Alternative jurisdictions for crypto activity instead of MiCA

Content
In 2025, over 60% of crypto-companies focusing on Europe faced the need to revise their strategy due to the tightening of MiCA and related regulatory barriers. This fact confirms: jurisdiction selection for registering a crypto-company is no longer just a tax optimization issue: it’s a strategic decision that determines market access, scaling speed, and long-term business legality.
Why are international projects forced to seek alternative jurisdictions for crypto-activities? Which countries offer flexibility, transparency, and real growth opportunities outside the constraints of MiCA? How to ensure compliance with AML requirements and investor protection without losing development pace?
In this article, I will analyze the key reasons for the migration of crypto-business beyond the EU, conduct an expert comparison of leading alternative jurisdictions, and provide step-by-step recommendations for registering and licensing crypto-companies abroad. If your goal is not just to survive in the new conditions but to use them for strategic growth, I recommend reading to the end: here, you will find not only analytics but also practical tools for decision-making.

Why are companies seeking an alternative to MiCA?

Illustration for the section "Why are companies seeking an alternative to MiCA?" in the article "Alternative Jurisdictions for Crypto Activities, instead of MiCA"

MiCA restrictions and risks for crypto-companies

MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation) has become one of the most discussed regulatory acts of recent years. Its goal is to establish uniform standards for cryptocurrency regulation in Europe, increase transparency, and protect investors. However, in practice, MiCA imposes extremely high requirements on crypto-companies.
  • Significant tightening of AML/KYC procedures and mandatory registration of all market participants.
  • Increase in compliance costs: implementing internal control procedures and regular monitoring of transactions can increase operating expenses by 20–30%.
  • Challenges in opening accounts: EU banks are reluctant to work with crypto-companies, especially in the early stages.
  • Restrictions on issuing and circulating stablecoins, reserve requirements, and reserve confirmations.
  • Risks of transaction blocking and asset freezing with the slightest suspicion of non-compliance with AMLD5 or FATF recommendations.
Practice by COREDO confirms: for many international projects, such conditions become a barrier to market entry or a reason to migrate the business to more flexible jurisdictions.

Criteria for choosing an alternative jurisdiction

Choosing a country for registering a crypto-company: it’s a balance between legality, flexibility, and speed of launch. The most in-demand criteria are:

  • Regulation transparency and predictability: clear rules and understandable licensing procedures.
  • AML/KYC flexibility: the ability to implement modern customer identification solutions without excessive bureaucracy.
  • Speed of registration and account opening: minimal application review time and no industry discrimination.
  • Scalability opportunities: access to international markets, investor protection, support for innovations (DeFi, NFT, CBDC).
  • Interaction with regulators: openness to dialogue and willingness to consider the specifics of the crypto-business.

The COREDO team has implemented dozens of projects where these parameters determined market entry success.

Best countries to open a crypto-company in 2025

Illustration for the section "Best countries to open a crypto-company in 2025" in the article "Alternative Jurisdictions for Crypto Activities, instead of MiCA"

Europe: Switzerland, Portugal, Lithuania, Poland, Georgia

Switzerland remains a benchmark for transparency and technical support for blockchain projects. It operates under the principle of “technological neutrality,” and the FINMA regulator actively interacts with the industry. Licensing requires strict adherence to AML/KYC, but in return, companies gain access to a strong financial infrastructure and a DeFi-friendly environment. Opening accounts is challenging but achievable with a well-prepared corporate structure.

Portugal attracts with low tax burdens; until recently, cryptocurrency income was tax-free. Registering a crypto-company takes 1–2 weeks, licensing requirements are moderate, and banks are gradually opening up to working with digital assets. Special attention is paid to implementing KYC procedures and transaction monitoring.

Lithuania: a leader in registration speed and issuing licenses for crypto exchanges. Capital requirements and internal policies are quite strict, but the process is transparent and takes from 2 to 4 weeks. Interaction with the regulator takes place via an online portal, speeding up application processing.

Poland and Georgia offer a quick start for crypto startups. In Georgia, no separate license for crypto-activity is required, and the tax burden is minimal. Poland is gradually tightening rules but remains flexible for small teams and innovative projects.

Asia and Africa: Singapore, Hong Kong, UAE, Mauritius, South Africa

Singapore is one of the most attractive centers for crypto-business in Asia. Company registration requires a local director and address, but the process takes only a few days. Licensing is conducted through MAS (Monetary Authority of Singapore), and AML/KYC requirements meet international FATF standards. The introduction of CBDC and support for blockchain projects make Singapore an ideal platform for scaling.

Hong Kong is actively introducing new crypto regulation standards, including licensing exchanges and DeFi platforms. The “sandbox” principle operates here, allowing innovative products to be tested without the risk of sanctions.

UAE (Dubai, Abu Dhabi), a region with minimal tax burdens and flexible conditions for international projects. Licensing is possible through specialized zones (ADGM, DMCC), and local regulators support the introduction of new technologies.

Mauritius and South Africa are jurisdictions where licensing and AML requirements are moderate, and the tax burden is minimal. They are increasingly popular among projects focusing on Africa and the Middle East.

Latin America and Offshore: El Salvador, Panama, Seychelles

El Salvador, the first country to recognize Bitcoin as an official payment method. Company registration takes just days, no licensing required, and banks open accounts without additional checks. However, the lack of strict regulation poses risks to investor protection and long-term legality.

Panama and Seychelles – offshore jurisdictions with minimal reporting and licensing requirements. These are convenient places to launch DeFi and NFT projects, but one must consider restrictions in dealing with international banks and potential reputational risks.

