I have been leading COREDO since 2016 and often see strong products stall in Latin America because of two factors: choosing the wrong acquiring model and underestimating local regulatory and technical nuances. The COREDO team has implemented dozens of projects in the EU, the UK, Singapore and Dubai, and in recent years: in Brazil and Mexico. This has allowed us to develop tools that shorten time-to-market, lower MDR and increase authorization rate without compromises on compliance.
In this article I have compiled operational best practices for e‑commerce, marketplaces, fintech companies and subscription services. The text is both strategic and applied: from choosing a model (local vs international acquiring) to specific KPIs, fraud rules, onboarding checklists and our migration practice from foreign PSPs to local acquirers.
Local acquiring in Latin America

Latin America: one of the fastest-growing online payments markets, and acquiring in Latin America requires local thinking. Card acquiring in Brazil and card acquiring in Mexico work differently than in Europe or Asia: a strong role of local schemes (ELO, Hipercard), alternative methods (Pix, Boleto, Oxxo Pay) and the specifics of address scoring.
International acquiring Brazil/Mexico is attractive for its ease of getting started, but often loses conversion: issuing banks in LATAM are more likely to decline cross-border transactions. In e-commerce this hits the authorization rate and raises the decline rate without objective reasons. COREDO’s practice confirms: local routing and local payment methods deliver a conversion increase of 10–25% compared with pure cross-border.
Acquiring: local vs international

The choice between local and international acquiring directly affects conversion, MDR level and the risk of encountering hidden fees. Let’s look at the advantages local acquiring provides in Brazil and how that is reflected in the final price and decline rates.
Acquiring in Brazil: advantages
Local acquiring in Brazil provides direct access to ELO and Hipercard, support for installments (parcelado) and precise risk scoring taking into account ZIP codes and device fingerprinting. A solution developed at COREDO for a fashion retailer showed an approval rate increase from 67% to 86% after switching to local processors Cielo and Rede, taking into account EMV 3‑D Secure 2 (3DS2) and tokenization.
Advantages of local acquiring in Mexico
In Mexico, local acquiring increases card approvals by taking into account Banxico rules and local behavioral analytics. Integration with PSPs in Mexico allows adding Oxxo Pay and SPEI/CoDi, which provides a noticeable uplift in conversion for marketplaces and digital services.
MDR and hidden fees: where percentages are lost
MDR fees in Brazil and MDR fees in Mexico depend on MCC, average ticket, chargeback profile and local payment methods. In Brazil, parcelado increases the total cost of ownership of acquiring due to financing of installments. In Mexico, cash via Oxxo Pay adds fixed fees.
Conversion: local/international
The comparison of local and international acquiring by conversion is almost always in favor of local. Authorization rate in Brazil and Mexico increases due to:
- local routing to Cielo, Rede, Getnet, PagSeguro;
- support for local schemes (ELO/Hipercard);
- 3DS2 according to issuers’ regional rules and soft declines retry logic.
Regulation and Licensing

An analysis of the regulatory framework and licensing requirements shows which legal and operational standards govern the work of financial institutions across different jurisdictions. The section sequentially examines practical examples and regulatory reporting, in particular the approach of the Banco Central do Brasil and the specifics of Brazilian supervision.
Central Bank of Brazil Reporting
Acquiring regulator: Banco Central do Brasil. For payment service providers and acquirers a licensing and reporting regime applies, including capital requirements, risk management and information security. A separate layer is LGPD as the basis for data privacy and data localization.
Banxico and CNBV in Mexico
In Mexico supervision is carried out by Banco de México (Banxico) and CNBV (Comisión Nacional Bancaria y de Valores). Regulatory requirements for acquiring in Mexico cover operational risks, PLD/FT (AML/CFT) and transaction reporting rules. For marketplaces it is important to understand the status of split settlements and the procedure for disclosing fees in statements.
Local Registrations and Taxation
To enter the Brazilian market, a foreign seller often needs to open a CNPJ and a local legal entity, especially when using local acquiring and working with Pix/Boleto. Taxation of payments in Brazil for non-residents affects service taxes and possible withholding tax, and this needs to be modeled in advance.
Impact of payment methods on strategy

