
The managing regulators of SEPA are the European Commission and the European Central Bank. Together their task is to govern the board and to process the agenda together with government and consumer groups.
Are you looking for a SEPA solution for your financial company? Do not hesitate to contact the COREDO office to get more details.
Hungary has a significantly leading position in international trade, lending services, property registration, and enforcing contractual conditions as it was stated in the World Bank ratings. This country has many advantages as a business destination thanks to having a stable political situation, developed infrastructure, skilled labor force, and high living standards. Moreover, Hungary is considered a developed market economy and offers investor-friendly taxation and laws, the visa-free regime in the Schengen zone, simplified residence procedure.
If you are thinking about starting a business in Hungary, it could be useful to focus on eco-farming, IT, power generation, hospitality, transport, mining, and mechanical engineering. In addition, it goes without saying that Hungary is a suitable business destination since it is an EU member. However, there are other pros of Hungary that are not so obvious. Those include affordable office space pricing, little red tape, and perks of SMBs.
Let’s take a look at the list of organization forms possible to register in Hungary:
Hungary is a popular place for foreign entrepreneurs to open a company there, one of big reasons being Hungary’s investor-friendly taxation. Being the lowest one in the EU, income tax in Hungary equals only 9%. That is why it makes more sense to open a company there than in an offshore zone. Furthermore, the foreign companies that participate in environmental protection projects, food industry, Internet provision, warehousing, or film industry have a possibility of receiving a tax relief of up to 80% for as long as 10 years. Hungary also does not impose any taxes on dividends, royalties, and dividends.
When it comes to other corporate taxes, they are the following:
Our clients are people who are in the process of registering a company in different European states including Hungary. Do not hesitate to contact COREDO specialists with the requests related to this topic.
Particularly since 2018 cryptocurrencies have been experiencing unseen growth. Yet there are not the only attractive products present on the market today. Among others, there are NPLs which represent a series of “financial instruments”. Many economists and investors are greatly interested in them.
However, we will focus on another subject: the use of state-created virtual currencies issued by national banks as an alternative means to cash or cryptocurrencies. The first states, China and Sweden, forecast an unofficial issuance of the e-currencies in 2021 and 2022. Another country to join the race might be the US forecasting the digital dollar issuance already in 2021.
The European Union is also preparing to issue its own e-money. The initiative is aimed at replacing the use of cash altogether and gaining greater control over financial crime prevention. The new digital euro is supposed to have the same financial quotation on the currency market as euro banknotes have. It will have the same operational area meaning Europe and Eurozone countries. The difference is that the currency will be centralized and permanently monitored by the ECB and the national central banks. While establishing the idea of the digital euro, the European Parliament aimed at creating a new instrument of preventing an economic monopoly of private individuals because they determine rules and conditions of currencies and exchanges outside of any regulation. The digital euro project is to start in the middle of 2021.
Mainly, the cryptocurrencies and the state digital currencies differ in the initiatives they preach. The path of the digital euro is to create greater transparency, exclude volatility by keeping the price value the same, and mitigate the financial risks connected with the use of cryptocurrencies.
The establishment of the digital euro brings the following opportunities:
Does the question of digital currencies catch your attention but you still need professional advice on this topic? Please get in touch with our office agents in COREDO.
The modern community of financial advisory is well aware of how important the services such as retirement and investment planning as well as general financial counseling are. Nevertheless, the general public can underestimate the value of these services which is intensely influenced by the smartphone accessibility to financial services, robo-advisory, and low-cost brokerage services. Yet according to the industry research, the advisors’ role is still very important.
A low-cost investment management company called Vanguard Funds has published a study Advisor’s Alpha. According to the study, clients who work with a quality financial advisor are estimated to have a 3% annual value grow of their portfolios. Understandably, this progress cannot be proved to be linear and in perfect order. Instead, the study considers that the bigger part of such an increase comes during the periods of higher greed and fear on the markets which is the moment when advisors are supposed to provide their clients with assistance on following their financial goals.