Comparison of jurisdictions for crypto business

Illustration for the section "Comparison of jurisdictions for crypto business" in the article "Alternative Jurisdictions for Crypto Activities, instead of MiCA"

Table: Key parameters and requirements in top jurisdictions

Jurisdiction Licensing AML/KYC Taxes Account Opening Features
Switzerland Yes Strict Moderate Difficult Transparency, DeFi-friendly
Portugal Partial Moderate Low Average No crypto income tax
Lithuania Yes Strict Average Difficult Fast registration
Georgia No Lenient Low Easy No license, quick start
Singapore Yes Strict Average Difficult CBDC adoption
El Salvador No Lenient Low Easy Bitcoin legal tender

Taxation features for crypto-companies in Asia and Africa

In Asia and Africa, the tax burden on crypto-companies ranges from symbolic rates (Mauritius, Singapore) to progressive scales (South Africa). COREDO’s solution involves a comprehensive assessment of not only tax rates but also the structure of tax obligations for cross-border operations and asset tokenization.

AML and Compliance for Crypto Businesses in Alternative Jurisdictions

Illustration for the section "AML and Compliance for Crypto Businesses in Alternative Jurisdictions" in the article "Alternative Jurisdictions for Crypto Activities, instead of MiCA"

International standards and local requirements

FATF and AMLD5 remain the foundation for building compliance processes in most developed jurisdictions. Implementing client identification (KYC) procedures, transaction monitoring, and reporting suspicious transactions: mandatory conditions for obtaining a license and opening accounts. In some countries (e.g., Lithuania and Singapore), regulators require a separate compliance officer and automated reporting.

How to ensure compliance and protect investors

COREDO’s experience has shown that automating AML/KYC and integrating with international databases can reduce operational costs and increase transaction transparency. Implementing a risk-based approach to transaction monitoring and regular internal audits are key tools for protecting investors and minimizing account blocking risks.

Regulation of new crypto-products: Stablecoins, DeFi, NFT

Illustration for the section "Regulation of new crypto-products: Stablecoins, DeFi, NFT" in the article "Alternative Jurisdictions for Crypto Activities, instead of MiCA"

Regulation features for stablecoins and tokens

Outside the EU, the requirements for stablecoin reserve coverage and reserve confirmations vary. In the US, the “federal qualified issuer” principle applies (GENIUS Act), in Asia and offshore, more flexible approaches allow the launch of innovative products with minimal costs. However, the lack of a single standard requires careful legal restructuring of the token’s structure and investor protection mechanisms.

CBDC and blockchain technology integration into business

The integration of central bank digital currencies (CBDC) is becoming a new trend for international companies. The COREDO team has supported projects integrating CBDC into corporate payment processes, which enhanced transaction speed and reduced cross-border transfer costs. In some jurisdictions, there are pilot programs for testing CBDC in conjunction with DeFi and asset tokenization.

Practical steps: how to choose and register a crypto-company outside the EU

Step-by-step instruction on registration and licensing

  1. Business model analysis: Determine target markets, products (DeFi, NFT, stablecoins), and transaction volumes.
  2. Choose jurisdiction: Evaluate licensing requirements, AML/KYC, tax burdens, and availability of banking services.
  3. Document collection: Founding documents, business plan, AML/KYC policies, beneficiary information.
  4. Application submission and interaction with the regulator: Use online portals (e.g., ACRA in Singapore), be prepared for interviews and providing additional information.
  5. Open corporate account: In some countries, the personal presence of the director or the use of a licensed agent’s services might be required.
  6. Implement compliance procedures: Appoint a compliance officer, integrate transaction monitoring systems.

Criteria for jurisdiction selection for scaling

  • ROI: Evaluate the total costs for registration, licensing, and business maintenance.
  • Risks: Analyze legal and reputational risks associated with the jurisdiction.
  • Legality: Ensure international recognition of the license and the ability to work with major banks and payment systems.
  • Investor protection: Verify deposit insurance mechanisms and dispute resolution options.

Risks and advantages of registering a crypto-company outside the EU

Main risks: legal, financial, reputational

Registering a crypto-company outside the EU may involve:

  • Insufficient protection of investor rights and limited access to international judicial mechanisms.
  • Risks of account blocking and service denial by banks.
  • Reputational costs when operating in offshore jurisdictions.
The COREDO team encountered cases where the lack of a transparent structure and unaccounted FATF requirements led to asset freezes and the need for urgent business migration.

Advantages: flexibility, speed, tax optimization

At the same time, alternative jurisdictions allow:

  • Launching projects in 1–2 weeks with minimal costs.
  • Using tax benefits and the absence of double taxation.
  • Scaling business without restrictions on types of activities and geography.
A COREDO-completed project for launching an NFT platform in Portugal enabled the client to enter the market in 10 days and integrate DeFi modules without additional approvals.

Key conclusions and recommendations for entrepreneurs

  • Alternative jurisdictions for crypto activities: it’s not only a way to bypass MiCA’s restrictions but also an opportunity to build a sustainable business model considering global trends.
  • Best countries to open a crypto-company in 2025: Switzerland, Portugal, Lithuania, Singapore, UAE, and Georgia, each offering a unique balance between legality, flexibility, and tax optimization.
  • Registering a crypto-company abroad requires a comprehensive approach: analyzing the business model, choosing jurisdiction, implementing compliance procedures, and continuous monitoring of legislative changes.
  • To minimize risks and ensure long-term business legality, I recommend relying on the experience of professional consultants, integrating international AML/KYC standards, and building a transparent corporate structure.
COREDO’s practice confirms: a strategic approach to jurisdiction selection and competent legal support not only reduce costs but also ensure sustainable growth even amid constant changes in global regulation.
LEAVE AN APPLICATION AND GET
A CONSULTATION

    By contacting us you agree to your details being used for the purposes of processing your application in accordance with our Privacy policy.