Payment methods shape a company’s commercial and operational decisions, defining the customer experience, risks and monetization channels. Understanding their impact on strategy is especially important when assessing local innovations, for example how Pix is changing card acquiring in Brazil.
How Pix affects acquiring in Brazil
Pix: Brazil’s instant payments that changed basket composition. In low AOV categories Pix pulls share from cards, lowering the MDR, but changing decline and return behavior. In high‑ticket segments cards and parcelado still dominate, and card acquiring in Brazil remains critical.
Why connect Boleto, Oxxo and CoDi/SPEI?
In Mexico the role of CoDi (Cobro Digital) and SPEI is in instant transfers, and Oxxo Pay covers cash scenarios. Connecting local payment methods (Boleto, Oxxo Pay, Pix) expands the audience, but increases the complexity of reconciliation and risk rules. The solution developed by COREDO for a marketplace in Mexico combined CoDi/SPEI and cards into a single settlement calendar and reduced operational errors in reconciliation statements by 40%.
Processors and local schemes
Support for ELO, Mastercard, Visa, Hipercard in Brazil is mandatory. Among local processors we most often see Cielo, Rede, Getnet and PagSeguro; their behavior in terms of authorization rate differs from MCC to MCC. Correct routing between acquirer processor via ISO 8583 and, where available, ISO 20022, yields an increase in approvals and resilience.
Connection models: Merchant/PayFac/BIN