In its whitepaper Alpha, Beta, and Now … Gamma, Morningstar supported the Vanguard’s opinion. The gamma in the name actually referred to the extra income received by an investor thanks to making better financial decisions. The whitepaper deems that investors who receive professional services from financial advisors register a 1.82% growth of their annual returns.
The outcome of these studies is the fact that financial advisors act rather like behavioral coaches than money managers. Seeking financial advice proves to bring higher annual returns which is also shown by another study from Aon Hewitt. It demonstrated that the annual return of those who received professional financial advice were on average 1.86% higher than of those who decided to seek financial advice in online sources. The numbers were proved to be higher once again on the example of receiving financial advisory during the uncertain years 2009-2010.
To sum it up, we can say that financial advisory comes truly in handy during the times when markets are volatile. The reason being redundant emotions influencing the investor. Moreover, another crucial task executed by financial advisors is helping the clients stick to their long-term goals.
COREDO provides professional financial advisory services for private profiles and companies. Please contact our office to arrange a personal consultation.
The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has the policy of reporting countries with insufficient AML / CFT regimes from 2000 and has proven to be successful over the years. Three times a year the FATF issues public documents that include jurisdictions whose measures against money laundering and terrorist financing are poor. In general, the FATF has inspected more than a hundred jurisdictions as of 2020 (80 of them were publicly recognized). Out of those 80, 60 jurisdictions made an effort to implement the reforms needed for addressing AML / CFT insufficiencies which means that they do not use the system anymore.
The international financial system can be harmed because of the significant deficiencies in anti-money laundering, anti-terrorism funding, and anti-proliferation financing regimes of those high-risk jurisdictions. That is why the FATF urges all countries and jurisdictions to conduct a deeper level of due diligence on the listed countries. In fact, other countries are asked to conduct countermeasures in order to prevent continuing money laundering, terrorist funding, and proliferation financing.
To be able to reflect on the countries’ success in overcoming strategic flaws, the FATF and its regional bodies (FSRBs) work in collaboration. The FATF urges the countries to form an action plan, praises their success, and monitors their activities. The organization recommends following through with the details of risk assessments.
The list of jurisdictions under increased monitoring includes the countries whose progress is being monitored and evaluated by the FATF. The organization encourages to continue the progress these countries made in fighting money laundering and terrorist financing. According to the report published in February 2021, the jurisdictions with strategic deficiencies are:
As the countries with strategic AML / CFT weakness pose a potential danger to the whole international financial system, the FATF needs to determine them and track their performance. The FATF runs the tests to define the jurisdiction’s risks, deficiencies, specific threats.
If a jurisdiction shows low marks during the risk assessment, it earns a place on the list and is required to make an action plan to remove its deficiencies. The country can leave the list once all or almost all of the points of the action plan are met. The removal procedures also include on-site control. However, after the exclusion, the country still should continue on collaborating with the FATF.
Are you looking for a consultation in the field of AML compliance? Contact our AML specialists to receive the tailor-made advice for your case.
All over the world many businesses and economies were negatively influenced by the global pandemic. The supply chains of all kinds were also damaged: the cases of non-compliance with contractual obligations grew in numbers immensely. This caused a high demand for more effective alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods in many jurisdictions including Singapore.
Filing a lawsuit was always an expensive and time-consuming option that became even more complicated after many governments put in place strict quarantine measures. That is why the newly opening businesses in Singapore and other countries should keep in mind that mediation might be the best mechanism for settling commercial disputes, especially since the pandemic is still not over.
In search of an expedited, economical, and effective for resolving disputes during COVID-19 times, Singapore has come up with the SIMC (Singapore International Mediation Centre) Protocol. Originally, it was designed to become an addition to the existing legislation. Mainly, the Protocol is focused on mediating international commercial disputes without the need to spend big funds on legal proceedings since the economic uncertainty is still growing.
The local lawmakers stated that settlement agreements are enforceable under the Singapore Convention on Mediation. The Protocol would be in force till the end of June 2021. The goal of SIMC Protocol is to mediate disputes caused by the pandemic itself or by legislation implied because of the pandemic.
It is also important to mention the key features of the Protocol:
Do you need additional advice on settling a dispute in Singapore? Contact COREDO to receive quality recommendations on this topic.