The choice of connection model — classic merchant, PayFac or BIN sponsorship — is determined by a combination of requirements for control, speed to market and operational responsibility. This determines how quickly and legally a European business can connect acquiring in Brazil, which legal and technical requirements will need to be met, and what costs will arise.
How to connect acquiring in Brazil
For a European merchant, the question “how to connect acquiring in Brazil for a European business” starts with choosing a model: a local company with a CNPJ and a local merchant account, or an international PSP with local routing. The first option takes more time but delivers the best conversion and control over MDR.
Acquisitions in Mexico by a foreign company
In Mexico, “how to connect acquiring in Mexico for a foreign company” depends on having an RFC and a local bank account for settlements in MXN. Without local presence, a hybrid approach is reasonable: an international provider with a local partner and integration with Oxxo/SPEI.
How long does it take to open a merchant account in Mexico? On average 2–5 weeks for standard categories and up to 7–9 weeks for marketplaces with split settlements, when deeper Due Diligence of sub-merchants is required.
PayFac and BIN sponsorship in Latin America
The PayFac model vs a classic merchant account in LatAm is a question of scale and control. PayFac/aggregator simplifies onboarding of sub-merchants, speeds up go-live and provides ready white-label acquiring. A classic merchant account increases margin and flexibility of risk policies, but requires its own license/registration and processes.
Underwriting: reserves and holdbacks
Underwriting and merchant due diligence in LatAm are based on MCC, AOV, CBR and chargeback history. Rolling reserves and acquiring reserves in LatAm are applied more often in high-risk and subscription models. The clearer the KYC package and refund policy, the lower the collateral and the faster the holdbacks are released.
API, PCI, EMV 3-D Secure: security
A reliable technical and security foundation is not a set of abstract requirements but a practical toolkit: APIs, PCI compliance, implementation of EMV 3‑D Secure and tokenization provide security and trust during transactions. When integrating for marketplaces and mobile applications, the correct combination of these components ensures both regulatory compliance and convenience for users.
Marketplace and application integration
Technical integration of acquiring APIs for marketplaces requires support for marketplace payments and split settlements at the acquirer/PSP level. Online for Brazil: online acquiring for marketplaces with support for parcelado, Pix and local schemes; for Mexico: compatibility with Oxxo and SPEI is required.
PCI DSS, EMV and tokenization
PCI DSS and local compatibility for acquiring: the foundation. We determine the SAQ type, deploy P2PE on terminals and encrypt PAN on entry. EMV and contact/contactless payments in Latin America create a liability shift: in the absence of EMV, fraud liability falls on the party without EMV support.
Fraud management: reducing declines
Fraud management and transaction profiling are built on a combination of rules and machine learning for fraud detection. We use fraud indicators: BIN analysis, velocity rules, device fingerprinting and geo-patterns. The balance between protection and conversion is expressed in the false positive rate: reducing it directly increases revenue.
Operational processes: settlements and FX
In operational processes, settlements, FX management, timely reporting and regular reconciliation play a key role – the accuracy and transparency of financial flows depend on them. Particular attention is required for settlement cycles and settlement timelines, since their configuration determines how quickly and correctly positions will be closed and reports generated.
Settlement cycles: settlement timelines
Settlement cycles and settlement timelines in Brazil and Mexico vary by payment methods and providers. Cards are more often T+1/T+2, Pix and SPEI: closer to T+0/T+1, while Boleto and Oxxo have confirmation delays. Settlement lag is critical for cash‑flow: the financial model must account for schedules and possible holds.
Hedging currency settlements
FX and currency conversion in international payouts (BRL, MXN, USD) are a zone of hidden losses. Settlement currency and FX spread affect the final MDR when converted to the base currency. We set control rates, use hedging and verify chains of international transfers and correspondent banks so as not to lose margin in transit.
Reporting, MCC and AML monitoring
Reporting requirements to Banco Central do Brasil and Banxico include operational and statistical data, as well as specific forms on payment flows. MCC and risk categorization affect limits, escalation thresholds and chargeback thresholds. A merchant registry and AML monitoring must be regularly updated: this helps pass independent audits without emergencies.
Chargebacks and disputes: rules and metrics
Managing chargebacks and disputes requires clear rules and precise metrics to effectively reduce losses. Below we will examine key procedures, including representment stages, and practical steps to decrease the number of disputed transactions.
Representment procedures
Chargebacks and disputes in Latin America are subject to card scheme rules, but local issuers add nuances. Chargeback and representment rules require careful documentation: proof of delivery, authorization logs, 3DS results and the history of communication with the customer.
Reducing chargebacks and declines
How to reduce the chargeback rate in Latin America? Combine a clear returns policy, local customer support, correct descriptors and 3DS2 with adaptive friction. For subscriptions: proactive notifications and token updates reduce disputed charges.
Subscriptions and recurring payments
acquiring services for subscriptions and recurring payments in Mexico and Brazil require stable tokenization and card update models. AOV, LTV and CAC are metrics that directly depend on the unit economics of the transaction and the cost of approval. Smart routing and local tokens reduce churn caused by declines.
COREDO case studies: what worked
COREDO case studies show what worked in practice across different markets and challenges. Below: real examples, including cost reductions and ROI growth in Brazil, with an analysis of the approaches used and results achieved.
Cost reduction and ROI growth in Brazil
One of COREDO’s projects, a digital service with international acquiring in Brazil, had a high decline rate and MDR. After migrating to a local acquirer and adding Pix the overall cost per approval fell by 18%, ROI on implementing local acquiring paid back in 4.5 months, and the approval rate increased by 17 percentage points. The ROI estimate when switching to local acquiring was based on real AOV, MDR, chargebacks and settlement lag data.
Checklist for migrating from a foreign PSP
Migration from a foreign PSP to a local acquirer – a checklist that the COREDO team uses regularly:
- audit of MDR and all markups, including FX and early settlement;
- comparison of authorization rates by BIN and MCC;
- verification of 3DS2 flow and tokenization;
- setting up split settlements and marketplace payouts;
- tests of re-processing and retry logic on soft declines;
- legal section: contracts, KYC, rolling reserve, SLA for disputes.
Choosing a partner by region
M&A and due diligence when choosing an acquiring partner include checking licenses, reserves, SLAs and the 3DS/EMV roadmap. White‑label and SaaS acquiring solutions are suitable for fintech companies and marketplaces seeking to control UX without their own acquiring license.
Step-by-step roadmap
Step-by-step recommendations and action plans will help structure entry into the Brazilian market and avoid common mistakes when setting up acquiring. Below is a checklist for European businesses with specific steps on legal requirements, provider selection, and integrating payment solutions in Brazil.
How to set up acquiring in Brazil
- Legal structure: assessing the need to open a CNPJ and a local account.
- Licensing/partnership: choosing a local acquirer/PSP (Cielo, Rede, Getnet, PagSeguro) and setting up a merchant account and merchant ID.
- Payment methods: cards (including ELO/Hipercard), Pix, Boleto; EMV 3DS2.
- Security: PCI DSS (SAQ scope determination), P2PE, tokenization, EMV liability shift control.
- Technology: API/SDK, ISO 8583 compatibility, fallback routing, retry logic.
- Risk: fraud rules, ML model, BIN analysis, velocity rules.
- Operations: settlement cycles (T+1/T+2), rolling reserve, reconciliation and reporting in regulator format.
- Taxes: VAT/IVA impact, withholdings, FX strategy for BRL/USD and hedging.
How to set up acquiring in Mexico
- Registration: assessing the need for an MX RFC and a local bank account.
- Partnership: choosing an acquirer/PSP that supports Oxxo Pay, SPEI/CoDi and 3DS2.
- Model: PayFac/aggregator vs classic merchant with white-label capabilities.
- Technology: marketplace payments, split settlements, webhooks, idempotency.
- Security: PCI DSS, SAQ, EMV contact/contactless, tokenization.
- Risk: chargeback and representment rules, chargeback thresholds, monitoring.
- Operations: settlement currency (MXN/USD), FX conversion, correspondent banks.
- Reporting: Banxico/CNBV requirements, merchant registry, AML monitoring and local suspicious activity notifications.
Acquiring as a growth driver, not a cost
Acquiring for e‑commerce in Latin America: it’s about strategy, architecture and execution discipline. In Brazil and Mexico the advantage comes from local acquiring with support for alternative methods, correct routing, a strong fraud stack and a transparent operating model with control of FX and settlement cycles. When all elements converge, authorization rate grows, MDR decreases relative to revenue, and chargeback risk remains manageable.